Tutorial accompanying the paper of the same name, published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Full paper
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00122.x/abstract
Slide show highlighting how a fully integrated arts program creates an environments for both cognitive and community development.
The kind of programming and learning that is unquantifiable.
We looked at the data. Here’s a breakdown of some key statistics about the nation’s incoming presidents’ addresses, how long they spoke, how well, and more.
My books- Hacking Digital Learning Strategies http://hackingdls.com & Learning to Go https://gum.co/learn2go
Resources at http://shellyterrell.com/emoji
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsLinkedIn
We asked LinkedIn members worldwide about their levels of interest in the latest wave of technology: whether they’re using wearables, and whether they intend to buy self-driving cars and VR headsets as they become available. We asked them too about their attitudes to technology and to the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the devices that they use. The answers were fascinating – and in many cases, surprising.
This SlideShare explores the full results of this study, including detailed market-by-market breakdowns of intention levels for each technology – and how attitudes change with age, location and seniority level. If you’re marketing a tech brand – or planning to use VR and wearables to reach a professional audience – then these are insights you won’t want to miss.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere, promising self-driving cars, medical breakthroughs, and new ways of working. But how do you separate hype from reality? How can your company apply AI to solve real business problems?
Here’s what AI learnings your business should keep in mind for 2017.
Approaches to online quantile estimationData Con LA
Data Con LA 2020
Description
This talk will explore and compare several compact data structures for estimation of quantiles on streams, including a discussion of how they balance accuracy against computational resource efficiency. A new approach providing more flexibility in specifying how computational resources should be expended across the distribution will also be explained. Quantiles (e.g., median, 99th percentile) are fundamental summary statistics of one-dimensional distributions. They are particularly important for SLA-type calculations and characterizing latency distributions, but unlike their simpler counterparts such as the mean and standard deviation, their computation is somewhat more expensive. The increasing importance of stream processing (in observability and other domains) and the impossibility of exact online quantile calculation together motivate the construction of compact data structures for estimation of quantiles on streams. In this talk we will explore and compare several such data structures (e.g., moment-based, KLL sketch, t-digest) with an eye towards how they balance accuracy against resource efficiency, theoretical guarantees, and desirable properties such as mergeability. We will also discuss a recent variation of the t-digest which provides more flexibility in specifying how computational resources should be expended across the distribution. No prior knowledge of the subject is assumed. Some familiarity with the general problem area would be helpful but is not required.
Speaker
Joe Ross, Splunk, Principal Data Scientist
Performance Comparision of Machine Learning AlgorithmsDinusha Dilanka
In this paper Compare the performance of two
classification algorithm. I t is useful to differentiate
algorithms based on computational performance rather
than classification accuracy alone. As although
classification accuracy between the algorithms is similar,
computational performance can differ significantly and it
can affect to the final results. So the objective of this paper
is to perform a comparative analysis of two machine
learning algorithms namely, K Nearest neighbor,
classification and Logistic Regression. In this paper it
was considered a large dataset of 7981 data points and 112
features. Then the performance of the above mentioned
machine learning algorithms are examined. In this paper
the processing time and accuracy of the different machine
learning techniques are being estimated by considering the
collected data set, over a 60% for train and remaining
40% for testing. The paper is organized as follows. In
Section I, introduction and background analysis of the
research is included and in section II, problem statement.
In Section III, our application and data analyze Process,
the testing environment, and the Methodology of our
analysis are being described briefly. Section IV comprises
the results of two algorithms. Finally, the paper concludes
with a discussion of future directions for research by
eliminating the problems existing with the current
research methodology.
Evaluation of a hybrid method for constructing multiple SVM kernelsinfopapers
Dana Simian, Florin Stoica, Evaluation of a hybrid method for constructing multiple SVM kernels, Recent Advances in Computers, Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS International Conference on Computers, Recent Advances in Computer Engineering Series, WSEAS Press, Rodos, Greece, July 23-25, 2009, ISSN: 1790-5109, ISBN: 978-960-474-099-4, pp. 619-623
Lab 2: Classification and Regression Prediction Models, training and testing ...Yao Yao
https://github.com/yaowser/data_mining_group_project
https://www.kaggle.com/c/zillow-prize-1/data
From the Zillow real estate data set of properties in the southern California area, conduct the following data cleaning, data analysis, predictive analysis, and machine learning algorithms:
Lab 2: Classification and Regression Prediction Models, training and testing splits, optimization of K Nearest Neighbors (KD tree), optimization of Random Forest, optimization of Naive Bayes (Gaussian), advantages and model comparisons, feature importance, Feature ranking with recursive feature elimination, Two dimensional Linear Discriminant Analysis
Metabolomic Data Analysis Workshop and Tutorials (2014)Dmitry Grapov
Get more information:
http://imdevsoftware.wordpress.com/2014/10/11/2014-metabolomic-data-analysis-and-visualization-workshop-and-tutorials/
Recently I had the pleasure of teaching statistical and multivariate data analysis and visualization at the annual Summer Sessions in Metabolomics 2014, organized by the NIH West Coast Metabolomics Center.
Similar to last year, I’ve posted all the content (lectures, labs and software) for any one to follow along with at their own pace. I also plan to release videos for all the lectures and labs.
This paper explores the effectiveness of the recently devel- oped surrogate modeling method, the Adaptive Hybrid Functions (AHF), through its application to complex engineered systems design. The AHF is a hybrid surrogate modeling method that seeks to exploit the advantages of each component surrogate. In this paper, the AHF integrates three component surrogate mod- els: (i) the Radial Basis Functions (RBF), (ii) the Extended Ra- dial Basis Functions (E-RBF), and (iii) the Kriging model, by characterizing and evaluating the local measure of accuracy of each model. The AHF is applied to model complex engineer- ing systems and an economic system, namely: (i) wind farm de- sign; (ii) product family design (for universal electric motors); (iii) three-pane window design; and (iv) onshore wind farm cost estimation. We use three differing sampling techniques to inves- tigate their influence on the quality of the resulting surrogates. These sampling techniques are (i) Latin Hypercube Sampling
∗Doctoral Student, Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization Laboratory, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, ASME student member.
†Distinguished Professor and Department Chair. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, ASME Lifetime Fellow. Corresponding author.
‡Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Aerospace and Nuclear En- gineering, ASME member (LHS), (ii) Sobol’s quasirandom sequence, and (iii) Hammers- ley Sequence Sampling (HSS). Cross-validation is used to evalu- ate the accuracy of the resulting surrogate models. As expected, the accuracy of the surrogate model was found to improve with increase in the sample size. We also observed that, the Sobol’s and the LHS sampling techniques performed better in the case of high-dimensional problems, whereas the HSS sampling tech- nique performed better in the case of low-dimensional problems. Overall, the AHF method was observed to provide acceptable- to-high accuracy in representing complex design systems.
This presentation is aimed at fitting a Simple Linear Regression model in a Python program. IDE used is Spyder. Screenshots from a working example are used for demonstration.
AN IMPROVED METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING WELL-TEST INTERPRETATION MODEL BASED ON AG...IAEME Publication
This paper presents an approach based on applying an aggregated predictor formed by multiple versions of a multilayer neural network with a back-propagation optimization algorithm for helping the engineer to get a list of the most appropriate well-test interpretation models for a given set of pressure/ production data. The proposed method consists of three stages: (1) data decorrelation through principal component analysis to reduce the covariance between the variables and the dimension of the input layer in the artificial neural network, (2) bootstrap replicates of the learning set where the data is repeatedly sampled with a random split of the data into train sets and using these as new learning sets, and (3) automatic reservoir model identification through aggregated predictor formed by a plurality vote when predicting a new class. This method is described in detail to ensure successful replication of results. The required training and test dataset were generated by using analytical solution models. In our case, there were used 600 samples: 300 for training, 100 for cross-validation, and 200 for testing. Different network structures were tested during this study to arrive at optimum network design. We notice that the single net methodology always brings about confusion in selecting the correct model even though the training results for the constructed networks are close to 1. We notice also that the principal component analysis is an effective strategy in reducing the number of input features, simplifying the network structure, and lowering the training time of the ANN. The results obtained show that the proposed model provides better performance when predicting new data with a coefficient of correlation approximately equal to 95% Compared to a previous approach 80%, the combination of the PCA and ANN is more stable and determine the more accurate results with lesser computational complexity than was feasible previously. Clearly, the aggregated predictor is more stable and shows less bad classes compared to the previous approach.
Slide show highlighting how a fully integrated arts program creates an environments for both cognitive and community development.
The kind of programming and learning that is unquantifiable.
We looked at the data. Here’s a breakdown of some key statistics about the nation’s incoming presidents’ addresses, how long they spoke, how well, and more.
My books- Hacking Digital Learning Strategies http://hackingdls.com & Learning to Go https://gum.co/learn2go
Resources at http://shellyterrell.com/emoji
Study: The Future of VR, AR and Self-Driving CarsLinkedIn
We asked LinkedIn members worldwide about their levels of interest in the latest wave of technology: whether they’re using wearables, and whether they intend to buy self-driving cars and VR headsets as they become available. We asked them too about their attitudes to technology and to the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the devices that they use. The answers were fascinating – and in many cases, surprising.
This SlideShare explores the full results of this study, including detailed market-by-market breakdowns of intention levels for each technology – and how attitudes change with age, location and seniority level. If you’re marketing a tech brand – or planning to use VR and wearables to reach a professional audience – then these are insights you won’t want to miss.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere, promising self-driving cars, medical breakthroughs, and new ways of working. But how do you separate hype from reality? How can your company apply AI to solve real business problems?
Here’s what AI learnings your business should keep in mind for 2017.
Approaches to online quantile estimationData Con LA
Data Con LA 2020
Description
This talk will explore and compare several compact data structures for estimation of quantiles on streams, including a discussion of how they balance accuracy against computational resource efficiency. A new approach providing more flexibility in specifying how computational resources should be expended across the distribution will also be explained. Quantiles (e.g., median, 99th percentile) are fundamental summary statistics of one-dimensional distributions. They are particularly important for SLA-type calculations and characterizing latency distributions, but unlike their simpler counterparts such as the mean and standard deviation, their computation is somewhat more expensive. The increasing importance of stream processing (in observability and other domains) and the impossibility of exact online quantile calculation together motivate the construction of compact data structures for estimation of quantiles on streams. In this talk we will explore and compare several such data structures (e.g., moment-based, KLL sketch, t-digest) with an eye towards how they balance accuracy against resource efficiency, theoretical guarantees, and desirable properties such as mergeability. We will also discuss a recent variation of the t-digest which provides more flexibility in specifying how computational resources should be expended across the distribution. No prior knowledge of the subject is assumed. Some familiarity with the general problem area would be helpful but is not required.
Speaker
Joe Ross, Splunk, Principal Data Scientist
Performance Comparision of Machine Learning AlgorithmsDinusha Dilanka
In this paper Compare the performance of two
classification algorithm. I t is useful to differentiate
algorithms based on computational performance rather
than classification accuracy alone. As although
classification accuracy between the algorithms is similar,
computational performance can differ significantly and it
can affect to the final results. So the objective of this paper
is to perform a comparative analysis of two machine
learning algorithms namely, K Nearest neighbor,
classification and Logistic Regression. In this paper it
was considered a large dataset of 7981 data points and 112
features. Then the performance of the above mentioned
machine learning algorithms are examined. In this paper
the processing time and accuracy of the different machine
learning techniques are being estimated by considering the
collected data set, over a 60% for train and remaining
40% for testing. The paper is organized as follows. In
Section I, introduction and background analysis of the
research is included and in section II, problem statement.
In Section III, our application and data analyze Process,
the testing environment, and the Methodology of our
analysis are being described briefly. Section IV comprises
the results of two algorithms. Finally, the paper concludes
with a discussion of future directions for research by
eliminating the problems existing with the current
research methodology.
Evaluation of a hybrid method for constructing multiple SVM kernelsinfopapers
Dana Simian, Florin Stoica, Evaluation of a hybrid method for constructing multiple SVM kernels, Recent Advances in Computers, Proceedings of the 13th WSEAS International Conference on Computers, Recent Advances in Computer Engineering Series, WSEAS Press, Rodos, Greece, July 23-25, 2009, ISSN: 1790-5109, ISBN: 978-960-474-099-4, pp. 619-623
Lab 2: Classification and Regression Prediction Models, training and testing ...Yao Yao
https://github.com/yaowser/data_mining_group_project
https://www.kaggle.com/c/zillow-prize-1/data
From the Zillow real estate data set of properties in the southern California area, conduct the following data cleaning, data analysis, predictive analysis, and machine learning algorithms:
Lab 2: Classification and Regression Prediction Models, training and testing splits, optimization of K Nearest Neighbors (KD tree), optimization of Random Forest, optimization of Naive Bayes (Gaussian), advantages and model comparisons, feature importance, Feature ranking with recursive feature elimination, Two dimensional Linear Discriminant Analysis
Metabolomic Data Analysis Workshop and Tutorials (2014)Dmitry Grapov
Get more information:
http://imdevsoftware.wordpress.com/2014/10/11/2014-metabolomic-data-analysis-and-visualization-workshop-and-tutorials/
Recently I had the pleasure of teaching statistical and multivariate data analysis and visualization at the annual Summer Sessions in Metabolomics 2014, organized by the NIH West Coast Metabolomics Center.
Similar to last year, I’ve posted all the content (lectures, labs and software) for any one to follow along with at their own pace. I also plan to release videos for all the lectures and labs.
This paper explores the effectiveness of the recently devel- oped surrogate modeling method, the Adaptive Hybrid Functions (AHF), through its application to complex engineered systems design. The AHF is a hybrid surrogate modeling method that seeks to exploit the advantages of each component surrogate. In this paper, the AHF integrates three component surrogate mod- els: (i) the Radial Basis Functions (RBF), (ii) the Extended Ra- dial Basis Functions (E-RBF), and (iii) the Kriging model, by characterizing and evaluating the local measure of accuracy of each model. The AHF is applied to model complex engineer- ing systems and an economic system, namely: (i) wind farm de- sign; (ii) product family design (for universal electric motors); (iii) three-pane window design; and (iv) onshore wind farm cost estimation. We use three differing sampling techniques to inves- tigate their influence on the quality of the resulting surrogates. These sampling techniques are (i) Latin Hypercube Sampling
∗Doctoral Student, Multidisciplinary Design and Optimization Laboratory, Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering, ASME student member.
†Distinguished Professor and Department Chair. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, ASME Lifetime Fellow. Corresponding author.
‡Associate Professor, Department of Mechanical Aerospace and Nuclear En- gineering, ASME member (LHS), (ii) Sobol’s quasirandom sequence, and (iii) Hammers- ley Sequence Sampling (HSS). Cross-validation is used to evalu- ate the accuracy of the resulting surrogate models. As expected, the accuracy of the surrogate model was found to improve with increase in the sample size. We also observed that, the Sobol’s and the LHS sampling techniques performed better in the case of high-dimensional problems, whereas the HSS sampling tech- nique performed better in the case of low-dimensional problems. Overall, the AHF method was observed to provide acceptable- to-high accuracy in representing complex design systems.
This presentation is aimed at fitting a Simple Linear Regression model in a Python program. IDE used is Spyder. Screenshots from a working example are used for demonstration.
AN IMPROVED METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING WELL-TEST INTERPRETATION MODEL BASED ON AG...IAEME Publication
This paper presents an approach based on applying an aggregated predictor formed by multiple versions of a multilayer neural network with a back-propagation optimization algorithm for helping the engineer to get a list of the most appropriate well-test interpretation models for a given set of pressure/ production data. The proposed method consists of three stages: (1) data decorrelation through principal component analysis to reduce the covariance between the variables and the dimension of the input layer in the artificial neural network, (2) bootstrap replicates of the learning set where the data is repeatedly sampled with a random split of the data into train sets and using these as new learning sets, and (3) automatic reservoir model identification through aggregated predictor formed by a plurality vote when predicting a new class. This method is described in detail to ensure successful replication of results. The required training and test dataset were generated by using analytical solution models. In our case, there were used 600 samples: 300 for training, 100 for cross-validation, and 200 for testing. Different network structures were tested during this study to arrive at optimum network design. We notice that the single net methodology always brings about confusion in selecting the correct model even though the training results for the constructed networks are close to 1. We notice also that the principal component analysis is an effective strategy in reducing the number of input features, simplifying the network structure, and lowering the training time of the ANN. The results obtained show that the proposed model provides better performance when predicting new data with a coefficient of correlation approximately equal to 95% Compared to a previous approach 80%, the combination of the PCA and ANN is more stable and determine the more accurate results with lesser computational complexity than was feasible previously. Clearly, the aggregated predictor is more stable and shows less bad classes compared to the previous approach.
Workshop nwav 47 - LVS - Tool for Quantitative Data AnalysisOlga Scrivner
In the format of hands-on session, this workshop will introduce participants to the Language Variation Suite (LVS), a user-friendly interactive web application built in R. LVS provides access to advanced statistical methods and visualization techniques, such as mixed-effects modeling, conditional and random tree analyses, cluster analysis. These advanced methods enable researchers to handle imbalanced data, measure individual and group variation, estimate significance, and rank variables according to their significance.
A TALE of DATA PATTERN DISCOVERY IN PARALLELJenny Liu
In the era of IoTs and A.I., distributed and parallel computing is embracing big data driven and algorithm focused applications and services. With rapid progress and development on parallel frameworks, algorithms and accelerated computing capacities, it still remains challenging on deliver an efficient and scalable data analysis solution. This talk shares a research experience on data pattern discovery in domain applications. In particular, the research scrutinizes key factors in analysis workflow design and data parallelism improvement on cloud.
Similar to Accounting for uncertainty in species delineation during the analysis of environmental DNA sequence data (20)
3. Therefore, a major imperative in bioinformatics is the development of theoretical and practical approaches for generating biodiversity estimates from DNA sequences
4. This is especially true for taxa that are relatively understudied from a taxonomic perspective (particularly microorganisms and cryptic taxa)
5.
6. Probabilistic diversity estimation with uncertain species boundaries (using GMYC and model averaging) Extension to current approach: (Powell 2011 Methods Ecol Evol) Step 1: Estimate AIC of each model (all single- and multiple-threshold models) and rank based on fit to the data Step 2a: Estimate probabilities that two taxa belong to the same ‘species’ based on the weights associated with each model Step 2b: Estimate sample richness (and variance associated with this estimate) using model averaging Added benefit is that uncertainty in species boundaries can be directly incorporated into the variance associated with diversity estimates Several models fit well
7.
8. The commands to enter are preceded by ‘> ‘, modify these as appropriate for your data; notes are entered after the ‘#’ symbol
11. Downloads and installs ‘igraph’ package Downloads and installs ‘vegan’ package Downloads and installs ‘gtools’ package
12. ‘ape’ and ‘paran’ are also required by the ‘splits’ package ‘splits’ needs to be installed from source, use the following:
13. Read functions into R from source file in the working directory; calls to load required packages are also in source file Show the workspace to check that functions were read correctly into the R workspace
14. Read tree into R; normally would read tree from file in working directory: Newick format: “read.tree(‘treefile.phylo’)” Nexus format: “read.nexus(‘treefile.nex’)” Tree summary to check that tree was read correctly (proper number of tips); the tree needs to be fully dichotomous (number of nodes is one fewer than number of tips)
15. Plot tree; needs to be ultrametric, meaning the distance from root to each tip is the same Can check with ‘is.ultrametric(test.tr)’
16. Plot the accumulation of branches (N) though time; GMYC model used to detect abrupt changes in this accumulation rate
17.
18. The model is fit using each node (first column) as the threshold, from the second to the last branching event (age in second column), and estimates the model likelihood (third column)
19.
20.
21.
22.
23. Procedure starts by placing single threshold at a fixed point in the tree, then introducing additional thresholds closer to/further from node for particular lineages
27. Calculate AICc scores for GMYC models using different thresholds Specify object(s) containing GMYC model output fit using ‘gmyc.edit()’ Output: Model-averaged parameter estimates Other information (e.g., only single/multiple-threshold output objects specified)
28. Generate some summary output: specify object contain model scores calculations; specify cutoff for maximum delta AICc to print model summary to screen Output: Models ranked by increasing delta AICc; ‘step’ used to identify model output in ‘gmyc.edit()’ results
29. Generate some summary output, continued: Output: Models ranked by increasing delta AICc; last column (spilled over in screen output here) indicates Akaike weight given to model in the model-averaged parameter estimates
30. Generate some summary output, continued: Output: Model-averaged parameter estimates (this output does not account for the deltaAICc argument)
31. Estimate number of clusters, entities (clusters + singletons), Shannon diversity; also estimate variance associated with these parameters Specify object contain model scores calculations; specify cutoff for maximum delta AICc of included models Enter ‘y’ to continue, ‘n’ to stop (e.g., if too many models – time limitation)
32. Calculate pairwise probabilities that tips co-occur within GMYC clusters Specify object containing model scores calculations; specify cutoff for maximum delta AICc of included models Enter ‘y’ to continue, ‘n’ to stop (e.g., if too many models – time limitation) delta AICLevel of empirical support 0-2 substantial 4-7 considerably less >10 essentially none (Burnham and Anderson, 2002, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference, page 170)
33. Visual representation of cluster sizes, uncertainty; probabilities range from white (1) to red (0); x- and y-axis labels are arbitrary
34. Plot tree, numbers above branches represent probabilities that all tips nested within node exist in a single GMYC cluster (hard to see in the default plot window)
35. Plot to file, specify dimensions (in inches) to plot over larger area Open connection Plot to file Close connection Show files in working directory
36. File found in working directory; numbers above branches represent probabilities that all tips nested within node exist in a GMYC cluster
37. Finish session: Show all objects in the workspace Quit R; specifying ‘y’ to save image will result in this workspace being restored upon next start, as long as the user first navigates to the current directory before starting R - alternatively: “save.image(‘tutorial.rdata’)” results in image to load from any directory
38. Reload session to demonstrate sample-specific diversity estimates: Show working directory (started here) Show files in working directory; contains a species-sample matrix (‘test.samples.txt’) Reload source file to load necessary packages
41. Model-averaged diversity estimates in each sample For example, ‘est’: Species richness in each sample ‘var’: Variance of richness estimate – can propagate through further analyses
42. Average richness Variance around the mean (including species boundary uncertainty) Variance (underestimated, neglects species boundary uncertainty)
43. TutorialAccounting for uncertainty in species delineation during the analysis of environmental DNA sequence data For more information: jeffpowell2@gmail.com or Jeff.Powell@uws.edu.au