Applying Business
Intelligence (‘BI’) In
Demand Generation
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Who is ANNUITAS?
•  Founded in 2005
•  Headquartered in Atlanta, GA
•  B2B Demand Process Transformation firm
–  Demand generation change management
–  Buying-process alignment
–  Lead-to-revenue process context
–  NPV / ROI / CLV focus
•  Serving global, growth-oriented, $1B+ enterprise organizations
–  Financial services
–  Industrial
–  Technology
ANNUITAS Enterprise Demand Generation Study
Download at www.annuitas.com
Source:	
  	
  ANNUITAS,	
  “2014	
  B2B	
  Enterprise	
  Demand	
  Genera<on	
  Survey,”	
  November	
  2014.	
  
What Is Obvious: We’re In a
‘2.0’ B2B Demand Generation
Environment
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Marketing Now (Should) Own a Majority of
the Buying Process
“[T]he	
  average	
  [B2B]	
  
customer	
  had	
  completed	
  
more	
  than	
  one-­‐half	
  of	
  the	
  
purchase	
  decision-­‐making	
  
process	
  prior	
  to	
  engaging	
  
a	
  supplier	
  sales	
  rep	
  
directly	
  …	
  .	
  At	
  the	
  upper	
  
limit,	
  that	
  number	
  ran	
  as	
  
high	
  as	
  70%	
  …	
  .”	
  
Source:	
  	
  The	
  Corporate	
  Execu<ve	
  Board	
  Company,	
  “The	
  Digital	
  Evolu<on	
  in	
  B2B	
  Marke<ng,”	
  2012.	
  
Enterprise Demand Generation Environment
Marketing’s Top Goal Is Delivering ‘Quality Leads’
Through Demand Generation
Source:	
  	
  ANNUITAS,	
  “2014	
  B2B	
  Enterprise	
  Demand	
  Genera<on	
  Survey,”	
  November	
  2014.	
  
CMOs Believe They Must Now Deliver ROI
"Most	
  CMOs	
  are	
  struggling	
  in	
  one	
  
vital	
  respect	
  —	
  return	
  on	
  
investment	
  (ROI).	
  …	
  Nearly	
  two-­‐
thirds	
  of	
  CMOs	
  think	
  return	
  on	
  
markeIng	
  investment	
  will	
  be	
  the	
  
primary	
  measure	
  of	
  their	
  
effecIveness	
  by	
  2015.	
  But	
  proving	
  
that	
  value	
  is	
  difficult.”	
  
Source:	
  	
  IBM,	
  “From	
  Stretched	
  to	
  Strengthened,”	
  2011.	
  
‘On Paper’ B2B Enterprises
Have Invested Heavily in
Demand Generation
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Enterprise Demand Generation Investments
B2B Enterprises Have Invested Heavily in Demand
Generation Staff Over the Last Five Years.
Source:	
  	
  ANNUITAS,	
  “2014	
  B2B	
  Enterprise	
  Demand	
  Genera<on	
  Survey,”	
  November	
  2014.	
  
Everyone Has a Content Marketing Plan
Source:	
  	
  Content	
  Marke<ng	
  Ins<tute	
  and	
  Marke<ngProfs,	
  "B2B	
  Content	
  Marke<ng	
  2015	
  Benchmarks,	
  Budgets,	
  and	
  Trends	
  -­‐-­‐	
  North	
  America."	
  
Enterprise Demand Generation Investments
B2B Enterprises Run a Large Number of Tactical,
Time-bound Demand Generation ‘Campaigns.’
Source:	
  	
  ANNUITAS,	
  “2014	
  B2B	
  Enterprise	
  Demand	
  Genera<on	
  Survey,”	
  November	
  2014.	
  
(Almost) Everyone Has Marketing
Automation
“In	
  a	
  recent	
  survey	
  of	
  business-­‐
to-­‐business	
  (B2B)	
  marketers,	
  
we	
  found	
  that	
  slightly	
  more	
  
than	
  50%	
  of	
  markeIng	
  
organizaIons	
  had	
  
implemented	
  a	
  system	
  to	
  
manage	
  the	
  lead-­‐to-­‐revenue	
  
process.”	
  
Source:	
  	
  Forrester,	
  "The	
  Forrester	
  WaveTM:	
  Lead-­‐To-­‐Revenue	
  Management	
  Pla_orm	
  Vendors,	
  Q1	
  2014,"	
  January	
  2014.	
  
Yet There Remains an
Enterprise Demand Generation
‘Disconnect’
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Enterprise Demand Generation Disconnect
B2B Enterprises Lack Process Discipline.
Source:	
  	
  ANNUITAS,	
  “2014	
  B2B	
  Enterprise	
  Demand	
  Genera<on	
  Survey,”	
  November	
  2014.	
  
Enterprise Demand Generation Disconnect
B2B Enterprise Demand Generation Today Fails to
Hit the Mark.
Source:	
  	
  ANNUITAS,	
  “2014	
  B2B	
  Enterprise	
  Demand	
  Genera<on	
  Survey,”	
  November	
  2014.	
  
How Do We Fix This Problem?
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Implementations of Technology
Systems and Data for Demand
Generation – By Themselves –
Are Not a ‘Solution’
‘Big Data’ Analytics / ‘BI’ – Alone –
Cannot Improve Demand Generation
Our Data and Systems in Demand
Generation Need Structure …
Otherwise ‘BI’ Is Useless …
#1: Build a Demand Process
Based on Buyer Journey and
Dialogue
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
The Key Is Getting People AND
Process AND Content AND
Technology to Work Together
It Is This ‘Integrative’ Approach
That Defines Successful Enterprise
‘Demand Process’
… Which BI Can Then Help Improve
What Is Demand Process?
The Key Elements of a Demand Process
Demand Process Architecture
Aligning People, Process, Content and Technology
Aligning Demand Process Elements with Buyer Journey
Demand Generation Program Design
Case Study: LENOX / Newell Rubbermaid
Approach: Buyer Dialogue Logic
Final Segmentation Approach
Content Offer Segmentation by Persona + Cutting Type
Supervisor*/*Experienced*Operator*
“On$the$Shop$Floor”$
Execu4ve*/*Plant*Manager*
“In$the$Office”$
General*Metal*Cu;ng*Industry!
Fabricators!
Metal*Service*Centers!
Machine*Shops!
Forges!
UPDATED 20 MAY 2013
Buyer	
  SegmentaIon	
   Buyer	
  Dialogue	
  Logic	
  
‘New’	
  (Organic	
  /	
  MarkeIng-­‐led)	
  	
  
Buying	
  Stages	
  
‘Old’	
  (TradiIonal	
  /	
  Sales-­‐led)	
  
Buying	
  Stages	
  
Case Study: LENOX / Newell Rubbermaid
Approach: Content Marketing Model
Content Marketing Model Overview
QUALIFIED)ENGAGED)ENGAGED) QUALIFIED)LEAD)
E,CO)1A:)))
"Top%Five%Opera-ng%
Challenges%in%the%%
[X%Segment]%of%the%
Metal%Cu=ng%
Industry")
E,CO)1B:)))
"Metal%Cu=ng%
Industry%Performance%
Benchmark%Study")
N,CO)2.1.0:)))
"Common%Traits%of%
High%Performing%
Metal%Cu=ng%
Opera-ons")
E,CO)1) N,CO)2)
N,CO)2.2.0:)))
"ROI%Analysis%of%
Making%
Improvements%to%Cost%
Per%Cut")
N,CO)2.2.1:)
"Managing%Blade%
Manufacturer%
Rela-onships%to%
Improve%Cu=ng%
Performance")
N,CO)3.0:)))
"LENOX%Customer%
Case%Study%KK%LENOX%
Band%Saw%Blade%
Difference"!
N,CO)3) N,CO)4)
N,CO)2.2.2:)))
"User%Error%or%Blade%
Failure:%How%to%
Know")
N,CO)3.1:)
"LENOX%Customer%
Service%Difference%for%
Band%Saw%Blades"%
N,CO)4.0:)
)"UpBlade%Challenge"%
Offer%
OR
HOT)LEAD)WARM)LEAD)
Note:%%Response%to%any%of%NKCO%2%content%offers%will%move%buyer%
forward%to%NKCO%3.%
Trigger)
Catalyst)
Root)Cause)Analysis)
LENOX)
SoluJon)
IdenJficaJon)
Move)to)Test)
N,CO)2.1.1:)))
"Selec-ng%the%Right%
Saw%for%the%Right%Job")
N,CO)2.1.2:)))
"Improving%the%
Produc-vity%of%Your%
Band%Saw")
N,CO)3.2:)))
%”SAWCALC:%Selec-ng%
the%Right%LENOX%Band%
Saw%Blade%for%the%Job"%
N,CO)4.1:)))
"LENOX%True%Test%
Blade%Test%Guide"%
OR
SUPERVISOR)/)
EXPERIENCED)
OPERATOR)
“On$the$Shop$
Floor”$
EXECUTIVE)/)
PLANT)
MANAGER)
“In$the$Office”$
N,CO)2.1.X:)))
”Accoun-ng%for%the%
Variability%of%Human%
Factors%in%Metal%
Cu=ng%Opera-ons")
N,CO)2.2.3:)))
”LENOX%Guide%to%
Band%Sawing")
UPDATED 20 MAY 2013
Buyer-­‐driven	
  Content	
  Offer	
  Nurture	
  Logic	
   Content	
  MarkeIng	
  Model	
  
Case Study: LENOX / Newell Rubbermaid
Approach: Inbound + Outbound
List	
  Rentals	
  (e.g.,	
  “The	
  Fabricator”)	
   LENOXtools.com	
  
Industrial	
  Metal	
  Cu`ng	
  
eNewsle$er	
  
#2: Shift to a Value-chain Model
for Systems and Data –
Underpinning Demand Process
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
‘Value-Chain’ Data + Systems Model
Moving to a ‘Value Chain’ Data Flow Model
A more complete profile of prospective customers
INCREASE	
  WHAT	
  IS	
  	
  
KNOWN	
  ABOUT	
  	
  
EACH	
  LEAD	
  
NARROW	
  DOWN	
  
THE	
  ‘LEAD’	
  SET	
  
SFDC	
  	
  +	
  
	
  Sales	
  	
  
AnalyIcs	
  
Data	
  	
  
Append	
  
MarkeIng	
  
AutomaIon	
  	
  
Inbound	
  	
  
MarkeIng	
  	
  
(w/	
  Social)	
  +	
  	
  
Web	
  CMS	
  
3P	
  List/	
  	
  
Ad	
  Impression/	
  
Outbound/	
  	
  
Event	
  
BI	
  +	
  	
  
Analy<cs	
  +	
  	
  
Dashboard	
  
A Demand Process View of Systems and Data
Marketing + Sales Technology Architecture
Case Study: LENOX / Newell Rubbermaid
Approach: MAP = Perpetual Engine
Alignment	
  of	
  People,	
  Process,	
  Content,	
  Technology	
   MAP	
  as	
  Perpetual	
  Demand	
  GeneraIon	
  Engine	
  
Upstream) Downstream)Midstream)
LENOX Lead Qualification Stages
Orientation of Buyer Dialogue Logic to Lead Qualification Stages
Trigger)Catalyst)
Root)Cause)
Analysis)
LENOX)
Solu?on)
Iden?fica?on)
Move))
to))
Test)
GTO)
Customer)
Decision)
NURTURE) CONVERT)ENGAGE)
Demand)Process)
Buyer)Dialogue)Logic)
Content)Marke?ng)Program)Element)Categories)
LENOX)Lead)Qualifica?on)Stages)
WARM) HOT)
TEST)PROSPECT) ENGAGED)
QUALIFIED)
ENGAGED)
QUALIFIED)
LEAD)
PURSUE) CONFIRM)
UPDATED 15 MAY 2013
Technology)Systems)Handling)
Silverpop)(ini?al)capture,)qualifica?on)and)Nurturing))) Silverpop)(con?nued)Nurturing)))
SFDC)(pipeline)management)))
#3: Structure Your Data
‘Progressively’
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Progressive Profiling
Structuring Data
Lead Management System Management
Marketo Revenue Cycle Model Example
Data Field Design
Delivering Demand Process Intelligence
Case Study: LENOX / Newell Rubbermaid
Approach: Lead Management Framework
Progressive	
  Profiling	
  Model	
   Behavioral	
  Scoring	
  Model	
  
#4: Re-think the KPIs at the
Core of Your ‘BI’
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Your Demand Process KPIs Must Be
Outcome-oriented
Moving From CPI to CPE and CPR
Client Example
Measure: CPI to CPE and CPR
Moving From Qualified Leads to
‘Closed / Won’
Client Example
Measure: Qualified Leads to Closed / Won – Conversion Rate
Client Example
Measure: Qualified Leads to Closed / Won – Velocity
Moving From Content Downloads to
Content Elasticity
Client Example
Measure: Content Downloads to Content Elasticity
This Must Be Part of a Demand
Process ‘Balanced Scorecard’
Demand Process KPIs
•  Engagement Performance
•  Content Offer Performance
•  Nurturing Email Performance
•  Lead Management Performance
•  Revenue Performance
•  Return on Investment Performance
Core KPI Categories
Takeaway: A Structured
Demand Process Is the
Key to Improving BI in
Demand Generation
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Thank You. Questions?
Twi$er:	
  @abneedles	
  
Contact
•  Me: Adam B. Needles
–  Chief Strategy Officer
–  P: 617-413-6087
–  E: adamneedles@annuitas.com
–  Tw: @abneedles
•  Us: ANNUITAS, Inc.
–  A: 3399 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30326
–  P: 404-751-5131
–  E: info@annuitas.com
–  Tw: @_ANNUITAS

Applying Business Intelligence in Demand Generation [webinar]

  • 1.
    Applying Business Intelligence (‘BI’)In Demand Generation Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 2.
    Who is ANNUITAS? • Founded in 2005 •  Headquartered in Atlanta, GA •  B2B Demand Process Transformation firm –  Demand generation change management –  Buying-process alignment –  Lead-to-revenue process context –  NPV / ROI / CLV focus •  Serving global, growth-oriented, $1B+ enterprise organizations –  Financial services –  Industrial –  Technology
  • 3.
    ANNUITAS Enterprise DemandGeneration Study Download at www.annuitas.com Source:    ANNUITAS,  “2014  B2B  Enterprise  Demand  Genera<on  Survey,”  November  2014.  
  • 4.
    What Is Obvious:We’re In a ‘2.0’ B2B Demand Generation Environment Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 5.
    Marketing Now (Should)Own a Majority of the Buying Process “[T]he  average  [B2B]   customer  had  completed   more  than  one-­‐half  of  the   purchase  decision-­‐making   process  prior  to  engaging   a  supplier  sales  rep   directly  …  .  At  the  upper   limit,  that  number  ran  as   high  as  70%  …  .”   Source:    The  Corporate  Execu<ve  Board  Company,  “The  Digital  Evolu<on  in  B2B  Marke<ng,”  2012.  
  • 6.
    Enterprise Demand GenerationEnvironment Marketing’s Top Goal Is Delivering ‘Quality Leads’ Through Demand Generation Source:    ANNUITAS,  “2014  B2B  Enterprise  Demand  Genera<on  Survey,”  November  2014.  
  • 7.
    CMOs Believe TheyMust Now Deliver ROI "Most  CMOs  are  struggling  in  one   vital  respect  —  return  on   investment  (ROI).  …  Nearly  two-­‐ thirds  of  CMOs  think  return  on   markeIng  investment  will  be  the   primary  measure  of  their   effecIveness  by  2015.  But  proving   that  value  is  difficult.”   Source:    IBM,  “From  Stretched  to  Strengthened,”  2011.  
  • 8.
    ‘On Paper’ B2BEnterprises Have Invested Heavily in Demand Generation Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 9.
    Enterprise Demand GenerationInvestments B2B Enterprises Have Invested Heavily in Demand Generation Staff Over the Last Five Years. Source:    ANNUITAS,  “2014  B2B  Enterprise  Demand  Genera<on  Survey,”  November  2014.  
  • 10.
    Everyone Has aContent Marketing Plan Source:    Content  Marke<ng  Ins<tute  and  Marke<ngProfs,  "B2B  Content  Marke<ng  2015  Benchmarks,  Budgets,  and  Trends  -­‐-­‐  North  America."  
  • 11.
    Enterprise Demand GenerationInvestments B2B Enterprises Run a Large Number of Tactical, Time-bound Demand Generation ‘Campaigns.’ Source:    ANNUITAS,  “2014  B2B  Enterprise  Demand  Genera<on  Survey,”  November  2014.  
  • 12.
    (Almost) Everyone HasMarketing Automation “In  a  recent  survey  of  business-­‐ to-­‐business  (B2B)  marketers,   we  found  that  slightly  more   than  50%  of  markeIng   organizaIons  had   implemented  a  system  to   manage  the  lead-­‐to-­‐revenue   process.”   Source:    Forrester,  "The  Forrester  WaveTM:  Lead-­‐To-­‐Revenue  Management  Pla_orm  Vendors,  Q1  2014,"  January  2014.  
  • 13.
    Yet There Remainsan Enterprise Demand Generation ‘Disconnect’ Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 14.
    Enterprise Demand GenerationDisconnect B2B Enterprises Lack Process Discipline. Source:    ANNUITAS,  “2014  B2B  Enterprise  Demand  Genera<on  Survey,”  November  2014.  
  • 15.
    Enterprise Demand GenerationDisconnect B2B Enterprise Demand Generation Today Fails to Hit the Mark. Source:    ANNUITAS,  “2014  B2B  Enterprise  Demand  Genera<on  Survey,”  November  2014.  
  • 16.
    How Do WeFix This Problem? Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 17.
    Implementations of Technology Systemsand Data for Demand Generation – By Themselves – Are Not a ‘Solution’
  • 18.
    ‘Big Data’ Analytics/ ‘BI’ – Alone – Cannot Improve Demand Generation
  • 19.
    Our Data andSystems in Demand Generation Need Structure … Otherwise ‘BI’ Is Useless …
  • 20.
    #1: Build aDemand Process Based on Buyer Journey and Dialogue Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 21.
    The Key IsGetting People AND Process AND Content AND Technology to Work Together
  • 22.
    It Is This‘Integrative’ Approach That Defines Successful Enterprise ‘Demand Process’
  • 23.
    … Which BICan Then Help Improve
  • 24.
  • 25.
    The Key Elementsof a Demand Process
  • 26.
    Demand Process Architecture AligningPeople, Process, Content and Technology
  • 27.
    Aligning Demand ProcessElements with Buyer Journey Demand Generation Program Design
  • 28.
    Case Study: LENOX/ Newell Rubbermaid Approach: Buyer Dialogue Logic Final Segmentation Approach Content Offer Segmentation by Persona + Cutting Type Supervisor*/*Experienced*Operator* “On$the$Shop$Floor”$ Execu4ve*/*Plant*Manager* “In$the$Office”$ General*Metal*Cu;ng*Industry! Fabricators! Metal*Service*Centers! Machine*Shops! Forges! UPDATED 20 MAY 2013 Buyer  SegmentaIon   Buyer  Dialogue  Logic   ‘New’  (Organic  /  MarkeIng-­‐led)     Buying  Stages   ‘Old’  (TradiIonal  /  Sales-­‐led)   Buying  Stages  
  • 29.
    Case Study: LENOX/ Newell Rubbermaid Approach: Content Marketing Model Content Marketing Model Overview QUALIFIED)ENGAGED)ENGAGED) QUALIFIED)LEAD) E,CO)1A:))) "Top%Five%Opera-ng% Challenges%in%the%% [X%Segment]%of%the% Metal%Cu=ng% Industry") E,CO)1B:))) "Metal%Cu=ng% Industry%Performance% Benchmark%Study") N,CO)2.1.0:))) "Common%Traits%of% High%Performing% Metal%Cu=ng% Opera-ons") E,CO)1) N,CO)2) N,CO)2.2.0:))) "ROI%Analysis%of% Making% Improvements%to%Cost% Per%Cut") N,CO)2.2.1:) "Managing%Blade% Manufacturer% Rela-onships%to% Improve%Cu=ng% Performance") N,CO)3.0:))) "LENOX%Customer% Case%Study%KK%LENOX% Band%Saw%Blade% Difference"! N,CO)3) N,CO)4) N,CO)2.2.2:))) "User%Error%or%Blade% Failure:%How%to% Know") N,CO)3.1:) "LENOX%Customer% Service%Difference%for% Band%Saw%Blades"% N,CO)4.0:) )"UpBlade%Challenge"% Offer% OR HOT)LEAD)WARM)LEAD) Note:%%Response%to%any%of%NKCO%2%content%offers%will%move%buyer% forward%to%NKCO%3.% Trigger) Catalyst) Root)Cause)Analysis) LENOX) SoluJon) IdenJficaJon) Move)to)Test) N,CO)2.1.1:))) "Selec-ng%the%Right% Saw%for%the%Right%Job") N,CO)2.1.2:))) "Improving%the% Produc-vity%of%Your% Band%Saw") N,CO)3.2:))) %”SAWCALC:%Selec-ng% the%Right%LENOX%Band% Saw%Blade%for%the%Job"% N,CO)4.1:))) "LENOX%True%Test% Blade%Test%Guide"% OR SUPERVISOR)/) EXPERIENCED) OPERATOR) “On$the$Shop$ Floor”$ EXECUTIVE)/) PLANT) MANAGER) “In$the$Office”$ N,CO)2.1.X:))) ”Accoun-ng%for%the% Variability%of%Human% Factors%in%Metal% Cu=ng%Opera-ons") N,CO)2.2.3:))) ”LENOX%Guide%to% Band%Sawing") UPDATED 20 MAY 2013 Buyer-­‐driven  Content  Offer  Nurture  Logic   Content  MarkeIng  Model  
  • 30.
    Case Study: LENOX/ Newell Rubbermaid Approach: Inbound + Outbound List  Rentals  (e.g.,  “The  Fabricator”)   LENOXtools.com   Industrial  Metal  Cu`ng   eNewsle$er  
  • 31.
    #2: Shift toa Value-chain Model for Systems and Data – Underpinning Demand Process Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 32.
    ‘Value-Chain’ Data +Systems Model Moving to a ‘Value Chain’ Data Flow Model A more complete profile of prospective customers INCREASE  WHAT  IS     KNOWN  ABOUT     EACH  LEAD   NARROW  DOWN   THE  ‘LEAD’  SET   SFDC    +    Sales     AnalyIcs   Data     Append   MarkeIng   AutomaIon     Inbound     MarkeIng     (w/  Social)  +     Web  CMS   3P  List/     Ad  Impression/   Outbound/     Event   BI  +     Analy<cs  +     Dashboard  
  • 33.
    A Demand ProcessView of Systems and Data Marketing + Sales Technology Architecture
  • 34.
    Case Study: LENOX/ Newell Rubbermaid Approach: MAP = Perpetual Engine Alignment  of  People,  Process,  Content,  Technology   MAP  as  Perpetual  Demand  GeneraIon  Engine   Upstream) Downstream)Midstream) LENOX Lead Qualification Stages Orientation of Buyer Dialogue Logic to Lead Qualification Stages Trigger)Catalyst) Root)Cause) Analysis) LENOX) Solu?on) Iden?fica?on) Move)) to)) Test) GTO) Customer) Decision) NURTURE) CONVERT)ENGAGE) Demand)Process) Buyer)Dialogue)Logic) Content)Marke?ng)Program)Element)Categories) LENOX)Lead)Qualifica?on)Stages) WARM) HOT) TEST)PROSPECT) ENGAGED) QUALIFIED) ENGAGED) QUALIFIED) LEAD) PURSUE) CONFIRM) UPDATED 15 MAY 2013 Technology)Systems)Handling) Silverpop)(ini?al)capture,)qualifica?on)and)Nurturing))) Silverpop)(con?nued)Nurturing))) SFDC)(pipeline)management)))
  • 35.
    #3: Structure YourData ‘Progressively’ Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Lead Management SystemManagement Marketo Revenue Cycle Model Example
  • 38.
    Data Field Design DeliveringDemand Process Intelligence
  • 39.
    Case Study: LENOX/ Newell Rubbermaid Approach: Lead Management Framework Progressive  Profiling  Model   Behavioral  Scoring  Model  
  • 40.
    #4: Re-think theKPIs at the Core of Your ‘BI’ Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 41.
    Your Demand ProcessKPIs Must Be Outcome-oriented
  • 42.
    Moving From CPIto CPE and CPR
  • 43.
  • 44.
    Moving From QualifiedLeads to ‘Closed / Won’
  • 45.
    Client Example Measure: QualifiedLeads to Closed / Won – Conversion Rate
  • 46.
    Client Example Measure: QualifiedLeads to Closed / Won – Velocity
  • 47.
    Moving From ContentDownloads to Content Elasticity
  • 48.
    Client Example Measure: ContentDownloads to Content Elasticity
  • 49.
    This Must BePart of a Demand Process ‘Balanced Scorecard’
  • 50.
    Demand Process KPIs • Engagement Performance •  Content Offer Performance •  Nurturing Email Performance •  Lead Management Performance •  Revenue Performance •  Return on Investment Performance Core KPI Categories
  • 51.
    Takeaway: A Structured DemandProcess Is the Key to Improving BI in Demand Generation Twi$er:  @abneedles  
  • 52.
  • 53.
    Contact •  Me: AdamB. Needles –  Chief Strategy Officer –  P: 617-413-6087 –  E: adamneedles@annuitas.com –  Tw: @abneedles •  Us: ANNUITAS, Inc. –  A: 3399 Peachtree Road, NE, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA 30326 –  P: 404-751-5131 –  E: info@annuitas.com –  Tw: @_ANNUITAS