Justine Hinwood and Spencer Reynolds Project report, including slide show (here), dossier and dialogue (separate download) STS390, “Media, war and peace” Spring session, 2007 Science, Technology & Society University of Wollongong
Torture and abu ghraib Prepared by Spenjust Consulting for the OIA Tues 09/10-  11am OUTER
Outline Introduction and why we’re here Outline of concept of torture/ interrogation Background on current situation Legislation and US Stance What this has led theorists to say Suggestions from us
Introduction- Us SPENJUST Consulting
Why are we here today?
TORTURE
Torture- Definition “ Any act by which severe pain or suffering (physical and mental) is intentionally inflicted upon a person.”
Why Torture? Obtain information or a confession Punish Intimidate Incite fear
ABU GHRAIB
Abu Ghraib Prison Started as a prison for Sadaam Taken over by Americans in 2003 Housed inmates that were problematic or security risks
Abu Ghraib Photo Scandal November 2003 Darby Given a CD containing photos January 2004 CD given to CID April 2004 Photos aired on  60 Minutes Major investigation ensued
Some examples of the leaked photos
 
 
 
 
Why did this happen? The main reason seems to be inexperienced soldiers “ A general lack of knowledge, implementation,  and emphasis of basic legal, regulatory, doctrinal and command requirements” The main reason the world knows about it is Darby Concerned soldiers
What was the result? Court case Exceptionally bad publicity Support withdrawn in many detention facilities by groups
Current views on Torture Legislation and US Stance
Geneva Convention Started in 1864 1949 Provided basic minimal protection - should not be subject to physical or mental torture or cruel or degrading corporal punishment Torture unjustifiable under any circumstance US been a party to this since 1955
Violation of other international laws Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment US a signatory The following can not be used to justify torture Exceptional circumstances Order from a superior officer No one can be expelled to another state to be tortured
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) US ratified it in 1992 Article 7 states ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’  Violation of other international laws
Current US stance Signatory to legislation Does this cover terrorists? Repudiation of interrogation techniques to elicit information Adhering to international treatment standards Military Commissions Act
Theories on Torture
Current theories in torture- against Iacopino Suffer unspeakable pain and degradation Does not make individuals or societies safer Often false confessions, victimising the innocent “ Torture will never serve the interests of justice because it undermines our worth and humanity” Roth International law- torture is never permissible
Current theories in torture- PRO Dershowitz Torture is good if done by the right people in the right situations Empower judges to issue ‘torture warrants’  Limit torture to non-lethal means Yoo Constitution grants President unhindered discretion in wartime
our suggestions
Our suggestions- broad As seen from Abu Ghraib, torture can be VERY damaging to a country Torture is also damaging to individuals and a violation of human rights As US is a signatory to international conventions it should follow those or withdraw from the convention
Our Suggestions- OIA Avoid torture Unconstructive Affects involved individuals markedly Is a violation of human rights Gives the US bad reputation Avoid torture warrants Opens pathway for others to copy Where do they stop?
SPENJUST Consulting

Abugharaib Torture

  • 1.
    Justine Hinwood andSpencer Reynolds Project report, including slide show (here), dossier and dialogue (separate download) STS390, “Media, war and peace” Spring session, 2007 Science, Technology & Society University of Wollongong
  • 2.
    Torture and abughraib Prepared by Spenjust Consulting for the OIA Tues 09/10- 11am OUTER
  • 3.
    Outline Introduction andwhy we’re here Outline of concept of torture/ interrogation Background on current situation Legislation and US Stance What this has led theorists to say Suggestions from us
  • 4.
  • 5.
    Why are wehere today?
  • 6.
  • 7.
    Torture- Definition “Any act by which severe pain or suffering (physical and mental) is intentionally inflicted upon a person.”
  • 8.
    Why Torture? Obtaininformation or a confession Punish Intimidate Incite fear
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Abu Ghraib PrisonStarted as a prison for Sadaam Taken over by Americans in 2003 Housed inmates that were problematic or security risks
  • 11.
    Abu Ghraib PhotoScandal November 2003 Darby Given a CD containing photos January 2004 CD given to CID April 2004 Photos aired on 60 Minutes Major investigation ensued
  • 12.
    Some examples ofthe leaked photos
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Why did thishappen? The main reason seems to be inexperienced soldiers “ A general lack of knowledge, implementation, and emphasis of basic legal, regulatory, doctrinal and command requirements” The main reason the world knows about it is Darby Concerned soldiers
  • 18.
    What was theresult? Court case Exceptionally bad publicity Support withdrawn in many detention facilities by groups
  • 19.
    Current views onTorture Legislation and US Stance
  • 20.
    Geneva Convention Startedin 1864 1949 Provided basic minimal protection - should not be subject to physical or mental torture or cruel or degrading corporal punishment Torture unjustifiable under any circumstance US been a party to this since 1955
  • 21.
    Violation of otherinternational laws Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhumane or Degrading Treatment or Punishment US a signatory The following can not be used to justify torture Exceptional circumstances Order from a superior officer No one can be expelled to another state to be tortured
  • 22.
    International Covenant onCivil and Political Rights (ICCPR) US ratified it in 1992 Article 7 states ‘No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment’ Violation of other international laws
  • 23.
    Current US stanceSignatory to legislation Does this cover terrorists? Repudiation of interrogation techniques to elicit information Adhering to international treatment standards Military Commissions Act
  • 24.
  • 25.
    Current theories intorture- against Iacopino Suffer unspeakable pain and degradation Does not make individuals or societies safer Often false confessions, victimising the innocent “ Torture will never serve the interests of justice because it undermines our worth and humanity” Roth International law- torture is never permissible
  • 26.
    Current theories intorture- PRO Dershowitz Torture is good if done by the right people in the right situations Empower judges to issue ‘torture warrants’ Limit torture to non-lethal means Yoo Constitution grants President unhindered discretion in wartime
  • 27.
  • 28.
    Our suggestions- broadAs seen from Abu Ghraib, torture can be VERY damaging to a country Torture is also damaging to individuals and a violation of human rights As US is a signatory to international conventions it should follow those or withdraw from the convention
  • 29.
    Our Suggestions- OIAAvoid torture Unconstructive Affects involved individuals markedly Is a violation of human rights Gives the US bad reputation Avoid torture warrants Opens pathway for others to copy Where do they stop?
  • 30.