ANALYSIS AND Interpretationvivibbboboo.pptx

THESIS PRESENTATION BY
MISS ANISHA MADHURI BECK
M.SC. NURSING SECOND YEAR
MENTAL HEALTH NURSING
RITCON RAIPUR (C.G)

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
 A quasi-experimental study to assess the effectiveness of origami crafts on test
anxiety reduction among children in selected hospital, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

OBJECTIVES
 To assess pre-test and post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
experimental and control group
 To determine the effectiveness of Origami in reducing anxiety level of hospitalized
children in experimental group.
 To compare the pre and post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
control group.
 To compare the post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
 To find the association between pre-test level of anxiety among hospitalized
children in experimental and control group with selected demographic variables.

HYPOTHESES
 H1: There will be a significant difference between the pre- and post- test level of
anxiety among hospitalized children in experimental and control group.
 H2: There will be a significant association between pre-test level of Anxiety among
hospitalized children in experimental and control group with selected
demographic variables.

OPERATIONAL DEFINITION
EFFECTIVENESS
 In this study effectiveness refers to the positive outcome of origami on anxiety
among hospitalized children as measured by Behavioral observational checklist on
hospitalized anxiety.

 ORIGAMI
 Origami also called paper folding, art of folding objects out of paper to create both
two-dimensional and three-dimensional subjects. In this study, origami refers to an
art of folding paper into decorate figures as of fish, jumping frog, Tulip Flower,
Wind mill, Paper Flower, Dog, Butterfly, Rose, and Lotus by the children as per
investigator guidelines.

 ANXIETY
 In this study it refers to the child reaction during vocalization, gaze behaviour,
reaction to therapeutic procedures and reaction related to loss of control as
measured by Behavioural observational checklist on hospitalized anxiety.

 HOSPITALIZED CHILDREN
 In this study refers to children admitted to the paediatric ward, between the age group of 6-10 years.
 ASSUMPTIONS
 Level of anxiety may differ in between male and female child.
 Majority of the children staying at hospital may have different level of anxiety.
 Origami craft may bring Reduction in the level of anxiety among hospitalised child.
 DELIMITATION
 The study is delimited to
 Children who are admitted in paediatric ward and children who are available at the time of data
collection.
 6-10 years children
 those who are anxious
 Observation of the children by the investigator only during day time.
 the interventions are given only when the child is interested
 Hospitalized children and their mothers who are willing to participate in the study
 Data collection period is limited to 1 month

RESEARCH APPROACH
(Quantitative research approach)
RESEARCH DESIGN
(Quasi experimental research design)
TARGET POPULATION
(Children)
ACCESIBLE POPULATION
(children in Bal Gopal hospital Raipur C.G.)
SETTING OF STUDY
(selected hospital Raipur C.G)
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
(purposive sampling technique)
SAMPLE SIZE
(Sample size 60 children)
VARIABLE
TOOL FOR DATA COLLECTION
(Section A-socio demographic data)
(Section B- Self-structured questions)
DATAANALYSIS
(Descriptive and inferential data)
RESEARCH FINDING

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
AGE
Experimental group Control group
Frequenc
y(f)
Percentag
e (%)
Frequenc
y(f)
Percentag
e (%)
6-8 Year 18 60 16 53.33
9-10 year 12 40 14 46.66
Total 3
0
100% 30 100%
Distribution of subject according to the socio
demographic variables.
Table 1
Distribution of subjects based on age
N=60
Experimental group
control group
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
6-8 Year 9-10 year
18
12
16
14
BASED ON AGE
Experimental group control group

Table -2
Distribution of subjects based on gender
N=60
GENDER
Frequenc
y(f)
Percentag
e (%)
Frequenc
y(f)
Percentage
(%)
MALE 20 66.66 17 56.66
FEMALE 10 33.33 13 43.33
Total 3
0
100% 3
0
100%
Experimental group
control group
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
male female
20
10
17
13
BASED ON GENDER

Table – 3
Distribution of subjects based on Birth order of the
child N=60
Birth order
of the
child
Frequen
cy(f)
Percentag
e (%)
Frequency(f) Percentage (%)
Fist 05 16.66 08 26.66
Seco
nd
15 50 12 40
Thir
d
08 26.66 06 20
Four
th
02 6.66 04 13.33
Total 30 100% 30 100%
5
8
15
2
8
6
12
4
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
first second third fourth
BIRTH ODER OF THE CHILD
experimental group control group

Table - 4
Distribution of subjects based on type family
N=60
Type Family
Freque
ncy(f)
Percent
age (%)
Freque
ncy(
f)
Percen
tage
(%)
Nuclear
family
15 50 14 46.6
6
Joint
family
12 40 13 43.3
3
Separated02 6.67 01 3.33
Extended
family
01 3.33 02 6.67
Total 3
0
100% 3
0
100%
Expeimental Group
Control Group
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
15
12
2
1
14
13
1
2
BASED ON TYPE OF FAMILY
Expeimental Group Control Group

Table - 5
Distribution of subjects based on income
N=60
Income
Frequ
ency(f
)
Percent
age (%)
Frequ
enc
y(f)
Perce
ntage
(%)
Below
5000/-
10 33.33 11 36.
66
5001 to
10000/-
06 20 05 16.
66
10001 to
15000/-
05 16.66 04 13.
33
15001
to 20000/-
05 16.66 07 23.
33
Above
20001/-
4 13.33 2 6.6
6
Total 3
0
100% 3
0
100%
10
6
5 5
4
11
5
4
7
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Below 5000/- 5001 to
10000/-
10001 to
15000/-
15001
to 20000/-
Above
20001/-
BASED ON INCOME

Table - 6
Distribution of subjects based on Number of siblings
N=60
Number of
siblings
Freque
ncy(f)
Percent
age (%)
Frequ
en
cy(
f)
Perce
ntage
(%)
One 02 6.66 06 20
Two 16 53.33 14 46.
66
More than
two
12 40 10 33.
33
Total 3
0
100% 30 100%
Experiment…
control…
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
One Two More than two
6.66
53.33
40
20
46.66
33.33
BASED ON NUMBER OF SIBLINGS

Table - 7
Distribution of subjects based on Area of Residence
N=60
Area
residence
Freque
ncy(f)
Percent
age (%)
Freque
ncy(
f)
Perc
enta
ge
(%)
Urban
area
15 50 14 46
.6
6
Rural
area
15 50 16 53
.3
3
Total 3
0
100% 3
0
100%
15 15
14
16
13
13.5
14
14.5
15
15.5
16
16.5
Urban area Rural area
BASED ON AREA OF RESIDENCE
Experimental group
Control group

Table - 8
Distribution of subjects based on religion
N=60
Religion
Freque
ncy(f)
Percent
age (%)
Freq
ue
nc
y(
f)
Percen
tage
(%)
Hindu 16 53.33 14 46.6
6
Muslim 05 16.66 06 20
Christian 06 20 05 16.6
6
Others (if yes;
specify)
03 10 05 16.6
6
Total 3
0
100% 30 100%
experimental group
Control group
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Hindu Muslim Christian Others (if
yes;
specify)
16
5
6
3
14
6
5 5
BASED ON RELIGION
experimental group Control group

Table no 9
Analysis of post-test and post-test knowledge score of level of
anxiety among hospitalized children in experimental by using
frequency, percentage
Level of
Anxiety
Pretest Post Test
Frequency
(f)
Percentag
e
(%)
Frequenc
y
(f)
Percentag
e
(%)
Mild 10 33.33% 18 60%
Modera
te
09 30% 07 23.33%
Severe 11 36.66% 05 16.66%
pretest
post test
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
mild moderate severe
33%
30%
37%
60%
23%
17%
pretest post test

Table no 10
Analysis of post-test and post-test knowledge score of level of anxiety among
hospitalized children in control group by using frequency, percentage
Level of
Anxiety
Pretest Posttest
Frequency
(f)
Percenta
ge
(%)
Frequen
cy
(f)
Percenta
ge
(%)
Mild 07 23.33% 17 56.66%
Modera
te
08 26.66% 07 23.33%
Severe 15 50% 06 20%
pretest
post test
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
mild moderate severe
23%
27%
50%
57%
23%
20%
pretest post test

TABLE NO. 11
Analysis of effectiveness of origami crafts by using “t” of test anxiety
reduction
N=60
TEST
Mean Mean% SD Mean diff Paired t value Df/Critical
value
Significa
nce
Pretest 62.1
49.25
16.97
18.06 18.06
59/2.66 <0.001
Posttest
48.91
72.25
15.45
TEST
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
PRETEST POSTTEST
49.25
72.25
TEST
TEST

TABLE NO. 12
Analysis of compare the pre and post-test level of anxiety among
hospitalized children in Experimental group
TEST Mean Mean% SD Mean diff Paired t value Df/Critical
value
Significa
nce
Pretest 59.93
55
16.82
11.73 11.62
59/2.66 <0.001
Posttest
48.2
41.2
15.12
TEST
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PRETEST POSTTEST
59.93
48.2
TEST
TEST

TABLE NO. 13
Analysis of compare the pre and post-test level of anxiety among
hospitalized children in control group
TEST
Mean Mean% SD Mean diff Paired t value Df/Critica
l value
Significanc
e
Pretest 49.63 42 15.74
14.63 14.06
59/2.66 <0.001
Posttest
64.63
75
16.84
TEST
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
PRETEST POSTTEST
49.63
64.63
TEST
TEST

Table no 14
Chi-square analysis to find out association between the pretest knowledge
score with their socio-demographic
N=60
S. No. Socio demographic
variables
Pre-test Total Chi- square
value
Df Inference
Mild Moderate Severe
1 Age group (years) 17 17 26
60
2.78 2 Not significant
2 Gender 17 17 26 13.48 2 Significant
3 Birth order of child 17 17 26 7.21 6 Not Significant
4 Family type 17 17 26 14.24 6 Significant
5 Religion 17 17 26 7.45 6 Not significant
6 Financial background 17 17 26 10.21 6 Not Significant
7 Number of siblings 17 17 26 18.67 4 Significant
8 Area of residence 17 17 26 9.05 2 Significant

DISCUSSION
 This chapter discusses the findings of the study to assess the effectiveness
of origami crafts on test anxiety reduction among children in selected hospital
Raipur.
 In order to achieve the objective of the study survey approach was adopted. A
non-probability purposive technique was used to select the sample the data
was collected from 60 sample.

OBJECTIVE
1) To assess the pre-test and post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
2) To determine the effectiveness of Origami in reducing anxiety level of hospitalized
children in experimental group.
3) To compare the pre and post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in control
group.
4) To compare the post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in experimental and
control group
5) To find the association between pre-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
experimental and control group with selected demographic variables.

HYPOTHESIS
 H0: null hypotheses
 H1 : there will be significant with association between pre-test level of anxiety
among hospitalized children in experimental and control group their selected
socio-demographic variables.

 ORGANIZATION OF FINDINGS
 The data were presented under following section:
 SECTION – I
 Distribution of study subjects according to sociodemographic variables using frequency and
percentage.
 SECTION – II
 Analysis of post-test and post-test knowledge score of level of anxiety among hospitalized
children in experimental and control group by using frequency, percentage, mean, mean
percentage and SD.

 SECTION – III
 Analysis of effectiveness of origami crafts by using “t” of test anxiety reduction.
 SECTION – IV
 Analysis of compare the pre and post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
Experimental group

 Analysis of compare the post-test level of anxiety among hospitalized children in
 SECTION – V
 Chi-square analysis to find out association between the pretest knowledge score with
their socio-demographic.
SECTION – A
 The finding of the study has been discussed with reference to objectives and
hypothesis with finding of other studies.
 In the present study socio-demographic detail of 60 subject were done using percentage
analysis, in related to age Table1: Depicts that out of experimental group 30
participated in the present study, n=18 (60%) belonged to the age group below 6-8
years, n=12 (40%) in 9-10 years. Control group 30 participated in the present study,
n=16 (53.33%) belonged to the age group below 6-8 years, n=14 (46.66%) in 9-10
years.

 Table 2(fig. 3.2) out of experimental group 30 subjects involved in the current study,
n=20 (66.66%) were males and n=10 (33.33%) were females and control group 30
subjects involved in the current study, n=13 (43.33%) were females and n=17 (56.66%)
were males.
 Table 3 (fig 3.3) the experimental group belong that is 16.66% who had participated in
the study were first child, 26.66% were third child, 50% participate were second child and
only 6.66% had fourth birth order of child. And the control group belong that is 26.66%
who had participated in the first child, 20% were third, 40% participate in the study were
second and only 13.33% had fourth birth order of the child.
 Table 4 (fig 3.4) the experimental group belong that is 50% who had participated in the
belong were nuclear family, 40% were joint family, 3.33% participate in the belong to
extended family, 6.67 participate in the belong to separated family and the control group
belong that is 46.66% who had participated in the belong were nuclear family, 43.33%
were joint family, 6.66% participate in the belong to extended family and 3.33%
participate in the belong were separated.

 Table 5 (fig 3.5) the experimental group belong that is 33.33% who had participated
in the study were income below 5000/-, 20% were 5001-10000/-, 16.66% participate
in the study were income 10001-15000 and 15001-20000, only 13.33% had income
above 20001/-. And the control group belong that is 36.33% who had participated in
the study were income below 5000/-, 16.66% were 5001-10000/-, 13.33% participate
in the study were income 10001-15000 and 23.33% participant income 15001-
20000, only 6.66% had income above 20001/-.
 Table 6 (fig3.6) the experimental group belong that is 6.66% who had participated
in the were one number of siblings, 53.33% were two, 40% participate in the more
than two number of siblings and the control group belong that is 20% who had
participated in the were one number of siblings, 46.66% were two, 33.33%
participate in the more than two number of siblings

 Table 7 (fig3.7) the experimental group belong that is 50% who had participated in
the study were area of residence urban and rural area and the control group belong
that is 53.33% who had participated in the study were rural area, 46.66% were urban
area.
 Table 8 (fig3.8) Elicits that majority of the participate 53.33% were Hindu, 16.66%
were Muslim, 20% were Christian and 10 were other. And control group majority of
the participate 46.66% were Hindu, 20% were Muslim, 16.66% were Christian and
other

SECTION -B
1. The first objective assesses the pre-test and post-test level of anxiety among
hospitalized children in experimental and control group.
 Table9 (Figure3.9):Depicts that among 30 subjects of experimental group in
pretest 10 (33.33%) mild level of anxiety, 09 (30%) are having moderate,
11(36.66%) have a severe level of anxiety and post-test 18 (60%) mild level of
anxiety, 07 (23.33%) are having moderate, 05(16.66%) have a severe level of
anxiety Table 10 (Figure3.10):Depicts that among 30 subjects of control group in
pretest 07 (23.33%) mild level of anxiety, 08 (26.66%) are having moderate, 15
(50%) have a severe level of anxiety and post-test 17 (56.66%) mild level of
anxiety, 07 (23.33%) are having moderate, 06(20%) have a severe level of anxiety

SECTION – C
 The second objective was to find out to effectiveness of Origami in reducing anxiety
level of hospitalized children in experimental group.
 Table 11, and fig no3.11 Revealed that increase the knowledge as calculated “t’ value is
18.06 greater than table value 2.66 at p<0.001 level of confidence. So, the H1 hypothesis
(There will be significant difference between in pre and post test score regarding
regarding anxiety reduction.) is accepted.
 SECTION - D
 The Third objective was found out the compare the pre and post-test level of anxiety
among hospitalized children in control group.
 Table 12, and fig no3.12 Revealed that reduce the anxiety level as calculated “t’ value is
11.62 greater than table value 2.66 at p<0.001 level of confidence. Table 13, and fig no3.13
Revealed that reduce the anxiety level in control group as calculated “t’ value is 14.06 greater
than table value 2.66 at p<0.001 level of confidence.

 SECTION – E
 The four objective was found out the compare the pre and post-test level of
anxiety among hospitalized children in Experimental group.
 13, and fig no3.13 Revealed that reduce the anxiety level in control group as
calculated “t’ value is 14.06 greater than table value 2.66 at p<0.001 level of
confidence.
 SECTION – F
 The fifth objective was found out the association between pre-test level of
anxiety among hospitalized children in experimental and control group with
selected demographic variables.

 Table 14 shows that there is significant association While the chi - square value of
gender, family type, number of siblings, area of residence 13.48, 14.24, 18.67,
`respectively which is more than tabulated value 12.59, 9.49,5.99 at the degree of
freedom 6,4,2 So H1 hypothesis is accepted with regards to knowledge. Hence there
is no significant while the chi- square value of age in year, birth order of child,
religion, 2.78 and 7.21 and 7.45 an association between above stated socio demographic
variables with pretest knowledge regarding anxiety reduction among child So H2
hypothesis is rejected with regards to knowledge.

SUMMARY
 The chapter deal with discussion of finding of the study. It includes discussion of the
finding under different section such as distribution of subject according to
sociodemographic variables, association between child in hospital and
sociodemographic variables.

ANALYSIS AND Interpretationvivibbboboo.pptx

ANALYSIS AND Interpretationvivibbboboo.pptx

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to ANALYSIS AND Interpretationvivibbboboo.pptx

Similar to ANALYSIS AND Interpretationvivibbboboo.pptx (20)

More from FaizanAhmad697379

More from FaizanAhmad697379 (7)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ANALYSIS AND Interpretationvivibbboboo.pptx