Gestural communication, like pointing, involves understanding complex intentions and social cooperation. Pointing requires comprehending shared context and attitudes to determine a pointer's intended referent and motive. While apes follow points, they may lack understanding of joint attention, cooperative intention, or the communicative intention for informing/helping. Infant pointing develops from 12 months and involves intentions like requesting objects, sharing experiences, and conveying needs.
What does it mean to be 'a common brand'? An exploration of how the social nature of the internet fundamentally changes how, where and why meaning is created, and what people who work with brands can do as a result. Also, revealed for the first time, the answer to how much the internet weighs...
A Good Parent (500 Words) - PHDessay.com. Parenting Essay. (PDF) What Makes a Good Parent?. Sample Parent Essays For High School Applications - — How to Write a .... Characteristics of a Good Parent. Essay my parents my inspiration. What Makes a Good Parent? Free Essay Example. Essential characteristics good parent essay. How to be good parent! Check out more tips on www.howtipz.com .... What qualities make a good parent essay - courseworkbook.x.fc2.com. Essay about my parents.. - YouTube. Essay on single parent family. Describe the ideal parent-child relationship essay - writefiction581 .... How To Be A Good Parent Essay Example for Free - 1181 Words | EssayPay. Good Parenting Tips Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... Sample Parent Essays For High School Applications.
What does it mean to be 'a common brand'? An exploration of how the social nature of the internet fundamentally changes how, where and why meaning is created, and what people who work with brands can do as a result. Also, revealed for the first time, the answer to how much the internet weighs...
A Good Parent (500 Words) - PHDessay.com. Parenting Essay. (PDF) What Makes a Good Parent?. Sample Parent Essays For High School Applications - — How to Write a .... Characteristics of a Good Parent. Essay my parents my inspiration. What Makes a Good Parent? Free Essay Example. Essential characteristics good parent essay. How to be good parent! Check out more tips on www.howtipz.com .... What qualities make a good parent essay - courseworkbook.x.fc2.com. Essay about my parents.. - YouTube. Essay on single parent family. Describe the ideal parent-child relationship essay - writefiction581 .... How To Be A Good Parent Essay Example for Free - 1181 Words | EssayPay. Good Parenting Tips Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... Sample Parent Essays For High School Applications.
Running title Communication disorders 3NameUniversit.docxagnesdcarey33086
Running title: Communication disorders 3
Name:
University:
Professor:
Date:
Explain how understanding the conceptual model of working memory helps you in selecting strategies to take in helping a child that may have a communicative disorder. Please give an example of a strategy that you might use with a child with a specific communicative disorder.
Construct a scenario of a team approach that could be developed when working with a child that has a specific communicative disorder. You should identify the communicative disorder that the child has in this scenario and provide research and techniques/strategies that are known to be effective with this type of communicative disorder.
Evaluate the benefits for family and children in being connected to organizations associated with a specific communicative disorder. These organizations can be found from the list in your chapter reading or from an internet search.
Explain how understanding the conceptual model of working memory helps you in selecting strategies to take in helping a child that may have a communicative disorder. Please give an example of a strategy that you might use with a child with a specific communicative disorder.
Understanding the communication disorder is quite convenient towards the selection of the best mode of commiunication with a disabled child. (Sigman & Norman,1999). When am able to know some causes of communication disorders that the child is facing and this includes hearing loss in a child, neurological disorders, brain injury, mental retardation, drug abuse, physical impairments such as cleft lip or palate, emotional or psychiatric autism, and developmental disorders (Howlin, Mawhood, & Rutter, 2000), I will be able to freely interact with the child with the disorder without making him feel bad. This might include the use of include joint attention, imitation, and toy play to socialize with the autistic disorder. (Adamson & Bakeman,1985,1991)
At 14 years, 8 months of age, Sam spontaneously imparted his aims, through nonverbal means, which included outward appearances (e.g., looking to staff to demand a nibble), physical motions (e.g., pulling his educators' hands to his head to demand a head rub), and more ordinary signals (e.g., indicating solicitation and a head shake to reject). He likewise utilized offbeat nonverbal flags that included gnawing his hand to impart positive and negative feelings and squeezing to dissent. Sam every so often utilized a couple of verbal word rough guesses (e.g., "no," "yes," "more," and "inflatable"), the sign for "help," and picture images on a voice yield gadget. Be that as it may, he commonly utilized these images latently, regularly because of a direct verbal brief from his social accomplice. From research, this shows that this is Autistic Disorder due to the fact that, he uses a variety of communication modes including speech, facial expressions, conventional gestures (e.g., pointing), unconvent.
Moving media influences on children’s linguistic behaviourKooshna Gupta
With the technological age, accessibility to the moving image is almost at the reach of each and every child in the society. “The presence and intensity of media influences [...] are increasingly recognized as an important part of the social ecology of children and youth, and these influences have become more visible and volatile in recent decades.” (Jowett & Fuller-Seeler, 1996). Nowadays, with all the three-dimensional animations and better quality of images and sounds, kids are more attracted towards the motion picture and while enjoying it, they can easily linked the dialogues with its concept. Ultimately, the hearing and visualization accumulated during these sessions shape their linguistic behaviour as well as their social attitude. Children have the tendency of imitating their favourite cartoon characters and Bollywood heroes, which influences their language lexically and phonologically. As a result, unconsciously, they include speech acts from these characters into their daily communication and sometimes kids idealize them to such an extent that they will copy their dressing and speaking styles by adjusting their accent and tone. This paper will study the linguistic and cultural behaviour of kids under the influence of the moving media and how it contributes in building their cultural and linguistic personality both positively and negatively.
What is Home? Essay
Definition Essay
What Is A Family? Essay
Perseverance Essay
Essay on Team Player
Lifestyles Essay examples
Essay about Defining Maturity
Defining Success
Definition Essay
What is a Community? Essay example
Making the vocabulary connection in middle schoolsKeith Pruitt
This presentation discusses methods and problems in academic language at middle and high school. The presentation suggests several methods of working with students to enrich academic language.
Any Topic For Essay. 33 Argumentative Essay Topics for Middle School Journal...Noel Brooks
31 Persuasive Essay Topics • JournalBuddies.com. Top 100 extended essay topics by Extended Essay - Issuu. Best Good Topics In Narrative Essay Writing - PerfectEssay. College Essay: Topic english essay. Introduction 101: How to Engage the Reader from the First Sentence. How to Write a Good Topic Sentence (with Sample Topic Sentences .... 007 Write Good Topic Sentence Step Version Essay Example One Paragraph .... 100 Easy Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas with Research Links and Sample .... Essay Topic Ideas | Topic Ideas of Essay for Students and Children in .... 33 Argumentative Essay Topics for Middle School • JournalBuddies.com .... example essay topics. Imposing Easy Essay Topics ~ Thatsnotus. Essay Topics. College essay template. FREE 11+ College Essay Samples in MS Word. 2022 .... English Essay Writing Help: free Samples and List of Topics. 141 Topics For Writing That Are Deep And Thoughtful - Kids n Clicks. How to Write an Engaging Topic Sentence for Your Essay by .... Different Topics for Essays and Speeches - Topics to write an essay on .... 10 Tips to Write an Essay and Actually Enjoy It. 006 Essay Example Writing Topics With ~ Thatsnotus. list of research topics - Jessica Reid. 013 Good Persuasive Essay Topics Example ~ Thatsnotus. ⚡ Essay topics for children. 149 Child Development Topic Ideas to Write .... Hundreds of Argumentative Essay Topics for Any Assignment • 7ESL. 025 Good Topics For Argumentative Essay Example ~ Thatsnotus. Amazing Interesting Essay Topics ~ Thatsnotus. Interesting Topics to Write About | Writing prompts for kids .... 50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics. How to Write an Essay In English - GetLitt!. Follow this link to get list of narrative essay topics Ireland http .... Opinion Essay Topics. Beautiful Best Persuasive Essay Topics ~ Thatsnotus. 014 Essay Example English Topic Creative Writing Topics For Grade .... About Me Paper Example Unique Short Essay Writing Help topics Examples ... Any Topic For Essay
EASY TUTORIAL OF HOW TO USE CAPCUT BY: FEBLESS HERNANEFebless Hernane
CapCut is an easy-to-use video editing app perfect for beginners. To start, download and open CapCut on your phone. Tap "New Project" and select the videos or photos you want to edit. You can trim clips by dragging the edges, add text by tapping "Text," and include music by selecting "Audio." Enhance your video with filters and effects from the "Effects" menu. When you're happy with your video, tap the export button to save and share it. CapCut makes video editing simple and fun for everyone!
Running title Communication disorders 3NameUniversit.docxagnesdcarey33086
Running title: Communication disorders 3
Name:
University:
Professor:
Date:
Explain how understanding the conceptual model of working memory helps you in selecting strategies to take in helping a child that may have a communicative disorder. Please give an example of a strategy that you might use with a child with a specific communicative disorder.
Construct a scenario of a team approach that could be developed when working with a child that has a specific communicative disorder. You should identify the communicative disorder that the child has in this scenario and provide research and techniques/strategies that are known to be effective with this type of communicative disorder.
Evaluate the benefits for family and children in being connected to organizations associated with a specific communicative disorder. These organizations can be found from the list in your chapter reading or from an internet search.
Explain how understanding the conceptual model of working memory helps you in selecting strategies to take in helping a child that may have a communicative disorder. Please give an example of a strategy that you might use with a child with a specific communicative disorder.
Understanding the communication disorder is quite convenient towards the selection of the best mode of commiunication with a disabled child. (Sigman & Norman,1999). When am able to know some causes of communication disorders that the child is facing and this includes hearing loss in a child, neurological disorders, brain injury, mental retardation, drug abuse, physical impairments such as cleft lip or palate, emotional or psychiatric autism, and developmental disorders (Howlin, Mawhood, & Rutter, 2000), I will be able to freely interact with the child with the disorder without making him feel bad. This might include the use of include joint attention, imitation, and toy play to socialize with the autistic disorder. (Adamson & Bakeman,1985,1991)
At 14 years, 8 months of age, Sam spontaneously imparted his aims, through nonverbal means, which included outward appearances (e.g., looking to staff to demand a nibble), physical motions (e.g., pulling his educators' hands to his head to demand a head rub), and more ordinary signals (e.g., indicating solicitation and a head shake to reject). He likewise utilized offbeat nonverbal flags that included gnawing his hand to impart positive and negative feelings and squeezing to dissent. Sam every so often utilized a couple of verbal word rough guesses (e.g., "no," "yes," "more," and "inflatable"), the sign for "help," and picture images on a voice yield gadget. Be that as it may, he commonly utilized these images latently, regularly because of a direct verbal brief from his social accomplice. From research, this shows that this is Autistic Disorder due to the fact that, he uses a variety of communication modes including speech, facial expressions, conventional gestures (e.g., pointing), unconvent.
Moving media influences on children’s linguistic behaviourKooshna Gupta
With the technological age, accessibility to the moving image is almost at the reach of each and every child in the society. “The presence and intensity of media influences [...] are increasingly recognized as an important part of the social ecology of children and youth, and these influences have become more visible and volatile in recent decades.” (Jowett & Fuller-Seeler, 1996). Nowadays, with all the three-dimensional animations and better quality of images and sounds, kids are more attracted towards the motion picture and while enjoying it, they can easily linked the dialogues with its concept. Ultimately, the hearing and visualization accumulated during these sessions shape their linguistic behaviour as well as their social attitude. Children have the tendency of imitating their favourite cartoon characters and Bollywood heroes, which influences their language lexically and phonologically. As a result, unconsciously, they include speech acts from these characters into their daily communication and sometimes kids idealize them to such an extent that they will copy their dressing and speaking styles by adjusting their accent and tone. This paper will study the linguistic and cultural behaviour of kids under the influence of the moving media and how it contributes in building their cultural and linguistic personality both positively and negatively.
What is Home? Essay
Definition Essay
What Is A Family? Essay
Perseverance Essay
Essay on Team Player
Lifestyles Essay examples
Essay about Defining Maturity
Defining Success
Definition Essay
What is a Community? Essay example
Making the vocabulary connection in middle schoolsKeith Pruitt
This presentation discusses methods and problems in academic language at middle and high school. The presentation suggests several methods of working with students to enrich academic language.
Any Topic For Essay. 33 Argumentative Essay Topics for Middle School Journal...Noel Brooks
31 Persuasive Essay Topics • JournalBuddies.com. Top 100 extended essay topics by Extended Essay - Issuu. Best Good Topics In Narrative Essay Writing - PerfectEssay. College Essay: Topic english essay. Introduction 101: How to Engage the Reader from the First Sentence. How to Write a Good Topic Sentence (with Sample Topic Sentences .... 007 Write Good Topic Sentence Step Version Essay Example One Paragraph .... 100 Easy Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas with Research Links and Sample .... Essay Topic Ideas | Topic Ideas of Essay for Students and Children in .... 33 Argumentative Essay Topics for Middle School • JournalBuddies.com .... example essay topics. Imposing Easy Essay Topics ~ Thatsnotus. Essay Topics. College essay template. FREE 11+ College Essay Samples in MS Word. 2022 .... English Essay Writing Help: free Samples and List of Topics. 141 Topics For Writing That Are Deep And Thoughtful - Kids n Clicks. How to Write an Engaging Topic Sentence for Your Essay by .... Different Topics for Essays and Speeches - Topics to write an essay on .... 10 Tips to Write an Essay and Actually Enjoy It. 006 Essay Example Writing Topics With ~ Thatsnotus. list of research topics - Jessica Reid. 013 Good Persuasive Essay Topics Example ~ Thatsnotus. ⚡ Essay topics for children. 149 Child Development Topic Ideas to Write .... Hundreds of Argumentative Essay Topics for Any Assignment • 7ESL. 025 Good Topics For Argumentative Essay Example ~ Thatsnotus. Amazing Interesting Essay Topics ~ Thatsnotus. Interesting Topics to Write About | Writing prompts for kids .... 50 Compelling Argumentative Essay Topics. How to Write an Essay In English - GetLitt!. Follow this link to get list of narrative essay topics Ireland http .... Opinion Essay Topics. Beautiful Best Persuasive Essay Topics ~ Thatsnotus. 014 Essay Example English Topic Creative Writing Topics For Grade .... About Me Paper Example Unique Short Essay Writing Help topics Examples ... Any Topic For Essay
EASY TUTORIAL OF HOW TO USE CAPCUT BY: FEBLESS HERNANEFebless Hernane
CapCut is an easy-to-use video editing app perfect for beginners. To start, download and open CapCut on your phone. Tap "New Project" and select the videos or photos you want to edit. You can trim clips by dragging the edges, add text by tapping "Text," and include music by selecting "Audio." Enhance your video with filters and effects from the "Effects" menu. When you're happy with your video, tap the export button to save and share it. CapCut makes video editing simple and fun for everyone!
Storytelling For The Web: Integrate Storytelling in your Design ProcessChiara Aliotta
In this slides I explain how I have used storytelling techniques to elevate websites and brands and create memorable user experiences. You can discover practical tips as I showcase the elements of good storytelling and its applied to some examples of diverse brands/projects..
White wonder, Work developed by Eva TschoppMansi Shah
White Wonder by Eva Tschopp
A tale about our culture around the use of fertilizers and pesticides visiting small farms around Ahmedabad in Matar and Shilaj.
Technoblade The Legacy of a Minecraft Legend.Techno Merch
Technoblade, born Alex on June 1, 1999, was a legendary Minecraft YouTuber known for his sharp wit and exceptional PvP skills. Starting his channel in 2013, he gained nearly 11 million subscribers. His private battle with metastatic sarcoma ended in June 2022, but his enduring legacy continues to inspire millions.
Maximize Your Content with Beautiful Assets : Content & Asset for Landing Page pmgdscunsri
Figma is a cloud-based design tool widely used by designers for prototyping, UI/UX design, and real-time collaboration. With features such as precision pen tools, grid system, and reusable components, Figma makes it easy for teams to work together on design projects. Its flexibility and accessibility make Figma a top choice in the digital age.
Hello everyone! I am thrilled to present my latest portfolio on LinkedIn, marking the culmination of my architectural journey thus far. Over the span of five years, I've been fortunate to acquire a wealth of knowledge under the guidance of esteemed professors and industry mentors. From rigorous academic pursuits to practical engagements, each experience has contributed to my growth and refinement as an architecture student. This portfolio not only showcases my projects but also underscores my attention to detail and to innovative architecture as a profession.
Expert Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Drafting ServicesResDraft
Whether you’re looking to create a guest house, a rental unit, or a private retreat, our experienced team will design a space that complements your existing home and maximizes your investment. We provide personalized, comprehensive expert accessory dwelling unit (ADU)drafting solutions tailored to your needs, ensuring a seamless process from concept to completion.
Book Formatting: Quality Control Checks for DesignersConfidence Ago
This presentation was made to help designers who work in publishing houses or format books for printing ensure quality.
Quality control is vital to every industry. This is why every department in a company need create a method they use in ensuring quality. This, perhaps, will not only improve the quality of products and bring errors to the barest minimum, but take it to a near perfect finish.
It is beyond a moot point that a good book will somewhat be judged by its cover, but the content of the book remains king. No matter how beautiful the cover, if the quality of writing or presentation is off, that will be a reason for readers not to come back to the book or recommend it.
So, this presentation points designers to some important things that may be missed by an editor that they could eventually discover and call the attention of the editor.
2. • Humans communicate with each other in unique ways.
• Most obviously, linguistically, with socially learned,
intersubjectively shared symbols
• But also gesturally. Many of the most important gestures
humans use - e.g., for greeting or leaving, for threatening or
insulting, for agreeing or disagreeing - are also socially learned,
intersubjectively shared, symbolic conventions that vary across
cultures in much the same way as linguistic symbols.
• This requires both ‘mindreading’ (theory of mind) and the
ability/motivation to cooperate with others.
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
3. Outline
• Development
• Theoretical issues
• Pointing
• Pointing basics
• Infants
• Apes
• Children with autism
4. Development of communication in infants
Milestone Average Age (months)
Babbling (e.g., bababa) 7
[?] Joint attention, anticipatory smiles by 8-9
Comprehends a word 9
Showing 9-10
Giving 12
Pointing 12
Comprehends 50 words 13
Produces first word 13 (range 9-16)
Produces 10 words 15 (range 13-19)
Produces 50 words 20 (range 14-24)
Produces word combinations 21 (range 18-24)
Adamson (1996); Carpenter, Nagell, & Tomasello (1998)
5. Development of communication in infants
Milestone Average Age (months)
Babbling (e.g., bababa) 7
[?] Joint attention, anticipatory smiles by 8-9
Comprehends a word 9
Showing 9-10
Giving 12
Pointing 12
Comprehends 50 words 13
Produces first word 13 (range 9-16)
Produces 10 words 15 (range 13-19)
Produces 50 words 20 (range 14-24)
Produces word combinations 21 (range 18-24)
Adamson (1996); Carpenter, Nagell, & Tomasello (1998)
6. Development of communication in infants
Milestone Average Age (months)
Babbling (e.g., bababa) 7
[?] Joint attention, anticipatory smiles by 8-9
Comprehends a word 9
Showing 9-10
Giving 12
Pointing (ToM, coop., complexity) 12
Comprehends 50 words 13
Produces first word 13 (range 9-16)
Produces 10 words 15 (range 13-19)
Produces 50 words 20 (range 14-24)
Produces word combinations 21 (range 18-24)
Adamson (1996); Carpenter, Nagell, & Tomasello (1998)
7. Theoretical debate
• ‘Lean’ versus ‘rich’ interpretations of gestures in 12-month-
old infants and apes
• social-cognitive understanding:
• lean: just trying to achieve certain behavioral effects in others
(see others as causal but not mental agents; influence behavior)
• rich: attempting to influence the intentional/mental states of others
(transfer a mental message; influence mind)
• motivation:
• lean: to achieve own goals (e.g., get object or attention from
adult)
• rich: also for others (inform, help, share); cooperative structure
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
8. Pointing basics
• In itself, pointing is nothing. When faced with a pointing
finger, most animals and very young infants simply stare
at the finger.
• Even understanding the directional nature of pointing is
not enough to comprehend a full communicative act. It
is possible to follow someone’s point but not know what
he means by it. To illustrate:
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
9. Tomasello, Call, & Gluckman (1997);
see Call & Tomasello (2005) for a review
• In a food finding
context, a human
points to one of two
opaque containers.
Apes follow the
point - but then
choose randomly.
10. • Why?
• Either apes don’t know what E was directing their
attention to (exactly what E was referring to), or else they
don’t know why E was directing them to it (what E’s
motive was).
• what: precise referent is not bucket as physical object but bucket
as location of food
• why: not just to show bucket, to inform them of the location
• Pointing can be incomprehensible without some form of
shared context or ‘common ground.’ To correctly identify
the referent, the recipient needs to assume the point is
relevant to something she and the pointer share.
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
16. More pointing basics
• A pointer thus combines an act of reference with an
expression of motive, with the desire that the recipient
attend to both of these, and from this infer the pointer’s
overall intention - what the pointer wants the recipient to
do - by finding some relevance to their common ground.
involves understanding of intentions and shared experience
• This entire process is inherently collaborative:
communicator and recipient work together to identify the
intended referent, as well as the pointer’s larger intention
(Clark, 1996).
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
17. More pointing basics
• Cooperative communicative acts involve an additional type
of intention as well: a communicative intention or intention
about the communication specifically (Grice, 1957; Sperber &
Wilson, 1986).
• When a person points to a tree for me, she not only wants me to
notice the tree, she also wants me to notice her desire that I notice
the tree. This additional tier is necessary to instigate in me the
kinds of relevance inferences required to identify the
communicator's reason for communicating (her motive).
• if instead she leans back and I see the tree, I don’t need to make those
kinds of inferences
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
18. More pointing basics
She intends that I attend to X (and wants us to know this
together) for some reason relevant to our common
ground.
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
19. More pointing basics
She intends that I attend to X (and wants us to know this
together) for some reason relevant to our common
ground.
Apes do have some understanding of others intentions and
attention. Either:
1) do not have a joint attentional frame (common
ground) with the human that enables them to
determine reference; (She’s pointing to the bucket. I’m
searching for the grape – I don’t care about the bucket.)
2) do not understand the communicative intention ,
i.e., that the human wants them to know that she has
an intention with respect to them; or
3) do not understand the informing/helping motive
(cooperative intention) of the human in this situation.
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
21. Complexity of pointing: Adult examples
Standing in line at the bank, one person points for another in the adjacent
line to a scarf she has inadvertently dropped on the floor. Gloss: "You
dropped that."
On a river bank next to a noisy waterfall, a person hands me a book up (I
am on top) for safekeeping as she climbs up. She points to the tip of a
pencil protruding from the book. Gloss: "Don't let this fall out".
In a bar, to a bartender, a person simply points to his empty shot glass.
Gloss: "I'll have another".
In airplane, I am standing up idly near the bathrooms. A man
approaches and points to the bathroom door with a quizzical expression.
Gloss: "Are you waiting for the bathroom?"
One person to another in line, informing them of a gap in the line ahead
of them. Gloss: "Hey. Move up."
I approach my parked car and a truck has it blocked in. I look to the
driver with an apologetic expression and point to my blocked-in car.
Gloss: "Sorry, but you have to move to let me out".
Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
22. Complexity of pointing: Infant examples (11-13 months)
As Dad prepares to leave J points to door.
Mom pouring water; J points to his glass to tell her to pour him some.
Mom tells J not to touch her hot teacup; later he points to it and says "No."
Mom asks where J got something. J points out the door, saying “There.”
J watches as Dad arranges Christmas tree; when Grandpa enters room J
points to tree and says "Oh!"
J bumps his head. When Mom comes he points to offending object.
Points to sky to sound of airplane out the window (can't see).
After eating points to bathroom anticipating going to wash hands.
Mom is looking for magnet. L points to basket of fruit it is hidden in.
L pulled lamp halfway off wall. Dad comes in, L points to show what
happened.
T leads Dad around house by pointing, until they find Mom.
Carpenter et al. (in preparation); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
23. Complexity of infant pointing
• Many motives, meanings
• important because classically infant pointing was thought to
have only two main functions:
• imperative: to request objects
• declarative: to share attention and interest to objects or events
• ape ‘pointing’ apparently only imperative
24. Complexity of pointing: Infant examples (11-13 months)
As Dad prepares to leave J points to door.
Mom pouring water; J points to his glass to tell her to pour him some.
Mom tells J not to touch her hot teacup; later he points to it and says "No."
Mom asks where J got something. J points out the door, saying “There.”
J watches as Dad arranges Christmas tree; when Grandpa enters room J
points to tree and says "Oh!"
J bumps his head. When Mom comes he points to offending object.
Points to sky to sound of airplane out the window (can't see).
After eating points to bathroom anticipating going to wash hands.
Mom is looking for magnet. L points to basket of fruit it is hidden in.
L pulled lamp halfway off wall. Dad comes in, L points to show what
happened.
T leads Dad around house by pointing, until they find Mom.
Carpenter et al. (in preparation); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
25. Complexity of infant pointing
• Many motives, meanings
• important because classically infant pointing is thought to have
only two main functions:
• imperative: to request objects
• declarative: to share attention and interest to objects or events
• ape ‘pointing’ only imperative (?)
• Absent referents
• important because this is taken to be a hallmark of uniquely
human language; also evidence that it is communication on a
mental level
26. Complexity of pointing: Infant examples (11-13 months)
As Dad prepares to leave J points to door.
Mom pouring water; J points to his glass to tell her to pour him some.
Mom tells J not to touch her hot teacup; later he points to it and says "No."
Mom asks where J got something. J points out the door, saying “There.”
J watches as Dad arranges Christmas tree; when Grandpa enters room J
points to tree and says "Oh!"
J bumps his head. When Mom comes he points to offending object.
Points to sky to sound of airplane out the window (can't see).
After eating points to bathroom anticipating going to wash hands.
Mom is looking for magnet. L points to basket of fruit it is hidden in.
L pulled lamp halfway off wall. Dad comes in, L points to show what
happened.
T leads Dad around house by pointing, until they find Mom.
Carpenter et al. (in preparation); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
27. Complexity of infant pointing
• Many motives, meanings
• important because classically infant pointing is thought to have
only two main functions:
• imperative: to request objects
• declarative: to share attention and interest to objects or events
• ape ‘pointing’ only imperative (?)
• Absent referents
• important because this is taken to be a hallmark of uniquely
human language; also evidence that it is communication on a
mental level
• Natural observations are interesting but experiments are
needed.
29. Common ground
• Infants begin participating in joint attentional
engagement by 9 months (more on that tomorrow)
• By 14 months, they can use joint attentional
frames/common ground to interpret others’ points.
30. Behne, Carpenter, & Tomasello (2005)
• 14- to 24-month-olds
• Following a visible
‘hiding’ warm-up, E hid
a toy in one of two
opaque containers.
• E indicated the toy’s
location by pointing or
gazing at the correct
container. Mean % correct responses +/- SE
100
90
80
Even the youngest
70
60
Gaze
infants chose the 50
40
Point
correct container more 30
often than chance.
20
10
0
14 months 18 months 24 months
31. Liebal, Behne, Carpenter, & Tomasello (in preparation)
• 18-month-olds
• In each of two Common Ground
conditions, infants participated in
a different shared activity
(cleaning up or stacking) with an that
adult
adult, then that adult pointed
pointed
(“There!”) at a target object.
• In a third, No Common Ground
condition, to test whether infants
a
were really using common different
ground, infants shared a frame adult
with one adult and then a pointed
different adult pointed (“There!”).
32. Liebal, Behne, Carpenter, & Tomasello (in preparation)
• Even though the adults pointed in
exactly the same way in each
condition, infants interpreted the
point differently depending on the
common ground they shared with
the adult:
In the Common Ground
conditions, infants’ responses
were appropriate to the previous
shared activity.
In the No Common Ground
condition, they continued the
previous activity less than in the
corresponding Common Ground Infants used their common
condition, instead mostly ground with specific partners to
interpreting the new adult’s point interpret their partners’ gestures.
as a declarative.
33. Complexity of infant pointing
• Many motives, meanings
• important because classically infant pointing is thought to have
only two main functions:
• imperative : to request objects
• declarative : to share attention and interest to objects or events
• Infants do point imperatively and declaratively (more on this
tomorrow). They also point to inform others of things they do not
know.
34. Liszkowski, Carpenter, Striano, & Tomasello (2006)
• 12- and 18-month-olds
• Infants watched E repeat an
action (e.g., punching holes)
with a target object.
• The target and a distractor
object were displaced.
• E began looking around. 0.45
Target Distractor
0.4
Proportion of trials with point
Infants pointed to inform the 0.35
adult about the location of the 0.3
object she was looking for. 0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
12 months 18 months
35. Complexity of infant pointing
• Common ground
• Many motives, meanings, including to inform others.
• Absent referents
• important because this is taken to be a hallmark of uniquely
human language; also evidence that it is communication on a
mental level
36. Liszkowski, Carpenter, & Tomasello (submitted)
Referent Present Phase
• 12-month-olds Attend Event Attend Screen
• A puppet appeared; E
attended and emoted
(positively or neutrally) either
to it or to the blank screen on
the other side. After the
puppet disappeared, E
turned to the infant.
In the first phase, infants Referent Absent Phase
pointed more often when E
attended to the screen than
to the puppet (to inform).
Infants also pointed when
the referent was absent,
differentially depending on
how E had reacted before.
37. Complexity of infant pointing
• Common ground
• Many motives, meanings, including to inform others.
• Absent referents
• Understanding of communicative intention (tree example)
38. Behne, Carpenter, & Tomasello (2005): control condition
• E ‘pointed’ or gazed to
the correct container but
in a distracted, non-
communicative manner.
In this condition,
children performed at
chance levels.
39. Theoretical debate
• ‘Lean’ versus ‘rich’ interpretations of gestures in 12-month-
old infants and apes
• social-cognitive understanding:
• lean: just trying to achieve certain behavioral effects in others
(see others as causal but not mental agents; influence behavior)
• rich: attempting to influence the intentional/mental states of others
(transfer a mental message; influence mind)
• motivation:
• lean: to achieve own goals (e.g., get object or attention from
adult)
• rich: also for others (inform, help, share); cooperative structure
Tomasello (in press); Tomasello, Carpenter, & Liszkowski (submitted)
40. Infants
Communication on mental instead of behavioral level
• Evidence (already reviewed) of understanding of attention
and intentions by 12 months
• Absent referents (Liszkowski et al., submitted)
• Misunderstandings
• Shwe & Markman (1997): when 2½-year-olds request
something from an adult, and the adult misunderstands but
gives them what they wanted anyway, they still attempt to
correct the misunderstanding. This suggests that they had
both the goal of getting the object and the goal of having the
adult understand their message or communicative intention.
Prosocial motivations
• to achieve own goals, of course, but also prosocial: to inform
(help), to share.
41. Apes
Communication on mental or behavioral level ?
• Evidence (already reviewed) of understanding of perception
and goals - but not attention and intentions (?)
• not much (if any) gesturing about absent referents in
non-language-trained apes
No prosocial motivations
• to achieve own goals only; no evidence of gesturing to
inform (help others, without benefit for themselves) or
share (tomorrow).
42. Children with autism
Communication on mental or behavioral level ?
• Evidence (already reviewed) of understanding of perception
and goals - but not attention and intentions (?)
• ?
No prosocial motivations
• probably to achieve own goals only; no evidence of
gesturing to share (no studies on informing).
• Also general difficulties with communicative intentions
(e.g., common ground, ‘language of the eyes’; see Sabbagh, 1999,
for a review).
43. Summary
• By 12 months, when they first begin pointing, infants
already show the basics of uniquely human
communication, supporting the ‘rich’ view.
• Support for the social-pragmatic view of language acquisition
(Bruner, Tomasello, etc.)
• More studies are needed, but so far, ‘leaner’
interpretations of communication in apes and children
with autism fit best.
44.
45. Hare and Tomasello (2004) hid food in one of two buckets and then, in one condition,
pointed to the bucket containing the food in order to inform the ape where it was. In this case, as
in previous studies, the apes searched randomly. The novelty was in the second condition. Here
E began by establishing with each ape a competitive relationship over the food, and then later
reached toward one of the two buckets in a vain attempt to open it (the reaching was impeded).
Now, surprisingly, even though the superficial behavior of the human was highly similar to that in
the pointing condition - in both cases the human stretched out his arm toward the correct location
- the apes in this condition suddenly knew where the food was. In this case, the apes had to
discern the goal of the human - to get into that bucket - and then infer why he wanted to do this:
because there is something good inside. This cognitive process is quite complex on its own
terms, but the key point is that it includes none of the crucial elements of shared intentionality
from our analysis of the interpersonal structure of pointing. The apes' understanding of the
human's reaching is of individual goals or intentions toward things, not communicative goals or
intentions toward themselves. There is thus no question of a joint attentional frame or common
ground, or of communicative or referential intentions, or of any assumptions of helpfulness or
other interpersonal motives.
Following Tomasello et al. (2005), we may thus attempt to characterize the essential
elements in the comprehension and expression of human pointing as a communicative act by
viewing them from the perspective of shared intentionality. Whereas apes' understanding of the
goal of a reaching person is essentially an act of individual cognition, humans' understanding that
others are pointing out things for them because of their presumed relevance to some common
ground or joint attentional frame is an act of interpersonal cognition involving shared attention
and knowledge, along with some motive for helping or sharing with others.
46. Mean % correct responses +/- SE
100
90
80
70
60
Gaze
50
Point
40
30
20
10
0
14 months 18 months 24 months
Infants
Chimpanzees
Infants pass this test.
Editor's Notes
Example from Sperber and Wilson (1986): suppose we are sitting on a park bench together, and I lean back because I am tired. This exposes a tree to your line of sight. No inferences follow. But if I lean back and point to the tree for you with an insistent expression, you must attempt to determine why I am doing this (my motive). This generates in you a search for some relevance within our common ground: why does he want me to notice the tree?
Mike Tomasello and colleagues have conducted many studies using the so-called object-choice procedure, in which there are two containers, one of which is baited with a toy (for children) or food (for apes) behind a screen, so the S doesn’t know where it is hidden, and then E gives a cue to the S to see if Ss can use that cue to find the toy/food. For example, E hides a toy in one of these boxes, then points (in an ostensive-communicative way) to the correct container.
In this study, 18-month-old infants cleaned up with an adult by picking up toys and putting them in a basket. At one point the adult stopped and pointed to a ring toy, which infants then picked up and placed in the basket, presumably to help clean up. However, when the adult pointed to this same toy in this same way but in a different context, infants did not pick up the ring toy and put it in the basket; specifically, when the infant and adult were engaged in stacking ring toys on a post, children ignored the basket and brought the ring toy back to stack it on the post. The crucial point is that in both conditions the adult pointed to the same toy in the same way, but the infant extracted a different meaning in the two cases - based on the two different joint attentional frames involved. And the jointness is indeed a crucial component here. Thus, in a control condition, the infant and adult cleaned up exactly as in the shared clean-up condition, but then a second adult who had not shared this context entered the room and pointed toward the ring toy in exactly the same way as the first adult in the other two conditions. In this case infants did not put the toy away into the basket, presumably because the second adult had not shared the cleaning context with them. Rather, because they had no shared frame with this adult, they seemed most often to interpret the new adult's point as a simple invitation to notice and share attention to the toy. Comparison of these different experimental conditions shows quite clearly that infants ’ interpretation of an adult pointing gesture depends on their recently shared experience (joint attention, common ground) with that specific adult. Put Target Object into Basket - overall: Cochran’s Q = 12.25, p < .01 - between conditions (McNemar): Common Ground: Cleaning Up vs. Stacking: p < .01 Common Ground vs. No Common Ground: p < .03 Stacked Target Object - overall: Cochran’s Q = 18.00, p < .01
The crucial point is that in both conditions the adult pointed to the same toy in the same way, but the infant extracted a different meaning in the two cases - based on the two different joint attentional frames involved. And the jointness is indeed a crucial component here. Thus, in a control condition, the infant and adult cleaned up exactly as in the shared clean-up condition, but then a second adult who had not shared this context entered the room and pointed toward the ring toy in exactly the same way as the first adult in the other two conditions. In this case infants did not put the toy away into the basket, presumably because the second adult had not shared the cleaning context with them. Rather, because they had no shared frame with this adult, they seemed most often to interpret the new adult's point as a simple invitation to notice and share attention to the toy. Comparison of these different experimental conditions shows quite clearly that infants ’ interpretation of an adult pointing gesture depends on their recently shared experience (joint attention, common ground) with that specific adult. Put Target Object into Basket - overall: Cochran’s Q = 12.25, p < .01 - between conditions (McNemar): Common Ground: Cleaning Up vs. Stacking: p < .01 Common Ground vs. No Common Ground: p < .03 Stacked Target Object - overall: Cochran’s Q = 18.00, p < .01
In a study with Ulf Liszkovski, we had infants watch as an adult performed some action like punching holes a few times. Then, for example, the adult left to go talk on the phone and while she was gone, an assistant sneaked in and took her hole puncher – the target object – as well as another distractor object and placed them on these platforms behind E. When E returned, she picked up her paper ready to punch some more holes but couldn’t find the hole puncher and began searching for it.
14-month-old infants have no trouble with this procedure, as you might expect. It seems SO easy – you’re actually telling children where the thing is so it’s no wonder they can do it. But it’s actually not that easy a task: chimpanzees just don’t get it. They perform at chance in this condition. They follow the E’s point to the correct container – that’s not the problem – they just stop there and apparently don’t take the cue as a cooperative, communicative attempt to help them. However, Brian Hare and Mike Tomasello have shown that if you use a competitive cue instead of a cooperative one – the E previously tried to get the food for himself, and in the test trials reached effortfully (but unsuccessfully) to the correct container instead of pointing cooperatively to it, chimpanzees suddenly can pass this test. So infants do well in a cooperative setting, seeing the communication as cooperation, and chimpanzees don’t – they only understand the competitive version.