AMERICAN ICON:
ALAN MULALLY AND THE FIGHT TO SAVE FORD MOTOR COMPANY
KEVIN O’BRIEN, PMP
BACKGROUND
• Company started in 1903
• First major auto company, controlled 61% of market in 1921
• Hurt by Great Depression like many other companies
• Ralph Nader brings in Government regulation
• Japanese imports create competition in 1970s
• Ford rebounds in 1980s
• In 1990s, Ford sells more trucks than cars, and lots of SUVs
BILL FORD
• Henry’s great-grandson
• Installed because Ford family has Class B shares that guarantee control.
• He was only 41 when he became Chairman in 1999
• So the Board split off CEO duties and brought in Jacques Nasser
JACQUES NASSER
• Internal candidate
• Reputation for cost-cutting
• Worried that only a few products produced most of the profits
• Went on a diversification buying spree
• Authoritarian
MISTAKES
• Morale starts to suffer
• Quality goes down
• Ford Explorers start to roll over, kill people in 2000
• Dealers and suppliers fighting back
• 2001 loss of $5.45 B, credit rating downgraded
• In October 2001 Nasser is ousted, and Bill Ford becomes CEO in addition to
remaining chairman
STARTING RECOVERY
• Costs cut, 5 factories closed
• Renewed focus on quality and engineering
• Back in the black in 2002
STILL PROBLEMS
• Weak executive team
• Infighting among executives
• Subordinates would say yes, then do what they wanted
• Ford not strong enough to discipline them
• A new CEO is needed
THE SEARCH
• Carlos Ghosn – the “Rock Star” – wants to be Chairman and CEO
• Dieter Zetsche
• Wolfgang Bernhard
• Meanwhile Ford sales are down in 2002,2003,2004, and losing market share
• Only profitable because of Ford Credit
THE ROT CONTINUES
• Still a weak executive team
• Bill Ford getting snow jobs from subordinates
• By 2005 Ford credit rating was “junk bond”
• Bill Ford knows they are starting to circle the drain
• Brings in Mark Fields to run North America
• His “The Way Forward” plan relies on more cuts, announced in early 2006
A NEW CEO IS NEEDED
• By 2006, Ford now trailed Toyota in US Market
• Stock had fallen more than 50% in 5 years
• Ford makes one more attempt at signing Ghosn
• Then they turn to Alan Mulally
WHY MULALLY?
• At Boeing had successfully faced strong foreign competition from Airbus
• Had transformed a similarly divisive culture at Boeing into one of collaboration
• Made Boeing leaner and more profitable in the face of a difficult environment
post 9/11
• And he got a lot of his ideas from Ford Motor Company
CHALLENGES
• Mulally not a “car guy”
• Viewed as a threat by many Ford executives
• Dismissed by his competitors
• The way things have always been done doesn’t work so do things differently
HOW TO CHANGE?
• Cut back on meetings
• Institute Business Plan Review (BPR)
• Demands transparency and facts as the basis for making decisions
• Start listening to employees
• Eat in cafeteria
• Pop in to offices
• Stop people in hallway to converse
BETTER PRODUCTS
• Simplify product line
• Check out competition
• Make executives drive competitor vehicles, particularly Japanese
• No more “Taurus” decisions
STREAMLINE MANAGEMENT PROCESS
• Executives to personally report
• Assistants could watch, but keep their mouths shut
RULES
• People first
• Everyone is included
• Compelling vision
• Clear performance goals
• One plan
• Facts and data
• Propose a plan, “find-a-way” attitude
• Respect, listen, help, and appreciate
each other
• Emotional resilience…trust the
process
• Have fun…enjoy the journey and
each other
THE BPR PROCESS
• Standardized reporting on agreed data
• Still essential part of how Ford operates
• Happens at various levels
• Employees invited to be observers
EXECUTIVE CHANGES
• Many executives not competent in their roles
• Frequently the ones that are competent are the first to leave
• Many threatened by Mulally’s changes
EVERYTHING GREEN?
• Each week all statuses were good in BPR
• Yet Ford was losing money?
• Reporting honestly was seen as acknowledging personal failure
• Finally, Mark Fields delays launch of Edge, and reports it as Red in BPR
• It takes a few more BPRs before other execs start acknowledging the problems
they have
MODELS OF HOW TO DO IT
• Toyota
• Making products people want, with less resources and in faster time
• Continual improvement
• High quality
• Opposite of Ford
• Mazda – then a Ford subsidiary, used similar process to Toyota
• Ford’s past – Ford got to be the first big auto company by doing a lot of things
right, but had gotten away from it
SIMPLIFY!
• Too many products
• 97 different vehicles being produced
• Bad reporting structure for executives
• Implement Matrix structure
• More people reporting directly to Mulally improves his information
THE PLAN
• Aggressively restructure to operate profitably at the current demand and
changing model mix
• Accelerate development of new products our customers want and value
• Finance our plan and improve our balance sheet
• Work together effectively as one team
CASH IS THE KEY
• Secure line of credit from Wall Street
• Credit conditions already starting to tighten in 2006
• Secured up to $23B
• Had to mortgage nearly every asset, including the blue oval logo
• This is why Ford did not need a Federal bailout
FOCUS ON CORE BUSINESS
• Selling off
• Mazda
• Aston-Martin
• Jaguar
• Volvo
• Land Rover
• Closing
• Mercury – right now you will get in trouble if you park a Mercury in the Ford-only lot
BACK TO 2 BRANDS
• Ford
• Lincoln
UNION NEGOTIATIONS
• Ford losing money on every car built in North America
• Insurance was a major expense
• $23B retiree health care liability on Ford’s books
• Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) negotiated to transfer this to
UAW
• In return. Ford committed to build the Focus in US instead of Mexico
2008 – THE CRASH
• Ford announces that it will not be profitable in 2009 either, despite earlier
projections
• But will not stop investing in new vehicles
• JD power says Ford only full-line automotive company to show consistent quality
improvement
• Operating costs cut by $5B in 2008
• And because Ford started sooner, it was in better shape than GM or Chrysler
TURNING DOWN THE BAILOUT
• Ford had a cash cushion now
• The UAW wanted them to succeed
• So in late 2008 Ford refused to take a bailout
FORD SUCCEEDS
• By the end of 2009 Ford did actually show a profit for the year, and has been
profitable since then
• Toyota hit a purported quality problem in 2009 involving acceleration that would
not stop
• In 2010 Ford began paying back borrowing and rebuilding its balance sheet
• New cars like the Focus and Explorer were a success
• Alan Mulally steps down in July 2014, and is succeeded by Mark Fields

American icon pmi

  • 1.
    AMERICAN ICON: ALAN MULALLYAND THE FIGHT TO SAVE FORD MOTOR COMPANY KEVIN O’BRIEN, PMP
  • 2.
    BACKGROUND • Company startedin 1903 • First major auto company, controlled 61% of market in 1921 • Hurt by Great Depression like many other companies • Ralph Nader brings in Government regulation • Japanese imports create competition in 1970s • Ford rebounds in 1980s • In 1990s, Ford sells more trucks than cars, and lots of SUVs
  • 3.
    BILL FORD • Henry’sgreat-grandson • Installed because Ford family has Class B shares that guarantee control. • He was only 41 when he became Chairman in 1999 • So the Board split off CEO duties and brought in Jacques Nasser
  • 4.
    JACQUES NASSER • Internalcandidate • Reputation for cost-cutting • Worried that only a few products produced most of the profits • Went on a diversification buying spree • Authoritarian
  • 5.
    MISTAKES • Morale startsto suffer • Quality goes down • Ford Explorers start to roll over, kill people in 2000 • Dealers and suppliers fighting back • 2001 loss of $5.45 B, credit rating downgraded • In October 2001 Nasser is ousted, and Bill Ford becomes CEO in addition to remaining chairman
  • 6.
    STARTING RECOVERY • Costscut, 5 factories closed • Renewed focus on quality and engineering • Back in the black in 2002
  • 7.
    STILL PROBLEMS • Weakexecutive team • Infighting among executives • Subordinates would say yes, then do what they wanted • Ford not strong enough to discipline them • A new CEO is needed
  • 8.
    THE SEARCH • CarlosGhosn – the “Rock Star” – wants to be Chairman and CEO • Dieter Zetsche • Wolfgang Bernhard • Meanwhile Ford sales are down in 2002,2003,2004, and losing market share • Only profitable because of Ford Credit
  • 9.
    THE ROT CONTINUES •Still a weak executive team • Bill Ford getting snow jobs from subordinates • By 2005 Ford credit rating was “junk bond” • Bill Ford knows they are starting to circle the drain • Brings in Mark Fields to run North America • His “The Way Forward” plan relies on more cuts, announced in early 2006
  • 10.
    A NEW CEOIS NEEDED • By 2006, Ford now trailed Toyota in US Market • Stock had fallen more than 50% in 5 years • Ford makes one more attempt at signing Ghosn • Then they turn to Alan Mulally
  • 11.
    WHY MULALLY? • AtBoeing had successfully faced strong foreign competition from Airbus • Had transformed a similarly divisive culture at Boeing into one of collaboration • Made Boeing leaner and more profitable in the face of a difficult environment post 9/11 • And he got a lot of his ideas from Ford Motor Company
  • 12.
    CHALLENGES • Mulally nota “car guy” • Viewed as a threat by many Ford executives • Dismissed by his competitors • The way things have always been done doesn’t work so do things differently
  • 13.
    HOW TO CHANGE? •Cut back on meetings • Institute Business Plan Review (BPR) • Demands transparency and facts as the basis for making decisions • Start listening to employees • Eat in cafeteria • Pop in to offices • Stop people in hallway to converse
  • 14.
    BETTER PRODUCTS • Simplifyproduct line • Check out competition • Make executives drive competitor vehicles, particularly Japanese • No more “Taurus” decisions
  • 15.
    STREAMLINE MANAGEMENT PROCESS •Executives to personally report • Assistants could watch, but keep their mouths shut
  • 16.
    RULES • People first •Everyone is included • Compelling vision • Clear performance goals • One plan • Facts and data • Propose a plan, “find-a-way” attitude • Respect, listen, help, and appreciate each other • Emotional resilience…trust the process • Have fun…enjoy the journey and each other
  • 17.
    THE BPR PROCESS •Standardized reporting on agreed data • Still essential part of how Ford operates • Happens at various levels • Employees invited to be observers
  • 18.
    EXECUTIVE CHANGES • Manyexecutives not competent in their roles • Frequently the ones that are competent are the first to leave • Many threatened by Mulally’s changes
  • 19.
    EVERYTHING GREEN? • Eachweek all statuses were good in BPR • Yet Ford was losing money? • Reporting honestly was seen as acknowledging personal failure • Finally, Mark Fields delays launch of Edge, and reports it as Red in BPR • It takes a few more BPRs before other execs start acknowledging the problems they have
  • 20.
    MODELS OF HOWTO DO IT • Toyota • Making products people want, with less resources and in faster time • Continual improvement • High quality • Opposite of Ford • Mazda – then a Ford subsidiary, used similar process to Toyota • Ford’s past – Ford got to be the first big auto company by doing a lot of things right, but had gotten away from it
  • 21.
    SIMPLIFY! • Too manyproducts • 97 different vehicles being produced • Bad reporting structure for executives • Implement Matrix structure • More people reporting directly to Mulally improves his information
  • 22.
    THE PLAN • Aggressivelyrestructure to operate profitably at the current demand and changing model mix • Accelerate development of new products our customers want and value • Finance our plan and improve our balance sheet • Work together effectively as one team
  • 23.
    CASH IS THEKEY • Secure line of credit from Wall Street • Credit conditions already starting to tighten in 2006 • Secured up to $23B • Had to mortgage nearly every asset, including the blue oval logo • This is why Ford did not need a Federal bailout
  • 24.
    FOCUS ON COREBUSINESS • Selling off • Mazda • Aston-Martin • Jaguar • Volvo • Land Rover • Closing • Mercury – right now you will get in trouble if you park a Mercury in the Ford-only lot
  • 25.
    BACK TO 2BRANDS • Ford • Lincoln
  • 26.
    UNION NEGOTIATIONS • Fordlosing money on every car built in North America • Insurance was a major expense • $23B retiree health care liability on Ford’s books • Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (VEBA) negotiated to transfer this to UAW • In return. Ford committed to build the Focus in US instead of Mexico
  • 27.
    2008 – THECRASH • Ford announces that it will not be profitable in 2009 either, despite earlier projections • But will not stop investing in new vehicles • JD power says Ford only full-line automotive company to show consistent quality improvement • Operating costs cut by $5B in 2008 • And because Ford started sooner, it was in better shape than GM or Chrysler
  • 28.
    TURNING DOWN THEBAILOUT • Ford had a cash cushion now • The UAW wanted them to succeed • So in late 2008 Ford refused to take a bailout
  • 29.
    FORD SUCCEEDS • Bythe end of 2009 Ford did actually show a profit for the year, and has been profitable since then • Toyota hit a purported quality problem in 2009 involving acceleration that would not stop • In 2010 Ford began paying back borrowing and rebuilding its balance sheet • New cars like the Focus and Explorer were a success • Alan Mulally steps down in July 2014, and is succeeded by Mark Fields