For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity
NR 505 Education Organization - snaptutorial.comranga23
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
NR 505 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.comDavisMurphyA60
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
NR 505 Education Organization - snaptutorial.comranga23
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
NR 505 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.comDavisMurphyA60
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
NR 451 RANK Redefined Education--nr451rank.comkopiko183
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nr451rank.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use?
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient and family preferences? What is the nurse's responsibility when EBP and patient and family practice do not match?
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the
NR 451 Education Organization - snaptutorial.comranga22
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use?
Nr 451 Education Specialist -snaptutorial.comDavisMurphyC67
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient
NR 451 RANK Introduction Education--nr451rank.comGVlaxmi15
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nr451rank.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient and family preferences? What is the nurse's responsibility when EBP and patient and family practice do not match?
NR 451 RANK Become Exceptional--nr451rank.comshanaabe69
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nr451rank.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use?
NRS 433 STUDY Educational Specialist--nrs433study.comVSNaipaul14
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nrs433study.com
Identify two areas of nursing practice, which evidence-based practice has improved patient outcomes. State the study and its impact on patient care. How have these findings changed your nursing practice? Please support your response with a minimum of two supporting peer reviewed articles.
NRS 433 STUDY Become Exceptional--nrs433study.comkopiko138
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nrs433study.com
Identify two areas of nursing practice, which evidence-based practice has improved patient outcomes. State the study and its impact on patient care. How have these findings
PROJ 587 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew60
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Course Project: Portfolio Management Plan
Your Professor will determine whether the Course Project is an individual or team assignment. If the project is completed as a team, your professor will assign teams promptly. (Watch for an announcement.)
Objectives | Project Deliverables | Schedule and Grading Rubric | Paper Guidelines
Week 3 Quality Improvement Model Application Guidelines With SMoseStaton39
Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application
Guidelines With Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to (a) provide examples of a quality improvement initiative or patient safety issue in any healthcare delivery setting, (b) explore the contributing factors for this adverse medical outcome, (c) apply quality improvement theories and philosophies to a healthcare management project, (d) demonstrate an understanding of quality improvement tools by correctly choosing and using them in specific cases, and (e) recognize the extent of problems of patient safety in medical care.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.
· Apply frameworks and theories for improving quality of care in various healthcare systems. (CO 1)
· Use critical inquiry to evaluate the design, implementation, and outcomes of quality and safety improvement strategies. (CO 3)
· Advance knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for the continuous improvement of quality and safety in healthcare. (CO 5)
Due Date: Submit by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3.
Total Points Possible: 230Requirements
Assignment Criteria for the Paper1. Identify any existing quality concern or an existing patient safety issue and provide the rationale for choosing this issue.2. Explain the background and scope of the problem.3. Analyze the issue based on the appropriate quality philosophy.
4. Identify the regulatory guidelines, internal and/or external benchmarks, or evidence-based practice standards surrounding the issue—explain what that expectation is and why. 5. Use the appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome. 6. Describe how you could or will get involved in this initiative to make a difference and move it forward to enactment.7. Summarize the content in concluding statements.8. The body of the scholarly paper is to be 3–5 pages in length excluding title and reference pages.9. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition.10. Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media.Preparing the paper
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction and quality concern
25
11%
Identify a quality issue/patient safety issue and provide a rationale.
Background and scope of the problem
20
9%
Analyze the problem from a literature review and a practical point of view.
Goals of improvement
20
9%
Identify three goals to improve the problem.
Quality philosophy application
35
15%
Using a quality model, analyze the patient safety concern and the intervention to bridge the gaps.
Identification of the regulatory guidelines and internal/external benchmarks or EBP standards for this issue
40
17%
D ...
Chamberlain College of NursingNR451RN Capstone CourseCapsto.docxmichelljubborjudd
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR451:
RN Capstone Course
Capstone Project Milestone
2:
Design for Change
Proposal
Guide
lines
Purpose
You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your
P
ractice
I
ssue
and Evidence Summary
worksheet
from your Capstone Project Milestone #1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
•
CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1)
•
CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)
Due Date
Milestone
2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change
Capstone Project. Submit this assignment
to the Dropbox by the end of
Week 4
.
Points
Milestone
2 is worth
225 points
.
Directions
1.
Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the
NR451_Milestone2_Design_Proposal_
template in Course Resources
to create your paper
. You will include
the information from Milestone
1, your
practice issue
and evidence summary
worksheet
s
, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a
practice
problem you have uncovered
that
is significant enough to change
current practice
.
2.
The format for this proposal will be a paper following the
Publication manual of APA
6
th
edition.
3.
The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.
4.
As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.
a.
Introduction:
Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association
(2010, p. 63).
Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.
b.
Change
Model Overview:
Overview of ACE Star model; define the scope of the EBP; identify the stakeholders, and determine the responsibility of the team members.
c.
Evidence:
Conduct internal and external searches of evidence; integrate and summarize the evidence summary worksheet from Milestone 1; develop a recommendation for change.
d.
Translation:
develop a hypothetical action plan; include measurable outcomes, reporting to stakeholders; identify next steps and disseminate the findings.
e.
...
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docxtidwellveronique
Case Study Two Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: Think about a time you received a product or service and you were not satisfied with the quality of the service or product. For this case study, you will
focus on the four components of customer-relationship management that are essential in total quality management. This case study will examine your viewpoint as the customer and put you in the seat of the quality manager.
1. Complaint Resolution. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: Explain the nature of the quality issue for your service or product and provide a description of how you went about addressing your quality complaint with the service provider or product manufacturer. Were you satisfied with how your complaint was handled?
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain why complaints or defects should be viewed as a good thing from a company standpoint.
2. Feedback. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: What type of feedback did you get from the service provider or product manufacturer? Were you asked, or did you participate in any type of solicited customer feedback such as a survey?
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain the benefit of using customer feedback to improve the company’s customer service and quality. Explain which customer feedback tool you believe would provide the most benefit for your company.
3. Guarantees. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: What type of guarantee did you receive based on your quality issue? Was the guarantee consistent with the five elements of an effective guarantee? Please explain why or why not.
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain the importance of having an effective guarantee policy from a marketing and quality standpoint.
4. Corrective Action. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Based on the quality issue presented in this case study, you have been asked to lead a team to improve the process and implement a corrective action. Your thoughts and reasoning can be hypothetical for this aspect of the case study. You are encouraged to do research to determine elements of an effective corrective action.
Provide an explanation for what happened for the quality issue to occur.
Describe the steps you would take to resolve the quality issue so it does not occur again.
Requirements of Submission: The case study assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one- inch margins. Each case study should be one to two pages in length. Include at least two sources of research and follow APA guidelines for citations and references.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%)
Not Evident ...
MGT672
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Requirements
Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Limited Evidence - Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Content
Exceeds Expectation - Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.
Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.
Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.
Limited Evidence - Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.
25-30 Points
19-24 Points
13-18 Points
7-12 Points
Analysis
Exceeds Expectation - Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Limited Evidence - Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
13-15 Points
10-12 Points
7-9 Points
4-6 Points
Sources
Exceeds Expectation - Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Limited Evidence - Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
4 Points
3 Points
1-2 Points
Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
Exceeds Expectation - Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
B ...
PJM6125 Project Evaluation:
Stakeholder Analysis & Evaluation Goal Matrix
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will establish some evaluation goals for your project based on the
method and lens covered in this week’s lecture.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO1: Identify and analyze stakeholders associated with performance evaluation.
LO2: Design an evaluation goals matrix incorporating the differences between impact, efficiency,
and effectiveness
LO6: Compare change management procedures needed to respond to the results of both tactical
and non-tactical performance evaluation
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative measures
Essential Components & Instructions
This assignment is completed in two parts. First, using your chosen project that you
submitted as part of Lesson 1, complete the following items:
Stakeholder Register / Analysis:
Create a stakeholder register / analysis that includes the following minimum
columns:
o Stakeholder
o Stakeholder Position / Role
o Type of Stakeholder (internal or external)
o Stakeholder expectation (high level needs or expectations of project)
o Stakeholder interest (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder influence level (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder view of project (supportive / neutral / opposed)
o Stakeholder Management strategy (approach to engaging stakeholder to
support success of project)
Once you create the register, create entries for a minimum of 12 - 15 project
stakeholders, performing a full analysis for each of them.
Part 2: Evaluation Goals Matrix:
After completing the stakeholder register, you will create an evaluation goals matrix, as
illustrated in Lesson 2, with an additional column entitled stakeholder. Once you have
designed the evaluation goal matrix, you will need to list at least four evaluation goals for
each category: efficiency, effectiveness, and impact, which will result in a total of 12 metrics
/ goals.
You will be assess on the clarity of the metrics, the concreteness of the measures (Example:
increased performance by 12 percent (concrete) vs. increase performance (not concrete, as
no specific measurement of increase)), and how well the metric will measure the success of
project relative to the overview of the project you provided as a case study.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in all three elements of
this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the
attached grading rubric.
Part 1 and Part 2 (stakeholder analysis and evaluation matrix) should be submitted
as a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should include a brief summary of your chosen project.
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable.
Chapter 14: certifications
IT Framework standards
ITIL – Information Technology Infrastructure Library
ISO – International Standards Organization
COBIT – Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies
CMMI – Capability Maturity Model Integration
Benefits of certification
Companies showcase their certifications as a means to show your plans are tested
Certifications build confidence in the plan
Increase value for the company to be certified
ITIL
Information Technology Infrastructure Library was created in 1980s to bring order to its various data operations
Eventually evolved into a broad body of knowledge
Emphasis on service management
Certifies the individual who creates and implements the program
ITIL - SLA
ITIL is based on service-level agreements (SLAs)
SLAs govern IT support for everyday incident resolution
SLA are periodically analyzed
Periodic performance reports are issued to all parties
SLA are updated based upon business needs
ITIL – Discipline Areas
Business Impact Analysis
Business Continuity Strategy
Specific recovery actions, written disaster recovery plan, proactive plan of business resilience, testing plan, training plan
Manager is appointed to lead the effort
Program remains active to keep plans current
ISO
International Standards Organization contains several standards:
ISO22300: Societal security – terminology
ISO 22301: Societal security – business
ISO 22313: Societal security – business continuity management systems
ISO 22317: Societal security – business continuity management systems – guidelines for BIA
ISO 22398: Societal security – guidelines for exercises
Clause 4: Company’s context
Clause 4 requires the company to understand the needs of all critical stakeholders
1. Review with legal advisor what is required to meet regulatory obligations
2. Ask the Board for their guidance for disaster recovery and business continuity planning
3. Review how the DR/BCP program fits with the company’s business strategies and goals
4. Talk to your customers to learn what they expect in a crisis
5. Talk to employees
Clause 5: Leadership
Examine top management involvement and it the appropriate leadership support is provided at all levels
1. Issue appropriate company policies supporting the program
2. provide the necessary resources for the program
3. Generate company-side support
Clause 6: Planning
Expands the DR/BCP program scope into specific objectives
Well-written objective has measurable criteria
Project plan to create DR/BCP is drafter
Clause 7: support
Identifies the requirements for supporting the ongoing program
Ensure that the personnel tasked with supporting the various recovery plans understand their role and responsibilities
Ensure that people who run the program have the proper training
Create a documented and tested plan to communicated with significant stakeholders
Clause 8: Operations
Details the basic document ...
CLC Group Values Part -1 (What do we need to do to ensure ou.docxclarebernice
CLC Group Values Part -1
(What do we need to do to ensure our team’s success?)
What each team member agrees to do
Why this is important to the team
Check into the CLC regularly to review progress on the assignment
Contribute ideas and feedback to the group from initial discussions throughout project completion
Communicate with all CLC members as soon as a problem or issue arises
Maintain respectful communications with all team members
Complete assigned tasks by the deadlines set by the CLC members
Take a leadership role in CLC assignments
Make sure to cite and reference all sources of information used in completing tasks
Other:
Other:
Project Management Specifics Part -2
(What needs to be undertaken to complete the CLC project?)
CLC Group Member’s Name
Task to be completed by this team member
Due date for completing the task for the CLC to review
My part
Contributing one or more ideas for how the project should be completed
My part
Outlining the CLC project
Assigning tasks to CLC members
Performing research on assigned topics and writing it up for CLC members to review
Making sure everyone meets their assigned deadlines for tasks
Proofreading and editing the paper
Submitting the paper via the Assignments feature by the due date deadline
Other:
Other:
CLC Group Interaction Guidelines- part 3
(How can we anticipate and deal with group conflict when it arises?)
What could happen to impede our teamwork
What we will do if this happens
A CLC member doesn’t provide project ideas or feedback to other team members
A CLC member doesn’t complete his or her task at all
A CLC member completes his or her task, but turns it in after the agreed-upon due date
Other:
Other:
CLC Group Review Process –part 4
(What makes a CLC effective?)
What did our CLC do well this time?
What can we do to be a more effective CLC next time?
· Created by GCU Faculty Training and Development
March 15, 2013 Page 4 of 4
CLC - Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development - Case Study
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Current Appraisal Methods
The description does not include the current appraisal method.
The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.
The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.
The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices.
The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices.
25.0 %Changes or Strategies for Telespazio
The description does not include changes or strategies for the company.
The description includes some changes or stra ...
Week 3 Assignment Addressing BiasGuidelines with Scoring Rubric.docxcockekeshia
Week 3 Assignment: Addressing BiasGuidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
In today’s current healthcare settings, the increasing diversity, globalization, and expanding technologies produce complex ethical pressures that influence nursing practice and practice outcomes. To be effective in a master’s-prepared advanced nurse practice role it is important to understand personal values, beliefs, strengths, and limitations. The purpose of this assessment is to promote introspective reflection related to implicit and/or explicit personal biases. Students will develop a plan to reduce bias and promote personal and professional growth.
Course Outcomes
Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO 1: Examine roles and competencies of master’s-prepared nurses essential to performing as leaders and advocates of safe and quality care.
CO 2: Apply concepts of person-centered care to nursing practice situations.
Total Points Possible
This assessment is worth 125 points.
Due Date
Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 3.
Requirements
Criteria for Content
Complete a self-inventory on personal biases you hold. The biases might be implicit or explicit.
1. In a one to two-page summary, address the following.
a. Identify your selected specialty track (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).
b. Discuss how biases can impact outcomes in selected nursing practice settings.
c. Identify personal biases and attitudes toward people with various cultural, gender, sexual orientation, age, weight, and religions that are different than your own.
d. Select one bias that you have.
e. Develop one strategy to reduce this bias.
Preparing the paper
Submission Requirements
1. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.
2. Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at maximum two pages.
3. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.
4. Submission: Submit your files: Last name_First initial_Wk3Assignment_Addressing Bias
Best Practices in Preparing the Project
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
1. Review directions thoroughly.
2. Follow submission requirements.
3. Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
5. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
6. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
7. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.
8. Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.
Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduc.
NR 451 RANK Redefined Education--nr451rank.comkopiko183
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nr451rank.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use?
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient and family preferences? What is the nurse's responsibility when EBP and patient and family practice do not match?
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the
NR 451 Education Organization - snaptutorial.comranga22
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use?
Nr 451 Education Specialist -snaptutorial.comDavisMurphyC67
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient
NR 451 RANK Introduction Education--nr451rank.comGVlaxmi15
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nr451rank.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use? How does the strength of the evidence determine translation into practice? Why is it important to integrate both evidence-based practice and patient and family preferences? What is the nurse's responsibility when EBP and patient and family practice do not match?
NR 451 RANK Become Exceptional--nr451rank.comshanaabe69
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nr451rank.com
Types of Nursing Models and Frameworks of EBP
What are some of the models and frameworks of EBP currently in use?
NRS 433 STUDY Educational Specialist--nrs433study.comVSNaipaul14
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nrs433study.com
Identify two areas of nursing practice, which evidence-based practice has improved patient outcomes. State the study and its impact on patient care. How have these findings changed your nursing practice? Please support your response with a minimum of two supporting peer reviewed articles.
NRS 433 STUDY Become Exceptional--nrs433study.comkopiko138
FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
www.nrs433study.com
Identify two areas of nursing practice, which evidence-based practice has improved patient outcomes. State the study and its impact on patient care. How have these findings
PROJ 587 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.comBartholomew60
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
Course Project: Portfolio Management Plan
Your Professor will determine whether the Course Project is an individual or team assignment. If the project is completed as a team, your professor will assign teams promptly. (Watch for an announcement.)
Objectives | Project Deliverables | Schedule and Grading Rubric | Paper Guidelines
Week 3 Quality Improvement Model Application Guidelines With SMoseStaton39
Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application
Guidelines With Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to (a) provide examples of a quality improvement initiative or patient safety issue in any healthcare delivery setting, (b) explore the contributing factors for this adverse medical outcome, (c) apply quality improvement theories and philosophies to a healthcare management project, (d) demonstrate an understanding of quality improvement tools by correctly choosing and using them in specific cases, and (e) recognize the extent of problems of patient safety in medical care.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.
· Apply frameworks and theories for improving quality of care in various healthcare systems. (CO 1)
· Use critical inquiry to evaluate the design, implementation, and outcomes of quality and safety improvement strategies. (CO 3)
· Advance knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for the continuous improvement of quality and safety in healthcare. (CO 5)
Due Date: Submit by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3.
Total Points Possible: 230Requirements
Assignment Criteria for the Paper1. Identify any existing quality concern or an existing patient safety issue and provide the rationale for choosing this issue.2. Explain the background and scope of the problem.3. Analyze the issue based on the appropriate quality philosophy.
4. Identify the regulatory guidelines, internal and/or external benchmarks, or evidence-based practice standards surrounding the issue—explain what that expectation is and why. 5. Use the appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome. 6. Describe how you could or will get involved in this initiative to make a difference and move it forward to enactment.7. Summarize the content in concluding statements.8. The body of the scholarly paper is to be 3–5 pages in length excluding title and reference pages.9. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition.10. Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media.Preparing the paper
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduction and quality concern
25
11%
Identify a quality issue/patient safety issue and provide a rationale.
Background and scope of the problem
20
9%
Analyze the problem from a literature review and a practical point of view.
Goals of improvement
20
9%
Identify three goals to improve the problem.
Quality philosophy application
35
15%
Using a quality model, analyze the patient safety concern and the intervention to bridge the gaps.
Identification of the regulatory guidelines and internal/external benchmarks or EBP standards for this issue
40
17%
D ...
Chamberlain College of NursingNR451RN Capstone CourseCapsto.docxmichelljubborjudd
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR451:
RN Capstone Course
Capstone Project Milestone
2:
Design for Change
Proposal
Guide
lines
Purpose
You are to create a Design for Change proposal inclusive of your
P
ractice
I
ssue
and Evidence Summary
worksheet
from your Capstone Project Milestone #1. Your plan is to convince your management team of a nursing problem you have uncovered and you feel is significant enough to change the way something is currently practiced. In the event you are not currently working as a nurse, please use a hypothetical clinical situation you experienced in nursing school, or nursing education issue you identified in your nursing program.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
•
CO1: Applies the theories and principles of nursing and related disciplines to individuals, families, aggregates, and communities from entry to the healthcare system through long-term planning. (PO #1)
•
CO2: Proposes leadership and collaboration strategies for use with consumers and other healthcare providers in managing care and/or delegating responsibilities for health promotion, illness prevention, health restoration and maintenance, and rehabilitative activities. (PO #2)
Due Date
Milestone
2 consists of the proposal for your Design for Change
Capstone Project. Submit this assignment
to the Dropbox by the end of
Week 4
.
Points
Milestone
2 is worth
225 points
.
Directions
1.
Create a proposal for your Design for Change Capstone Project. Open the
NR451_Milestone2_Design_Proposal_
template in Course Resources
to create your paper
. You will include
the information from Milestone
1, your
practice issue
and evidence summary
worksheet
s
, as you compose this proposal. Your plan is to convince your management team of a
practice
problem you have uncovered
that
is significant enough to change
current practice
.
2.
The format for this proposal will be a paper following the
Publication manual of APA
6
th
edition.
3.
The paper is to be four- to six-pages excluding the Title page and Reference page.
4.
As you organize your information and evidence, include the following topics.
a.
Introduction:
Write an introduction but do not use “Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association
(2010, p. 63).
Introduce the reader to the plan with evidence-based problem identification and solution.
b.
Change
Model Overview:
Overview of ACE Star model; define the scope of the EBP; identify the stakeholders, and determine the responsibility of the team members.
c.
Evidence:
Conduct internal and external searches of evidence; integrate and summarize the evidence summary worksheet from Milestone 1; develop a recommendation for change.
d.
Translation:
develop a hypothetical action plan; include measurable outcomes, reporting to stakeholders; identify next steps and disseminate the findings.
e.
...
Case Study Two Guidelines and RubricPrompt Think about a time.docxtidwellveronique
Case Study Two Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: Think about a time you received a product or service and you were not satisfied with the quality of the service or product. For this case study, you will
focus on the four components of customer-relationship management that are essential in total quality management. This case study will examine your viewpoint as the customer and put you in the seat of the quality manager.
1. Complaint Resolution. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: Explain the nature of the quality issue for your service or product and provide a description of how you went about addressing your quality complaint with the service provider or product manufacturer. Were you satisfied with how your complaint was handled?
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain why complaints or defects should be viewed as a good thing from a company standpoint.
2. Feedback. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: What type of feedback did you get from the service provider or product manufacturer? Were you asked, or did you participate in any type of solicited customer feedback such as a survey?
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain the benefit of using customer feedback to improve the company’s customer service and quality. Explain which customer feedback tool you believe would provide the most benefit for your company.
3. Guarantees. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Customer Viewpoint: What type of guarantee did you receive based on your quality issue? Was the guarantee consistent with the five elements of an effective guarantee? Please explain why or why not.
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Explain the importance of having an effective guarantee policy from a marketing and quality standpoint.
4. Corrective Action. Provide two to three sentences for each viewpoint.
Quality Manager Viewpoint: Based on the quality issue presented in this case study, you have been asked to lead a team to improve the process and implement a corrective action. Your thoughts and reasoning can be hypothetical for this aspect of the case study. You are encouraged to do research to determine elements of an effective corrective action.
Provide an explanation for what happened for the quality issue to occur.
Describe the steps you would take to resolve the quality issue so it does not occur again.
Requirements of Submission: The case study assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one- inch margins. Each case study should be one to two pages in length. Include at least two sources of research and follow APA guidelines for citations and references.
Instructor Feedback: This activity uses an integrated rubric in Blackboard. Students can view instructor feedback in the Grade Center. For more information, review these instructions.
Critical Elements
Exemplary (100%)
Proficient (85%)
Needs Improvement (55%)
Not Evident ...
MGT672
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Requirements
Exceeds Expectation -Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
Limited Evidence - Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
21-25 Points
16-20 Points
11-15 Points
6-10 Points
Content
Exceeds Expectation - Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.
Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.
Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.
Limited Evidence - Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.
25-30 Points
19-24 Points
13-18 Points
7-12 Points
Analysis
Exceeds Expectation - Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
Limited Evidence - Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of the Business Problem Solving model, concepts and applications.
13-15 Points
10-12 Points
7-9 Points
4-6 Points
Sources
Exceeds Expectation - Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
Limited Evidence - Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
4 Points
3 Points
1-2 Points
Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
Exceeds Expectation - Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment.
Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.
B ...
PJM6125 Project Evaluation:
Stakeholder Analysis & Evaluation Goal Matrix
Overview and Rationale
For this assignment, you will establish some evaluation goals for your project based on the
method and lens covered in this week’s lecture.
Program and Course Outcomes
This assignment is directly linked to the following key learning outcomes from the course
syllabus:
LO1: Identify and analyze stakeholders associated with performance evaluation.
LO2: Design an evaluation goals matrix incorporating the differences between impact, efficiency,
and effectiveness
LO6: Compare change management procedures needed to respond to the results of both tactical
and non-tactical performance evaluation
L07: Plan and conduct a tactical evaluation using both qualitative and quantitative measures
Essential Components & Instructions
This assignment is completed in two parts. First, using your chosen project that you
submitted as part of Lesson 1, complete the following items:
Stakeholder Register / Analysis:
Create a stakeholder register / analysis that includes the following minimum
columns:
o Stakeholder
o Stakeholder Position / Role
o Type of Stakeholder (internal or external)
o Stakeholder expectation (high level needs or expectations of project)
o Stakeholder interest (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder influence level (high / medium / low)
o Stakeholder view of project (supportive / neutral / opposed)
o Stakeholder Management strategy (approach to engaging stakeholder to
support success of project)
Once you create the register, create entries for a minimum of 12 - 15 project
stakeholders, performing a full analysis for each of them.
Part 2: Evaluation Goals Matrix:
After completing the stakeholder register, you will create an evaluation goals matrix, as
illustrated in Lesson 2, with an additional column entitled stakeholder. Once you have
designed the evaluation goal matrix, you will need to list at least four evaluation goals for
each category: efficiency, effectiveness, and impact, which will result in a total of 12 metrics
/ goals.
You will be assess on the clarity of the metrics, the concreteness of the measures (Example:
increased performance by 12 percent (concrete) vs. increase performance (not concrete, as
no specific measurement of increase)), and how well the metric will measure the success of
project relative to the overview of the project you provided as a case study.
Format
Below are some key guidelines you will want to ensure you follow in all three elements of
this assignment. Think of this short list as a quality control checklist, along with the
attached grading rubric.
Part 1 and Part 2 (stakeholder analysis and evaluation matrix) should be submitted
as a single file (MsWord or .pdf)
You should include a cover page
You should include a brief summary of your chosen project.
You should format the documents professionally
The tables should be readable.
Chapter 14: certifications
IT Framework standards
ITIL – Information Technology Infrastructure Library
ISO – International Standards Organization
COBIT – Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies
CMMI – Capability Maturity Model Integration
Benefits of certification
Companies showcase their certifications as a means to show your plans are tested
Certifications build confidence in the plan
Increase value for the company to be certified
ITIL
Information Technology Infrastructure Library was created in 1980s to bring order to its various data operations
Eventually evolved into a broad body of knowledge
Emphasis on service management
Certifies the individual who creates and implements the program
ITIL - SLA
ITIL is based on service-level agreements (SLAs)
SLAs govern IT support for everyday incident resolution
SLA are periodically analyzed
Periodic performance reports are issued to all parties
SLA are updated based upon business needs
ITIL – Discipline Areas
Business Impact Analysis
Business Continuity Strategy
Specific recovery actions, written disaster recovery plan, proactive plan of business resilience, testing plan, training plan
Manager is appointed to lead the effort
Program remains active to keep plans current
ISO
International Standards Organization contains several standards:
ISO22300: Societal security – terminology
ISO 22301: Societal security – business
ISO 22313: Societal security – business continuity management systems
ISO 22317: Societal security – business continuity management systems – guidelines for BIA
ISO 22398: Societal security – guidelines for exercises
Clause 4: Company’s context
Clause 4 requires the company to understand the needs of all critical stakeholders
1. Review with legal advisor what is required to meet regulatory obligations
2. Ask the Board for their guidance for disaster recovery and business continuity planning
3. Review how the DR/BCP program fits with the company’s business strategies and goals
4. Talk to your customers to learn what they expect in a crisis
5. Talk to employees
Clause 5: Leadership
Examine top management involvement and it the appropriate leadership support is provided at all levels
1. Issue appropriate company policies supporting the program
2. provide the necessary resources for the program
3. Generate company-side support
Clause 6: Planning
Expands the DR/BCP program scope into specific objectives
Well-written objective has measurable criteria
Project plan to create DR/BCP is drafter
Clause 7: support
Identifies the requirements for supporting the ongoing program
Ensure that the personnel tasked with supporting the various recovery plans understand their role and responsibilities
Ensure that people who run the program have the proper training
Create a documented and tested plan to communicated with significant stakeholders
Clause 8: Operations
Details the basic document ...
CLC Group Values Part -1 (What do we need to do to ensure ou.docxclarebernice
CLC Group Values Part -1
(What do we need to do to ensure our team’s success?)
What each team member agrees to do
Why this is important to the team
Check into the CLC regularly to review progress on the assignment
Contribute ideas and feedback to the group from initial discussions throughout project completion
Communicate with all CLC members as soon as a problem or issue arises
Maintain respectful communications with all team members
Complete assigned tasks by the deadlines set by the CLC members
Take a leadership role in CLC assignments
Make sure to cite and reference all sources of information used in completing tasks
Other:
Other:
Project Management Specifics Part -2
(What needs to be undertaken to complete the CLC project?)
CLC Group Member’s Name
Task to be completed by this team member
Due date for completing the task for the CLC to review
My part
Contributing one or more ideas for how the project should be completed
My part
Outlining the CLC project
Assigning tasks to CLC members
Performing research on assigned topics and writing it up for CLC members to review
Making sure everyone meets their assigned deadlines for tasks
Proofreading and editing the paper
Submitting the paper via the Assignments feature by the due date deadline
Other:
Other:
CLC Group Interaction Guidelines- part 3
(How can we anticipate and deal with group conflict when it arises?)
What could happen to impede our teamwork
What we will do if this happens
A CLC member doesn’t provide project ideas or feedback to other team members
A CLC member doesn’t complete his or her task at all
A CLC member completes his or her task, but turns it in after the agreed-upon due date
Other:
Other:
CLC Group Review Process –part 4
(What makes a CLC effective?)
What did our CLC do well this time?
What can we do to be a more effective CLC next time?
· Created by GCU Faculty Training and Development
March 15, 2013 Page 4 of 4
CLC - Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development - Case Study
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Current Appraisal Methods
The description does not include the current appraisal method.
The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.
The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.
The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices.
The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices.
25.0 %Changes or Strategies for Telespazio
The description does not include changes or strategies for the company.
The description includes some changes or stra ...
Week 3 Assignment Addressing BiasGuidelines with Scoring Rubric.docxcockekeshia
Week 3 Assignment: Addressing BiasGuidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
In today’s current healthcare settings, the increasing diversity, globalization, and expanding technologies produce complex ethical pressures that influence nursing practice and practice outcomes. To be effective in a master’s-prepared advanced nurse practice role it is important to understand personal values, beliefs, strengths, and limitations. The purpose of this assessment is to promote introspective reflection related to implicit and/or explicit personal biases. Students will develop a plan to reduce bias and promote personal and professional growth.
Course Outcomes
Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO 1: Examine roles and competencies of master’s-prepared nurses essential to performing as leaders and advocates of safe and quality care.
CO 2: Apply concepts of person-centered care to nursing practice situations.
Total Points Possible
This assessment is worth 125 points.
Due Date
Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 3.
Requirements
Criteria for Content
Complete a self-inventory on personal biases you hold. The biases might be implicit or explicit.
1. In a one to two-page summary, address the following.
a. Identify your selected specialty track (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).
b. Discuss how biases can impact outcomes in selected nursing practice settings.
c. Identify personal biases and attitudes toward people with various cultural, gender, sexual orientation, age, weight, and religions that are different than your own.
d. Select one bias that you have.
e. Develop one strategy to reduce this bias.
Preparing the paper
Submission Requirements
1. Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.
2. Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at maximum two pages.
3. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.
4. Submission: Submit your files: Last name_First initial_Wk3Assignment_Addressing Bias
Best Practices in Preparing the Project
The following are best practices in preparing this project.
1. Review directions thoroughly.
2. Follow submission requirements.
3. Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.
4. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
5. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
6. Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.
7. A minimum of two (2) scholarly literature references must be used.
8. Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.
Grading Criteria
Category
Points
%
Description
Introduc.
Research Question1. What strategic, tactical and operatio.docxaudeleypearl
Research Question?
1. What strategic, tactical and operational choices should A&S Service implements to increase its profit by 5% in the next 2 years in Denmark?
Sub Questions:
1. What is the current position of A&S Service in Danish Market?
2. What are the potential opportunities to encourage A&S growth in Danish Market?
3. What could be the marketing strategies that A&S Service should use to maximize its B2B customers?
Table of Contents
1. About the Thesis
2. Problem Area
2.1 Problem Formulation
2.2 Sub-Questions
3. Delimitation and limitation
4. Research Methods Chapter
4.1 Research Philosophy
4.2 Research Approach
4.3 Research methods
4.4 Time Horizon
4.5 Data Collection
4.6 Critic of Source
5. Theoretical Chapter/logical flow
6. Case Company
6.1 Company Overview
7. Internal Analysis
7.1 Business Model Canvas (BMC)
7.2 Company Mission and Vision
7.3 VRIO
7.4 Financial Performance
7.5 ST of SWOT Analysis
8. External Analysis
8.1 PEST Analysis
8.2 Porters Five Forces
8.3 OT of SWOT Analysis
9. Strategic, Tactical and Functional aspects
9.1 Porter’s Generic Strategies
9.2 Ansoff’s Growth Matrix
9.3 STP Model (Segmentation, Targeting and Positioning)
9.4 Marketing Mix
10. Budget and Action Plan
11. Conclusion
12. Appendices
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment TitleTotal PointsNRS-433VNRS-433V-O502Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations200.0CriteriaPercentage1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)2: Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)3: Satisfactory (83.00%)4: Good (94.00%)5: Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints EarnedContent75.0%Qualitative Studies5.0%Only one article is presented. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research.Two articles are presented. Of the articles presented, only one article is based on qualitative research.N/AN/ATwo articles are presented. Both articles are based on qualitative research.A position statement is not real qualitative research.7.50/10.00Background of Study10.0%Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is incomplete.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is partially complete and includes some relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is complete and includes relevant details and explanation.Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.18.80/20.00Article Support of Nursing Practice Issue15.0%Discussion on how articles support the PICOT question is incomplete.A summary of how articles support the PICOT ...
Week 3: Assignment: Organizational Needs Assessment
Submit Assignment
Due
Mar 21 by 11:59pm
Points
125
Submitting
a file upload
Purpose
The identification of a need is the cornerstone of a project. The purpose of this assignment is to conduct an organizational needs assessment. The formulation of a comprehensive organizational needs assessment supports the professional formation of the DNP-prepared nurse. To complete the assessment of the organizational need, you will need to interview a key decision-maker at the practicum site. For students not implementing their DNP Project at a practicum site, complete the assignment as if you had interviewed a key decision-maker at a practicum site.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 2: Formulate a needs-based organizational assessment to inform strategic leadership decision-making. (POs 3, 5, 7)
CO 3: Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high value healthcare. (POs 3, 5, 7)
Due Date(s)
Submit your assignment by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 3. The late assignment policy applies to this assignment.
Total points possible: 125
Page Requirement:
Length: 3-4 pages, excluding cover page and references
Instructions
To create flexibility, we are providing you options on this assignment. Concept maps are an effective way to express complex ideas, especially for visual learners. For this assignment, each of the sections can be presented
either
as a narrative
or
as a concept map.
Please note that you are not required to complete any or all sections as a concept map. If you choose to use a concept map for a section, it should be created in Microsoft Word and placed in that section of your paper. The concept map must meet all the requirements of the assignment rubric for that section. The rubric and page length requirements of the paper are unchanged.
If you need additional information about concept maps and how to create a concept map in Microsoft Word, please access the following resources.
Link (video):
Microsoft Word: Creating a Flowchart, Concept Map, or Process Map
(4:03)
Link (video):
Concept Mapping for Developing your Research
(3:37)
Review the Graduate Re-Purpose Policy in the Student Handbook, page 15:
Repurposed Work (Chamberlain University Graduate Programs only): Graduate students have the opportunity to use previously submitted ideas as a foundation for future courses. No more than 50 percent of an assignment, excluding references, may be repurposed from another Chamberlain University course (excluding practicum courses). Previous course assignments that are deemed building blocks will be notated in the syllabus by the course leader. As with every assignment, students must uphold academic integrity; therefore, students must follow the guidelines for remaining academically honest according to the Academic Integrity policy. If the instr ...
scano1232017-03-06 0021 Chamberlain College of NursingNR 45.docxinfantkimber
scano123
2017-03-06 00:21
Chamberlain College of Nursing
NR 451
RN
Capstone Course
Capstone
Project
Milestone 1
:
Practice Issue and
Evidence
Summary
Guidelines
Purpose
Clear identification of the practice issue is the first step in evidence-based nursing. Next, the evidence is reviewed to determine the best interventio
n to change practice outcomes.
Completion of the milestone will include identification of the practice issue using the ACE Star model of Knowledge Transformation and a review of the evidence that will support an intervention that will change outcomes. The evidence summary will be conducted through the ‘breaking down’ of a systematic review on your topic for
your change project.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
•
CO4: Develops and outlines a scientific, systematic decision-making process to integrate critical thinking with clinical judgment to assure safe and effective outcomes. (PO #4)
•
CO8: Selects evidence for best practice when planning professional nursing care for individuals, families, aggregates, and communities. (PO #8)
Due Dates
Milestone #1 consists of the completion of
two
worksheet
s (Practice Issue Worksheet) and (Evidence Summary Worksheet)
. Submit the completed worksheet
s
to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of
Week 3
.
Points
Milestone #1 is worth
175 points
(75 points for the Practice Issue and 100 points for the Evidence Summary).
Practice Issue Worksheet
Directions
1.
Practice Issue Worksheet:
a.
Read the guidelines including the grading rubrics below.
You will use this worksheet to
document the practice issue presented and approved by your instructor in the Week 2 Discussions.
i.
Your practice issue will be the same for all three Milestone assignments in this course.
b.
Please type your answers directly into the worksheet.
Evidence Summary Worksheet
Directions
2.
Evidence Summary Worksheet
:
a.
Read the guidelines including the grading rubrics below. You will use this worksheet to incorporate your evidence summary into your Week 4 Milestone 2 assignment.
b.
Find a systematic review article in the Chamberlain library on your topic. Your Systematic Review Article must be
peer-reviewed
and include a
narrative summary
.
i.
Go to the Chamberlain Library, click on RNBSN; NR451 Capstone course
.
You can find systematic reviews from many databases within the library, or by searching from the library homepage main search bar.
ii.
To search, combine the phrase 'systematic review' with your topic using the Boolean search operator AND. For example, if you are looking for a systematic review on fall prevention, you would use this Boolean search phrase: systematic review AND fall prevention.
c.
Type in your practice issue in the search tab; choose a systematic review article with a
narrative summary
to complete your worksheet.
d.
Please type your answers directly into the worksheet.
Grading C ...
NR 506 Inspiring Innovation/tutorialrank.comjonhson143
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 506 Week 1 Discussion The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing
NR 506 Week 2 Discussion Policy-Priority Selection
NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates Michigan)
Shared Governance Journey Guidelines with Scoring RubricPurpos.docxedgar6wallace88877
Shared Governance Journey
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) identify and articulate key concepts of one of the following: either your future pathway to excellence or your shared-governance model you wish to initiate at one of the three areas: 1. Saint Louis Medical Center (SLMC)/community or critical access hospital, 2. Home health/community transition, or 3. Long term care/skilled nursing facility (SNF) or memory care (CO 5), (b) provide empirical, scholarly evidence to support your proposed project (CO 4), and (c) communicate your information in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO 5).
Note: You are completing this assignment as if you are the nurse executive. You are to decide whether you wish to focus on implementing your pathway to excellence or a shared governance model. You will choose one of the areas to implement either your pathway to excellence or your shared governance model. What elements would like to adopt and implement for your organization?
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points Possible: 200Requirements:
1. This paper will be graded on quality of paper information, use of citations, use of standard grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.
2. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in .docx.
3. Submit to the appropriate assignment area by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday of the week due. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A discussion topic.
4. The length of the paper is to be no greater than three pages, excluding title page and reference page.
5. APA format using the sixth edition manual is required in this assignment, including a title page and reference page. Use APA level 1 headings for the organizational structure of this assignment. Remember that the introduction does not carry a heading that labels it as a level heading in APA format. The first part of your paper is assumed to be the introduction. See the APA manual sixth edition for details. Use the suggested format and headings to organize your assignment.
a. Include introduction; include your which of the three areas of focus you have chosen (do not label as a heading in APA format)
b. Key components of pathway to excellence or shared-governance model
c. Supporting evidence
d. Importance to nursing examples
e. Conclusion
Preparing the paper
Note: Use the documents related to SLMC to assist in the completion of this assignment, as needed.
1. Include a clear introduction of your focus area (choose one of the three above) in the introduction paragraph, including a sentence that states the purpose of your paper.
2. Clearly articulate key components (at least two) of either your pathway to excellence or your shared-governance model project to be implemented.
3. Include a minim.
LegalRegulatory Issue AssignmentGuidelines with Scoring Rubric.docxcroysierkathey
Legal/Regulatory Issue Assignment
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) identify and articulate key concepts of your legal/regulatory issue in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO4), (b) discuss strategies to reduce costs and improve quality of health related to your issue (CO3), and (c) provide empirical, scholarly evidence to support your proposed plan (CO5).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.
(CO3) Appraise the effects of strategies to reduce costs and improve the quality and safety of healthcare. (PO1 & PO4)
(CO4) Organize legal and regulatory components of healthcare strategies to promote safety and quality care. (PO1 & PO4)
(CO5) Synthesize and communicate research findings to promote quality improvement and safety in healthcare. (PO1& PO4)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5
(Note: This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin (TII) through the Chamberlain assignment Dropbox.)
Total Points Possible: 200Requirements:
1. This paper will be graded on quality of information, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.
2. Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word, which is the required format for all Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”
3. Submit to the appropriate CCN Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday of the week due. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A Discussion topic.
4. The length of the paper is to be approximately three pages, excluding the title page and reference list.
5. APA format (6th edition) is required in this assignment, including a title page and reference page. Use APA level 1 headings for the organizational structure of this assignment. Remember that the introduction does not carry a heading that labels it as a level heading in APA format. The first part of your paper is assumed to be the introduction. See APA manual for details. See resource under Course Resources, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers.” Use the suggested format and headings to organize your assignment.
a. Include introduction (do not label as a heading in APA format)
b. Steps Related to Legal/Regulatory Issue
c. State-Board Recovery Program
d. Strategies
e. Supporting Evidence
f. Conclusion
Preparing the paper
As the nurse executive of a healthcare organization, it was reported to you that one of your nurses may be chemically impaired (legal/regulatory issue) and has allegedly been taking drugs from the unit. This nurse also had two recent medication errors in the past week. Discuss the steps you would take to validate this allegation and how you would proceed after the allegation was confirmed to be true.
1. Clearly introduce your legal/regulatory issue in the introduction paragraph; including a sentence tha ...
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NR 506 Week 1 Discussion The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing
NR 506 Week 2 Discussion Policy-Priority Selection
NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates Michigan)
NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Bicycle Helmet Policy)
For more course tutorials visit
www.newtonhelp.com
NR 506 Week 1 Discussion The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing
NR 506 Week 2 Discussion Policy-Priority Selection
NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Vaccination Rates Michigan)
NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue (Bicycle Helmet Policy)
NR 506 Week 4 Discussion Challenges in Lobbying Strategies
ACC202 - Management AccountingTrimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT.docxbartholomeocoombs
ACC202 - Management Accounting
Trimester 3 2018 GROUP ASSIGNMENT
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Student Id Number Student Name
Question
Student Mark
Total Assignment
/100
Assessment Mark (out of 20)
/20
Overview
Group Assignment: 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor)
Nature of Assignment: Essay (2000 – 2500 words)
Date Due: Week 10(Friday 10pm)
Worth: 20%
Submission Method: via Moodle / Turnitin (printed copy to Tutor if requested by Tutor)
Instructions
· This is a Group Assignment of 3-5 members (or as agreed with your Tutor). The groups must be finalised prior to the Mid-trimester test in Week 6.
· Write each of your Student Names and Numbers at the top of this page IN THE BOX PROVIDED. Ensure you identify who your group lead is.
The Group lead will be responsible for all correspondence with the Tutor as well as the assignment final submission.
1) Essay Questions:
What are mid-market innovators and what are the overall strategies and pricing approaches used by these innovators in order to develop their business. Why are mid-market innovators successful? Provide examples where appropriate.
Based on your analysis of mid-market innovators in the first part of the essay question, what challenges are there for incumbent companies?
2) Essay Structure:
The following structure is provided to assist you in developing your response.
1) Executive Summary (an overall statement of no more than 200-250 words outlining the topic, approach, summary of key findings and conclusion)
2) Introduction (this should state what the purpose of the report is, what Accounting theme is being explored, which company is being reviewed (if applicable), which standards / criteria are being applied etc.)
3) Literature Review (this is where you include a summary of the literature you reviewed to develop your understanding of the topic and formulate your recommendations)
4) Analysis (this is the main body)
5) Summary of Findings (this section highlights the key findings from your analysis)
6) Recommendations (this section summarises YOUR key recommendations based on your findings and emphasises your JUDGEMENT)
7) Conclusion (this section should reflect upon what you stated in the introduction i.e. what you have done and what you found. The conclusion is about closing the analysis and NOT introducing new material.)
8) Referencing (Harvard Anglia compliant)
You should also use the attached RUBRIC (refer section 3) to self-assess how well your Essay reaches the targeted outcomes. Please feel free to bring a draft copy to your Tutor to help you assess progress.
3. Analysis Rubric
Criteria
HD (>95%)
HD (85-95%)
Distinction (75-84%)
Credit (65-74%)
Pass (50-64%)
Fail (40-50%)
Fail (<40%)
Executive Summary (5%)
Presented a logical and well-structured executive summary which clearly reflects the assignment requirements, .
Running head: TITLE IN ALL CAPS 1
TITLE IN ALL CAPS 4
Title of Paper
Student Name
Grand Canyon University
Title of Paper with no bold (no more than 75 words)
Introduce your main thesis here. [introduction to your paper paragraph].
Background (no more than 125 words) worth 5% of grade
This paragraph addresses why the proposed work is important in the field. In this section, provide the status quo of the relevant work field and identify a gap in knowledge or activities that must be filled to move the field forward.
Problem Statement (no more than 125 words) worth 5% of grade
Sufficient details should be given in this discussion (1) to make clear what the research problem is and exactly what has been accomplished; (2) to give evidence of your own competence in the field; and (3) to show why the previous work needs to be continued.
Purpose of the Change Proposal (no more than 125 words) worth 5% of grade
Place a testable, focused, clear, declarative statement of relationships between variables based on previous observations.
PICOT worth 5% of grade
PICO (T) components and question needs to be placed here.
Literature Search Strategy (no more than 75 words) worth 5% of grade
Here is the information you might want to include when describing your literature search process: Databases used, Search terms used, Details of your search equations, Selection or exclusion criteria, Additional search methods, Number of results found, Final number of documents used and Types of documents used.
Evaluation of Literature (no more than 200 words) worth 5% of grade
Literature reviews should be selective and critical. Reviewers do not want to read through a voluminous working bibliography; they want to know the pertinent works and your evaluation of them. Discussions of work done by others should therefore lead the reader to a clear impression of how you will be building upon what has already been done and how your work differs from theirs. It is important to establish what is original in your approach (innovative), what circumstances have changed since related work was done, or what is unique about the time and place of the proposed research.
Applicable Change or Nursing Theory Utilized (no more than 150 words) worth 5% of grade
To write this paragraph you must choose a Nursing theory and/or Framework. After choosing your theory and/or framework you will talk to how it Provides a structure for the study, Provides the rationale for the predictions of the relationships between the variables, GUIDEs and directs the study and Helps make sense of meaning of the study (meaningful interpretation).
Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (no more than 200 words) worth 5% of grade
Implementation ...
Similar to NR 505 Effective Communication - tutorialrank.com (20)
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
1. NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
Analysis and Application of Clinical
Practice Guidelines & Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide an opportunity for students
to apply and disseminate information based on practice summaries. The
most common type of practice summary in healthcare is the clinical
practice guideline (CPG).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing
and related disciplines (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9); and
(CO 6) Utilize the principles of evidence-based practice to propose
strategies that can address nursing issues (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9).
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7
2. Total Points Possible:200 Points
Requirements:
Through this assignment, the student will
Develop summary of a clinical practice guideline. (COs 3, 6)
Preparing the paper
You will develop a summary that you could use within an evidence-
basedpractice (EBP) committee or related venue to share with your
colleagues. This paper will be 2-4 pages in length.
Select a clinical practice guidelines that addresses an issue pertinent to
your practice setting.
Search the literature and evidence-based practice websites and databases
to find a recent clinical practice guideline (no more than 5 years) related
to the issue you select. The course Webliography provides websites
where you can find clinical practice guidelines, but there are many
others available in specialty-organization websites.
Analyze and critique the clinical practice guideline. Use the Clinical
Practice Guideline Summary Template in Course Resources to develop
your paper. Components include:
o scope and purpose of the clinical practice guidelines;
o stakeholder involvement;
o rigor of development;
o clarity and presentation
o applicability
3. o editorial independence
Attach URL address of the Clinical Practice Guidelines on the reference
page of your paper.
Note: Thetemplateisan outline to assist you in setting up your paper so
you will be sure to address those topics in your paper in addition to other
information to meet the criteria for this assignment. Your paper should
be in APA 6th ed format. Do not copy and paste the template into your
paper.
The summary sheetis amended from the AGREE instrument on page
200 of Melnyk&Fineout-Overholt (2015). Your summaryshould be
approximately 5–6 pages long (Paper lengths do not include cover page
or reference page(s).
Category Points % Description
Scope and Purpose 25 12.5 Describes the scope and purpose of the
document. Includes the health question(s) covered by the guideline
Stakeholder Involvement 25 12.5 Describes the stakeholder involvement
in the development of the document. Identifies the target population.
Rigor of Development 25 12.5 Critiques the rigor of the development of
the document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the
guideline. Include level of evidence of the studies used to develop the
guideline.
Clarity & presentation (Recommendations) 25 12.5 Provides thekey
recommendations of the document. Discusses different options for
managing the condition or issue in the guideline.
Application 25 12.5 Identifies facilitators, barriers, costs, and outcome
measurement for application of the document.. Identifies key monitoring
and/or auditing criteria (outcomes)
4. Editorial Independence 25 12.5 Discusses conflict of interest and how
competing interests of the CPG group members recorded and addressed.
Summary 25 12.5 Summarizes how the CPG answers the key clinical
questions presented in the CPG. Discusses how the student, as the
advanced practice nurse, would apply the CPG in practice.
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling 10 5 No more than 2
errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling.
APA 6th Edition 10 5 No more than 2 APA 6thedition errors.
Attach pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guidelines 5 2.5 A pdf copy of
the Clinical Practice Guidelines submitted.
Total 200 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the
above requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance
Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of performance
Meets
(80%)
5. Competent or satisfactory level of performance
Needs Improvement
(38%)
Poor or failing level of performance
Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of performance
ContentPossible Points = 175 Points
Scope and Purpose 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points
Describes the scope and purpose of the document. Includes the health
question(s) covered by the guideline Describes the scope and purpose of
the document but has occasional missing information. Describes the
scope and purpose of the document with a minimal amount of
information presented. Weakly describes the scope and purpose of the
document. Does not include the scope or purpose of the health question
covered by the guideline.
Stakeholder Involvement 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0
Points
Describes all of the stakeholders involvement in the development of the
document. Identifies the target population Describes the stakeholder
involvement in the development of the document with occasional
information missing. Describes the stakeholder involvement in the
development of the document with a minimal amount of information
presented. Does not describe the stakeholder involvement in the
development of the document OR does not identify the target population.
6. Does not describe the stakeholder involvement in the development of the
document AND does not identify the target population.
Rigor of Development 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points
Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the
systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes level of
evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Elaborates on
rigor of development. Critiques the rigor of the development of the
document. Describes the systematic methods used to develop the
guideline. Includes the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop
the guidelines. Some occasional important information is missing.
Critiques the rigor of the development of the document. Describes the
systematic methods used to develop the guideline. Includes the levels of
evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Provides a
minimal amount of information. Does not critique the rigor of the
development of the document. Does not describe the systematic methods
used to develop the guideline. ORDoes not include the levels of
evidence of the studies used to develop the guidelines. Does not critique
the rigor of the development of the document. Does not describe the
systematic methods used to develop the guideline. ANDDoes not
include the levels of evidence of the studies used to develop the
guidelines.
Clarity & Presentation
(Recommendations)
25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points
Provides theall key recommendations of the document. Discusses
different options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the
guideline. Elaborates on the clarity and presentation of the
recommendations. Provides thekey recommendations of the document.
7. Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue
addressed in the guideline. Missing some occasional important
information.
Provides thekey recommendations of the document.
Discusses different options for managing the condition or issue
addressed in the guideline. Briefly elaborates on the clarity and
presentation of the recommendations.
Does not provide or provide thekey recommendations of the document.
ORDoes not discuss different options for managing the condition or
issue addressed in the guideline. Does not provide or provide thekey
recommendations of the document. ANDDoes not discuss different
options for managing the condition or issue addressed in the guideline.
Application 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points
Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome
measurement for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring
or auditing criteria (outcomes). Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or
potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the
document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).
Some occasional important information is missing. Briefly Identifies
facilitators, barriers (real or potential), costs, and outcome measurement
for application of the document. Identifies key monitoring or auditing
criteria (outcomes). Does not Identify facilitators, barriers (real or
potential), costs, and outcome measurement for application of the
document. ORDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria
(outcomes). Does not Identifies facilitators, barriers (real or potential),
costs, and outcome measurement for application of the document.
ANDDoes not identify key monitoring or auditing criteria (outcomes).
Editorial Independence 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points
8. Discusses conflict of interest of group members. Discusses how
competing interests of the CPG group members are recorded and
addressed. Addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from
influencing the content of the guideline. Discusses conflict of interest of
group members. Discusses how competing interests of the CPG group
members are recorded and addressed. Addresses how the views of the
funding body are kept from influencing the content of the guideline.
Some occasional important information is missing. Briefly discusses
conflict of interest of group members. Briefly discusses how competing
interests of the CPG group members are recorded and addressed. Briefly
addresses how the views of the funding body are kept from influencing
the content of the guideline. Does not discuss conflict of interest of
group members. Does not discuss how competing interests of the CPG
group members are recorded and addressed. ORDoes not address how
the views of the funding body are kept from influencing the content of
the guideline. Does not discuss conflict of interest of group members.
Does not discuss how competing interests of the CPG group members
are recorded and addressed. AND
Does not address how the views of the funding body are kept from
influencing the content of the guideline.
Summary 25 Points 22 Points 20Points 10 Points 0 Points
Summarizes the paper. Discusses whether or not the CPG answers the
key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG and elaborates. Discusses
how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in
practice with specific examples. Summarizes the paper. Discusses
whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in
the CPG. Discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will
apply the CPG in practice. Some occasional important information is
missing. Briefly summarizes the paper. Briefly discusses whether or not
the CPG answers the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG.
Briefly discusses how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will
apply the CPG in practice. Does not summarize the paper. Does not
9. discuss whether or not the CPG answers the key clinical question(s)
presented in the CPG. ORDoes not discuss how the student, as the
advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in practice. Does not
summarize the paper. Does not discuss whether or not the CPG answers
the key clinical question(s) presented in the CPG.ANDDoes not discuss
how the student, as the advance practice nurse, will apply the CPG in
practice.
Content Subtotal____/175 points
FormatPossible Points = 25 Points
Uses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling 10Points 9 Points 8
Points 4 Points 0 Points
No errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 1-2 errors in grammar, syntax,
or spelling 3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 5 or more errors in
grammar, syntax, or spelling 6 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or
spelling
APA 6th edition 10Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
No APA 6thedition errors 1-2 APA 6thedition errors 3-4 APA 6thedition
errors 5 APA 6thedition errors 6 or more APA 6thedition
errorsORTurnitin similarity percentage on student written work is higher
than 24%.
Attach pdf copy of the Clinical Practice Guideline 5 Points 0 Points
Pdf file of the Clinical Practice Guideline attached No pdf file of the
Clinical Practice Guideline attached
Format Subtotal____/25 points
Total Points_____/200 points
10. *******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 1 Discussion
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 1 Discussion
Write a quantitative research question using the PICO(T) model about a
health or safety issue observed in the Ironridge or Summerville
community or your practice setting.Conducta search of the literature for
the quantitative research question. (Remember you can use this topic and
quantitative research article as part of your Research Summary Table
assignment).Provide a brief summary of your quantitative research
article.
You will not be able to see other’s posts for this forum until you have
posted your response to the threaded discussion thread.
*******************************************************8
11. NR 505 Week 2 Discussion
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 2 Discussion
Review the differences in predictive and prescriptive studies and select a
predictive or prescriptive article that you found in your literature search.
What are the independent variables (IV), dependent variables (DV), and
mediating variables (MVs) that you find in the article? How do
determining IVs, DVs, and MVs help you discern the theory tested in
the research? In your particular article, what risk factors are identified,
or what recommendations are provided?
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 3 Discussion Plan A Qualitative Study
12. For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 3 Discussion Plan A Qualitative Study
Plan a Qualitative Study
Write a qualitative research question using the PICO(T) model using the
P (population), I (abstract concept), O (outcome), and T (time) from the
PICO(T) model about an issue from your practice setting. Conduct a
search of the literature for a qualitative research article that would
answer your qualitative research question. What qualitative research
design (Phenomenology, Grounded Theory, Ethnography) did you select
and why? Provide a summary of the study. How will you make sure that
the information you obtain is trustworthy? How is trustworthiness in
qualitative research similar and different from reliability and validity?
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 3 Research Summary Table
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
13. NR 505 Week 3 Research Summary Table
Research Summary Table
Guidelines with Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is for the student to learn to assimilate,
analyze, critique, and summarize original research articles. In other
words, select a report of a single, original study.
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
(CO 2) Formulate and analyze nursing/clinical problems related to
nursing and other disciplines. (PO 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing
and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3
Total Points Possible: 165 Points
Requirements
Through this assignment, the student will
14. 1. Conduct a systematic search of relevant databases to find research-
based evidence related to a nursing problem (CO 2);
2. Construct a summary table of four peer-reviewedquantitativesingle
original studies, indicating the purpose, sample, design/level of evidence,
findings, and limitations of each (CO 3); and
3. Summarize the findings of the four studies as a whole (CO 3).
Preparing the Table
Conduct a PICO(T) search on the nursing problem related to your
practice setting.Select the four most recent peer-reviewed studiesthat
describe original research in a single study (do not select a meta-analysis,
systematic review of research, or integrative literature review). Refer to
the Types of Articles Found in the Nursing and Healthcaredocument in
the Course Resource section to make sure that you are using the correct
document.
Construct a table summarizing the four most credible and recent studies,
using the Research Summary template on the next page (also found in
Course Resource Section). Analyze each article and provide the
following information in brief format: purpose of the study; type of
sample and number of participants; design of the study, along with the
level of evidence; findings of the study; and limitations of the study.
Preparing the Summary
15. Briefly (2-4 pages; not including cover page and reference page(s))
summarize the results of the four studies as a whole. Follow this outline:
I. In a short paragraph, restate your research question and describe your
search strategy. (10 points)
II. Analysis of the designs used in the studies presented in your research
summary table. (10 points)
III. Where do these studies fall on the LevelsofEvidence table? What is
the significance of this information?(10 points)
IV. Based on these studies, what are the findings? What is the answer to
the research question?How well do the studies answer or fail to answer
the question? Provide rationale to support your answer.(10 points)
V. Howwaseachsample selected and how many participants in the
studies. Is this number adequate? Why or why not? (10 points)
VI. Overall, what are the limitations of the study, and how can these
limitations be overcome in subsequent studies? (10 points)
VII. Based on these findings, is the evidence that you found on your
topic strong enough to suggest a change in practice or an idea for
practice? Why or why not?Please provide a rationale for your
answer.(10 points)
Provide your references, formatted in APA style, after the summary.
Include the doi number for each article. Submit a permalink of each
article you have chosen for this assignment (directions on how to obtain
a permalink are located in the Course Resource section).
Instructions for setting up your paper in APA 6th edition format.
Look at the example document for this assignment. Start your paper as
you would other APA 6thedition format professional papers. Copy and
16. paste the table into your APA paper. This should allow your paper to
remain in a vertical format. Your paper should be one document.
Research Summary Table (template provided in separate document)
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion
What are the various types of sampling, along with their advantages and
disadvantages? As we think about sampling and ethical practices, review
these two documents on ethical issues in research:
Tuskegee syphilis study
at.cdc.gov/tuskegee/”>http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/
17. An overview of questionable studies: Resnik, D. (2012). Research ethics
timeline (1932-present). Retrieved
from.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm”>htt
p://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/timeline/index.cfm
What are the implications of this information with respect to the
recruitment of human subjects in a study related to your chosen issue?
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 5 Critique Of Systematic Research Review
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 5 Critique Of Systematic Research Review
Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR)
Guidelineswith Scoring Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to provide students with practice in
identifying, reading, and critiquing systematic research reviews related
18. to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary of evidence,
typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on a particular topic,
that uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) for identifying,
appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a specific clinical
question and draw conclusions about the data gathered
(Melnyk&Fineout-Overholt,2011, p.582).
Course Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to
(CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing
and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
(CO 4) Compare and critique quantitative and qualitative designs and
methodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5
Total Points Possible:175 Points
Requirements:
1. Choose an SRR that pertains to your practice setting.Describe the
relevance of the nursingresearch problem addressed in a SRR to practice.
(CO 3, 6)
2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR,
specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6)
3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.
(CO 6)
4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the
SRR. (CO 3, 6)
19. 5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your
current practice andfuture research. (CO 3, 6)
6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate a true
SRR for this assignment.
7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages (not including cover page
and reference page(s).
Preparing the paper
Consult your faculty member if you are uncertain about whether your
article is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affected because you
will not be able to address all of the above objectives.
Important: Submit a copy of the systematic research review that you are
critiquing as a separate document before submitting your paper.This will
help Turnitin from returning a high similarity percentage on your written
work. Remember to keep Turnitin similarity to 24% or less or you will
be deducted points on APA.
References
Melnyk, B.M., &Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011).Evidence-based practice in
nursing &healthcare(2nded.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters
Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams,& Wilkins.
Turnitin®
This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin.You learned about
Turnitin in your NR500 course, so you should be familiar with how to
20. access it. Additionally, you will find an instructional announcement
about Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.
Category Points % Description
Describes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRR to
practice. 25 14.28 Fully describes the relevance of the research problem
Critiques the research rigor of the studies used in the SRR (see lesson’s
levels of evidence). 25 14.28 Fully critiques the rigor of the studies used
in the SRR
Critiques the levels of evidence, specifically the designs of the studies
included in the SRR. 25 14.28 Fully critiques the levels of evidence of
the studies included in the SRR
Critiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued.
25 14.28 Fully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented
and critiqued
Describes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR.
25 14.28 Fully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized
in the SRR
Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current
practice and future research 25 14.28 Critiques the conclusions of the
SRR, with implications for current practice andfuture research
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling reflect format written work. 10 5.71
Grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with
rules for formal written work.
APA formatting 10 5.71 APA formatting is correct
21. Submit a copy of the systematic research article you are critiquing. 5
2.85 Submits a copy of the permalink of the systematic research article
that you are critiquing
175 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above
requirements.
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 5 Discussion Inferential Statistics
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 5 Discussion
Inferential Statistics
Complete a PICO(T) search on a topic that pertains to your practice
setting. Select one of the articles from your search. Identify the
descriptive statistics. Then describe the inferential tests that were used in
the article (in other words, t-tests and chi-squares). Given the p-values
22. related to the tests, how do you interpret the results? Are they
statistically significant, also clinically significant? What are the
recommendations based on this paper? Share some alternate
explanations (mediating or intervening variables) for the results of the
study. If your chosen study does not contain inferential tests, then
choose a different article that does contain inferential tests so you can
participate in the discussion.
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 6 Discussion Evidence Based Models
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 6 Discussion Evidence Based Models
Evidence-Based Models
Read the box above about Mr. Lowell and his facility. As an advanced
practice nurse, you will looking at various evidence based practice
models and choosing two of them to compare and contrast here. After
you compare and contrast them, discuss which one you would
23. recommend to this facility and why? Remember to support your posts
with scholarly research in APA 6th ed format.
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 7 Discussion Quality, Safety, and Costs
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 7 Discussion Quality, Safety, and Costs
Quality, Safety, and Costs
Class, this week I would like for you to think about a patient scenario
related to our Summerville scenario. Mr. Lowell is especially concerned
about a costly high infection rate in surgical patients at St. Louis
Medical Center, along with a lack of concern about patient’s
psychological needs. He has read about the efforts of the QSEN Institute
(.org/”>http://qsen.org) to promote quality and safety. He was surprised
to see that patient concerns are inherent in the quality improvement
conversation. Place yourself in the role of nurse educator to help the new
24. staff education director and the clinical practice council study both
problems. How would you explain the relationships among quality,
safety, and costs to the director and staff? How would you demonstrate
the importance of nursing care in addressing this issue? What outcome
variables would you recommend?
*******************************************************8
NR 505 Week 8 Discussion
For more course tutorials visit
www.tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Week 8 Discussion
What specific skills and knowledge that you gained through this course
will be most important as you plan and implement your practicum
project? Describe a concrete way in which you anticipate using these
skills and knowledge.
*******************************************************8