The document summarizes Aaron Kendall's presentation on comparing Viking Age and early medieval settlement sites in Iceland and Greenland. It addresses three hypotheses: 1) First settlers brought a "settler kit" that could not be easily replaced; 2) Status differences became blurred without replacements; and 3) Increased trade provided opportunities to replenish goods. Charts show differences in materials found at Icelandic sites over time, with imports increasing. Similar analyses of Greenland sites and comparisons between Iceland and Greenland are discussed to further understand trade routes and cultural exchange.
The Rastafari Movement comes to the Sierra Nevada World Music Festival at the Mendocino Fairgrounds, in Boonville California 95415. So we will look at this movement to better understand Rastas so that we can better minister to them with the love of Jesus Christ.
The Rastafari Movement comes to the Sierra Nevada World Music Festival at the Mendocino Fairgrounds, in Boonville California 95415. So we will look at this movement to better understand Rastas so that we can better minister to them with the love of Jesus Christ.
Alison Keir (Orkney College) Coastal Archaeology, Heritage, and Education for...
Aaron Kendall (CUNY) Connections and Networks in N Atlantic Trade
1. CUNY HERC Open Workshop
New York, 15 October 2012
Viking Age and early medieval trade in the
North Atlantic: Comparison of settlement sites
from Iceland and Greenland
Aaron Kendall
The Graduate Center, City University of New York
3. Three Hypotheses Addressed:
1. First Viking Age settlers in the N. Atlantic brought a
“Settler Kit” which could not be easily renewed.
2. Because everyday artifacts were not easily replaced,
status differences became blurred archaeologically.
3. Increased trade resulting from expanding fish markets
provided the opportunity to replenish household and
elite objects in the Early Medieval Period.
8. Material from Mývatn Sites
100%
90% Misc.
80%
Wool
Wood
70%
Plant
60% Stone
50%
Steatite
Schist
55% 59%
40% 50% Glass
Fe Fe
Fe
30% Copper
Iron
20%
Bone
10%
0%
Hofstadir Sveigakot Hreisheimar
11. Material from Mývatn Sites
100%
90% Misc.
80%
Wool
Wood
70%
Plant
60% Stone
50%
Steatite
Schist
55% 59%
40% 50% Glass
Fe Fe
Fe
30% Copper
Iron
20%
Bone
10%
0%
Hofstadir Sveigakot Hreisheimar
12. Mývatn
Imports
Sveigakot
12
10
Steatite
Percentage
8
6
4 Glass
2
0 Schist
Hofstaðir
8
6
Percentage
4
2
0
AD 950 AD 1050 AD 1150
18. Further Work
• Finish inputting Greenland artifacts into
database
• Incorporate site phasing and temporal changes
in assemblage at each site
• Address wear of whetstones and nails
• Add material from Skutustaðir and Sandwick
• Future comparisons with Faroes, Shetland,
Orkney, and Scandinavian mainland?
• Make completed database accessible on the
Internet