The document summarizes the report from the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. The report recommends that bibliographic control become more collaborative, decentralized, web-based, and international in scope. It suggests making efficiency improvements, enhancing access to special collections, positioning technology and the community for the future, and strengthening the library and information science profession. Key themes are economics, standards, cooperation, users, and research. The LC plans to analyze the recommendations and work with the library community to respond and implement changes over time.
Presented at the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) Web Archiving Week, University of London, 16 June 2017.
Web archiving has become imperative to ensure that our digital heritage does not disappear forever, yet many institutions have not begun this work. In addition, archived websites are not easily discoverable, which severely limits their use. To address this challenge, OCLC Research has established the OCLC Research Library Partnership Web Archiving Metadata Working Group to develop a data dictionary that will be compatible with library and archives standards. Three reports on this project are available in July 2017, focused on metadata best practices guidelines, user needs and behaviors, and evaluation of web archiving tools.
More information: oc.lc/wam
Contact: Jackie Dooley, dooleyj@oclc.org
Data mining OCLC for translations.
Creating authority records for VIAF.
Remodelling the bibliorgraphic structure to make the best mutli-lingual displays from all available data in a work set.
This presentation was given by Carl Stahmer of UC-Davis during the NISO Virtual Conference, BIBFRAME & Real World Applications of Linked Bibliographic Data, held on June 15, 2016
Presented by Karen Calhoun at the NYLINK Forum, New York Public Library, January 16 2009. Discusses the rationale for and issues associated with the revision of OCLC's policy for the use and transfer of WorldCat records.
The universe of linked data is rapidly expanding and our community is finding innovative ways to link and apply data. This session will cover several initiatives and projects using linked data to improve discovery and reuse of information.
Speakers: Richard Wallis, Technology Evangelist, OCLC; Tom Johnson, Digital Applications Librarian, Oregon State University
Presented at the International Internet Preservation Consortium (IIPC) Web Archiving Week, University of London, 16 June 2017.
Web archiving has become imperative to ensure that our digital heritage does not disappear forever, yet many institutions have not begun this work. In addition, archived websites are not easily discoverable, which severely limits their use. To address this challenge, OCLC Research has established the OCLC Research Library Partnership Web Archiving Metadata Working Group to develop a data dictionary that will be compatible with library and archives standards. Three reports on this project are available in July 2017, focused on metadata best practices guidelines, user needs and behaviors, and evaluation of web archiving tools.
More information: oc.lc/wam
Contact: Jackie Dooley, dooleyj@oclc.org
Data mining OCLC for translations.
Creating authority records for VIAF.
Remodelling the bibliorgraphic structure to make the best mutli-lingual displays from all available data in a work set.
This presentation was given by Carl Stahmer of UC-Davis during the NISO Virtual Conference, BIBFRAME & Real World Applications of Linked Bibliographic Data, held on June 15, 2016
Presented by Karen Calhoun at the NYLINK Forum, New York Public Library, January 16 2009. Discusses the rationale for and issues associated with the revision of OCLC's policy for the use and transfer of WorldCat records.
The universe of linked data is rapidly expanding and our community is finding innovative ways to link and apply data. This session will cover several initiatives and projects using linked data to improve discovery and reuse of information.
Speakers: Richard Wallis, Technology Evangelist, OCLC; Tom Johnson, Digital Applications Librarian, Oregon State University
The network reshapes the research library collectionlisld
The library collection has been central to library identity and service, however we are now seeing major changes in how libraries help discover, curate and create collections. This is a response to evolving research and learning behaviors in a network environment. This presentation considers trends which are influencing how we think about library curatorial activities and are reshaping their collections. The first direction is the ‘inside-out library’ which is a response to the reorganization of research work by the digital environment. The second is the facilitated collections, which is a response to the reorganization of the information space by the network. The presentation discusses three ways in which we are thinking differently about collections: the inside out collection, the facilitated collection, and the collective collection.
Keynote presentation at the Lita Forum, Albuquerque. Research and learning practices are enacted in technology rich environments. New tools support digital workflows and the volume and variety of research and learning outputs are growing. Libraries are working to support these new environments and to connect their services to them.
The research library: scalable efficiency and scalable learninglisld
As research libraries are being reconfigured in a network environment, two important trends are emerging. The first is to accelerate the sharing of infrastructure, either through collaborative services or with third party providers. The second is to engage more deeply with the research and learning processes of their campuses. As research and learning processes themselves change, the research library has to respond and this makes being responsive and open to learning very important.
Learning the Lingo: Building Foundations for Successful Partnerships and Collaborations upon which Successful Systems Integrations can be Built
Carl Grant, Associate Dean, Knowledge Services & Chief Technology Officer, University of Oklahoma
Social metadata for libraries, archives and museums: Research findings from t...Rose Holley
The presentative gives research findings from the Research Libraries Group (RLG) on Social Metadata Working Group. The group worked from 2009-2010 researching sites that used social media features before making some recommendations to libraries, archives and museums.
Keynote Speaker: Matt Goldner, Executive Director, Cooperative Collection Services, OCLC
Expanding Our Horizons: Reaching for the Limits[PowerPoint]
The future of the library OPAC as a destination information portal is shaky at best. To surface library collections in today's information environment, libraries will have to move toward exposing themselves in multiple locations and through multiple methods. Looking at some of the successful ways OCLC has been able to surface the library's full capacity can give libraries one way to consider their futures.
From local infrastructure to engagement - thinking about the library in the l...lisld
Libraries are rebalancing services and directions so that they are more active in the lives of their users. This presentation frames this discussion. It looks at shifts in user behaviours, collections, and spaces, and describes how OCLC Reseach is helping libraries make these transitions.
This presentation was given at the Minitex ILL Meeting in St Paul on 12 May 2015.
Creating and Sustaining Communities Around Shared Data: The Case of OCLCKaren S Calhoun
Presented by Karen Calhoun at the ALCTS Forum, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, Denver CO, 26 January 2009. Discusses community norms and policies for sharing the data that supports the discovery and delivery of library collections; places these in the context of the broader data sharing environment outside libraries; and analyzes the process and rationale for revising OCLC's Guidelines for the Use and Transfer of Records.
Slides from Richard Green, Chris Arwe (Hull University, Hydra Project) David Wilcox (Fedora) Anders Conrad Sparre (Royal Library of Denmark) Gregory Markus (Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision/ EuropeanaTech) about European efforts towards building a better FLOSS Community, the benefits of contributing to Open Source projects and the successes of the Hydra Project and Fedora. Slides are from Open Repositories 2016 Conference held at Trinity College, Dublin.
Development of a MODS-RDF Cataloguing Tool for Information Professionals CONU...Lucy McKenna
Generating bibliographic records as linked data (LD) offers the opportunity for libraries to publish and interlink metadata on the semantic web (SW). This can expose library resources to a larger audience, increase the use of library materials, and allow for more efficient searches. The Digital Resources and Imaging Services (DRIS) department of the Library of Trinity College Dublin (TCD) hopes to move towards publishing their bibliographic records as LD and, therefore, requires a tool that allows for the creation of records in RDF - a model for representing and exchanging LD on the web as structured data.
Although libraries are publishing LD in increasing quantities there remains many barriers to librarians making full use of the SW, including that many tools used for generating LD are aimed at technical experts. This project explored a means of overcoming some of these barriers through the development a MODS-RDF cataloguing tool for use in the library domain. MODS is a highly flexible XML metadata schema that can be used to catalogue cultural heritage materials, and MODS-RDF is an expression of this schema in RDF.
A user-centred design approach, which focuses on designing an interface from the perspective of its users, was followed when developing the tool. As such, DRIS was involved in all stages of development, including requirements gathering, interface prototyping and design, and usability testing. The results of the first phase of usability testing indicated that many of the initial user requirements were met and that DRIS were interested in developing the interface further. These results are being used to inspire the second iteration of the tool. Ongoing usability testing will be conducted to ensure that the resulting interface meets DRIS’ unique needs.
By developing a tool that allows DRIS to produce MODS-RDF records, the library will be able to interlink with other LD resources. This could allow library users to access a web of related data from a single information search, making the research process more efficient and potentially inspiring new research through the linking of disparate collections.
NCompass Live - January 2, 2014.
http://nlc.nebraska.gov/ncompasslive/
The Bibliographic Framework Initiative, or BIBFRAME, is intended to provide a replacement to the MARC format as an encoding standard for library catalogs. Its aim is to move library data into a Linked Data format, allowing it to interact with other data on the Web. In this session, Emily Nimsakont, the NLC’s Cataloging Librarian, will cover the basics of BIBFRAME, describe what it can provide for users of library catalogs that MARC can’t, and outline what librarians should be aware of regarding this change in the cataloging landscape.
Alphabet soup: CDM, VRA, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF - Why Metadata MattersNew York University
This presentation given to University of Iowa Libraries on Nov. 17, 2014, discussing 1) the alphabet soup of metadata standards, e.g. CDM, VRA, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF, including sample tagging and their applications for digital libraries, and 2) why metadata matters. It does not address metadata issues and tools for metadata creation, extraction, transformation, quality control, syndication and ingest.
The network reshapes the research library collectionlisld
The library collection has been central to library identity and service, however we are now seeing major changes in how libraries help discover, curate and create collections. This is a response to evolving research and learning behaviors in a network environment. This presentation considers trends which are influencing how we think about library curatorial activities and are reshaping their collections. The first direction is the ‘inside-out library’ which is a response to the reorganization of research work by the digital environment. The second is the facilitated collections, which is a response to the reorganization of the information space by the network. The presentation discusses three ways in which we are thinking differently about collections: the inside out collection, the facilitated collection, and the collective collection.
Keynote presentation at the Lita Forum, Albuquerque. Research and learning practices are enacted in technology rich environments. New tools support digital workflows and the volume and variety of research and learning outputs are growing. Libraries are working to support these new environments and to connect their services to them.
The research library: scalable efficiency and scalable learninglisld
As research libraries are being reconfigured in a network environment, two important trends are emerging. The first is to accelerate the sharing of infrastructure, either through collaborative services or with third party providers. The second is to engage more deeply with the research and learning processes of their campuses. As research and learning processes themselves change, the research library has to respond and this makes being responsive and open to learning very important.
Learning the Lingo: Building Foundations for Successful Partnerships and Collaborations upon which Successful Systems Integrations can be Built
Carl Grant, Associate Dean, Knowledge Services & Chief Technology Officer, University of Oklahoma
Social metadata for libraries, archives and museums: Research findings from t...Rose Holley
The presentative gives research findings from the Research Libraries Group (RLG) on Social Metadata Working Group. The group worked from 2009-2010 researching sites that used social media features before making some recommendations to libraries, archives and museums.
Keynote Speaker: Matt Goldner, Executive Director, Cooperative Collection Services, OCLC
Expanding Our Horizons: Reaching for the Limits[PowerPoint]
The future of the library OPAC as a destination information portal is shaky at best. To surface library collections in today's information environment, libraries will have to move toward exposing themselves in multiple locations and through multiple methods. Looking at some of the successful ways OCLC has been able to surface the library's full capacity can give libraries one way to consider their futures.
From local infrastructure to engagement - thinking about the library in the l...lisld
Libraries are rebalancing services and directions so that they are more active in the lives of their users. This presentation frames this discussion. It looks at shifts in user behaviours, collections, and spaces, and describes how OCLC Reseach is helping libraries make these transitions.
This presentation was given at the Minitex ILL Meeting in St Paul on 12 May 2015.
Creating and Sustaining Communities Around Shared Data: The Case of OCLCKaren S Calhoun
Presented by Karen Calhoun at the ALCTS Forum, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, Denver CO, 26 January 2009. Discusses community norms and policies for sharing the data that supports the discovery and delivery of library collections; places these in the context of the broader data sharing environment outside libraries; and analyzes the process and rationale for revising OCLC's Guidelines for the Use and Transfer of Records.
Slides from Richard Green, Chris Arwe (Hull University, Hydra Project) David Wilcox (Fedora) Anders Conrad Sparre (Royal Library of Denmark) Gregory Markus (Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision/ EuropeanaTech) about European efforts towards building a better FLOSS Community, the benefits of contributing to Open Source projects and the successes of the Hydra Project and Fedora. Slides are from Open Repositories 2016 Conference held at Trinity College, Dublin.
Development of a MODS-RDF Cataloguing Tool for Information Professionals CONU...Lucy McKenna
Generating bibliographic records as linked data (LD) offers the opportunity for libraries to publish and interlink metadata on the semantic web (SW). This can expose library resources to a larger audience, increase the use of library materials, and allow for more efficient searches. The Digital Resources and Imaging Services (DRIS) department of the Library of Trinity College Dublin (TCD) hopes to move towards publishing their bibliographic records as LD and, therefore, requires a tool that allows for the creation of records in RDF - a model for representing and exchanging LD on the web as structured data.
Although libraries are publishing LD in increasing quantities there remains many barriers to librarians making full use of the SW, including that many tools used for generating LD are aimed at technical experts. This project explored a means of overcoming some of these barriers through the development a MODS-RDF cataloguing tool for use in the library domain. MODS is a highly flexible XML metadata schema that can be used to catalogue cultural heritage materials, and MODS-RDF is an expression of this schema in RDF.
A user-centred design approach, which focuses on designing an interface from the perspective of its users, was followed when developing the tool. As such, DRIS was involved in all stages of development, including requirements gathering, interface prototyping and design, and usability testing. The results of the first phase of usability testing indicated that many of the initial user requirements were met and that DRIS were interested in developing the interface further. These results are being used to inspire the second iteration of the tool. Ongoing usability testing will be conducted to ensure that the resulting interface meets DRIS’ unique needs.
By developing a tool that allows DRIS to produce MODS-RDF records, the library will be able to interlink with other LD resources. This could allow library users to access a web of related data from a single information search, making the research process more efficient and potentially inspiring new research through the linking of disparate collections.
NCompass Live - January 2, 2014.
http://nlc.nebraska.gov/ncompasslive/
The Bibliographic Framework Initiative, or BIBFRAME, is intended to provide a replacement to the MARC format as an encoding standard for library catalogs. Its aim is to move library data into a Linked Data format, allowing it to interact with other data on the Web. In this session, Emily Nimsakont, the NLC’s Cataloging Librarian, will cover the basics of BIBFRAME, describe what it can provide for users of library catalogs that MARC can’t, and outline what librarians should be aware of regarding this change in the cataloging landscape.
Alphabet soup: CDM, VRA, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF - Why Metadata MattersNew York University
This presentation given to University of Iowa Libraries on Nov. 17, 2014, discussing 1) the alphabet soup of metadata standards, e.g. CDM, VRA, CCO, METS, MODS, RDF, including sample tagging and their applications for digital libraries, and 2) why metadata matters. It does not address metadata issues and tools for metadata creation, extraction, transformation, quality control, syndication and ingest.
Next Generation Technical Services May 2009 CalhounKaren S Calhoun
This is a long version of the talk I gave for the Spring Assembly of the Librarians Association of the University of California, May 13, 2009, UC Riverside Palm Desert Campus
This presentation was given by Melanie Wacker of Columbia University during the NISO Virtual Conference, BIBFRAME and Real World Applications of Linked Bibliographic Data, held on June 15, 2016
Choosing What to Hold and What to Fold: Database Quality Decisions in Tough ...tfons
Presentation delivered on May 27, 2009 at the NELINET conference "Considering the Catalog and Its Data: Serving the Needs of Users and Staff" [Presented by T. Fons on behalf of Karen Calhoun]
OAIS and It's Applicability for Libraries, Archives, and Digital Repositories...faflrt
ALA/FAFLRT Workshop on Open Archival Information Service (OAIS). Presented by Robin Dale, RLG. Sponsored by ALA Federal and Armed Forces Libraries Roundtable (FAFLRT). Presented on June 16, 2001 at the ALA Annual Conference.
Doing More with Less:The Crisis, Cooperation, and the Librarykramsey
The current financial situation has forced many libraries to pay unprecedented attention to how they are organized to achieve their missions. One common thread emerging in the responses is cooperation: those needing to cut costs sharply are finding that they cannot do so incrementally but must instead transform their activities in ways that spread cost and diffuse risk among many partners. The talk will cover some of the opportunities available for transformative institutional collaboration among libraries, including collaborative, open source software development as well as the challenges facing those attempting to collaborate. It will pay particular attention to the question of how to collaborate strategically: that is, how to ensure that collaboration retains or increases a library’s ability to pursue mission, enhance agility, increase sovereignty, and improve sustainability.
What if you ran your library like a bookstore?kramsey
Libraries may have unique missions, but the way we accomplish them has a lot in common with many other businesses and institutions. This presentation will take a look what we can learn from bookstores, public radio, parks and recreation departments and other organizations that could help us reduce costs and improve revenues for libraries. And what could happen if we don’t.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
4. LC Bicentennial Conference
(November 2000): Action Plan
1. Increase the availability of standard records for selected Web
resources.
2. Enhance the access to and display of records for selected Web
resources across multiple systems.
3. Work collaboratively with metadata standards communities to
improve bibliographic control of selected Web resources.
4. Develop automated tools for extracting, creating, harvesting
and maintaining metadata to improve bibliographic control of
selected Web resources.
5. Provide appropriate training/continuing education to improve
bibliographic control of selected Web resources.
6. Support research and development on emerging metadata
standards and address the challenges of interoperability to
improve bibliographic control of selected Web resources.
5. Background: Reports
University of California: Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic
Services for the University of California (Dec. 2005)
http://libraries.universityofcalifornia.edu/sopag/BSTF/Final.pdf
Indiana University: A White Paper on the Future of Cataloging at
Indiana University (Jan. 2006)
http://www.iub.edu/~libtserv/pub/Future_of_Cataloging_White_Paper.pdf
Karen Calhoun: The Changing Nature of the Catalog and its
Integration with Other Discovery Tools (March 2006)
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/calhoun-report-final.pdf
6. Background: Series
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/series.html
LC announces in April 2006 decision to
cease creating series authority records
No prior consultation or warning to library
community
Most LC series will be analyzed, classified
separately, not traced (490)
7. Background:
LC Subject Headings
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/pre_vs_post.html
CPSO study on the use of pre-coordination in LCSH
Recommendation to continue and simplify
Creation of pre-coordinated authority records for
machine manipulation
Proposal to make LCSH freely available on the Web
8. LC Strategic Plan 2008-2013
Goal: Expand and preserve in accessible
form a unified and universal body of
knowledge and creativity.
Goal: Improve our internal and external
customers’ experiences in seamlessly finding
and using Library resources.
Focus on digital resources, preservation,
access to unique collections
9. LC Working Group on the
Future of Bibliographic Control
http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/
Charge:
Present findings on how bibliographic control and other
descriptive practices can effectively support management
of and access to library materials in the evolving
information and technology environment
Recommend ways in which the library community can
collectively move toward achieving this vision
Advise the Library of Congress on its roles and priorities
10.
11. Meetings and Reports
November 2-3, 2006: Inaugural meeting
March 8, 2007: Users and Uses of Bibliographic
Data
May 9, 2007: Structures and Standards for
Bibliographic Data
July 9, 2007: Economics and Organization of
Bibliographic Data
November 13, 2007: Draft report
January 10, 2008: Final report
13. Introduction
“The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative,
decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its
realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector,
and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be
gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly;
and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The
underlying technology that makes this future possible and
necessary—the World Wide Web—is now almost two
decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this
future without delay in order to retain their significance as
information providers.”
14. Guiding Principles
Redefine bibliographic control
Beyond cataloging, distributed, connected
Redefine the bibliographic universe
Commercial, web-enabled, international
Redefine the role of the Library of Congress
Not the national library
15. Themes
Economics: return on investment, incentives
Standards: web, metadata
Cooperation: vendors, publishers, international
Collaboration: dividing the work
Users: different needs, levels of access, search
strategies
“Discovery happens in places not created or controlled by
libraries”—Bob Wolven, Columbia
Research: more, faster, practical (value)
16. Recommendations
1. Increase efficiency of bibliographic production and
maintenance
2. Enhance access to rare, unique, and other special
hidden materials
3. Position technology for the future
4. Position community for the future
5. Strengthen library and information science
profession
17. Recommendation 1:
Efficient Bibliographic Production
Eliminate redundancies
Distribute responsibility for bibliographic
record production
Collaborate on authority record creation and
maintenance
Automation and batch manipulation
18. Recommendation 2:
Access to Special Collections
Priority to cataloging rare and unique
materials
Integrate access tools (finding aids, etc.)
Digitize for broader access
19. Recommendation 3:
Future Technology
Web as infrastructure
Improve standards development process
Evaluate standards for ROI (make business
case for RDA)
20. Recommendation 4:
Position for the Future
Design for multiple users (people, vendors,
systems)
Test and implement FRBR
Optimize and simplify LCSH
21. Recommendation 5:
Strengthen LIS Profession
Build an evidence base to provide data
Design LIS education for future needs
Share educational materials freely online
Develop sustainable continuing education
program
22. Deanna Marcum at ALA Midwinter
New ideas in report
Incentives for sharing bibliographic data
Examine economic models
Internationalize authority files
Controversial recommendations
Priority to special collections
More flexible metadata carrier (not MARC)
Standards focus on ROI
Suspend work on RDA
23. What Next for LC?
LC forming groups to analyze and make recommendations
Adopt now
Adopt later
Study more
Do not adopt
Pledge
Respond in writing publicly to every recommendation by ALA
Annual 2008
Consult with library community about implications
Meet periodically with Working Group to discuss progress
Include a timetable and implementation plans in strategic plan
24. What Next for Us?
Many recommendations assigned to “All”
PCC
OCLC
WorldCat Local
Next Generation pilot: ONIX-MARC
ALCTS Task Group on the LC Working Group
Report
Lobby for increased funding for LC?
25. RDA Update
Current status
http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/jsc/
LC plans
Implementation timeline
Getting ready
26. RDA: Current Status
Work proceeding
Committee of Principals (CoP) affirming support and
coordinated implementation
Reorganization to align with FRBR model (user
tasks, entities, attributes, relationships)
Drafts out for comment
DCMI/RDA Task Force
RDA/MARC Working Group
27. RDA: LC Plans
Currently on hold pending analysis of
recommendations in LCWG Report
CoP encourages LC to continue work
Joint Steering Committee meeting in April
28. RDA: Implementation Timeline
Full draft: July 2008
First release: early 2009
Online prototype in early testing
Implementation: late 2009
29. RDA: Getting Ready
RDA Update Forums (ALA)
ALCTS/CCS RDA Implementation Task Force
FRBR and FRAD
Monitor lists and blogs
AUTOCAT
RDA-L
http://www.mail-archive.com/rda-l@infoserv.nlc-
bnc.ca/maillist.html
Training
30. “Future of Cataloging”
Christine Schwartz, Cataloging Futures blog,
recently summarized Roy Tennant's article, The
New Cataloger, from 2006. He described what the
future tasks of catalogers might look like:
Working with a variety of non-MARC metadata
Working with new cataloging tools
Harvesting, the automated gathering of metadata
Normalizing and enriching batches of metadata
Quality control of automated processes
31. My Questions/Thoughts
Staffing
Past trend: fewer professionals, more support staff
Now: easy tasks automated; controlled vocabularies,
metadata, original cataloging of rare materials, data
manipulation, etc., need higher skills
Economics
What is incentive for vendors to share proprietary data?
Who will supply “incentives” in report for more
collaboration?
What will be the cost to individual libraries of LC’s
withdrawal?
32. My Questions/Thoughts
Who will coordinate all this collaboration?
Future of the ILS
Relationships, collections: it’s not about
individual catalog records