SEXUAL SELECTION
• Specialtype of natural selection
• Natural Selection – “Struggle for
Existence”
• Sexual Selection – “Struggles for
Mates”
• Male competition; female choice
3.
THEORY OF SEXUAL
SELECTION
•Proposed by Charles Darwin in
1871
• “…the advantage, which
certain individuals have over
others of the same sex and
species, in exclusive relation to
reproduction.”
• An explanation for beautiful
plumage of peacock
4.
• Considered itsignificant for
the gradual perfection of the
sexual process
• Attributes to the development
of plumage, courtship dances,
songs, other secondary sexual
characters and even female’s
choice of mates
THEORY OF SEXUAL
SELECTION
5.
INTRASEXUAL &
INTERSEXUAL SELECTION
Thedifferences in individuals’ breeding success rate depends on two
factors:
• Competition within one sex (mostly males) for access to
members of opposite sex – Intrasexual selection
• Choice by individuals of one sex (mostly females) for members of
opposite sex – Intersexual selection
6.
INTRASEXUAL SELECTION
• Involvesthe male-male
competition for a potential mate
– mate rivalry
• Observed in many species of birds
and mammals
• Examples include mate rivalry
between two male red deers,
elephant seals or sunfish
7.
• Best explainedthrough the
competition between two stags of red
deer, Cervus elaphus
• Initially, the males challenge each
other by roaring
• If the roaring capacity of both stags is
same then they approach and walk
parallel to each other
• In some cases, they fight by
interlocking antlers and pushing each
other.
MATE RIVALRY IN RED DEERS
8.
MATE RIVALRY INELEPHANT
SEALS
• It is influenced by the female
• When a male tries to copulate,
the female elephant seal will make
a loud call to alert all other males.
• Then the males will fight and the
first male to prove its dominance
will get to copulate the female.
9.
MATE RIVALRY IN
SUNFISH
•The males defend territory until
the female comes and lays eggs.
• As the female lays eggs, the male
fertilizes them.
• However, subordinate males
(female mimics) may quickly
dart-in between them
• Thus, the male of choice and the
subordinate male has the chance
to fertilize the eggs of the female.
10.
INTERSEXUAL SELECTION
• Femalechooses a male
based on certain traits
• Huxley called it epigamic
selection
Bright,
extravagant and
colourful fins
of fishes, long
colourful tail of
peacock,
dancing as seen
in birds of
paradise and
mating calls
11.
CONTROVERSY
• Wallace arguesthat male-male
competition is a part of natural
selection – form of struggle for
existence
• Bright and attracting features of
males - attraction for predators
• Argued that for the
development of these features,
lot of energy is required -
against the principle of natural
selection.
12.
SEXUAL SELECTION IN
HUMANS
•Darwin (1871) thought sexual selection was more important than natural
selection in the evolution of the differences between the human races
• Geoffrey Miller – humor, music, visual art, verbal creativity & even
vocabulary – not survival benefits but courtship adaptation favored by
sexual selection
Example: Miller (2000) proposed that greater vocabulary demonstrate
intelligence (fitness) to potential mate
Experiment: Males use greater lower-frequency vocabulary when in
romantic mindset (Rosenberg & Tunney, 2008)
13.
SEXUAL SELECTION IN
HUMANS
•Secondary sexual characters like facial hair, vocal characteristics appear
to have been shaped by sexual selection
• Men’s secondary sexual traits like robust face, beard and deep voice are
more effective in intimidating men than attracting women
• Men’s dominance and social status – preferences of women
• Women’s physical appearance – competition for male choice (Puts,
2016)
14.
CONCLUSION
Though there aremany
oppositions,
it provides an
explanation for certain
features
that cannot be
explained by
Natural Selection
15.
REFERENCES – BOOKS
#McFarlandD., Animal Behaviour – Psychobiology, Ethology and
Evolution, Longman Group UK Ltd, 1985.
#Gundevia H.S., Singh H.G., A Textbook of Animal Behaviour, 2nd
Edition, S. Chand & Company Ltd., New Delhi, 2006.
#Chattopadhyay S., LIFE – Evolution, Adaptation & Ethology, 2nd
Edition, BOOKS & ALLIED (P) LTD., Kolkata, 2009.
#Verma P.S., Agarwal V.K., Cell Biology, Genetics, Molecular Biology,
Evolution and Ecology, Multicolor Edition, S. Chand & Company
Ltd., New Delhi, 2009.
REFERENCES – ARTICLES
#Kirkpatrick,M. (1987). Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous
animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18(1), 43-70.
#Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION
OF FEMALE CHOICE. Evolution, 36(1), 1-12.
#Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2003). A sexual selection theory
longitudinal analysis of sexual segregation and integration in early
adolescence. Journal of experimental child psychology, 85(3), 257-278.
#Puts , D. (2016). Human Sexual Selection. Current Opinion in
Psychology, 7, 28-32.