2. TITLE OF THE STUDY
A study to assess the knowledge regarding the prevention of
home accidents among the mothers of under-five children in a
selected community, Mangalore.
4. ABOUT THE JOURNAL
International Journal of Advances in Nursing Management
(IJANM)
An international, peer-reviewed journal devoted to nursing
sciences.
The journal is published quarterly every year in last week of
March, June, September and December.
ISSN-2347-8632 (Print)
ISSN-2454-2652 (Online)
Impact factor : 2.
The journal is indexed/listed with Google Scholar.
5. IJANM
Vol : Vol. 09
Isssue : 04 (Oct – Dec 2021)
Page No. : 408 - 412
DOI : 10.52711/2454-2652.2021.00094
Language of Publication : English
Received on : 18.07.2021
Accepted on :13.08.2021
6. AUTHORS
Total Authors : 11
Annmariya T.A, Arya K, Binni Varughese, Diniya M.T, Festimol Pinhero,
Jubi Biju, Mariya Johny, Saranya Sasi, Sowmya M.N, Stephy S
(Students, Srinivas Institute of Nursing Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka,
India)
Prof. Florine Clara Fernandes
(Principal, Srinivas Institute of Nursing Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka,
India)
Corresponding author : Prof. Florine Clara Fernandes
7. ABSTRACT
The Abstract consists of a structured paragraph with sub heads.
Follows the IMRAD pattern (Introduction, Methodology, Results
And Discussion)
Brief, concise and factual.
Written clearly that the reader can decide whether to read the
entire report or not.
Abstract is followed by 4 keywords.
8. KEY WORDS
4 keywords are given for indexing purpose.
Knowledge, Prevention of home accidents, Mothers, Underfive
Children.
9. INTRODUCTION
Given in 2 paragraphs.
Begins broadly by narrating about children, their environment and
then narrows down specifically to home accidents and significance
of the study by citing statistical data from WHO report and CDC
report.
10. BACKGROUND AND NEED OF THE STUDY
Given in 3 paragraphs
Each paragraph deals with literature review on similar study
conducted at international and national level, i.e. At Nepal and India
(Belgaum and Gurugram) esq.
11. PROBLEM STATEMENT
A study to assess the knowledge regarding the prevention of
home accidents among the mothers of under-five children in a
selected community, Mangalore.
12. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
1. To assess the knowledge of mothers regarding prevention of
home accidents.
2. To find association between the knowledge score of mothers
and selected demographic variables.
13. HYPOTHESIS
H1 : There is significant relationship between the knowledge of
mothers of under-five children regarding prevention of home
accidents with selected demographic variables.
14. METHODOLOGY
Research Approach :– Quantitative
Research Design :– Descriptive
Research Setting :– Valachil Community, Mangalore
Population :– Mothers of under-five children
residing in Valachil community.
Sample :– 50 mothers of under-five children
residing in Valachil community.
Sampling technique :– Non – probability convenience
sampling
Tool :– Structured Questionnaire with 2 parts
Socio-demographic proforma and
Structured Knowledge Questionnaire
15. DATA ANALYSIS
On the basis of Objectives and Hypothesis, the data was
analyzed as follows:
1. Demographic data in terms of frequency and percentage.
2. Knowledge level of mothers of underfive children in terms of
frequency, percentage, mean, median and standard
deviation.
3. Chi-square test to find the association between pre-test
knowledge score and demographic variables.
16. RESULTS
SECTION – I : Demographic Characteristics Of Mothers Of Under-five
Children
SNo VARIABLES CRITERIA FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
1 AGE 19-24
25-31
32-37
14
17
19
28
34
38
2 RELIGION HINDU
MUSLIM
CHRISTIAN
6
23
21
12
46
42
3 TYPE OF FAMILY NUCLEAR
JOINT
EXTENDED
20
18
12
40
36
24
4 No. OF CHILDREN < 5YRS 1
2
3
25
15
10
50
30
20
5 EDUCATION OF MOTHER PRIMARY
SECONDARY
PRE-UNIVERSITY
UNDERGRADUATE
19
12
8
11
38
24
16
22
6 WHETHER CHILD MET WITH ANY
TYPE OF ACCIDENT
YES
NO
5
45
10
90
17. RESULTS
Section II: Knowledge of the mothers of under five children on
prevention of home accidents
SECTION – II, PART A : ASSESSMENT OF LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE
Level of knowledge Range
of score
Frequency Percentage
Inadequate 0-9 22 44
Moderate 10-18 26 52
Adequate 19-25 2 4
18. RESULTS
SECTION – II, PART B : Mean, Median & Standard Deviation
Percentage Of Knowledge
Domain Max.
score
Min.
score
Range Mean SD Mean
%
Knowledge 19 3 16 10.52 ±4.24 42.08
The maximum score of knowledge is about 19, minimum score is 3,
range 16, mean 10.52, standard deviation 4.24 and the mean
percentage is 42.08%.
19. RESULTS
Section III: Association between the knowledge score of
mothers of under five children on prevention of home
accidents with selected demographic variables
Sl. No. Variables Knowledge score c2 value Inference
≤ median > median
1. Age
8 6 8
1.093
12 5 12 NS
14 5 14
2. Religion
Hindu 5 1
2.155
Muslim 17 6 NS
Christian 12 9
3. Type of family
Nuclear 16 4
2.614
Joint 10 8 NS
Extended 8 4
4. Number of children below 5 years of age
One 16 9
.398
Two 11 4 NS
Three 7 3
5. Education of the mother
Primary 14 5
1.840
Secondary 9 3
Pre-university 4 4 NS
Undergraduate 7 4
6. Whether your child met with any type of accident?
Yes 4 1
.368
NS
No 30 15
20. Section III: Association between knowledge scores and
selected variables
• To test the association between knowledge scores and selected
demographic variables, the following null hypothesis was
formulated:
• H01: There will be no significant association between the
knowledge score of adults and the selected baseline variables.
21. Section III: Association between knowledge scores and
selected variables
The chi-square value computed between the level of knowledge
and selected demographic variables, i.e., age (c2
2=1.093) Religion
(c2
2=2.155), Type of family (c2
2=2.614), number of children below
5 years of age (c2
2=.398) educational status (c2
3=1.840) of the
mothers and whether the child met with any type of accidents
(c2
1=.368) not significant at 0.05 level.
Thus, it can be interpreted that there was no significant
association between knowledge of mothers of under five children
and selected variables.
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H01) was accepted and research
hypothesis was rejected.
22. DISCUSSION
Majority of the samples :
Belongs to age group :- 32-37 (38%)
Were Muslims (46%)
Belonged to nuclear family (40%)
were having one child (50%)
Were having primary education (38%)
Children had not met with any home accidents (90%)
23. DISCUSSION
1. The present study showed
1. majority (54%) of the respondents had moderate
knowledge,
2. 44% had adequate knowledge,
3. (4%) had inadequate knowledge.
2. There was no significant association between knowledge of
mothers of under-five children and selected variables such
as age, religion, type of family, number of children below 5
years of age, whether the child met with any type of
accidents.
24. DISCUSSION
• Comparison with other studies at national level was also
done.
• In one of the study similar findings of socio demographic data
is found and in another study similar study results were
found.
• The findings of the present study are contradicting the results
of another study which showed significant association
between mothers age, education, occupation, socio economic
status, type of family and knowledge regarding first aid
management (p<0.05)
25. CONCLUSION
• The assessment of the knowledge among mothers of under-five
children on prevention of home accidents revealed that majority
(54%) of the respondents had moderate knowledge, 44% had
adequate knowledge, least (4%) had inadequate knowledge.
• The assessment of the association of knowledge among mothers
with selected baseline variables revealed that there is an
association between knowledge and the selected baseline
variables.
• Recommendations: Educating the mothers is necessary to take
adequate precautions to prevent home accidents among under
five children.
26. LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY
• Only one of the factors, i.e., knowledge on prevention home
accidents was assessed.
• A structured questionnaire was used to collect information
on knowledge regarding prevention of home accidents; the
responses were, therefore restricted.
• No attempt was made to follow-up to measure the gain of
knowledge after the collection data.
27. RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on the findings of the present study, following
recommendations are offered for further researchers:
• The study can be replicated among urban mothers also.
• A comparative study can be conducted to assess the
knowledge under-five rural mother and urban mother.
• A large-scale study needs to be carried out to generalise the
findings.
• A planned teaching program can be conducted to improve
the knowledge of mothers on prevention of home
accidents.
30. IMPACT FACTOR
WHAT IS IMPACT FACTOR?
The impact factor (IF) is a measure of the
frequency with which the average article in a journal has been
cited in a particular year. It is used to measure the importance or
rank of a journal by calculating the times its articles are cited.
IF – or Journal Impact Factor is calculated as the
average of the sum of the citations received in a given year to a
journal's previous two years of publications, divided by the sum
of “citable” publications in the previous two years
31. HOW DO IMPACT FACTOR IS
CALCULATED?
The annual JCR impact factor is a ratio between
citations and recent citable items published. Thus,
the impact factor of a journal is calculated
by dividing the number of current year citations to
the source items published in that journal during the
previous two years
32. WHAT IS A GOOD IMPACT FACTOR
FOR Journals?
In general, an impact factor of 10 or higher is
considered remarkable, while 3 is good, and the
average score is less than 1.