The document appears to be a technical report summarizing population projections, water demand projections, and proposed groundwater regulatory scenarios for the Houston-Galveston region through 2080. It includes:
1) Population projections at the census tract and block levels through 2080 for Harris, Galveston, Fort Bend, Montgomery, and Brazoria counties developed with Metrostudy and UH Center for Public Policy.
2) Four proposed groundwater regulatory scenarios for Harris-Galveston and Fort Bend counties, including maintaining current plans or modifying required groundwater conversions in some areas.
3) Analysis of proposed scenarios using groundwater and subsidence models to evaluate impacts on subsidence.
Presentation by Board Chair Michael T. Hogan at the May 31 Water Talks Forum. This is a summary of the Water Authority's diversification strategy and recent investments in supply reliability.
Board Chair Michael T. Hogan provides an overview of the Water Authority's investments in a reliable water supply and provides an overview of the evening's presentations. From the September Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future
Presentation by Board Chair Michael T. Hogan at the May 31 Water Talks Forum. This is a summary of the Water Authority's diversification strategy and recent investments in supply reliability.
Board Chair Michael T. Hogan provides an overview of the Water Authority's investments in a reliable water supply and provides an overview of the evening's presentations. From the September Water Talks: Water Rates: Funding a Reliable Future
Managing Cultural Resources in Water Infrastructure through the Framework of the TRWD/DWU IPL Project by: Mason D. Miller, M.A. AmaTerra Environmental, Inc. Austin, TX - Las Cruces, NM - TWCA Annual Convention 2015
Ronald T. Green, Ph.D., P.G., F. Paul Bertetti, P.G.,
and Nathanial Toll Geosciences and Engineering Division Southwest Research Institute® Presented on behalf of the Irrigation Panel - TWCA Annual Convention 2015
3. HGCSD 1992 Regulatory Plan Map
7 4 5
6
3 2
Area 1: 10% groundwater
Area 2: 20% groundwater
Area 3: 80% GW reduction by 1995 1
Area 4: 80% GW reduction by 2002
Area 5: 80% GW reduction by 2005
Area 6: 80% GW reduction by 2010
Area 7: 80% GW reduction by 2020
5. Key Elements - 1999 Regulatory Plan
Regulatory Areas & Conversion Requirements
Areas 1 & 2 - Converted
Area 1 GW reduced to 10% or less of TWD 3
Area 2 GW reduced to 20% or less of TWD
2
Area 3 1
Reduce GW pumpage by 30% by 2010
Reduce GW pumpage by 70% by 2020
Reduce GW pumpage by 80% by 2030
Exemptions: Agricultural Irrigation & Economic Hardships
GRPs were due in 2003: 4 main Area 3 GRPS
(Houston, NHCRWA, WHCRWA & CHCRWA)
Disincentive Fee currently set at $5.00 / 1,000 gallons
6. Major Area 3 Groundwater Reduction Plans (GRPs)
Regional Water Authorities and City of Houston
Central
North
West
Houston
7.
8. Regional Groundwater Update
• Updates population and water demand
projections
• Recalibrates the parameters of the
groundwater and subsidence models
• HGSD/FBSD: Updated data and models to
evaluate the 1999 & 2003 Regulatory Plans
and make any necessary changes to the
regulations for the upcoming decades
9. Regional Groundwater Update
• Study Area: Harris, Galveston, Fort
Bend, Montgomery, and Brazoria Counties
• 5.8 million people in 2010 – nearly 25% of the
State’s population
• Science and data to evaluate and potentially
revise Regulatory Plans
• Regulations in study area drive the region’s
water supply strategies
11. Key Stakeholders
North Channel Water Authority
Central Harris County
Regional Water Authority
12. Reg Plan Update Project Components
STAKEHOLDER
INVOLVEMENT
Population and Subsidence Regulatory
Groundwater Scenarios and
Water Demand Model
Model Update Update Plan Update
Projections
TWDB & REGION H
COORDINATION
13. Regional Groundwater Update
• TWDB Coordination
– Project Participants and Team have met on
multiple occasions with TWDB Planning Division
and Groundwater Division Staff
– Team provides updates and presents technical
data
– TWDB has provided valuable data and feedback
14. Regional Groundwater Update
• TWDB Coordination: Region H / GMA 14
– Project’s County Population Projections to be
used in Region H
– Region H Water User Group (WUG) populations
will be based on Project’s data
– Project’s new Houston Area Groundwater Model
(HAGM) to become regional model for Region H
and Groundwater Management Area 14 (GMA 14)
15. POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• Metrostudy
– Short term: 2010 – 2020 annual increments
– Quarterly housing surveys
– Knowledge of future housing development
– Considers regional economic outlook, quality of
schools, current and future transportation
planning, etc.
15
16. POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• University of Houston Center for Public
Policy
– Long term: 2030 – 2070 decadal
– Models historical patterns in job creation and
employment sub-centers statistically
– Projects population based on long term
forecast of economic growth and number and
location of future jobs
16
19. POPULATION PROJECTIONS
• Other Boundary
Conditions used in
developing projections
– MUDs
– Cities
– Regional Water
Authorities
– Regulatory Boundaries
– Groundwater Model
Grids
19
31. Scenario 1 - Growth Beyond 2010 on Groundwater
(No Additional Surface Water)
• Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD)
– No increase in surface water supply beyond 2010 conversions.
– No assumed reductions in surface water supply and all future increases in water
demand are met with groundwater (Areas 1, 2, and 3).
– Does not include Area 3 2020 70% groundwater reductions or 2030 80%
groundwater reductions.
– Future growth beyond 2010 supplied by groundwater in Areas 1 and 2.
• Fort Bend County (FBSD)
– Assumes no conversions in 2014, 2016, or 2025. All future growth supplied with
groundwater.
• Montgomery County (LSGCD)
– No groundwater reductions in Montgomery County.
• Brazoria County (BCGCD)
– No groundwater reductions in Brazoria County.
33. Scenario 2 – Current Adopted Regulations
• Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan)
– Area 1 = 90% conversion
– Area 2 = 80% conversion
– Area 3 = 30% conversion current to 2019
– Area 3 = 70% conversion 2020 to 2029
– Area 3 = 80% conversion 2030 and beyond
• Fort Bend County (FBSD 2003 Regulatory Plan)
– Area A = 30% conversion 2014 to 2024
– R/R Sub-Area = 30% conversion 2016 to 2024
– Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 60% conversion 2025 and beyond
– Area B remains on 100% groundwater.
• Montgomery County (LSGCD 2009 Regulatory Plan)
– 30% conversion in 2016 based on 2009 demands. Groundwater capped at 64,000 acre-feet per
year for 2017 and beyond.
• Brazoria County (BCGCD)
– No groundwater reduction regulations adopted in Brazoria County.
35. Revised Scenario 3 – Modifications to Current
Adopted Regulations
• Harris and Galveston Counties (HGSD 1999 Regulatory Plan)
– Area 1 = 90% conversion (same as Scenario 2)
– Area 2 = 80% conversion (same as Scenario 2)
– Area 3 = 30% conversion current to 2024
– Area 3 = 60% conversion 2025 to 2034
– Area 3 = 80% conversion 2035 and beyond
• Fort Bend County (FBSD 2003 Regulatory Plan)
– Area A = 30% conversion 2014 to 2024 (same as Scenario 2)
– R/R Sub-Area = 30% conversion 2016 to 2024 (same as Scenario 2)
– Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 50% conversion 2025 to 2034
– Area A and R/R Sub-Area = 65% conversion 2035 and beyond
– Area B remains on 100% groundwater (same as Scenario 2).
• Montgomery County (LSGCD 2009 Regulatory Plan)
– 30% conversion in 2016 based on 2009 demands. Groundwater capped at 64,000 acre-feet per year
for 2017 and beyond (same as Scenario 2).
• Brazoria County (BCGCD)
– Assume City of Pearland (including ETJ) converts to 50% surface water by 2016 and beyond.
50. Key Stakeholder Testimony for 2013 Plan
• Change to the 2025 Conversion date
makes infrastructure construction
achievable
• Plans for completion of the Luces
Bayou Water Transfer will remain on
schedule with already existing
timetables
51. Key Stakeholder Testimony for 2013 Plan
• Change to the 2025 Conversion date
makes future conversion costs more
acceptable
• Results of changes outlined in Scenario
3 do not create significant impact on
future subsidence rates
52. Regulatory Plan
2013
Harris-Galveston
Subsidence District
1660 W. Bay Area Blvd.
Friendswood TX 77546
(281) 486-1105
www.subsidence.org
53. Key Elements – HGSD 2013 Regulatory Plan
• No change to Regulatory Area boundaries
• No change to Areas 1 & 2 Regulations
• Area 1 = 90% conversion
• Area 2 = 80% conversion
3
2
1
54. Key Elements – HGSD 2013 Regulatory Plan
• Area 3 Regulations Updated
• 30% conversion current to 2024
• 60% conversion 2025 to 2034
• 80% conversion 2035 and beyond
3
2
1
57. Land-surface subsidence (1915 through 1917) – 2001 determined by GIS techniques in Harris County, Texas
by Mark C. Kasmarek; 1906-2000 land-surface contours determined by Robert K. Gabrysch