The document is a blog analysis by Rosalin Zein of level C. It analyzes and compares the blogs of Abigail Edwards and Milka Erko. For Abigail's blog, Rosalin notes what went well, what could be improved, and gives it an overall mark of 17/20 or level B. For Milka's blog, a similar analysis is provided and it is given an overall mark of 16/20 or grade B. In the similarities and differences section at the end, Rosalin notes both blogs had many pictures but Abigail's had more explanations while Milka's had less context for the photos and videos. Neither blog was in chronological order.

1. Assignment 2:
Blog analysis.
Rosalin Zein, 12 Pius.

2. The target level that I am doing is level C.
I will be analysing Abigail Edwards’s and Milka Erko’s blogs.
I chose these two blogs because they are from different groups.
The first one I will be analysing is Abigail Edward’s....

3. What Went Well: Even Better if:
She included reviews of her work. She had added her target levels and
targets.
She had pictures of her filming with her The levels for each draft + reviews of each
group. draft and they aren’t fully completed .
She included extra work she did to The blog was in chronological order to
improve her story board and helpful make it easier to navigate.
blogs.
The blog is clear and easy to read and had Some of her photos are not uploaded
some embedded videos. correctly.
She wrote about each assignment and the
spelling and grammar was good.

4. The blog
looks nice
She and is
added presented
her own clearly.
thoughts
on her
draft.
The I would give the
headings blog a mark of
stand out 17/20.
from the Which I think is a
background level B.
She included scans of
her assessment for
each draft.

5. The second blog is Milka Erko’s:

6. What went well: Even better if:
Shows the changes made throughout. Included more writing
Lots of photos and embedded videos It showed the level of each draft
about the planning separately than on the scans of the
teachers assessment.
Extra work about camera shots Pictures of the story boards and planning
were more clearer.
Shows teachers feed back. The assignment posts were in order.
Shows time table of when their group met
up.

7. No introduction about what the
Includes slideshows.
slideshow shows.
Has teacher
assessments
for each
draft.
Overall i would give this a 16/20. So a grade B. Nice background.

8. Similarities and differences:
• They were both similar in that they both had a good amount of pictures
and slideshows.
•However, I think Abigail had more explanations of her work rather than
only pictures and also she used the blog like a normal blog.
•Milka’s blog had the same amount of photos but with less or even no
introductions and explanations of her work. She did post more extra work.
•Both the blogs weren't in chronological order which would have made it
easier to navigate and understand the changes.