SlideShare a Scribd company logo
2
                3       5
        1   2                                3

                    4
                                9
                        6       8
                            7

                                5

                                    4
                            3

                                2       5



Subsidence: 1906-1978               1


                                            Contour Interval: 1 ft
HGCSD 1992 Regulatory Plan Map


               7                   4   5

                         6

                             3     2

Area 1: 10% groundwater
Area 2: 20% groundwater
Area 3: 80% GW reduction by 1995       1
Area 4: 80% GW reduction by 2002
Area 5: 80% GW reduction by 2005
Area 6: 80% GW reduction by 2010
Area 7: 80% GW reduction by 2020
HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan Map


      3


          2


                  1
Key Elements - 1999 Regulatory Plan
       Regulatory Areas & Conversion Requirements

Areas 1 & 2 - Converted
   Area 1 GW reduced to 10% or less of TWD           3
   Area 2 GW reduced to 20% or less of TWD
                                                          2
Area 3                                                        1
   Reduce GW pumpage by 30% by 2010
   Reduce GW pumpage by 70% by 2020
   Reduce GW pumpage by 80% by 2030


Exemptions: Agricultural Irrigation & Economic Hardships

GRPs were due in 2003: 4 main Area 3 GRPS
(Houston, NHCRWA, WHCRWA & CHCRWA)

Disincentive Fee currently set at $5.00 / 1,000 gallons
Major Area 3 Groundwater Reduction Plans (GRPs)
 Regional Water Authorities and City of Houston

                                 Central


                   North



         West



                  Houston
Regional Groundwater Update

• Updates population and water demand
  projections
• Recalibrates the parameters of the
  groundwater and subsidence models

• HGSD/FBSD: Updated data and models to
  evaluate the 1999 & 2003 Regulatory Plans
  and make any necessary changes to the
  regulations for the upcoming decades
Regional Groundwater Update

• Study Area: Harris, Galveston, Fort
  Bend, Montgomery, and Brazoria Counties
• 5.8 million people in 2010 – nearly 25% of the
  State’s population
• Science and data to evaluate and potentially
  revise Regulatory Plans
• Regulations in study area drive the region’s
  water supply strategies
Diverse Technical Team
Key Stakeholders

             North Channel Water Authority




Central Harris County
Regional Water Authority
Reg Plan Update Project Components
                      STAKEHOLDER
                      INVOLVEMENT


Population and                  Subsidence   Regulatory
                 Groundwater                 Scenarios and
Water Demand                    Model
                 Model Update   Update       Plan Update
Projections




                    TWDB & REGION H
                     COORDINATION
Regional Groundwater Update

• TWDB Coordination
  – Project Participants and Team have met on
    multiple occasions with TWDB Planning Division
    and Groundwater Division Staff

  – Team provides updates and presents technical
    data

  – TWDB has provided valuable data and feedback
Regional Groundwater Update

• TWDB Coordination: Region H / GMA 14
  – Project’s County Population Projections to be
    used in Region H

  – Region H Water User Group (WUG) populations
    will be based on Project’s data

  – Project’s new Houston Area Groundwater Model
    (HAGM) to become regional model for Region H
    and Groundwater Management Area 14 (GMA 14)
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• Metrostudy
  – Short term: 2010 – 2020 annual increments
  – Quarterly housing surveys
  – Knowledge of future housing development
  – Considers regional economic outlook, quality of
    schools, current and future transportation
    planning, etc.



                                                15
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• University of Houston Center for Public
  Policy
  – Long term: 2030 – 2070 decadal
  – Models historical patterns in job creation and
    employment sub-centers statistically
  – Projects population based on long term
    forecast of economic growth and number and
    location of future jobs

                                                 16
POPULATION & DEMAND
PROJECTIONS
• Tract Level
  Projections
  – 1,039 tracts in 5
    primary counties




                        17
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• Distributed to
  Census Blocks
  – H-GAC land use
    data
  – 114,200 blocks
    in 5 primary
    counties




                         18
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• Other Boundary
  Conditions used in
  developing projections
  – MUDs
  – Cities
  – Regional Water
    Authorities
  – Regulatory Boundaries
  – Groundwater Model
    Grids


                            19
1 square mile grid
Regional Projection
                 Principal Counties: Brazoria, Ft Bend, Galveston, Harris, Montgomery
             12,000,000

                                                                                          10,939,614
             11,000,000
                                                                                                       11,087,333
             10,000,000                                                      9,744,351
                                                                                                10,188,115
Population




              9,000,000                                           8,577,632          9,357,916

                                                      7,804,376        8,627,807
              8,000,000
                                          6,934,871       7,635,834
              7,000,000
                          5,738,055           6,674,886
              6,000,000
                              5,738,055
              5,000,000
                      2000     2010         2020       2030           2040         2050       2060       2070       2080

                                                                   Year
                          RWP2011           TWDB ADJUSTED                 REGIONAL GW UPDATE
                                                                                                                    21
Harris County
7,000,000
                                                                                      6,272,346
6,000,000
                                                                               5,974,068

5,000,000                                4,707,870                5,376,099
                               4,092,459              5,058,144

4,000,000
                      3,400,578

3,000,000


2,000,000


1,000,000


       0
        1980   1990     2000      2010     2020      2030    2040      2050   2060   2070       2080

        1995 HGSD      RWP Adjusted 04-11            H-GAC        Regional Groundwater Update
Galveston County
500,000                                                                                 465,193
                                                                              447,126
450,000
                                                             403,820
400,000
                                           343,570
350,000                                              377,373
                                 291,309
300,000
                      250,158
250,000

200,000

150,000

100,000

 50,000

     0
      1980     1990       2000      2010   2020      2030      2040    2050    2060     2070      2080

          1995 HGSD        RWP Adjusted 04-11        H-GAC        Regional Groundwater Update
Fort Bend County
2,000,000
                                                                                          1,755,164
1,800,000

1,600,000
                                                                1,259,307          1,583,782
1,400,000

1,200,000                                        1,095,123

1,000,000                              881,966

 800,000
                                585,375
 600,000
                   354,452
 400,000

 200,000

       0
            1990    2000     2005    2010   2020    2030     2035   2040    2050   2060    2070

        1995 HGSD       RWP Adjusted 04-11         H-GAC       Regional Groundwater Update
Montgomery County
2,500,000


                                                                                        1,946,063
2,000,000

                                                                               1,576,135
1,500,000
                                                                     1,267,916

                                                            1,019,278
1,000,000
                                                    811,252
                                          627,917
                                455,746
 500,000
                      293,768


       0
        1980   1990    2000      2010      2020      2030     2040      2050     2060      2070     2080

        1995 HGSD     RWP Adjusted 04-11            H-GAC        Regional Groundwater Update
Brazoria County
700,000
                                                                                       648,568

                                                                             581,368
600,000
                                                                   519,696
500,000                                                     463,886


400,000                                   359,935        437,637
                                                    411,387
                                313,166
300,000
                      241,767

200,000


100,000


     0
      1980     1990    2000      2010     2020      2030    2040    2050      2060      2070     2080

          1995 HGSD     RWP Adjusted 04-11          H-GAC       Regional Groundwater Update
POPULATION BY HGSD REGULATORY AREA
4,000,000
                                                                                           3,528,168
3,500,000                                                                      3,382,481
                                                                   3,233,836
                                                       3,076,529
                                           2,905,158
3,000,000
                               2,710,303
                                                                                           2,401,086
2,500,000          2,250,944                                                   2,259,472
                                                                   2,122,327
                                                       1,986,120
2,000,000                                  1,848,040
                               1,702,190
                   1,566,279
1,500,000

1,000,000                                                          749,774     779,391     808,575
                               639,326     682,429     717,406
                   566,921
 500,000

       -
            2000    2010         2020       2030        2040        2050        2060        2070       2080

                    HGSD_AREA_1               HGSD_AREA_2              HGSD_AREA_3
HGSD Area 3 Conversion
Scenarios

    Scenario 1                      30%
(No Conversion After 2010)   2000   2010   2020   2030     2040   2050   2060   2070



                                    30%    70%      80%
     Scenario 2
(Current Regulatory Plans)   2000   2010   2020   2030     2040   2050   2060   2070




                                    30%       60%        80%
     Scenario 3              2000   2010      2025
                                           2020  20302035
                                                        2040      2050   2060   2070




                                    30%       55%          80%
     Scenario 4              2000   2010   2020  2030
                                              2025         2040   2050   2060   2070
FBSD Area A Conversion
Comparisons

                                             No Conversion assumed
          Scenario 1
    (No Conversion After 2010)        2000   2010    2020   2030   2040   2050   2060   2070




                                               30%     60%
             Scenario 2
         (Current Regulatory Plans)   2000   2010 2020 2030
                                               2014 2025           2040   2050   2060   2070
Area A




                                               30%     50%     65%
            Scenario 3                2000   2010 2020 2030 2040
                                               2014 2025 2035             2050   2060   2070


                                               30%      50%
            Scenario 4                2000   2010 2020 2030
                                               2014 2025           2040   2050   2060   2070
FBSD Richmond/Rosenberg Sub-Area
Conversion Comparisons




                                                           30%   60%
Rich/Ros Sub-Area




                        Scenario 2
                    (Current Regulatory Plans)   2000   2010 2020 2030
                                                           2016 2025       2040   2050   2060   2070


                                                           30%   50%   65%
                       Scenario 3                2000   2010 2020 2030 2040
                                                           2016 2025 2035         2050   2060   2070


                                                                 30%
                      Scenario 4                 2000   2010   2020 2030
                                                                  2025     2040   2050   2060   2070
Scenario 1 - Growth Beyond 2010 on Groundwater
(No Additional Surface Water)

 • Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD)
     – No increase in surface water supply beyond 2010 conversions.
     – No assumed reductions in surface water supply and all future increases in water
       demand are met with groundwater (Areas 1, 2, and 3).
     – Does not include Area 3 2020 70% groundwater reductions or 2030 80%
       groundwater reductions.
     – Future growth beyond 2010 supplied by groundwater in Areas 1 and 2.
 • Fort Bend County (FBSD)
     – Assumes no conversions in 2014, 2016, or 2025. All future growth supplied with
       groundwater.
 • Montgomery County (LSGCD)
     – No groundwater reductions in Montgomery County.
 • Brazoria County (BCGCD)
     – No groundwater reductions in Brazoria County.
(CI 1.0 ft)




              SUBSIDENCE
Scenario 2 – Current Adopted Regulations
•   Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan)
     – Area 1 = 90% conversion
     – Area 2 = 80% conversion
     – Area 3 = 30% conversion current to 2019
     – Area 3 = 70% conversion 2020 to 2029
     – Area 3 = 80% conversion 2030 and beyond

•   Fort Bend County (FBSD 2003 Regulatory Plan)
     – Area A = 30% conversion 2014 to 2024
     – R/R Sub-Area = 30% conversion 2016 to 2024
     – Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 60% conversion 2025 and beyond
     – Area B remains on 100% groundwater.

•   Montgomery County (LSGCD 2009 Regulatory Plan)
     – 30% conversion in 2016 based on 2009 demands. Groundwater capped at 64,000 acre-feet per
       year for 2017 and beyond.

•   Brazoria County (BCGCD)
     – No groundwater reduction regulations adopted in Brazoria County.
SUBSIDENCE
Revised Scenario 3 – Modifications to Current
Adopted Regulations
•   Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan)
     – Area 1 = 90% conversion (same as Scenario 2)
     – Area 2 = 80% conversion (same as Scenario 2)
     – Area 3 = 30% conversion current to 2024
     – Area 3 = 60% conversion 2025 to 2034
     – Area 3 = 80% conversion 2035 and beyond

•   Fort Bend County (FBSD 2003 Regulatory Plan)
     – Area A = 30% conversion 2014 to 2024 (same as Scenario 2)
     – R/R Sub-Area = 30% conversion 2016 to 2024 (same as Scenario 2)
     – Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 50% conversion 2025 to 2034
     – Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 65% conversion 2035 and beyond
     – Area B remains on 100% groundwater (same as Scenario 2).

•   Montgomery County (LSGCD 2009 Regulatory Plan)
     – 30% conversion in 2016 based on 2009 demands. Groundwater capped at 64,000 acre-feet per year
       for 2017 and beyond (same as Scenario 2).

•   Brazoria County (BCGCD)
     – Assume City of Pearland (including ETJ) converts to 50% surface water by 2016 and beyond.
SUBSIDENCE
CI: 25 feet
CI: 25 feet
CI: 25 feet
CI: 25 feet
Subsidence Model PRESS Sites
Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in FBSD




   Area A             Area B             R/R
                                       Sub Area
Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in HGSD




                Area 1
Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in HGSD




                Area 2
Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in HGSD




                Area 3
Key Stakeholder Testimony for 2013 Plan
• Change to the 2025 Conversion date
  makes infrastructure construction
  achievable

• Plans for completion of the Luces
  Bayou Water Transfer will remain on
  schedule with already existing
  timetables
Key Stakeholder Testimony for 2013 Plan
• Change to the 2025 Conversion date
  makes future conversion costs more
  acceptable

• Results of changes outlined in Scenario
  3 do not create significant impact on
  future subsidence rates
Regulatory Plan
     2013




   Harris-Galveston
  Subsidence District
   1660 W. Bay Area Blvd.
   Friendswood TX 77546
       (281) 486-1105
    www.subsidence.org
Key Elements – HGSD 2013 Regulatory Plan

 • No change to Regulatory Area boundaries
 • No change to Areas 1 & 2 Regulations
    • Area 1 = 90% conversion
    • Area 2 = 80% conversion


                                3
                                    2
                                        1
Key Elements – HGSD 2013 Regulatory Plan
• Area 3 Regulations Updated
  • 30% conversion current to 2024
  • 60% conversion 2025 to 2034
  • 80% conversion 2035 and beyond

                         3
                             2
                                 1
Disincentive Fee


Disincentive Fee changed from
$5.00 to $7.00 per 1,000 gallons
Land-surface subsidence (1915 through 1917) – 2001 determined by GIS techniques in Harris County, Texas
       by Mark C. Kasmarek; 1906-2000 land-surface contours determined by Robert K. Gabrysch
AWBD January 26th 2013 - Harris-Galveston Subsidence District

More Related Content

Similar to AWBD January 26th 2013 - Harris-Galveston Subsidence District

State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...
State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...
State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...TXGroundwaterSummit
 
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal MissionJawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities
 
Statistical profile
Statistical profileStatistical profile
Statistical profilecarrieriddle
 
Statistical profile
Statistical profileStatistical profile
Statistical profilecarrieriddle
 
Water Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley Gage
Water Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley GageWater Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley Gage
Water Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley Gage
San Diego County Water Authority
 
Water Talks: Investments in Water Reliability
Water Talks: Investments in Water ReliabilityWater Talks: Investments in Water Reliability
Water Talks: Investments in Water Reliability
San Diego County Water Authority
 
Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future Overview
Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future OverviewWater Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future Overview
Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future Overview
San Diego County Water Authority
 
Agricultural budget
Agricultural budgetAgricultural budget
Agricultural budget
Narasimha Reddy Donthi
 
Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?
Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?
Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?
Texas Living Waters Project
 
Our Future Valley December 2 Presentation
Our Future Valley December 2 PresentationOur Future Valley December 2 Presentation
Our Future Valley December 2 Presentation
Lucas Warren
 
Understanding the Impact of Growth Plan Reforms
Understanding the Impact of Growth Plan ReformsUnderstanding the Impact of Growth Plan Reforms
Understanding the Impact of Growth Plan Reforms
Anne Kaufmann
 
Chamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentation
Chamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentationChamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentation
Chamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentationDavid Kelley, MBA
 
Forest carbon and safeguards in Acre
Forest carbon and safeguards in AcreForest carbon and safeguards in Acre
Forest carbon and safeguards in Acre
Pavel Jezek
 
Cippec Bahía Blanca
Cippec   Bahía BlancaCippec   Bahía Blanca
Cippec Bahía Blanca
Tobias Hutton
 
Transportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale Drilling
Transportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale DrillingTransportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale Drilling
Transportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale Drilling
preservationcombination
 
Update on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John Dupnik
Update on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John DupnikUpdate on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John Dupnik
Update on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John Dupnik
TWCA
 
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012Katie Madanat
 
Hydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve Jester
Hydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve JesterHydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve Jester
Hydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve JesterTXGroundwaterSummit
 
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and Beyond
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and BeyondMoving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and Beyond
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and Beyond
preservationcombination
 

Similar to AWBD January 26th 2013 - Harris-Galveston Subsidence District (20)

State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...
State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...
State Water Plan and RWPG Updates from the Groundwater Perspective, Carolyn B...
 
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal MissionJawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission
 
Statistical profile
Statistical profileStatistical profile
Statistical profile
 
Statistical profile
Statistical profileStatistical profile
Statistical profile
 
Water Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley Gage
Water Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley GageWater Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley Gage
Water Education Foundation San Diego Tour, by Kelley Gage
 
Water Talks: Investments in Water Reliability
Water Talks: Investments in Water ReliabilityWater Talks: Investments in Water Reliability
Water Talks: Investments in Water Reliability
 
Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future Overview
Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future OverviewWater Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future Overview
Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future Overview
 
Agricultural budget
Agricultural budgetAgricultural budget
Agricultural budget
 
Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?
Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?
Region K Water Plan Overview: What Role Does Water Conservation Play?
 
Our Future Valley December 2 Presentation
Our Future Valley December 2 PresentationOur Future Valley December 2 Presentation
Our Future Valley December 2 Presentation
 
Understanding the Impact of Growth Plan Reforms
Understanding the Impact of Growth Plan ReformsUnderstanding the Impact of Growth Plan Reforms
Understanding the Impact of Growth Plan Reforms
 
Chamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentation
Chamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentationChamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentation
Chamber of commerce retail strategy and market analysis presentation
 
Forest carbon and safeguards in Acre
Forest carbon and safeguards in AcreForest carbon and safeguards in Acre
Forest carbon and safeguards in Acre
 
Cippec Bahía Blanca
Cippec   Bahía BlancaCippec   Bahía Blanca
Cippec Bahía Blanca
 
Transportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale Drilling
Transportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale DrillingTransportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale Drilling
Transportation Impacts of Marcellus Shale Drilling
 
Update on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John Dupnik
Update on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John DupnikUpdate on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John Dupnik
Update on Groundwater-Related Activities at the TWDB - John Dupnik
 
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
Las Vegas Nevada Fact Sheet Jan-Mar 2012
 
Hydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve Jester
Hydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve JesterHydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve Jester
Hydraulic Fracturing - Oil and Gas Perspective, Steve Jester
 
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and Beyond
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and BeyondMoving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and Beyond
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act and Beyond
 
Health Benefit Options for GCDs, Julian Fontana, TML IEBP
Health Benefit Options for GCDs, Julian Fontana, TML IEBPHealth Benefit Options for GCDs, Julian Fontana, TML IEBP
Health Benefit Options for GCDs, Julian Fontana, TML IEBP
 

More from The Texas Network, LLC

WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017
WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017
WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017
The Texas Network, LLC
 
WHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIP
WHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIPWHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIP
WHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIP
The Texas Network, LLC
 
WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015
WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015
WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015
The Texas Network, LLC
 
TWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” Rule
TWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” RuleTWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” Rule
TWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” Rule
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Pass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal Challenges
Pass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal ChallengesPass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal Challenges
Pass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal Challenges
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Texas Water Development Board Update
Texas Water Development Board UpdateTexas Water Development Board Update
Texas Water Development Board Update
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Professional Ethics
Professional EthicsProfessional Ethics
Professional Ethics
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Groundwater Management GMA/GCD Panel
Groundwater Management GMA/GCD PanelGroundwater Management GMA/GCD Panel
Groundwater Management GMA/GCD Panel
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Methods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda Bay
Methods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda BayMethods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda Bay
Methods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda Bay
The Texas Network, LLC
 
The Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on Reuse
The Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on ReuseThe Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on Reuse
The Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on Reuse
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Texas Drought Over? (But then again…)
Texas Drought Over?  (But then again…)Texas Drought Over?  (But then again…)
Texas Drought Over? (But then again…)
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...
Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...
Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...
The Texas Network, LLC
 
SURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESS
SURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESSSURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESS
SURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESS
The Texas Network, LLC
 
RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT
RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT
RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT
The Texas Network, LLC
 
TWCA Speech – Rep. James Frank
TWCA Speech – Rep. James FrankTWCA Speech – Rep. James Frank
TWCA Speech – Rep. James Frank
The Texas Network, LLC
 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in TexasU.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Individual liability for Water Authority Board Members
Individual liability for Water Authority Board MembersIndividual liability for Water Authority Board Members
Individual liability for Water Authority Board Members
The Texas Network, LLC
 
From Projectile to Pump Station
From Projectile to Pump StationFrom Projectile to Pump Station
From Projectile to Pump Station
The Texas Network, LLC
 
The Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in Texas
The Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in TexasThe Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in Texas
The Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in Texas
The Texas Network, LLC
 
Pecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part II
Pecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part IIPecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part II
Pecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part II
The Texas Network, LLC
 

More from The Texas Network, LLC (20)

WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017
WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017
WHCRWA MUD directors' outreach workshop June 8, 2017
 
WHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIP
WHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIPWHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIP
WHCRWA APWA Presentation on CIP
 
WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015
WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015
WHCRWA Town Hall and Open House 2015
 
TWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” Rule
TWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” RuleTWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” Rule
TWCA Webinar - New “Waters of the United States” Rule
 
Pass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal Challenges
Pass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal ChallengesPass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal Challenges
Pass the Salt: Desalination Brine Disposal Challenges
 
Texas Water Development Board Update
Texas Water Development Board UpdateTexas Water Development Board Update
Texas Water Development Board Update
 
Professional Ethics
Professional EthicsProfessional Ethics
Professional Ethics
 
Groundwater Management GMA/GCD Panel
Groundwater Management GMA/GCD PanelGroundwater Management GMA/GCD Panel
Groundwater Management GMA/GCD Panel
 
Methods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda Bay
Methods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda BayMethods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda Bay
Methods to promote freshwater inflow to East Matagorda Bay
 
The Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on Reuse
The Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on ReuseThe Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on Reuse
The Economic Power of Water - GE’s Focus on Reuse
 
Texas Drought Over? (But then again…)
Texas Drought Over?  (But then again…)Texas Drought Over?  (But then again…)
Texas Drought Over? (But then again…)
 
Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...
Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...
Evaluating the Relative Cost of Service from Publicly Funded vs. Privately Fi...
 
SURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESS
SURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESSSURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESS
SURFACE WATER ISSUES IN THE GMA 7 JPINT PLANNING PROCESS
 
RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT
RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT
RESPONDING TO A WATER SUPPLY CONTAMINATION EVENT
 
TWCA Speech – Rep. James Frank
TWCA Speech – Rep. James FrankTWCA Speech – Rep. James Frank
TWCA Speech – Rep. James Frank
 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in TexasU.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Infrastructure Strategies in Texas
 
Individual liability for Water Authority Board Members
Individual liability for Water Authority Board MembersIndividual liability for Water Authority Board Members
Individual liability for Water Authority Board Members
 
From Projectile to Pump Station
From Projectile to Pump StationFrom Projectile to Pump Station
From Projectile to Pump Station
 
The Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in Texas
The Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in TexasThe Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in Texas
The Future is Now: The Rapidly Evolving Landscape of ASR in Texas
 
Pecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part II
Pecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part IIPecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part II
Pecos/Devils River Watershed Projects Part II
 

AWBD January 26th 2013 - Harris-Galveston Subsidence District

  • 1.
  • 2. 2 3 5 1 2 3 4 9 6 8 7 5 4 3 2 5 Subsidence: 1906-1978 1 Contour Interval: 1 ft
  • 3. HGCSD 1992 Regulatory Plan Map 7 4 5 6 3 2 Area 1: 10% groundwater Area 2: 20% groundwater Area 3: 80% GW reduction by 1995 1 Area 4: 80% GW reduction by 2002 Area 5: 80% GW reduction by 2005 Area 6: 80% GW reduction by 2010 Area 7: 80% GW reduction by 2020
  • 4. HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan Map 3 2 1
  • 5. Key Elements - 1999 Regulatory Plan Regulatory Areas & Conversion Requirements Areas 1 & 2 - Converted Area 1 GW reduced to 10% or less of TWD 3 Area 2 GW reduced to 20% or less of TWD 2 Area 3 1 Reduce GW pumpage by 30% by 2010 Reduce GW pumpage by 70% by 2020 Reduce GW pumpage by 80% by 2030 Exemptions: Agricultural Irrigation & Economic Hardships GRPs were due in 2003: 4 main Area 3 GRPS (Houston, NHCRWA, WHCRWA & CHCRWA) Disincentive Fee currently set at $5.00 / 1,000 gallons
  • 6. Major Area 3 Groundwater Reduction Plans (GRPs) Regional Water Authorities and City of Houston Central North West Houston
  • 7.
  • 8. Regional Groundwater Update • Updates population and water demand projections • Recalibrates the parameters of the groundwater and subsidence models • HGSD/FBSD: Updated data and models to evaluate the 1999 & 2003 Regulatory Plans and make any necessary changes to the regulations for the upcoming decades
  • 9. Regional Groundwater Update • Study Area: Harris, Galveston, Fort Bend, Montgomery, and Brazoria Counties • 5.8 million people in 2010 – nearly 25% of the State’s population • Science and data to evaluate and potentially revise Regulatory Plans • Regulations in study area drive the region’s water supply strategies
  • 11. Key Stakeholders North Channel Water Authority Central Harris County Regional Water Authority
  • 12. Reg Plan Update Project Components STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT Population and Subsidence Regulatory Groundwater Scenarios and Water Demand Model Model Update Update Plan Update Projections TWDB & REGION H COORDINATION
  • 13. Regional Groundwater Update • TWDB Coordination – Project Participants and Team have met on multiple occasions with TWDB Planning Division and Groundwater Division Staff – Team provides updates and presents technical data – TWDB has provided valuable data and feedback
  • 14. Regional Groundwater Update • TWDB Coordination: Region H / GMA 14 – Project’s County Population Projections to be used in Region H – Region H Water User Group (WUG) populations will be based on Project’s data – Project’s new Houston Area Groundwater Model (HAGM) to become regional model for Region H and Groundwater Management Area 14 (GMA 14)
  • 15. POPULATION PROJECTIONS • Metrostudy – Short term: 2010 – 2020 annual increments – Quarterly housing surveys – Knowledge of future housing development – Considers regional economic outlook, quality of schools, current and future transportation planning, etc. 15
  • 16. POPULATION PROJECTIONS • University of Houston Center for Public Policy – Long term: 2030 – 2070 decadal – Models historical patterns in job creation and employment sub-centers statistically – Projects population based on long term forecast of economic growth and number and location of future jobs 16
  • 17. POPULATION & DEMAND PROJECTIONS • Tract Level Projections – 1,039 tracts in 5 primary counties 17
  • 18. POPULATION PROJECTIONS • Distributed to Census Blocks – H-GAC land use data – 114,200 blocks in 5 primary counties 18
  • 19. POPULATION PROJECTIONS • Other Boundary Conditions used in developing projections – MUDs – Cities – Regional Water Authorities – Regulatory Boundaries – Groundwater Model Grids 19
  • 21. Regional Projection Principal Counties: Brazoria, Ft Bend, Galveston, Harris, Montgomery 12,000,000 10,939,614 11,000,000 11,087,333 10,000,000 9,744,351 10,188,115 Population 9,000,000 8,577,632 9,357,916 7,804,376 8,627,807 8,000,000 6,934,871 7,635,834 7,000,000 5,738,055 6,674,886 6,000,000 5,738,055 5,000,000 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 Year RWP2011 TWDB ADJUSTED REGIONAL GW UPDATE 21
  • 22. Harris County 7,000,000 6,272,346 6,000,000 5,974,068 5,000,000 4,707,870 5,376,099 4,092,459 5,058,144 4,000,000 3,400,578 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 1995 HGSD RWP Adjusted 04-11 H-GAC Regional Groundwater Update
  • 23. Galveston County 500,000 465,193 447,126 450,000 403,820 400,000 343,570 350,000 377,373 291,309 300,000 250,158 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 1995 HGSD RWP Adjusted 04-11 H-GAC Regional Groundwater Update
  • 24. Fort Bend County 2,000,000 1,755,164 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,259,307 1,583,782 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,095,123 1,000,000 881,966 800,000 585,375 600,000 354,452 400,000 200,000 0 1990 2000 2005 2010 2020 2030 2035 2040 2050 2060 2070 1995 HGSD RWP Adjusted 04-11 H-GAC Regional Groundwater Update
  • 25. Montgomery County 2,500,000 1,946,063 2,000,000 1,576,135 1,500,000 1,267,916 1,019,278 1,000,000 811,252 627,917 455,746 500,000 293,768 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 1995 HGSD RWP Adjusted 04-11 H-GAC Regional Groundwater Update
  • 26. Brazoria County 700,000 648,568 581,368 600,000 519,696 500,000 463,886 400,000 359,935 437,637 411,387 313,166 300,000 241,767 200,000 100,000 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 1995 HGSD RWP Adjusted 04-11 H-GAC Regional Groundwater Update
  • 27. POPULATION BY HGSD REGULATORY AREA 4,000,000 3,528,168 3,500,000 3,382,481 3,233,836 3,076,529 2,905,158 3,000,000 2,710,303 2,401,086 2,500,000 2,250,944 2,259,472 2,122,327 1,986,120 2,000,000 1,848,040 1,702,190 1,566,279 1,500,000 1,000,000 749,774 779,391 808,575 639,326 682,429 717,406 566,921 500,000 - 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 HGSD_AREA_1 HGSD_AREA_2 HGSD_AREA_3
  • 28. HGSD Area 3 Conversion Scenarios Scenario 1 30% (No Conversion After 2010) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 30% 70% 80% Scenario 2 (Current Regulatory Plans) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 30% 60% 80% Scenario 3 2000 2010 2025 2020 20302035 2040 2050 2060 2070 30% 55% 80% Scenario 4 2000 2010 2020 2030 2025 2040 2050 2060 2070
  • 29. FBSD Area A Conversion Comparisons No Conversion assumed Scenario 1 (No Conversion After 2010) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 30% 60% Scenario 2 (Current Regulatory Plans) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2014 2025 2040 2050 2060 2070 Area A 30% 50% 65% Scenario 3 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2014 2025 2035 2050 2060 2070 30% 50% Scenario 4 2000 2010 2020 2030 2014 2025 2040 2050 2060 2070
  • 30. FBSD Richmond/Rosenberg Sub-Area Conversion Comparisons 30% 60% Rich/Ros Sub-Area Scenario 2 (Current Regulatory Plans) 2000 2010 2020 2030 2016 2025 2040 2050 2060 2070 30% 50% 65% Scenario 3 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2016 2025 2035 2050 2060 2070 30% Scenario 4 2000 2010 2020 2030 2025 2040 2050 2060 2070
  • 31. Scenario 1 - Growth Beyond 2010 on Groundwater (No Additional Surface Water) • Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD) – No increase in surface water supply beyond 2010 conversions. – No assumed reductions in surface water supply and all future increases in water demand are met with groundwater (Areas 1, 2, and 3). – Does not include Area 3 2020 70% groundwater reductions or 2030 80% groundwater reductions. – Future growth beyond 2010 supplied by groundwater in Areas 1 and 2. • Fort Bend County (FBSD) – Assumes no conversions in 2014, 2016, or 2025. All future growth supplied with groundwater. • Montgomery County (LSGCD) – No groundwater reductions in Montgomery County. • Brazoria County (BCGCD) – No groundwater reductions in Brazoria County.
  • 32. (CI 1.0 ft) SUBSIDENCE
  • 33. Scenario 2 – Current Adopted Regulations • Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan) – Area 1 = 90% conversion – Area 2 = 80% conversion – Area 3 = 30% conversion current to 2019 – Area 3 = 70% conversion 2020 to 2029 – Area 3 = 80% conversion 2030 and beyond • Fort Bend County (FBSD 2003 Regulatory Plan) – Area A = 30% conversion 2014 to 2024 – R/R Sub-Area = 30% conversion 2016 to 2024 – Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 60% conversion 2025 and beyond – Area B remains on 100% groundwater. • Montgomery County (LSGCD 2009 Regulatory Plan) – 30% conversion in 2016 based on 2009 demands. Groundwater capped at 64,000 acre-feet per year for 2017 and beyond. • Brazoria County (BCGCD) – No groundwater reduction regulations adopted in Brazoria County.
  • 35. Revised Scenario 3 – Modifications to Current Adopted Regulations • Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan) – Area 1 = 90% conversion (same as Scenario 2) – Area 2 = 80% conversion (same as Scenario 2) – Area 3 = 30% conversion current to 2024 – Area 3 = 60% conversion 2025 to 2034 – Area 3 = 80% conversion 2035 and beyond • Fort Bend County (FBSD 2003 Regulatory Plan) – Area A = 30% conversion 2014 to 2024 (same as Scenario 2) – R/R Sub-Area = 30% conversion 2016 to 2024 (same as Scenario 2) – Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 50% conversion 2025 to 2034 – Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 65% conversion 2035 and beyond – Area B remains on 100% groundwater (same as Scenario 2). • Montgomery County (LSGCD 2009 Regulatory Plan) – 30% conversion in 2016 based on 2009 demands. Groundwater capped at 64,000 acre-feet per year for 2017 and beyond (same as Scenario 2). • Brazoria County (BCGCD) – Assume City of Pearland (including ETJ) converts to 50% surface water by 2016 and beyond.
  • 42. Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in FBSD Area A Area B R/R Sub Area
  • 43. Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in HGSD Area 1
  • 44. Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in HGSD Area 2
  • 45. Subsidence Model PRESS Sites in HGSD Area 3
  • 46.
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.
  • 50. Key Stakeholder Testimony for 2013 Plan • Change to the 2025 Conversion date makes infrastructure construction achievable • Plans for completion of the Luces Bayou Water Transfer will remain on schedule with already existing timetables
  • 51. Key Stakeholder Testimony for 2013 Plan • Change to the 2025 Conversion date makes future conversion costs more acceptable • Results of changes outlined in Scenario 3 do not create significant impact on future subsidence rates
  • 52. Regulatory Plan 2013 Harris-Galveston Subsidence District 1660 W. Bay Area Blvd. Friendswood TX 77546 (281) 486-1105 www.subsidence.org
  • 53. Key Elements – HGSD 2013 Regulatory Plan • No change to Regulatory Area boundaries • No change to Areas 1 & 2 Regulations • Area 1 = 90% conversion • Area 2 = 80% conversion 3 2 1
  • 54. Key Elements – HGSD 2013 Regulatory Plan • Area 3 Regulations Updated • 30% conversion current to 2024 • 60% conversion 2025 to 2034 • 80% conversion 2035 and beyond 3 2 1
  • 55. Disincentive Fee Disincentive Fee changed from $5.00 to $7.00 per 1,000 gallons
  • 56.
  • 57. Land-surface subsidence (1915 through 1917) – 2001 determined by GIS techniques in Harris County, Texas by Mark C. Kasmarek; 1906-2000 land-surface contours determined by Robert K. Gabrysch