Autonomous Vehicles
By: Rotha Aing
What makes a vehicle autonomous?
• “Driverless”
• Different from remote controlled
• 3 D’s
– Detection
– Delivery
– Data-Gathering
3D’s
• Detection – Reasoning
– The surroundings and current conditions
• Data-gathering – Search
– From the information search knowledgebase
for purposed actions
– What to do next?
• Delivery – Learning
– View and record results of actions
Current Approaches
• Fully Autonomous
– Taxi-like cars
• Autonomous in closed systems
– Monorails
• Assistance System
– Environment Sensing
– Distance Sensors
– ABS
Solution Template
• Sensors: Figure out obstacles around the
vehicle
• Navigation: How to get to the target
location from the present location
• Motion planning: Getting to the location,
getting by any obstacles, following any
rules
• Control: Getting the vehicle itself to move
Current Issues
• Technical
– Sensors
• Understanding the environment
– Navigation
• Know its current position and where it wants to go
– Motion Planning
• Navigation through traffic
– Actuation
• Operate the correct and needed features
Issues
• Social Issues
– Trusting the car
• Getting on public roads
• Getting people to go in
– Liability Issues
– Lost Jobs
What’s been solved?
• Control
• Navigation
• Some issues of Sensory
Control
• Drive-By-Wire
• Sends messages
to onboard
computers
• Physical ties are
unlinked
• In most current
cars
Drive By Wire
• When sensor/trigger is pressed, it
sends message to the car to perform
the tasks
DBW in Autonomous Vehicles
• Replace the human driver
• Activate the sensors/triggers
• SciAutonics
– Servomotors for each gear
– Large servomotor with belt drive for steering
Navigation
• Already
available
• Combination of:
– GPS
– Roadside
database
Sensory
• Major issue:
– Lack of computing power
– “More processors”
• Half completed
– RADAR
– Laser Detection
– Cameras
Sensory Information Issues
• Factors of weather
– Dust, rain, fog
• Correctly Identifying an obstacle
– Shadows vs. ditches
– Shallow vs. deep
• Speed of the vehicle and the speed data
can be correctly received
Motion Planning
• Most challenging
• Collision Detection
• Affected by:
– Quality of Sensory information
– Quality of Controls
• Need for algorithm that can determine
movements quickly but also the correct
ones
“Road Map”
• Decision Tree (Graph)
– With points A and G
– Fill in free spots (Configuration Space)
– Try to link A to G
• Configuration Space Algorithms
– Sampling-based
• Faster, less computing power
– Combinatorial
• More complete
Configuration Space
DARPA Challenge
• Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency
• 2004 Desert Course
• 2005 Off-road, mountain terrain
• 2007 Urban Challenge
– Collision Avoidance
– Obey traffic signs
Stanley
• 2005 DARPA
Challenge
winner
• Volkswagen
Touareg
modified with
onboard
computers
Stanley’s Sensory
• 5 LIDAR lasers
• 24 GHz RADAR
• Stereo camera
• Single-lens camera
Path Analysis
• Built in RDDF (database of course)
• Vehicle predominantly followed the RDDF
data
Obstacle Detection
• Machine Learning Approach
• Accuracy value of data is based on how
human’s perform
• Slows down when a path can not be found
quickly
• Grid of either occupied, free, or unknown
spots
Issues with mapping scheme
• Errors in determining environment
– 12.6% of areas determined as obstacle was
not
Alice out of challenge
Personal Opinions
• Good progress since the first challenge
• Not until the 2007 challenge will we really
know if a fully autonomous vehicle is
possible in the near future
• Other approaches more likely to be
developed into mainstream before fully
autonomous vehicles

Autonomous Vehicles PP.ppt

  • 1.
  • 2.
    What makes avehicle autonomous? • “Driverless” • Different from remote controlled • 3 D’s – Detection – Delivery – Data-Gathering
  • 3.
    3D’s • Detection –Reasoning – The surroundings and current conditions • Data-gathering – Search – From the information search knowledgebase for purposed actions – What to do next? • Delivery – Learning – View and record results of actions
  • 4.
    Current Approaches • FullyAutonomous – Taxi-like cars • Autonomous in closed systems – Monorails • Assistance System – Environment Sensing – Distance Sensors – ABS
  • 5.
    Solution Template • Sensors:Figure out obstacles around the vehicle • Navigation: How to get to the target location from the present location • Motion planning: Getting to the location, getting by any obstacles, following any rules • Control: Getting the vehicle itself to move
  • 6.
    Current Issues • Technical –Sensors • Understanding the environment – Navigation • Know its current position and where it wants to go – Motion Planning • Navigation through traffic – Actuation • Operate the correct and needed features
  • 7.
    Issues • Social Issues –Trusting the car • Getting on public roads • Getting people to go in – Liability Issues – Lost Jobs
  • 8.
    What’s been solved? •Control • Navigation • Some issues of Sensory
  • 9.
    Control • Drive-By-Wire • Sendsmessages to onboard computers • Physical ties are unlinked • In most current cars
  • 10.
    Drive By Wire •When sensor/trigger is pressed, it sends message to the car to perform the tasks
  • 11.
    DBW in AutonomousVehicles • Replace the human driver • Activate the sensors/triggers • SciAutonics – Servomotors for each gear – Large servomotor with belt drive for steering
  • 12.
    Navigation • Already available • Combinationof: – GPS – Roadside database
  • 13.
    Sensory • Major issue: –Lack of computing power – “More processors” • Half completed – RADAR – Laser Detection – Cameras
  • 14.
    Sensory Information Issues •Factors of weather – Dust, rain, fog • Correctly Identifying an obstacle – Shadows vs. ditches – Shallow vs. deep • Speed of the vehicle and the speed data can be correctly received
  • 15.
    Motion Planning • Mostchallenging • Collision Detection • Affected by: – Quality of Sensory information – Quality of Controls • Need for algorithm that can determine movements quickly but also the correct ones
  • 16.
    “Road Map” • DecisionTree (Graph) – With points A and G – Fill in free spots (Configuration Space) – Try to link A to G • Configuration Space Algorithms – Sampling-based • Faster, less computing power – Combinatorial • More complete
  • 17.
  • 18.
    DARPA Challenge • DefenseAdvanced Research Projects Agency • 2004 Desert Course • 2005 Off-road, mountain terrain • 2007 Urban Challenge – Collision Avoidance – Obey traffic signs
  • 19.
    Stanley • 2005 DARPA Challenge winner •Volkswagen Touareg modified with onboard computers
  • 20.
    Stanley’s Sensory • 5LIDAR lasers • 24 GHz RADAR • Stereo camera • Single-lens camera
  • 22.
    Path Analysis • Builtin RDDF (database of course) • Vehicle predominantly followed the RDDF data
  • 23.
    Obstacle Detection • MachineLearning Approach • Accuracy value of data is based on how human’s perform • Slows down when a path can not be found quickly • Grid of either occupied, free, or unknown spots
  • 25.
    Issues with mappingscheme • Errors in determining environment – 12.6% of areas determined as obstacle was not
  • 26.
    Alice out ofchallenge
  • 27.
    Personal Opinions • Goodprogress since the first challenge • Not until the 2007 challenge will we really know if a fully autonomous vehicle is possible in the near future • Other approaches more likely to be developed into mainstream before fully autonomous vehicles