Alkyl halides
Nucleophilic substitution and
elimination reactions
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Alkyl halides - industrial
sources
H C C H
HCl
HgCl2
H2C=CHCl
vinyl chloride
H H
H
vinyl
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Alkyl halides - industrial
sources
H C C H
HCl
HgCl2
H2C=CHCl
vinyl chloride
H2C=CH2
Cl2
500o
H2C=CHCl
CH3Cl + Hg2F2
CCl4 + SbF3
CH3F + Hg2Cl2
CCl2F2
Freon-12
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Preparation from alcohols
R-OH
HX
R-X
or PX3
or SOCl2
SOCl2 - thionyl chloride
RCH2OH + SOCl2
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
RCH2Cl + HCl +SO2
Halogenation of hydrocarbons
R-H
X2/h
RX
CH3
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
CH2Br
Br2
h
lachrymatory
Addition of HX to alkenes
C C
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
HX
C C
H X
C C
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
X2
C C
X X
C C
2X2
X X
C C
X X
Addition of halogens to
alkenes and alkynes
R-X + NaI
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
acetone
R-I + NaX
soluble insoluble
Finkelstein reaction
Nucleophilic substitution
reactions
The halide ion is the conjugate base of a strong acid. It
is therefore a very weak base and little disposed to share
its electrons.
When bonded to a carbon, the halogen is easily displaced
as a halide ion by stronger nucleophiles - it is a good
leaving group.
The typical reaction of alkyl halides is a nucleophilic
substitution:
R-X + Nu R-Nu + X-
the leaving
group
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Nucleophiles
• reagents that seek electron deficient centres
• negative ions or neutral molecules having at least
one unshared pair of electrons
-
3 3
H C C C + CH -Br 3
H C C C CH3 + Br-
H3C O
H
+ CH3-I H3C O
CH3
+ H
+ I-
nucleophile leaving group
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Leaving groups
• a substituent that can leave as a weakly basic
molecule or ion
Nu L
Nu + L Nu + L:
Br
 
NC Br NC
CN-
+ Br-
2
 
OH Cl OH2
Cl-
Cl 2
+ H O
+
Br
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010

PH3P

Br
+
Ph3P + Br
-
3
Ph P:
Nucleophilic substitution
CH3Br + CH3OH + Br-
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
OH-
A knowledge of how reaction rates depend on reactant
concentrations provides invaluable information about
reaction mechanisms. What is known about this
reaction?
Nucleophilic substitution
rate  [CH3Br][OH-]
rate = k[CH3Br][OH-]
CH3Br + CH3OH + Br-
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
OH-
[CH3Br]I
0.001 M
[OH-]I
1.0 M
initial rate
3 x 10-7 molL-1s-1
0.002 M 1.0 M 6 x 10-7 molL-1s-1
0.002 M 2.0 M 1.2 x 10-6 molL-1s-1
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Order - a summary
The order of a reaction is equal to the sum of the
exponents in the rate equation.
Thus for the rate equation rate = k[A]m[B]n, the overall
order is m + n.
The order with respect to A is m and the order with
respect to B is n.
Nucleophilic substitution
Br
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
CH3
CH3-C-CH3
OH
CH3
CH3-C-CH3 + OH-
+ Br-
rate  [(CH3)3CBr][OH-]0
rate = k[(CH3)3CBr]
[(CH3)3CBr]I
0.001 M
[OH-]I
1.0 M
initial rate
4 x 10-7 molL-1s-1
0.002 M 1.0 M 8 x 10-7 molL-1s-1
0.002 M 2.0 M 8 x 10-7 molL-1s-1
+ Br-
References of interest:
E.D. Hughes, C.K. Ingold, and C.S. Patel, J. Chem. Soc., 526 (1933)
J.L. Gleave, E.D. Hughes and C.K. Ingold, J. Chem. Soc., 236 (1935)
CH3Br + CH3OH + Br-
OH-
rate = k[CH3Br][OH-]
The SN2 mechanism
OH- Br HO
-
HO
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
-
Br
Stereochemistry of the SN2
reaction
OH- Br
-
HO
-
Br
Br
C6H13
H
H3C
(-)-2-bromooctane
[] = -34.6o
OH
C6H13
H
H3C
(-)-2-octanol
[] = -9.9o
(+)-2-octanol
[] = +9.9o
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
HO
HO
+ Br-
C6H13
H
CH3
A Walden inversion.
P. Walden, Uber die vermeintliche optische Activät der
Chlorumarsäure und über optisch active Halogen-
bernsteinsäre, Ber., 26, 210 (1893)
Stereochemistry of the SN2
reaction
Br
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
C6H13
H
H3C
HO
C6H13
H
CH3
(-)-2-bromooctane
[] = -34.6o
(+)-2-octanol
[] = +9.9o
optical purity = 100%
NaOH
N
S 2
The SN1 mechanism
rate = k[(CH3)3CBr]
Br
CH3
CH3-C-CH3 + OH-
CH3
CH3-C-CH3
OH
+ Br-
CH3
1. H3C C CH3
Br
CH3
+
H3C C CH3 + Br-
2.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
CH3
+
H3C C CH3 + OH-
CH3
H3C C CH3
OH
slow
fast
Carbocations
G.A. Olah, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 94, 808 (1972)
CH3
CH3 CH3CH2
+ +
1o
CH3CHCH3 CH3CCH3
+ +
2o
3o
sp2
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Carbocation stability
R
R C +
R
3o
H
> R C +
R
2o
H
> R C + >
H
1o
H
H C +
H
Hyperconjugation stabilizes the positive charge.
H
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
H
H
H
H
Stereochemical consequences of
a carbocation
CH3
1. H3C C CH3
Br
CH3
H3C C CH3
+
+ Br-
slow
OH-
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
H O
2
SN1
Br
C6H13
H
H3C
(-)-2-bromooctane
[] = -34.6o
?
Stereochemical consequences of
a carbocation
CH3
H3C C CH3
+
+ Br-
slow
6 13
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
(+)-C H CHOHCH3
OH-
H O
2
SN1
reduced optical
purity
Br
CH3
1. H3C C CH3
Br
C6H13
H
H3C
(-)-2-bromooctane
[] = -34.6o
Why?
retention
Stereochemical consequences of
a carbocation
CH3
H
C6H13
X-
+
C6H13
CH3
inversion predominates
H
HO
H2O
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Carbocation rearrangements
(CH3)3CCH2Br
C2H5O-
SN2
C2H5OH
SN1
(CH3)3CCH2OC2H5
Williamson ether synthesis
(CH3)2CCH2CH3
OC2H5
+
(CH3)2C=CHCH3
a rearrangement and
elimination
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Carbocation rearrangements
1,2 hydride and alkyl shifts
+
CH3CH2CH2CH2
1o
+
CH3CH2CHCH3
2o
.C
. C
+
H
C C
+ H
.C
. C
+
R
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
C C
+ R
Carbocation rearrangements
(CH3)3CCH2Br (CH3)3CCH2
+
CH3H
CH3H
H3C +
CH3
H3C + CH2CH3
CH3
H3C + CH2CH3
CH3
H3C CH2CH3
H
+OC2H5
C2H5OH
CH3
H3C CH2CH3
H
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
+OC2H5
-H+ CH3
H3C CH2CH3
OC2H5
HO Br
- -
Steric effects in the SN2
reaction
OH- Br HO
+ Br-
-
HO
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
-
Br
Look at the transition state to see how substituents might
affect this reaction.
Steric effects in the SN2
reaction
The order of reactivity of RX in these SN2 reactions is
CH3X > 1o > 2o > 3o
HO
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Br
- -
Steric effects in the SN2
reaction
> (CH3)2CHBr
0.01
CH3Br >
150
reactivity
CH3CH2Br
1
RBr + I-
RI + Br-
- -
I Br - -
I Br - -
I Br
-
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
-
I Br
> (CH3)3CBr
0.001
Structural effects in SN1
reactions
3o > 2o > 1o > CH3X
R-X
+ -
R X R+
+ X-
HCO2H
RBr + H2O ROH + HBr
(CH3)3CBr > (CH3)2CHBr > CH3CH2Br > CH3Br
100,000,000 45 1.7 1
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Nucleophilicity
Rates of SN2 reactions depend on concentration and
nucleophilicity of the nucleophile.
A base is more nucleophilic than its conjugate acid:
CH3Cl + H2O  CH3OH2+
CH3Cl + HO-  CH3OH
slow
fast
The nucleophilicity of nucleophiles having the same
nucleophilic atom parallels basicity:
-
RO- > HO- >> RCO2 > ROH >H2O
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Nucleophilicity
When the nucleophilic atoms are different, their relative
strengths do not always parallel their basicity.
In protic solvents, the larger the nucleophilic atom, the
better:
I- > Br- > Cl- > F-
In protic solvents, the smaller the anion, the greater its
solvation due to hydrogen bonding. This shell of solvent
molecules reduces its ability to attack.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Nucleophilicity
Aprotic solvents tend to solvate cations rather than
anions. Thus the unsolvated anion has a greater
nucleophilicity in an aprotic solvent.
Polar aprotic solvents
H
O
N
CH3
H C
3
N,N-dimethylformamide
DMF
O
H3C
S
CH3
dimethyl sulfoxide
DMSO
These solvents dissolve
ionic compounds.
O
(H3C)2N P N(CH3)2
N(CH3)2
hexamethylphosphoramide
HMPA
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Solvent polarity
more polar transition state less
solvated than reagents
A protic solvent will decrease the rate of this reaction and
the reaction is 1,200,000 faster in DMF than in methanol.
Cl- I
H
H
H
Cl
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
- -
I
Solvent polarity
R-X
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
+ -
R X R+
+ X-
less polar more polar
greater stabilization by
polar solvent
The transition state is more polarized.
Therefore the rate of this reaction increases with
increase in solvent polarity.
A protic solvent is particularly effective as it stabilizes
the transition state by forming hydrogen bonds with the
leaving group.
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Solvent polarity
Explain the solvent effects for each of the following second
order reactions:
131I-
3
a) + CH3I  CH 131I + I-
Relative rates: in water, 1; in methanol, 16; in ethanol, 44
b) (n-C3H7)3N + CH3I  (n-C3H7)3N+CH3 I-
Relative rates: in n-hexane, 1; in chloroform, 13 000
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Leaving group ability
Weak bases are good leaving groups.
They are better able to accommodate a negative charge
and therefore stabilize the transition state.
Thus I- is a better leaving group than Br-.
I- > Br- > Cl- > H2O > F- > OH-
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
SN1 v SN2
SN2
second order
CH3X > 1o > 2o > 3o
no rearrangements
inversion of configuration
reactivity: 3o > 2o > 1o > CH3X
rearrangements
partial inversion
eliminations possible
kinetics:
SN1
1st order
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Problems
Try problems 6.6 – 6.11 and 6.14 – 6.16 in chapter 6 of
Solomons and Fryhle.
Functional group transformations
using SN2 reactions
CN-
R-CN nitrile
'R
C
C-
R C C R'
alkyne
R = Me, 1o, or 2o
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
Problems
Try problems 6.12 and 6.17 in chapter 6 of Solomons
and Fryhle.
ROH + HX - an SN reaction
CH3CHCH3
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
OH
ROH + HX RX + H2O
HX: HI > HBr > HCl
ROH: 3o
> 2o
> 1o
HBr or
NaBr/H2SO4
CH3CHCH3
Br
Experimental facts
1. The reaction is acid catalyzed
2. Rearrangements are possible
HCl
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
H3C C C CH3 H3C C
H OH Cl
CH3 H CH3 H
C CH3
H
3. Alcohol reactivity is 3o > 2o > 1o < CH3OH
The mechanism
1. ROH + HX
+
ROH2 + X-
2. ROH2
+
+
R + H2O
+
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
-
3. R + X RX
Reaction of primary alcohols
with HX
SN2
HX: HI > HBr > HCl
1. ROH + HX
+
ROH2 + X-
1o
+
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010
2. ROH2 + X-
- +
X R OH2 RX + H2O
© E.V. Blackburn, 2010

alkylgghhhhhhhyyggghyyyyyuuu_halides.pptx

  • 1.
    Alkyl halides Nucleophilic substitutionand elimination reactions © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 2.
    Alkyl halides -industrial sources H C C H HCl HgCl2 H2C=CHCl vinyl chloride H H H vinyl © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 3.
    Alkyl halides -industrial sources H C C H HCl HgCl2 H2C=CHCl vinyl chloride H2C=CH2 Cl2 500o H2C=CHCl CH3Cl + Hg2F2 CCl4 + SbF3 CH3F + Hg2Cl2 CCl2F2 Freon-12 © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 4.
    Preparation from alcohols R-OH HX R-X orPX3 or SOCl2 SOCl2 - thionyl chloride RCH2OH + SOCl2 © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 RCH2Cl + HCl +SO2
  • 5.
    Halogenation of hydrocarbons R-H X2/h RX CH3 ©E.V. Blackburn, 2010 CH2Br Br2 h lachrymatory
  • 6.
    Addition of HXto alkenes C C © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 HX C C H X
  • 7.
    C C © E.V.Blackburn, 2010 X2 C C X X C C 2X2 X X C C X X Addition of halogens to alkenes and alkynes
  • 8.
    R-X + NaI ©E.V. Blackburn, 2010 acetone R-I + NaX soluble insoluble Finkelstein reaction
  • 9.
    Nucleophilic substitution reactions The halideion is the conjugate base of a strong acid. It is therefore a very weak base and little disposed to share its electrons. When bonded to a carbon, the halogen is easily displaced as a halide ion by stronger nucleophiles - it is a good leaving group. The typical reaction of alkyl halides is a nucleophilic substitution: R-X + Nu R-Nu + X- the leaving group © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 10.
    Nucleophiles • reagents thatseek electron deficient centres • negative ions or neutral molecules having at least one unshared pair of electrons - 3 3 H C C C + CH -Br 3 H C C C CH3 + Br- H3C O H + CH3-I H3C O CH3 + H + I- nucleophile leaving group © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 11.
    Leaving groups • asubstituent that can leave as a weakly basic molecule or ion Nu L Nu + L Nu + L: Br   NC Br NC CN- + Br- 2   OH Cl OH2 Cl- Cl 2 + H O + Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2010  PH3P  Br + Ph3P + Br - 3 Ph P:
  • 12.
    Nucleophilic substitution CH3Br +CH3OH + Br- © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 OH- A knowledge of how reaction rates depend on reactant concentrations provides invaluable information about reaction mechanisms. What is known about this reaction?
  • 13.
    Nucleophilic substitution rate [CH3Br][OH-] rate = k[CH3Br][OH-] CH3Br + CH3OH + Br- © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 OH- [CH3Br]I 0.001 M [OH-]I 1.0 M initial rate 3 x 10-7 molL-1s-1 0.002 M 1.0 M 6 x 10-7 molL-1s-1 0.002 M 2.0 M 1.2 x 10-6 molL-1s-1
  • 14.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Order - a summary The order of a reaction is equal to the sum of the exponents in the rate equation. Thus for the rate equation rate = k[A]m[B]n, the overall order is m + n. The order with respect to A is m and the order with respect to B is n.
  • 15.
    Nucleophilic substitution Br © E.V.Blackburn, 2010 CH3 CH3-C-CH3 OH CH3 CH3-C-CH3 + OH- + Br- rate  [(CH3)3CBr][OH-]0 rate = k[(CH3)3CBr] [(CH3)3CBr]I 0.001 M [OH-]I 1.0 M initial rate 4 x 10-7 molL-1s-1 0.002 M 1.0 M 8 x 10-7 molL-1s-1 0.002 M 2.0 M 8 x 10-7 molL-1s-1
  • 16.
    + Br- References ofinterest: E.D. Hughes, C.K. Ingold, and C.S. Patel, J. Chem. Soc., 526 (1933) J.L. Gleave, E.D. Hughes and C.K. Ingold, J. Chem. Soc., 236 (1935) CH3Br + CH3OH + Br- OH- rate = k[CH3Br][OH-] The SN2 mechanism OH- Br HO - HO © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 - Br
  • 17.
    Stereochemistry of theSN2 reaction OH- Br - HO - Br Br C6H13 H H3C (-)-2-bromooctane [] = -34.6o OH C6H13 H H3C (-)-2-octanol [] = -9.9o (+)-2-octanol [] = +9.9o © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 HO HO + Br- C6H13 H CH3
  • 18.
    A Walden inversion. P.Walden, Uber die vermeintliche optische Activät der Chlorumarsäure und über optisch active Halogen- bernsteinsäre, Ber., 26, 210 (1893) Stereochemistry of the SN2 reaction Br © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 C6H13 H H3C HO C6H13 H CH3 (-)-2-bromooctane [] = -34.6o (+)-2-octanol [] = +9.9o optical purity = 100% NaOH N S 2
  • 19.
    The SN1 mechanism rate= k[(CH3)3CBr] Br CH3 CH3-C-CH3 + OH- CH3 CH3-C-CH3 OH + Br- CH3 1. H3C C CH3 Br CH3 + H3C C CH3 + Br- 2. © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 CH3 + H3C C CH3 + OH- CH3 H3C C CH3 OH slow fast
  • 20.
    Carbocations G.A. Olah, J.Amer. Chem. Soc., 94, 808 (1972) CH3 CH3 CH3CH2 + + 1o CH3CHCH3 CH3CCH3 + + 2o 3o sp2 © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 21.
    Carbocation stability R R C+ R 3o H > R C + R 2o H > R C + > H 1o H H C + H Hyperconjugation stabilizes the positive charge. H © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 H H H H
  • 22.
    Stereochemical consequences of acarbocation CH3 1. H3C C CH3 Br CH3 H3C C CH3 + + Br- slow OH- © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 H O 2 SN1 Br C6H13 H H3C (-)-2-bromooctane [] = -34.6o ?
  • 23.
    Stereochemical consequences of acarbocation CH3 H3C C CH3 + + Br- slow 6 13 © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 (+)-C H CHOHCH3 OH- H O 2 SN1 reduced optical purity Br CH3 1. H3C C CH3 Br C6H13 H H3C (-)-2-bromooctane [] = -34.6o Why?
  • 24.
    retention Stereochemical consequences of acarbocation CH3 H C6H13 X- + C6H13 CH3 inversion predominates H HO H2O © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 25.
    Carbocation rearrangements (CH3)3CCH2Br C2H5O- SN2 C2H5OH SN1 (CH3)3CCH2OC2H5 Williamson ethersynthesis (CH3)2CCH2CH3 OC2H5 + (CH3)2C=CHCH3 a rearrangement and elimination © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 26.
    Carbocation rearrangements 1,2 hydrideand alkyl shifts + CH3CH2CH2CH2 1o + CH3CH2CHCH3 2o .C . C + H C C + H .C . C + R © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 C C + R
  • 27.
    Carbocation rearrangements (CH3)3CCH2Br (CH3)3CCH2 + CH3H CH3H H3C+ CH3 H3C + CH2CH3 CH3 H3C + CH2CH3 CH3 H3C CH2CH3 H +OC2H5 C2H5OH CH3 H3C CH2CH3 H © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 +OC2H5 -H+ CH3 H3C CH2CH3 OC2H5
  • 28.
    HO Br - - Stericeffects in the SN2 reaction OH- Br HO + Br- - HO © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 - Br Look at the transition state to see how substituents might affect this reaction.
  • 29.
    Steric effects inthe SN2 reaction The order of reactivity of RX in these SN2 reactions is CH3X > 1o > 2o > 3o HO © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 Br - -
  • 30.
    Steric effects inthe SN2 reaction > (CH3)2CHBr 0.01 CH3Br > 150 reactivity CH3CH2Br 1 RBr + I- RI + Br- - - I Br - - I Br - - I Br - © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 - I Br > (CH3)3CBr 0.001
  • 31.
    Structural effects inSN1 reactions 3o > 2o > 1o > CH3X R-X + - R X R+ + X- HCO2H RBr + H2O ROH + HBr (CH3)3CBr > (CH3)2CHBr > CH3CH2Br > CH3Br 100,000,000 45 1.7 1 © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 32.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Nucleophilicity Rates of SN2 reactions depend on concentration and nucleophilicity of the nucleophile. A base is more nucleophilic than its conjugate acid: CH3Cl + H2O  CH3OH2+ CH3Cl + HO-  CH3OH slow fast The nucleophilicity of nucleophiles having the same nucleophilic atom parallels basicity: - RO- > HO- >> RCO2 > ROH >H2O
  • 33.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Nucleophilicity When the nucleophilic atoms are different, their relative strengths do not always parallel their basicity. In protic solvents, the larger the nucleophilic atom, the better: I- > Br- > Cl- > F- In protic solvents, the smaller the anion, the greater its solvation due to hydrogen bonding. This shell of solvent molecules reduces its ability to attack.
  • 34.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Nucleophilicity Aprotic solvents tend to solvate cations rather than anions. Thus the unsolvated anion has a greater nucleophilicity in an aprotic solvent.
  • 35.
    Polar aprotic solvents H O N CH3 HC 3 N,N-dimethylformamide DMF O H3C S CH3 dimethyl sulfoxide DMSO These solvents dissolve ionic compounds. O (H3C)2N P N(CH3)2 N(CH3)2 hexamethylphosphoramide HMPA © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 36.
    Solvent polarity more polartransition state less solvated than reagents A protic solvent will decrease the rate of this reaction and the reaction is 1,200,000 faster in DMF than in methanol. Cl- I H H H Cl © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 - - I
  • 37.
    Solvent polarity R-X © E.V.Blackburn, 2010 + - R X R+ + X- less polar more polar greater stabilization by polar solvent The transition state is more polarized. Therefore the rate of this reaction increases with increase in solvent polarity. A protic solvent is particularly effective as it stabilizes the transition state by forming hydrogen bonds with the leaving group.
  • 38.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Solvent polarity Explain the solvent effects for each of the following second order reactions: 131I- 3 a) + CH3I  CH 131I + I- Relative rates: in water, 1; in methanol, 16; in ethanol, 44 b) (n-C3H7)3N + CH3I  (n-C3H7)3N+CH3 I- Relative rates: in n-hexane, 1; in chloroform, 13 000
  • 39.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Leaving group ability Weak bases are good leaving groups. They are better able to accommodate a negative charge and therefore stabilize the transition state. Thus I- is a better leaving group than Br-. I- > Br- > Cl- > H2O > F- > OH-
  • 40.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 SN1 v SN2 SN2 second order CH3X > 1o > 2o > 3o no rearrangements inversion of configuration reactivity: 3o > 2o > 1o > CH3X rearrangements partial inversion eliminations possible kinetics: SN1 1st order
  • 41.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Problems Try problems 6.6 – 6.11 and 6.14 – 6.16 in chapter 6 of Solomons and Fryhle.
  • 42.
    Functional group transformations usingSN2 reactions CN- R-CN nitrile 'R C C- R C C R' alkyne R = Me, 1o, or 2o © E.V. Blackburn, 2010
  • 43.
    © E.V. Blackburn,2010 Problems Try problems 6.12 and 6.17 in chapter 6 of Solomons and Fryhle.
  • 44.
    ROH + HX- an SN reaction CH3CHCH3 © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 OH ROH + HX RX + H2O HX: HI > HBr > HCl ROH: 3o > 2o > 1o HBr or NaBr/H2SO4 CH3CHCH3 Br
  • 45.
    Experimental facts 1. Thereaction is acid catalyzed 2. Rearrangements are possible HCl © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 H3C C C CH3 H3C C H OH Cl CH3 H CH3 H C CH3 H 3. Alcohol reactivity is 3o > 2o > 1o < CH3OH
  • 46.
    The mechanism 1. ROH+ HX + ROH2 + X- 2. ROH2 + + R + H2O + © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 - 3. R + X RX
  • 47.
    Reaction of primaryalcohols with HX SN2 HX: HI > HBr > HCl 1. ROH + HX + ROH2 + X- 1o + © E.V. Blackburn, 2010 2. ROH2 + X- - + X R OH2 RX + H2O
  • 48.