Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Colm Campbell - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
AARO SUONIO - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Martin Snoddon - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Brandon Hamber - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
1
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Viviana Vanrel
Amanda Rice
Cely
Rosalyn Johnson
Tyler Wescott
ETH/321
April 27, 2015
Angela Beetem
Introduction
Alternative Dispute Resolution also known as Appropriate Dispute Resolution is a term used to
describe a way in which disputes are settled without the help/support from courts. This
technique will resolve disputes in a non-confrontational way whereby parties involved will
engage in a negotiation state and come up with a mutually agreed solution to solve their
disputes.
Disputes/ conflicts have existed in all cultures, religions, and societies since time immemorial, as
long as humans have walked the earth. In fact, they also exist in the animal kingdom.
Philosophies and procedures for dealing with conflicts have been part of the human heritage,
differing between cultures and societies. Nations, groups, and individuals have tried throughout
history to manage conflicts in order to minimize the negative and undesirable effects that they
may pose. Conflicts can develop in any situation where people interact, in every situation where
two or more persons, or groups of people, perceive that their interests are opposing, and that
these interests cannot be met to the satisfaction of all the parties involved. Since conflicts a
have become a part of human interaction, one must learn to handle them in a way that will
prevent further disagreement and learn how to come up with best solution, innovative and
creative ideas to resolve them. The ADR “movement” started in the United States in the 1970s
in response to the need to find more efficient and effective alternatives to litigation. Today, ADR
is flourishing throughout the world because it has proven itself, in multiple ways, to be a better
way to resolve disputes.
The various forms of an alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Alternative dispute resolution has various form which include
Negotiation
Negotiation is a process in which parties to a dispute discuss possible outcomes
directly with each other. Parties exchange proposals and demands, make arguments,
and continue the discussion until a solution is reached, or an impasse declared. In
negotiations there are three approaches to resolving the dispute, each with a
different orientation and focus, interest based, rights based, and power based and
they can result in different outcomes.
Interest Based Negotiation
This approach shifts the focus of the discussion from positions to interests. Because
there are many interests underlying any position, a discussion based on interests
opens up a range of possibilities and creative options, whereas positions very often
cannot be reconciled and may therefore lead to a dead end. The dialogue on interest
should be transparent, in order for the parties to arrive at an agreement that will
satisfy the needs and interests of the parties.
Rights Based Negotiation
When negotiati.
Colm Campbell - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
AARO SUONIO - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Martin Snoddon - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Brandon Hamber - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de pazLokarri
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
Foro Soziala erakunde anitz eta pluralek batera nazioarteko erakundeekin elkarlanean burututako ekimen bat da. Haren xedea gizartearen parte-hartzea sustatzea da bake prozesua bultzatzearren.
------------------
El Foro Social es una iniciativa conjunta de organizaciones diversas y plurales, en colaboración con entidades internacionales, que quiere fomentar la participación de la sociedad en el impulso del proceso de paz. Se ha celebrado en Pamplona y Bilbao el 14 y 15 de marzo de 2013.
1
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Viviana Vanrel
Amanda Rice
Cely
Rosalyn Johnson
Tyler Wescott
ETH/321
April 27, 2015
Angela Beetem
Introduction
Alternative Dispute Resolution also known as Appropriate Dispute Resolution is a term used to
describe a way in which disputes are settled without the help/support from courts. This
technique will resolve disputes in a non-confrontational way whereby parties involved will
engage in a negotiation state and come up with a mutually agreed solution to solve their
disputes.
Disputes/ conflicts have existed in all cultures, religions, and societies since time immemorial, as
long as humans have walked the earth. In fact, they also exist in the animal kingdom.
Philosophies and procedures for dealing with conflicts have been part of the human heritage,
differing between cultures and societies. Nations, groups, and individuals have tried throughout
history to manage conflicts in order to minimize the negative and undesirable effects that they
may pose. Conflicts can develop in any situation where people interact, in every situation where
two or more persons, or groups of people, perceive that their interests are opposing, and that
these interests cannot be met to the satisfaction of all the parties involved. Since conflicts a
have become a part of human interaction, one must learn to handle them in a way that will
prevent further disagreement and learn how to come up with best solution, innovative and
creative ideas to resolve them. The ADR “movement” started in the United States in the 1970s
in response to the need to find more efficient and effective alternatives to litigation. Today, ADR
is flourishing throughout the world because it has proven itself, in multiple ways, to be a better
way to resolve disputes.
The various forms of an alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Alternative dispute resolution has various form which include
Negotiation
Negotiation is a process in which parties to a dispute discuss possible outcomes
directly with each other. Parties exchange proposals and demands, make arguments,
and continue the discussion until a solution is reached, or an impasse declared. In
negotiations there are three approaches to resolving the dispute, each with a
different orientation and focus, interest based, rights based, and power based and
they can result in different outcomes.
Interest Based Negotiation
This approach shifts the focus of the discussion from positions to interests. Because
there are many interests underlying any position, a discussion based on interests
opens up a range of possibilities and creative options, whereas positions very often
cannot be reconciled and may therefore lead to a dead end. The dialogue on interest
should be transparent, in order for the parties to arrive at an agreement that will
satisfy the needs and interests of the parties.
Rights Based Negotiation
When negotiati.
Delivering value through data future agenda 2019Future Agenda
Delivering value through data - final report. Throughout 2018, Future Agenda canvassed the views of a wide range of 900 experts with different backgrounds and perspectives from around the world, to provide their insights on the future value of data. Supported by Facebook and many other organisations, we held 30 workshops across 24 countries in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Europe. In them, we reviewed the data landscape across the globe, as it is now, and how experts think it will evolve over the next five to ten years.
The aim? To gain a better understanding of how perspectives and priorities differ across the world, and to use the diverse voices and viewpoints to help governments, organisations, and individuals to better understand what they need to do to realise data’s full potential.
We are not aware of any other exercise of this scale or scope. No other project we know of has carefully and methodically canvassed the views of such a wide range of experts from such a diverse range of backgrounds and geographical locations. The result, we hope, delivers a more comprehensive picture of the sheer variety of issues and views thrown up by a fast-evolving ‘data economy’ than can be found elsewhere. And, by providing this rich set of perspectives, we aim to help businesses and governments - to develop the policies, strategies, and innovations that realise the full potential of data (personal, social, economic, commercial), while addressing potential harms, both locally and globally.
For more details see the dedicated website www.deliveringvaluethroughdata.org
Based on the case study of Green and Inclusive Growth in Bolivia, performed by MA. María Rosa Gamarra C. supported by the PhD. Ludwig Torres C. within the regional project of LATN Network, took place the “First National Dialogue on Green and Inclusive Growth in Bolivia: Can The Green and Inclusive Growth can contribute to overcome the primary export pattern in Bolivia under the Law of Mother Earth and Development for Living Well?”
Multilateralism is a process of organizing relations between groups of three or more states in pursuit of a common goal. Multilateralism is based on certain principles that shape the character of the arrangement or institution, such as cooperation, equality, and legitimacy. Multilateralism often favors strengthening the United Nations and other international institutions that involve as many of the world's nations as possible.
Final document of the First National Dialogue on Green and Inclusive Growth in Bolivia within the project of LATN Network, focused on knowledge creation and knowledge brokering from a political economy approach.
Katherine Marshall is a Senior Fellow at the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, and Visiting Professor in the School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. She is also Executive Director of the World Faiths Development Dialogue (WFDD), an NGO that works to bridge the worlds of development and religion.
I spoke to the following slides at a conference on industrial relations in South Africa at the end of 2014, a time of particular turbulence in the country. My thesis was that a tripartite alliance between government, labour and business was the only way to break deadlock in the labour market in the country, and conjectured that Cyril Ramaphosa was the only man within the ANC with the vision, credibility and strength to accomplish this task. On the day I didn't have much enthusiasm for my views, and the future felt bleak.
This notwithstanding, I hope to be continue to be proven right that anything is possible in a country as remarkable as South Africa. What we lose in the fire we find in the ashes.
Delivering value through data future agenda 2019Future Agenda
Delivering value through data - final report. Throughout 2018, Future Agenda canvassed the views of a wide range of 900 experts with different backgrounds and perspectives from around the world, to provide their insights on the future value of data. Supported by Facebook and many other organisations, we held 30 workshops across 24 countries in Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Europe. In them, we reviewed the data landscape across the globe, as it is now, and how experts think it will evolve over the next five to ten years.
The aim? To gain a better understanding of how perspectives and priorities differ across the world, and to use the diverse voices and viewpoints to help governments, organisations, and individuals to better understand what they need to do to realise data’s full potential.
We are not aware of any other exercise of this scale or scope. No other project we know of has carefully and methodically canvassed the views of such a wide range of experts from such a diverse range of backgrounds and geographical locations. The result, we hope, delivers a more comprehensive picture of the sheer variety of issues and views thrown up by a fast-evolving ‘data economy’ than can be found elsewhere. And, by providing this rich set of perspectives, we aim to help businesses and governments - to develop the policies, strategies, and innovations that realise the full potential of data (personal, social, economic, commercial), while addressing potential harms, both locally and globally.
For more details see the dedicated website www.deliveringvaluethroughdata.org
Based on the case study of Green and Inclusive Growth in Bolivia, performed by MA. María Rosa Gamarra C. supported by the PhD. Ludwig Torres C. within the regional project of LATN Network, took place the “First National Dialogue on Green and Inclusive Growth in Bolivia: Can The Green and Inclusive Growth can contribute to overcome the primary export pattern in Bolivia under the Law of Mother Earth and Development for Living Well?”
Multilateralism is a process of organizing relations between groups of three or more states in pursuit of a common goal. Multilateralism is based on certain principles that shape the character of the arrangement or institution, such as cooperation, equality, and legitimacy. Multilateralism often favors strengthening the United Nations and other international institutions that involve as many of the world's nations as possible.
Final document of the First National Dialogue on Green and Inclusive Growth in Bolivia within the project of LATN Network, focused on knowledge creation and knowledge brokering from a political economy approach.
Katherine Marshall is a Senior Fellow at the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs, and Visiting Professor in the School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. She is also Executive Director of the World Faiths Development Dialogue (WFDD), an NGO that works to bridge the worlds of development and religion.
I spoke to the following slides at a conference on industrial relations in South Africa at the end of 2014, a time of particular turbulence in the country. My thesis was that a tripartite alliance between government, labour and business was the only way to break deadlock in the labour market in the country, and conjectured that Cyril Ramaphosa was the only man within the ANC with the vision, credibility and strength to accomplish this task. On the day I didn't have much enthusiasm for my views, and the future felt bleak.
This notwithstanding, I hope to be continue to be proven right that anything is possible in a country as remarkable as South Africa. What we lose in the fire we find in the ashes.
Similar to Andy Carl - Foro Social para impulsar el proceso de paz (20)
Bake-prozesuaren Behatoki Soziala ekimen bat da eta helburu du herritarren parte-hartzea sustatzea eta, aldi berean, interesa duten herritar guztiek bakeari eta bizikidetzari buruz zer iritzi duten adieraztea.
---------------------------------------------
El Observatorio Social del proceso de paz es una iniciativa que tiene como objetivo fomentar la participación ciudadana y generar un espacio donde todas las personas interesadas puedan exponer su opinión sobre la paz y la convivencia.
Bake-prozesuaren Behatoki Soziala ekimen bat da eta helburu du herritarren parte-hartzea sustatzea eta, aldi berean, interesa duten herritar guztiek bakeari eta bizikidetzari buruz zer iritzi duten adieraztea.
Informazio gehiaho: www.lokarri.org
Observatorios Social Proceso de Paz - Informe Verano 09Lokarri
El Observatorio Social del proceso de paz es una iniciativa que tiene como objetivo fomentar la participación ciudadana y generar un espacio donde todas las personas interesadas puedan exponer su opinión sobre la paz y la convivencia.
Más info en www.lokarri.org
Itxi egin gara hitz egiteko eta akordioetara iristeko honako galderaren inguruan: Zer egin dezake gure gizarteak preso eta atxilotutakoen giza eskubide guztiekiko errespetua bermatzeko?
-------------------------------------------------
Conclusiones del encierro de Lokarri donde se trabajó el tema del respeto a los Derechos Humanos de las personas presas y detenidas
Lokarri Akordioaren eta Kontsultaren aldeko herritarren Sareak “Itxialdia” ekimena antolatu du herri-partaidetza bultzatzeko bakearen eta akordioaren aldeko lanean.
Lehendabiziko Itxialdi honen 8 ordu, zeinetik 24 ondorio hauek atera diren indarkeriaren amaierari buruz
Lokarri, Red ciudadana por el acuerdo y la consulta, ha organizado la iniciativa "Itxialdia - Encerrados" con el objetivo de fomentar la participación ciudadana en el trabajo por la paz y el acuerdo.
8 horas de este primer encierro del que se han extraído estas 24 conclusiones sobre el fin de la violencia.
Lokarri akordioaren eta kontsultaren aldeko herritarren Sareak hausnarketa ariketa bat abiatu du datorren urteetarako bere lehentasunak eta planak zehazteko. Bukaera datorren urtarrilaren 31n Ohiz kanpoko Batzar Nagusi batean izango duen eztabaida honek oinarrizko txosten bat du abiapuntu, zeinak aldaketak izango dituen batzar prozesu honen baitan. Hauek dira txostenak biltzen dituen ideia nagusiak:
Lokarri, Red ciudadana por el acuerdo y la consulta, ha iniciado una reflexión para definir sus prioridades y planes de actuación para los próximos años. Este debate, que culminará con la celebración de una Asamblea General Extraordinaria el próximo 31 de enero, tiene como punto de partida una ponencia-base, que sufrirá modificaciones durante este proceso asambleario, cuyas principales ideas son las siguientes.
2. The peace process paradigm?
Preparing for peace talks
Negotiations
Agreement
Post-conflict peacebuilding
Disarmament
Demobilisation
Integration
Governance reform
Truth Commissions/Special Courts
Economic Development
Peaceful Coexistence?
How to move a process forward if one stage is weak or missing?
3. Three Domains of Reconciliation
(1) Changing Attitudes & Public Conversation
Two examples:
Radio Diaries Project (Georgia & Abkhazia)
Karabakh 2015: a “futures forum”
4. Three Domains of Reconciliation
(2) Reforming Public Institutions & Law
Two examples:
Fiji: Developing National Curriculum on teaching history
Uganda: Drafting legislation on amnesty and return
5. Three Domains of Reconciliation
(3) Changing Behaviour and Relationships
Two examples:
Colombia/Philippines: Women Leader’s exchange programme
Georgia/Abkhazia: Young party political leader’s dialogue
6. The Many Paths to Peace
Conflict Transformation Vision
+Capacity
+Opportunity
+Initiative
=Change
7. On Winning the Peace
Some general principles:
There is no roadmap but you are on the road
Reconciliation (and conciliation) involves work on multiple levels with
multiple actors (government, parties and wider civsoc)
The need to have the Difficult yet Collaborative Conversations
Understanding differences: bridging the divides: finding common
ground
Value in-betweeners and Consensus Figures
The need to learn and teach the tools and tactics of dialogue
There is a creative tension between the struggle for truth, justice
and peace
My two illustrious Professors: Colm Campbell a Lawyer and international authority on transitional justice – and Brandon Hamber a clinical psychologist by training – and also a professor at the Univerisity of Ulster in N.Ireland– and an renowned expert on transition and reconciliation and a world-class Tweeter Like both my colleagues I am a practitioner – but as I am not at teacher I will try to pick up where we left off yesterday in Pamplona in our discussion on human rights in a peace process –offer some very general framing remarks – give a few experiences and offer some conclusions
*The Bad News is that your peace process has gone off the map *In fact even those processes that have been successful at following the map have found themselves experiencing so much violence that they are talking of a new peace process *The Good News is that you are moving forward and making progress * Perhaps a more appropriate diagramme for this progress may look at bit the logo of Lokarri? *In the early 1990’s - in the depths of the repression in Guatemala –and after final peace agreements were signed when there was little – the Catholic Church – or more specifically a very courageous priest and Bishop Msgr Gerardi – working in the largely indigenous province of Quiche – launched a very creative project called the Recovery of Historical Memory Project – at the end of 36years of war. (murdered 2-days after the report was published) 800 testimony taker/5,000 tesimonies/55,000 victims – their evidence formed the basis of the first archive of the Guatemalan Truth Commission.
Of course This Social Forum is about articulating a vision for consolidating the peace and agenda for change Yesterday Mark Freeman spoke about changing what he called the Dominant Narrative and developing a new inclusive collective narrative – but how? We realised early on that evangelising for peace – printing T-shirts, paying for public ads had limited impact – we need to find better ways to reach and involve people So when the ways in which talk about the conflict – or think about peace gets stuck – or when there is no public constituency for peace and reconciliation – What can we do?
Fiji a collaboration between a diverse civil society group (including both academics and activists) working in partnership with the Minister of Education Uganda the initiative began with family members of abductees – and working with Parliament they put together a draft bill which acknowledged their local traditional processes of accountability and reconciliation – and this provided a mechanism for the return of tens of thousands of young people.
I see a core dimension of finding succesessful ways of living and working together – is engagement and dialogue. What peace advocates pay attention to is where are the conflict divides that need to be bridged and how to bridge them (we need to pay attention both to what divides us and what brings us together) Like having a stroke – and learning how to talk all over again Single commnunity work – cross community work? We draw strength and confidence from our friends and family but we make peace by engaging with our opposition and those we most disagree with (not to befriend them but to find a way to recognise their humanity and live alongside them
This Social Forum is about articulating a vision for consolidating the peace and agenda for change Building on what you know and what you have learned – Somalia has a lot to teach the world about local peacemaking: Colombia has a lot to teach the world on peacemaking; The Basque conflict has a lot to teach the world about reconciliation (theory and practice)
The imprtance of knowing who you wish to make peace with