The Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit to China where he will talk with his Chinese hosts about the many issues between United States and China. In particular the talks happens in a particular year for both countries and also for the whole world, in a context of low economic growth.
In this article the most important issues between China and United States will be considered and also the implications for the future of their relation and for the whole world.First, the visit will follow the meeting in person that President Xi Jinping and Joe Biden held in Indonesia during the G20 summit last November. It was their first meeting as leaders of their countries. At this meeting it was announced that Secretary of State Blinken will visit China during the first months of 2023.
The visit will happen in a moment when the world economy is in a difficult situation. According to the IMF, there is a probability that in this year 2023, of the three engines of world economy, two will experiment zero or negative growth. In Europe economic growth could be negative because, among other things, the war in Ukraine increased price of energy and food, and inflation is putting a pressure in the economy. Also, in United States the fight against inflations has increased interest rates and this is also putting a drag in economic growth with some projections pointing to a zero growth in its economy. The only engine that could move the world economy is China, but this country is also facing some challenges, among them, the normalization after the dismantling of its zero covid-19 policy.
The document discusses the relationship between the US and China in 2020 according to the "two-good theory". The theory predicts that as China's economic and military power increases, it will seek more policy changes internationally. This is exemplified by China's territorial disputes with neighbors and calls to replace the US dollar as the global reserve currency. Meanwhile, as US influence declines relatively, it will prioritize maintaining the status quo. The future relationship will test this theory as China continues pursuing changes while the US seeks to preserve its interests.
Comparative Analysis of US China Relations during Trump Administrationijtsrd
This article examines crucial issues in the US Chinese relations during the Trump administration considering the issues like Trade war and geopolitical situation in Asia Pacific region. This research explores the main directions of Sino American relations in the period of presidency of Donald Trump, as well as the recent trends and perspectives on cooperation between the two states. The following conclusions are coming to end First, the U.S. government can continue, in the nearest future, to put pressure on China on issues such as human rights, civil society development, and Internet freedom. This pressure will be reflected in China, especially among educated youth and the growing middle class. The preservation and consolidation of American positions in the waters of the Pacific and Indian Oceans is forcing Beijing to focus on the resource and transit potential of mainland Eurasia One Belt One Road , highlighting the growing importance of Russia and Central Asia for China’s strategy. Second, the U.S. administration’s attitude toward China remains moderate, despite occasional changes. The tendency for bilateral dialogue and mutually beneficial cooperation prevails. Third, there was unequivocal support from both houses of Congress for the Trump administration’s new tough demands on China. Existing problems between the parties, in particular, China’s close cooperation with Russia, further complicate the situation to the detriment of China. Fourth, the positive development of bilateral relations will contribute to ensuring international political, economic, environmental stability and global security. Fifth, China’s economic development and growing international position are intensifying competition in bilateral relations not only in the Asia Pacific region, but also in the rest of regions of the Globe. Uchkun Dustov "Comparative Analysis of US- China Relations during Trump Administration" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-2 , February 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd38540.pdf Paper Url: https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/political-science/38540/comparative-analysis-of-us-china-relations-during-trump-administration/uchkun-dustov
Strategy on east asia the strategic choices for beijing, tokyo and moscowAlexander Decker
1. The document discusses Washington's "Returning to Asia" strategy and its potential impacts on East Asia. The strategy has two pillars: promoting the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement and redeploying US military forces in the Asia-Pacific region.
2. It analyzes the strategic choices available to China, Japan, and Russia in response to the US strategy. For China, it suggests continuing to advance trade agreements with ASEAN while remaining open to TPP, using trade leverage in territorial disputes, and being prepared to counter Japanese militarism with force if needed.
3. For all regional powers, managing tensions and conflicts will be important to prevent deterioration of the security situation in East Asia
China is facing several challenges amid uncertainties surrounding the world economy and politics. Among them are the world post COVID 19 pandemics, the war in Europe and the increasing in intensity by the United State of its competition and technological war against China. But China also faces several challenges from within. How will these affect the Chinese economy and how will impact Latin America and Peru?
The founder of Alibaba Jack Ma said that the war will continue for 20 years. The trade war takes a new tern to a war of supremacy of technology. It has been presumed that the next new administration in Washington even cannot withdraw the trade war and it will continue till the raise of China to number one economy of the world toppling USA or until loss of relevance of such war to both the parties.
The EDCA and its implications under a Realism LensGABGABRIEL8
The document discusses the implications of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) between the US and Philippines under a realism lens. It summarizes the core assumptions of realism, including states prioritizing their own security above all else. Under realism, the US seeks to maintain regional hegemony by countering China's growing influence, while the Philippines balances the two powers by expanding US military access. Rising tensions in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait have also contributed to the US expanding its defense partnership with the Philippines.
This document discusses challenges facing continued American global leadership in the 21st century. It outlines geopolitical tensions between countries like China, Japan, and South Korea over disputed islands that could undermine American alliances. Ongoing financial crises in Western Europe and the Middle East also threaten American strategic interests. While America has contributed greatly to human progress, its image has been damaged by issues like the Iraq war and treatment of veterans. The upcoming 2012 presidential election will be important for addressing these challenges and improving America's global standing through strengthened alliances, balanced policies, and moral leadership.
The document discusses leadership changes in China and the US and the challenges in the relationship between the two countries. It summarizes Xi Jinping's diplomatic visit to the US in February as he prepared to take over leadership in China. While there are disagreements, both countries recognize their economic interdependence and the importance of cooperation. The leadership transitions in both countries will shape how China-US relations are redefined during a time of global challenges.
The document discusses the relationship between the US and China in 2020 according to the "two-good theory". The theory predicts that as China's economic and military power increases, it will seek more policy changes internationally. This is exemplified by China's territorial disputes with neighbors and calls to replace the US dollar as the global reserve currency. Meanwhile, as US influence declines relatively, it will prioritize maintaining the status quo. The future relationship will test this theory as China continues pursuing changes while the US seeks to preserve its interests.
Comparative Analysis of US China Relations during Trump Administrationijtsrd
This article examines crucial issues in the US Chinese relations during the Trump administration considering the issues like Trade war and geopolitical situation in Asia Pacific region. This research explores the main directions of Sino American relations in the period of presidency of Donald Trump, as well as the recent trends and perspectives on cooperation between the two states. The following conclusions are coming to end First, the U.S. government can continue, in the nearest future, to put pressure on China on issues such as human rights, civil society development, and Internet freedom. This pressure will be reflected in China, especially among educated youth and the growing middle class. The preservation and consolidation of American positions in the waters of the Pacific and Indian Oceans is forcing Beijing to focus on the resource and transit potential of mainland Eurasia One Belt One Road , highlighting the growing importance of Russia and Central Asia for China’s strategy. Second, the U.S. administration’s attitude toward China remains moderate, despite occasional changes. The tendency for bilateral dialogue and mutually beneficial cooperation prevails. Third, there was unequivocal support from both houses of Congress for the Trump administration’s new tough demands on China. Existing problems between the parties, in particular, China’s close cooperation with Russia, further complicate the situation to the detriment of China. Fourth, the positive development of bilateral relations will contribute to ensuring international political, economic, environmental stability and global security. Fifth, China’s economic development and growing international position are intensifying competition in bilateral relations not only in the Asia Pacific region, but also in the rest of regions of the Globe. Uchkun Dustov "Comparative Analysis of US- China Relations during Trump Administration" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-5 | Issue-2 , February 2021, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd38540.pdf Paper Url: https://www.ijtsrd.com/humanities-and-the-arts/political-science/38540/comparative-analysis-of-us-china-relations-during-trump-administration/uchkun-dustov
Strategy on east asia the strategic choices for beijing, tokyo and moscowAlexander Decker
1. The document discusses Washington's "Returning to Asia" strategy and its potential impacts on East Asia. The strategy has two pillars: promoting the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) trade agreement and redeploying US military forces in the Asia-Pacific region.
2. It analyzes the strategic choices available to China, Japan, and Russia in response to the US strategy. For China, it suggests continuing to advance trade agreements with ASEAN while remaining open to TPP, using trade leverage in territorial disputes, and being prepared to counter Japanese militarism with force if needed.
3. For all regional powers, managing tensions and conflicts will be important to prevent deterioration of the security situation in East Asia
China is facing several challenges amid uncertainties surrounding the world economy and politics. Among them are the world post COVID 19 pandemics, the war in Europe and the increasing in intensity by the United State of its competition and technological war against China. But China also faces several challenges from within. How will these affect the Chinese economy and how will impact Latin America and Peru?
The founder of Alibaba Jack Ma said that the war will continue for 20 years. The trade war takes a new tern to a war of supremacy of technology. It has been presumed that the next new administration in Washington even cannot withdraw the trade war and it will continue till the raise of China to number one economy of the world toppling USA or until loss of relevance of such war to both the parties.
The EDCA and its implications under a Realism LensGABGABRIEL8
The document discusses the implications of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) between the US and Philippines under a realism lens. It summarizes the core assumptions of realism, including states prioritizing their own security above all else. Under realism, the US seeks to maintain regional hegemony by countering China's growing influence, while the Philippines balances the two powers by expanding US military access. Rising tensions in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait have also contributed to the US expanding its defense partnership with the Philippines.
This document discusses challenges facing continued American global leadership in the 21st century. It outlines geopolitical tensions between countries like China, Japan, and South Korea over disputed islands that could undermine American alliances. Ongoing financial crises in Western Europe and the Middle East also threaten American strategic interests. While America has contributed greatly to human progress, its image has been damaged by issues like the Iraq war and treatment of veterans. The upcoming 2012 presidential election will be important for addressing these challenges and improving America's global standing through strengthened alliances, balanced policies, and moral leadership.
The document discusses leadership changes in China and the US and the challenges in the relationship between the two countries. It summarizes Xi Jinping's diplomatic visit to the US in February as he prepared to take over leadership in China. While there are disagreements, both countries recognize their economic interdependence and the importance of cooperation. The leadership transitions in both countries will shape how China-US relations are redefined during a time of global challenges.
The document analyzes trade relations between the US and China over time. It discusses how the two nations have become highly economically interdependent, with China manufacturing many inexpensive goods for American consumers and relying heavily on the US market. However, tensions exist due to the US trade deficit with China and accusations that China keeps its currency artificially low. The financial crisis further strained relations and led to "Buy American" policies on both sides. Any major changes in policies could significantly damage both economies due to their close ties.
The document summarizes the ongoing trade wars between several countries. It discusses the trade war between the US and China, with both countries imposing tariffs on billions of goods traded between them. It also covers the trade tensions between the US and Turkey, with the US imposing sanctions on Turkey unless an American pastor detained in Turkey is released. These trade wars are pushing Turkey closer to allying with Iran and Qatar and away from the West. While the US dollar and economy may benefit in the short term, the document argues the trade wars will ultimately weaken US geopolitical influence by strengthening ties between countries opposed to Western interests.
The document summarizes the ongoing trade and technology conflict between the US and China. It began as a trade issue in 2018 but has since escalated and expanded to other areas as both countries take measures against each other. The fundamental reason for the conflict is the rising economic and technological competition between the two powers. The US accuses China of unfair trade practices and technology theft. Both countries have imposed tariffs and other restrictions on each other's goods and companies. The conflict could continue depending on the outcome of the US presidential election, but Peru should maintain balanced relations with both countries and not take sides.
United States is implementing a series of measures to try to cut off its dependence from China in certain areas, or to deny China access to certain technologies. In this sense, US is enlisting the help of some of its allies, as seen in the case of its effort to cut the flow of advanced semiconductors to China, as in the formation of the Chips 4 Alliance. Japan and Taiwan seem to be already on board in this idea. Netherlands, not a member of that alliance, is also participating. Still South Korea has not officially joined the Alliance.
What about Peru? Can Peru join in the effort to isolate China as US is planning to do? What, if any, can Peru do in that regard?
In this article a look at that issue is given. First, a brief review of Peru relations with China and US is given; second, in which areas could Peru cooperate with US effort is analyzed; and lastly, it is seen if really Peru can join that effort.
This document summarizes China-Latin America economic relations over the past few decades and considers possible scenarios for how the relationship may evolve. It notes that China has become a major trading partner and investor for many Latin American countries as its demand for commodities has driven growth. However, concerns include Latin America's dependence on raw material exports and potential impacts from a slowdown in China's economy. The document explores scenarios for sustained Chinese growth, a moderate slowdown, or a hard landing and associated effects on Latin America. It also discusses the diverse policy responses across the region to Chinese engagement.
Summary - The Road to Global ProsperityAlberto Rocha
- The document summarizes Michael Mandelbaum's book "The Road to Global Prosperity" which argues that international economic growth and cooperation are essential for global stability and prosperity.
- It discusses the economic rise of emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRICs) but also notes their political and economic challenges. While the BRICs saw strong growth, they face issues like corruption, overreliance on commodities, poverty, and pollution.
- It also analyzes the 2008 global financial crisis, noting the US housing bubble and eurozone crisis exposed flaws in both systems and imbalances like high US debt and Chinese oversaving that remain issues. International cooperation on trade and addressing economic tensions
Threats of trade war between china and usaM S Siddiqui
Free trade has supported the growth of the post-World War II world economy. If an all-out trade war were to break out between major powers, it would rock the foundations for growth. The United States and China are responsible for not only maintaining international security but also stabilizing the world economy.
- America's renewed military aggression is a front for its financial war strategy, according to China's perspective. America uses the dollar's global role to artificially create economic booms and busts in other countries for its own benefit.
- China sees America as having transitioned to a "virtual economy" reliant on printing money and issuing debt. America draws dollars back in from overseas markets by raising risks in those markets and lowering risks in U.S. markets like Treasuries.
- China believes America caused the Latin American debt crisis of the 1970s and Asian Financial Crisis of the 1990s through these dollar pump-and-dump operations. China will coordinate with Russia to respond to continued American aggression.
The document discusses the trade war between the US and China. It provides background on how the conflict began with the US imposing tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods and China retaliating with tariffs on $110 billion of US goods. A key reason for tensions is the large US trade deficit with China. The trade war is negatively impacting both economies and global markets. Several rounds of escalating tariffs are outlined from 2018 to 2019.
Causes and possible consequences of the us china trade warHüseyin Tekler
When we look at the history of the known humanity, it appears that people started living in communities and that private property has emerged due to the progress of historical conditions. One of the consequences of this outcome is that world history is the scene of many wars and destruction. When it comes to war, it is armed struggles that take place between countries or political groups that come to mind first. Looking at this perspective, we see that the historical development process is also seen as the great majority of battles take place as physical battles, but it has become possible to say that, with great physical battles, technological and economic developments, sword-fighting and armed wars have begun to shift to economic and cultural wars. This new form of war has begun to take place on the stage of history on the basis of economic instruments. As an example of economic warfare, protectionism can be shown by countries in the direction of their own economic interests. It would not be wrong to say that the currency wars and the wars of trade that brought about by the protectionist policies of the countries, especially in the crisis period, will be the most important economic problem of our time. Throughout history, all wars have led to great destruction, and generally underdeveloped countries and poor countries have been affected by these destructions, and it is not wrong to say that the economic wars, as well as physical wars, will effect the least developed countries and the poor countries.
In this analysis, in the light of the historical background of protectionism, a trade war and the possible consequences of this war, which could be caused by the mutually elevated trade walls of the US and China, were examined.
The document discusses U.S.-China strategic relations and tensions over Taiwan. It summarizes a Pentagon report on China's growing military capabilities and China's protests against the report. It also discusses Vice President Biden's recent visit to China to boost relations and reassure China on economic issues. However, tensions remain over Taiwan, which the U.S. is legally obligated to aid defensively, despite China's stance that Taiwan is part of China.
The trade war between the United States and China began in 2018 and has escalated over time with both countries imposing tariffs on billions of dollars worth of each other's goods. The trade war has had mixed effects on both economies, hurting some industries but boosting others. It has also slowed global economic growth and disrupted international supply chains. While some short-term gains have been made by both sides, the long-term costs of a prolonged trade war could outweigh any benefits as it damages economic relationships and cooperation.
FROM THE NEW COLD WAR, FROM THE TRADE WAR, FROM THE FINANCIAL WAR AND FROM TH...Faga1939
This article aims to present the characteristics of modern warfare based on in-depth research on the march of the new Cold War between the United States and Russia, the trade war between the United States and China and its consequences, financial warfare as a weapon of modern warfare, cybernetic warfare as a modern warfare, the inevitability or not of the 3rd World War, the causes of violence and wars in the world to, in the end, present how to eliminate wars on the planet. The new Cold War results from the fact that the United States and NATO forces are expanding their presence on Russia's borders. The trade warfare was triggered by the United States against China to prevent this country from assuming the status of hegemonic economic power on the planet. Financial warfare has been unleashed by the United States, against its enemies such as Iran, Russia and China, with the aim of degrading the capabilities of its enemies and subjugating them with the adoption of economic and financial sanctions, while seeking advantage geopolitics in specific areas to bring the enemy country to a state of near collapse and paralysis, to financial catastrophe while advancing on other fronts. Cyber warfare is being unleashed by the United States, Russia, China, among other countries to attack computers and networks of enemy countries that affect resources necessary for war by studying the system deeply to discover its flaws and using these flaws to control this system or destroy it. The decline of the United States and the economic rise of China, which may assume the condition of the greatest world power in the mid-21st century, may trigger the 3rd World War in the face of the tension created between them. Parallel to the effort to educate all human beings with the culture of peace, it is necessary to put into practice a democratic governance of the world to prevent the recurrence of new world wars. This is the only means of survival for the human species and to stop the decay of humanity.
Goldman Sachs Article: The rise of geopolitical swing statesEnergy for One World
This document discusses the rise of "geopolitical swing states" - countries that have significant economic advantages and global influence but pursue their own agendas independent of the US and China. These countries fall into four categories: 1) those with advantages in global supply chains, 2) those suited for offshoring/nearshoring, 3) those with significant capital to invest globally, and 4) developed economies with leaders pursuing global visions. As great power competition increases between the US and China, these swing states will have more influence in shaping the global order to serve their own interests through multi-alignment strategies.
The document discusses several potential major economic and geopolitical themes for 2023. It suggests that the Federal Reserve and China may both pursue "soft pivots" away from the very tight monetary policies of 2022, gradually making their stances less restrictive. It also notes that 2023 may see relative political stability in major countries due to a lack of elections in G7 nations. Additionally, it posits that countries may further weaponize trade in the coming year by restricting certain exports or foreign assets. Finally, it explores how geopolitical tensions could contribute to the formation of two separate semiconductor manufacturing ecosystems centered around the US and China.
1) The author argues that Americans should care about Brexit because it could negatively impact peace and prosperity in Europe by fueling nationalist movements and potentially causing countries to leave the EU.
2) A breakdown of the EU single market through Brexit would make trade and travel across Europe more complicated and costly for both European countries and American companies doing business in Europe.
3) Brexit could weaken the UK's role as a gateway for US businesses to access the EU single market, negatively impacting the $558 billion US companies have invested in the UK.
The trade connection between the US and China has been quite possibly one of the most complex and significant across the globe. As the world's two biggest economies, their respective trade has critical ramifications for worldwide trade and international relations.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
The document analyzes trade relations between the US and China over time. It discusses how the two nations have become highly economically interdependent, with China manufacturing many inexpensive goods for American consumers and relying heavily on the US market. However, tensions exist due to the US trade deficit with China and accusations that China keeps its currency artificially low. The financial crisis further strained relations and led to "Buy American" policies on both sides. Any major changes in policies could significantly damage both economies due to their close ties.
The document summarizes the ongoing trade wars between several countries. It discusses the trade war between the US and China, with both countries imposing tariffs on billions of goods traded between them. It also covers the trade tensions between the US and Turkey, with the US imposing sanctions on Turkey unless an American pastor detained in Turkey is released. These trade wars are pushing Turkey closer to allying with Iran and Qatar and away from the West. While the US dollar and economy may benefit in the short term, the document argues the trade wars will ultimately weaken US geopolitical influence by strengthening ties between countries opposed to Western interests.
The document summarizes the ongoing trade and technology conflict between the US and China. It began as a trade issue in 2018 but has since escalated and expanded to other areas as both countries take measures against each other. The fundamental reason for the conflict is the rising economic and technological competition between the two powers. The US accuses China of unfair trade practices and technology theft. Both countries have imposed tariffs and other restrictions on each other's goods and companies. The conflict could continue depending on the outcome of the US presidential election, but Peru should maintain balanced relations with both countries and not take sides.
United States is implementing a series of measures to try to cut off its dependence from China in certain areas, or to deny China access to certain technologies. In this sense, US is enlisting the help of some of its allies, as seen in the case of its effort to cut the flow of advanced semiconductors to China, as in the formation of the Chips 4 Alliance. Japan and Taiwan seem to be already on board in this idea. Netherlands, not a member of that alliance, is also participating. Still South Korea has not officially joined the Alliance.
What about Peru? Can Peru join in the effort to isolate China as US is planning to do? What, if any, can Peru do in that regard?
In this article a look at that issue is given. First, a brief review of Peru relations with China and US is given; second, in which areas could Peru cooperate with US effort is analyzed; and lastly, it is seen if really Peru can join that effort.
This document summarizes China-Latin America economic relations over the past few decades and considers possible scenarios for how the relationship may evolve. It notes that China has become a major trading partner and investor for many Latin American countries as its demand for commodities has driven growth. However, concerns include Latin America's dependence on raw material exports and potential impacts from a slowdown in China's economy. The document explores scenarios for sustained Chinese growth, a moderate slowdown, or a hard landing and associated effects on Latin America. It also discusses the diverse policy responses across the region to Chinese engagement.
Summary - The Road to Global ProsperityAlberto Rocha
- The document summarizes Michael Mandelbaum's book "The Road to Global Prosperity" which argues that international economic growth and cooperation are essential for global stability and prosperity.
- It discusses the economic rise of emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, India, and China (BRICs) but also notes their political and economic challenges. While the BRICs saw strong growth, they face issues like corruption, overreliance on commodities, poverty, and pollution.
- It also analyzes the 2008 global financial crisis, noting the US housing bubble and eurozone crisis exposed flaws in both systems and imbalances like high US debt and Chinese oversaving that remain issues. International cooperation on trade and addressing economic tensions
Threats of trade war between china and usaM S Siddiqui
Free trade has supported the growth of the post-World War II world economy. If an all-out trade war were to break out between major powers, it would rock the foundations for growth. The United States and China are responsible for not only maintaining international security but also stabilizing the world economy.
- America's renewed military aggression is a front for its financial war strategy, according to China's perspective. America uses the dollar's global role to artificially create economic booms and busts in other countries for its own benefit.
- China sees America as having transitioned to a "virtual economy" reliant on printing money and issuing debt. America draws dollars back in from overseas markets by raising risks in those markets and lowering risks in U.S. markets like Treasuries.
- China believes America caused the Latin American debt crisis of the 1970s and Asian Financial Crisis of the 1990s through these dollar pump-and-dump operations. China will coordinate with Russia to respond to continued American aggression.
The document discusses the trade war between the US and China. It provides background on how the conflict began with the US imposing tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods and China retaliating with tariffs on $110 billion of US goods. A key reason for tensions is the large US trade deficit with China. The trade war is negatively impacting both economies and global markets. Several rounds of escalating tariffs are outlined from 2018 to 2019.
Causes and possible consequences of the us china trade warHüseyin Tekler
When we look at the history of the known humanity, it appears that people started living in communities and that private property has emerged due to the progress of historical conditions. One of the consequences of this outcome is that world history is the scene of many wars and destruction. When it comes to war, it is armed struggles that take place between countries or political groups that come to mind first. Looking at this perspective, we see that the historical development process is also seen as the great majority of battles take place as physical battles, but it has become possible to say that, with great physical battles, technological and economic developments, sword-fighting and armed wars have begun to shift to economic and cultural wars. This new form of war has begun to take place on the stage of history on the basis of economic instruments. As an example of economic warfare, protectionism can be shown by countries in the direction of their own economic interests. It would not be wrong to say that the currency wars and the wars of trade that brought about by the protectionist policies of the countries, especially in the crisis period, will be the most important economic problem of our time. Throughout history, all wars have led to great destruction, and generally underdeveloped countries and poor countries have been affected by these destructions, and it is not wrong to say that the economic wars, as well as physical wars, will effect the least developed countries and the poor countries.
In this analysis, in the light of the historical background of protectionism, a trade war and the possible consequences of this war, which could be caused by the mutually elevated trade walls of the US and China, were examined.
The document discusses U.S.-China strategic relations and tensions over Taiwan. It summarizes a Pentagon report on China's growing military capabilities and China's protests against the report. It also discusses Vice President Biden's recent visit to China to boost relations and reassure China on economic issues. However, tensions remain over Taiwan, which the U.S. is legally obligated to aid defensively, despite China's stance that Taiwan is part of China.
The trade war between the United States and China began in 2018 and has escalated over time with both countries imposing tariffs on billions of dollars worth of each other's goods. The trade war has had mixed effects on both economies, hurting some industries but boosting others. It has also slowed global economic growth and disrupted international supply chains. While some short-term gains have been made by both sides, the long-term costs of a prolonged trade war could outweigh any benefits as it damages economic relationships and cooperation.
FROM THE NEW COLD WAR, FROM THE TRADE WAR, FROM THE FINANCIAL WAR AND FROM TH...Faga1939
This article aims to present the characteristics of modern warfare based on in-depth research on the march of the new Cold War between the United States and Russia, the trade war between the United States and China and its consequences, financial warfare as a weapon of modern warfare, cybernetic warfare as a modern warfare, the inevitability or not of the 3rd World War, the causes of violence and wars in the world to, in the end, present how to eliminate wars on the planet. The new Cold War results from the fact that the United States and NATO forces are expanding their presence on Russia's borders. The trade warfare was triggered by the United States against China to prevent this country from assuming the status of hegemonic economic power on the planet. Financial warfare has been unleashed by the United States, against its enemies such as Iran, Russia and China, with the aim of degrading the capabilities of its enemies and subjugating them with the adoption of economic and financial sanctions, while seeking advantage geopolitics in specific areas to bring the enemy country to a state of near collapse and paralysis, to financial catastrophe while advancing on other fronts. Cyber warfare is being unleashed by the United States, Russia, China, among other countries to attack computers and networks of enemy countries that affect resources necessary for war by studying the system deeply to discover its flaws and using these flaws to control this system or destroy it. The decline of the United States and the economic rise of China, which may assume the condition of the greatest world power in the mid-21st century, may trigger the 3rd World War in the face of the tension created between them. Parallel to the effort to educate all human beings with the culture of peace, it is necessary to put into practice a democratic governance of the world to prevent the recurrence of new world wars. This is the only means of survival for the human species and to stop the decay of humanity.
Goldman Sachs Article: The rise of geopolitical swing statesEnergy for One World
This document discusses the rise of "geopolitical swing states" - countries that have significant economic advantages and global influence but pursue their own agendas independent of the US and China. These countries fall into four categories: 1) those with advantages in global supply chains, 2) those suited for offshoring/nearshoring, 3) those with significant capital to invest globally, and 4) developed economies with leaders pursuing global visions. As great power competition increases between the US and China, these swing states will have more influence in shaping the global order to serve their own interests through multi-alignment strategies.
The document discusses several potential major economic and geopolitical themes for 2023. It suggests that the Federal Reserve and China may both pursue "soft pivots" away from the very tight monetary policies of 2022, gradually making their stances less restrictive. It also notes that 2023 may see relative political stability in major countries due to a lack of elections in G7 nations. Additionally, it posits that countries may further weaponize trade in the coming year by restricting certain exports or foreign assets. Finally, it explores how geopolitical tensions could contribute to the formation of two separate semiconductor manufacturing ecosystems centered around the US and China.
1) The author argues that Americans should care about Brexit because it could negatively impact peace and prosperity in Europe by fueling nationalist movements and potentially causing countries to leave the EU.
2) A breakdown of the EU single market through Brexit would make trade and travel across Europe more complicated and costly for both European countries and American companies doing business in Europe.
3) Brexit could weaken the UK's role as a gateway for US businesses to access the EU single market, negatively impacting the $558 billion US companies have invested in the UK.
The trade connection between the US and China has been quite possibly one of the most complex and significant across the globe. As the world's two biggest economies, their respective trade has critical ramifications for worldwide trade and international relations.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
How to Manage Reception Report in Odoo 17Celine George
A business may deal with both sales and purchases occasionally. They buy things from vendors and then sell them to their customers. Such dealings can be confusing at times. Because multiple clients may inquire about the same product at the same time, after purchasing those products, customers must be assigned to them. Odoo has a tool called Reception Report that can be used to complete this assignment. By enabling this, a reception report comes automatically after confirming a receipt, from which we can assign products to orders.
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
Philippine Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) CurriculumMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 𝟏)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐏𝐏 𝐂𝐮𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐮𝐥𝐮𝐦 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬:
- Understand the goals and objectives of the Edukasyong Pantahanan at Pangkabuhayan (EPP) curriculum, recognizing its importance in fostering practical life skills and values among students. Students will also be able to identify the key components and subjects covered, such as agriculture, home economics, industrial arts, and information and communication technology.
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐚𝐧 𝐄𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐮𝐫:
-Define entrepreneurship, distinguishing it from general business activities by emphasizing its focus on innovation, risk-taking, and value creation. Students will describe the characteristics and traits of successful entrepreneurs, including their roles and responsibilities, and discuss the broader economic and social impacts of entrepreneurial activities on both local and global scales.
Accounting for Restricted Grants When and How To Record Properly
Blinken visit to China
1. Blinken visit to China
The Secretary of State Antony Blinken will visit to China where he will talk
with his Chinese hosts about the many issues between United States and
China. In particular the talks happens in a particular year for both
countries and also for the whole world, in a context of low economic
growth.
In this article the most important issues between China and United States
will be considered and also the implications for the future of their relation
and for the whole world.
First, the visit will follow the meeting in person that President Xi Jinping
and Joe Biden held in Indonesia during the G20 summit last November. It
was their first meeting as leaders of their countries. At this meeting it was
announced that Secretary of State Blinken will visit China during the first
months of 2023.
The visit will happen in a moment when the world economy is in a difficult
situation. According to the IMF, there is a probability that in this year
2023, of the three engines of world economy, two will experiment zero or
negative growth. In Europe economic growth could be negative because,
among other things, the war in Ukraine increased price of energy and
food, and inflation is putting a pressure in the economy. Also, in United
States the fight against inflations has increased interest rates and this is
also putting a drag in economic growth with some projections pointing to
a zero growth in its economy. The only engine that could move the world
economy is China, but this country is also facing some challenges, among
them, the normalization after the dismantling of its zero covid-19 policy.
Second, of the several issues among both countries one of the most
difficult to resolve is the trade war that began during Trump Presidency in
2018, when U.S. imposed several rounds of tariffs in Chinese goods. China
reciprocated in kind, and the increase in tariffs in both sides are still there.
In January 2020 an agreement between both parts was reached to try to
address some of the complaints of United States against the big trade
deficit that it has with China, but then the COVID-19 pandemics occurred,
and that agreement and its compliance was put on hold. There are no
expectations that during Blinken visit to Beijing an agreement could be
reached in this issue. One reason for this is that with the campaign for
2. Presidential election in United States coming very soon, there is no mood
for a compromise in the White House because if it does it will be accused
by the Republican party of showing weakness against China. Besides this,
in the political establishment of United States, where there are many
differences between Republican and Democrats, the mood against China
is quite strong, and both parties agree on that.
Third, the trade war that United States began against China has been
transformed in a technological war. The fact is that, as United States has
put it, there is a competition in course between China and United States.
For United States, China in the only country that can challenge its
economic, technological, and military supremacy, and it has indicated that
will not allow that to happen.
In October last year United States took more measures to avoid China
access to high technology in semiconductors. The aim is to exclude China
from the global supply chains producing semiconductors. For this United
States is also enlisting the support of South Korea, Japan, the Netherlands,
and Taiwan. And in this regard the technological war/competition will
continue.
Fourth, regarding the issue of Taiwan, where the visit by high-ranking
officers of the United States government prompted China response and
raised alarms about even a possible military confrontations between both
superpowers, the stances of both countries will be reaffirmed. China
regards Taiwan as one of its core issues and is against foreign intervention
in its internal affairs but United States will reaffirm its “one China policy”.
Fifth, another issue is what the United States see as the growing presence
of China in the South China Sea, and the possibility of dangerous
encounters of their navy and warplanes in that area. As United States
execute what it calls “freedom of navigations operation” in islands or
atolls that China regards as its territory, the possibility of an unintended
military clash can happen. Both countries will surely establish mechanisms
to try to avoid that, but the situation could/will remain tense.
Sixth, another issue that United States will raise to China is the war in
Ukraine. China and Russia have what they called last February “no limits
partnership”, and surely Russia was expecting China’s support in its
invasion of Ukraine. China have not done that and surely will not do. It
3. should not be in China interest to give support, either military or economic
to Russia, among other reasons, because economic sanctions will befall on
China.
United States will look for more assurances on the part of China in that
position but also will ask China to exert its influence in Russia to find a
prompt solution to the war in Ukraine. At least China and United States
both agreed in the G20 summit that the use or threat of use of nuclear
weapons in Ukraine (as Putin mentioned) is unacceptable.
Seventh, the issue of North Korea and its growing sophistication regarding
the launching of its ballistic missiles is also a concern for the United States.
Probably China is the only country that can exert some influence in North
Korea, as it is the only country with which can trade and most imported
goods available in North Korea come through China.
United States will pressure China to exerts its influence on North Korea.
United States will present the case as something in China own interests, as
the growing sophistication of North Korea menace is forcing countries like
South Korea and Japan to increase their military budgets and modernize
its military. A growing military race is happening in East Asia, and more
sophisticated weapons will be introduced, and North Korea attitude is one
of the reasons. Also United States is increasing its military presence there
for that reason. And surely none of this is in China interest.
Another issue related to this is what it is seen a growing military
cooperation between China and Russia in East Asia. Surely this issue will
also be raised by United States during Blinken visit.
Eight, other issues where both United States and China could collaborate
or should collaborate as the rest of the world sees it, is in themes like
global climate change, financial, health, and debt relief issues. These are
global issues and in particular developing countries in particular expect
that the two biggest economies in the world could agree on some of those
issues. Without United States and China working together, no meaningful
solutions could be found for those issues.
Anyway, perhaps there is some room to be optimist that, even if United
States and China have, as we have seen, several differences, some
agreement will be reached during Blinken visit. There are two or three
reasons for this. First, this year is complicated for United States because of
4. the Presidential campaign that will be in course. Biden would like to have
some agreements with China to allow him to show some results (even if
the trade war and technological competition/war will continue). Also for
China, 2023 is a complicated year and will look for its economy to move
forward and recover, especially from its low growth of 2022. Both
countries probably have no interest in increasing its rivalry, at least not in
the short time, not this year (for the reasons given).
Second, something that perhaps could make easier negotiations between
United States and China is that the Foreign Minister of China is now Qin
Gang, who was until recently China Ambassador in the United States.
Besides that, he is known as a trusted adviser of President Xi Jinping. So,
he probably developed some contacts in United States and, also have the
ear of Xi.
Third, it is said that because 2023 is the year where the APEC summit
meeting will be celebrated in United States, both superpowers would like
to have a good working relationship. Probably another bilateral summit
between Xi and Biden will happen at that time.
In conclusion, Blinken visit to China could see some progress in relations
between China and United States. Differences are there and will not go,
the competition will go on, but they will look for to stabilize the
relationship, and to manage competition.
Lastly, there is the question of the United States ever increasing
government debt. As of October 2022, the national debt of the United
States is 31 trillion dollars, that represent around 124% of its GDP. The
United States national debt is the largest in the world but considering its
GDP size is not as big as Japan, in which is debt is around 250% of its GDP,
or Greece with around 205%, or even Italy worth 159% of its GDP.
Most of United States national debt is owned to its nationals so its debt
owed to foreigners is around 22% of the total1
. Japan is the biggest holder
of United States public debt with around 1.2 trillion dollars, second is
China with a little less than 1 trillion dollars.
The largest debt of the United Sates is a problem, but the country is in a
different position that many others indebted countries. For other
countries trying to finance public debt just printing money is a big problem
1
Investopedia: U.S. Debt https://www.investopedia.com/updates/usa-national-debt/
5. because this will generate inflation. In the case of United States, as the
dollar is a global currency and is demanded by countries, companies, and
individuals all over the world, always there will be a demand for its
currency. Also, some foreign governments will be willing to buy United
States debt, for example Japan and China, because this keep the value of
the dollar high, relative to their own currencies, so they can sell their
goods at competitive prices.
If the dollar continues as (the unique) global currency, demand for dollar
denominated debt of United States will not lose attraction. In this sense,
United States government debt is not as problematic as other countries.
Besides this, as the United States economy keeps growing, the
government will have capacity to pay the debt (and to incur in more debt)
is expected. China will continue keeping United States treasuries (it is
estimated that one third of China foreign reserves are held that way) but
is trying to find ways to diversifies its reserves.
January 9, 2023