This document summarizes an academic article about organizational ambidexterity, or the ability of organizations to balance exploration of new opportunities with exploitation of existing capabilities. It discusses how maintaining this balance is important for long-term survival but difficult to achieve. Three case studies are presented of leaders attempting to drive ambidexterity in their companies: Mike Lawrie addressing disruptive innovation at Misys, Ganesh Natarajan implementing new software processes at Zensar Technologies, and Andy Palmer balancing legacy automotive business with electric vehicles at Nissan.
The document discusses competency mapping. It explains that competency mapping identifies an individual's strengths and weaknesses to help them understand where to direct career development efforts. Competency mapping is important for organizations facing rapid change from globalization, increasing competition, and new technologies. Competencies are the intellectual, managerial, social and emotional capabilities derived from job roles that are critical for effective performance. Competency mapping allows organizations to develop their human resources and ensure they have the skills needed to compete in today's fast-paced global marketplace.
The document discusses research on the human resource management practices of 60 large multinational companies. It finds that more successful MNCs had flexible policies and practices, included HR as a strategic partner, and developed global leaders. These companies recognized that to compete globally, organizations must adapt their human assets as readily as other business areas. Flexible practices allowed for cultural variation across countries while upholding core values like non-discrimination. Effective global HR management contributed to stronger financial performance.
Solutions Manual for Managing Human Resources 16th Edition by Snellriven013
This document discusses strategic human resource planning and its importance in organizational success. It provides an overview of the six step process for strategic HR planning: 1) establishing mission, vision and values, 2) analyzing external environment and competition, 3) analyzing internal resources, 4) formulating corporate and business strategies, 5) implementing strategies, and 6) evaluating strategies. Key aspects of strategic HR planning include aligning HR strategies with business strategies, forecasting future workforce needs, developing core employee capabilities, and ensuring strategies can adapt to changing business environments. The document emphasizes integrating HR planning with overall strategic planning.
1. The document discusses and compares several resource-based views of competitive strategy proposed by different authors, including Barney, Peteraf, Grant, Prahalad & Hamel, and Stalk, Evans & Schulman.
2. These views propose that a firm's unique resources and capabilities, rather than just its products/markets, provide the basis for competitive advantage. These include core competencies, capabilities, knowledge integration, business processes, and employee skills.
3. While the views have some differences, they generally argue that strategy should leverage a firm's unique internal resources and capabilities across the entire organization to enhance competitive advantage over time.
This document provides information about human resource management trends in the 21st century. It discusses how the role of HR professionals is evolving from administrative tasks to strategic business partners. Motivation and developing talent will be key focus areas for HR. The document also outlines several competency models for HR professionals, including skills related to business management, leadership, change management, and technical expertise. Looking to the future, the document discusses how HR will need to help organizations address issues like attrition, retention, quality, and innovation through new policies and initiatives.
2013 building the_right_high_potential_pool_white_paperRye Cruz
As leaders our main job is not only to lead people but to develop the right people to be leaders as well. Hope this white paper can help add knowledge and ideas to it.
The document discusses competency mapping. It explains that competency mapping identifies an individual's strengths and weaknesses to help them understand where to direct career development efforts. Competency mapping is important for organizations facing rapid change from globalization, increasing competition, and new technologies. Competencies are the intellectual, managerial, social and emotional capabilities derived from job roles that are critical for effective performance. Competency mapping allows organizations to develop their human resources and ensure they have the skills needed to compete in today's fast-paced global marketplace.
The document discusses research on the human resource management practices of 60 large multinational companies. It finds that more successful MNCs had flexible policies and practices, included HR as a strategic partner, and developed global leaders. These companies recognized that to compete globally, organizations must adapt their human assets as readily as other business areas. Flexible practices allowed for cultural variation across countries while upholding core values like non-discrimination. Effective global HR management contributed to stronger financial performance.
Solutions Manual for Managing Human Resources 16th Edition by Snellriven013
This document discusses strategic human resource planning and its importance in organizational success. It provides an overview of the six step process for strategic HR planning: 1) establishing mission, vision and values, 2) analyzing external environment and competition, 3) analyzing internal resources, 4) formulating corporate and business strategies, 5) implementing strategies, and 6) evaluating strategies. Key aspects of strategic HR planning include aligning HR strategies with business strategies, forecasting future workforce needs, developing core employee capabilities, and ensuring strategies can adapt to changing business environments. The document emphasizes integrating HR planning with overall strategic planning.
1. The document discusses and compares several resource-based views of competitive strategy proposed by different authors, including Barney, Peteraf, Grant, Prahalad & Hamel, and Stalk, Evans & Schulman.
2. These views propose that a firm's unique resources and capabilities, rather than just its products/markets, provide the basis for competitive advantage. These include core competencies, capabilities, knowledge integration, business processes, and employee skills.
3. While the views have some differences, they generally argue that strategy should leverage a firm's unique internal resources and capabilities across the entire organization to enhance competitive advantage over time.
This document provides information about human resource management trends in the 21st century. It discusses how the role of HR professionals is evolving from administrative tasks to strategic business partners. Motivation and developing talent will be key focus areas for HR. The document also outlines several competency models for HR professionals, including skills related to business management, leadership, change management, and technical expertise. Looking to the future, the document discusses how HR will need to help organizations address issues like attrition, retention, quality, and innovation through new policies and initiatives.
2013 building the_right_high_potential_pool_white_paperRye Cruz
As leaders our main job is not only to lead people but to develop the right people to be leaders as well. Hope this white paper can help add knowledge and ideas to it.
This document discusses a survey of human resource management (HRM) practices within family-owned and non-family small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Northern Ireland. The purpose is to identify current HRM practices and compare practices between family and non-family businesses. While large companies invest heavily in training employees, little is known about HRM in SMEs, especially family businesses. The survey aims to provide the first comprehensive examination of HRM practices in SMEs in Northern Ireland and understand any differences between family and non-family owned businesses.
The survey found that almost half of employers provide workforce readiness training to address deficiencies among newly hired employees. However, many employers report that these programs have limited success. While programs exist to improve skills like leadership, IT, and teamwork, there are gaps in other important applied skills like critical thinking. Employers also struggle to measure the impact and cost of workforce readiness programs. The survey raises questions about whether workplace training is the most effective way to improve workforce preparedness.
The document discusses the internal environment of a firm, focusing on resources, capabilities, and core competencies. It defines these terms and explains how they relate.
Resources are a firm's assets such as equipment, employees, brand names, and finances. Capabilities are a firm's ability to integrate resources to achieve objectives and develop over time through complex interactions. Core competencies are capabilities that are valuable, rare, costly to imitate, and nonsubstitutable, and provide competitive advantage. The document provides examples and criteria for identifying core competencies, and explains how they can lead to sustainable competitive advantage and above-average returns.
This document discusses the strategic role of human resources in organizational transformation. It makes three key points:
1) Human resource managers must understand organizational strategies and ensure HR programs support strategic goals. This includes evaluating employee competencies, developing training programs, and communicating strategies to employees.
2) HR programs must be tailored to changing business needs and evaluated for effectiveness. Managers must demonstrate how initiatives improve performance and contribute to goals.
3) HR helps organizations adapt to changing work environments through skills assessment, motivation programs, change management strategies, and integrated HR systems that support each other and organizational transformation.
The resource based view and value- the customer-based view of the firmtamoni
This article discusses exploring the customer perspective of a firm's valuable resources, which has received less attention than the firm's own perspective in resource-based view research. The authors conducted a trial depth interview with a key customer to understand how customers assess a firm's resources. The interview indicated subtle differences between how customers and producers rank valued skills and capabilities. Further research is needed, but understanding the customer perspective could help firms better focus on resources truly valued by customers to achieve competitive advantage.
Explicating resource-based view critiques from a competitive heterogeneity p...Kevin Rommen
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage received stiff critiques during the years, and research discovered several weaknesses. By incorporating resource-based view into competitive heterogeneity we’ll try to weaken common critiques and strengthen the applicability of resource-based view in creating sustainable competitive advantage.
This document outlines nine best practices for effective talent management. It discusses how talent management has become a critical organizational function and competitive advantage. Organizations must identify talent gaps, develop a talent management plan integrated with business strategies, and ensure accurate hiring, promotion, performance management, and development. Effective talent management leads to higher business performance, earnings, and financial outcomes. It is driven by factors such as changing employee and demographic trends, increasing complexity, and expectations from boards and investors for leadership to create value through talent.
Achieving sustainable competitive advantage through resource configurIAEME Publication
This document summarizes a research paper that examines how organizations can achieve sustainable competitive advantage through resource configuration and organizational identity. The paper aims to develop a model for the information technology industry showing how organizational learning, knowledge management, and innovation lead to sustainable competitive advantage when mediated by resource configuration and organizational identity. It reviews literature on sustainable competitive advantage and discusses key theoretical constructs like knowledge management, organizational learning, innovation, resource configuration, and organizational identity.
This document reviews three schools of thought on what sources are likely to be the source of business success: the resource-based view, competence-based view, and dynamic capabilities view. It also discusses criticisms of the resource-based view, which is the most widely used model. Specifically, it outlines 13 criticisms of the resource-based view's VRIO framework, including that it does not fully explain how resources create strategic value and that the framework is not implementable in practice. The document concludes that resources alone cannot create competitive advantage and that dynamic capabilities need to be designed and continuously improved to achieve new advantages.
Strategic human resource management in a changing environmentManoah Baal
Strategic human resource management in a changing environment Chapter 02. A class discussion in Human resource management The process of hiring and developing employees so that they become more valuable to the organization
This document discusses two main perspectives on how information technology contributes to business performance: the market-driven perspective and the resource-based view. It proposes a model that combines these perspectives by showing how both IT support for business strategy and IT support for firm assets impact firm performance. The model was tested via a survey of 96 small and medium enterprises.
A heterogeneous resource based view for exploring relationships between firm ...tamoni
This article explores relationships between firm capabilities and performance using a heterogeneous resource-based view. The authors develop a latent structure regression model to identify clusters of firms that employ different paths to achieve performance based on capabilities. Applying this methodology to 216 US firms, they find a four group solution statistically dominates modeling the sample as one group, suggesting heterogeneity. The four groups provide different insights into how capabilities relate to performance for different industries and strategic types of firms.
This document discusses trends in human resource management (HRM), including outsourcing certain HR functions to reduce costs and focus internal resources on more strategic activities. It also addresses managing a diverse workforce, promoting employee wellness through programs like EAPs and EWPs, and developing talent strategies to attract and retain top performers in a competitive environment. Effective diversity management and a focus on total employee well-being are highlighted as important for organizational success.
Today, no one is safe from forces and pressures, which are exerted on it, because of a significant number of
the requirements in particular as regards competitiveness,the need for change, or the crises and the
deregulations. In front of the economic and social turbulences which we know, the creation of new
company appears as a cause of general interest. This research papers focuses on the problem of the
entrepreneurship, and more particularly on the stake which this domain represents in our society, by
treating the entrepreneurial teams as an opportunity for success the entrepreneurial project. To face this,
entrepreneur must reconsider their behaviors and their practices to renew themselves, to open out and
reinforce their position in the market. Some of these practices form what one calls the entrepreneurial
orientation. For this reason, we will devote this paper for better encircling and apprehending the concept of
entrepreneurial team. We focused on review literature through a survey of a sample of entrepreneurs from
Tunisia.
This document provides an excerpt from a chapter on leadership from the book "Managing and Leading People" published by CIPD. It discusses the differences and similarities between leadership and management. Leadership is described as setting direction and inspiring people, while management focuses more on planning, organizing and problem-solving. The chapter outlines several theoretical frameworks for studying leadership, including traits, behaviors, styles and situational approaches. It explains how these theories can help understand strategic vs operational leadership in organizations.
Mc Kinsey Making Talent A Strategic Priorityina_rasheva
Making talent a strategic priority remains an ongoing challenge for companies. While many have invested heavily in HR systems, talent issues are still not adequately addressed and seen as a long-term strategic issue requiring senior management attention. There are also several external factors like demographic changes, globalization, and the rise of knowledge workers that are intensifying the war for talent. Companies also bear some responsibility due to short-term thinking that diverts attention from long-term talent planning. Moving forward, companies need to view talent management as a core business strategy and address the needs of talent at all levels, not just top performers.
This document provides statistics on key digital media trends including mobile phone and mobile commerce usage, connected TV households, digital video and music consumption, social media usage among millennials, and online display advertising impressions. It highlights declining pay-TV penetration and growing numbers of people using digital formats across video, audio, and television as well as rising time spent on social platforms. Generational demographic data on millennials is also presented.
Johnny Depp has had a successful career as an American actor spanning over 30 years. Some of his most notable roles include Edward Scissorhands, Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean, and Sweeney Todd. He has won several accolades for his acting performances, including Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild awards. Depp became interested in acting after being inspired by a close friend and enjoying several of his early movies as a teenager.
The document describes a Standard Test Data Yield Analysis tool that enables test engineers to perform fast yield analysis and process characterization using standard semiconductor test data files (STDF) without requiring a database. The tool's main features include distribution plots, box plots, parametric wafer maps, Pareto charts, raw data views, software/hardware bin fails, test synopses, and yield information. A benchmark compares the tool to accessing data via a database, showing the tool provides immediate access and analysis capabilities without additional steps or waiting.
This document discusses the growing threat of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) like cancer, heart disease, diabetes and chronic lung disease in South Africa. It notes that while strong healthcare systems are important, prevention must also be prioritized through multi-sectoral efforts targeting risk factors like diet, physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use. Prevention interventions outside the health system, such as taxes, food reformulation, and health promotion in schools and workplaces can help curb NCDs in a cost-effective manner. South Africa needs to develop evidence-based prevention strategies tailored to its specific challenges in order to stem the rising social and economic costs of NCDs.
This document provides tips for creating successful internet marketing campaigns from home. It recommends thoroughly researching your target audience and using that information to increase conversions and effectiveness. Some specific tips include using the word "fast" to appeal to people's value of time over money, keeping your website simple so it can be accessed by all, and incorporating limited time offers to encourage urgency in purchases. The document stresses the importance of constant learning and adapting to changes in internet marketing strategies.
This document discusses a survey of human resource management (HRM) practices within family-owned and non-family small- to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Northern Ireland. The purpose is to identify current HRM practices and compare practices between family and non-family businesses. While large companies invest heavily in training employees, little is known about HRM in SMEs, especially family businesses. The survey aims to provide the first comprehensive examination of HRM practices in SMEs in Northern Ireland and understand any differences between family and non-family owned businesses.
The survey found that almost half of employers provide workforce readiness training to address deficiencies among newly hired employees. However, many employers report that these programs have limited success. While programs exist to improve skills like leadership, IT, and teamwork, there are gaps in other important applied skills like critical thinking. Employers also struggle to measure the impact and cost of workforce readiness programs. The survey raises questions about whether workplace training is the most effective way to improve workforce preparedness.
The document discusses the internal environment of a firm, focusing on resources, capabilities, and core competencies. It defines these terms and explains how they relate.
Resources are a firm's assets such as equipment, employees, brand names, and finances. Capabilities are a firm's ability to integrate resources to achieve objectives and develop over time through complex interactions. Core competencies are capabilities that are valuable, rare, costly to imitate, and nonsubstitutable, and provide competitive advantage. The document provides examples and criteria for identifying core competencies, and explains how they can lead to sustainable competitive advantage and above-average returns.
This document discusses the strategic role of human resources in organizational transformation. It makes three key points:
1) Human resource managers must understand organizational strategies and ensure HR programs support strategic goals. This includes evaluating employee competencies, developing training programs, and communicating strategies to employees.
2) HR programs must be tailored to changing business needs and evaluated for effectiveness. Managers must demonstrate how initiatives improve performance and contribute to goals.
3) HR helps organizations adapt to changing work environments through skills assessment, motivation programs, change management strategies, and integrated HR systems that support each other and organizational transformation.
The resource based view and value- the customer-based view of the firmtamoni
This article discusses exploring the customer perspective of a firm's valuable resources, which has received less attention than the firm's own perspective in resource-based view research. The authors conducted a trial depth interview with a key customer to understand how customers assess a firm's resources. The interview indicated subtle differences between how customers and producers rank valued skills and capabilities. Further research is needed, but understanding the customer perspective could help firms better focus on resources truly valued by customers to achieve competitive advantage.
Explicating resource-based view critiques from a competitive heterogeneity p...Kevin Rommen
The resource-based theory of competitive advantage received stiff critiques during the years, and research discovered several weaknesses. By incorporating resource-based view into competitive heterogeneity we’ll try to weaken common critiques and strengthen the applicability of resource-based view in creating sustainable competitive advantage.
This document outlines nine best practices for effective talent management. It discusses how talent management has become a critical organizational function and competitive advantage. Organizations must identify talent gaps, develop a talent management plan integrated with business strategies, and ensure accurate hiring, promotion, performance management, and development. Effective talent management leads to higher business performance, earnings, and financial outcomes. It is driven by factors such as changing employee and demographic trends, increasing complexity, and expectations from boards and investors for leadership to create value through talent.
Achieving sustainable competitive advantage through resource configurIAEME Publication
This document summarizes a research paper that examines how organizations can achieve sustainable competitive advantage through resource configuration and organizational identity. The paper aims to develop a model for the information technology industry showing how organizational learning, knowledge management, and innovation lead to sustainable competitive advantage when mediated by resource configuration and organizational identity. It reviews literature on sustainable competitive advantage and discusses key theoretical constructs like knowledge management, organizational learning, innovation, resource configuration, and organizational identity.
This document reviews three schools of thought on what sources are likely to be the source of business success: the resource-based view, competence-based view, and dynamic capabilities view. It also discusses criticisms of the resource-based view, which is the most widely used model. Specifically, it outlines 13 criticisms of the resource-based view's VRIO framework, including that it does not fully explain how resources create strategic value and that the framework is not implementable in practice. The document concludes that resources alone cannot create competitive advantage and that dynamic capabilities need to be designed and continuously improved to achieve new advantages.
Strategic human resource management in a changing environmentManoah Baal
Strategic human resource management in a changing environment Chapter 02. A class discussion in Human resource management The process of hiring and developing employees so that they become more valuable to the organization
This document discusses two main perspectives on how information technology contributes to business performance: the market-driven perspective and the resource-based view. It proposes a model that combines these perspectives by showing how both IT support for business strategy and IT support for firm assets impact firm performance. The model was tested via a survey of 96 small and medium enterprises.
A heterogeneous resource based view for exploring relationships between firm ...tamoni
This article explores relationships between firm capabilities and performance using a heterogeneous resource-based view. The authors develop a latent structure regression model to identify clusters of firms that employ different paths to achieve performance based on capabilities. Applying this methodology to 216 US firms, they find a four group solution statistically dominates modeling the sample as one group, suggesting heterogeneity. The four groups provide different insights into how capabilities relate to performance for different industries and strategic types of firms.
This document discusses trends in human resource management (HRM), including outsourcing certain HR functions to reduce costs and focus internal resources on more strategic activities. It also addresses managing a diverse workforce, promoting employee wellness through programs like EAPs and EWPs, and developing talent strategies to attract and retain top performers in a competitive environment. Effective diversity management and a focus on total employee well-being are highlighted as important for organizational success.
Today, no one is safe from forces and pressures, which are exerted on it, because of a significant number of
the requirements in particular as regards competitiveness,the need for change, or the crises and the
deregulations. In front of the economic and social turbulences which we know, the creation of new
company appears as a cause of general interest. This research papers focuses on the problem of the
entrepreneurship, and more particularly on the stake which this domain represents in our society, by
treating the entrepreneurial teams as an opportunity for success the entrepreneurial project. To face this,
entrepreneur must reconsider their behaviors and their practices to renew themselves, to open out and
reinforce their position in the market. Some of these practices form what one calls the entrepreneurial
orientation. For this reason, we will devote this paper for better encircling and apprehending the concept of
entrepreneurial team. We focused on review literature through a survey of a sample of entrepreneurs from
Tunisia.
This document provides an excerpt from a chapter on leadership from the book "Managing and Leading People" published by CIPD. It discusses the differences and similarities between leadership and management. Leadership is described as setting direction and inspiring people, while management focuses more on planning, organizing and problem-solving. The chapter outlines several theoretical frameworks for studying leadership, including traits, behaviors, styles and situational approaches. It explains how these theories can help understand strategic vs operational leadership in organizations.
Mc Kinsey Making Talent A Strategic Priorityina_rasheva
Making talent a strategic priority remains an ongoing challenge for companies. While many have invested heavily in HR systems, talent issues are still not adequately addressed and seen as a long-term strategic issue requiring senior management attention. There are also several external factors like demographic changes, globalization, and the rise of knowledge workers that are intensifying the war for talent. Companies also bear some responsibility due to short-term thinking that diverts attention from long-term talent planning. Moving forward, companies need to view talent management as a core business strategy and address the needs of talent at all levels, not just top performers.
This document provides statistics on key digital media trends including mobile phone and mobile commerce usage, connected TV households, digital video and music consumption, social media usage among millennials, and online display advertising impressions. It highlights declining pay-TV penetration and growing numbers of people using digital formats across video, audio, and television as well as rising time spent on social platforms. Generational demographic data on millennials is also presented.
Johnny Depp has had a successful career as an American actor spanning over 30 years. Some of his most notable roles include Edward Scissorhands, Jack Sparrow in Pirates of the Caribbean, and Sweeney Todd. He has won several accolades for his acting performances, including Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild awards. Depp became interested in acting after being inspired by a close friend and enjoying several of his early movies as a teenager.
The document describes a Standard Test Data Yield Analysis tool that enables test engineers to perform fast yield analysis and process characterization using standard semiconductor test data files (STDF) without requiring a database. The tool's main features include distribution plots, box plots, parametric wafer maps, Pareto charts, raw data views, software/hardware bin fails, test synopses, and yield information. A benchmark compares the tool to accessing data via a database, showing the tool provides immediate access and analysis capabilities without additional steps or waiting.
This document discusses the growing threat of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) like cancer, heart disease, diabetes and chronic lung disease in South Africa. It notes that while strong healthcare systems are important, prevention must also be prioritized through multi-sectoral efforts targeting risk factors like diet, physical activity, tobacco and alcohol use. Prevention interventions outside the health system, such as taxes, food reformulation, and health promotion in schools and workplaces can help curb NCDs in a cost-effective manner. South Africa needs to develop evidence-based prevention strategies tailored to its specific challenges in order to stem the rising social and economic costs of NCDs.
This document provides tips for creating successful internet marketing campaigns from home. It recommends thoroughly researching your target audience and using that information to increase conversions and effectiveness. Some specific tips include using the word "fast" to appeal to people's value of time over money, keeping your website simple so it can be accessed by all, and incorporating limited time offers to encourage urgency in purchases. The document stresses the importance of constant learning and adapting to changes in internet marketing strategies.
The document discusses research on the human resource management practices of 60 large multinational companies. It finds that more successful MNCs had flexible policies and practices, included HR as a strategic partner, and developed global leaders. These companies recognized that to compete globally, organizations must adapt their human assets as readily as other business areas. Flexible practices allowed for cultural variation across countries while upholding core values like non-discrimination. Effective global HR management contributed to stronger financial performance.
M M Bagali, PhD, Research paper, MBA Faculty, HRM, HR, HRD, PhD in HR and Man...dr m m bagali, phd in hr
This document describes the research methodology used in a study on employee empowerment. The study was conducted at Polyhydron Private Limited in India, with the goal of understanding how innovative workplace policies and practices can empower employees and improve organizational performance. The methodology included administering questionnaires to all 73 employees to collect data on empowerment practices. The data was collected in three stages, including observation, discussion, and pooling responses. The study aimed to test hypotheses about how empowerment improves individual and organizational outcomes.
InstructionsArticle Application Essays Per course schedule (com.docxdirkrplav
Instructions:
Article Application Essays Per course schedule (computer-printed copy, beginning of class) 2 to 3 hours per essay 50 each Five point per day deduction 40 points content and application, 10 points writing (clear, concise, correct)
This assignment will introduce you to two articles from the field of strategic management. In addition, you will research and select one additional article. For each article, prepare a one-page application essay. Avoid summarizing the article. Instead, identify key concepts in the article that are particularly meaningful in context of your current (or past) organization. Explain why the concepts are significant to you and how you could apply them. You can also make application to the Capstone simulation.
Formatting requirements:
1. 12 point font, 1-inch margins.
2. Name, date, and article citation at the top of the paper; use APA style for article citation.
3. Left justified, single space within paragraphs, double space between paragraphs.
The student essay on the following page provides an example of both content and format.
Note the formatting below represents correct APA style.
Article One
Porter, M.E. (1996, November-December). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 61-78.
Strategy and the
Chief Learning Officer
Millbrook Distribution Services
Verna J. Willis and Gary L. May
In the views of the originator of the chief learning officer (CLO) concept—
Willis—and the first practitioner—May—the role a CLO must fulfill is dif-
ferent from a knowledge manager’s role. A CLO is much more deeply
engaged in the social learning and social communication processes that make
a learning organization. Many honest effor ts have been made to untangle
the roots of the CLO concept, the intended purpose, the qualifications, and
above all, the future of the position. Here the pioneers write to set the record
straight, discussing how the role of the CLO was conceived, where and why
it was implemented, and what it has meant for Millbrook Distribution Ser-
vices. They demonstrate that the CLO role is not just a Fortune 500 phe-
nomenon, but has application to smaller companies as well.
Background
The chief learning officer is fast becoming a strategic, lead
player in the drama of today’s business organizations. The histori-
cal nature of the Millbrook case study makes it important to set the
stage a bit differently. Theor y is often born and gains its credibil-
ity through interplay with practitioner experience, and this is the
situation with the Millbrook case. Thus theor y about the practice
of a CLO as well as the real-world practice itself play balanced parts
in how the case has developed and how the position of the CLO at
Millbrook continues to evolve.
Willis first articulated the need for a CLO in a 1991 article pub-
lished in the fledgling Human Resource Development Quarterly. This
Strategy and the Chief Learning Officer 1
This case was prepared to serve as a basis for discussion rather than to il.
This document summarizes a case study of problems faced by a large financial organization in Pakistan in managing its human resources, specifically its Management Trainee Program. Interviews with 45 management trainees revealed issues like lack of proper on-the-job training, trivial work assignments, long working hours, and lack of pay increases despite high demand and better compensation elsewhere in the industry. This led to low morale, increased turnover, and a "mutiny" among trainees. The case was analyzed through the lenses of motivation theories like equity theory, Herzberg's theory, Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory, expectancy theory, and McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y. It was found that trainees felt undervalued compared to peers elsewhere,
Unit 1 Module 1 - Virtues and Drawbacks of Organized Activity.docxwillcoxjanay
Unit 1: Module 1 - Virtues and Drawbacks of Organized Activity
Virtues and Drawbacks of Organized Activity
The establishment of large, complex organizations is historically recent. Today, much of society's important work is done in or by organizations. Many organizations really play their roles well, providing good jobs, producing safe and reliable products, developing their workforce, and fulfilling their social responsibility. However, without the right leadership and good decision-making, they may produce poor service, and defective and dangerous products.
We have recently seen corporations tarnishing their reputations by exploiting people and communities, and by damaging the environment. In some cases, people chosen to lead organizations seem to be clueless of what is really going on and how to keep an organization in good shape, or how to turn it into a successful one.
One way to avoid the negative effects of organized activity and, therefore, improve performance, is through reframing or viewing situations from multiple perspectives. Reframing offers cognitive lenses on the world that affects what you see and what it means.
This course introduces a framework consisting of the following four basic lenses or frames for strengthening managerial diagnosis and action:
· Structural Frame: It focuses on the architecture of organization—the design of units and subunits, rules and roles, goals and policies—that shape, and channel decisions and activities.
· Human Resource Frame: It emphasizes that management requires an understanding of people with their strengths and foibles, reasons and emotions, and desires and fears.
· Political Frame: It depicts that organizations are considered competitive arenas characterized by scarce resources, competing interests, and struggles for power and advantage.
· Symbolic Frame: It focuses on issues of meaning and faith.
Key Words for the Four Frames
Frame
Key Words
Structural Frame
Goals, task, technology, rationality, environment, rules, roles, linkages, differentiation, integration
Human Resource Frame
Needs, skills, feelings, motivation, satisfaction, norms, interpersonal interactions, fit (between person and organization)
Political Frame
Power, conflict, coalitions, scarcity, enduring differences, politics, bargaining, negotiation
Symbolic Frame
Symbols, meaning, belief, faith, culture, ceremonies, rituals, myths, stories, play
Unit 1: Module 1 - Managerial Thinking
Managerial Thinking
Before becoming managers and leaders, professionals develop their qualifications by learning from others and developing their own managerial style and interpersonal skills. This formation can be biased by those who play an important role on each individual’s development process.
When each one of those individuals takes charge, they carry all that into their performance and leadership style. Some are overwhelmed by the new responsibilities and “freeze” before the many challenges they face. It is also usual that manager ...
Assignment Practical Business Problem Solving TopicBusiness.docxrock73
Assignment: Practical Business Problem Solving Topic
Business research can help managers plan strategies by – identifying the existence of problems or opportunities present in the organization.
—William G. Zikmund, Barry J. Babin, John C. Carr,
and Mitch Griffith, Business Research Methods
Despite having general areas of academic interest, many doctoral independent scholars find choosing a specific topic for their research study a challenge. In addition to making an academic contribution, your work will address a real-world business problem and have the potential to impact the daily practices of the business community. Writing and researching a Doctoral Study is an opportunity for you to explore a topic of interest, identify a problem, and express your viewpoint and perspective as your ideas evolve by way of you learning more about the topic and about your own questions and hypotheses.
Your past professional experience can be a valuable source for identifying a research topic during the initial stages of your search. You should also review the literature on topics of interest. Finding a practical business problem, for which your in-depth academic research efforts may help you uncover possible solutions, is a critical first step in a successful doctoral process.
To prepare for this Assignment, review the media piece “Choosing Your Doctoral Topic.” Consider a topic you might be interested in studying and a potential question for future research. Note: This is not the time to talk about the specifics of your Doctoral Study but rather to describe generally your topic of interest and why you have chosen it. This will acquaint the reader (or listener) with your study topic. Also keep in mind that many early doctoral independent scholars tend to focus on solutions. Instead, focus on clearly articulating a known business-related problem and not a social problem.
Submit a 2- to 3-page paper (excluding cover and References pages) in which you formulate one or more business problems on your chosen topic. In your paper, do the following:
· Provide an overview of the topic you are interested in studying, including the context and your rationale for selecting your topic.
· Delineate a brief history of this area of study and the relevancy of this topic in today’s business world.
· Identify any similarities between your interests and those discussed in the media piece “Choosing Your Doctoral Topic.”
· Devise one or more business-related problems related to your chosen topic.
Economics and Business
______________________________________________________________________________________________ 2014 / 26
15
Influence of Dynamic Capabilities in Creating
Disruptive Innovation
Rūta Čiutienė1, Emil William Thattakath2, 1, 2 Kaunas University of Technology
Abstract ‒ The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the
influence of Dynamic Capabilities in creating Disruptive
Innovation. For doing so the concepts of Dynamic Capabilities
and Disrup ...
Workplace Diversity, Advancing The World Of WorkLakesia Wright
The document discusses how organizations can develop their human capital to better execute strategic plans. It argues that human capital should be at the core of strategy, rather than an afterthought. An effective approach integrates three elements: talent optimization to align workforce with strategy, promoting learning agility through collaboration, and developing innovation capabilities. By focusing on these areas and making human capital central, organizations can build an agile workforce that drives strategic change through creativity and new ideas.
1 week 1 discussion 1 human capital & organizational goals ssusera34210
This summary provides the key information from the document in 3 sentences:
The document discusses the emerging field of strategic human capital and the opportunity it has to close the gap between theory and practice. It argues that strategic human capital researchers should deeply engage with real-world phenomena and look for situations where existing theories fail to explain reality, in order to generate new, useful theories. The document then uses firm-specific human capital theory as an example to illustrate how assumptions in academic theories sometimes do not match the lived experiences of managers.
mm bagali...... mba...... research......management......hrm......hrd........dr m m bagali, phd in hr
This document describes the research methodology for a study on employee empowerment. The study was conducted at Polyhydron Private Limited, an engineering company in India. The study used an exploratory and descriptive research design to understand innovative strategies that make top companies different, such as empowering employees. The study tested hypotheses about how empowerment improves organizational achievement, shapes positive attitudes, and is related to access to information. The scope was to understand what policy, people or workplace practices create an empowered organization and workforce. Data was collected through questionnaires and interviews of employees, including the CEO, at Polyhydron Private Limited.
Dynamic capabilities allow organizations to sense opportunities, seize opportunities, and transform themselves. They consist of microfoundations like routines, methodologies, and individual acts. Microfoundations include routines for sensing opportunities, as well as non-routine acts by leaders. Effective microfoundations balance routines with non-routine innovation. Research studies both the nature of individual microfoundations and their complex interactions.
Organizational life cycle:
Organizational Birth,
Population Ecology Model of Organizational Birth, The Institutional Theory of Organizational Growth, Greiner’s Model of Organizational Growth,
Organizational Decline and Death,
Weitzel and Jonsson’s Model of Organizational Decline
2013 building the_right_high_potential_pool_white_papertheglobalist2003
This document discusses how organizations define, assess, and calibrate their high potential talent pools. It begins by outlining the challenges of an aging workforce and intense competition for skilled talent. It then examines how leading organizations define high potentials, focusing on an individual's potential for future roles with greater scale and scope, strong performance while upholding company values, and key competencies. These include cognitive and personality foundations, growth factors like learning orientation, and career indicators like leadership capabilities. The document provides frameworks for defining high potentials and assessing them using multiple dimensions. It also notes that high performers are not always high potentials, and potential must be evaluated separately from performance.
Engagement & empowerment are key to fostering cultures which THRIVE on change and unleash human & profit potential--in the corporation, classroom or community
This document discusses the importance of investing in people through effective human capital management practices. It argues that a competent and committed workforce can provide strategic advantages for microfinance institutions. The document outlines some common people challenges faced by MFIs, such as developing future leaders, rapidly developing workforce skills, and fostering knowledge sharing. It also discusses lessons from the recent microfinance crisis in India, highlighting the role of human capital practices. The document then provides recommendations for MFIs to maximize the value of their employees, including hiring the right people, planning for future needs, leveraging strengths, and creating opportunities for learning.
This document provides instructions for a 3-4 page paper assignment on strategic human resource management. It lists the following requirements:
- Explain how HR professionals exhibit transformational leadership.
- Discuss how diversity can improve an organization and obstacles encountered.
- List and discuss HR manager functions and how they help recruit employees.
- Include a cover page, abstract, and 2-3 references excluding Wikipedia.
- Cite sources in APA style within the text and in a references section.
- Avoid plagiarism.
This document discusses the importance of talent management in business strategy. It reviews literature on the topic and finds that talent management plays a key role in modern organizational strategies. Specifically:
1) Talent management helps organizations discover and utilize the unique behavioral attributes of human resources, which can contribute greatly to an organization's value if harnessed effectively.
2) Recent literature emphasizes that organizations must develop their intellectual talent pools in order to grow and improve performance according to changing global business needs.
3) Talent management has become a critical aspect of organizational development, as the global competition for top talent has intensified over the last decade and will continue doing so. Developing and retaining talent is seen as worth fighting for.
This document is the final exam for a course on managing organizations and human resources. It asks students to identify and evaluate three human resource practices that can create competitive advantage. The document includes an abstract and sections on recruitment and training of employees, rewards, participative structures, and conclusions. It reviews literature showing that effective HR practices like rigorous selection, training, comprehensive incentives, and participative decision-making can increase employee motivation and performance when bundled together systematically. Recruiting the right employees and providing ongoing training is identified as important for competitive advantage, as is implementing reward systems like pay-for-performance to enhance motivation.
Corporate Strategy in a Global EconomySession 2 Firm Dynamic Ca.docxvanesaburnand
Corporate Strategy in a Global Economy
Session 2: Firm Dynamic Capability Analysis
Recall from the last session that a major tension in business-level strategy is whether it should be resource-driven or market-driven. In the second session, we will explore the content of strategic advantage in terms of the role of resources.
Disney has several businesses. Its success across these businesses is founded on three key resource portfolios that are all difficult to substitute for any competing firm:
· a large library of content that the whole world knows and emotionally connects with
· a large portfolio of synergistic objects to build emotional connections upon
· many different ways and places to promote its products
These portfolios are based on several resources, of which two are particularly difficult to imitate: a culture focused on innovating around fun and a brand name that engages all stakeholders around its mission to deliver fun.
Research on the resource-driven strategic advantage has identified four major hypotheses:
a) First, strategic advantage is a function of resource portfolios. This is resource-based view of strategy.
b) Second, strategic advantage is a function of resource portfolios plus capabilities, i.e. how valuable resource portfolios are acquired, configured, and deployed. This is knowledge-based view of strategy.
c) Third, strategic advantage is a function of capabilities plus core competencies, i.e. how capabilities are coordinated and integrated across boundaries to generate a series of innovations and applications. This is core-competence view of strategy.
d) Fourth, strategic advantage is a function of core competencies plus renewing of competencies, i.e. how new sets of capabilities are constructed and existing transformed to adapt to the changing technologies and markets. This is dynamic capability view of strategy.
More recent research examines the role of micro foundations, i.e. the structure, process and behavior characteristics underpinning the transformation of resources, capabilities, and core competencies.
Resource-based view is concerned with the substitutability and imitability of a firm’s unique and valuable resource portfolios by its competitors. It is applied using Barney’s VRIN framework, or what we modify as NIRV framework. In the NIRV framework, one examines if the key resource portfolios of a firm are difficult to substitute and difficult to imitate. If yes, then one examines if the firm has a unique or rare advantage in the marketplace, and if the firm is able to accrue sufficient value in the marketplace. Thus, one examines the characteristics of both inputs and outcomes.
In resource-based view, sustainability of a firm’s strategic advantage is threatened by two factors – substitution risk and imitation risk – i.e. how likely are the other firms to substitute or imitate a firm’s key resource portfolios? A firm is able to sustain its unique and valuable advantage if there are b.
The document summarizes key points from a Harvard Business Review article about reinventing management for a volatile world. It discusses how modern management principles from the late 19th/early 20th century may have reached their limits of improvement. A group of scholars and CEOs created 25 "moon shot" challenges to focus efforts on reinventing management. Some of the top challenges included ensuring work serves a higher purpose beyond shareholder wealth, embedding ideas of community/citizenship, and reducing fear/increasing trust in organizations.
GridMate - End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid...ThomasParaiso2
End to end testing is a critical piece to ensure quality and avoid regressions. In this session, we share our journey building an E2E testing pipeline for GridMate components (LWC and Aura) using Cypress, JSForce, FakerJS…
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!SOFTTECHHUB
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FMESafe Software
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
Sudheer Mechineni, Head of Application Frameworks, Standard Chartered Bank
Discover how Standard Chartered Bank harnessed the power of Neo4j to transform complex data access challenges into a dynamic, scalable graph database solution. This keynote will cover their journey from initial adoption to deploying a fully automated, enterprise-grade causal cluster, highlighting key strategies for modelling organisational changes and ensuring robust disaster recovery. Learn how these innovations have not only enhanced Standard Chartered Bank’s data infrastructure but also positioned them as pioneers in the banking sector’s adoption of graph technology.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Epistemic Interaction - tuning interfaces to provide information for AI supportAlan Dix
Paper presented at SYNERGY workshop at AVI 2024, Genoa, Italy. 3rd June 2024
https://alandix.com/academic/papers/synergy2024-epistemic/
As machine learning integrates deeper into human-computer interactions, the concept of epistemic interaction emerges, aiming to refine these interactions to enhance system adaptability. This approach encourages minor, intentional adjustments in user behaviour to enrich the data available for system learning. This paper introduces epistemic interaction within the context of human-system communication, illustrating how deliberate interaction design can improve system understanding and adaptation. Through concrete examples, we demonstrate the potential of epistemic interaction to significantly advance human-computer interaction by leveraging intuitive human communication strategies to inform system design and functionality, offering a novel pathway for enriching user-system engagements.
How to Get CNIC Information System with Paksim Ga.pptxdanishmna97
Pakdata Cf is a groundbreaking system designed to streamline and facilitate access to CNIC information. This innovative platform leverages advanced technology to provide users with efficient and secure access to their CNIC details.
Removing Uninteresting Bytes in Software FuzzingAftab Hussain
Imagine a world where software fuzzing, the process of mutating bytes in test seeds to uncover hidden and erroneous program behaviors, becomes faster and more effective. A lot depends on the initial seeds, which can significantly dictate the trajectory of a fuzzing campaign, particularly in terms of how long it takes to uncover interesting behaviour in your code. We introduce DIAR, a technique designed to speedup fuzzing campaigns by pinpointing and eliminating those uninteresting bytes in the seeds. Picture this: instead of wasting valuable resources on meaningless mutations in large, bloated seeds, DIAR removes the unnecessary bytes, streamlining the entire process.
In this work, we equipped AFL, a popular fuzzer, with DIAR and examined two critical Linux libraries -- Libxml's xmllint, a tool for parsing xml documents, and Binutil's readelf, an essential debugging and security analysis command-line tool used to display detailed information about ELF (Executable and Linkable Format). Our preliminary results show that AFL+DIAR does not only discover new paths more quickly but also achieves higher coverage overall. This work thus showcases how starting with lean and optimized seeds can lead to faster, more comprehensive fuzzing campaigns -- and DIAR helps you find such seeds.
- These are slides of the talk given at IEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, ICSTW 2022.
1. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Author(s): Charles A. O'Reilly III and Michael L. Tushman
Reviewed work(s):
Source: California Management Review, Vol. 53, No. 4 (Summer 2011), pp. 5-22
Published by: University of California Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5 .
Accessed: 27/11/2011 04:22
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
California Management Review.
http://www.jstor.org
2. Organizational
Ambidexterity in Action:
How Managers Explore
and Exploit
Charles A. O’Reilly III
Michael L. Tushman
T
he life span of the average American is 79. Japanese can expect
to live to age 83, Liberians to only 46. The average age of a large
company is much less than any of these. Research has shown that
only a tiny fraction of firms founded in the U.S. are likely to make
it to age 40, probably less than 0.1 percent.1 In this study, for firms founded in
1976, only 10% survived 10 years later, leading the authors to conclude that
“Despite their size, their vast financial and human resources, average large firms
do not ‘live’ as long as ordinary Americans.”2 While this is partly understand-
able because of the high mortality rates among newly founded companies, other
research has estimated that even large, well-established companies can only
expect to live, on average, between another 6 to 15 years.3 Ormerod, in a study
of firm failure, noted that “Over 10 percent of all companies in the U.S., the
largest and most-successful economy in the history of the world, fail every single
year.”4 In a study of the world’s largest companies between 1912 and 1995,
Hannah reported that only 20 firms remained on her list for the entire period—
and many of those were in industries like natural resources without disruptive
change. In her study, the modal large firm failed.5 Why this should be is a puz-
zle, since when firms are doing well they have all the resources (financial, physi-
cal, and intellectual) to continue to be successful. Yet the evidence is that most
organizations do not survive for long periods of time.
In addressing this conundrum, James March notes that central to the abil-
ity of a firm to survive over time is its ability to exploit existing assets and posi-
tions in a profit-producing way and simultaneously to explore new technologies
and markets—to configure and reconfigure organizational resources to capture
existing as well as new opportunities. In March’s terms, this is the fundamen-
tal tension at the heart of an enterprise’s long-run survival. “The basic problem
confronting an organization is to engage in sufficient exploitation to ensure its
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 5
3. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
current viability and, at the same time, devote enough energy to exploration
to ensure its future viability.”6 March also notes that this requires not the blind
variation-selection-retention process of biological evolution but what he refers
to as “evolutionary engineering” in which organizational experience and mem-
ory are used to strengthen exploitation and exploration processes and adapt to
changed environmental conditions.7 Hannah, struggling to explain the survival
of a comparatively small number of the world’s largest companies, suggests that
a plausible explanation for the survivors is that “they had some distinctive archi-
tecture which enabled them—but not others—to constantly replicate their early
success [and that] such corporate architectures must be complex and difficult to
identify, describe and copy, for, if that were not the case, their value would be
competed down by emulators.”8
In the past decade, a growing body of research has examined how orga-
nizations can both explore and exploit.9 One promising stream of research has
focused on how dynamic capabilities may underpin the ability of firms to sense,
seize, and reconfigure organizational assets to adapt to changed environmental
conditions.10 With dynamic capabilities, sustained competitive advantage comes
from the firm’s ability to leverage and reconfigure its existing competencies and
assets in ways that are valuable to the customer but difficult for competitors to
imitate. In this view, dynamic capabilities are embedded in organizational pro-
cesses or routines around coordination, learning, and transformation and allow
a firm to sense opportunities and then to seize them by successfully allocating
resources, often by adjusting existing competencies or developing new ones.
These capabilities underpin the organization’s ability to maintain ecological fit-
ness and, when necessary, to reconfigure existing assets and develop the new
skills needed to address emerging threats and opportunities
The Roots of Organizational Ambidexterity
O’Reilly and Tushman argue that the ability of a firm to be ambidextrous
is at the core of dynamic capabilities. Ambidexterity requires senior managers
to accomplish two critical tasks.11 First, they must be able to accurately sense
changes in their competitive environment,
Charles A. O’Reilly III is the Frank Buck including potential shifts in technology, compe-
Professor of Management at the Graduate tition, customers, and regulation. Second, they
School of Business at Stanford University. must be able to act on these opportunities and
<oreilly_charles@gsb.stanford.edu>
threats; to be able to seize them by reconfigur-
Michael L. Tushman is the Paul Lawrence
ing both tangible and intangible assets to meet
MBA Class of 1942 Professor of Business
Administration at the Harvard Business new challenges.12 As a dynamic capability, ambi-
School. <mtushman@hbs.edu> dexterity embodies a complex set of routines
including decentralization, differentiation, tar-
geted integration, and the ability of senior leadership to orchestrate the complex
trade-offs that the simultaneous pursuit of exploration and exploitation requires.
Developing these dynamic capabilities is a central task of executive leadership.
6
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
4. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Although theoretically compelling, research on dynamic capabilities
and ambidexterity is still at an early stage. Conceptually, the need for organiza-
tions to both explore and exploit is convincing, but how do managers and firms
actually do this? At an operating level, how do the challenges of ambidexterity
present themselves—and what differentiates the more successful attempts at
ambidexterity from the less successful? To develop a more granular sense for the
managerial challenges presented by ambidexterity, consider the following three
examples.
Mike Lawrie at Misys
In 2007, Mike Lawrie was appointed CEO of Misys, a $1B FTSE 100
global supplier of software and services to banking and health care customers.
Although Misys had been a star performer earlier in its history, by 2006 the firm
was in trouble with margins and growth rates far below their competitors. It had
grown through acquisitions and was a loose federation of 34 separate business
units with 6,000 employees spread across 79 countries.
Part of Lawrie’s turnaround strategy was straightforward: to install com-
mon practices across the business units to reduce costs and drive productivity.
As a 27-year veteran of IBM and former CEO of Siebel Systems, Lawrie knew
how to do this. More problematic was the potential disruptive challenge posed
by open source software, which threatened the proprietary products from which
Misys derived most of its current revenue. However, given the poor financial
position of the company, Lawrie’s senior team was focused on cutting costs and
getting through the immediate crisis. With their legacy business and their pow-
erful business unit managers under cost, quality, and growth pressures, open
source experiments were seen as a needless distraction and a $300M cost. They
questioned whether the company should divert scarce resources to fund an
uncertain new initiative that, if successful, could undermine their current busi-
ness model? In addition, if they were to do this, how should the new venture
be organized and led?
Ganesh Natarajan at Zensar Technologies
Zensar Technologies is one of India’s top 25 business process outsourcing
companies proving services to 300 of the Fortune 500 firms. In 2005, its business
was growing but Ganesh Natarajan, the CEO, saw the opportunity to implement
a potentially radical software process innovation (Solution Blue Prints or SBP).
SBP was a revolutionary way to do software development that, if implemented,
would require a more collaborative relationship with clients, a different product
development framework, and a different sales process.
Zensar’s existing customers, its top team, its sales force and its product
development staff were not enthusiastic about SBP. Like Mike Lawrie’s team at
Misys, Natarajan’s senior team and business unit leaders were preoccupied with
their current business and saw little need to explore an approach that would
require them to alter their current business model. When pressed by Natarajan
to explore the new approach to software development, several senior managers
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 7
5. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
suggested that SBP simply be integrated into their existing units. Others wanted
SBP to be spun out as a new venture. In contrast, the leader of the SBP project
wanted to have his own business unit reporting directly to the CEO. As Natara-
jan reflected on the challenge, he was sure that the company should pursue SBP
but was unsure how to structure the new initiative to best ensure its success.
Caroline White at Defense Corp
Defense Corp (pseudonym) is a major U.S. defense contractor with
long-term relationships with customers in the military. Caroline White, a vice
president and general manager of a division, saw an attractive opportunity for
growth in the new Homeland Security market but was frustrated in her efforts
to develop this area. Her mission, approved by the President, was to create a
franchise in this business equivalent to those it enjoyed in other defense mar-
kets. In spite of this high-level approval, Caroline found funding difficult, with
the business development funds budgeted by supporting units never available in
the amounts promised. Instead, these seem to be siphoned off to support more
near-term opportunities with existing clients.
When Caroline pressed her colleagues in other business units about this,
she heard complaints about her new initiative. They saw her mission as less
tangible and immediate than theirs, with a smaller payoff to investment, and
labeled her effort as a “think tank” as opposed to a real business. They also com-
plained that her project lacked clarity around deliverables and metrics. Making
matters more difficult, line of business leaders were under significant pressure to
deliver revenues and questioned the viability of Caroline’s efforts. In the face of
these obstacles, Caroline was resolved to ask the CEO to intercede. The question,
however, was what she wanted him to do to ensure the viability of her explor-
atory effort? Given the resistance, she knew that it would require more than just
funding to ensure the success of the new initiative.
Mike Lawrie, Ganesh Natarajan and Caroline White each face the clas-
sic explore-exploit dilemma. What specifically can they do? At a high level of
abstraction, ambidexterity requires a willingness of senior managers to commit
resources to exploratory projects and the establishment of separate structural
units for exploitation and exploration. Most research on ambidexterity begins
with the acceptance of these general characteristics.13 However, while there is
general agreement about the elements of ambidexterity, O’Reilly and Tushman
have noted that what is missing is a clear articulation of those specific manage-
ment actions that facilitate the simultaneous pursuit of exploitation and explora-
tion. What has been missing from the research on ambidexterity is insight into
the core leadership mechanisms that underlie how dynamic capabilities operate
in practice.
Thus, while directionally correct, the research is not granular enough to
be of much use to an operating manager facing the problems described above.
To be practically useful, what is needed is greater insight into the specific micro-
mechanisms required for a manager to implement and operate an ambidextrous
strategy. This article reports the results of interviews and qualitative case studies
8
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
6. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
of leaders in 15 organizations that were confronted with the need to simultane-
ously explore and exploit. We use these data to induce how managers actually
dealt with the challenges of ambidexterity. In doing this, we also explored those
activities that discriminated between those more- versus less-successful attempts
at implementing ambidextrous designs.
Leading the Ambidextrous Organization
In an attempt to characterize the specific elements of ambidexterity, we
offer five propositions that are necessary for leaders to be successful at manag-
ing ambidexterity.14 These are specific mechanisms that enable firms to success-
fully manage separate “explore-and-exploit” subunits and to leverage common
assets in ways that permit the firm to adapt to new opportunities and threats. It
is the presence of these characteristics that permits leaders to reconfigure exist-
ing competencies and assets to explore new opportunities even as the organiza-
tion continues to compete in mature markets. Absent these elements, inertial
forces keep the firm focused on the exploitative part of the business.15 Thus, we
propose that ambidexterity is more likely to be successful in the presence of the
following five conditions:
b A compelling strategic intent that intellectually justifies the importance
of both exploration and exploitation.
b An articulation of a common vision and values that provide for a com-
mon identity across the exploitative and exploratory units.
b A senior team that explicitly owns the unit’s strategy of exploration and
exploitation; there is a common-fate reward system; and the strategy is
communicated relentlessly.
b Separate but aligned organizational architectures (business models, struc-
ture, incentives, metrics, and cultures) for the exploratory and exploit-
ative units and targeted integration at both senior and tactical levels to
properly leverage organizational assets.
b The ability of the senior leadership to tolerate and resolve the tensions
arising from separate alignments.
To appreciate the logic of these, consider the effects on ambidexterity
if these elements were not present. First, without an intellectually compelling
strategic intent to justify the ambidextrous form, there will be no rationale for
why profitable exploit units, especially those under pressure, should give up
resources to fund small, uncertain explore efforts. As previous research has
shown, managers routinely discount future threats and focus on short-term
gains at the expense of less certain long-term returns.16 Second, absent a com-
mon vision and values, there will be no common identity to promote trust,
cooperation, and a long-term perspective.17 Third, if the senior team lacks a
consensus about the importance of ambidexterity, those who are uncommit-
ted will be encouraged to resist the effort, diminishing cooperation, increas-
ing competition for resources, and slowing down execution.18 The absence
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 9
7. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
of a common-fate reward system and a lack of relentless communication of
the ambidextrous strategy can further undermine cooperation and encourage
unproductive conflict.19 Fourth, without separate alignments for explore and
exploit units and targeted integration to leverage common assets, there will be
inefficient use of resources and poor coordination across the units.20 Finally, if
the leadership is unable to manage the conflicts and trade-offs required by ambi-
dexterity, the necessary decision processes will be compromised and end up in
confusion and conflict.21
Method and Results
To assess whether these five propositions are veridical descriptions of
ambidexterity in practice, we conducted semi-structured interviews with senior
managers at fifteen firms that were attempting to manage both exploratory and
exploitative units. Eight of the 15 cases were either successes or qualified suc-
cesses as reflected in increased growth or profits, three were clear failures, and
four firms were underperforming before learning how to be ambidextrous and
deemed successful afterwards. Table 1 lists these companies and the challenge
each faced.
Senior managers and key informants in each firm were interviewed
and asked to describe in detail how they attempted to simultaneously explore
and exploit.22 They were probed about the nature of their leadership chal-
lenges, what actions they had taken, an assessment of their progress to date,
and to identify those elements that they believed were helping or hindering
them in accomplishing their task of exploration and exploitation. The focus in
these interviews was on understanding in some detail what actions had been
taken and how these had been implemented. The goal of these interviews was
to specify in a granular way what leadership actions were associated with the
organization’s ability to reconfigure existing assets and develop the new capabili-
ties needed for exploration.23 Table 2 provides a summary of the comparative
results across the fifteen organizations studied. These results suggest that there
are themes associated with the leadership of more- versus less-successful ambi
dextrous designs.
The first proposition offered by O’Reilly and Tushman suggests that ambi-
dexterity is facilitated when there is a compelling strategic intent that intellectu-
ally justifies the explore and exploit strategy. In each of the 15 cases investigated
here, there was a clear strategic intent on the part of the organization to pursue
an exploratory venture (this obviously reflects our sample selection where cases
were chosen based on their attempt to be ambidextrous). While each of the 15
firms articulated a strategic intent, only ten were able to actually execute such
an aspiration. The articulation of a clear strategic intent clearly does not discrim-
inate between more- versus less-successful attempts to implement ambidextrous
designs. Other research has documented the transformation of firms occurring
without an explicit ambidexterity strategy.24 These results suggest that while
10
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
8. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Table 1. Sample Description (continued on next page)
IBM Life Sciences (Success) IBM Middleware (Success)
In 2000, IBM began a programmatic effort, (termed the In 1998, IBM’s software division was in turmoil. There
Emerging Business Organization or EBO), to identify were conflicting pressures to continue to develop and
and develop cross-IBM business that could provide $1B service software for their existing installed base that
in revenue within a 5-year time frame. In April of that relied heavily on mainframe computers and to develop
year, Carol Kovac, an IBM R&D manager, was asked to radically new products based on the emerging World
establish a new Life Science business that would capitalize Wide Web. Resolving this required that their senior
on the increased demand for computing being generated managers exploit existing programming languages and
by the genomic revolution. Between its founding and customers and to explore new languages and markets.
2006, Carol grew the business to $5B in revenue. They accomplished this by systematically establishing
different units and carefully integrating them at senior
Cisco TelePresence (Success) levels.
Cisco Systems is a $22B company that sells plumbing Misys Corporation (Success)
for the internet. It has grown at 12-17% annually and
currently has a dominant market share in its main Misys is a $1B software firm selling service and systems
businesses. As a part of his effort to continue Cisco to health care and banking clients. As a part of a
Systems growth, John Chambers, the CEO, has launched turnaround effort commenced in 2007, the new CEO
an ambitious initiative to identify 30 new potential $1B initiated a cost-cutting effort in the mature business and
businesses. His aim is to generate 25% of the firm’s proposed a new open source approach to replace the
revenues from these new ventures within 5-10 years. In existing proprietary platform. To ensure the success of
October 2006, one of these efforts (TelePresence) was this disruptive approach, he set up a new exploratory
launched as an internal venture to develop high-end unit and replaced several members of his senior team
video conferencing. Since then the business has grown who were resisting the new approach. By 2010, the new
from two internal entrepreneurs and a sheet of paper open source platform had opened up new markets and
to more than 100 people and $200M in revenue. attracted a significant number of new customers.
DaVita Rx (Success) Defense Corp (Success)
DaVita is a $6B business that derives the bulk of its Defense Corp is a $6B provider of hardware and systems
revenues from operating kidney dialysis centers. In 2004, to the U.S. military establishment. In 2005, in an attempt
Kent Thiry, the CEO, formed a team to identify new to broaden their customer base the company initiated
business opportunities that would match DaVita’s clinical an effort to sell technology to the newly established
skills with economic opportunities. One opportunity Homeland Security Agency. Although the initiative
identified was to provide prescription drugs to chronic was approved by the CEO, development funding and
kidney patients. Begun in 2004, DaVita Rx was an cooperation from main lines of business were slow in
internal start-up with a different business model, metrics, coming until a separate unit was established with a clear
and margins than the larger DaVita. By 2010, this new charter, appropriate metrics, and an aligned senior team.
business was generating $220M in revenue with 400 The new unit recently won a $13M contract.
employees.
Zensar Technologies (Success)
Ciba Vision (Success)
In 2002, Zensar Technologies, a mid-sized Indian IT
In the early 1990s, Ciba Vision, a maker of soft contact services firm was losing market share and key talent.
lenses and lens solutions, was losing ground to their There was substantial tension between a potentially
larger competitors, J&J and Bausch and Lomb. In a bold promising new technology platform and the existing
move, Glenn Bradley, the President, halted all incremental geographical business units. A new CEO shifted Zensar
innovation and placed six bets on revolutionary new to a product-focused firm but kept the new technology
products such as extended wear lenses and daily venture as a business unit reporting to his office. In
disposables. These new units were encouraged to 2008, after the entrepreneurial unit’s technology and
establish their own alignments (people, structure, culture) business model was validated this unit and its innovative
as they pursued their breakthrough innovation. With the business model was integrated into the product units.
success of several of these, revenues tripled over the Over the five-year period, Zensar was able to build
next decade. its core business even as it brought to the market a
fundamentally new technology.
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 11
9. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Table 1. Sample Description (continued from previous page)
SAP Business-by-Design (Failure) HP Scanner (Declining to Success)
In 2006, the CEO of SAP declared that future revenue Beginning in 1991, HP’s scanner division had begun
growth for the company was in the Small and Medium to develop a portable scanner to complement their
Business market and selling software on demand. This flatbed product. For five years they had failed to
software-as-a-service product (Business-by-Design commercialize any of their inventions. In 1996, a new
or ByD) was developed but no separate unit was division GM separated out the handheld business into
established. Although this market has grown substantially, an ambidextrous unit that was physically separated from
SAP has failed to successfully market their offering. In the flatbed business and had its own people, systems,
2010, the CEO, Leo Apotheker, was fired for failing to incentives, and culture. Two years later, this business was
implement Business-by-Design. successful enough to be spun-out as its own division.
Printing Company (Failure) Turner Technologies
In 2007, faced with increased competition and declining (Declining to Success)
customer satisfaction and usage of their core legal The Advanced IC Division of Turner had issues of growth
research products, the senior managers of the business in new products as well as quality in its existing product
decided to reinvent their business as a web-based line. While the division’s strategic intent was clear, it could
publisher based on a new open source architecture. In not get traction on either performance issue until it
spite of a clear vision of the future, heavy investment split out the innovative strategic agenda from its existing
in the new technology, and a promise to “rescue the product line. Energized by two new managers reporting
company”, the new product has failed to reignite growth. the divisional GM and a rearticulated identity for the
The new unit has faced continual resistance from the division, Turner was able to both effectively explore and
more mature part of the business. exploit.
Software Company (Failure) IBM Network Technologies
Under pressure from corporate executives, the general (Declining to Success)
manager of Software Company articulated a strategic A highly entrepreneurial general manager articulated a
intent to both build on its struggling extant product line strategic intent to exploit her existing chip line even as
and initiate a remarkable set of new software solutions. she promised to explore into fundamentally new chips.
This general manager built a separate unit, reporting Yet her zeal for exploration led her to build a business
directly to him, to focus on innovation. Over a three-year unit only focused on exploration. Her extant product line
period, he did not, however, staff or fund this innovative suffered. Under pressure from corporate staff and client
unit. The unit underperformed in its existing as well as its dissatisfaction, the general manager rebuilt her senior
innovative product line. team and her business unit to focus attention on both
her current product as well as her new product lines.
USA Today (Declining to Success)
In the late 1990s, USA Today, like most U.S. newspapers,
began to see a decline in both circulation and advertising
revenues as web-based news began to supplant print. In
response to this trend, Tom Curley, the paper’s publisher,
adopted a “network strategy” which emphasized the
delivery of news content across three platforms, print,
the web, and TV. Between 1999 and 2002, he was
successful at managing this transition and simultaneously
delivering news content across the three platforms-with
the result that earnings increased by 50 percent.
12
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
10. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Table 2. Interview Results (continued on next page)
Strategic intent that intellectually
a common identity but separate
strategy (common-fate rewards,
Vision and values that promote
(conflict resolution, resource
integration (senior level and
justifies ambidextrous form
Separate units with aligned
architectures and targeted
Senior team that explicitly
Ambidextrous Leadership
owns the ambidextrous
Proposition 1
Proposition 2
Proposition 3
Proposition 4
Proposition 5
Performance
communication)
allocation)
Overall
cultures
tactical)
Success:
IBM Life Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Success—
Sciences 100% of EBO structure $5B in
bonus for revenue in
senior 6 years
executives
Cisco Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Success—
TelePresence 70% of bonus Council/Board $200M in
structure revenue in
4 years
DaVita Rx Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Success—
But some Geographically But some $220M in
initial separate conflict over revenue in
disputes over metrics and 6 years
autonomy rewards
Ciba Vision Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Success—
“Healthy Geographically Senior leader tripled sales
eyes for life” separate integrates in 10 years
Explore report
to senior team
IBM Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Success—
Middleware “Beat BEA” Senior leaders Geographically Senior leaders old and new
agree on a separate units integration products
new structure combined
Zensar Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Both profit
Technologies “Among the Distinct unit Tension held and growth
top Indian for new at top doubled
IT Services platform from 2005-
Firms” 2010
Misys Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Success—
Drive Replaced old Open source CEO drove developed
productivity team with reports to the new new platform
and new one CEO effort with new
innovate customers
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 13
11. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Table 2. Interview Results (continued from previous page, continued on next page)
Strategic intent that intellectually
a common identity but separate
strategy (common-fate rewards,
Vision and values that promote
(conflict resolution, resource
integration (senior level and
justifies ambidextrous form
Separate units with aligned
architectures and targeted
Senior team that explicitly
Ambidextrous Leadership
owns the ambidextrous
Proposition 1
Proposition 2
Proposition 3
Proposition 4
Proposition 5
Performance
communication)
allocation)
Overall
cultures
tactical)
Defense Yes No Yes Yes Yes Success—
Corp But did set After initial Unit reports to Used Won $13M
new explore resistance President consultant in new
culture to mediate contracts
conflict
Failure:
SAP Business- Yes No No No clear No Failure—
by-Design Disputes ambidextrous Continued lack of
over revenue unit or leader conflicts over penetration
recognition who owns the in targeted
customer markets
Printing Yes Yes No No No Failure—no
Company But the “Save the Short-term Explore unit Ambidextrous new growth
strategy company” revenue still not protected unit not
does dominates represented
not fit
well with
current
one
Software Co Yes No No Yes No Poor
Innovation
Performance
Transition to Success:
USA Today Yes Yes No to Yes Yes No to Yes Stalled to
“Network, Separate units Resource Success—
not a with targeted allocation to increased
newspaper” integration web-based earnings 50%
business in 3 years
H-P Scanner Yes No No then Yes No then Yes No to Yes Stalled to
Senior team Physically Senior leader Success—
bonus based separate units integrates then
on overall innovation
performance unit spun out
14
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
12. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Table 2. Interview Results (continued from previous page)
Strategic intent that intellectually
a common identity but separate
strategy (common-fate rewards,
Vision and values that promote
(conflict resolution, resource
integration (senior level and
justifies ambidextrous form
Separate units with aligned
architectures and targeted
Senior team that explicitly
Ambidextrous Leadership
owns the ambidextrous
Proposition 1
Proposition 2
Proposition 3
Proposition 4
Proposition 5
Performance
communication)
allocation)
Overall
cultures
tactical)
Turner Yes Yes No to Yes No to Yes No to Yes Declining to
Technologies improving
IBM Network Yes No to Yes Yes No to Yes No to Yes Declining to
Technologies Improving
possibly helpful, a clear strategic intent may not be a necessary condition for
executing ambidextrous designs.
The second proposition suggested the importance of a common vision and
values as necessary to promote a common identity across explore and exploit
units. Here the evidence is largely consistent with proposition two. Six of the
eight consistently high-performing firms had a clear over-arching vision and
common values. In contrast, two of the three poor performing firms did not
have such clarity. Printing Company (pseudonym) had a senior team that both
articulated a clear strategic intent as well as an overarching vision and identity.
This senior team could not, however, execute against this clear strategy and
overarching identity. Moreover, three of the four firms that learned how to be
ambidextrous had or developed a well-defined vision. For example, at USA
Today there was an explicit strategy to “be a network, not a newspaper.” The
over-arching aspiration was to be “the local paper for the global village.” This
strategy and vision, and a common set of values around fairness, accuracy, and
trust, helped knit together a highly differentiated organization. Of the twelve
firms able to execute ambidextrous designs, only HP Scanner and Misys were
able to implement the ambidextrous design without an overarching identity.
Thus, while not definitive, the evidence suggests that a common vision is an
important discriminator of more- versus less-successful ambidextrous designs,
but not necessarily a sufficient one.
The third proposition argued for the importance of a consensus in the
senior team about the ambidextrous strategy and a common-fate reward sys-
tem within the team to promote this. Our data supports this proposition. In
each of the three instances of failure, there was a lack of consensus within the
senior team about the relative importance of ambidexterity and there was no
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 15
13. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
c
ommon-fate reward system for the senior team. Interviews suggested that the
existing reward systems that were based on sub-unit or functional performance
were a major cause of the inability of the organization to leverage common
assets. In the case of SAP, these disputes played out in the unwillingness of the
sales force to promote lower-margin new products and disputes among senior
managers about revenue recognition. In the printing company case, short-term
financial pressures and the lack of any common-fate reward for the senior team
resulted in a focus on achieving short-term revenue targets through the older
but higher-margin products. Similarly, at Defense Corp, White’s Homeland
Security initiative was initially opposed by other members of the senior team
because of its inability to generate short-term revenue. The uncertainty of a long
sales-cycle associated with a new government customer was overwhelmed by
the short-term metrics of revenue and gross margin. The senior team’s systems
for evaluating performance lacked the capacity to evaluate a business at a more
immature phase of development.
In contrast, in the most-successful ambidextrous efforts, the senior team
was heavily incented to promote both explore and exploit businesses. In the
Cisco TelePresence case, members of the governance team (Boards and Councils)
had a significant portion of their bonus contingent on the success of both units.
In the successful DaVita Rx case, there were initial disputes within the senior
team about metrics and margins that were only resolved after a common-fate
reward system was installed. At Misys, senior team resistance was overcome
only after Lawrie replaced the opposing managers. Importantly, in three of the
four cases where the firms learned how to be ambidextrous, there was a shift
from a lack of consensus ownership about the importance of the exploratory
effort to a fully committed senior team. This shift in top team ownership of the
ambidextrous strategy involved the creation of common-fate incentive systems,
a shift in leadership behaviors of the senior manager, and, in several cases, turn-
over within the senior team.
The fourth condition proposed as necessary for successful ambidexterity
was the presence of separate aligned architectures for the explore and exploit
units coupled with targeted integration to ensure that common resources were
leveraged across units. In all three instances of failure, these distinct alignments
were conspicuously missing. In the case of SAP, responsibility for the exploratory
venture (software-as-a-service) was split between two functional heads with
the result that effective coordination never occurred and decisions were made
slowly. At Software Company (pseudonym), a separate exploratory unit was
established on paper but never staffed. In each of these ambidextrous failures,
the locus of integration between the needs of the exploratory and exploitative
activities was either too low in the firm or was ambiguous.
In contrast, in each successful case there were always separate explore
and exploit units with senior-level integration to ensure that resources were
allocated. At IBM this was done either through their EBO process (e.g., in Life
Sciences)25 or, in the Middleware case, through the establishment of distinct
units focused on different time horizons; that is, mature, growth, and merging
e
16
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
14. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
products. At Cisco this was done through a Boards and Councils process where
there was a clear allocation of responsibilities, resources, and structures. In
all successful cases, the exploratory units were initially physically separated
from the exploit parts of the business. Similarly, for three of the four firms that
learned how to be ambidextrous, there was a switch in organization design from
an integrated approach (e.g., project teams) to the establishment of separate
units for explore and explore businesses.
The final core mechanism proposed as important for successful ambi-
dexterity was the ability of the ambidextrous leader to resolve the inevitable
conflicts and resource allocation decisions that this organization design entails.
This too is an important discriminator between more- versus less-successful
ambidextrous designs. In each failure case this capability was lacking. At SAP
there were continual disputes about resources and responsibilities across the par-
ticipating functions without a clear mechanism or clear leadership for resolution.
In the printing firm, although there was a separate explore unit with a respon-
sible manager, he reported to an exploit manager who was held responsible for
margins and short-term revenues. The exploratory unit manager was not rep-
resented on the senior team with the result that his voice was not heard when
critical resource decisions were made.
In contrast, in each successful case, there was a clear, identifiable leader
and forum to resolve conflicts and make definitive resource allocation decisions.
For example, at Zensar, even though there were substantial conflicts between
the existing business units and the new integrative software platform, the CEO
saw to it that his team actually dealt with these conflicts and made the appropri-
ate resource allocation shifts between the existing units. At Misys, Mike Lawrie
ensured that resources needed for the new open source effort were allocated
in a timely manner. Similarly, in each of the four units that learned how to be
ambidextrous, the general manager changed the senior team composition and
processes to resolve conflicts associated with exploration and exploitation. For
instance, at USA Today, only after Curley replaced several members of his team
was his firm able to excel at both print and web-based content delivery. Simi-
larly, only after the division general manager changed her leadership style at
IBM’s Network Technology Division was her team able to balance resource allo-
cation and decision making between her explore and exploit business lines.
The Management of Ambidexterity
One of the key features of ambidexterity is the ability of the organization
to reallocate assets and capabilities to address new threats and opportunities.
Practically speaking, this means that leaders within the organization are able to
make the difficult choices required to reconfigure assets to promote exploratory
ventures. The results from these fifteen case studies suggest that there are iden-
tifiable core mechanisms that discriminate between more- versus less-successful
ambidextrous designs in action. The most-successful ambidextrous designs had
leaders who developed a clear vision and common identity (Proposition 2),
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 17
15. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
built senior teams that were committed to the ambidextrous strategy and were
incented to both explore and exploit (Proposition 3), employed distinct and
aligned subunits to focus on either exploration or exploitation (Proposition 4),
and built teams that could deal with the resource allocations and conflicts asso-
ciated with exploration and exploitation (Proposition 5). Those less-successful
attempts at ambidexterity did not employ these core mechanisms. Although
useful, the articulation of a clear strategic intent (Proposition 1) and, to a lesser
extent, the provision of an overarching vision (Proposition 2) did not discrimi-
nate between the more- versus less-successful attempts to build an ambidextrous
organization. This suggests that articulating why ambidexterity is important is
not the same as how it is implemented.
In the implementation of an ambidextrous design, execution appears
to trump strategy. The first two propositions (articulating a strategy and over-
arching vision for the ambidextrous form) are the easy part for senior managers.
The next three propositions are about strategic execution. These require hard
choices about resource allocation, leader behavior, senior team composition (or
replacement), and the balancing of contradictory organizational architectures.
The most-successful ambidextrous designs had more of these components from
the beginning. In contrast, those firms that learned how to be ambidextrous
struggled with at least two of these core components and only after resolving
these were they to effectively implement an ambidextrous design.
These results suggest that effective ambidextrous designs are based on
a set of interrelated choices made by the leader. Any subset of the core mecha-
nisms is associated with underperformance. As such, executing ambidextrous
designs can be seen as a complex senior leadership task that requires an inte-
grated set of strategic, structural, incentive, and top team process decisions.
Clearly, successful ambidextrous designs require more than the simple organiza-
tional structural decision in which the exploratory and exploitative subunits are
separated. The critical elements, and perhaps the more difficult elements, are the
processes by which these units are integrated in a value enhancing way.
Discussion
These results are largely consistent with Teece’s observation that
“dynamic capabilities reside in large measure with the enterprise’s top manage-
ment team.”26 Concretely, it appears that ambidexterity as a dynamic capability
rests on the ability of leaders not only to articulate a strategic intent and vision
that justifies exploration and exploitation, but—more importantly—to manage
the inherent tensions associated with incompatible organizational architectures.
These results also extend previous research that has linked transformational
leadership to successful ambidexterity by explicating some of the core processes
that underpin the transformational leadership construct.27 These mechanisms
are largely consistent with earlier research. For example, our findings that senior
team consensus is an important ingredient in the implementation of ambidexter-
ity is consistent with previous research showing that the behavioral ntegration
i
18
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
16. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
of the senior team is a precursor to successful ambidexterity.28 Similarly, the
importance of targeted integration and clear incentives documented here has
also been suggested in previous studies.29 The critical aspect of resource alloca-
tion illustrated here has also been seen in previous studies, especially in research
showing that failed efforts at renewal stem not from a lack of technology or
resources but the inability of senior managers to allocate those resources effec-
tively to the exploratory effort.30 Finally, while each component characteristic
of ambidextrous designs is important, it appears that it is the set of components
interacting together that define the dynamic capabilities that drive effective
ambidextrous designs.31
These patterns suggest concrete yet integrated sets of actions that leaders
can take to execute strategies that encompass both exploration and exploitation.
At Misys, Mike Lawrie articulated his strategic intent for open source software
solutions at a senior team offsite. He kept Misys Open Source as a separate unit
reporting to his office. He also emphasized the need for cost and quality progress
in his existing business units even as he encouraged disciplined experimentation
in the open source unit. As a leader, Lawrie was able to tolerate the competition
between Misys Open Source and other platforms and was willing to risk short-
term revenue to help create longer-term options with a potentially disruptive
technology. He has seen his strategy pay dividends. The healthcare business unit
revenues grew more than 30% in 2009 with Misys Open Source as the basis for
important new contracts with hospitals, physicians, and insurers. At the same
time, Open Source has triggered innovation into other Misys units—a new
banking product has large open source components, and the Misys website is
completely open source.
To realize the potential of SBP at Zensar, Ganesh Natarajan made the
decision to keep SBP separate from the other units. He clarified his strategic and
emotional rationale for exploration and exploitation with his senior team and,
for the next two years, relentlessly emphasized both exploration and exploita-
tion. By 2008, SBP had almost doubled its number of clients as well as profits.
Having demonstrated its success technically and in the market, SBP was then
reintegrated within the main business in 2008. Finally, at Defense Corp, Caro-
line White received approval to separate her homeland security exploration unit
and built a new management system and metrics for gauging progress of this
business. She also changed the incentives of her top team so that they were all
accountable for both short-term results as well as longer-term results. By 2010,
the exploratory unit proved its value, winning a $13M contract with the Trans-
port Security Agency for improving perimeter security at U.S. airports.
Conclusion
There is now convincing evidence suggesting that for organizations to
survive in the face of change, they need to be able to successfully exploit their
existing businesses and to explore into new spaces by reconfiguring existing
resources and developing new capabilities.32 While the evidence for the enefits
b
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 19
17. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
of ambidexterity is accumulating, there exists a gap in understanding how ambi-
dexterity is actually managed within organizations. This article has explored
how leaders within organizations actually implement ambidexterity. The actions,
behaviors, and design choices made by the senior leader comprise the dynamic
capabilities that enable firms to simultaneously explore and exploit and empha-
size the key role of strategic leadership in adapting, integrating, and reconfigur-
ing organizational skills and resources to match changing environments.
Notes
1. Charles I. Stubbart and Michael B. Knight, “The Case of the Disappearing Firms: Empirical
Evidence and Implications,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27/1 (February 2006): 79-100.
2. Ibid., p. 96.
3. Rajshree Agarwal and Michael Gort, “The Evolution of Markets and Entry, Exit, and Sur-
vival of Firms,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78/3 (August 1996): 489-498.
4. Paul Ormerod, Why Most Things Fail (New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 2005), p. 18.
5. Leslie Hannah, “Marshall’s Trees and the Global Forest: Were Giant Redwoods Different?”
Center for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper #318, 1997.
6. See James G. March, “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning,” Organiza-
tion Science, 2/1 (February 1991): 71–87; James G. March, “The Evolution of Evolution,”
in J. Baum and J. Singh, eds., Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations (New York, NY: Oxford
University Press, 1994), pp. 39-52.
7. For interesting examples of how biological evolution might apply to organizations, see Tim
Harford, Adapt: Why Success Always Starts With Failure (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and
Giroux, 2011); Martin A. Nowak and Roger Highfield, Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution
and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed (New York, NY: Free Press, 2011); Charles A. O’Reilly,
J. Bruce Harreld, and Michael L. Tushman, “Organizational Ambidexterity: IBM and Emerg-
ing Business Opportunities,” California Management Review, 51/4 (Summer 2009): 75-99;
Ormerod, op. cit.
8. Hannah, op. cit., p. 19.
9. See, for example, Ze-Lin He and Poh-Kam Wong, “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empiri-
cal Test of Ambidexterity,” Organization Science, 15/4 (July/August 2004): 481-494; Sebastian
Raisch, Julian Birkinshaw, Gilbert Probst, and Michael L. Tushman, “Organizational Ambi-
dexterity: Balancing Exploitation and Exploration for Sustained Performance,” Organization
Science, 20/4 (July/August 2009): 685-695; Michael L. Tushman and Charles A. O’Reilly,
“The Ambidextrous Organization: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change,”
California Management Review, 38/4 (Summer 1996): 8-30.
10. For a review of the growing literature on dynamic capabilities, see V. Ambrosini and C.
Bowman, “What Are Dynamic Capabilities and Are They a Useful Construct in Strategic
Management?” International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1 (March 2009): 29-49; Kath-
leen M. Eisenhardt and Jeffrey A. Martin, “Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?” Strategic
Management Journal, 21/10-11 (October/November 2000): 1105–1121; J. Bruce Harreld,
Charles A. O’Reilly, and Michael L. Tushman, “Dynamic Capabilities at IBM: Driving Strat-
egy into Action,” California Management Review, 49/4 (Summer 2007): 21-43; Constance E.
Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margaret A. Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David J. Teece,
and Sidney G. Winter, Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations
(Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2007); David J. Teece, Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen,
“Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management,” Strategic Management Journal, 18/7
(August 1997): 509-533.
11. C. O’Reilly and M. Tushman, “Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Inno-
vator’s Dilemma,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 28 (2008): 190.
12. Harreld et al. (2007), op. cit.; David J. Teece, “Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature
and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance,” Strategic Management Jour-
nal, 28 (December 2007): 1319-1350.
13. See, for example, Vijay Govindarajan and Chris Trimble, “Building Breakthrough Businesses
within Established Organizations,” Harvard Business Review, 83/5 (May 2005): 58-68; Justin
P. Jansen, Frans A. Tempelaar, Frans A. Van den Bosch, and Henk W. Volberda, “Structural
20
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu
18. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
Differentiation and Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Integration Mechanisms,” Orga-
nization Science, 20/4 (July/August 2009): 797-811; Michael H. Lubatkin, Zeki Simsek, Yan
Ling, and John F. Veiga, “Ambidexterity and Performance in Small- to Medium-Sized Firms:
The Pivotal Role of TMT Behavioral Integration,” Journal of Management, 32/5 (2006): 646-
672; Tom J. Mom, Frans A. Van den Bosch, and Henk W. Volberda, “Understanding Varia-
tion in Managers’ Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal
Structural and Personal Coordination Mechanisms,” Organization Science, 20/4 (July/August
2009): 812-828; Sebastian Raisch and Julian Birkinshaw, “Organizational Ambidexter-
ity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators,” Journal of Management, 34/3 (June 2008):
375-409; Michael L. Tushman, Wendy K. Smith, Robert C. Wood, George Westerman, and
Charles A. O’Reilly, “Organizational Designs and Innovation Streams,” Industrial and Corpo-
rate Change, 19/5 (October 2010): 1331-1366.
14. O’Reilly and Tushman (2008), op cit.
15. Clay M. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
(Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997); Erwin Danneels, “The Dynamics of
Product Innovation and Firm Competences,” Strategic Management Journal, 23/12 (December
2002): 1095-1121; March (1991), op. cit.; Mary Tripsas and Giovanni Gavetti, “Capabilities,
Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging,” Strategic Management Journal, 21/10-
11 (October/November 2000): 1147-1161.
16. Max Bazerman and Michael Watkins, Predictable Surprises (Boston, MA: Harvard Business
School Press, 2004); Mary J. Benner and Michael L. Tushman, “Exploitation, Exploration
and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited,” Academy of Management
Review, 28/2 (April 2003): 238-256; March (1991), op. cit.
17. Justin J. Jansen, Dusya Vera, and Mary Crossan, “Strategic Leadership for Exploration and
Exploitation: The Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism,” Leadership Quarterly, 20/1
(February 2009): 5-18; R. Scott Livengood and Rhonda K. Reger, “That’s Our Turf! Identity
Domains and Competitive Dynamics,” Academy of Management Review, 35/1 (January 2010):
48-66; Louise A. Nemanich and Dusya Vera, “Transformational Leadership and Ambidexter-
ity in the Context of an Acquisition,” Leadership Quarterly, 20/1 (February 2009): 19-33.
18. Lubatkin, Simsek, Ling, and Veiga, op. cit.; Jatinder Sidhu, Henk Volberda, and Harry Com-
mandeur, “Exploring Exploration Orientation and Its Determinants: Some Empirical Evi-
dence,” Journal of Management Studies, 41/6 (September 2004): 913-932.
19. Christine M. Beckman, “The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm
Behavior,” Academy of Management Journal, 49/4 (August 2006): 741-758; J. Jansen,
G. George, F. Van den Bosch, and H. Volberda, “Senior Team Attributes and Organizational
Ambidexterity: The Moderating Role of Transformational Leadership,” Journal of Management
Studies, 45/5 (July 2008): 982-1007.
20. Charles A. O’Reilly and Michael L. Tushman, “The Ambidextrous Organization,” Harvard
Business Review, 82/4 (April 2004): 74-83; Nicolaj Siggelkow and Daniel Levinthal, “Tem-
porarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational
Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation,” Organization Science, 14/6 (November/December
2003): 650-669.
21. Clark Gilbert, “Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource versus Routine Rigidity,” Acad-
emy of Management Journal, 48/5 (October 2005): 741-763; Mom, Van den Bosch, and Vol-
berda, op. cit.; Charles A. O’Reilly, David F. Caldwell, Jennifer A. Chatman, Margaret Lapiz,
and William Self, “How Leadership Matters: The Effects of Leaders’ Alignment on Strategy
Implementation,” Leadership Quarterly, 21/1 (February 2010): 104-113; Wendy K. Smith and
Michael L. Tushman, “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for
Managing Innovation Streams,” Organization Science, 16/5 (September/October 2005):
522-536.
22. V.J. Gilchrest, “Key Informant Interviews,” in B.F. Crabtree and W.L. Miller, eds., Doing
Qualitative Research (London: Sage, 1992).
23. This research used a multi-case design in which cases were written for each of the fifteen
ambidexterity efforts (e.g., Eisenhardt, 1989). These cases were then used to generate
insights into those actions that were more or less likely to be associated with the successful
implementation of an ambidextrous form. Each of the 15 cases was compared to the five
propositions suggested by O’Reilly and Tushman (2008). Given the exploratory and qualita-
tive nature of this investigation and the nature of our convenience sample, any results are
necessarily tentative.
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu 21
19. Organizational Ambidexterity in Action: How Managers Explore and Exploit
24. Govindarajan and Trimble, op. cit.; Charles H. House and Raymond L. Price, The HP Phenom-
enon: Innovation and Business Transformation (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009);
Richard S. Rosenbloom, “Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change: The Trans-
formation of NCR in the Electronic Era,” Strategic Management Journal, 21/10-11 (October/
November 2000): 1083-1103.
25. O’Reilly, Harreld, and Tushman, (2009) op cit.
26. Teece (2007), op cit., p. 146.
27. Jansen, George, Van den Bosch, and Volberda, op. cit.; Jansen, Vera, and Crossan, op. cit.;
Nemanich and Vera, op. cit.; Smith and Tushman, op. cit.
28. For example, see Beckman (2006), op. cit.; Lubatkin, Simsek, Ling, and Veiga, op. cit.;
Alva Taylor and Constance E. Helfat, “Organizational Linkages for Surviving Technological
Change: Complementary Assets, Middle Management, and Ambidexterity,” Organization Sci-
ence, 20/4 (July/August 2009): 718-739.
29. See Jansen, Tempelaar, Van den Bosch, and Volberda, op. cit.; O’Reilly and Tushman (2004),
op. cit.; Wendy K. Smith, “Managing Strategic Ambidexterity: Top Management Teams
and Cognitive Processes to Explore and Exploit Simultaneously,” paper presented at the
25th EGOS Colloquium, Barcelona, July 3, 2009; Tushman, Smith, Wood, Westerman, and
O’Reilly, op. cit.
30. For example, see Gilbert, op. cit.; Robert Sobel, When Giants Stumble: Classic Business Blunders
and How to Avoid Them (Paramus, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999); Donald N. Sull, “The Dynamics of
Standing Still: Firestone Tire and Rubber and the Radial Revolution,” Business History Review,
73/3 (Autumn 1999): 430-464; Tripsas and Gavetti, op. cit.
31. Harreld, O’Reilly, and Tushman (2007), op. cit.; Jan Rivkin and Nicolaj Siggelkow, “Bal
ancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies among Elements of Organizational Design,”
Management Science, 49/3 (March 2003): 290-311; Richard Wittington, Andrew Pettigrew,
Simon Peck, Evelyn Penton, and Martin Conyon, “Change and Complementarities in
the New Competitive Landscape,” Organization Science, 10/5 (September/October 1999):
583-600.
32. Matthew S. Olson and Derek Van Bever, Stall Points (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,
2008); Raisch and Birkinshaw (2008), op. cit.; Juha Uotila, Markku Maula, and Thomas
Keil, and Shaker A. Zhara, “Exploration, Exploitation and Financial Performance: Analysis
of S&P 500 Corporations,” Strategic Management Journal, 30/2 (February 2009): 221-231.
22
university of california, berkeley VOL. 53, NO. 4 summer 2011 cmR.berkeley.edu