We can now join the components of our analysis of being in the world into a coherent whole. Our characterizations of default human beingness as thrown projection, care, being towards death and being guilty are complementary views of the same ontological structure from different angles. But one of our goals remains unfulfilled: we still require existential proof that a person stuck in inauthentic being is capable of attaining integrity. If our analysis is accurate, the Voice of Conscience articulates the Call. The Call is a hint within our everyday existential inauthenticity that we are anxious about our potential for authentic existence. It is the voice of our repressed but still existing capacity for genuine selfhood. But if that capacity is genuinely repressed, how can it speak out? If we can hear the Call, its repression must already have been lifted. We must have already discovered our possibility of authentic being, no matter how minutely.
Sue Frederick Soul Mate Workshop Proposal 2012Sue Frederick
Sue Frederick, Author of I See Your Soul Mate (St. Martin's Press), teaches you to remember who YOU are, what you signed up for and how to find the partner you made a true love agreement with before this life began.
Our ontological analysis in the Being in the World series shows that authentic Being is ontologically possible within our default mode of being in the world. But merely to theorize the possibility of such a state of complete integrity and mature individuality is insufficient.
Call of the Friend shows how to actualize the possibility of being integrity in our everyday life, despite the fact that in being in the world, our individuality is always already lost in the Other. Here we identify the ontological roots of the ontic possibility of integrity as wholeness. We also identify existential evidence for practically realizing our possibility for authenticity.
Graspable = ready-to-hand.
Ungraspable = present-to-hand.
Death is graspable only as a possibility.
It can help us choose our authentic possibilities.
By relating to it through the other possibilities that are similarly our own.
Death is also graspable as a condition.
Self-concealing because it is non-existential.
It increases the significance of every choice we make.
Death as a context adds meaning, distinguishes authentic being.
Death can be ontologically characterized as the own-most, non-relational and inevitable possibility. It is an omnipresent, inescapable but non-actualizable possibility of our Being. Thus it is an ungraspable but undeniable aspect of every moment of our existence. It follows that we can only relate to death in and through its relation to what is graspable in our existence—namely, the genuine existential possibilities that constitute our daily life. Death thus remains beyond any direct existential or phenomenological grasp. But it is graspable indirectly, as an omnipresent condition of every moment of our directly graspable existence. Death is not a specific feature of the existential landscape, but a light or shadow emanating evenly and implacably from every such feature. It is the context within which the existential features configure themselves, a self-concealing condition for our capacity to authentically disclose our own existence to ourselves.
Sue Frederick Soul Mate Workshop Proposal 2012Sue Frederick
Sue Frederick, Author of I See Your Soul Mate (St. Martin's Press), teaches you to remember who YOU are, what you signed up for and how to find the partner you made a true love agreement with before this life began.
Our ontological analysis in the Being in the World series shows that authentic Being is ontologically possible within our default mode of being in the world. But merely to theorize the possibility of such a state of complete integrity and mature individuality is insufficient.
Call of the Friend shows how to actualize the possibility of being integrity in our everyday life, despite the fact that in being in the world, our individuality is always already lost in the Other. Here we identify the ontological roots of the ontic possibility of integrity as wholeness. We also identify existential evidence for practically realizing our possibility for authenticity.
Graspable = ready-to-hand.
Ungraspable = present-to-hand.
Death is graspable only as a possibility.
It can help us choose our authentic possibilities.
By relating to it through the other possibilities that are similarly our own.
Death is also graspable as a condition.
Self-concealing because it is non-existential.
It increases the significance of every choice we make.
Death as a context adds meaning, distinguishes authentic being.
Death can be ontologically characterized as the own-most, non-relational and inevitable possibility. It is an omnipresent, inescapable but non-actualizable possibility of our Being. Thus it is an ungraspable but undeniable aspect of every moment of our existence. It follows that we can only relate to death in and through its relation to what is graspable in our existence—namely, the genuine existential possibilities that constitute our daily life. Death thus remains beyond any direct existential or phenomenological grasp. But it is graspable indirectly, as an omnipresent condition of every moment of our directly graspable existence. Death is not a specific feature of the existential landscape, but a light or shadow emanating evenly and implacably from every such feature. It is the context within which the existential features configure themselves, a self-concealing condition for our capacity to authentically disclose our own existence to ourselves.
Our ontological analysis of our default being in the world has been static—without considering its relation to time. Continuing our analysis of the underlying ontological structure of Being, we will connect the concepts of care and temporality. As before, we will forge that connection through a methodical process of phenomenological self-reflection. Our analysis of being in the world so far has been restricted to the negative. First, we focused upon inauthentic modes of being by concentrating on our average everydayness. Second, we downplayed the general structure of life as a unified whole by concentrating on the ontological structure of specific moods such as anxiety. We now reconsider these topics to demonstrate the fundamental relation of Being in time. The triple ontological structure of this section and those immediately following is authenticity, totality and temporality.
Finding the Door: Falling away from our authentic self is thus experienced as a general phenomenon in life, to which every facet of human culture is vulnerable. Its convenience, generality, and particularly its effects in the philosophical traditions, are structural. For if this falling is a consequence of our absorption in the Other, it must be just as much a part of our ontological structure as the fact that we generally fail to find ourselves. Thus the tendency towards falling is an existential characteristic of default human beingness.
Our ontological analysis of anxiety in the previous section also sheds much light on skepticism and nihilism. Philosophers again and again attempt disproofs of skepticism about the reality of the external world; nevertheless all such attempts to invalidate the skeptical attitude ultimately fail. This is because any proper conception of our worldliness makes the skeptic’s doubts self-defeating, impossible and devoid of significance. We cannot disprove an unprovable philosophy. Nevertheless, skepticism as a mode of being persists.
An explanation of the spiritual concepts of impermanence, nonattachment, and mindfulness by Rev. Ed Geraty of the Universalus Interspiritual Community.
Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde Notice This m.docxdebishakespeare
Essays and Speeches
by
Audre Lorde
Notice
This materia! may be
protected by copyright
law (Hie 17 U.S Code)
San Francisco State University
~ The Crossing Press / Freedom, CA 95019
~ The Crossing Press Feminist Series
GByun
Copyright
Uses of the Erotic:
The Erotic as Power*
THERE ARE MANY kinds of power, used and unused, acknowl-
edged or otherwise. The erotic is a resource within each of us
that lies in a deeply female and spiritual plane, firmly rooted in
the power of our unexpressed or unrecognized feeling. In order
to perpetuate itself, every oppression must corrupt or distort
those various sources of power within the culture of the op-
pressed that can provide energy for change. For women, this has
meant a suppression of the erotic as a considered source of
power and information within our lives.
We have been taught to suspect this resource, vilified, abused,
and devalued within western society. On the one hand, the
superficially erotic has been encouraged as a sign of female in-
feriority; on the other hand, women have been made to suffer
and to feel both contemptible and suspect by virtue of its ex-
istence.
It is a short step from there to the false belief that only by the
suppression of the erotic within our lives and consciousness can
women be truly strong. But that strength is illusory, for it is
fashioned within the context of male models of power.
As women, we have come to distrust that power which rises
from our deepest and nontational knowledge. We have been
warned against it all our lives by the male world, which values
• Paper delivered at the Fourth Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Mount
Holyoke College. August 25, 1978. Published as a pamphlet by Out & Out Books
(available from The Crossing Press).
53
54 SISTER OUTSIDER
this depth of feeling enough to keep women around in order to
exercise it in the service of men, but which fears this same depth
too much to examine the possibilities of it within themselves. So
women are maintained at a distantlinferior position to be
psychically milked, much the same way ants maintain colonies
of aphids to provide a life-giving substance for their masters.
But the erotic offers a well of replenishing and provocative
force to the woman who does not fear its revelation, nor suc-
cumb to the belief that sensation is enough.
The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against
women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the
psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have
often turned away from the exploration and consideration of
the erotic as a source of power and information, confusing it
with its opposite, the pornographic. But pornography is a direct
denial of the power of the erotic, for it represents the suppres-
sion of true feeling. Pornography emphasizes sensation without
feeling.
The erotic is a measure between the beginnings of our sense of
self and the chaos of ou.
Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde Notice This m.docxelbanglis
Essays and Speeches
by
Audre Lorde
Notice
This materia! may be
protected by copyright
law (Hie 17 U.S Code)
San Francisco State University
~ The Crossing Press / Freedom, CA 95019
~ The Crossing Press Feminist Series
GByun
Copyright
Uses of the Erotic:
The Erotic as Power*
THERE ARE MANY kinds of power, used and unused, acknowl-
edged or otherwise. The erotic is a resource within each of us
that lies in a deeply female and spiritual plane, firmly rooted in
the power of our unexpressed or unrecognized feeling. In order
to perpetuate itself, every oppression must corrupt or distort
those various sources of power within the culture of the op-
pressed that can provide energy for change. For women, this has
meant a suppression of the erotic as a considered source of
power and information within our lives.
We have been taught to suspect this resource, vilified, abused,
and devalued within western society. On the one hand, the
superficially erotic has been encouraged as a sign of female in-
feriority; on the other hand, women have been made to suffer
and to feel both contemptible and suspect by virtue of its ex-
istence.
It is a short step from there to the false belief that only by the
suppression of the erotic within our lives and consciousness can
women be truly strong. But that strength is illusory, for it is
fashioned within the context of male models of power.
As women, we have come to distrust that power which rises
from our deepest and nontational knowledge. We have been
warned against it all our lives by the male world, which values
• Paper delivered at the Fourth Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Mount
Holyoke College. August 25, 1978. Published as a pamphlet by Out & Out Books
(available from The Crossing Press).
53
54 SISTER OUTSIDER
this depth of feeling enough to keep women around in order to
exercise it in the service of men, but which fears this same depth
too much to examine the possibilities of it within themselves. So
women are maintained at a distantlinferior position to be
psychically milked, much the same way ants maintain colonies
of aphids to provide a life-giving substance for their masters.
But the erotic offers a well of replenishing and provocative
force to the woman who does not fear its revelation, nor suc-
cumb to the belief that sensation is enough.
The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against
women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the
psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have
often turned away from the exploration and consideration of
the erotic as a source of power and information, confusing it
with its opposite, the pornographic. But pornography is a direct
denial of the power of the erotic, for it represents the suppres-
sion of true feeling. Pornography emphasizes sensation without
feeling.
The erotic is a measure between the beginnings of our sense of
self and the chaos of ou ...
Our analysis of death is part of our search for a complete ontological description of being in the world. Mortality often seems to be an insuperable obstacle to grasping the ontological structure of human existence as a single, unified whole. But our analysis demonstrates that understanding our mortality is actually a precondition for any individual to attain existential integrity. Our existence can become genuinely individual and whole only by seeing death ontologically as an ever-present impossible possibility that makes the possible impossibility of our existence inevitable.
Becoming is the process of changing your Being.
The dictionary defines Becoming as follows:
Be•come v. Begin to be; grow to be; turn into; (of a person) qualify or be accepted as; acquire the status of: ‘she wanted to become a doctor’.
For applications like Ontological Education, Integrity and Leadership, we are especially interested in this part of the process.
We can call this The Process of Becoming.
The Buddha defines Becoming as follows:
“Kamma is the field, consciousness the seed, craving the moisture. The consciousness of living beings… is tuned to a lower property… to a middling property… to a refined property. Thus there is the production of renewed becoming in the future. This is how there is becoming.” — Bhava Sutta (AN 3.76)
Becoming is the process of changing your Being.
The dictionary defines Becoming as follows:
Be•come v. Begin to be; grow to be; turn into; (of a person) qualify or be accepted as; acquire the status of: ‘she wanted to become a doctor’.
The Buddha defines Becoming as follows:
“Kamma is the field, consciousness the seed, craving the moisture. The consciousness of living beings… is tuned to a lower quality… to a middling property… to a refined property. Thus there is the production of renewed becoming in the future. This is how there is becoming.” — Bhava Sutta (AN 3.76)
Our ontological analysis of our default being in the world has been static—without considering its relation to time. Continuing our analysis of the underlying ontological structure of Being, we will connect the concepts of care and temporality. As before, we will forge that connection through a methodical process of phenomenological self-reflection. Our analysis of being in the world so far has been restricted to the negative. First, we focused upon inauthentic modes of being by concentrating on our average everydayness. Second, we downplayed the general structure of life as a unified whole by concentrating on the ontological structure of specific moods such as anxiety. We now reconsider these topics to demonstrate the fundamental relation of Being in time. The triple ontological structure of this section and those immediately following is authenticity, totality and temporality.
Finding the Door: Falling away from our authentic self is thus experienced as a general phenomenon in life, to which every facet of human culture is vulnerable. Its convenience, generality, and particularly its effects in the philosophical traditions, are structural. For if this falling is a consequence of our absorption in the Other, it must be just as much a part of our ontological structure as the fact that we generally fail to find ourselves. Thus the tendency towards falling is an existential characteristic of default human beingness.
Our ontological analysis of anxiety in the previous section also sheds much light on skepticism and nihilism. Philosophers again and again attempt disproofs of skepticism about the reality of the external world; nevertheless all such attempts to invalidate the skeptical attitude ultimately fail. This is because any proper conception of our worldliness makes the skeptic’s doubts self-defeating, impossible and devoid of significance. We cannot disprove an unprovable philosophy. Nevertheless, skepticism as a mode of being persists.
An explanation of the spiritual concepts of impermanence, nonattachment, and mindfulness by Rev. Ed Geraty of the Universalus Interspiritual Community.
Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde Notice This m.docxdebishakespeare
Essays and Speeches
by
Audre Lorde
Notice
This materia! may be
protected by copyright
law (Hie 17 U.S Code)
San Francisco State University
~ The Crossing Press / Freedom, CA 95019
~ The Crossing Press Feminist Series
GByun
Copyright
Uses of the Erotic:
The Erotic as Power*
THERE ARE MANY kinds of power, used and unused, acknowl-
edged or otherwise. The erotic is a resource within each of us
that lies in a deeply female and spiritual plane, firmly rooted in
the power of our unexpressed or unrecognized feeling. In order
to perpetuate itself, every oppression must corrupt or distort
those various sources of power within the culture of the op-
pressed that can provide energy for change. For women, this has
meant a suppression of the erotic as a considered source of
power and information within our lives.
We have been taught to suspect this resource, vilified, abused,
and devalued within western society. On the one hand, the
superficially erotic has been encouraged as a sign of female in-
feriority; on the other hand, women have been made to suffer
and to feel both contemptible and suspect by virtue of its ex-
istence.
It is a short step from there to the false belief that only by the
suppression of the erotic within our lives and consciousness can
women be truly strong. But that strength is illusory, for it is
fashioned within the context of male models of power.
As women, we have come to distrust that power which rises
from our deepest and nontational knowledge. We have been
warned against it all our lives by the male world, which values
• Paper delivered at the Fourth Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Mount
Holyoke College. August 25, 1978. Published as a pamphlet by Out & Out Books
(available from The Crossing Press).
53
54 SISTER OUTSIDER
this depth of feeling enough to keep women around in order to
exercise it in the service of men, but which fears this same depth
too much to examine the possibilities of it within themselves. So
women are maintained at a distantlinferior position to be
psychically milked, much the same way ants maintain colonies
of aphids to provide a life-giving substance for their masters.
But the erotic offers a well of replenishing and provocative
force to the woman who does not fear its revelation, nor suc-
cumb to the belief that sensation is enough.
The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against
women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the
psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have
often turned away from the exploration and consideration of
the erotic as a source of power and information, confusing it
with its opposite, the pornographic. But pornography is a direct
denial of the power of the erotic, for it represents the suppres-
sion of true feeling. Pornography emphasizes sensation without
feeling.
The erotic is a measure between the beginnings of our sense of
self and the chaos of ou.
Essays and Speeches by Audre Lorde Notice This m.docxelbanglis
Essays and Speeches
by
Audre Lorde
Notice
This materia! may be
protected by copyright
law (Hie 17 U.S Code)
San Francisco State University
~ The Crossing Press / Freedom, CA 95019
~ The Crossing Press Feminist Series
GByun
Copyright
Uses of the Erotic:
The Erotic as Power*
THERE ARE MANY kinds of power, used and unused, acknowl-
edged or otherwise. The erotic is a resource within each of us
that lies in a deeply female and spiritual plane, firmly rooted in
the power of our unexpressed or unrecognized feeling. In order
to perpetuate itself, every oppression must corrupt or distort
those various sources of power within the culture of the op-
pressed that can provide energy for change. For women, this has
meant a suppression of the erotic as a considered source of
power and information within our lives.
We have been taught to suspect this resource, vilified, abused,
and devalued within western society. On the one hand, the
superficially erotic has been encouraged as a sign of female in-
feriority; on the other hand, women have been made to suffer
and to feel both contemptible and suspect by virtue of its ex-
istence.
It is a short step from there to the false belief that only by the
suppression of the erotic within our lives and consciousness can
women be truly strong. But that strength is illusory, for it is
fashioned within the context of male models of power.
As women, we have come to distrust that power which rises
from our deepest and nontational knowledge. We have been
warned against it all our lives by the male world, which values
• Paper delivered at the Fourth Berkshire Conference on the History of Women, Mount
Holyoke College. August 25, 1978. Published as a pamphlet by Out & Out Books
(available from The Crossing Press).
53
54 SISTER OUTSIDER
this depth of feeling enough to keep women around in order to
exercise it in the service of men, but which fears this same depth
too much to examine the possibilities of it within themselves. So
women are maintained at a distantlinferior position to be
psychically milked, much the same way ants maintain colonies
of aphids to provide a life-giving substance for their masters.
But the erotic offers a well of replenishing and provocative
force to the woman who does not fear its revelation, nor suc-
cumb to the belief that sensation is enough.
The erotic has often been misnamed by men and used against
women. It has been made into the confused, the trivial, the
psychotic, the plasticized sensation. For this reason, we have
often turned away from the exploration and consideration of
the erotic as a source of power and information, confusing it
with its opposite, the pornographic. But pornography is a direct
denial of the power of the erotic, for it represents the suppres-
sion of true feeling. Pornography emphasizes sensation without
feeling.
The erotic is a measure between the beginnings of our sense of
self and the chaos of ou ...
Our analysis of death is part of our search for a complete ontological description of being in the world. Mortality often seems to be an insuperable obstacle to grasping the ontological structure of human existence as a single, unified whole. But our analysis demonstrates that understanding our mortality is actually a precondition for any individual to attain existential integrity. Our existence can become genuinely individual and whole only by seeing death ontologically as an ever-present impossible possibility that makes the possible impossibility of our existence inevitable.
Becoming is the process of changing your Being.
The dictionary defines Becoming as follows:
Be•come v. Begin to be; grow to be; turn into; (of a person) qualify or be accepted as; acquire the status of: ‘she wanted to become a doctor’.
For applications like Ontological Education, Integrity and Leadership, we are especially interested in this part of the process.
We can call this The Process of Becoming.
The Buddha defines Becoming as follows:
“Kamma is the field, consciousness the seed, craving the moisture. The consciousness of living beings… is tuned to a lower property… to a middling property… to a refined property. Thus there is the production of renewed becoming in the future. This is how there is becoming.” — Bhava Sutta (AN 3.76)
Becoming is the process of changing your Being.
The dictionary defines Becoming as follows:
Be•come v. Begin to be; grow to be; turn into; (of a person) qualify or be accepted as; acquire the status of: ‘she wanted to become a doctor’.
The Buddha defines Becoming as follows:
“Kamma is the field, consciousness the seed, craving the moisture. The consciousness of living beings… is tuned to a lower quality… to a middling property… to a refined property. Thus there is the production of renewed becoming in the future. This is how there is becoming.” — Bhava Sutta (AN 3.76)
“And how is a person of integrity endowed with qualities of integrity? There is the case where a person of integrity is endowed with conviction, conscience, concern; he is learned, with aroused persistence, unmuddled mindfulness and good discernment. This is how a person of integrity is endowed with qualities of integrity.”
— Cūḷa-puṇṇama Sutta (MN 110)
We use a positive model of integrity. It provides powerful access to enhanced performance for individuals, groups, organizations, and societies.
In our model, we discern (recognize) four phenomena dealing with right and wrong:
• morality
• ethics
• legality
• integrity
What is the teaching of the Buddha?
Is it a religion, or is it really something else—something we don’t even have a word for?
Why does Buddhism have so many rules?
Is there a scientific basis for integrity, ethics, morality, right and wrong?
What are the benefits of precepts like truthfulness, mindfulness and renunciation?
Aren’t they just outmoded beliefs?
Unity or oneness is the goal.
Mindfulness misdefined as open, receptive, pre-verbal awareness.
The Buddha does not speak with final authority because of cultural differences.
Idealism or perfection is unrealistic, against human nature.
Suttas should not be read as literal descriptions but as poetic mythology.
The Suttas encourage meditative activism.
Unity or oneness is the goal.
Integrity is difficult because it is misunderstood.
We are conditioned to be out of integrity.
Without integrity we are less than fully human.
Difference between ordinary schooling and ontological education.
Be ready to examine your assumptions about life.
Show up fully present, participating with integrity and being yourself authentically.
Look up and clear your misunderstood terms, as discussed in Becoming Genius.
Be committed to something greater than yourself, as described in What is Skillful Living?
Be willing to be cause over changing your Being, as discussed in Being and Becoming.
Being Integrity uses a certain technical terminology. You may think—and even find that others agree—that our language is unnecessarily complex, and could be made much simpler and more understandable.
Do not make this mistake, because if you do you will block the full benefit that this series makes available to you. The semantics of this material is very carefully crafted to provide a specific result. Substituting other terminology will deprive it of much of its power and effectiveness.
Most people have become so alienated from themselves by being in the world that they do not hear the silent summons of the Court of Conscience within their hearts. Thus they are convicted by default, and live the rest of their lives in dread of death.
Karma does not require any external agency, an omniscient divine judge or mystical accounting system. We ourselves are the plaintiff, the judge and the bailiff. Knowing well what we have done and not done, we condemn and sentence ourselves to a just punishment. The vast majority of human beings go after death to lower embodiments: animal wombs or other hellish conditions. These are already conditioned by their activities in this life. The process of Dependent Origination reliably brings that name-&-form into manifestation in the next life. This can happen over an entire lifespan, or in a moment. This dukkha: suffering or displeasure. The Buddha taught dukkha as the First Noble Truth, because realizing how deeply we are caught in the web of suffering is precisely the motivation to getting out.
The Call of the Friend can happen to everyone. It is a potential that can occur at any moment, due to the inherent tension of Being in the World. The Call of the Friend leads us out of this tension towards a resolution based on achieving our authentic individuality. The Call of the Friend can be heard from within ourselves. It also can be echoed by someone outside of us—someone who is further along in the process of regaining their authentic Being. This is a special kind of friendship, not based on attachment or seeking reward, but on regaining and maintaining one’s individual integrity (wholeness).
We have presented a rationale for choice and values that retains the authenticity and integrity of an individual’s life. The advantage of this model is that it gives unity to a life as a whole without requiring submission to a more or less arbitrary external authority. To achieve this wholeness, we still require to relate our life to something transcendent, beyond or outside itself. But in this case it is related to something that is one’s very own—that is, to death.
The ontological model presented herein is firmly rooted in philosophical rigor yet fully compatible with postmodern sensibilities. However, it would be premature to conclude that we advocate nihilism or atheism. The purpose of the spiritual agnosticism of Being in the World is to create an experiential ontological platform free from theological complexities. Our phenomenological approach provides a new model for theism grounded in direct personal experience of the Supreme instead of authority. Succeeding Parts of Friend of the Heart will develop this model in detail.
We have been leading up to this topic.
Care for ‘the world’ is an inadequate basis for choice.
Awareness of impending death provides a basis for integrity.
It shows that choosing for ‘the world’ is completely inauthentic.
It robs us of our self-determinism, energy, attention and authenticity.
Integrity is required for authentic Being.
Integrity is the subject of one of our advanced courses.
We use a positive model of integrity, versus the typical normative virtue model.
We define integrity as “the state or condition of being whole, complete, unbroken, unimpaired, sound, in perfect condition.”
Time is the ultimate ontological constraint.
Time provides the ultimate object of care: death.
Phenomenological process discloses the relation of care with death.
Inauthenticity comes first.
Temporality means being in time.
Authenticity includes being authentic about our inauthenticity.
Totality includes all sides of our being: inauthentic and authentic.
Skepticism—Look it up!
Nihilism—Look it up!
Doubting the world is a non-issue.
Skepticism toward claims is a good idea.
The only reality for us is our experience.
The world is the context for ordinary being.
Skepticism toward the world is unprovable.
You can doubt anything!
Skepticism is logically self-defeating.
The skeptical attitude finds sufficient evidence to nourish it.
Everyone is fallen.
Inauthenticity is convenient.
Traditional philosophy is inauthentic.
The cause is the structure of being in the world.
Impersonalism = objectification.
Thrown = bias toward inauthenticity.
Absorption = looking for ourselves in other entities and phenomena.
Ontology—Look it up!
Omitted from school — JT Gatto.
Trained to be a slave for 12+ years.
Experience—not external authority.
Being—not knowing, thinking, doing or having.
Care = our default way of being in the world.
We sacrifice authentic Being, trapped in the world of the Other.
Success comes from Being—not knowing, thinking, doing or having.
Ontology, the science of beingness, reveals deep insights about the nature of human life and experience. An ontological analysis of the human condition—our way of being—shows that our everyday social relations give us a particular kind of preoccupation with the world. This care about the world involves us in a network of conditions and actions we do not choose, leading us away from our authentic self.
This video series presents an extended ontological analysis of a subject that concerns and involves us all: Being in the World. Each section of the analysis will be accompanied by a detailed Study Guide giving directions for further observation and study.
We will analyze the ontic qualities of being in the world according to the ontological criteria and phenomenological methods given in the previous series, Becoming Genius. Needless to say, a working knowledge and practical familiarity with the methods presented in our previous series will be necessary to follow the discussion in Being in the World.
me•ta•cog•ni•tion, n. Awareness and understanding of one’s own thought processes.
Metacognition is cognition about cognition, or knowing about knowing. It can take many forms; it includes knowledge about when and how to use particular strategies for learning or problem-solving.
There are generally two components of metacognition: knowledge about cognition, and regulation of cognition.
The Ontological Triple is the atomic unit of ontological structure—a triune entity usually consisting of subject, object and their relation. Generally the parts of a Triple correspond with the subject, object and predicate in the grammar of most ordinary languages.
Any relationship can be expressed in the form of a Triple. Any number of Triples can overlap in being-space to express complex structures and relations.
Four Stages of Becoming Genius For any given subject: Duplication: Making an exact copy of the source
Understanding: Systems thinking through logic
Analysis: Contemplation of abstract relationships
Metacognition: Realization of new state of being
For applications like Learning and Leadership, we are especially interested in this part of Dependent Origination. We can call this The Process of Becoming.
For the purpose of investigating Learning as a process of Becoming, we will divide the stages a little differently.
We invest so much effort in proper use and understanding of language and terminology because the feedback loop between Consciousness and Name-and-Form is the most sensitive point in the Process of Becoming.
This video is about how to learn skillfully: the science of study.
If you duplicate and apply these methods in your study of Skillful Living, you will get much more out of the materials.
Most schooling deliberately teaches you the wrong way to learn. First, you should not approach a subject because someone else is making you study it. You should approach it because you want to learn it and put it into practical use in your life. In other words, you should learn to acquire skills.
The first necessary skill in the art of Skillful Living is how to learn skillfully.
Welcome to the Program Your Destiny course. In this course, we will be learning the technology of personal transformation, neuroassociative conditioning (NAC) as pioneered by Tony Robbins. NAC is used to deprogram negative neuroassociations that are causing approach avoidance and instead reprogram yourself with positive neuroassociations that lead to being approach automatic. In doing so, you change your destiny, moving towards unlocking the hypersocial self within, the true self free from fear and operating from a place of personal power and love.
2. We can now join the components of our analysis of being
in the world into a coherent whole. Our characterizations
of default human beingness as thrown projection, care,
being towards death and being guilty are complementary
views of the same ontological structure from different
angles. But one of our goals remains unfulfilled: we still
require existential proof that a person stuck in
inauthentic being is capable of attaining
integrity.
Attaining Authenticity
3. If our analysis is accurate, theVoice of Conscience articulates
the Call.The Call is a hint within our everyday existential
inauthenticity that we are anxious about our potential for
authentic existence. It is the voice of our repressed but still
existing capacity for genuine selfhood. But if that capacity is
genuinely repressed, how can it speak out? If we can hear the
Call, its repression must already have been lifted.We must have
already discovered our possibility of authentic being, no matter
how minutely.
Attaining Authenticity
4. The central difficulty is that we conceive of our default being as
inherently split. Human beings are capable of living authentically
or inauthentically. Either we are lost in the distractions of the
Other while retaining the capacity for wrenching ourselves away
from it, or we have realized the existential possibilities
expressing our real individuality, while still remaining vulnerable
to falling back into the world.We retain this dual nature as long
as we are in the world—that is, as long as we are alive.
Attaining Authenticity
5. The transition from inauthentic to authentic being therefore
involves an internal shift in emphasis.The urge for genuine
individuality must come to eclipse the habits of inauthentic
being.Without some help, this transition can only be brought
about by our own resources. But overcoming our self-
imposed darkness by ourselves seems impossible. Indeed,
our experience does not confirm this possibility.
Attaining Authenticity
6. The Call must come from outside ourselves—from someone
who is with us in the world, but is not lost in the world.The
Call of conscience must be articulated externally by someone
else; someone who diagnoses us as lost, and has an interest
in our overcoming inauthenticity and freeing our capacity to live
a genuinely individual life.This external intervention disrupts
our self-reinforcing dispersal in the Other, recalling us to
our own authentic possibilities.
Attaining Authenticity
7. The Call of Conscience, though it may actually come from within, is
perceived to be external.The Caller’s aim is to help us recover our
capacity for selfhood, our autonomy. He does not wish to impose
upon us a specific blueprint for living, or replace our present
servitude to the Other with servitude to himself. His only aim is to
remind us of our capacity for individuality, to urge us to listen to
the demands of our authenticity. In so doing, he functions as an
external representative of an aspect of ourselves, his Call being
proxy for our potential for authenticity.This Call is now repressed,
but it nonetheless constitutes our most true self; in that sense, the
Caller speaks from within us, echoing the voice of our conscience.
Attaining Authenticity
8. The voice of another person, whose reticent tone
acknowledges our own inner voice, would be perceived
by us as possessing exactly the phenomenological
characteristics defining the Call of Conscience.We
perceive that the Call comes from within us, and yet
from beyond us. It seems like the voice of a dear, familiar
Friend we carry within our hearts.
Attaining Authenticity
9. But if our inauthentic state renders us incapable of hearing the
Call of Conscience, how can we hear the same Call made by
another? If part of our lostness is loss of any conception of
ourselves as capable of any being other than being in the world,
how could the Call of the Friend penetrate our repression of
our authenticity? If it could, then surely we must already have
begun the very transition that the reception of the Call is
supposed to initiate. Clearly, if the Friend is to be heard, he
must first create the conditions for his own audibility. But how?
Attaining Authenticity
10. Our selfhood is lost in the Other.There is no ontological
differentiation in the impersonal Other between self and other,
and so no internal self-differentiation in its members. Lacking
any conception of authentic being, we conflate our existential
potential with our existential actuality, and repress our feeling of
uncanniness. However, when we encounter an authentic Friend,
his authentic mode of existence disrupts the undifferentiated
mass of the Other.The selfhood of the Friend is not lost in
slavish, mechanical identification with (or slavish
differentiation from) others.
Attaining Authenticity
11. The Friend does not mirror our impersonality, for that
would confirm it; he simply prevents us from relating to
him inauthentically.We can mirror another who exists as
individual and self-determining, and who relates to us
genuinely, only by relating to him as Other, and to
ourselves as other to that Other.That is, the authentic
Friend allows us to relate to him only as a separate, self-
determining individual.
Attaining Authenticity
12. An encounter with a genuine Other disrupts our lostness by
awakening otherness in ourselves. Our relation to that Other
overcomes our habitual assumptions of self-identity and
instantiates a mode of self-relation as other. It induces an anxious
realization of ourself as a separate, self-responsible being with a life
of our own, that we must lead.And so we realize our existence as
our own, non-relational and inevitable.This amounts to anxious
acknowledgement of our mortality, the existential pivot from self-
dispersal to self-integrity.The fact of the Friend’s existence creates
in us the precise conditions for hearing his Call to real individuality
as an echo or reflection of our ownVoice of Conscience.
Attaining Authenticity
13. Our conception of our default being as split, with its
capacity for authenticity eclipsing or being eclipsed
by its capacity for inauthenticity, applies to almost
everyone in the world. People everywhere are
immersed in the prevailing inauthentic modes of
everyday life, of being in the world. Everyone we
meet in ordinary life is inauthentic, although capable
of authenticity.
Attaining Authenticity
14. However, outlining an insightful fundamental ontology of our
being necessarily is an act of authentic being. Such a thing can be
done only by someone who, while not being immune to the
temptations of inauthenticity, has achieved an authentic mode of
human existence. Providing such a fundamental ontology to you
is an attempt to facilitate your transition from inauthentic to
authentic being.Thus, our relation to you precisely matches the
model of theVoice of Conscience, the Call of the Friend as we
have termed it.
Attaining Authenticity
15. We attempt to echo theVoice of Conscience to you, acting as a
representative of your own capacity for authentic Being.We do not
want to present you with blueprints for living. Rather, we confront
you with a portrait of yourself as mired in inauthenticity, Call you
to knowledge of yourself as capable of authentic thought, and
encourage you to overcome your repression of that capacity and
to think for yourself. Our presentation offers the Call of the Friend
as a pivot for self-transformation, as a mirror that reflects your
present inauthenticity, and as a medium through which you might
attain authenticity.
Attaining Authenticity
16. It is practically impossible for anyone to originate their own rebirth. Of
course, in claiming the capacity to present a fundamental ontology of
being, we claim a position of authenticity, implicitly declaring ourselves as
having transitioned from an inauthentic to an authentic mode of
existence.Yet we cannot present ourselves as having done so entirely on
our own resources.We have not single-handedly created this
fundamental ontology and this deconstruction of the way of being in the
world that we inherited.We cannot misrepresent our achievement as
solely and exclusively our own. In particular, we cannot ignore the role
our teachers played in the origination of our thinking and investigations.
For they in turn represented theVoice of Conscience and originated the
Call to us.
Attaining Authenticity
17. Let us recall how our analysis of conscience and guilt confirms
the implication of our analysis of death. In the act of being, we are
internally related to nothingness, nonexistence and negation.To
say that we are being guilty is to say that we are the basis of a
nullity—the absence of something—and hence that the ground of
our projections will always exceed our grasp.TheVoice of
Conscience is our discourse with the Friend of the Heart in the
mode of silence. It reveals that discourse as a dimension of
significance beyond the possibilities of any speech act.
Attaining Authenticity
18. Authentic listening doesn’t demand anything specific to happen in
the world; and so there is nothing specific that could constitute
its satisfaction.Any specific existential demands we think we hear
from the Voice of Conscience are solely our misinterpretation of
its silence.The silentVoice of Conscience actually condemns our
subjection to demand as unredeemable through satisfying any
specific demand.Authentic being is not to respond to any
particular demand made by the Other, but to choose a
possibility in any situation that is distinctively ours alone.
Attaining Authenticity
19. TheVoice of Conscience speaks against our habitual tendency
to conflate our existential potential with our existential
actuality. It silently opens up our internal otherness, our relation
to ourselves as other.This means we are not self-identical, but
rather transitional or self-transcending.This implies that
inauthenticity is a matter of our enacting an understanding of
ourself as essentially self-identical, as capable of coinciding with
ourselves and fulfilling our nature.Thus our being is perpetually
incomplete, always already projecting into future possibilities.
Attaining Authenticity
20. This internal split between our present and future self can be
resolved only by attaining integrity, where each choice we
make is in the consciousness of the realization of impending
death that we explored in Being in the World.We must find
the Friend of the Heart and submit our impulses, ideas and
desires to His advocacy, and the judgement of Conscience,
before actualizing them.That is the clear path to ontological
integrity and complete authenticity. However, this is impossible
without the help of the external Friend, a person who has
realized his own authentic Being.
Attaining Authenticity