Takeda California
Assessment of Clonality for Production Cell Lines via
High-Resolution Imaging
Melisa Carpio, MS
May 19, 2015
IBC’s Cell Line Development & Engineering Conference
Takeda California
1
THE FDA MANDATES MONOCLONALITY FOR
ALL COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION CELL LINES
 For recombinant products, the cell
substrate is the transfected cell
containing the desired sequences,
which has been cloned from a single
cell progenitor.” – ICH Q5D
Takeda California
WHY DID WE CHOOSE THE CELL METRIC?
 High quality images
 Automatic focusing
 Direct visual reading of whole well
 Unlimited number of data points
 Digital record of cells
 High-throughput
 10 plate incubated stacker
 3-4 minutes per plate
Takeda California
ASSESSMENT STRATEGY
 What were our goals?
 Be able to clearly track growth of a single cell to confluence
 Determine media conditions that fosters growth of single cells
 Reliably deposit single cells into a single well of a 96WP
 How did we achieve our goals?
 Evaluate liquid versus semisolid media for cell tracking
 Screen different media and additives to optimize colony growth
 Examine seeding densities that yield 1 cell/well
Takeda California
UNDESIRABLE CELL MIGRATION IN LIQUID MEDIA
 Images of single cells are clearly observed
 BUT cells tend to migrate during daily handling
Day 0 Day 1
Takeda California
UNDESIRABLE CELL MIGRATION IN LIQUID MEDIA
Day 0
Day 1
Takeda California
DOES SEMI-SOLID MEDIA SOLVE THE PROBLEM?
Semisolid #1 Semisolid #2
Semisolid #3 Semisolid #4
 Significant debris
was present in
three of the four
media tested
 Semisolid #4 was
chosen for further
optimization
Takeda California
CELLS DON’T MIGRATE, BUT GROWTH IS POOR
Day 0 Day 1
Day 2 Day 3
Takeda California
DOES AN ADDITIVE HELP GROWTH?
 Using a known additive did improve growth
 Further optimization is still necessary, however
Cells at D0
Number
Observed*
Colonies at
D19*
0 50 0
1 29 5
> 1 17 5
* values represent averages observed in 96 well plates
Takeda California
A SINGLE CELL CAN BE TRACKED TO CONFLUENCE
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2
Day 3 Day 7 Day 19
Takeda California
COLONIES CAN BE SCALED TO YIELD SIMILAR TITERS
96WP 24WP 6WP SF #1 SF #2 Fed-Batch
Titer from Cell Metric Clones
375 ± 174 mg/L
Titer from Legacy Process
296 ± 208 mg/L
 Scale-up was done to test direct transfer from semi-solid to liquid media
Takeda California
MEDIA OPTIMIZATION TO IMPROVE COLONY GROWTH
Media Condition
Media #1 Only
Media #1 + Additive #1
Media #1 + Additive #2a
Media #1 + Additive #2b
Media #2 Only
Media #2 + Additive #1
Media #2 + Additive #2a
Media #2 + Additive #2b
1 cell/well
Imaging D0, D1,
D2, and every 3-
5 days until D19
Takeda California
Media #1 Only Media #1 + Additive #1
Media #1 + Additive #2a Media #1 + Additive #2b
Takeda California
Media #2 Only Media #2 + Additive #1
Media #2 + Additive #2a Media #2 + Additive #2b
Takeda California
MEDIA #2 + ADDITIVES IMPROVED GROWTH
Media Condition
Colonies from
1 cell/well*
Colonies from
>1 cell/well*
Edge + False
Negatives*
Media #1 Only 0 1 0
Media #1 + Additive #1 5 4 1
Media #1 + Additive #2a 9 8 0
Media #1 + Additive #2b 7 9 0
Media #2 Only 5 11 2
Media #2 + Additive #1 14 15 5
Media #2 + Additive #2a 14 27 13
Media #2 + Additive #2b 12 41 4
* values represent average number of colonies observed in a 96 well plate at Day19
Takeda California
1.0 cell/well 0.75 cells/well
0.50 cells/well 0.25 cells/well
WHAT SEEDING DENSITY IS OPTIMAL FOR 1 CPW?
Takeda California
LOWER SEEDING DENSITIES ARE BETTER
 Both 0.50 and 0.25 cells/well had >50% of the colonies coming from 1
cell/well
Seeding Density
(cells/well)
Colonies from
1 cell/well*
Colonies from
>1 cell/well*
Edge + False
Negatives*
1.0 21 23 13
0.75 17 17 10
0.50 15 9 6
0.25 11 4 2
* values represent average number of colonies observed in a 96 well plate at Day16
Takeda California
VALIDATON: SOME WELLS ARE EASY TO ANALYZE
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 8
Day 0 Day 1 Day 5 Day 19
1cell/well>1cel/well
Takeda California
GROWTH CAN BE TRACKED AT EDGE OF WELL
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2
Day 8 Day 12 Day 16
Takeda California
THE MYSTERIOUSLY APPEARING CELL
Day 0
Day 16
Day 1 Day 2 Day 5
Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 5
Takeda California
TWO CELLS START, ONLY ONE SURVIVES
Day 0 Day 1
Day 5 Day 13
Takeda California
SUMMARY OF INITIAL EVALUATION & NEXT STEPS
 Be able to clearly track growth of a single cell to confluence
 Semi-solid media is being used
 Determine media conditions that fosters growth of single cells
 A Media #2 and additive combination was identified
 Reliably deposit single cells into a single well of a 96WP
 Lowering the cell density increases the number of colonies
coming from 1 cell/well
 Work is on-going to validate the system
 Reduce the occurrence of false negatives
 Is one round of subcloning sufficient?
Takeda California
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 Takeda California
 Bhavya Kadambi
 Elizabeth Stangle
 Sanjay Patel
 Solentim
 Sky Jiang
 Dave Elverd
 Ian Taylor

Assessment of clonality for production cell lines via high resolution imaging

  • 1.
    Takeda California Assessment ofClonality for Production Cell Lines via High-Resolution Imaging Melisa Carpio, MS May 19, 2015 IBC’s Cell Line Development & Engineering Conference
  • 2.
    Takeda California 1 THE FDAMANDATES MONOCLONALITY FOR ALL COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION CELL LINES  For recombinant products, the cell substrate is the transfected cell containing the desired sequences, which has been cloned from a single cell progenitor.” – ICH Q5D
  • 3.
    Takeda California WHY DIDWE CHOOSE THE CELL METRIC?  High quality images  Automatic focusing  Direct visual reading of whole well  Unlimited number of data points  Digital record of cells  High-throughput  10 plate incubated stacker  3-4 minutes per plate
  • 4.
    Takeda California ASSESSMENT STRATEGY What were our goals?  Be able to clearly track growth of a single cell to confluence  Determine media conditions that fosters growth of single cells  Reliably deposit single cells into a single well of a 96WP  How did we achieve our goals?  Evaluate liquid versus semisolid media for cell tracking  Screen different media and additives to optimize colony growth  Examine seeding densities that yield 1 cell/well
  • 5.
    Takeda California UNDESIRABLE CELLMIGRATION IN LIQUID MEDIA  Images of single cells are clearly observed  BUT cells tend to migrate during daily handling Day 0 Day 1
  • 6.
    Takeda California UNDESIRABLE CELLMIGRATION IN LIQUID MEDIA Day 0 Day 1
  • 7.
    Takeda California DOES SEMI-SOLIDMEDIA SOLVE THE PROBLEM? Semisolid #1 Semisolid #2 Semisolid #3 Semisolid #4  Significant debris was present in three of the four media tested  Semisolid #4 was chosen for further optimization
  • 8.
    Takeda California CELLS DON’TMIGRATE, BUT GROWTH IS POOR Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3
  • 9.
    Takeda California DOES ANADDITIVE HELP GROWTH?  Using a known additive did improve growth  Further optimization is still necessary, however Cells at D0 Number Observed* Colonies at D19* 0 50 0 1 29 5 > 1 17 5 * values represent averages observed in 96 well plates
  • 10.
    Takeda California A SINGLECELL CAN BE TRACKED TO CONFLUENCE Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 7 Day 19
  • 11.
    Takeda California COLONIES CANBE SCALED TO YIELD SIMILAR TITERS 96WP 24WP 6WP SF #1 SF #2 Fed-Batch Titer from Cell Metric Clones 375 ± 174 mg/L Titer from Legacy Process 296 ± 208 mg/L  Scale-up was done to test direct transfer from semi-solid to liquid media
  • 12.
    Takeda California MEDIA OPTIMIZATIONTO IMPROVE COLONY GROWTH Media Condition Media #1 Only Media #1 + Additive #1 Media #1 + Additive #2a Media #1 + Additive #2b Media #2 Only Media #2 + Additive #1 Media #2 + Additive #2a Media #2 + Additive #2b 1 cell/well Imaging D0, D1, D2, and every 3- 5 days until D19
  • 13.
    Takeda California Media #1Only Media #1 + Additive #1 Media #1 + Additive #2a Media #1 + Additive #2b
  • 14.
    Takeda California Media #2Only Media #2 + Additive #1 Media #2 + Additive #2a Media #2 + Additive #2b
  • 15.
    Takeda California MEDIA #2+ ADDITIVES IMPROVED GROWTH Media Condition Colonies from 1 cell/well* Colonies from >1 cell/well* Edge + False Negatives* Media #1 Only 0 1 0 Media #1 + Additive #1 5 4 1 Media #1 + Additive #2a 9 8 0 Media #1 + Additive #2b 7 9 0 Media #2 Only 5 11 2 Media #2 + Additive #1 14 15 5 Media #2 + Additive #2a 14 27 13 Media #2 + Additive #2b 12 41 4 * values represent average number of colonies observed in a 96 well plate at Day19
  • 16.
    Takeda California 1.0 cell/well0.75 cells/well 0.50 cells/well 0.25 cells/well WHAT SEEDING DENSITY IS OPTIMAL FOR 1 CPW?
  • 17.
    Takeda California LOWER SEEDINGDENSITIES ARE BETTER  Both 0.50 and 0.25 cells/well had >50% of the colonies coming from 1 cell/well Seeding Density (cells/well) Colonies from 1 cell/well* Colonies from >1 cell/well* Edge + False Negatives* 1.0 21 23 13 0.75 17 17 10 0.50 15 9 6 0.25 11 4 2 * values represent average number of colonies observed in a 96 well plate at Day16
  • 18.
    Takeda California VALIDATON: SOMEWELLS ARE EASY TO ANALYZE Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 8 Day 0 Day 1 Day 5 Day 19 1cell/well>1cel/well
  • 19.
    Takeda California GROWTH CANBE TRACKED AT EDGE OF WELL Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 8 Day 12 Day 16
  • 20.
    Takeda California THE MYSTERIOUSLYAPPEARING CELL Day 0 Day 16 Day 1 Day 2 Day 5 Day 0 Day 1 Day 2 Day 5
  • 21.
    Takeda California TWO CELLSSTART, ONLY ONE SURVIVES Day 0 Day 1 Day 5 Day 13
  • 22.
    Takeda California SUMMARY OFINITIAL EVALUATION & NEXT STEPS  Be able to clearly track growth of a single cell to confluence  Semi-solid media is being used  Determine media conditions that fosters growth of single cells  A Media #2 and additive combination was identified  Reliably deposit single cells into a single well of a 96WP  Lowering the cell density increases the number of colonies coming from 1 cell/well  Work is on-going to validate the system  Reduce the occurrence of false negatives  Is one round of subcloning sufficient?
  • 23.
    Takeda California ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS  TakedaCalifornia  Bhavya Kadambi  Elizabeth Stangle  Sanjay Patel  Solentim  Sky Jiang  Dave Elverd  Ian Taylor