The 21 Biggest Lies About Donald Trump and You!Theotis Davis
In "The 21 Biggest Lies About Donald Trump (And You!)", author Kurt Schlichter refutes the falsehoods aimed at the scores of millions of Americans who proudly support President Trump. Donald Trump has a bond with his supporters that his unique in recent presidential history.
This Unclassified Slide Deck provides an overview of the concept of Reflexive Control Doctrine as it is used as a national strategy by the Russian Federation. It describes exactly how and what was done to "influence" the election differentiating the from the notion of actual "collusion." Disinformation, misinformation, fake news as a campaign strategy is vastly different from actually affecting an outcome by active measures such as bribery, blackmail or hacking.
The 21 Biggest Lies About Donald Trump and You!Theotis Davis
In "The 21 Biggest Lies About Donald Trump (And You!)", author Kurt Schlichter refutes the falsehoods aimed at the scores of millions of Americans who proudly support President Trump. Donald Trump has a bond with his supporters that his unique in recent presidential history.
This Unclassified Slide Deck provides an overview of the concept of Reflexive Control Doctrine as it is used as a national strategy by the Russian Federation. It describes exactly how and what was done to "influence" the election differentiating the from the notion of actual "collusion." Disinformation, misinformation, fake news as a campaign strategy is vastly different from actually affecting an outcome by active measures such as bribery, blackmail or hacking.
Death by Negligence
The Gorakhpur tragedy is a shocking reminder of how serious is the rot in the public healthcare system. Our Special Report on medical negligence looks at what led to the deaths of over 100 babies and the urgent need for stricter laws
What are the opinions of public about trump?OlegGarah
The quantity of Americans who say they hold positive perspectives of President Donald Trump has dropped to its most minimal point since his initiation, as indicated by opinion news. https://eatprayvote.org/
Donald j. Trump a President like no other by Conrad BlackTheotis Davis
Conrad Black, bestselling author of Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom and Richard M. Nixon: A Life in Full, turns his attention to his "friend" President Donald J. Trump and provides the most intriguing and significant analysis yet of Trump's political rise. Ambitious in intellectual scope, contrarian in many of its opinions, and admirably concise, this is surely set to be one of the most provocative political books you are likely to read this year
The fifth edition of the PEORIA Project, "The Year in Echoes" looks back at the year in political conversations and seeks to find the winners and losers in the battle to get campaign messages heard and echoed by the general public. This report includes all social and mainstream media conversations of the 2016 election from March 15, 2015 to January 17, 2016.
Derek Floyd's Death - What Happened. Free Book The Free School
https://journalistethics.com/george-floyd/
Free book available at this link
This book is about what this author neutrally terms the
‘George Floyd event’. A tragedy. It contains three parts
beyond this page that celebrates George’s life and legacy.
The next segment, Red Flags, analyzes thematic issues that
arouse suspicion concerning official narratives.
Part Three examines critical matters that surrounds the two
main eyewitness types on the ground – Emergency Services
Personnel and members of the public.
Part Four lists the six types of evidence that may arouse
researchers. The concluding case study explores how the
television smash hit series Roseanne provides a lens to
comprehend the connection between MK Ultra fake news
and irrational social problems that persist in America.
This book minimizes showing photo images of George and
discussing facts about his private life. Mr Floyd never made
it to trial. George is innocent of all accusations re May 25th.
He is not the person facing trial for a senseless murder.
george perry floyd jr, george floyd, tou thao, thomas lane, alexander kueng, minnesota, Minneapolis, police, arrest, choke, neck, murder, manslaughter, second degree murder, black, white, race, racism, riots, civil liberties, FBI, president donald trump, black lives matter, derek chauvin, derek michael chauvin, darnelle frazier, 17, seventeen, coroner, medical report, corona virus, Ben crump law
A Tale of Two Kyles: How Ad Data Exposed My ID TheftKyle J. Britt
In 2010 my identity was stolen. I first realized it thanks to a targeted ad. But ever since then, my identity is tangled up with another real Kyle Britt. You wouldn’t believe how hard that is to fix.
"The Talk About Trump" covers the ways in which boisterous businessman Donald Trump has impacted the presidential race in traditional and social media. Not only has he turned up the volume; he's also managed to change the topic of conversation.
From a field of 16 Republicans, Donald has come out on top. And from a field of 5 Democrats, Hillary has risen to the front of the pack. Their presentation and public speaking styles, a stark contrast. Many of their political views, too. But the power of an engaging and accessible speech remains the same across both parties and both potential 2016 presidential candidates.
Ranking presidents is often a popularity or name recognition contest. Let us instead rank presidents by how many lived or died because of them. This makes the worst presidents Nixon, Reagan, and Jackson, and the best presidents Lincoln, Van Buren, Carter, and Grant. Some both saved many lives and caused many deaths, like Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and Obama.
Closer scrutiny of data from the social network Twitter would have helped to diagnose and predict the rise of the two outsider candidates in the 2016 presidential election, businessman Donald Trump and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, according to a new Public Echoes Of Rhetoric In America (PEORIA) Project report.
UNPRESIDENTED: A World View of the US Election 2016Rosalind Warner
The US presidential election results will have an impact worldwide for years to come. In this talk, Dr. Rosalind Warner will look beyond the personalities and ‘fake news’ to explore the deeper social, political and economic origins of the 2016 election result. Participants will discover what made 2016 different and why it matters to the world what happens next.
Presumptive Democratic and Republican presidential nominees Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have not yet staked a claim to the online supporters of their felled opponents according to a new Public Echoes Of Rhetoric In America (PEORIA) Project report.
A Donald trmup presentation for pepole who want that for free for exemple. I think it was the best presentation for school. Hello, welcome to my channel dddddddddddddddddddddddddd ,,oqskdoqkfoksOKFOkdpofksPOFKoqkfSDFKPOSdofkDOKFPSODKFSOKDFPSKPodvjnjnsdfsddopsndfjsnqidfjnqsfnqsdjnfisdqnjfiqjnsdifnqsndfjnqsidnfisnfiqnsdfiqndsfinqsidfqsindfqsdifnqsdfnsqdnfsdjqfdsfndnfnfdsqfnqsnfsdjfnsnfdqpdfnqjidfqsjfnqiqfsdnfiqsfncfdqfnqdfqsdfnsfiezaOFNQSDFQNSPFIQSNDNFeosifdoIDSDFOidfoqsijdfofiJDJFOOOOIFJSOQIQofidjsfjspofkspl.... qidfjOKFISDpo...fdspGPOSKFKSkfposdkgosdgkokgfskIZPORP°O°PFkfpo0°23Kf,sffqFOKPSDJFSPFOSKFSDOFKSDPFOSDKPFSFSDFJSDFFOJDFFJSPOqsposskpsodkpqsokqisfqsjfqoijgoqsdjfjqosfjpsojfoisdjpfsokdfpsdfJSPFOJpfsdjfpsdofoijpsdopodfjpsofdsfpsofsdjfisjpodsdgosdodkspjcsijgpKDSQOGOQIJGPOIDFGefgjpOJPGOJDPSOGJSDPOpjejPJFPOjdspjfspjdpJJFPjpJPJPSJDPFJSPOJPDSFSOfpogjpsdjposjpgjspdjJPDJPGJPJpjpdojspfospfoksdpfokspdofifjopdjqoidjfdqsjdfjiqdjfqiodjfoqjifjqiodfjqdfiqfjqfdijfqjfqoifioqjioqfjioqjoqjofqfjdjdosqjodsqiofijsdijfsjfjoqjsdfqdfojioejfgqsdkkfpjgs^gsidjjisdudgiuhsdoidgsjqudgjqidfçdi
It's also ironic considering this is a Republican National Committeesponsored debate,
an RNC Trump has stacked with loyalists. Instead, as he's done before, Trump will be
counterprogramming this Fox News debate, appearing instead in an interview that is
set to air at the same time as the debate with Tucker Carlson, the form
Death by Negligence
The Gorakhpur tragedy is a shocking reminder of how serious is the rot in the public healthcare system. Our Special Report on medical negligence looks at what led to the deaths of over 100 babies and the urgent need for stricter laws
What are the opinions of public about trump?OlegGarah
The quantity of Americans who say they hold positive perspectives of President Donald Trump has dropped to its most minimal point since his initiation, as indicated by opinion news. https://eatprayvote.org/
Donald j. Trump a President like no other by Conrad BlackTheotis Davis
Conrad Black, bestselling author of Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Champion of Freedom and Richard M. Nixon: A Life in Full, turns his attention to his "friend" President Donald J. Trump and provides the most intriguing and significant analysis yet of Trump's political rise. Ambitious in intellectual scope, contrarian in many of its opinions, and admirably concise, this is surely set to be one of the most provocative political books you are likely to read this year
The fifth edition of the PEORIA Project, "The Year in Echoes" looks back at the year in political conversations and seeks to find the winners and losers in the battle to get campaign messages heard and echoed by the general public. This report includes all social and mainstream media conversations of the 2016 election from March 15, 2015 to January 17, 2016.
Derek Floyd's Death - What Happened. Free Book The Free School
https://journalistethics.com/george-floyd/
Free book available at this link
This book is about what this author neutrally terms the
‘George Floyd event’. A tragedy. It contains three parts
beyond this page that celebrates George’s life and legacy.
The next segment, Red Flags, analyzes thematic issues that
arouse suspicion concerning official narratives.
Part Three examines critical matters that surrounds the two
main eyewitness types on the ground – Emergency Services
Personnel and members of the public.
Part Four lists the six types of evidence that may arouse
researchers. The concluding case study explores how the
television smash hit series Roseanne provides a lens to
comprehend the connection between MK Ultra fake news
and irrational social problems that persist in America.
This book minimizes showing photo images of George and
discussing facts about his private life. Mr Floyd never made
it to trial. George is innocent of all accusations re May 25th.
He is not the person facing trial for a senseless murder.
george perry floyd jr, george floyd, tou thao, thomas lane, alexander kueng, minnesota, Minneapolis, police, arrest, choke, neck, murder, manslaughter, second degree murder, black, white, race, racism, riots, civil liberties, FBI, president donald trump, black lives matter, derek chauvin, derek michael chauvin, darnelle frazier, 17, seventeen, coroner, medical report, corona virus, Ben crump law
A Tale of Two Kyles: How Ad Data Exposed My ID TheftKyle J. Britt
In 2010 my identity was stolen. I first realized it thanks to a targeted ad. But ever since then, my identity is tangled up with another real Kyle Britt. You wouldn’t believe how hard that is to fix.
"The Talk About Trump" covers the ways in which boisterous businessman Donald Trump has impacted the presidential race in traditional and social media. Not only has he turned up the volume; he's also managed to change the topic of conversation.
From a field of 16 Republicans, Donald has come out on top. And from a field of 5 Democrats, Hillary has risen to the front of the pack. Their presentation and public speaking styles, a stark contrast. Many of their political views, too. But the power of an engaging and accessible speech remains the same across both parties and both potential 2016 presidential candidates.
Ranking presidents is often a popularity or name recognition contest. Let us instead rank presidents by how many lived or died because of them. This makes the worst presidents Nixon, Reagan, and Jackson, and the best presidents Lincoln, Van Buren, Carter, and Grant. Some both saved many lives and caused many deaths, like Franklin Roosevelt, Lyndon Johnson, and Obama.
Closer scrutiny of data from the social network Twitter would have helped to diagnose and predict the rise of the two outsider candidates in the 2016 presidential election, businessman Donald Trump and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, according to a new Public Echoes Of Rhetoric In America (PEORIA) Project report.
UNPRESIDENTED: A World View of the US Election 2016Rosalind Warner
The US presidential election results will have an impact worldwide for years to come. In this talk, Dr. Rosalind Warner will look beyond the personalities and ‘fake news’ to explore the deeper social, political and economic origins of the 2016 election result. Participants will discover what made 2016 different and why it matters to the world what happens next.
Presumptive Democratic and Republican presidential nominees Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have not yet staked a claim to the online supporters of their felled opponents according to a new Public Echoes Of Rhetoric In America (PEORIA) Project report.
A Donald trmup presentation for pepole who want that for free for exemple. I think it was the best presentation for school. Hello, welcome to my channel dddddddddddddddddddddddddd ,,oqskdoqkfoksOKFOkdpofksPOFKoqkfSDFKPOSdofkDOKFPSODKFSOKDFPSKPodvjnjnsdfsddopsndfjsnqidfjnqsfnqsdjnfisdqnjfiqjnsdifnqsndfjnqsidnfisnfiqnsdfiqndsfinqsidfqsindfqsdifnqsdfnsqdnfsdjqfdsfndnfnfdsqfnqsnfsdjfnsnfdqpdfnqjidfqsjfnqiqfsdnfiqsfncfdqfnqdfqsdfnsfiezaOFNQSDFQNSPFIQSNDNFeosifdoIDSDFOidfoqsijdfofiJDJFOOOOIFJSOQIQofidjsfjspofkspl.... qidfjOKFISDpo...fdspGPOSKFKSkfposdkgosdgkokgfskIZPORP°O°PFkfpo0°23Kf,sffqFOKPSDJFSPFOSKFSDOFKSDPFOSDKPFSFSDFJSDFFOJDFFJSPOqsposskpsodkpqsokqisfqsjfqoijgoqsdjfjqosfjpsojfoisdjpfsokdfpsdfJSPFOJpfsdjfpsdofoijpsdopodfjpsofdsfpsofsdjfisjpodsdgosdodkspjcsijgpKDSQOGOQIJGPOIDFGefgjpOJPGOJDPSOGJSDPOpjejPJFPOjdspjfspjdpJJFPjpJPJPSJDPFJSPOJPDSFSOfpogjpsdjposjpgjspdjJPDJPGJPJpjpdojspfospfoksdpfokspdofifjopdjqoidjfdqsjdfjiqdjfqiodjfoqjifjqiodfjqdfiqfjqfdijfqjfqoifioqjioqfjioqjoqjofqfjdjdosqjodsqiofijsdijfsjfjoqjsdfqdfojioejfgqsdkkfpjgs^gsidjjisdudgiuhsdoidgsjqudgjqidfçdi
It's also ironic considering this is a Republican National Committeesponsored debate,
an RNC Trump has stacked with loyalists. Instead, as he's done before, Trump will be
counterprogramming this Fox News debate, appearing instead in an interview that is
set to air at the same time as the debate with Tucker Carlson, the form
My classmates and I review the positive, negative, and neutral ways Hillary Clinton was portrayed around the midterm elections. Great info for campaign professionals.
An abecedarian essay follows the alphabet with each section while being tied together by a single topic. In this case, I discussed the 2016 US presidential election and the narrative I experienced as a Washington resident.
Our two main political parties are at a crossroads. Can a consumer marketing lens reveal a way forward?
By Stacy Baas and Samantha Cabaluna
Full text of the report available at https://www.baasstrategy.com/blog/making-sense-of-the-moment-b4tsw
1. American Politics: Why the Thrill Is Gone
The language of politics stays the same, and it is a dead
language. Credit Photograph by Danny Wilcox Frazier/Redux
Earlier this month, the Upshot--the Times's "politics and policy vertical," as it's known in the
business--ran a lengthy analysis of the Presidential campaign on the Republican side. The piece
came up with three categories of candidates: Invisible Primary Leaders, those early favorites who
lock up the party regulars and the money ahead of the first vote (Al Gore and George W. Bush, in
2000; Mitt Romney, in 2012; Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton, in 2016); Mainstream Alternatives, who
are broadly popular enough to be viable nominees (John McCain, in 2000; Barack Obama, in 2008;
Scott Walker and Marco Rubio, in 2016); and Factional Favorites, those candidates with a strong
following in one section of the party (Howard Dean, in 2004; Rick Santorum, in 2012; Ted Cruz and
Rand Paul, in 2016).
It was an original and useful guide to the race, helping make sense of the state of play nine months
before the Iowa caucuses and a year and a half out from the election. The Upshot's upshot was that,
amid the forest of names on the Republican side, "two figures--Jeb Bush and Scott Walker--have
quickly moved to the head of the pack. Perhaps only Mr. Rubio has a good chance to join them at the
top." The reasons have to do with fundraising, positioning, élite support, broad acceptability--that is,
with the roles spelled out in the piece. The author, Nate Cohn, concluded, "It will be fun to watch."
That was when he lost me.
It might not be wise for a sometime political journalist to admit this, but the 2016 campaign doesn't
seem like fun to me. Watching Marco Rubio try to overcome his past support for immigration reform
to win enough conservative votes to become the Mainstream Alternative to the Invisible Primary
Leader--who, if there is one, will be a candidate named Bush--doesn't seem like fun. Nor does
analyzing whether Chris Christie can become something more than the Factional Favorite of
moderate Republicans, or whether Ted Cruz's impressive early fundraising will make him that rare
thing, a Factional Favorite with an outside chance to win. If this is any kind of fun, it's the kind of
fun I associate with reading about seventeenth-century French execution methods, or watching a
YouTube video of a fight between a python and an alligator. Fun in small doses, as long as you're not
too close.
American politics in general doesn't seem like fun these days. There's nothing very entertaining
about super PACs, or Mike Huckabee's national announcement of an imminent national
announcement of whether he will run for President again. Jeb Bush's ruthless approach to locking up
the exclusive services of longstanding Republican political consultants and media professionals far
ahead of the primaries doesn't quicken my pulse. Scott Walker's refusal to affirm Barack Obama's
patriotism doesn't shock me into a state of alert indignation. A forthcoming book with revelations
about the Clintons' use of their offices and influence to raise money for their foundation and grow
rich from paid speeches neither surprises me nor gladdens my heart.
2. Since I was eight years old, and the Republican candidates were named Nixon, Rockefeller, and
Reagan, and the Democrats were Humphrey, Kennedy, and McCarthy, I've been passionate about
American politics, as a student, a witness, and a partisan. Politics was in my blood, at the family
dinner table, in my work and my free time. But at some point in the past few years it went dead for
me, or I for it. Perhaps it was week thirty-eight of the Obama-Romney race (a campaign between
"Forward" and "Believe in America"), or the routinization of the filibuster, or the name Priorities
USA Action, or the fifty-eighth vote in Congress to repeal the Affordable Care Act--something
happened that made it very hard to continue paying attention. I don't take this as a sign of personal
superiority: I've always disliked people who considered themselves to be "above" politics. I mourn
my lack of political passion as I would if I were to lose interest in reading fiction, or to stop caring
about someone who'd been important to me for most of my life. And I count on getting back the
feeling--the intense mix of love, hatred, anxiety, astonishment, and gratification--because life, public
life, is impoverished without it. Perhaps it will return sometime before November 8, 2016. But for
now--I have to be honest--it's gone.
The reason is the stuckness of American politics. Especially in the years after 2008, the worst
tendencies of American politics only hardened, while remaining in the same place. Beneath the
surface froth and churn, we are paralyzed. You can sense it as soon as you step out of the train at
Union Station in Washington, the instant you click on a Politico article about a candidates' forum in
Iowa: miasma settles over your central nervous system and you start to go numb. What has
happened is that the same things keep happening. The tidal wave of money keeps happening, the
trivialization of coverage keeps happening, the search engine extremism of the Republican Party
keeps happening (Ted Cruz: abolish the I.R.S.; Rand Paul: the Common Core is "un-American"). The
issues remain huge and urgent: inequality, global warming, immigration, poorly educated children,
American decline, radical Islamism. But the language of politics stays the same, and it is a dead
language. The notion that answers will come from Washington or the campaign trail is beyond far-
fetched.
It's easy to denounce the political class, but in a democracy the public generally deserves the leaders
it gets. The populist surges of the past few years--the Tea Party on the right, Occupy Wall Street on
the left--have been no more convincing than the ideas of élites, though energy from below is in itself
an encouraging thing. I've always rejected the politics of anti-politics, whether it came from Jerry
Brown, Ross Perot, or http://www.nytimes.com/pages/sports/index.html Ronald Reagan. So it would
be churlish not to end with a short wish list for the 2016 campaign.
1. A Democrat--Elizabeth Warren, Sherrod Brown, Deval Patrick--should give Hillary Clinton a
serious, sustained challenge, for her and the party's sake if nothing else. With competition, she'd be
a better candidate; without, the yearlong vacuum will be filled with investigations, inconsequential
gaffes, hyper-carefulness, and crushing boredom.
2. A Republican should run against the Republican Congress. Its negativism has become a disgrace
to the party and the country. Such a campaign would have obvious enemies, but it would also tell
voters that at least one candidate is willing to put country ahead of party.
3. Some candidate should unilaterally disarm, refuse super PAC money, and call out the corruption
3. of all the others. That would mean losing, of course--but, hell, almost all of them are going to lose
anyway.
4. Some big-money donors should do the equivalent. Regardless of the disclosure requirements, they
should name the recipient of every dollar they give, and shame others for not doing the same.
5. Clinton should give the boldest speech of her career, on inequality. In it, she should criticize the
policies of financial deregulation that took off during her husband's Presidency, acknowledging that
that is their provenance and connecting them to the deep unfairness of our economy.
6. A Republican and a Democrat with national reputations should hold hands and break the partisan
rules. They should announce early on the intention of making the other his or her running mate in
the event of winning the nomination--if only to test whether the political center is really as dead as it
seems.
7. Political reporters should embrace the value of objective truth, and adopt a policy of never
repeating a party or a candidate's dubious or false statement without exposing it in the next
sentence.
8. Policies and their consequences should be the main story, tactics the footnote. Coverage of a
candidate's positioning on this or that issue should include a reminder of the context:
notwithstanding No. 6 above, the differences between the two parties are clear, stark, and uniform
across almost all issues.
None of it is likely to happen. Any of it would make American politics more relevant, more
interesting--maybe even more fun.