Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - RubricCollapse Al

Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - Rubric
Collapse All Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal -
RubricCollapse All
Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor
10 points
Criteria Description
Revisions Incorporated as Directed by Instructor
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
All revisions are incorporated. The revision greatly improves
the accuracy and clarity of the project.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
The key aspects were revised. The revision generally improves
the accuracy and clarity of the project.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Most key aspects were revised. Some aspects are still vague or
contain minor inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.5 points
Revision is incomplete. Many aspects are still incomplete,
inaccurate, or unclear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Revision is omitted.
Background
10 points
Background
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Background of clinical problem are clearly and logically
presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.

4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Background of clinical problem are presented. Minor aspects
are unclear or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Background of clinical problem are summarized. There are
minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information
is needed.
7.5 points
Background of clinical problem is incomplete.
0 points
Background of clinical problem omitted.
Clinical Problem Statement
10 points
Clinical Problem Statement
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Clinical problem statement is clearly and logically presented.
Relevant support and rationale are evident.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Clinical problem statement is presented. Minor aspects are
unclear or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Clinical problem statement is summarized. There are minor
omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or information is
needed.
7.5 points
Clinical problem statement is incomplete.

0 points
Clinical problem statement omitted.
Purpose of Change Proposal
10 points
Purpose of Change Proposal
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Purpose of the change proposal in relation to providing patient
care in the changing health care system is logically presented.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
care in the changing health care system is presented. Minor
aspects are unclear or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
care in the changing health care system is summarized. There
are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or
information is needed.
7.5 points
care in the changing health care system is incomplete.
0 points
care in the changing health care system is omitted.
PICOT Question
10 points
PICOT Question
5. 5: Excellent
10 points

Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant
support and rationale are evident.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or
require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor
needed.
7.5 points
Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete.
0 points
PICOT questions is omitted.
Literature Search
10 points
Literature Search
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Topic and criteria are clearly and logically presented. Relevant
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Topic and criteria are presented. Minor aspects are unclear or
require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Topic and most criteria are presented. There are minor
needed.
7.5 points

Topic is presented but criteria is incomplete.
0 points
Literature search strategy employed omitted.
Evaluation of Literature
10 points
Evaluation of Literature
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Evaluation of literature is clearly and logically presented.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Evaluation of literature is presented. Minor aspects are unclear
or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Evaluation of literature is summarized. There are minor
needed.
7.5 points
Evaluation of literature is incomplete.
0 points
Evaluation of literature omitted.
Change or Nursing Theory
10 points
Change or Nursing Theory
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Change or nursing theory is logically presented. Relevant
4. 4: Good

8.9 points
Change or nursing theory is presented. Minor aspects are
unclear or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Change or nursing theory is summarized. There are minor
needed.
7.5 points
Change or nursing theory is incomplete.
0 points
Change or nursing theory omitted.
Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures
20 points
Implementation Plan and Outcome Measures
5. 5: Excellent
20 points
Implementation plan and outcome measures are clearly and
logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are evident.
4. 4: Good
17.8 points
Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented.
Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.8 points
Implementation plan and outcome measures are summarized.
There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some support or
information is needed.
15 points
Implementation plan and outcome measures are presented is
incomplete.

0 points
Implementation plan and outcome measures are omitted.
Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Intervention Plan
20 points
Use of Evidence-Based Practice in Intervention Plan
5. 5: Excellent
20 points
Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is clearly
and logically presented. Relevant support and rationale are
evident.
4. 4: Good
17.8 points
Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan is
presented. Minor aspects are unclear or require support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.8 points
summarized. There are minor omissions or inaccuracies. Some
support or information is needed.
15 points
incomplete.
0 points
Use of evidence-based practice in intervention plan omitted.
Plan for Evaluating Proposed Nursing Intervention
20 points
Plan for Evaluating Proposed Nursing Intervention
5. 5: Excellent
20 points
Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is clearly and
4. 4: Good

17.8 points
Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is presented.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.8 points
Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is
15 points
Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention is incomplete.
0 points
Plan for evaluating proposed nursing intervention omitted.
Potential Barriers and Plan to Overcome Barriers
20 points
Potential Barriers and Plan to Overcome Barriers
5. 5: Excellent
20 points
Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are clearly and
4. 4: Good
17.8 points
Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are presented.
3. 3: Satisfactory
15.8 points
Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are
15 points
Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are incomplete.
0 points

Potential barriers and plan to overcome barriers are omitted.
Thesis Development and Purpose
10 points
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper.
Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
7.5 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
10 points
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim
in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of

argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.9 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
7.5 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
10 points
Criteria 3Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation,
grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
10 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
4. 4: Good
8.9 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory

7.9 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.
7.5 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
4 points
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and
assignment)
5. 5: Excellent
4 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
3.56 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
3.16 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
3 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken;
lack of control with formatting is apparent.

0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is
rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
6 points
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references,
bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
5.34 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
4.74 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style,
although some formatting errors may be present.
4.5 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting
errors.
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Student Learning Outcome:
● Student will select their topic for the Advocacy Speech . (See
Page 3)

Background:
● The topic for the Advocacy Speech will focus on the work of
an
organization that advocates on behalf of social justice issues.
○ Advocacy will be defined as follows for this assignment:
■ the act or process of supporting a cause or issue on
behalf of someone or something that is currently not
able to do so for themselves.
● The best resource for your speech will be the website for the
organization
you are speaking about.
● Before starting this quiz, students will need to identify the
organization and
be familiar with the organization's website. You will need
information from
the organizations website to complete the quiz.
● This quiz should be completed before 11.59 pm, Sunday May
8th, in order
to receive feedback prior to class on Tuesday May 10th.
● Students have struggled with one important element of the
Advocacy
Speech and that issue is addressed in Question 3 of the Q#3.
○ Q#3, Question 3: "Please provide a narrative from someone
whom your organization has helped through their action
regarding the social issue."
● Student's must identify the narrative of someone who has
been helped by

the advocacy group and the work the group sponsors or service
it
provides.
○ An effective narrative provides; context, meaning, and
interest
to listener and speaker.
○ Therefore, the narrative you provide should do the following:
■ Help you understand how the individual is being hurt
by the social issue;
■ Demonstrate the effectiveness of the advocacy
group's work to address the social issue.
■ You need to find the the narrative interesting.
○ Often times, students will provide information what the group
does, and while that may address the first two tenants of a
narrative, that information often fails at the last because it isn't
that interesting.
○ The narrative will provide the most compelling part of your
speech and therefore the success of your speech depends
upon the effectiveness of the narrative.
https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1472060/assignments/61764
14
Instructions:
● You should have selected the organization you will use for
the Advocacy
Speech.
● You will need to be familiar with the organizations website

and be able to
find the following on the website:
○ Mission statement: This will be one of the questions on this
quiz but you won't necessarily use this during the speech. This
question is meant as a way for you to gauge how closely you
align with the work of the organization. You will often find the
mission statement in the "about us" page of the website.
○ Narrative: You will use this as a significant portion of your
speech and the narrative must tell the audience a story. A story
has a beginning, a middle, and an end. There should be a
climax during the story that will be compelling to the audience.
The narrative can be found in many different parts of the
website, here are few:
■ "About Us" page
■ "History" of the organization on the "About Us" page.
■ "Testimonial" page
■ "News Articles" or "In the News" page. This will be a
variety of published articles written about the
organization.
Examples of Responses using The Delancy Street
Foundation:
1. Organization's webpage: Delancy Street Foundation
2. (Links to an external site.)
3.
4. Organization's mission statement: Delancy Street: What We
Believe
6.
7. Narrative from the organization: Delancy Street: Our Story

9. (remember you must provide the written narrative not just the
link. I gave
the link so you could see where I found it within the website.)
http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/
http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/
http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/wwb.php
http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/wwb.php
http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/ourstory.php
http://www.delanceystreetfoundation.org/ourstory.php
Advocacy Speech
Purpose of Assignment:
This is the course culminating assignment. Students will
demonstrate how to apply
skills and knowledge they have acquired during the semester as
they persuade an
audience to support the efforts of an advocacy group.
Course Learning Outcomes:
CLO1: Identify and assess socially significant and intellectual
topics, then compose
and deliver extemporaneous oral presentations (using note cards
or key-word
outlines) on those topics.
CLO2: Engage in critical and analytical listening.
CLO3: Analyze audiences, adapt oral presentations to diverse
audiences and use
that information to accomplish the purpose of the speech.

CLO4: Assume the ethical responsibilities of the public speaker,
including basic
understanding of the economic, legal and social issues
surrounding the access and
use of information.
CLO5: Students will be able to (1) engage in substantive
discussions about diversity
and (2) develop written communication skills.
This assignment will demonstrate the students mastery of the
Course
Learning Objectives as they successfully complete these
elements of the
assignment:
1. The topic will allow the student to demonstrate effective
critical thinking
skills as they select an organization that engages in work related
to issues
of social justice. [CLO1,4 & 5]
2. Speech Construction & Delivery:
1. The use of Monroe’s Motivated Sequence (MMS); will
demonstrate the students ability to engage in socially significant
topics related to social justice. MMS will also help the student
demonstrate how they have craft their speech with a specific
audience in mind. MMS requires the student to assess
information as they construct augments that are logically sound.
[CLO1,3,4 & 5]
2. Speech Outline: Demonstrates the students ability to organize
the information in an interesting and compelling manner in
order

to motivate an audience to engage causes related to social
justice. [CLO1 & 4]
3. Sources: Effective use of source material will demonstrate
the
students ability to research and select material that will most
effectively support their positions in an equitable manner.
[CLO4]
3. Speech Construction: The Written Portion of the assignment
demonstrates the students ability to construct arguments based
on sound
logic, the ability to select the best supporting information, and
demonstrate
effective written communication skills. [CLO1,4 & 5]
4. Speech Delivery: Provides the students opportunities to
demonstrate
active listening skills as they respond to audience feedback as
they deliver
the speech. [CLO2]
Assignment Requirements:
Written Portion:
1. The topic should be about an advocacy group or organization
focusing on
the communities and individuals who benefit from the groups or
organizations work and why you are advocating for them.
2. The speech should be 4-5 minutes in length and should be
constructed

using language should be persuasive and informational. Time
does not
allow for speeches over 5.30 minutes, so speakers who exceed
the time
will be asked to come to a stopping point quickly.
3. Speech format must include Monroe's Motivated Sequence
(MMS) used
effectively within the speech outline.
1. MMS steps must include the following; attention (the
attention
must be a narrative), need, satisfaction, visualization, and
action. These steps will be worked into the standard speech
outline format. (This is a modification of the format used to
write
your debate brief earlier this semester).
1. Introduction: Should include the recommended
Attention getter, the thesis for the speech, and a
preview of the rest of the speech.
2. 3 Main Points: Information is divided into three
distinguishable sections which are separated by
distinctive transitional statements.
3. Conclusion: Should include the review of the speech,
restatement of the thesis; and return to the attention
getter.
4. You should demonstrate something tangible that you have
done on behalf
of the advocacy group. This would be an investment of time,
energy, or

person.
5. You must cite all sources used as you research and present
your speech.
There is not a required number of sources but the sources you
choose to use must represent a diverse viewpoint and be
properly
cited during spoken and written usages following a consistent
format.
6. A typed full sentence outline (this means outline, do not
submit the
assignment as an essay) of the speech will be submitted to
Canvas
prior to the final exam date and time for each section. I expect
that some
differences will occur but the fundamentals of the performance
and the
outline should be consistent.
Oral Presentation
1. Your presentation skills should draw upon extemporaneous
speaking
skills, informative speaking techniques, and effective verbal and
non-verbal communication skills specifically suited for online
delivery.
Total Points for the Assignment will be weighted as follows
(please note both
the written and performance portion must be completed jointly,
no partial
credit will be granted):
Written Portion:

● Speech format is followed: Monroe's
Motivated Sequence (MMS) is used
effectively within the speech outline. MMS
steps must include the following; attention
(the attention must be a narrative), need,
satisfaction, visualization, and action.
15 Pts.
● Sources cited appropriately in all areas:
oral citations or signal phrases, intext
citations for written text, and References
page included.
10 Pts.
● Sound logic and reasoning used
throughout the speech.
10 Pts.
● Writing is free of grammatical and spelling
errors and following all other rules for
academic writing.
5 Pts.
Total Points for Written
Portion: 60 Pts.
Performance Portion:
● Verbal communication skills used
effectively to deliver the speech.

5 Pts.
● Non-verbal communication skills used
effectively to deliver the speech.
5 Pts.
● Delivery is relaxed and conversational. 5 Pts.
● Delivery is well suited for an online format. 5 Pts.
Total Points for
Presentation Portion: 20
Pts.
Total Points for
Assignment: 80 Pts.
Resources & Supplemental Assignments:
Assignments in the module are designed to assist the student as
they construct the
speech and provide small group activities which allow them to
practice the skills
needed to successfully complete the assignment. These are the
assignment:
● Q#3: Topic Selection for the Advocacy Speech assists the
student as they
select the organization they will speak about during the speech.
● E#7: Monroes Motivated Sequence will provide an
opportunity to apply the
principles of MMS in small group presentations.

● Q#4: Peer Outline Review will give students the opportunity
to review the
work of other students and receive feedback prior to submitting
the final
assignment.
上一页下一页
https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1472060/modules/items/131
39905
https://sjsu.instructure.com/courses/1472060/modules/items/131
39908

Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - RubricCollapse Al

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - RubricCollapse Al

Similar to Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - RubricCollapse Al (20)

More from ChantellPantoja184

More from ChantellPantoja184 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Benchmark - Capstone Project Change Proposal - RubricCollapse Al