Identifying and supporting children
affected by parental substance use
ADEPIS resource launch
7th November 2013
Key messages
• Schools have both the responsibility and the
ability to support children affected by parental
substance use
• Safeguarding: a matter of child welfare, not drug
and alcohol expertise
• Existing structures/policies cover most of this
work already, but added focus is needed
• PSU is not a school’s ‘problem’ to ‘solve’, but they
can play an important role in identifying these
children, and have a positive impact on their lives
Scale of the problem
• 250 – 350,000 children affected by parental drug use in UK
(Hidden Harm)
• At least 120,000 children living with a parent currently in
treatment
• 6% / 700,000 live with dependent drinker
• 100 children a week call Childline worried about their parents’
drinking
• Serious Case Reviews: 22% drug use, 22% alcohol use
• Comparison: 67,000 looked after children, 382,000 assessed
as ‘in need’ (2011-12)
Impacts
•
•
•
•
•

Neglect
Disruption of routine
Inadequate supervision
Physical/emotional abuse
Inappropriate parenting
practices
• Poverty
• Domestic violence
• Exposure to drugs and
paraphernalia

• Loyalty and protection
of parents
• Reluctance to disclose
• Guilt, shame, stigma
• Sadness, isolation,
depression
• Anger and frustration
• Fear, anxiety (for their
parents and for
themselves)
Indicators
•
•
•
•
•
•

Social isolation
Difficulties completing homework on time
Being bullied – or bullying?
Poor attendance/late arrival
Tiredness or lack of concentration
Lack of parental interest/engagement e.g. Not attending
parents’ evenings
• Unavailability for school clubs/trips
• Behavioural difficulties
• Academic underachievement
School impacts
Age

5-9

10-14

15+

Impact
School medical checks missed; poorer school
attendance/preparation/concentration; restricted
friendships; excessive responsibility for parents/siblings;
more antisocial acts (boys); depression, anxiety, withdrawal
(girls)
Continued poor academic performance; looking after
siblings; early smoking more likely; little parental support;
bullying

Lack of suitable role models; poor educational attainment
may affect long-term life chances
Educational impacts
• “At school I would text my mum because I was scared I wasn’t
there to look after her”
• “Everyone seems to be getting others’ advice on University
applications but I don’t want anyone to read mine. I have had
to write about mum’s alcoholism and the homelessness as
part of the extenuating circumstances so I dont want anyone
knowing.”
• “I've recently started University (for the 2nd time) and have
really enjoyed it so far, but it is still really hard sometimes as I
have moved away from home, leaving my mum to deal with
my dad, who's the alcoholic in my family. While it is nice to
have a break from all of it, I still feel really guilty”
Why schools?
• May have a window into children’s lives that other
services do not
• Child focused by definition
• Early intervention
• Not necessarily a social care issue
• Provide a safe haven/structured environment
• Protective factors: trusted adults, success outside the
home
• Schools hold a lot of information on children: looked
after, child protection plan, special educational needs
etc
Why schools?
• ACMD: ‘No school should assume that none of its children have
drug problems’
• Minister: ‘Ofsted take particular interest in the experiences of more
vulnerable children’
• NICE: ‘schools should ensure teachers and practitioners are trained
to identify and assess the early signs of anxiety [and] emotional
distress’
• Munro report: ‘schools are particularly well placed to notice
children and young people in need of help and to notice where
there are more serious concerns about their safety’
• ACPO/DfE: ‘schools will be alert to behaviour which may indicate
that the child is experiencing difficult home circumstances’
How schools can help
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•

Pattern and structure
Trusted adults
Identified special teachers to talk to
Reassurance – not alone, not to blame, not
betraying anyone by speaking about it
Home visits by school nurses
Somewhere quiet to relax
Support with school work
Access to breakfast/after school clubs, careers
advice, extra-curricular activities
Which policies?
Safeguarding/

child
protection

Antibullying

Parental
involvement

Young
carers

PSU
Drugs

PSHE/Drug
Education

Vulnerable/
looked after
children
Which staff?
Governors
Named
lead?

Teachers

School
nurses

PSU

DSP for
child
protection

Nonteaching
link
workers

Education
welfare
Head
teachers
Further resources
Drug-specific
• STARS
• Al-Anon
• COAP
• NACOA
• Action on Addiction

General
• TES
• NSPCC
• Carers Trust
• Grandparents Plus
Get in touch
• @AdfamUK
• @MentorADEPIS
• www.adfam.org.uk
• www.mentor-adepis.org.uk
• o.french@adfam.org.uk
• 020 7553 7640

Identifying and supporting children affected by parental substance use

  • 1.
    Identifying and supportingchildren affected by parental substance use ADEPIS resource launch 7th November 2013
  • 2.
    Key messages • Schoolshave both the responsibility and the ability to support children affected by parental substance use • Safeguarding: a matter of child welfare, not drug and alcohol expertise • Existing structures/policies cover most of this work already, but added focus is needed • PSU is not a school’s ‘problem’ to ‘solve’, but they can play an important role in identifying these children, and have a positive impact on their lives
  • 3.
    Scale of theproblem • 250 – 350,000 children affected by parental drug use in UK (Hidden Harm) • At least 120,000 children living with a parent currently in treatment • 6% / 700,000 live with dependent drinker • 100 children a week call Childline worried about their parents’ drinking • Serious Case Reviews: 22% drug use, 22% alcohol use • Comparison: 67,000 looked after children, 382,000 assessed as ‘in need’ (2011-12)
  • 4.
    Impacts • • • • • Neglect Disruption of routine Inadequatesupervision Physical/emotional abuse Inappropriate parenting practices • Poverty • Domestic violence • Exposure to drugs and paraphernalia • Loyalty and protection of parents • Reluctance to disclose • Guilt, shame, stigma • Sadness, isolation, depression • Anger and frustration • Fear, anxiety (for their parents and for themselves)
  • 5.
    Indicators • • • • • • Social isolation Difficulties completinghomework on time Being bullied – or bullying? Poor attendance/late arrival Tiredness or lack of concentration Lack of parental interest/engagement e.g. Not attending parents’ evenings • Unavailability for school clubs/trips • Behavioural difficulties • Academic underachievement
  • 6.
    School impacts Age 5-9 10-14 15+ Impact School medicalchecks missed; poorer school attendance/preparation/concentration; restricted friendships; excessive responsibility for parents/siblings; more antisocial acts (boys); depression, anxiety, withdrawal (girls) Continued poor academic performance; looking after siblings; early smoking more likely; little parental support; bullying Lack of suitable role models; poor educational attainment may affect long-term life chances
  • 7.
    Educational impacts • “Atschool I would text my mum because I was scared I wasn’t there to look after her” • “Everyone seems to be getting others’ advice on University applications but I don’t want anyone to read mine. I have had to write about mum’s alcoholism and the homelessness as part of the extenuating circumstances so I dont want anyone knowing.” • “I've recently started University (for the 2nd time) and have really enjoyed it so far, but it is still really hard sometimes as I have moved away from home, leaving my mum to deal with my dad, who's the alcoholic in my family. While it is nice to have a break from all of it, I still feel really guilty”
  • 8.
    Why schools? • Mayhave a window into children’s lives that other services do not • Child focused by definition • Early intervention • Not necessarily a social care issue • Provide a safe haven/structured environment • Protective factors: trusted adults, success outside the home • Schools hold a lot of information on children: looked after, child protection plan, special educational needs etc
  • 9.
    Why schools? • ACMD:‘No school should assume that none of its children have drug problems’ • Minister: ‘Ofsted take particular interest in the experiences of more vulnerable children’ • NICE: ‘schools should ensure teachers and practitioners are trained to identify and assess the early signs of anxiety [and] emotional distress’ • Munro report: ‘schools are particularly well placed to notice children and young people in need of help and to notice where there are more serious concerns about their safety’ • ACPO/DfE: ‘schools will be alert to behaviour which may indicate that the child is experiencing difficult home circumstances’
  • 10.
    How schools canhelp • • • • • • • • Pattern and structure Trusted adults Identified special teachers to talk to Reassurance – not alone, not to blame, not betraying anyone by speaking about it Home visits by school nurses Somewhere quiet to relax Support with school work Access to breakfast/after school clubs, careers advice, extra-curricular activities
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Further resources Drug-specific • STARS •Al-Anon • COAP • NACOA • Action on Addiction General • TES • NSPCC • Carers Trust • Grandparents Plus
  • 14.
    Get in touch •@AdfamUK • @MentorADEPIS • www.adfam.org.uk • www.mentor-adepis.org.uk • o.french@adfam.org.uk • 020 7553 7640

Editor's Notes

  • #4 The HH figures are for serious drug dependencies ie heroin/crack. Don’t take account of alcohol or other kinds of substance use. 2-3% England and Wales, 4-6% ScotlandBack of an envelope = half a dozen per primary school, and a whole class’s worth in secondary. Social work caseloads: estimates vary widely. Comparison: basic point is that the figures compare ‘favourably’, if that’s the word, with other categories of need that are more ‘famous’
  • #5 Not all drug specific. Colour coding – green (general vulnerability) amber (could need specific recognition of the drug issue) red (drug specific)Not ‘linear’ impact: more drug use doesn’t necessarily equal bigger impact.
  • #6 Again, not all are drug-specific. In fact I’m not sure any of them areIf you were a teacher – which would you notice, and how would you act on them? If you thought drugs were involved, would you think differently?
  • #7 Bullying – both bullied and bullying.If you were a teacher, which would you notice?
  • #8 Quotes taken from the COAP web forums. Also carries over into university life
  • #9 Often cases of children being ‘missed’ by the services working with the parents – this really shouldn’t be happening in schools! Other services (inc treatment) can tend to focus on adult needs/progress. They may also not hit the thresholds of statutory child protection. ‘Am i teacher or ami a social worker?’ – not totally mutually exclusive. They are in a really good position to help. Not just picking on schools, but anyone who comes into contact with children/familiesThrough the eyes report: ‘schools are the only place children are seen every day, but they often miss the chance to make an early referral’; schools have a good window to see the child every day: if they’re coming in hungry every morning, that’s a good chance to spot the warning signs’Low-level support for children below the thresholds of statutory intervention – school clubs, sports etc, within which children can develop a sense of self-esteem
  • #11 In most cases, the needs of children affected by parental substance use mirror the needs of vulnerable children more generally.
  • #12 Touches on a number of different policies/procedures etc.Drug policies - Should cover more than critical incident scenarios. Give procedures for handling disclosures, identify named staff, identify any local support services for children, define significant harm and child protection thresholds
  • #13 Link workers e.g. Parent Support Advisers