Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with James Hulse, Director of the Forest Footp...Blake Morgan
Blake Lapthorn were pleased to welcome James Hulse, Director of the Forest Footprint Disclosure project, to its green breakfast on 7 December at Oxford.
Blake Lapthorn's student complaints and disciplinary issues seminarBlake Morgan
Blake Lapthorn's Professional Regulatory team held a seminar on student complaints and disciplinary issues with Baroness Ruth Deech on Thursday 20 May 2010.
Revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services An E.docxWilheminaRossi174
Revised Statements
on Standards
for Tax Services
An Exposure Draft and
Invitation to Comment
Revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services: An Exposure Draft and Invitation to Comment | 1
Contents
2 Explanatory memorandum
2 Introduction
3 SSTS revision timeline
4 Description of combined document
4 Request for comments
4 Comment period
5 Part 1: Exposure draft of proposed revisions to the SSTSs
6 Background
7 Explanation of proposed revisions to the SSTSs
23 Effective date
23 Exposure draft
40 Questions for respondents
41 Part 2: Invitation to Comment
42 Introduction
42 Issue description
42 State of quality management in tax
43 Implementation
44 Questions for respondents
45 Contributors
Revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services: An Exposure Draft and Invitation to Comment | 2
Explanatory memorandum
Introduction
Statements on Standards for Tax Services (SSTSs) are
issued by the AICPA Tax Executive Committee (TEC),
the senior technical body of the AICPA designated to
promulgate standards of tax practice. The General
Standards Rule (AICPA, Professional Standards, ET
secs. 1.300.001 and 2.300.001) and the Compliance
With Standards Rule (AICPA, Professional Standards,
ET secs. 1.310.001 and 2.310.001) of the AICPA Code
of Professional Conduct require compliance with these
standards. Many state boards of accountancy also
incorporate the SSTSs as part of their professional rules
of conduct for CPAs.
The purpose of this combined document is to
solicit feedback, respectively, on:
1. Part 1: Exposure Draft (ED) of proposed
revisions to the AICPA's SSTSs that, if
adopted, will become effective on
Jan. 1, 2024, and
2. Part 2: Invitation to Comment (ITC) on
potential approaches to effectively
introduce quality management in tax.
In September of 2018, the AICPA TEC approved
formation of the SSTS Revision Task Force to update
the SSTSs to (1) better reflect the issues and needs
of members and the tax practices of today and in the
future and (2) ensure the highest ethical standards for
members who support the public’s view that CPAs are
the premier providers of tax services.
As part of those efforts, the task force:
• Developed a new structure to organize the SSTSs
by type of tax work performed,
• Updated the existing standards to better reflect
the current and possible future state of the tax
profession and
• Drafted three new standards surrounding data
protection, reliance on tools and the representation
of clients before taxing authorities.
In addition, the task force explored items that will
require additional research and investigation and held
extensive discussions among its members and multiple
committees to explore what, if any, revisions to the
SSTSs should be made to address issues of quality
management in tax.
Stakeholders are invited to comment on all matters
in this ED and ITC. Specific questions related to the
ED and ITC are included at t.
OECD Review of Financial reporting in Ireland - Breda Rafter, IrelandOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Breda Rafter, Ireland, at the 19th OECD Senior Financial Management and Reporting Officials Symposium held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 4-5 March 2019
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with James Hulse, Director of the Forest Footp...Blake Morgan
Blake Lapthorn were pleased to welcome James Hulse, Director of the Forest Footprint Disclosure project, to its green breakfast on 7 December at Oxford.
Blake Lapthorn's student complaints and disciplinary issues seminarBlake Morgan
Blake Lapthorn's Professional Regulatory team held a seminar on student complaints and disciplinary issues with Baroness Ruth Deech on Thursday 20 May 2010.
Revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services An E.docxWilheminaRossi174
Revised Statements
on Standards
for Tax Services
An Exposure Draft and
Invitation to Comment
Revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services: An Exposure Draft and Invitation to Comment | 1
Contents
2 Explanatory memorandum
2 Introduction
3 SSTS revision timeline
4 Description of combined document
4 Request for comments
4 Comment period
5 Part 1: Exposure draft of proposed revisions to the SSTSs
6 Background
7 Explanation of proposed revisions to the SSTSs
23 Effective date
23 Exposure draft
40 Questions for respondents
41 Part 2: Invitation to Comment
42 Introduction
42 Issue description
42 State of quality management in tax
43 Implementation
44 Questions for respondents
45 Contributors
Revised Statements on Standards for Tax Services: An Exposure Draft and Invitation to Comment | 2
Explanatory memorandum
Introduction
Statements on Standards for Tax Services (SSTSs) are
issued by the AICPA Tax Executive Committee (TEC),
the senior technical body of the AICPA designated to
promulgate standards of tax practice. The General
Standards Rule (AICPA, Professional Standards, ET
secs. 1.300.001 and 2.300.001) and the Compliance
With Standards Rule (AICPA, Professional Standards,
ET secs. 1.310.001 and 2.310.001) of the AICPA Code
of Professional Conduct require compliance with these
standards. Many state boards of accountancy also
incorporate the SSTSs as part of their professional rules
of conduct for CPAs.
The purpose of this combined document is to
solicit feedback, respectively, on:
1. Part 1: Exposure Draft (ED) of proposed
revisions to the AICPA's SSTSs that, if
adopted, will become effective on
Jan. 1, 2024, and
2. Part 2: Invitation to Comment (ITC) on
potential approaches to effectively
introduce quality management in tax.
In September of 2018, the AICPA TEC approved
formation of the SSTS Revision Task Force to update
the SSTSs to (1) better reflect the issues and needs
of members and the tax practices of today and in the
future and (2) ensure the highest ethical standards for
members who support the public’s view that CPAs are
the premier providers of tax services.
As part of those efforts, the task force:
• Developed a new structure to organize the SSTSs
by type of tax work performed,
• Updated the existing standards to better reflect
the current and possible future state of the tax
profession and
• Drafted three new standards surrounding data
protection, reliance on tools and the representation
of clients before taxing authorities.
In addition, the task force explored items that will
require additional research and investigation and held
extensive discussions among its members and multiple
committees to explore what, if any, revisions to the
SSTSs should be made to address issues of quality
management in tax.
Stakeholders are invited to comment on all matters
in this ED and ITC. Specific questions related to the
ED and ITC are included at t.
OECD Review of Financial reporting in Ireland - Breda Rafter, IrelandOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Breda Rafter, Ireland, at the 19th OECD Senior Financial Management and Reporting Officials Symposium held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 4-5 March 2019
Presentation made by Ian Carruthers, IPSASB, at the 16th Annual OECD Accruals Symposium held at the OECD Conference Centre, Paris, on 21-22 March 2016.
sbo-accruals-march-2016
Budgetary governance reforms in Timor-Leste - Brigida Soares, Timor-LesteOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Brigida Soares, Timor-Leste, at the 12th Annual Meeting of OECD-Asian Senior Budget Officials held in Bangkok, Thailand, on 15-16 December 2016
The future of government fiscal reporting - Vikki Lewis, United KingdomOECD Governance
This presentation was made by Vikki Lewis, United Kingdom, at the 17th Annual Meeting of OECD Senior Management Officials held at the OECD, Paris, on 2-3 March 2017
The Walter Lilly case - some harsh lessons learnt - construction update semin...Blake Morgan
Richard Wade from Blake Morgan talked about The Walter Lilly case and the lessons learnt at Blake Morgan and Rund's Construction update seminar on 5 November 2014 in Southampton.
Blake Lapthorn's London Pensions conference 19 March 2014Blake Morgan
On Wednesday 19 March 2014, Blake Lapthorn's Pensions team hosted its London Pensions conference - 'The State of Pensions'. The team were joined by Ed Tomlinson of SEI and Kevin Wesbroom of Aon Hewitt. Speakers brought delegates up to date with recent and future developments and demonstrated ways in which some of the current and future challenges can be met.
Blake Lapthorn's In-House Lawyer and Decision Makers' forum - 'Health & Safet...Blake Morgan
On Tuesday 25 February 2014, Blake Lapthorn's commercial litigation team hosted an In-House Lawyer and Decision Maker's forum in Southampton. Our speakers, John Mitchell and Nicola Hutchins, discussed the changing landscape of Health & Safety law.
Blake Lapthorn's green breakfast with the Environment BankBlake Morgan
On Wednesday 4 December, Blake Lapthorn's climate change team hosted a green brekfast ith Dr. Tom Tew, Chief Executive of the Environment Bank. Tom talked about the role of bio-diversity off setting.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with BRE globalBlake Morgan
On Tuesday 3 December, Blake Lapthorn's climate change team hosted a green breakfast seminar. Guest speaker Chris Cousins of BRE Global, talked about sustainable building for a Green future.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with Dr. Barbara Hammond of the Osney Lock Hyd...Blake Morgan
On Wednesday 20 November 2013, Blake Lapthorn's climate change team hosted a green breakfast seminar. Guest Speaker Dr. Barbara Hammond, talked about the high profile and long awaited, first community owned micro hydro scheme on the upper Thames.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with The Green Blue - 19 November 2013Blake Morgan
On Wednesday 19 November 2013, Blake Lapthorn's Climate Change team hosted a green breakfast seminar titled 'Influencing change in the UK leisure marine sector', with guest speakers Jane Swan and Dan Reading of The Green Blue.
Blake Lapthorn's green breakfast with guest speaker Keeran Jugdoyal, Faithful...Blake Morgan
On Wednesday 13 November 2013, Blake Lapthorn's climate change team hosted a green breakfast seminar. Guest speaker Keeran Jugdoyal, Mechanical Engineering Manager at Faithful+Gould, talked about the lessons his company has learnt about the end use of sustainable buildings.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with URS GlobalBlake Morgan
On Wednesday 6 November 2013, Blake Lapthorn's climate change hosted a green breakfast seminar. Guest Speaker Robert Spencer, Business Line Director - Sustainability at URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Ltd, talked about integrating eco system services and Natural Capital considerations into business planning and strategy.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with Seacourt Printing Ltd - 16 October 2013Blake Morgan
On Wednesday 16 October 2013, Blake Lapthorn's Climate Change team hosted a green breakfast seminar. Guest speaker Gareth Dinnage, Managing Director of Seacourt Printing, talked about his companies move from being a standard 'dirty' printer to the first closed loop, Zero Waste, printing company in the world.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with Rapanui - 18 September 2013Blake Morgan
On wednesday 18 September 2013 Blake Lapthorn's Climate Change team hosted a green breakfast seminar titled Eco-fashion for the green consumer, with guest speaker Mart Drake-Knight of Rapanui.
Blake Lapthorn's In-House Lawyer and Decision Makers' forumBlake Morgan
Blake Lapthorn's Litigation Dispute Resolution and Employment teams joined up to present a forum on social media and confidentiality on 17 September 2013, at Blake Lapthorn's Oxford office.
Blake Lapthorn Academies conference, Southampton - 18 June 2013Blake Morgan
Blake Lapthorn's Education team hosted a summer conference for Academy schools and those looking to convert to academy status. The conference provided guidance and advice with the guest speaker being Zenna Atkins, former head of Ofsted.
Blake Lapthorn green breakfast with Mike Putnam, Skanska UK - 8 May 2013Blake Morgan
On Wednesday 8 May 2013 Blake Lapthorn's Climate Change team hosted a green breakfast seminar. Guest speaker Mike Putnam, President and CEO of Skanska UK, talked about his companies 'Journey to Deep Green'.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
2. The ongoing saga!
• Where CRC started
• Changes
– with the new Government – CSR October ’10
– with the consultation - November ’10
– with the simplification – February’ 11
• CRC – where next?
3. Its start - background
• 7 phases – 2010 -2043
• April 2010 - First phase and beyond
– Information disclosure or full participation (2008 HHM)
– Measure and comply from April 2010
– March 31st 2011 – report emissions & compile
evidence pack for July 2011 submission
– October 2011 – league table – recycling allowances
– Phase 2 and beyond – cap & trade
4. Its start – the administration
• Evidence pack – covering:
• structural records;
• data collation methods & data collected;
• recording of utility bills, with special events records;
• liaison with utility companies over invoice queries;
• and resolution and CRC allowances transactions
• CRC allowances – forecasting requirements and
procurement
• Nominated individuals - including Director responsible
5. Its start – costs & benefits
• Cash flow - impact reduced to six months
• Allowances – phase 1 fixed price then auction (phase 2
and beyond) - recycling of allowances
• Fines - failure to comply and poor/inadequate recording –
audit by Environment Agency (20% of organisations p.a.)
• Potential benefits – energy efficiency savings
• Reputation – potentially the major issue (costs marginal)
6. Its start
• Intended to be neutral for government revenue generation
• CRC allowance pot is recycled, based on performance
• However, recycling rate increases – from +/-10% for year
1 to +/-50% for year 5 – complex calculations
• Allowances purchased in advance – any deficit required
purchasing via the safety valve or the secondary market –
at market prices, and plus VAT
7. Its start – the performance league table
• Ranking all participants – not by sector – plus 4 questions
• Participants – actual 2,770 participants and 11,475
information declarers – anticipated 5k & 20k in total
• Phase one league table includes early action metric
measures (CT Standard or equivalent and Smart Meters)
– plus absolute metrics plus growth metrics (at the end)
• Subsequent phases – only absolute & growth metrics
8. Changes – October ’10– the facts
• Postponement – first sale of allowances to take place for 2011/2012
• Timing – allowances purchase after year end – for year 1!!!!
• Recycling becomes a tax – revenue from allowance sales will not be
recycled to participants, but “used to support public finances”
• Performance league table – retained as the main reputation driver –
timings, metrics & 4 quesitons remain as previously
• The CRC administrators – recognise concern over CRC complexity
and plan a consultation on simplification
9. Changes – October ’10 – perceived
implications - 1
• The cost of scrapping recycling – a retailer thought for the first few
years they would receive recycling payments – now a £4m cost p.a.
• Postponement – view was organisations could pull back on their
CRC initiatives, including data collation – but the evidence pack and
CRC reporting remain for 2010/11
• In the loop? – Perhaps not - Environment Agency said they were
“working to understand the implications of the changes”
• Early actions – without financial incentives linked to the league table,
the linked benefits of early action metrics disappear
10. Changes – October ’10 – perceived
implications - 2
• Senior management attention – because of tax
generation
• Easier administration & accounting – “no forecasting”
• Investment appraisal for energy saving initiatives – tax
easier to measure
• Landlord & tenants – Could tax be easier to pass on??
11. Changes with the consultation – the facts
• Less change than anticipated!!
• 5 proposed changes consulted upon
– Extend phase 1 and delay phase 2
– Remove the requirement for information disclosures
– Amend the CRC’s landlord provision re Northern
Ireland departments
– Update the division of administrators’ responsibilities
– Correct reference errors and technical fixes
• Changes implemented 1st April 2011
12. Changes with the consultation – the
proposals - all AGREED - 1
• Extend phase 1 and delay phase 2 – to give
further time for government consultation (2011
was phase 2 footprint year).
• Now phase 1 ends in 2014 & phase 2 starts then.
• Footprint years aligned to the first year of each
phase. Phase 2, footprint year is 2013/2014 – the
first annual reporting year – same as for phase 1.
13. Revised phasing
Phase 1 Qualification year
Annual Report
and footprint
report
Annual Report
R S S S
R – registration
between 1st April
Phase 2
& 30th September
R S S S S S
S – surrender of
allowances for
Phase 3 this year
R S S S S S
200 201 2011 201 201 201 201 2016 201 201 201 202 202 202 202
8 0-11 -12 2-13 3-14 4-15 5-16 -17 7-18 8-19 9-20 0-21 1-22 2-23 3-24
14. Changes with the consultation – the
proposals - all AGREED - 2
• Remove the requirement for information
disclosures – “Government considers the primary
value from the information disclosure process to
have been realised in phase 1 registration period”
• Remove requirement for information disclosure
after end of the phase one registration period.
• Some views suggested this diluted impact of
CRC on non participants.
15. Changes with the consultation – the
proposals - all AGREED - 3
• Amend the CRC’s landlord provision re Northern
Ireland departments – Northern Ireland
departments occupy their accommodation with a
single department being considered responsible,
as ‘landlord’.
• Update administrators’ division of responsibilities
– ensure relevant administrators are responsible
for inspection of records.
• Correct reference errors/technical fixes.
16. Changes with the consultation – the
implications
• Mostly administrative
• Information disclosure – sensible administrative
burden reduction but how will compliance be
monitored for those close to the threshold?
17. Changes with the simplification – the
background
• Simplification considered in the light of other
energy policy developments and CRC complexity
• Any changes would be in place before second
phase registration (April 2013).
18. Changes with the simplification – the issue
areas - 1
• Private sector organisational rules
• Review of the CRC supply rules
• Reducing the overlap between schemes (CRC,
CCA, EU ETS)
• Timing of allowances sales from 2012 onwards
19. Changes with the simplification –
discussion areas - 1
• Private sector organisational rules – issues about
highest parent (especially JVs); overseas
parents; group mgt structures; SGUs.
• Options for consideration:
– retain current rules but allow disaggregation;
– bottom up approach for qualification (drop highest
parent rule but possibly reduce qualification criteria);
– group structure based on accounting rules;
– UK top parent to replace overseas top parent;
– review designated changes
20. Changes with the simplification –
discussion areas - 2
• Review of the CRC supply rules –who is
responsible for energy supply?
• Significant options for consideration (of 8 in all):
– Counterpart to energy contract – without meter;
– Exclude other fuels – may change 90% rule
– Emissions responsibility based on consumption rather
than supply (reverses the treatment of landlord)
21. Changes with the simplification –
discussion areas - 3
• Reducing the overlap between schemes (CRC,
CCA, EU ETS) – issues about reporting under
CRC – plus GHG reporting
• Significant options for consideration:
– Exclude EU ETS or CCA participants from CRC;
– Assess qualification on basis of non “CCA” supplies
– Merge CRC with other policies, including GHG
reporting to create mandatory GHG reporting
22. Changes with the simplification –
discussion areas - 4
• Timing of allowances sales from 2012 onwards –
issues about forecasting/planning; potential
double purchase; and legal vires to facilitate
trading market
• Options for consideration:
– Phase 1 – 2012 onwards – to be decided
– Transition – 2 fixed price sales in 2013/2014 or
multiples sales during the year
– Phase 2 – Auction or retain phase 1 with variants
23. Changes with the simplification – a view of
the likely implications
• Better integration of CRC with other policy
initiatives - mandatory GHG reporting?
• Forecasting and planning energy and emissions
regains its emphasis for phase 2
• Auction of allowances likely for phase 2
• Organisational rules simplified – landlord/tenant?
• Fuels covered simplified
• BUT – process will be discussion (March 2011),
consultation on proposals, then legislation
24. Changes with the simplification – some
conclusions
• CRC will not go away – Gov’n commitment to
80% emissions reduction by 2050 & EU changes
• CRC may be simplified, but subsequent phases
will be broadly in line with original intention
• Energy/emissions management is essential for
effective phase 2 management – Manage,
Improve, Monitor is the focus for management
• CRC likely to stay as tax, rather than recycling
• PLUS ÇA CHANGE!
25. Thank you – and questions
thoskins@thevirtuouscircle.co.uk