The staple of most construction contracts has embedded dispute resolution provisions. Learn what these are and how to apply these to expedite resolution of your dispute.
The Harlem Renaissance was a period in the 1920s-1940s when there was a flowering of African American culture, especially in Harlem, New York. Many African Americans had migrated north during the Great Migration to escape racism and find jobs. Artists drew inspiration from African and jazz styles and sought to express their own African American identity and experiences. Key artists featured paintings, sculptures, writings and more that explored themes of African American life and history and influenced 20th century art for decades. The Great Depression eventually ended the Harlem Renaissance by the late 1930s but its impact on African American culture has endured.
The document provides details about Rizal's second novel "El Filibusterismo", which is the sequel to his first novel "Noli Me Tangere". It describes the plot of the novel, which follows the character Crisostomo Ibarra/Simoun who returns to the Philippines disillusioned with the Spanish and plans to start a violent revolution. However, the revolution is averted after Basilio warns his friend Isagani about the planned bombing. The chapter also discusses Rizal's views on reform versus revolution in light of characters from his novels.
TOOT Vol. 1: Sun Yuan & Peng Yu and Kan Xuankozakartclass
This early video work features the artist herself dashing through subway tunnels, suggesting themes of movement, transitory experiences, and the artist engaging directly with her surroundings.
Dispute resolution boards (DRBs) provide an alternative dispute resolution process for construction disputes. Contracts will typically include provisions requiring the parties to establish a DRB and refer disputes to the DRB for a recommendation. DRBs work in a two-stage process, first aiming to prevent issues from escalating through regular meetings, and then providing formal written recommendations if disputes are not resolved. Using a DRB process would generally satisfy pre-action protocol requirements for attempting dispute resolution. While DRBs involve costs for the board members, these costs are much lower than the potential costs of full litigation for construction disputes.
Construction Contracts: Basics of Contracts and Contract AdministrationGerald R. (Jerry) Genge
The CCDC 2 Stipulated Price Contract is the "go to" document for construction contracts. Learn the basic components and roles of eth parties to the contract.
Lecture slides to M.A.Sc. students on pros and cons of various dispute resolution venues with a case study added that moved 10-year case from complaint to appeal court decision
Adriana Spassova presentation. Networking that was made jointly by DRBF and Artyushenko & Partners law firm (Kazakhstan) in Almaty (Kazakhstan) - DAB in Construction, April 25, 2018. Details are here https://a-p.legal/en/2018/05/01/report-on-our-networking-on-april-25-2018/
The Harlem Renaissance was a period in the 1920s-1940s when there was a flowering of African American culture, especially in Harlem, New York. Many African Americans had migrated north during the Great Migration to escape racism and find jobs. Artists drew inspiration from African and jazz styles and sought to express their own African American identity and experiences. Key artists featured paintings, sculptures, writings and more that explored themes of African American life and history and influenced 20th century art for decades. The Great Depression eventually ended the Harlem Renaissance by the late 1930s but its impact on African American culture has endured.
The document provides details about Rizal's second novel "El Filibusterismo", which is the sequel to his first novel "Noli Me Tangere". It describes the plot of the novel, which follows the character Crisostomo Ibarra/Simoun who returns to the Philippines disillusioned with the Spanish and plans to start a violent revolution. However, the revolution is averted after Basilio warns his friend Isagani about the planned bombing. The chapter also discusses Rizal's views on reform versus revolution in light of characters from his novels.
TOOT Vol. 1: Sun Yuan & Peng Yu and Kan Xuankozakartclass
This early video work features the artist herself dashing through subway tunnels, suggesting themes of movement, transitory experiences, and the artist engaging directly with her surroundings.
Dispute resolution boards (DRBs) provide an alternative dispute resolution process for construction disputes. Contracts will typically include provisions requiring the parties to establish a DRB and refer disputes to the DRB for a recommendation. DRBs work in a two-stage process, first aiming to prevent issues from escalating through regular meetings, and then providing formal written recommendations if disputes are not resolved. Using a DRB process would generally satisfy pre-action protocol requirements for attempting dispute resolution. While DRBs involve costs for the board members, these costs are much lower than the potential costs of full litigation for construction disputes.
Construction Contracts: Basics of Contracts and Contract AdministrationGerald R. (Jerry) Genge
The CCDC 2 Stipulated Price Contract is the "go to" document for construction contracts. Learn the basic components and roles of eth parties to the contract.
Lecture slides to M.A.Sc. students on pros and cons of various dispute resolution venues with a case study added that moved 10-year case from complaint to appeal court decision
Adriana Spassova presentation. Networking that was made jointly by DRBF and Artyushenko & Partners law firm (Kazakhstan) in Almaty (Kazakhstan) - DAB in Construction, April 25, 2018. Details are here https://a-p.legal/en/2018/05/01/report-on-our-networking-on-april-25-2018/
The document discusses several questions related to alternative dispute resolution. It begins by summarizing the key defects in the current system of justice administration in India, including case pendency, lengthy procedures, high costs, and lack of transparency in judicial appointments. It then discusses the meaning of arbitration agreements and the difference between arbitration agreements and arbitration clauses. Finally, it analyzes a hypothetical case study regarding the potential grounds to challenge an arbitral award and arbitrator appointment.
The document discusses construction disputes, their causes, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It provides details on:
1) Causes of construction disputes include late or non-payment, inaccurate cost valuations, delays in information, and ambiguities in contract requirements.
2) Dispute resolution clauses in contracts set out the mechanism for resolving disputes, often through arbitration.
3) For government construction contracts, disputes are typically resolved through a multi-level process involving engineers, committees, and potentially arbitration if issues remain unresolved.
This document provides an overview of dispute resolution mechanisms in construction projects. It begins by defining what a dispute is and noting that disputes can cause projects to fail and for all parties to incur losses. The main causes of disputes are then outlined, including issues with payments, contract documentation, time and cost overruns, and construction information and supervision. Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are introduced, including negotiation, mediation, dispute review boards, arbitration, and litigation. Each of these options is then described in one to three paragraphs detailing the key aspects and processes involved.
This document discusses dispute resolution mechanisms in construction projects. It begins by defining what a dispute is and noting that disputes can arise for a variety of reasons, such as late or non-payment, inaccurate valuations, and delays. It then outlines several alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, including negotiation, mediation, dispute review boards, arbitration, and litigation. For each method, it provides a brief overview of the process and key considerations. The overall document serves to introduce common approaches for resolving disputes in the construction industry.
Early Dispute Resolution in the Construction IndustryFrancis Ho
The document discusses various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for resolving construction disputes more efficiently than litigation. It describes problem-solving hierarchies, expert determination, dispute boards, and highlights advantages and disadvantages of each method. Problem-solving hierarchies allow issues to be referred to increasingly senior individuals until resolved, while expert determination and dispute boards utilize neutral experts to resolve technical or specialized issues more quickly than courts. However, no single ADR method is suitable for every dispute type.
The document summarizes key points from a presentation on simplifying property disposals for local governments. It discusses initial considerations for disposing of property like approvals needed, permitted uses, and budget. It also covers due diligence processes like reviewing the title and any restrictions. The presentation outlines different structures for property disposals like freehold sales, leasehold options, and deals involving works or services. Finally, it discusses the road to exchanging contracts, including negotiations, and post-completion matters like monitoring obligations.
Construction disputes arise from environmental and behavioural factors. There are many different causes of disputes in the construction industry. Disputes waste money, therefore drain profits and destroy the relationship and it takes energy away from projects.
construction dispute cases
construction dispute lawyer
construction disputes statistics
construction dispute letter
causes of disputes in construction
construction disputes attorney
construction dispute resolution services llc
homeowner vs contractor disputes
building construction ppt
construction ppt presentations
The document provides information on best practices for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It discusses that ADR can help support court reform by providing alternatives to full legal proceedings. Different ADR options are described from facilitated negotiations to arbitration that resembles a courtroom process. The document also discusses how ADR methods like dispute boards have been incorporated into FIDIC construction contracts to allow for binding decisions on disputes prior to formal legal proceedings. Key aspects of employing dispute boards and their increasing focus on dispute avoidance are covered.
The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clauses for international commercial contracts. It recommends including an arbitration clause that specifies an arbitral institution and its rules. It also suggests allowing for mediation or conciliation if one party elects it. Escalation clauses can help resolve disputes but should clearly define each step and avoid complex procedures. Interim relief may be needed, so ensure the arbitration law and rules permit court applications. Specialist legal advice is advised when drafting or modifying ADR clauses.
Expert Determination Webinar by Chris MakinChris_Makin
Chris delivered this presentation to delegates from the Mediator Network:
It covered:
What is Expert Determination?
How does it differ from other forms of ADR/dispute resolution?
Getting your appointment right - the engagement letter and the contract between expert and parties.
Should the Expert Determiner stick to their expertise?
What is the procedure and the rules to adopt?
What to include in the determination?
Construction Dispute Resolution and Avoidance in a Boom MarketFrancis Ho
This document discusses construction dispute resolution and avoidance in a booming construction market. It summarizes various dispute resolution methods including (1) adjudication which provides quick, binding interim decisions but may be less suited to complex cases; (2) court proceedings through the specialist Technology and Construction Court which are suited to complex cases but slow and expensive; (3) arbitration which is confidential but can be slow to start; and (4) alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation and dispute boards. It stresses that dispute avoidance through careful contract drafting and project management is the cheapest option.
The document discusses various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for avoiding litigation, including their advantages and disadvantages. It focuses on mediation as an option. Key points include:
- Mediation is a flexible confidential process where a neutral mediator helps parties work towards a negotiated agreement. Agreements are not binding unless a settlement is reached.
- UK court rules encourage staying proceedings for one month to allow ADR like mediation. Courts will consider parties' efforts to resolve disputes when deciding on costs.
- Case law establishes that refusing reasonable offers to mediate carries risks of costs sanctions if litigation proceeds. Factors for assessing reasonableness are outlined.
- Proper consideration of ADR options is required before
The Law on Trade Dispute resolution (Labour Law) (Kenya)Quincy Kiptoo
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for resolving trade disputes, including their definitions, processes, advantages, and disadvantages. It outlines several ADR methods:
1. Negotiation - Direct communication between disputing parties to jointly resolve the issue. It is voluntary, informal, and flexible but power imbalances can disadvantage weaker parties.
2. Mediation/Conciliation - A neutral third party assists negotiations but does not make binding decisions. It aims to maintain relationships while resolving multiple issues privately and quickly. However, it is not binding and power imbalances may still influence the process.
3. Arbitration - A third party hears evidence and renders a binding decision. Parties have
This document discusses the rights of setting-off by an employer under a construction contract. It outlines that a contractor has 28 days to accept or 21 days to dispute a set-off amount provided by a quantity surveyor. If disputed, the employer has 21 days to accept the contractor's disagreement or the dispute can be referred to adjudication. Adjudication aims to enable works to continue while temporarily resolving disputes. Liquidated damages are exempt from set-off procedures and must be resolved separately.
3- Construction Disputes Lectures COVERING NEGOTIATION AND ARBITRATIONengrqasimbutt
➢ If the Contractor considers himself to be entitled to any extension of the Time for Completion and/or any additional payment, under any Clause of these Conditions or otherwise in connection with the Contract, the Contractor shall give notice to the Engineer, describing the event or circumstance giving rise to the claim. The notice shall be given as soon as practicable, and not later than 28 days after the Contractor became aware, or should have become aware, of the event or circumstance
This document discusses consultant liability under environmental law in Canada. It begins by outlining obligations and liabilities for professional engineers under the Professional Engineers Act, including the duty to prioritize public welfare. It then discusses potential discipline actions for issues of professional misconduct or incompetence. Professional misconduct is defined, and can include negligence, failure to correct dangerous situations, or undertaking work outside one's experience. Penalties for misconduct or incompetence include revoking or suspending licenses. The document concludes by discussing liability in tort and contract, including how contractual clauses can limit liability if certain conditions are met. It provides examples of cases where limitation clauses were found to be invalid.
Does an arbitrator with subject matter expertise get a better decisionGerald R. (Jerry) Genge
An arbitrator with subject matter expertise may be able to resolve technical disputes more efficiently than a judge without that expertise. They can directly question experts and have them work together to narrow disagreements. In cases the author was involved in, bringing all experts together under an arbitrator's guidance reduced the time to submit evidence by half and sometimes led to same-day settlements. While conventional legal processes uphold due process, cases overseen by an expert arbitrator can find resolutions more quickly with less spent on time and costs, while potentially arriving at better answers on liability and damages issues.
For designers to build in resilience and adaptability to meet future climate loads, Building Codes must evolve to include predictive temperature, precipitation, wind, gust, and other environmental loads on buildings. This slide show includes selected information from ECCC on explains the current serious limitations facing designers.
The document discusses several questions related to alternative dispute resolution. It begins by summarizing the key defects in the current system of justice administration in India, including case pendency, lengthy procedures, high costs, and lack of transparency in judicial appointments. It then discusses the meaning of arbitration agreements and the difference between arbitration agreements and arbitration clauses. Finally, it analyzes a hypothetical case study regarding the potential grounds to challenge an arbitral award and arbitrator appointment.
The document discusses construction disputes, their causes, and dispute resolution mechanisms. It provides details on:
1) Causes of construction disputes include late or non-payment, inaccurate cost valuations, delays in information, and ambiguities in contract requirements.
2) Dispute resolution clauses in contracts set out the mechanism for resolving disputes, often through arbitration.
3) For government construction contracts, disputes are typically resolved through a multi-level process involving engineers, committees, and potentially arbitration if issues remain unresolved.
This document provides an overview of dispute resolution mechanisms in construction projects. It begins by defining what a dispute is and noting that disputes can cause projects to fail and for all parties to incur losses. The main causes of disputes are then outlined, including issues with payments, contract documentation, time and cost overruns, and construction information and supervision. Alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are introduced, including negotiation, mediation, dispute review boards, arbitration, and litigation. Each of these options is then described in one to three paragraphs detailing the key aspects and processes involved.
This document discusses dispute resolution mechanisms in construction projects. It begins by defining what a dispute is and noting that disputes can arise for a variety of reasons, such as late or non-payment, inaccurate valuations, and delays. It then outlines several alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms, including negotiation, mediation, dispute review boards, arbitration, and litigation. For each method, it provides a brief overview of the process and key considerations. The overall document serves to introduce common approaches for resolving disputes in the construction industry.
Early Dispute Resolution in the Construction IndustryFrancis Ho
The document discusses various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for resolving construction disputes more efficiently than litigation. It describes problem-solving hierarchies, expert determination, dispute boards, and highlights advantages and disadvantages of each method. Problem-solving hierarchies allow issues to be referred to increasingly senior individuals until resolved, while expert determination and dispute boards utilize neutral experts to resolve technical or specialized issues more quickly than courts. However, no single ADR method is suitable for every dispute type.
The document summarizes key points from a presentation on simplifying property disposals for local governments. It discusses initial considerations for disposing of property like approvals needed, permitted uses, and budget. It also covers due diligence processes like reviewing the title and any restrictions. The presentation outlines different structures for property disposals like freehold sales, leasehold options, and deals involving works or services. Finally, it discusses the road to exchanging contracts, including negotiations, and post-completion matters like monitoring obligations.
Construction disputes arise from environmental and behavioural factors. There are many different causes of disputes in the construction industry. Disputes waste money, therefore drain profits and destroy the relationship and it takes energy away from projects.
construction dispute cases
construction dispute lawyer
construction disputes statistics
construction dispute letter
causes of disputes in construction
construction disputes attorney
construction dispute resolution services llc
homeowner vs contractor disputes
building construction ppt
construction ppt presentations
The document provides information on best practices for alternative dispute resolution (ADR). It discusses that ADR can help support court reform by providing alternatives to full legal proceedings. Different ADR options are described from facilitated negotiations to arbitration that resembles a courtroom process. The document also discusses how ADR methods like dispute boards have been incorporated into FIDIC construction contracts to allow for binding decisions on disputes prior to formal legal proceedings. Key aspects of employing dispute boards and their increasing focus on dispute avoidance are covered.
The document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clauses for international commercial contracts. It recommends including an arbitration clause that specifies an arbitral institution and its rules. It also suggests allowing for mediation or conciliation if one party elects it. Escalation clauses can help resolve disputes but should clearly define each step and avoid complex procedures. Interim relief may be needed, so ensure the arbitration law and rules permit court applications. Specialist legal advice is advised when drafting or modifying ADR clauses.
Expert Determination Webinar by Chris MakinChris_Makin
Chris delivered this presentation to delegates from the Mediator Network:
It covered:
What is Expert Determination?
How does it differ from other forms of ADR/dispute resolution?
Getting your appointment right - the engagement letter and the contract between expert and parties.
Should the Expert Determiner stick to their expertise?
What is the procedure and the rules to adopt?
What to include in the determination?
Construction Dispute Resolution and Avoidance in a Boom MarketFrancis Ho
This document discusses construction dispute resolution and avoidance in a booming construction market. It summarizes various dispute resolution methods including (1) adjudication which provides quick, binding interim decisions but may be less suited to complex cases; (2) court proceedings through the specialist Technology and Construction Court which are suited to complex cases but slow and expensive; (3) arbitration which is confidential but can be slow to start; and (4) alternative dispute resolution methods like mediation and dispute boards. It stresses that dispute avoidance through careful contract drafting and project management is the cheapest option.
The document discusses various alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for avoiding litigation, including their advantages and disadvantages. It focuses on mediation as an option. Key points include:
- Mediation is a flexible confidential process where a neutral mediator helps parties work towards a negotiated agreement. Agreements are not binding unless a settlement is reached.
- UK court rules encourage staying proceedings for one month to allow ADR like mediation. Courts will consider parties' efforts to resolve disputes when deciding on costs.
- Case law establishes that refusing reasonable offers to mediate carries risks of costs sanctions if litigation proceeds. Factors for assessing reasonableness are outlined.
- Proper consideration of ADR options is required before
The Law on Trade Dispute resolution (Labour Law) (Kenya)Quincy Kiptoo
This document discusses alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods for resolving trade disputes, including their definitions, processes, advantages, and disadvantages. It outlines several ADR methods:
1. Negotiation - Direct communication between disputing parties to jointly resolve the issue. It is voluntary, informal, and flexible but power imbalances can disadvantage weaker parties.
2. Mediation/Conciliation - A neutral third party assists negotiations but does not make binding decisions. It aims to maintain relationships while resolving multiple issues privately and quickly. However, it is not binding and power imbalances may still influence the process.
3. Arbitration - A third party hears evidence and renders a binding decision. Parties have
This document discusses the rights of setting-off by an employer under a construction contract. It outlines that a contractor has 28 days to accept or 21 days to dispute a set-off amount provided by a quantity surveyor. If disputed, the employer has 21 days to accept the contractor's disagreement or the dispute can be referred to adjudication. Adjudication aims to enable works to continue while temporarily resolving disputes. Liquidated damages are exempt from set-off procedures and must be resolved separately.
3- Construction Disputes Lectures COVERING NEGOTIATION AND ARBITRATIONengrqasimbutt
➢ If the Contractor considers himself to be entitled to any extension of the Time for Completion and/or any additional payment, under any Clause of these Conditions or otherwise in connection with the Contract, the Contractor shall give notice to the Engineer, describing the event or circumstance giving rise to the claim. The notice shall be given as soon as practicable, and not later than 28 days after the Contractor became aware, or should have become aware, of the event or circumstance
This document discusses consultant liability under environmental law in Canada. It begins by outlining obligations and liabilities for professional engineers under the Professional Engineers Act, including the duty to prioritize public welfare. It then discusses potential discipline actions for issues of professional misconduct or incompetence. Professional misconduct is defined, and can include negligence, failure to correct dangerous situations, or undertaking work outside one's experience. Penalties for misconduct or incompetence include revoking or suspending licenses. The document concludes by discussing liability in tort and contract, including how contractual clauses can limit liability if certain conditions are met. It provides examples of cases where limitation clauses were found to be invalid.
Does an arbitrator with subject matter expertise get a better decisionGerald R. (Jerry) Genge
An arbitrator with subject matter expertise may be able to resolve technical disputes more efficiently than a judge without that expertise. They can directly question experts and have them work together to narrow disagreements. In cases the author was involved in, bringing all experts together under an arbitrator's guidance reduced the time to submit evidence by half and sometimes led to same-day settlements. While conventional legal processes uphold due process, cases overseen by an expert arbitrator can find resolutions more quickly with less spent on time and costs, while potentially arriving at better answers on liability and damages issues.
For designers to build in resilience and adaptability to meet future climate loads, Building Codes must evolve to include predictive temperature, precipitation, wind, gust, and other environmental loads on buildings. This slide show includes selected information from ECCC on explains the current serious limitations facing designers.
The document discusses a case study that uses the PIEVC process to assess the effects of climate change on buildings. It summarizes the 5 steps of the PIEVC protocol: 1) define the project, 2) gather data, 3) assess risk, 4) engineering analysis, and 5) recommendations. It then provides details of steps 1-3 as applied to a sample 16-story residential building in Toronto, identifying key climate change risks like increased temperature, rainfall, and need for air conditioning. Components at medium-high risk included grounds/drainage, the building envelope, and mechanical drainage systems.
Genge, kerr assessing the effects of climate change on buildings using the pi...Gerald R. (Jerry) Genge
The Canadian Public Infrastructure Engineering Vulnerability Committee Climate Change Assessment protocol was applied to an existing 40+-year old residential apartment in Toronto. Key findings included a need to respond to Climate Change by altering the design parameters for buildings being designed today to be better able to respond and to improve predictive models.
Are your expert reports comprehensive, coherent, and defensible? This presentation highlights why you should embrace "Ethical Influence" as a means to displace bias and indecision and lists the Six Soft Spots in Expert Reports that you must avoid.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
The presentation deals with the concept of Right to Default Bail laid down under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and Section 187 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptxOmGod1
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
1. CCDC 2: Dispute Resolution
Gerald R. Genge,
P.Eng., C.Eng., BDS, BSSO, C.Arb. Q.Med.
Principal – Arbitech ADR
2. Topics
• Contract Interpretation
• CCDC 2 Dispute Resolution
• Objection to a Finding and Reply
• Project Mediator
• What if Mediation Fails?
• CCDC 40 – Rules
• Arbitration
Arbi•TECH
3. Contract Interpretation
• Often if there is a dispute as to the fulfillment of a
Contract the courts will usually try to interpret the
expressed intention of the terms.
• If the terms are vague, the court will likely look at
the overall intent of the Contract to interpret the
matter.
• If the Contract is too one-sided or unfair, the court
may interpret against the party that drafted the
Contract.
Arbi•TECH
4. Contract Disputes
• Disputes are common and manageable
• Initiation of a dispute resolution process is often best
handled before there is a dispute.
• Do not assume that you’ll be able to “work it out”
Arbi•TECH
5. Business is Business
• Contracts exist to set out clearly, the rules of
engagement.
• Dispute resolution processes are now common in
contracts.
• The more explicit the resolution terms, the more likely
the business relationship will survive the dispute.
Arbi•TECH
6. CCDC 2 Dispute Resolution
• GC 8 – sets out the “Rules”
• GC 8.1 – Consultant as “first arbiter of the Contract”
gives a “finding” (per GC 2.2) except financing issues
(GC 5.1)*
• GC 8.2 – Either party has 15 working days to object
or has deemed to accept the Consultant’s finding.
• CLA Review provides numerous recommendations
for an Ontario Adjudicator role to deal with PP
disputes.
Arbi•TECH
7. Objection to a Finding
• GC 8.2.2
• Within 15 working days of a “finding” the objecting
party must send the other party and the Consultant
written notice of the particulars in dispute and the
provision of the Contract relied upon in support of
the dispute.
Arbi•TECH
8. Reply to Objection
• GC 8.2.2
• Within 10 working days of an “objection notice” the
responding party must send the other party and
the Consultant written notice of the particulars in
dispute and the provision of the Contract relied
upon in support of the dispute.
Arbi•TECH
9. The Project Mediator
• GC 8.2.1
• Supposed to be appointed within 30 days of the
award of the Contract.
• Failing that…. Within 15 days of a request by
either party to appoint a Project Mediator
• What would you think if such a request were made?
……..Maybe you should start to make the appointment
anyway.
Arbi•TECH
10. The Role of Project Mediator
• GC 8.2.4
• 10 working days after receipt of the “response” to
the “objection” to the Consultant’s “Finding”, the
parties are to request that the Project Mediator
assist in negotiating an agreement.
• GC 8.2.3
• All negotiations are to be conducted amicably,
without prejudice, and providing timely disclosure
of all facts.
Arbi•TECH
11. Mediation Period
• GC 8.2.5
• The Project Mediator is given 10 working days (or
any additional agreed period) to settle the dispute.
• Anxiety and disclosure will often extend the 10 day
period unless the dispute is very simple – in which
case it may not go to mediation but be otherwise
settled or deferred by agreement of the parties.
Nonetheless, a mediator can “temper” feelings of
hostility and entitlement against future costs and
lost opportunities.
Arbi•TECH
12. If Mediation Fails…
• GC 8.2.5
• The mediator gives notice in writing to the parties
and
• GC 8.2.6
• Either party may within the next 10 days request
arbitration to finally resolve the dispute.
• GC 8.2.7
• If no request for arbitration is given (in the 10 days)
the requirement for arbitration is not binding on the
parties
Arbi•TECH
13. Then What?…
• GC 8.2.7
• Unresolved disputes can be referred to court or
any other agreed form of dispute resolution.
• GC 8.2.8
• If arbitration is not required (by notice), all disputes
shall be held in abeyance and consolidated.
Arbi•TECH
14. Abeyance?…
• GC 8.2.8
• Unresolved disputes can be held in
abeyance and consolidated into a single
dispute upon:
• Substantial Performance,
• The Contract is terminated, or
• The Contract is abandoned
Arbi•TECH
15. Alternative Dispute
Resolution Rules - CCDC 40
• Parties must have “Authority to Settle”
• Legal counsel may be present
• Project mediator shall not provide legal advice
• Parties shall be candid and make reasonable
effort to resolve the dispute
Arbi•TECH
16. Alternative Dispute
Resolution Rules - CCDC 40
(Cont’d)
• Oral Statements from each party to start- briefly
explaining the position and reasons
• Each party has a private caucus with Project
Mediator (if it will assist or is requested by the party)
• Project Mediator aides by pointing out points of
agreement and exploring alternative solutions to
disagreements
Arbi•TECH
17. Alternative Dispute
Resolution Rules - CCDC 40
(Cont’d)• Time may be extended with agreement of the parties
• Any settlement is to be recorded explaining the:
• Issue resolved
• Obligations assumed and criteria for and test for
meeting criteria
• Consequences of failure to comply with the
agreement
• Time frame for compliance
Arbi•TECH
18. Alternative Dispute
Resolution Rules - CCDC 40
(Cont’d)
• Termination of mediation may be initiated by either
party without reason
• The Project Mediator then provides written notice of
the Termination and the date of termination.
Arbi•TECH
19. Benefits of Arbitration
• Courts unlikely to intervene if an Arbitration
agreement is in place.
• Select the Arbitrator from qualified experts
• Can expedite the resolution
• Gives reasons for award
• Is final and binding (or not worth doing)
Arbi•TECH
20. Alternative Dispute
Resolution Summary
• CCDC Contracts anticipate disputes and
provide a framework for resolution
• Follow the rules to retain credibility
• Maintain complete project records to support
your claim and understand opponents’ reply
• Seeks legal and/or professional advise when
appropriate
Arbi•TECH
21. Appeals on Arbitration
• Appeal of a decision to court is with “leave” only
• Courts unlikely to decline appeal unless the
arbitration was incorrect in process.
• Court may appeal on a question of:
• Law
• Fact (if the arbitration agreement allows)
• Mixed fact and law (if the arbitration agreement
allows)
Arbi•TECH
22. CCDC 2: Dispute Resolution
For more…. Visit
https://www.linkedin.com/in/gerald-r-jerry-genge-34587943/
Thank you for watching…..
Editor's Notes
DAY 3
Contracts
Forms & Parties of and to a Contract
Payments and Holdbacks
Performance of Contract
Completion & Deficiencies
Construction Liens
Contract Disputes
.