The document discusses building antifragile investment portfolios that benefit from uncertainty and randomness. It recommends starting with a low-cost fund that provides global market exposure across multiple asset classes. This forms the core of an antifragile portfolio. It then suggests combining this with short-term treasuries to control downside risk. Specialist managers may also be added to gain incremental returns or leverage the overall portfolio if desired. The goal is to create a portfolio that can experience small losses but not catastrophic ones, while still preserving significant upside potential.
2. Life Is Full of Randomness and
Uncertainty
Some examples:
• Evolutionary changes in biological organisms.
• Genetics.
• Lottery winners.
• “Expert” forecasts.
• Global market returns.
Can we actually benefit from uncertainty, randomness,
disorder or volatility in our investing?
3. YES!
By Building Antifragile* Investment Portfolios
*Taleb, Nassim Nicholas. “Antifragile. Things That Gain From Disorder”. Random
House, 2012
4. Fragility
• Something fragile breaks when stressed or
something unexpected happens.
• But, something that is antifragile benefits
from stress, randomness, disorder or
uncertainty.
5. A fragile investor is one who owes $100,000 and
loses a job, an antifragile investor is one who has
$100,000 in savings.
Fragile Versus Antifragile
6. Antifragility
• Antifragility limits the adverse impact on us when bad
things happen.
• Antifragility does not mean avoiding bad things.
• Antifragility allows us to survive and prosper with the
uncertainty and randomness of life.
• Antifragility does not require advanced degrees.
• Antifragility does not require predicting the future.
• Antifragility does require accepting controlled stresses.
• Antifragility is not the same as certainty.
7. Antifragile Investing
• Investors who require a return which exceeds
the return of a risk free asset must assume
risk (stress).
• An antifragile investment portfolio benefits
from volatility, randomness and uncertainty
and has greater upside potential than
downside risk.
• Antifragile portfolios possess optionality.
8. What is Optionality?
• Optionality allows investors to take advantage
of opportunities or avoid assuming more
stress than desired.
• Optionality is a valuable trait of an antifragile
portfolio.
9. Some Investing Truths
• Market returns are mostly random and uncertain.
• Investors do not have control over global markets.
• Skilled, active managers exist but fewer of them exist than the
investment industry would have us believe exist.
• Even skilled active managers have cyclical periods of
underperformance.
• Most active manager excess returns are statistically random
outcomes: It takes from 11 to 44 years of return history to
determine, with 95% certainty, whether an active manager
has skill or is just lucky.
• Investors do not have control over active manager returns.
11. More Truths….
• Investment fees and expenses are one of the
things an investor can control.
• Investment fees and expenses matter.
• Investors tend to feel losses more acutely than
gains, so managing down-side risk is important.
• Investors also control the risks they choose to
assume.
12. Conclusions
• Investors should focus on controlling what
they can actually control.
• Investors should build antifragile investment
portfolios that benefit from randomness and
uncertainty.
• Investors should measure success over years
and not quarter-by-quarter.
13. Some Basic Theory
William Sharpe’s market portfolio concept (1964)
• Best expected return for the market risk assumed.
• He called this the “efficient” market portfolio.
Eugene Fama’s Efficient Market Theory (1970)
• Market prices reflect all known information relating to
the price of an asset.
• Only new information has an impact on prices.
• Each asset should have the same price in all global
markets if markets are efficient.
• Implies that active management should not add value.
14. Sharpe’s Global Market Portfolio
- Market Risk +
--ExpectedReturn++
Global Market
Portfolio of all
investible risk assets Levered GMP:
GMP + borrowing
De-levered GMP:
GMP + Risk Free
Asset
Risk Free Asset
15. What Does The Actual Global Market
Portfolio Look Like?
– $150 trillion in global markets*
• 67% was debt/bonds ($100 trillion)
– US bond market was about 24% of total global debt
• 33% was equities ($50 trillion)
– US stock market is about 50% of total global equities
– 67%/33% allocation implies an expected return of
about 4% annually to the global markets portfolio.
*2012 Bank for International Settlements (BIS) quarterly global review of
bank holdings report.
16. Investment Risk Considerations
• Some investment risk has expected returns.
• Some risks have no expected returns.
• Investors need to understand their risk
tolerances.
• Investors should avoid uncompensated risks.
• Volatility by itself is not compensable.
17. Examples of Compensated Risk
• Market risks
– Risk relative to the global market portfolio
– Size (small stocks have outperformed large)
– Low price-to-book stocks (unloved stocks)
– Term (longer maturity bonds have outperformed)
– Credit quality (lower quality has outperformed)
• Leverage
• Liquidity
18. Examples of Uncompensated Risk
• Idiosyncratic risk- lack of adequate diversification.
• Fees- A form of wealth transfer. Higher fees do not
necessarily result in better returns, just wealthier
investment managers.
• Active Risk- Few active managers have demonstrated
statistically significant, persistent skill. Fama’s efficient
markets theory implies that positive excess returns
should not exist if markets are efficient.
• Principal-Agent risk- what is good for the agent is not
always good for the principal (investor).
19. Building Antifragile Portfolios
• Consider Sharpe’s global market portfolio.
– Diversified across markets and asset classes.
• Combine the global market portfolio with the risk
free asset to de-lever the market portfolio or to
manage down-side risk.
• Or, lever up by borrowing or using small cap
stocks, emerging markets, high yield bonds,
private markets in higher % than they are found in
the global market portfolio (a form of leverage).
20. Some Considerations
• A de-levered global market portfolio has lower
risk and a lower expected return than the
GMP.
• A levered global market portfolio has higher
risk and a higher expected return than the
GMP.
• Investor down-side risk tolerances and return
requirements are important.
21. Building Antifragile Portfolios
• Start with a mutual fund or ETF with global,
multi-asset class market exposures.
• Combine it with a US treasury bill to control
down-side risk or to manage liquidity.
• Add specialist managers/funds to add
incremental value or lever up the GMP if
needed (examples include emerging markets debt,
small cap stocks, commodities, REITs).
22. The Antifragile Portfolio
• Global markets portfolio (95% ticker AOR)
– Global equities (60%)
• US equities (large, mid and small)
• Non-US equities (large and mid)
• Emerging markets equities (large and mid)
– Bonds (40%)
• USD denominated bonds (US and non-US issuers)
• US treasuries (all maturities > 1 year)
• US credits (investment grade, non-investment grade)
• US Treasury Bill (5% UST)
• Cost: = .24% annually (plus advisor’s fees)
23. Antifragile Portfolio Benefits
• You have a globally diversified GMP proxy which benefits from
the unpredictability and randomness of global asset returns.
• You have built an investment portfolio that can experience
small but not catastrophic losses.
• You control the level of down-side risk you assume by
combining the GMP with a risk free asset.
• You can control investment expenses.
• You have preserved the majority of your up-side return
potential and possess optionality.
• Your portfolio is theoretically supported.
• You have reduced your stress and simplified your life.
24. Thank you for your time.
Feel Free to Contact Us
Greg Johnsen, CFA
Eastgate Advisors, llc
gjohnsen@eastgateadv.com
Editor's Notes
Do global markets have a major impact on the returns we earn in our investment portfolios?
Optionality is a valuable characteristic. It allows you to take advantage of investment opportunities or provide low cost liquidity.
T-stat of 1.65 = IR * sqrt of N. The greater the volatility of active returns, the longer it takes, with 95% certainty, to determine skill or luck.
Fees eat up a large portion of investor gross returns. Active mutual funds charge about 1% and an advisor will also charge about 1% for their services so if an investor has a 50% equity and 50% bond portfolio with an expected return of about 4%-5%, fees can eat up 40% or more of the gross return. Fees and expenses matter.