SlideShare a Scribd company logo
BOB KNOWLTON
CASE STUDY
PRESENTED BY:
SHREYA CHANDRA
BOB KNOWLTON
 Collaborative Team Leader
 Hard Working Man
 Confidence easily wavered by insecurities
 Does not voice out
DR. JERROLD
 The Director of Research & Supervisor of Bob
Knowlton Team
 Has very high expectations of those working under
him
 Not attentive
 Not a good motivator
SIMON FESTER
 A new comer to the company
 Brilliant
 Confident
 Aggressive
 Better prepared
 Opportunist
 Non-Participative
ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
 Effective Sharing of Goals
 Work group
 High Employee Morale
 Open system
 Leadership
THE ISSUES THAT LED TO A
PROBLEM IN THIS CASE:
 The entry of a new comer, Simon Fester in the organisation.
 Threat to Bob Knowlton as Simon Fester soon proved to be
more capable.
 Bob Knowlton soon started to feel insecure cause of Simon
Fester who was receiving too much attention.
 Everyone started to feel uncomfortable and the team started
falling apart.
 No one in the team bothered to step in when Simon Fester
was misusing his authority that the situation got out of hand.
IF I WERE DR.
JERROLD,
If I were Dr. Jerrold,
 I would have been more actively involved in the activities
of the team.
PERCEPTUAL ERRORS
 Fester’s perception that Knowlton is inefficient
 Fester perception that he can handle the processes
alone without ant team participation
 Bob Knowlton thinking evaluating himself
 Bob Knowlton perceived that Jerrold wants to
appoint his duties to Fester(because of their private
meetings)
 Both of them perceived each other in wrongful way
and evaluated themselves incorrectly
WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE
BETTER
BOB KNOWLTON
 Focusing on his own strengths
 Identifying his own areas
 Considering speaking to his supervisor
DR. JERROLD
 Utilization of interpersonal communication skills
 Involvement with the meetings
THANK
YOU

More Related Content

What's hot

Nucor Case Anlaysis
Nucor Case AnlaysisNucor Case Anlaysis
Nucor Case Anlaysis
Kaushambi Ghosh
 
Vitality Health Enterprise Performance Management
Vitality Health Enterprise Performance ManagementVitality Health Enterprise Performance Management
Vitality Health Enterprise Performance Management
Fadila Pratika Alimuddin
 
Bayonne packaging Case Study Analysis
Bayonne packaging Case Study AnalysisBayonne packaging Case Study Analysis
Bayonne packaging Case Study Analysis
Prashanth Sridhar
 
Nitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimitedNitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimited
Shashank Shukla
 
Jabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and Suppliers
Jabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and SuppliersJabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and Suppliers
Jabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and Suppliers
Saiteja Pamu
 
Krishna Rubber Company
Krishna Rubber CompanyKrishna Rubber Company
Krishna Rubber Company
Argha Ray
 
Ipremier case
Ipremier caseIpremier case
Ipremier case
Fabian Okidi
 
Recruitment of a star
Recruitment of a starRecruitment of a star
Recruitment of a star
Prerna Mishra
 
Colgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case Study
Colgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case StudyColgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case Study
Colgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case Study
TANUSHREE BOSE
 
Bayonne packaging final ppt
Bayonne packaging final pptBayonne packaging final ppt
Bayonne packaging final ppt
pooja Khetwal
 
Nucor Case Analysis
Nucor Case AnalysisNucor Case Analysis
Nucor Case Analysis
Bskwarski87
 
MediSys Corp- Case Study
MediSys Corp- Case Study MediSys Corp- Case Study
MediSys Corp- Case Study
Mudit Srivastava
 
Perils and Pitfalls - B6.pptx
Perils and Pitfalls - B6.pptxPerils and Pitfalls - B6.pptx
Perils and Pitfalls - B6.pptx
PriyatoshMitra
 
Morning Star Case Study
Morning Star Case Study Morning Star Case Study
Morning Star Case Study
Ashuvyas2128
 
Peak Stealing Technologies
Peak Stealing TechnologiesPeak Stealing Technologies
Peak Stealing Technologies
Kalpesh Bramhankar
 
Morgan stanley case
Morgan stanley caseMorgan stanley case
Morgan stanley case
Akash Parth Sarthi
 
EIS what we learned team2
EIS what we learned team2EIS what we learned team2
EIS what we learned team2
teamlamayae
 
Mind tree:A community of communities
Mind tree:A community of communitiesMind tree:A community of communities
Mind tree:A community of communities
Er Pradeep Pravin Kumar
 
Littlefield Simulation
Littlefield Simulation Littlefield Simulation
Littlefield Simulation
Kamal Gelya
 
RFID at Metro Group
RFID at Metro GroupRFID at Metro Group
RFID at Metro Group
Albert Winadi, CISA
 

What's hot (20)

Nucor Case Anlaysis
Nucor Case AnlaysisNucor Case Anlaysis
Nucor Case Anlaysis
 
Vitality Health Enterprise Performance Management
Vitality Health Enterprise Performance ManagementVitality Health Enterprise Performance Management
Vitality Health Enterprise Performance Management
 
Bayonne packaging Case Study Analysis
Bayonne packaging Case Study AnalysisBayonne packaging Case Study Analysis
Bayonne packaging Case Study Analysis
 
Nitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimitedNitish@solutions unlimited
Nitish@solutions unlimited
 
Jabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and Suppliers
Jabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and SuppliersJabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and Suppliers
Jabong: Balancing the Demads of Customers and Suppliers
 
Krishna Rubber Company
Krishna Rubber CompanyKrishna Rubber Company
Krishna Rubber Company
 
Ipremier case
Ipremier caseIpremier case
Ipremier case
 
Recruitment of a star
Recruitment of a starRecruitment of a star
Recruitment of a star
 
Colgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case Study
Colgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case StudyColgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case Study
Colgate Palmolive- Salary Offer Case Study
 
Bayonne packaging final ppt
Bayonne packaging final pptBayonne packaging final ppt
Bayonne packaging final ppt
 
Nucor Case Analysis
Nucor Case AnalysisNucor Case Analysis
Nucor Case Analysis
 
MediSys Corp- Case Study
MediSys Corp- Case Study MediSys Corp- Case Study
MediSys Corp- Case Study
 
Perils and Pitfalls - B6.pptx
Perils and Pitfalls - B6.pptxPerils and Pitfalls - B6.pptx
Perils and Pitfalls - B6.pptx
 
Morning Star Case Study
Morning Star Case Study Morning Star Case Study
Morning Star Case Study
 
Peak Stealing Technologies
Peak Stealing TechnologiesPeak Stealing Technologies
Peak Stealing Technologies
 
Morgan stanley case
Morgan stanley caseMorgan stanley case
Morgan stanley case
 
EIS what we learned team2
EIS what we learned team2EIS what we learned team2
EIS what we learned team2
 
Mind tree:A community of communities
Mind tree:A community of communitiesMind tree:A community of communities
Mind tree:A community of communities
 
Littlefield Simulation
Littlefield Simulation Littlefield Simulation
Littlefield Simulation
 
RFID at Metro Group
RFID at Metro GroupRFID at Metro Group
RFID at Metro Group
 

BOB KNOWLTON

  • 2. BOB KNOWLTON  Collaborative Team Leader  Hard Working Man  Confidence easily wavered by insecurities  Does not voice out
  • 3. DR. JERROLD  The Director of Research & Supervisor of Bob Knowlton Team  Has very high expectations of those working under him  Not attentive  Not a good motivator
  • 4. SIMON FESTER  A new comer to the company  Brilliant  Confident  Aggressive  Better prepared  Opportunist  Non-Participative
  • 5. ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS  Effective Sharing of Goals  Work group  High Employee Morale  Open system  Leadership
  • 6. THE ISSUES THAT LED TO A PROBLEM IN THIS CASE:  The entry of a new comer, Simon Fester in the organisation.  Threat to Bob Knowlton as Simon Fester soon proved to be more capable.  Bob Knowlton soon started to feel insecure cause of Simon Fester who was receiving too much attention.  Everyone started to feel uncomfortable and the team started falling apart.  No one in the team bothered to step in when Simon Fester was misusing his authority that the situation got out of hand.
  • 7. IF I WERE DR. JERROLD, If I were Dr. Jerrold,  I would have been more actively involved in the activities of the team.
  • 8. PERCEPTUAL ERRORS  Fester’s perception that Knowlton is inefficient  Fester perception that he can handle the processes alone without ant team participation  Bob Knowlton thinking evaluating himself  Bob Knowlton perceived that Jerrold wants to appoint his duties to Fester(because of their private meetings)  Both of them perceived each other in wrongful way and evaluated themselves incorrectly
  • 9. WHAT COULD HAVE BEEN DONE BETTER BOB KNOWLTON  Focusing on his own strengths  Identifying his own areas  Considering speaking to his supervisor DR. JERROLD  Utilization of interpersonal communication skills  Involvement with the meetings