Can you have liberty while maintaining security
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•295 views
The document discusses security versus liberty after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It provides background on the attacks, how people felt scared and wanted to blame someone. The US government passed the Patriot Act to improve surveillance of potential threats but it also threatens civil liberties. Maintaining security through laws like the Patriot Act can be at odds with preserving individual liberties.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
American gov
The document discusses the concepts of security, liberty, and the Patriot Act. It defines security as protection from harm and liberty as individuals having control over their own actions. It explains that the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies to gather intelligence and monitor financial transactions as well as immigration. The document concludes that liberty can be maintained with security as long as the security laws do not interfere with individual rights and activities, but that security can become a form of permanent oppression, as demonstrated by the Patriot Act, if it is used as a way to control people under the guise of protecting them.
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement. Specifically, it reduced restrictions on searching communications and financial records and broadened the definition of terrorism. While intended to prevent further attacks, the Patriot Act has been criticized for compromising civil liberties and privacy in its application of expanded government powers. Overall, the document discusses the security versus liberty debate in the context of the Patriot Act and its impact on balancing those priorities after 9/11.
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in October 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Its stated purpose was to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies. Some key provisions included allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records like library records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist activities. The act was controversial due to concerns that it weakened civil liberties and increased government intrusion into people's privacy.
The Patriot Act
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 following the September 11th terrorist attacks. It allowed for greater surveillance and investigative powers for law enforcement agencies. There was concern the act went too far in reducing civil liberties and privacy protections in the name of national security. The act remains controversial with debates around when or if it will ever be allowed to expire.
Usa Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act was passed in 2001 as a response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It made several controversial changes to surveillance laws that granted the government expanded powers to monitor communications and financial and medical records. While intended to help prevent terrorism, many felt certain provisions violated civil liberties and privacy protections. The act faced several legal challenges over its most controversial aspects and their application in cases of suspected but ultimately wrongful terrorism accusations.
Us.2.Am.4.6
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government and ensures that any warrants are judicially sanctioned and based on probable cause. It was added to the Constitution to restrict the government's power and protect people's privacy and property rights. Today, it continues to guarantee these privacy rights for all Americans.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to a fair, public and speedy trial by an impartial jury, as well as other fair trial rights like confronting witnesses, getting witnesses to testify for the defense, and legal counsel. It was added to ensure people received fair trials and to prevent unfair prosecutions. These rights still apply today and ensure all people receive justice through a fair trial process.
Bill of rights article iii; section 3 to 6
This document summarizes key sections of the Philippine Bill of Rights. Section 3 discusses the inviolability of privacy and communications except by lawful court order or for public safety. Section 4 protects freedom of speech, expression, press, assembly, and the right to petition. Section 5 establishes separation of church and state. Section 6 protects liberty of abode and travel except as prescribed by law for national security, public safety, or public health.
Covert government surveillance
This document discusses the history of government surveillance in the United States and debates the balance between safety and privacy. It outlines several covert surveillance programs implemented since the 1890s, most of which were found to violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches. While surveillance has helped catch some criminals and terrorists, it has also spied on innocent citizens. The document argues we must determine common ground between accountability for surveillance and protecting individual privacy.
Recommended
American gov
The document discusses the concepts of security, liberty, and the Patriot Act. It defines security as protection from harm and liberty as individuals having control over their own actions. It explains that the Patriot Act expanded the authority of law enforcement agencies to gather intelligence and monitor financial transactions as well as immigration. The document concludes that liberty can be maintained with security as long as the security laws do not interfere with individual rights and activities, but that security can become a form of permanent oppression, as demonstrated by the Patriot Act, if it is used as a way to control people under the guise of protecting them.
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It aimed to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement. Specifically, it reduced restrictions on searching communications and financial records and broadened the definition of terrorism. While intended to prevent further attacks, the Patriot Act has been criticized for compromising civil liberties and privacy in its application of expanded government powers. Overall, the document discusses the security versus liberty debate in the context of the Patriot Act and its impact on balancing those priorities after 9/11.
The patriot act
The Patriot Act was passed by Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush in October 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. Its stated purpose was to strengthen national security by expanding the surveillance and investigative powers of law enforcement agencies. Some key provisions included allowing roving wiretaps, searches of business records like library records, and conducting surveillance of individuals suspected of terrorist activities. The act was controversial due to concerns that it weakened civil liberties and increased government intrusion into people's privacy.
The Patriot Act
The Patriot Act was passed in 2001 following the September 11th terrorist attacks. It allowed for greater surveillance and investigative powers for law enforcement agencies. There was concern the act went too far in reducing civil liberties and privacy protections in the name of national security. The act remains controversial with debates around when or if it will ever be allowed to expire.
Usa Patriot Act
The USA Patriot Act was passed in 2001 as a response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. It made several controversial changes to surveillance laws that granted the government expanded powers to monitor communications and financial and medical records. While intended to help prevent terrorism, many felt certain provisions violated civil liberties and privacy protections. The act faced several legal challenges over its most controversial aspects and their application in cases of suspected but ultimately wrongful terrorism accusations.
Us.2.Am.4.6
The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government and ensures that any warrants are judicially sanctioned and based on probable cause. It was added to the Constitution to restrict the government's power and protect people's privacy and property rights. Today, it continues to guarantee these privacy rights for all Americans.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the right to a fair, public and speedy trial by an impartial jury, as well as other fair trial rights like confronting witnesses, getting witnesses to testify for the defense, and legal counsel. It was added to ensure people received fair trials and to prevent unfair prosecutions. These rights still apply today and ensure all people receive justice through a fair trial process.
Bill of rights article iii; section 3 to 6
This document summarizes key sections of the Philippine Bill of Rights. Section 3 discusses the inviolability of privacy and communications except by lawful court order or for public safety. Section 4 protects freedom of speech, expression, press, assembly, and the right to petition. Section 5 establishes separation of church and state. Section 6 protects liberty of abode and travel except as prescribed by law for national security, public safety, or public health.
Covert government surveillance
This document discusses the history of government surveillance in the United States and debates the balance between safety and privacy. It outlines several covert surveillance programs implemented since the 1890s, most of which were found to violate the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches. While surveillance has helped catch some criminals and terrorists, it has also spied on innocent citizens. The document argues we must determine common ground between accountability for surveillance and protecting individual privacy.
Final presentation rev 1 - USA Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed 45 days after 9/11 to enhance domestic security and increase surveillance powers. It impacted laws around intelligence gathering, immigration, and more. While proponents argued it granted needed powers to fight terrorism, critics said it infringed on civil liberties. There have been ongoing legal challenges around its scope and application. As time has passed, there are calls to reevaluate the act and ensure powers are not abused.
USA Patriot Act
This document is the text of H.R. 3162, also known as the USA PATRIOT Act, which was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Act aims to deter and punish terrorist acts by enhancing domestic security, surveillance procedures, and law enforcement investigative tools related to terrorism, computer fraud/abuse, and money laundering. It also aims to protect U.S. borders and preserve immigration benefits for victims of terrorism. The Act contains several titles that address these issues across 426 sections.
153777064 transcript-of-wiki leaks-press-conference-on-edward-snowden’s-exit-...
This document summarizes a Wikileaks press conference regarding Edward Snowden's exit from Hong Kong on June 23rd, 2013. The speakers discuss the legal issues surrounding Snowden's application for asylum, including his protections as a whistleblower under international law. They condemn U.S. government attempts to interfere with Snowden's asylum application and calls to extradite him. The speakers argue the more important issue is the massive global surveillance programs revealed by Snowden, and see his and Bradley Manning's cases as part of a pattern of retaliation against whistleblowers by the Obama administration.
Patriot Act
The document discusses safety, liberty, and terrorism. It provides definitions of safety and liberty. It describes how people felt unsafe after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The US government passed the Patriot Act to increase security but also took away some liberties. The Patriot Act expanded the government's surveillance powers. While the Act aimed to increase security, it reduced liberties as warned by Benjamin Franklin's quote about trading liberty for safety.
Executive Order Lecture by Cynthia Farina
Cornell Law Professor Cynthia R. Farina gave an informal talk on executive orders on April 9, 2009. The talk was organized by the Cornell Law School chapter of the National Security and Law Society.
Freedoms Forsaken
The document discusses how in response to terrorist attacks like 9/11, the government has passed legislation like the Patriot Act and FISA that expand surveillance powers but may infringe on civil liberties. It examines several court cases where the State Secrets privilege was used to dismiss lawsuits around warrantless wiretapping programs. While greater security is important, especially during times of crisis, balancing it with civil liberties is challenging and precedents set now may undermine constitutional rights in the long run. Oversight is needed to prevent abuse of powers and protect individuals.
Joseph e. di genova profile
The Profile of US attorney Joseph Di genova who is about to prosecute High rankings members of the Saint Lucia Labour Party for espionage.
Terrorism rsm
Terrorism is defined by Wikipedia and the FBI as violent acts that are intended to intimidate or coerce civilians or governments for political or social goals. The FBI further distinguishes between domestic terrorism, which involves groups operating within the US, and international terrorism, which involves acts that occur outside the US or transcend national borders. A proposal defines terrorism as an illegal act committed by a non-state actor with the intent of causing fear in civilians for political ends.
Censorship and Media (COMM514): Session #2
This document summarizes censorship and media in the United States prior to 1920 through several key events:
- The Zenger trial in 1735 established the defense of truth in libel cases.
- The Sedition Acts of 1798 made it a crime to criticize the government and prosecuted individuals like Rep. Matthew Lyon. Thomas Jefferson opposed the acts on 10th Amendment grounds.
- Anthony Comstock's 1873 laws broadly expanded obscenity restrictions beyond just pornography to literature and art through the postal service.
- During WWI, the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918 criminalized anti-war speech and opposition to military recruitment. Congress repealed the latter in 1920.
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
My presentation at the Tunis Online Freedom Conference, 17 June 2013. Updated for Asia Privacy Scholars Network conference, 9 July 2013, Hong Kong University, and significantly updated for the SCL Policy Forum, 12 Sep 2013, and presentations at Deutsche Bank and Amberhawk (May 2014)
Freedom of speech
The document discusses freedom of speech and its history and application to different forms of media such as television, newspapers, magazines, and the internet. It defines what freedom of speech means, including the right to express information and ideas as well as the right not to speak. It outlines some of the key developments in freedom of speech through history and how the right is applied with some limitations to different media today.
REVISED Bill of Rights Part 1
This document summarizes key sections of the Philippine Bill of Rights. It discusses 15 sections that outline various civil liberties and protections for citizens. Some of the rights covered include freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, right to due process, right against unreasonable searches and seizures, right to travel, right to form unions, and right to just compensation for private property taken for public use. The summary provides an overview of the intent and scope of these constitutional protections for the people of the Philippines.
Bill of rights. MIDTERM
The document discusses several rights protected by the Philippine Constitution. It begins by defining a bill of rights as a declaration of a person's rights and privileges protected against government violations. It notes the social importance given to individual dignity and worth in a democratic state.
It then outlines specific rights such as the right to life, liberty and property protected by due process of law; equal protection under the law; freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; privacy of communication; and freedom of speech, press and religion. It provides explanations and limitations for each right. The document emphasizes that these rights are fundamental to popular sovereignty and people's access to governmental decisions.
Freedom of speech
The document discusses freedom of speech, defining it as the right to express, seek, receive, and impart ideas and information. It traces the history of freedom of speech from the 1500s to modern times, including developments like television, newspapers, and the internet. It also examines some challenges like censorship, hate speech, and the roles and punishment of journalists. The document argues that while freedom of speech is important for democracy and limiting government overreach, there are still debates around current limitations and responsibilities around speech. It suggests globalization, democracy, and civic engagement as ways to help solve issues around freedom of speech.
The First Amendment
The document summarizes the key provisions and origins of the First Amendment to the US Constitution. It protects freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. It originated from government attempts to censor free expression in England and the colonies. Notable cases like John Peter Zenger's trial established truth as a defense against seditious libel. Over time, the First Amendment has been interpreted to protect various forms of expression from government infringement through a system of judicial review and balancing tests.
Policy, Media, and Power.ppt
The President holds power over policy processes, priorities, and persuasion. The document discusses the Patriot Act and how it authorized information sharing between law enforcement and intelligence agencies to help connect dots and disrupt terrorist threats while protecting civil liberties. It also discusses some of the key domestic and foreign policy areas a President would focus on like the economy, healthcare, national security, and relationships with other countries. The media, especially cable news networks and online content, has become very powerful and influential in shaping public opinion and the success of politicians.
Terrorism rsm
The FBI defines terrorism as a violent act committed illegally within the United States to intimidate or coerce the government or public for political or social goals. Domestic terrorism refers to acts committed within the US by individuals or groups without foreign influence, while international terrorism involves acts that violate US law and are intended to intimidate civilians or influence governments abroad.
Bill of rights
The document summarizes the events leading up to the creation of the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution. It explains that the original Articles of Confederation government was not effective, so the Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution in 1787. However, not everyone supported the Constitution because it did not specify individual rights. To help gain approval from the states, a Bill of Rights was promised that would outline specific protections from government overreach. The Bill of Rights was finally ratified in 1791 as the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
Article iii mfa
The document discusses key provisions of the Bill of Rights in the Philippine Constitution. It covers the rights to due process, equal protection, privacy, free speech, religious freedom, travel, information access, and association. It also discusses limitations on these rights and the powers of government, including eminent domain, police power, and taxation.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
More Related Content
What's hot
Final presentation rev 1 - USA Patriot Act
The USA PATRIOT Act was passed 45 days after 9/11 to enhance domestic security and increase surveillance powers. It impacted laws around intelligence gathering, immigration, and more. While proponents argued it granted needed powers to fight terrorism, critics said it infringed on civil liberties. There have been ongoing legal challenges around its scope and application. As time has passed, there are calls to reevaluate the act and ensure powers are not abused.
USA Patriot Act
This document is the text of H.R. 3162, also known as the USA PATRIOT Act, which was passed by Congress in 2001 in response to the September 11th terrorist attacks. The Act aims to deter and punish terrorist acts by enhancing domestic security, surveillance procedures, and law enforcement investigative tools related to terrorism, computer fraud/abuse, and money laundering. It also aims to protect U.S. borders and preserve immigration benefits for victims of terrorism. The Act contains several titles that address these issues across 426 sections.
153777064 transcript-of-wiki leaks-press-conference-on-edward-snowden’s-exit-...
This document summarizes a Wikileaks press conference regarding Edward Snowden's exit from Hong Kong on June 23rd, 2013. The speakers discuss the legal issues surrounding Snowden's application for asylum, including his protections as a whistleblower under international law. They condemn U.S. government attempts to interfere with Snowden's asylum application and calls to extradite him. The speakers argue the more important issue is the massive global surveillance programs revealed by Snowden, and see his and Bradley Manning's cases as part of a pattern of retaliation against whistleblowers by the Obama administration.
Patriot Act
The document discusses safety, liberty, and terrorism. It provides definitions of safety and liberty. It describes how people felt unsafe after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The US government passed the Patriot Act to increase security but also took away some liberties. The Patriot Act expanded the government's surveillance powers. While the Act aimed to increase security, it reduced liberties as warned by Benjamin Franklin's quote about trading liberty for safety.
Executive Order Lecture by Cynthia Farina
Cornell Law Professor Cynthia R. Farina gave an informal talk on executive orders on April 9, 2009. The talk was organized by the Cornell Law School chapter of the National Security and Law Society.
Freedoms Forsaken
The document discusses how in response to terrorist attacks like 9/11, the government has passed legislation like the Patriot Act and FISA that expand surveillance powers but may infringe on civil liberties. It examines several court cases where the State Secrets privilege was used to dismiss lawsuits around warrantless wiretapping programs. While greater security is important, especially during times of crisis, balancing it with civil liberties is challenging and precedents set now may undermine constitutional rights in the long run. Oversight is needed to prevent abuse of powers and protect individuals.
Joseph e. di genova profile
The Profile of US attorney Joseph Di genova who is about to prosecute High rankings members of the Saint Lucia Labour Party for espionage.
Terrorism rsm
Terrorism is defined by Wikipedia and the FBI as violent acts that are intended to intimidate or coerce civilians or governments for political or social goals. The FBI further distinguishes between domestic terrorism, which involves groups operating within the US, and international terrorism, which involves acts that occur outside the US or transcend national borders. A proposal defines terrorism as an illegal act committed by a non-state actor with the intent of causing fear in civilians for political ends.
Censorship and Media (COMM514): Session #2
This document summarizes censorship and media in the United States prior to 1920 through several key events:
- The Zenger trial in 1735 established the defense of truth in libel cases.
- The Sedition Acts of 1798 made it a crime to criticize the government and prosecuted individuals like Rep. Matthew Lyon. Thomas Jefferson opposed the acts on 10th Amendment grounds.
- Anthony Comstock's 1873 laws broadly expanded obscenity restrictions beyond just pornography to literature and art through the postal service.
- During WWI, the Espionage Act of 1917 and Sedition Act of 1918 criminalized anti-war speech and opposition to military recruitment. Congress repealed the latter in 1920.
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
My presentation at the Tunis Online Freedom Conference, 17 June 2013. Updated for Asia Privacy Scholars Network conference, 9 July 2013, Hong Kong University, and significantly updated for the SCL Policy Forum, 12 Sep 2013, and presentations at Deutsche Bank and Amberhawk (May 2014)
Freedom of speech
The document discusses freedom of speech and its history and application to different forms of media such as television, newspapers, magazines, and the internet. It defines what freedom of speech means, including the right to express information and ideas as well as the right not to speak. It outlines some of the key developments in freedom of speech through history and how the right is applied with some limitations to different media today.
REVISED Bill of Rights Part 1
This document summarizes key sections of the Philippine Bill of Rights. It discusses 15 sections that outline various civil liberties and protections for citizens. Some of the rights covered include freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, right to due process, right against unreasonable searches and seizures, right to travel, right to form unions, and right to just compensation for private property taken for public use. The summary provides an overview of the intent and scope of these constitutional protections for the people of the Philippines.
Bill of rights. MIDTERM
The document discusses several rights protected by the Philippine Constitution. It begins by defining a bill of rights as a declaration of a person's rights and privileges protected against government violations. It notes the social importance given to individual dignity and worth in a democratic state.
It then outlines specific rights such as the right to life, liberty and property protected by due process of law; equal protection under the law; freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures; privacy of communication; and freedom of speech, press and religion. It provides explanations and limitations for each right. The document emphasizes that these rights are fundamental to popular sovereignty and people's access to governmental decisions.
Freedom of speech
The document discusses freedom of speech, defining it as the right to express, seek, receive, and impart ideas and information. It traces the history of freedom of speech from the 1500s to modern times, including developments like television, newspapers, and the internet. It also examines some challenges like censorship, hate speech, and the roles and punishment of journalists. The document argues that while freedom of speech is important for democracy and limiting government overreach, there are still debates around current limitations and responsibilities around speech. It suggests globalization, democracy, and civic engagement as ways to help solve issues around freedom of speech.
The First Amendment
The document summarizes the key provisions and origins of the First Amendment to the US Constitution. It protects freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and the right to petition the government. It originated from government attempts to censor free expression in England and the colonies. Notable cases like John Peter Zenger's trial established truth as a defense against seditious libel. Over time, the First Amendment has been interpreted to protect various forms of expression from government infringement through a system of judicial review and balancing tests.
Policy, Media, and Power.ppt
The President holds power over policy processes, priorities, and persuasion. The document discusses the Patriot Act and how it authorized information sharing between law enforcement and intelligence agencies to help connect dots and disrupt terrorist threats while protecting civil liberties. It also discusses some of the key domestic and foreign policy areas a President would focus on like the economy, healthcare, national security, and relationships with other countries. The media, especially cable news networks and online content, has become very powerful and influential in shaping public opinion and the success of politicians.
Terrorism rsm
The FBI defines terrorism as a violent act committed illegally within the United States to intimidate or coerce the government or public for political or social goals. Domestic terrorism refers to acts committed within the US by individuals or groups without foreign influence, while international terrorism involves acts that violate US law and are intended to intimidate civilians or influence governments abroad.
Bill of rights
The document summarizes the events leading up to the creation of the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution. It explains that the original Articles of Confederation government was not effective, so the Founding Fathers drafted the Constitution in 1787. However, not everyone supported the Constitution because it did not specify individual rights. To help gain approval from the states, a Bill of Rights was promised that would outline specific protections from government overreach. The Bill of Rights was finally ratified in 1791 as the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.
Article iii mfa
The document discusses key provisions of the Bill of Rights in the Philippine Constitution. It covers the rights to due process, equal protection, privacy, free speech, religious freedom, travel, information access, and association. It also discusses limitations on these rights and the powers of government, including eminent domain, police power, and taxation.
What's hot (20)
153777064 transcript-of-wiki leaks-press-conference-on-edward-snowden’s-exit-...
153777064 transcript-of-wiki leaks-press-conference-on-edward-snowden’s-exit-...
Recently uploaded
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
Gabriel Whitley's Motion Summary Judgment
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
EED - The Container Port PERFORMANCE INDEX 2023
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series)..pdf
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Letter-from-ECI-to-MeiTY-21st-march-2024.pdf
भारत सरकार द्वारा बड़े पैमाने पर व्हाट्सएप अभियान चलाए जाने से डेटा गोपनीयता, नैतिकता और चुनावों की निष्पक्षता पर सवाल उठते हैं।
What Ukraine Has Lost During Russia’s Invasion
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Recently uploaded (9)
Can you have liberty while maintaining security
- 1. Team: Mateo, Pancho, Andrea Matuk, Yazet
- 2. 1. Freedom from risk or danger; safety. 2. Freedom from doubt, anxiety, or fear; confidence. 3. Something that gives or assures safety Security http://www.thefreedictionary.com/security
- 3. The condition of being free from restriction or control. b. The right and power to act, believe, or express oneself in a manner of one's own choosing. c. The condition of being physically and legally free from confinement, servitude, or forced labor. 2. Freedom from unjust or undue governmental control. Liberty http://www.thefreedictionary.com/liberty
- 4. 1.- Name a place where you feel safe. What makes you feel safe there? Our houses because of the constant patrol and vigilance. 2.- What happened on 09/11/01 that changed what people felt? The terrorist attack that destroyed the twin towers. 3.- How did people feel when the 9/11/01 attacks were happening and shortly after? They were scared, unsecure, sad, and they wanted to blame someone. 4.- How did the government react to the 9/11/01 attack ? They wanted to blame someone, they created the Patriot Act 5.- Who are we fighting in a war on terrorism? What country? Afghanistan 6.- The US attacked the country of Afghanistan does anyone know why? They gave Afghanistan a timeline to hand over Osama Bin Laden or they would declare war 7.- The US also attacked Iraq does anyone know why? They were accused of developing nuclear weapons 8.- What do terrorist look like? They don’t have an specific look they could be anyone 9.- What was the last terrorist attack on the US? Boston mosque
- 5. "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001." Patriot Act
- 6. The USA PATRIOT Act is used to detect and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, it wants to improve law enforcement investigatory tools, and other purposes. It gives new powers to the Justice Department in terms of domestic and international surveillance of American citizens and others within its jurisdiction. The act gives the government too much power, threatens civil liberties and undermines the very democracy it seeks to protect. Patriot Act http://www.fincen.gov/statutes_regs/patriot/
- 7. The 9/11 attack brought terror and chaos to many people, they started to feel unsecure. Since the attack of 9/11 the USA government has been trying to prevent any other possible terrorist attacks using the patriot act, this act has helped prevent many attacks but it also violates many aspects of liberty. So it is difficult to have liberty while maintaining security. Conclusion