VTA Envision Silicon Valley Program PresentationSCVTA
This presentation was shared with various community groups in 2015 and into early 2016 to provide information and solicit input about VTA's long-range transportation plan, Envision Silicon Valley, and a potential 2016 transportation sales tax measure. Learn more at http://www.vta.org/envision
Funding Transportation Improvements in Santa Clara CountySCVTA
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority presentation to the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors about Funding Transportation Improvements in Santa Clara County on Aug. 25, 2015.
VTA presented this report about Envision Silicon Valley public input to Ad Hoc Committee on Envision Silicon Valley in February 2016. For more information about the program, visit http://www.vta.org/envision
This presentation was shared on Feb. 20 and 24 with volunteer groups participating in the Envision Silicon Valley effort (http://www.vta.org/envision-silicon-valley/envision-silicon-valley).
VTA's Preliminary Envision Silicon Valley Project EvaluationSCVTA
This presentation contains the preliminary results of the project analysis for Envision Silicon Valley. This preliminary project evaluation may be updated as the results are further analyzed, and some additional projects will be added to the document. Learn more at http://www.vta.org/envision-silicon-valley/project-evaluation. Revised April 2016.
Current Condition of Santa Clara County's Transportation SystemSCVTA
This presentation from Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority provides an overview of the current condition of the county's transportation system, including roadways, highways, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This was developed as part of VTA's Envision Silicon Valley effort (http://www.vta.org/envision).
VTA's Envision Silicon Valley May 2016 community meetings presentationSCVTA
This presentation was shared at public community meetings VTA hosted in May 2016 about staff’s recommended expenditure plan for the possible sales tax measure on the November ballot.
VTA Envision Silicon Valley Program PresentationSCVTA
This presentation was shared with various community groups in 2015 and into early 2016 to provide information and solicit input about VTA's long-range transportation plan, Envision Silicon Valley, and a potential 2016 transportation sales tax measure. Learn more at http://www.vta.org/envision
Funding Transportation Improvements in Santa Clara CountySCVTA
Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority presentation to the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors about Funding Transportation Improvements in Santa Clara County on Aug. 25, 2015.
VTA presented this report about Envision Silicon Valley public input to Ad Hoc Committee on Envision Silicon Valley in February 2016. For more information about the program, visit http://www.vta.org/envision
This presentation was shared on Feb. 20 and 24 with volunteer groups participating in the Envision Silicon Valley effort (http://www.vta.org/envision-silicon-valley/envision-silicon-valley).
VTA's Preliminary Envision Silicon Valley Project EvaluationSCVTA
This presentation contains the preliminary results of the project analysis for Envision Silicon Valley. This preliminary project evaluation may be updated as the results are further analyzed, and some additional projects will be added to the document. Learn more at http://www.vta.org/envision-silicon-valley/project-evaluation. Revised April 2016.
Current Condition of Santa Clara County's Transportation SystemSCVTA
This presentation from Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority provides an overview of the current condition of the county's transportation system, including roadways, highways, transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. This was developed as part of VTA's Envision Silicon Valley effort (http://www.vta.org/envision).
VTA's Envision Silicon Valley May 2016 community meetings presentationSCVTA
This presentation was shared at public community meetings VTA hosted in May 2016 about staff’s recommended expenditure plan for the possible sales tax measure on the November ballot.
Find which are 5 best instruments for saving tax under section 80c of income tax act. Check what are most important things to check before investing for saving taxes
This file provides complete information about the Public Provident Fund (PPF). It provides features, withdrawal from PPF, loan from PPF, consequences of default in deposit, document required for PPF, etc.
City Manager's Recommended 2015 Investment PlanCity of Dayton
During a work session in early 2015, Dayton City Manager Warren Price and staff reviewed the organization's 2014 investments and outlined recommended investments and projects for 2015.
This presentation was given at the Southern Georgia Regional Commission Council meeting on July 25, 2013. It uses slides from the Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority for the content regarding the Georgia Transportation Infrastructure Bank details.
VTA recently released its second “Development Review Annual Report” based on VTA’s review of proposed development and transportation projects throughout Santa Clara County.
VTA reviews and comments on such projects to improve land use/transportation coordination, promote alternative travel modes, and encourage a balanced approach to addressing congestion. VTA prepares quarterly reports about our reviews.
VTA’s new “Development Review Annual Report” for 2015 documents the facts (e.g., projects reviewed and VTA comments) but also interprets the significance of the development activity over the year for VTA and local agencies.
Cleveland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Public Meeting - April 9, 2014COTA BUS
COTA is conducting preliminary design, engineering and environmental clearance for the Cleveland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The proposed service will transport riders between downtown Columbus and Polaris Parkway/Africa Road, connect with existing bus routes, and include new stations. COTA is creating a unique identity for the proposed BRT/Enhanced Bus Service for Cleveland Avenue.
Reid Simons, director of government and public affairs for the N.C. Turnpike Authority, provides an update on the Garden Parkway and Monroe Connector at the Charlotte Chamber 2011 Transportation Summit.
Find which are 5 best instruments for saving tax under section 80c of income tax act. Check what are most important things to check before investing for saving taxes
This file provides complete information about the Public Provident Fund (PPF). It provides features, withdrawal from PPF, loan from PPF, consequences of default in deposit, document required for PPF, etc.
City Manager's Recommended 2015 Investment PlanCity of Dayton
During a work session in early 2015, Dayton City Manager Warren Price and staff reviewed the organization's 2014 investments and outlined recommended investments and projects for 2015.
This presentation was given at the Southern Georgia Regional Commission Council meeting on July 25, 2013. It uses slides from the Georgia State Road and Tollway Authority for the content regarding the Georgia Transportation Infrastructure Bank details.
VTA recently released its second “Development Review Annual Report” based on VTA’s review of proposed development and transportation projects throughout Santa Clara County.
VTA reviews and comments on such projects to improve land use/transportation coordination, promote alternative travel modes, and encourage a balanced approach to addressing congestion. VTA prepares quarterly reports about our reviews.
VTA’s new “Development Review Annual Report” for 2015 documents the facts (e.g., projects reviewed and VTA comments) but also interprets the significance of the development activity over the year for VTA and local agencies.
Cleveland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Public Meeting - April 9, 2014COTA BUS
COTA is conducting preliminary design, engineering and environmental clearance for the Cleveland Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project. The proposed service will transport riders between downtown Columbus and Polaris Parkway/Africa Road, connect with existing bus routes, and include new stations. COTA is creating a unique identity for the proposed BRT/Enhanced Bus Service for Cleveland Avenue.
Reid Simons, director of government and public affairs for the N.C. Turnpike Authority, provides an update on the Garden Parkway and Monroe Connector at the Charlotte Chamber 2011 Transportation Summit.
Integrating Community Development and Transportation StrategiesMobility Lab
Arlington’s strategies have yielded substantial economic, transportation, and environmental benefits - allowing continued growth with less reliance on auto trips, and more use of transit and other travel options. It isn’t just one policy but many that contribute to enhanced performance
Jim Proce - APWA Accreditation Briefing - Palm Bay FL July 2008Jim Proce
APWA Accreditation is the mark of a professionally operated Public WOrks Agency. This presentation was a summary of the State of the Palm Bay Public Works Department in 2008, under the leadership of Jim Proce, Chad Shoultz, Elia Twigg, Cindy Best, Lori Parker, and John Cady. The team was successful in becoming the 51st APWA Accreditated agency and was recognized for having best and model practies in place.
15 015 citywide-right-of-way_maintenanceEduardo Luna
The City of San Diego (City) Strategic Plan defines the City’s mission as the following: “To effectively serve and support our communities.” To carry out that mission, the City must maintain a large and diverse inventory of infrastructure assets in the public right-of-way (ROW). ROW assets include streets, sidewalks, alleys, street and traffic lights, road signage, and water and sewer lines. The City relies heavily on its residents to identify and report maintenance needs, such as potholes, illegal dumping, and damaged sidewalks. As such, maximizing the City’s accessibility to residents is essential to the City’s ability to adequately maintain the ROW.
We surveyed 677 residents who recently submitted ROW service requests found that customer satisfaction could be improved from the current 63 percent satisfaction rate. Importantly, because the City provides more than 30 ROW maintenance services through multiple departments and divisions, it can be challenging for residents to identify the proper channel to submit their service requests. Our survey
respondents indicated that even though they frequently notice ROW maintenance needs, they rarely report them—four out of five respondents indicated that they report maintenance needs once a year or less. We found that the City can increase ease of reporting needs and improve customer satisfaction by centralizing customer service operations. Most large municipalities and jurisdictions in the United States and Canada have centralized customer service with a single phone number, website, and mobile app that are branded with 3-1-1, an easy-to-remember number reserved for municipal use.
Analyst breakfast: North American consultancy business - 19 March 2015Atkins
This analyst presentation by North America CEO Joe Boyer discusses our North American consultancy business: market opportunities, business strategy, core service offerings, sector focuses and revenue targets.
Similar to Atl bond presentation council retreat 10-17-14 (20)
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
1. Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
Investing in a commitment today to meet the
infrastructure challenges of the future.
Attached hereto is a DRAFT listing of potential bond projects which may be presented to
voters for consideration at the [March] 2015 referendum election. This list is preliminary and
has been compiled from a master listing of all needed infrastructure improvement. This
preliminary listing is being presented in DRAFT form for discussion purposes only and not as
an indication of intention that such list will be the final list within the meaning of O.C.G.A. 36-
81-1(d). The final projects for consideration at the referendum election will be advertised
prior to the election and will be described on the ballot question.”
October 2014
2. 2
Meeting Agenda
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
• Opening Remarks
• Feedback from First Round of Public Meetings
• Review Draft List of Projects
• Horizontal (roads, sidewalks, bridges, etc.)
• Vertical (police & fire stations, recreational centers, other facilities)
• Questions & Answers
• Breakout Session
• Review Project Maps
• Receive Public Feedback
3. 3
Key Events
June 2014: Public Information Meeting (1st Round)
September 2014: Public Information Meetings (2nd Round)
December 1, 2014: City Council Votes on Legislation
February 2015: Public Information Meetings (3rd Round)
March 17, 2015: Residents Vote on Bond Referendum
Please visit: www.atlantaga.gov/infrastructure
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
NOTE: Public comments received by October 10 will be included in 2nd Round analysis.
4. 4
State of Atlanta’s Infrastructure
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
• $1.02B infrastructure backlog
• The 2010 State of the City’s Transportation Infrastructure Report
identified approximately $881M of transportation infrastructure
• The 2014 City’s Facility Infrastructure Report identified $130.8M
backlog of projects
• The City must take dramatic steps to increase efficiencies and change the
way we do business
• Tackling these problems will also require a significant cash inflow, which is
best done through an infrastructure bond
5. 5
Why & How a Referendum
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
• An Infrastructure Bond Referendum is a vote within the City to approve or
reject a request to borrow money to fund infrastructure projects
• The Atlanta City Council must vote to authorize an election to be held for
the purpose of determining whether bonds shall be issued for the stated
amount and purpose
• Mayor Reed intends to ask the City Council in November to authorize a
bond referendum vote to be held in March 2015
6. 6
No Impact on Atlanta Taxpayers
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
• Atlanta taxpayers are not expected to see any increase to their property
taxes as a result of the infrastructure bond Issuance
• The City’s strong credit rating will provide for a lower cost of borrowing
• The annual debt service on the bonds, estimated at $17 million, will be
paid from implementing cost savings outlined in the Mayor’s Waste &
Efficiency Commission Report
7. 7
Next Steps…
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
• Deferred maintenance backlog is $1.02 billion
• Based on comments received and technical analysis we have narrowed the
list to $350 million
• Your ideas along with further technical analysis will get us to an achievable
bond list
8. 8
Facilities Criteria
Infrastructure Sustainability
Safety Enhancement Issues
Facility Functional Needs Met
Funding for Facility Replacement
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
What We Heard
10%
9%
17%
33%
31%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Core & Shell Systems Failure
Transportation Criteria
3%
11%
11%
8%
7%
7%
6%
10%
14%
25%
0% 10% 20% 30%
Provide for Bicycle & Pedestrian
Facilities
Connection to Transit
Part of Neighoborhood Plan
Preservation of Neighborhoods
Leverage Federal, State Funds
Promote Public Health and Safety
Green Infrastructure Innovation
Infrastructure Sustainability
Part of Connect Atlanta Plan
Connection to other Projects
9. 9
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
Draft Project List
Bond Portfolio Summary
Facilities $101,057,400
Transportation $234,986,484
*Administration $14,132,781
TOTAL $350,176,665
What We Heard
Facilities Projects
Transportation
Projects
Facilities
29%
Transportation
67%
Administration
4%
Infrastructure Bond Portfolio
* Includes Pre-bond Professional Services, Program Management and 1.5% of Construction for Art
10. 10
About Facilities…
Recreational Centers
Fire Stations
Police Stations
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
Draft Project List
$101,057,400
What We Heard
39%
26%
26%
9%
Parks & Recreation
Fire Stations
Police Stations
Government Buildings
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
6%
25%
31%
38%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Government Buildings
11. 11
About Transportation…
Sidewalk, Curbing & ADA Ramps
Unpaved Roads & Street
Resurfacing
Street Lights
TIA Referendum Local Projects
Signals, Signs, & School Zone
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
Draft Project List
$234,986,484
What We Heard
12%
12%
10%
9%
31%
27%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Bridges
Flashers
42%
35%
12%
10%
Complete Streets & Sidewalks
Roads, Curbs & Street Lights
Traffic Operations
Bridges
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
12. 12
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
Draft Project List Breakdown
Category Description Needed Funds
Transportation Projects Bridges, Bicycle-Pedestrian Infrastructure, Roadways, Traffic Signals $ 112,086,484
Program - Roadway Curbing High & medium priority curbing & minor drainage program $ 21,600,000
Program - Bicycle-Pedestrian High sidewalk repairs and DOJ/ADA compliance $ 76,000,000
Program - Roadway Street Lights High priority lighting repair and street light LED conversions $ 21,000,000
Program - Traffic Signage Upgrade of MUTCD size and lettering requirements for street name signs $ 4,300,000
Transportation Total $ 234,986,484
Facilities Projects Corrections, Fire Stations, Police Stations, Parks and Recreation Centers $ 95,614,000
Program - ADA Compliance & OEAM ADA Compliance & Municipal Building Improvement Programs $ 5,443,400
Facilities Total $ 101,057,400
Administration Total Pre-bond professional services, program management, and art $ 14,132,781
Total $ 350,176,665
Attached hereto is a DRAFT listing of potential bond projects which may be presented to
voters for consideration at the [March] 2015 referendum election. This list is preliminary and
has been compiled from a master listing of all needed infrastructure improvement. This
preliminary listing is being presented in DRAFT form for discussion purposes only and not as
an indication of intention that such list will be the final list within the meaning of O.C.G.A. 36-
81-1(d). The final projects for consideration at the referendum election will be advertised
prior to the election and will be described on the ballot question.”
13. 13
Key Events
June 2014: Public Information Meeting (1st Round)
September 2014: Public Information Meetings (2nd Round)
December 1, 2014: City Council Votes on Legislation
February 2015: Public Information Meetings (3rd Round)
March 17, 2015: Residents Vote on Bond Referendum
Please visit: www.atlantaga.gov/infrastructure
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
NOTE: Public comments received by October 10 will be included in 2nd Round analysis.
14. 14
City of Atlanta
Kasim Reed
Mayor
Ceasar C. Mitchell
President
Michael Julian Bond
Post 1 At Large
Mary Norwood
Post 2 At Large
Andre Dickens
Post 3 At Large
Carla Smith
District 1
Kwanza Hall
District 2
Ivory Lee Young, Jr.
District 3
Cleta Winslow
District 4
Natalyn Archibong
District 5
Alex Wan
District 6
Howard Shook
District 7
Yolanda Adrean
District 8
Felicia A. Moore
District 9
C. T. Martin
District 10
Keisha Lance Bottoms
District 11
Joyce Sheperd
District 12
October 17, 2014
Atlanta 2015 Infrastructure Bond
Thank You!
Investing in a commitment today to meet the transportation challenges of the future.
Editor's Notes
Top left: Fire Station #18
Top right: Downtown Atlanta, courtesy of COA DP&CD
Bottom: Fire Station #28/Zone 2 mini-precinct
Here is a schedule of upcoming events…
Bridge Replacement & Maintenance: $259M, 30%
Street Resurfacing: $262M, 31%
Sidewalks, Curbs, and ADA Ramps*: $204M, 24%
Cost Savings Initiatives from Waste & Efficiency Report:
Sale of Surplus Assets, Operating Savings from the Sold Assets, Workers Compensation Efficiency Savings, Performance Budgeting
In the first round of Public Meetings, we hosted 7 mtgs across the City in all 4 quadrants
During those meetings, you told us what project categories and criteria were most important to you
Facilities Criteria
Facilities Life Cycle and Safety Enhancements were the top two criteria.
These criteria consistently ranked high across all seven meetings.
Transportation Criteria
Transportation Criteria as a whole was the most popular board among the voters, receiving a total of 1,040 dots, nearly 50 percent of all votes cast.
In 6 of the 7 meetings, providing for “Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities” was the overwhelmingly preferred criteria.
“Connection to Transit” and the two neighborhood-oriented criteria rounded out the top four.
Out of the votes that we received, approximately 23% went towards facilities and 77% towards transportation.
Our current list of projects is broken out in a similar fashion, with 2/3 towards transportation and nearly 1/3 towards facilities.
The remaining 6% will be set aside for Program Administration and Art.
Examples of art would include painted pavers, sculptures, sundials, enhanced landscaping and benches, and murals
Facilities Projects
Recreation centers received the most votes at six of the seven meetings.
Fire and police station consistently ranked second and third, with very little difference in the meeting over meeting tallies between the two types of facilities.
Government buildings received just 14 of the 2,211 votes, the fewest votes of any project or criteria type across the meeting series.
As stated earlier, over ¾ of your votes went towards transportation projects.
Transportation Projects
Pedestrian Infrastructure and Street Resurfacing were overwhelming leaders among the project offerings.
There was moderate support for the TIA projects and street lights.
Traffic Signals, Signs and Flashers and Bridges received the least support.
The 6 Categories have been condensed to 4 types of projects on the bond list.
Six of the twelve complete street projects are TIA. Complete streets is in the Bike-Ped category.
TIA Projects
ML King, Jr Dr
DeKalb Ave
J E Boone Blvd
Howell Mill Rd
Cascade Rd
JE Lowery Blvd
Additional Notes on the Transportation Results
There is an apparent inconsistency between the Criteria “Infrastructure Sustainability” scoring low while votes for the Project Type Resurfacing Streets scoring extremely high. Two factors appeared to contribute to this: some participants may have believed “sustainability” referred to environmental sustainability rather than roadway life cycle, while many of the bicycle advocates supported resurfacing, but voted for the combined bike/ped criteria rather than the Infrastructure Sustainability” criteria.
There was general consistency across the community meetings with the exception of Adamsville. At the Adamsville meeting, attendees tended to be older and the location more suburban that the other meeting locations. Participants prioritized neighborhood-related criteria, safety, and resurfacing streets over bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. At the other six meetings, bike/ped-related projects and criteria were consistently ranked first or second.
This slide just breaks down the proposed budget for each category
You will see that some categories have specific projects identified and the remaining are shown as programs
The maps that you will review and comment on after this presentation only shows the specific projects that have been identified.
You will not see specific ADA Improvements, sidewalks, traffic signs, street lights and artwork
Here is a schedule of upcoming events…
This is the first step towards addressing the critical infrastructure needs of the City. We plan to seek future bonds to continue to address the backlog in an effort to put us on a proactive track towards infrastructure