The presentation seeks to provide deep insight into the Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process introduced to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by way of enactment of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 under Part II Chapter III-A of the Code.
The presentation seeks to provide deep insight into the Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process introduced to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 by way of enactment of Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021 under Part II Chapter III-A of the Code.
Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996Legal
Section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, jurisdiction, powers, court, local, international, judgments, supreme court, high court, powers, interim, time limit, amendment 2015
Domicile of choice is the one an individual can acquire by his own choice. And to acquire such domicile proof of abandoning his origin domicile, mental intention to reside for a long term & habitual residence & physical presence etc. are inevitable.
Food truck business or a restaurant on wheels has been gaining popularity as a concept in India, among entrepreneurs and consumers alike. In this article, we will take you through everything you need to know about starting a food truck in India.
Let’s start with these things:
Costs involved
Licenses needed
Benefits you can get
Points to keep in mind
Food truck marketing
Domicile of choice is the one acquired by a person by his own choice. But it requires the elements like - habitual residence, intention to reside for long duration, and interest not to abandon it.
Cloud Kitchen Business Models: Cloud Kitchen HubAbhinav Saxena
Here are Cloud Kitchen Business Models you must know as a business owner. Dr. Abhinav Saxena is here to guide, if you have any queries regarding the cloud kitchen business models.
Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996Legal
Section 9 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996, jurisdiction, powers, court, local, international, judgments, supreme court, high court, powers, interim, time limit, amendment 2015
Domicile of choice is the one an individual can acquire by his own choice. And to acquire such domicile proof of abandoning his origin domicile, mental intention to reside for a long term & habitual residence & physical presence etc. are inevitable.
Food truck business or a restaurant on wheels has been gaining popularity as a concept in India, among entrepreneurs and consumers alike. In this article, we will take you through everything you need to know about starting a food truck in India.
Let’s start with these things:
Costs involved
Licenses needed
Benefits you can get
Points to keep in mind
Food truck marketing
Domicile of choice is the one acquired by a person by his own choice. But it requires the elements like - habitual residence, intention to reside for long duration, and interest not to abandon it.
Cloud Kitchen Business Models: Cloud Kitchen HubAbhinav Saxena
Here are Cloud Kitchen Business Models you must know as a business owner. Dr. Abhinav Saxena is here to guide, if you have any queries regarding the cloud kitchen business models.
Today, with us we have “Mr. Ashok Juneja” who is an Advocate and Insolvency Professional. He is Founder & Managing Partner of a multi disciplinary Law Firm “MANTRAH LAW HOUSE LLP” which is an LLP of renowned Mantrah Group)
He is also director of “MANTRAH INSOLVENCY PROFESSIONALS PVT LTD”
Mr. Juneja, aged about 63 years, is a Law Graduate, Company Secretary, Cost Accountant, M.Com. Mr. Juneja also holds Diploma in Business Finance (DBF), NSE Certification in Financial Market (NCFM) and Advance Diploma in Computer Application (ADICA) etc.
Mr Juneja, a graduate from one of the most prestigious college “Shri Ram College of Commerce” has an overall combined experience of more than 40 years in Corporate Laws including Appearances in Supreme Court, High Courts, National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), DRT etc.
Mr Juneja empanelled with State Bank of India and Andhra Bank as an Insolvency Professional has already handled assignments of Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Resolution Professional (RP) and Voluntary Liquidator.
He is also member of Bar Council of Delhi, Executive Member of NCLT & NCLAT Bar Association, Bar Association of Supreme Court, Delhi High Court, Institute of Company Secretaries of India, Institute of Cost Accountant of India, CII, PHD Chamber of Commerce & Industry and ASSOCHAM.
He is also the Director on the board and Adviser to many Companies which include Public Listed Companies.
ELP Arbitration Update – Ravi Ranjan Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Aditya Kumar Cha...Economic Laws Practice
The Supreme Court determined whether Kolkata would be the ‘seat’ of arbitration when the arbitration clause provided that “…the sitting of the said Arbitral Tribunal shall be at Kolkata” and admittedly, no part of the cause of action arose at Kolkata.
Lawweb.in whether arbitral tribunal can enforce its own order by appointing a...Law Web
Whether arbitral Tribunal can enforce its own order by appointing Advocate Commissioner/Receiver? - See more at: http://www.lawweb.in/2016/04/whether-arbitral-tribunal-can-enforce.html?#sthash.gzn3oCTQ.dpuf
White Paper on National Company Law Tribunal and National Company Law Appella...Ricky Chopra
Ricky Chopra International Counsels is a full service international law firm based in gurgaon
read more at https://rickychopra.co/
read about our services for General Corporate & Business Laws
at https://rickychopra.co/services/gen-corporate-and-business-laws/
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has no power to stay prosecution of taxpayers i...D Murali ☆
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has no power to stay prosecution of taxpayers in respect of matters in appeal before it - T. N. Pandey - Article published in Business Advisor, dated November 10, 2016 - http://www.magzter.com/IN/Shrinikethan/Business-Advisor/Business/
Similar to Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd v. Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd (20)
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
RIGHTS OF VICTIM EDITED PRESENTATION(SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Victims of crime have a range of rights designed to ensure their protection, support, and participation in the justice system. These rights include the right to be treated with dignity and respect, the right to be informed about the progress of their case, and the right to be heard during legal proceedings. Victims are entitled to protection from intimidation and harm, access to support services such as counseling and medical care, and the right to restitution from the offender. Additionally, many jurisdictions provide victims with the right to participate in parole hearings and the right to privacy to protect their personal information from public disclosure. These rights aim to acknowledge the impact of crime on victims and to provide them with the necessary resources and involvement in the judicial process.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptxanvithaav
These slides helps the student of international law to understand what is the nature of international law? and how international law was originated and developed?.
The slides was well structured along with the highlighted points for better understanding .
NATURE, ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.pptx
Arcelor Mittal Nippon Steel India Ltd v. Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd
1. ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Ltd v. Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd
Maintaining the balance of power by allowing interim relief cases to be heard by the court
following the establishment of an arbitral tribunal
Indian courts have developed a
pro-arbitration posture in recent years,
emphasising the importance of minimal
judicial involvement in arbitral proceedings
or decisions. The Supreme Court of India
recently clarified the scope of the courts'
power to "entertain" and adjudicate
applications for interim relief when the
arbitral tribunal has been constituted during
the pendency of parties' applications for
interim relief before the court in
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Ltd v
Essar Bulk Terminal Ltd.
The Supreme Court ruled that once an
arbitral tribunal has been established, the
court cannot entertain, consider, or decide
on an application for interim relief under
Section 9 of the (Indian) Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act), unless the
remedy under Section 17 of the Act has been
rendered ineffective. In certain
circumstances, the court may adjudicate the
Section 9 application if the date of the
Section 9 application before the court
precedes the formation of the arbitral
tribunal. The following article gives a short
overview of the Supreme Court's decision.
Background 一
ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India Limited
(Appellant) and Essar Bulk Terminal
Limited (Respondent) engaged into a cargo
handling arrangement at Hazira Port
(Agreement). All issues arising out of the
Agreement were to be resolved in line with
the Act's requirements, according to Article
15 of the Agreement. Following that, some
disagreements occurred between the parties,
prompting the parties to activate the
arbitration clause in the Agreement.
Meanwhile, on 15 January 2021 and 16
March 2021, Arcelor and Essar sought
interim relief from the Commercial Court in
Surat, Gujarat, under Section 9 of the Act
(Interim Relief Applications). The Interim
Relief Applications were heard by the
Commercial Court, which adjourned the
case until June 7, 2021. (Order).
While the decision was pending, the Gujarat
High Court established a three-member
arbitral panel to address the parties'
differences. Arcelor then filed an interim
application, requesting that the parties'
Interim Relief Applications be sent to the
newly formed arbitral panel. The
01 | October 2021 | Kashyap Partners & Associates LLP
2. Commercial Court, however, rejected the
stated interim application in a decision dated
July 16, 2021. Arcelor filed a lawsuit in
Gujarat's High Court challenging this. The
High Court, on the other hand, dismissed the
appeal, holding that the Commercial Court
has the authority to examine whether the
remedy under Section 17 of the Act is
ineffective and to make appropriate
directions under Section 9 of the Act.
Arcelor appealed the High Court's decision
to the Supreme Court, which was resolved in
the current case under debate.
Issues 一
The Supreme Court has posed two issues:
1. If so, what is the real meaning and
intent of the word "entertain" in
Section 9(3) of the Act?
2. Whether, once an arbitral tribunal
has been established, the court must
evaluate the efficacy of the remedy
under Section 17 before making an
order under Section 9(1) of the Act?
Because the Supreme Court's ruling
interprets Section 9(3) of the Act, it is
reprinted here for your convenience:
“(3) The Court must not hear an application
under sub-section (1) once the arbitral
tribunal has been established, unless the
Court determines that circumstances exist
that render the remedy afforded under
section 17 ineffective.”
Arguments 一
Due to Section 9(3) of the Act, Arcelor
contended that after the arbitral panel has
been established, the Commercial Court
cannot continue to hear the Interim Relief
Applications. Section 9(3) is a negative
Kompetenz-Kompetenz provision that limits
the court's involvement once the arbitral
tribunal has been established. It was claimed
that the phrase "entertain" as used in Section
9(3) of the Act meant not just admitting for
consideration, but also the whole
adjudication procedure until a decision on
the merits was reached. As a result, Arcelor
contended that, even if the Order was
reserved, the Commercial Court's actions
were inconsistent with Section 9(3) of the
Act, because the Commercial Court was
hearing the Interim Relief Applications
while the arbitral tribunal was still in
operation.
Section 9(3) of the Act would not be used,
according to Essar, because the Interim
Relief Applications were fully heard on the
merits, entertained, and reserved for
decisions on June 7, 2021, prior to the
formation of the Arbitral Tribunal on July 9,
2021. According to Essar, the phrase
"entertain" means "take into account" or
02 | October 2021 | Kashyap Partners & Associates LLP
3. "take into consideration in order to deal
with." It was further contended that Section
9(3) of the Act was neither non-obstante nor
an ouster provision, rendering the courts
coram non judice as soon as the Arbitral
Tribunal was established.
Finally, Essar claimed that the parties had
spent a significant amount of court time,
money, and energy agitating the Interim
Relief Applications, and that relegating the
Interim Relief Applications to the arbitral
tribunal would defeat the purpose of
arbitration.
The Apex Court 一
In response to Issue I the Supreme Court
concluded that the term "entertain" in
Section 9(3) of the Act implies "to examine"
the problems posed by applying one's
intellect. When a case is taken up for
consideration by the court, it is referred to as
a "encounter." The deliberation process
might continue until a decision is reached.
Thus, under Section 9(3), after the arbitral
tribunal has been established and has
custody of the parties' dispute, the court
cannot hear an application under Section 9
of the Act unless the remedy under Section
17 is ineffective.
In this instance, however, the Supreme
Court agreed with Essar that the object of
Section 9(3) cannot be to turn back the clock
and force an arbitral tribunal to reconsider a
subject that has already been reserved for
orders under Section 17 of the Act. As a
result, the Supreme Court emphasised that
the bar of Section 9(3) of the Act would not
apply once an interim relief application had
been received and considered, as in the
current instance, where the hearing had been
completed and judgement had been
reserved.
Concerning Issue (ii), the Supreme Court
concluded that where an application has
already been brought up for consideration
and is in the process of being examined or
has already been considered, the question of
whether or not the remedy under Section 17
is effective does not arise. Only when the
application is being entertained and/or taken
up for consideration by the arbitral tribunal
is it necessary to undertake the exercise.
In the current instance, the Supreme Court
concluded that because the Commercial
Court had already heard and reviewed the
application under Section 9 of the Act, it
was unnecessary for the Commercial Court
to assess the efficacy of relief under Section
17 of the Act.
Conclusion 一
Finally, the Supreme Court has confirmed
that an arbitral tribunal can be given partial
and limited priority over courts where the
03 | October 2021 | Kashyap Partners & Associates LLP
4. legislation permits it. With this judgement,
the Apex Court has delicately balanced the
arbitral procedure in the hands of both
courts and arbitral tribunals.
Section 9(1) establishes distinct phases at
which parties may seek interim relief from
the court. This can happen:
(a) before the start of arbitral proceedings,
(b) during arbitral proceedings, or
(c) at any point after an arbitral award is
made but before it is enforced under Section
36 of the Act.
If the interim relief application has already
been considered, that is, if an order has been
reserved or a judgement has been issued, it
means that a significant amount of time and
resources have been invested in it. As a
result, sending the matter back to the arbitral
tribunal for a new hearing would be
impossible. However, if the interim relief
application has been submitted but has yet to
be reviewed by the court, and an arbitral
tribunal has been established in the
meanwhile, the courts shall not take up the
interim relief case because of the bar
imposed by Section 9 (3) of the Act.
Regardless, the Supreme Court concluded
that even if an application under Section 9
had been entertained before the creation of
the tribunal, the court maintains authority to
instruct the parties to approach the arbitral
tribunal. If required, while making such
reference, it may grant a limited order of
interim protection, particularly when there
has been a considerable interval between the
hearings such that a party’s application
needs to virtually be considered afresh, or
the hearing has just begun and is expected to
take a lot of time
Disclaimer: This document is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. You should
not act or rely on any information in this document without first seeking legal advice. This
material is intended for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
04 | October 2021 | Kashyap Partners & Associates LLP