The document compares the Mexican Amparo law and the U.S. judicial system. Some key differences are: - In Mexico, one is considered guilty until proven innocent, while the U.S. uses the innocent until proven guilty standard. - Trials are by a single judge in Mexico but by a jury of peers in the U.S. - The Amparo acts like habeas corpus by allowing a judge to prevent abusive arrest, taking the individual under their care until the case is resolved. - A recent case involved the arrest of Duane Dog Chapman by U.S. Marshals at Mexico's request for jumping bail in Mexico. This case highlights the incompatibility between the two legal systems.