3. Structured instrument criticality reclassification led to an
88% reduction in maintenance manhours required
Advisian 3
The challenge
• Instrument planned maintenance costs were too high
• ISO 9000 accreditation had made the planned maintenance program very expensive
• Any changes would need to satisfy the UK offshore regulators prior to any
implementation
What we did
• A thorough examination of the instrumentation with a view to their:
— Criticality
— Dominant failure modes
— Target availability
• Developed a completely new program with the asset team
• Managed the process with the HSE offshore safety branch to ensure regulatory
compliance and acceptance
• Implemented the changes offshore
Benefits
• Reduced the instrumentation planned maintenance
program from 15,000 man-hours a year to just
1,800 man-hours a year
• Reduction in POB
• A marked reduction in the number of spurious trips
Element 1: asset register criticality ranking
4. Most maintenance programs are built from OEM
manuals – now they too are discovering their flaws
Advisian 4
The challenge
• Their business model for industrial turbine packages has been redefined by the move
to long-term service agreements (LTSAs) where they now pay for the cost of
maintenance.
What we did
• The client asked Advisian to assist in reviewing and redefining the work programs to
ensure that each task was sensible, defensible and occurred at the appropriate interval.
• The analysis also examined possibilities to make design changes to facilitate better
maintenance.
• In all, the engagement delivered a valuable reduction in the maintenance programme,
coupled with a new approach to control and protection philosophy, allowing the client
to de-tune overly sensitive instrumentation to provide the enduser with alarms as
opposed to trips.
Element 2: Equipment maintenance strategies
Benefits
• 56% reduction in maintenance labour costs for
8,000 running hour interventions
• Availability improvements of at least 1.5 days per
year per gas turbine from planned maintenance
alone
• A reduction in control and instrumentation engineer
resource requirement of around 60%
5. Sometimes a “compliance culture” hides true
levels of risk
Advisian 5
The challenge
• Following the Buncefield disaster, operators rushed to implement large PM
programs
• Our client felt their system was clogged up by tasks of little or no value
• An RCM revealed the opportunity to remove 88% of tasks on part of the site
• Six months after the RCM nothing had changed
What we did
• Revealed to the client how the link between work orders issued, planning,
executing and reporting had broken down
• Built a new process for planning, reporting and measuring achievement
• Implemented the new system at the largest of their seven sites
Benefits
• Plan attainment grew from less than 30% to more than 70% within six weeks
• Corporate risk profile lowered due to the audit trail now existing between jobs
issued and jobs done
Element 3: Work management
6. Shutdown programmes have often grown from a
historical perspective with little scrutiny or challenge
Advisian 6
The challenge
• This client operates a vast onshore oilfield via a network of gathering centers
• Each gathering centre had a planned shutdown programme that sacrificed 44
days of production in every four year cycle
What we did
• We led an RCM review of the equipment which was the rate determining step
behind each shutdown intervention
• We examined how some simple design changes would have an impact on
shutdown duration
• Revealed that the initial program emerged from equipment manuals written in
the 1960s and that subsequent technological improvements had not been
taken
into account
• Built a program to change the shutdown content planning
Benefits
• 44 days per four years reduced to just 10 days
per four years – an improvement of 77%
• Planned flaring reduced by 65%
• Project awarded Chairman’s Prize for HSE
Element 4: Shutdown management
7. Reliability problems are rarely just maintenance
problems and require a multi-disciplinary approach
Advisian 7
The Challenge
• This client had a 3 x 50% fleet of gas export booster compressors whose reliability
was unacceptably low.
• The machines were “identical,” yet their performance appeared markedly different.
• Previous attempts to improve performance had not worked.
What we did
• We led an RCM review with a user group drawn from operations, maintenance and
process engineering functions.
• Conducted a detailed analysis of the production, maintenance and condition
monitoring data coupled with interviews in the field.
• Revealed commissioning errors, start-up procedure problems, inappropriate
maintenance and incorrect system knowledge.
• Built a programme to tackle performance.
Element 5: Reliability improvement process
Benefits
• Trips reduced by 75%
• Unscheduled downtime eliminated
• Fleet availability now exceeding delivery
target
• Awarded “Project of the year” by gas director
8. For more information
Advisian 8
Alex Buehler
Director of Operations, USA
E: alex.buehler@advisian.com
P: + 1 770 235 1744
Tony Geraghty
SVP, Reliability Engineering, EMEA
E: anthony.geraghty@advisian.com
P: + 44 (0) 771 734 6660