This document summarizes a study comparing static and adaptive nitrogen rate recommendation tools for corn production. A static tool, the Cornell N Calculator (CNC), underestimated achieved yields compared to grower estimates and adaptive tool (Adapt-N). Adapt-N more accurately predicted the economically optimum nitrogen rate (EONR) determined from field trials in New York, with a root mean square error of 28 lbs/ac compared to 55 and 85 lbs/ac for the CNC. Adapt-N also reduced simulated nitrogen leaching and gaseous losses by 26 and 21 lbs/ac on average compared to the CNC. The adaptive approach outperformed the static tool in nitrogen rate recommendations and environmental impact.