2. 2
“Silos build the walls in people’s minds
and tie the knots in their hearts.”
― Pearl Zhu
3. 3
OUTCOMES:
• Get the latest techniques in developing high performing, cross functioning teams
• Guidance and advice on creating a one-team-collaborative culture
• Activities to explore organisational issues
• Practical tips and strategies for approaching silos today
• Your next steps in breaking down silos within your organisation including a
feedforward exercise to complete across teams.
6. ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: IT’S A TEAM SPORT
The shift from hierarchies to cross-functional
teams is well underway.
Need to educate leaders on how to operate in
cross-functional teams and reconfigure
rewards and performance management to
support team performance.
The ability to lead through influence is a
requirement for 21st-century leadership.
7. LEADERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: THE INTERSECTION OF THE
TRADITIONAL AND THE NEW
In a disrupted world, organizations are
challenging their leaders to step up and
show the way forward.
C-suite executives are being asked to work
more collaboratively across functions; line
leaders must learn to operate in networks of
teams.
21st-century leadership has new
requirements - inclusion, fairness, social
responsibility, understanding the role of
automation, and leading in a network.
8. FROM EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE TO HUMAN EXPERIENCE: PUTTING MEANING
BACK INTO WORK
The most important factor of all is the work
itself: making work meaningful and giving
people a sense of belonging, trust, and
relationship.
Organizations should shift thinking about
experience at work in terms of perks,
rewards, or support, and focus on job fit, job
design, and meaning.
Enterprises with a top-quartile employee
experience achieve twice the innovation,
double the customer satisfaction, and 25
percent higher profits
9. GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT STUDY - ADP RESEARCH INSTITUTE
1) Global engagement levels have not changed much in the past three years overall.
2) Being on a team increases engagement 2.3 times.
3) The challenge for almost all organizations today is that they are not set up to know very
much about their teams.
4) Most work happens in functional teams that can be fluid, depending on the project.
5) 64% of people surveyed report that they work on more than one team, and 75% report that
their teams are not represented in their employer’s organization chart.
6) Trust in team leaders is the no.1 foundation of engagement.
Global Study of Engagement, ADP research institute, led by Marcus Buckingham, 19,346 employees across 19 countries
10. PwC’s 22nd CEO Survey -Widening gaps and a positivity lapse
11. OTHER TRENDS THAT INFLUENCE THE NEED FOR COLLABORATION
Research by PWC reveals how seldom companies successfully work across silos:
Only about a third (36 percent) of companies prioritize a few cross-functional
capabilities at the company level and expect functional leaders to identify how
they contribute to the mission.
More than half (55 percent) of companies work in silos, with each function
making its own decisions on which capabilities matter most.
Three out of five companies (61 percent) say the solution to reaching their
strategic goals is collaborating more across functions, paired with faster decision
making.
Dealing with market disruption and seven strategies for breaking down silos, PWC strategy report 2016
12. THE IMPACT OF SILOS
1) Limits communication and impedes culture
2) Creates repeat work
3) Blocks information from those who need it
Dealing with market disruption and seven strategies for breaking down silos
PWC strategy report 2016
13. THE PSYCHOLOGY OF GROUPS
Tribalism - the behaviour and attitudes that
stem from strong loyalty to one's own tribe or
social group.
Identification is "the appropriation of
identity, either (1) by the individual or
collective in question or (2) by others.
Identification includes "the development and
maintenance of an individual's or group's
'sameness' or 'substance' against a backdrop
of change and 'outside' elements.
Relatedness – One of the 3 fundamental
psychological needs of people based on Deci
and Ryan’s Self determination theory.
Blame/avoidance focus
or solution focus?
15. Dealing with market disruption and seven strategies for breaking down silos, PWC strategy report 2016
16. 1) BREAKING DOWN ORGANISATION LEVEL SILOS - MODAL’S RECOMMENDATIONS
Get the Executive team clear and aligned on
organisational priorities and focused on healthy
dynamics within their team
Identify and set up cross-functional teams – e.g.
culture results management team, project teams,
employee rep group
Run culture and leadership summit with top 3-4
levels of leadership
Cascade key culture mindset message down into
the organisation e.g. ‘One team, one direction’,
“together we win’
Introduce employees to the use of a common
enterprise social network app e.g. Microsoft
Yammer/Teams, Slack
17. 2) BREAKING DOWN SILOS BETWEEN TWO DEPARTMENTS - MODAL’S
RECOMMENDATIONS
Work with the leaders of the two departments,
to align on the desire to have their areas work
together more effectively.
Have the two leaders meet and discuss what’s
working well and what 1-2 key challenges if
overcome would create more win-win.
Organise alignment conversations between
two departments to clarify the goals,
expectations and commitments of each group.
Take an appreciative inquiry approach in the
first instance if you want to minimise
defensiveness.
18. 3) BREAKING DOWN SILOS WITHIN A TEAM - MODAL’S RECOMMENDATIONS
Build trust and psychological safety
Establish the team’s purpose and a set of
principles for how the team will interact with
each other
Surface conflict – Teams where members hang
onto emotional upsets, don’t move forward.
Clarify shared goals and accountabilities of the
team.
Build commitment to team goals – set up
meeting routines and agendas that allow not just
information sharing but joint problem
solving/decision making.
One of the fundamental changes in business today is the steady shift away from hierarchical models of management. Over the past few years, the terms “digital,” “agile,” and “network” have become commonplace. In our 2017 Global Human Capital Trends survey, “building the organization of the future” was the No. 1 trend respondents identified, with 88 percent viewing it as important or very important. Eight percent of this year’s survey respondents told us they now operate almost wholly in teams, with another 23 percent saying that most work is done in teams within a hierarchical framework (figure 1). And 65 percent of our respondents rated the ability to lead through influence as a requirement for 21st-century leadership, building management models around persuasion.
The shift from hierarchies to cross-functional teams is well underway. Our data shows that adopting team structures improves organizational performance for those that have made the journey; organizations that have not risk falling further behind.
building management models around persuasion.
Over the last five years, issues related to productivity, well-being, overwork, and burnout have grown.2 The digital, always-on world of work has been challenging for people (as we discussed last year and in 2014), and organizations have become increasingly concerned. And based on the results from our study, it’s clear that those issues have resulted in significant dissatisfaction with the job itself. This year, we found that only 49 percent of respondents believed that their organizations’ workers were satisfied or very satisfied with their job design. Only 42 percent thought that workers were satisfied or very satisfied with day-to-day work practices, only 38 percent said that they were satisfied or very satisfied with work-related tools and technology, and only 38 percent thought that they have enough autonomy to make good decisions (figure 1).
Organizations are investing in many programs to improve life at work, all focused on improving the day-to-day experience workers have. While there is much that can be done to improve work/life balance, research shows that the most important factor of all is the work itself: making work meaningful and giving people a sense of belonging, trust, and relationship
MIT research shows that enterprises with a top-quartile employee experience achieve twice the innovation, double the customer satisfaction, and 25 percent higher profits than organizations with a bottom-quartile employee experience.
When we examined the most engaged teams, we found that, by far, the best explainer of level of Engagement was whether or not the team members trust their team leader. Knowing what is expected and using one’s strengths make engaged teams.
I have argued that cross-functional teamwork, long recognized as vital to innovation, is today more about teaming than about creating formal teams. Teaming involves coordinating and collaborating in fluid configurations – rather than in well-bounded stable teams, which are often impractical in global, 24/7 operations.
I recently had the opportunity to collaborate with researchers at IBM on the Global C-Suite Study 2017, which surveyed 12,800 CxOs across diverse, competitive industries about their priorities and views on the future. One key finding is that executives from leading companies were significantly more focused on developing people and cultures, compared to their counterparts and to their own views in the past.
Specifically, the study finds that forward-thinking CxOs are especially committed to creating organizational structures and operations that support collaboration and experimentation. By recognizing the limitations of top-down control in highly uncertain and dynamic environments, these leaders are shifting to structures that foster autonomy and enable employees to shape their enterprise’s strategic direction. A key focus of these market leaders is indeed the creation of fluid work structures to enable cross-functional teaming. They understand that this only happens when the company has a learning culture that supports speaking up and taking risks.
Amy C. Edmondson, Novartis Professor of Leadership and Management, Harvard Business School
Limits communication and impedes culture—Siloed teams eventually inhibit your company’s culture. Employees crave communication, collaboration and a thriving work environment. They want to feel comfortable being themselves and feel like they’re part of a team. In fact, 47 percent of workers find it motivating when colleagues discuss workplace success.
Creates repeat work—Often, you frustratingly discover that someone else at your company (most likely on another team or in a different department) is doing the same work or looking for the same information. When teams are in the dark on other teams’ projects, it can severely impact your business’s productivity
Blocks information from those who need it—The average interaction worker spends nearly 20 percent of their work week looking for internal information or tracking down colleagues who can help with specific tasks.
London Marathon story about booing people who have a different colour marker from 3 starting groups
Deindividuation: a psychological state of decreased self-evaluation and decreased evaluation apprehension causing antinormative and disinhibited behavior – linked to group identification
In 1980, Ed Diener (professor of psychology and Gallup researcher) argued that paying attention to one's personal values through self-awareness increases the ability of that person to self-regulate. In a group context, when attention is distributed outward (in line with this model) away from the self, the individual loses the ability to plan his actions rationally and substitutes planned behaviors with a heightened responsiveness to environmental cues
By recognizing the limitations of top-down control in highly uncertain and dynamic environments, these leaders are shifting to structures that foster autonomy and enable employees to shape their enterprise’s strategic direction. A key focus of these market leaders is indeed the creation of fluid work structures to enable cross-functional teaming. They understand that this only happens when the company has a learning culture that supports speaking up and taking risks (Amy Edmondson)
Have the Executive team
- Define a single shared thematic goal
- Build trust
- Develop accountability
- Clarify the critical few mindsets and behaviours to shift in the organisation
MODAL high Performing team model incorporates Patrick Lencioni’s 5 dysfunctions of a team framework as well as research from Jon Katzenbach and Steve Kozolowski