This document provides instructions for a final design project and report for an architecture course. Students are asked to further develop their schematic design from the previous phase to incorporate more detailed environmental and technological strategies. They must submit a final design presentation with drawings, models and renderings, as well as a 5000-word comprehensive report covering site context, design intentions, and sustainability features. The report and presentation will be assessed based on learning outcomes related to design development, performance considerations, and effective communication of the design concept and ideas.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp Network
ADP - PROJ 1C BRIEF
1. 1 | P a g e
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, BUILDING AND DESIGN
Centre for Architecture Studies in Southeast Asia (MASSA)
Bachelor of Science (Honours) (Architecture)
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN PROJECT [ARC60108]
Sustaining Humanities
Project 1c: Detailed Design and Final Executive Report
Assessments Type Learning
outcomes
Due Presentation Assessment Weight/
Submission
Final
Assessment
Individual 4-6 Week 15
Week 16
Final Design
and Report
60% Presentation
10% Design Report
yy
`
Introduction
In addition to students ability to develop their own position in developing their individual project within
the theme of ‘sustaining humanities’- architecture for people, place and time, one key aspect of the
design project is to develop holistic and integrated aspects of technology, environment and cultural
context in architectural design.
Subsequent to Phase 2: Design Strategy and Schematic Design phase, students are required to further
develop scheme with the incorporation of environmental strategies and technological resolutions. The
intention of integrating the E&T aspect is to strengthen design on the aspect of sustainability and
buildability. Student will have additional guidance from their E&T tutor who will look into improving
Image: sectional perspective of building with all the integrated aspects
http://openbuildings.com/buildings/peoples-association-headquarters-profile-5438?_show_description=1
2. 2 | P a g e
the green and sustainability component, suggesting on passive cooling techniques and technological
innovations. The studies will be included in a 5000 word comprehensive design report.
This phase is integrated with the module Building Technology 2. The co-requisite module will look into
how to improve the structural aspect and buildability of the project.
Objectives of Project
The objective of Phase 1c is:
To consolidate an understanding of the holistic nature of the architectural design process, to a
given degree of detail, with emphasis on design as an integrative process, drawing as
appropriate on previous subjects of the program.
Learning Outcomes of this Project
1. Produce design development drawings for a selected portion of design with a suitable level of
Complexity.
2. Design with considerations of building performance (thermal comfort, acoustic and lighting),
regulatory frameworks, and health and safety considerations.
3. Produce drawings (both 2D and 3D), modelling, verbal presentation and a design report to
communicate and visualize architectural design and ideas.
Tasks - Methodology
1. Based on your proposed sketch design, consider and include expanded aspects of design
development in tandem with the design of spaces, e.g. regulatory requirements, fire safety,
materials, construction, sustainability, feasibility and other relevant considerations, wherever
possible, integrating their development to produce a richer, more multi-layered design.
2. Develop a selected portion of your design for technological development and resolution.
Tectonic thinking in design approach.
3. Integrate environmental strategies into your design. May look into current sustainable trends
and design features.
4. To present work in a most comprehensive, systematic, creative and comprehendible manner.
Architectural Visualization, modelling and report.
3. 3 | P a g e
Submission Requirement
1) A Final Design Panel (6-10 A1 Panels)
Design panel will include the following:
1.1 Project Profile & Description
a. Project profile and site description
b. Design Statement and conceptual write up
c. Architectural position + design considerations
d. Design conceptual development (diagrams)
1.2 2- Drawings/Orthogonal
a. Site Plan (1:400 minimum scale)
b. Floor Plans
c. Elevations (1:200 minimum scale)
d. Sections
1.3 3-D Drawings (completely rendered)
a. Exterior View in relation to site (aerial/bird’s/elevated view)
b. Exterior view in relation to people (street/normal view)
c. Walk through the spaces (outside-inside)
d. Sectional Perspective
1.4 Architectural Detailing (1:20. 1:10 scale)
a. Full detailed wall section
b. Design features and innovations (2D/3D)
(Blow-up details)
Note: For specific requirements for item 1.4
refer to Building Technology 2 Project 2 Brief.
1.5 Scaled Model (1:200 minimum scale)
a. To show how building sits on site
b. To show overall design and building massing.
c. Scaled as per advised by studio supervisor
4. 4 | P a g e
2) A Final Design Report
a. A3 landscape format
b. Approximately 5000 words.
Design Report Guidelines
a. Introduction (1-2 pages)
Title of your project
Abstract (200 words)
Introduction
Project Aims and Objectives
b. Site Investigation & Contextual Studies (2-4 pages)
Introduction
Historical background
Site Significant Issues
Urban Studies
Macro site analysis
c. Project Background & Design Intentions Strategies (3-5pages)
Micro site analysis
Precedent studies
Design intention
Programme and project brief
Site response
Spatial Programming
Morphological/Form studies (Adhering to the theme)
d. Environmental and Technological strategies (5-7pages)
Site planning strategies
Orientation: Wind and Solar analysis
Environmental Strategies
Sustainability concepts
Energy conservation features
Material and Resources
Acoustical Consideration
Innovations (rainwater harvesting, solar panels, others)
Structural concept (buildability, structural logic, others)
All Images:
http://www.firstinarchitecture.co.uk/archi
tecture-presentation-board-tips/
5. 5 | P a g e
Marking criteria
There will be two (2) Assessments – Design Project and Design Report
1.0 Design Detailed Project Assessment Scheme
Marking Criteria
Marks%
FAIL
(F)
POOR
(D-,D,D+)
PASS
(C)
SATISFACTORY
(C+,B-)
GOOD
(B,B+)
VERYGOO
(A-)
EXCELLENT
(A)
Assessment
Component
Weightage
These will be assessed via the
following compliance with the
learning outcomes
100
0-39
40-49
50-54
55-64
65-74
75-79
80-100
1.0 Narrative and Project Brief
1.1 Clarity and richness of
architectural position/exploration,
project aims and objectives evident
in the design work
1.2 Relevance of architecture
programme and brief
__/10%
2.0 References and Guidelines
2.1 Use of precedent studies in the
generation of programme and
design strategies.
2.2 Adhere to relevant guidelines and
design theme (project brief, UBBL,
Bomba, ROL, others.)
__/10%
3.0 Design approach and concept
3.1 Clarity, appropriateness and rigor
of design proposition/ strategy in
response to the contextual
conditions (synthesis on programme
and context in deriving design.
3.2 Detailed design that meets
functional requirements (planning) of
the proposed programme and
contextual conditions.
__/30%
4.0 Poetics, Tectonics & Exploration
Design Development drawing for a
selected portion of design with
suitable level of complexity and
supporting the students’ design
exploration. (space and tectonics)
__/15%
6. 6 | P a g e
5.0 Buildability and Performance
5.1 Consideration of building
performance: thermal comfort,
acoustic and lighting.
5.2 Adapting regulatory framework
that guide design and building
construction.
5.3 Adapting health and safety
guidelines in design.
__/15%
6.0 Overall presentation and design
communications
___/15%
7.0 Verbal communications ___/5%
Assessment Weight: 50% Total (Over-all) ____/100
Note: 1. Rubric Assessment is attached to the Project 1a Assessment Sheet, refer to as page
2.0 Design Project Report Assessment Sheet
Marking Criteria
Marks%
FAIL
(F)
POOR
(D-,D,D+)
PASS
(C)
SATISFACTORY
(C+,B-)
GOOD
(B,B+)
VERYGOO
(A-)
EXCELLENT
(A)
Assessment
Component
Weightage
These will be assessed via the
following compliance with the
learning outcomes
10%
0-39
40-49
50-54
55-64
65-74
75-79
80-1001.0 Project background & brief __/10%
2.0 Site Investigation &
Contextual Studies & Analysis __/10%
3.0 Design Intentions/Strategies
Exploration through design
-Design suitability
-Building Performance
-Compliance with ordinances.
-Site planning Strategies
-Spatial Programming
__/35%
4.0 Sustainable Feature and
Elements (E&T Strategies)
-structural and buildability
-services and requirements
__/20%
5.0 Final Design
-Site Plan and Floor Plans
-Elevations and Sections
-Rendered 3D Drawings
-Axon & Sectional Perspective
-Others (details, wallsection, etc.)
__/20%
7. 7 | P a g e
6.0 Tutorial Log Sheets __/5%
Assessment Weight: 10% Total (Over-all) ____/100%
Suggested References
1. Allison, P. David Adjaya, Making Public Buildings. London: Thames & Hudson
2. Baker, G. 1989. Design Strategies In Architecture (2nd
Ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3. Hertzberger, H. 1991. Lessons For Students In Architecture. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers.
4. Ligtelijn, V. 1999. Aldo Van Eyck Works. (1995 Ed.). The Netherlands: Thoth Publisher.
5. Allen, E.,1993 Architectural Detailing: Function, Constructability-Aesthetics(3rd
Ed.): Wiley
6. Bauer, M, Mosle, P. and Schwarz, M., Green Building: Guidebook for Sustainable Architecture:
Springer
7. Charleson, A., Structure in Architecture: A Sourcebook for Architects and Structural Engineers
(2nd
Ed.): Routledge
8. Yee, R, Architectural Drawing: A Visual Compendium (4th
Ed.), 2003, Wiley
9. Architect’s Data, Ernst and Neufert, P. 4th
Ed., 2012, Wiley-Blackwell
10. Abu Bakar, H., (2006), Guide to Fire Protection in Malaysia, Malaysia, The Institute of Fire
Engineers (UK) Malaysia Branch, Kuala Lumpur.
Timeline and Schedule
Week 9 : Exploration on Tectonic qualities of design, Spatial & Form articulation
Week 10 : Finalizing Schemes Spatial Planning & Form Design
Week 11 : Finalizing Design with structural details and components.
Week 12 : Finalizing Design with structural details and components.
Interim- Design Final Working on minor improvements/ additions. 70% done
Week 13 : Finalizing final detailed design and presentation
Design Final Working on minor improvements/ additions. 80-90% done
Week 14 : Printing and preparation (Optional Tutorial)
Week 15 : Final Submission and Pin-up
Final Design Review
Week 16 : ADP Comprehensive Report Submission
Note : Refer to module outline for the detailed activities, tutorials and suggested references.
8. 8 | P a g e
Submission Date and Guidelines
Interim : Monday, 20 November 2017 (Week 12)
Final Submission
Project 1c Pin-up : Wednesday, 13 December 2017 (Week 15)
Final Design Review : Thursday, 14 December 2017 (Week 15)
Final Comprehensive : Monday, 18 December 2017 (Week 16)
Executive Report
Note:
1. Final presentation schedule and pin-up layout to be released and uploaded on the
TIMeS portal on Week 13.
2. Student should present within 20-30 minutes including Q &A from the external panellists.
3. TGC Portfolio link to be submitted to Facebook Group Page.
4. ADP Report to be submitted on 18th
December 2017, before 2:00 pm
at C5 Academic Staff Room.
Prepared by: Approved by:
Prince Favis Isip Mohd Adib Ramli
……………………………. …………………………….
Date: 24/8/2017 Date: 25/8/2017
Stream Coordinator Programme Director
(Design Studies)
Email: princefavis.isip@taylors.edu.my
Remarks:
1. The Project Brief is to be distributed to the students in the first week of the semester.
2. Any changes to the Project Brief shall be communicated (in writing) to the Programme Director and
the approved revised version must be communicated to the students