This document provides the midterm review report of the "Surakshit Samudaya II" project implemented by ActionAid Nepal with funding from the European Commission. The project aims to build disaster resilient communities in 3 districts of Nepal. The summary reviews the project's objectives, methodology, findings and recommendations. It finds that the project has strengthened community capacities for disaster risk reduction through community mobilization, training, and small-scale mitigation measures. However, it also notes some areas for improvement, such as further building ownership among local stakeholders and ensuring sustainability of project activities. The review provides recommendations to help the project better achieve its goals in the remaining implementation period.
This document provides an introduction and background on the People's Caravan on Disaster Risk Reduction in Nepal event held on October 13-14, 2009 to mark International Day for Disaster Reduction. The key objectives of the event were to raise public awareness on disaster risk reduction issues in Nepal and obtain commitments from policymakers to enact disaster management policies and institutionalize disaster risk reduction. A steering committee was formed comprising government, UN, and NGO representatives to organize the two-day event, which included a national symposium, rally, exhibition, convention, and meetings with high-level officials. The expected outcomes included a joint declaration committing to disaster management legislation and an increased understanding among communities of their rights and the need for stronger disaster risk
Ain emergency preparedness and response reportDIPECHO Nepal
1. The study assesses Nepal's emergency preparedness and response system focusing on disasters
in 9 districts between 2008-2009.
2. Both qualitative and quantitative data was collected including reviews, workshops, consultations,
and field visits. Focus groups and interviews provided information and concerns.
3. Emergency preparedness mechanisms exist but monitoring and follow up is weak, limiting
effectiveness. Response has been ad hoc without dedicated disaster management teams.
4. Emergency response has been delayed by reliance on inaccurate media reports, bureaucracy,
and poor information flow to affected communities. Relief distribution faced challenges.
5. Policy frameworks establish roles but regional committees are inactive and village-level provisions
are lacking. Response is hind
Dipecho v aan brief update july 09 april 10edmnepal
The document provides an update on the progress of ActionAid Nepal's DIPECHO V project from July 2009 to April 2010. The project worked to build disaster resilience in communities in Banke, Sunsari, and Udayapur districts. Key achievements included forming disaster management committees, providing training to communities and stakeholders, conducting vulnerability assessments, establishing emergency funds, and implementing small-scale mitigation activities like raising tube wells and constructing bio-dykes. The project enhanced community capacity for disaster risk reduction and created an enabling environment for DRR policies through orientations with government officials, NGOs, and parliamentarians.
The document provides an update on the progress of ActionAid Nepal's DIPECHO V project from July to December 2009. It summarizes that:
1) The project has been implementing activities largely on schedule and reaching intended targets to build disaster resilient communities.
2) Key activities included training community members and local stakeholders in disaster preparedness, forming community groups, and identifying small-scale mitigation projects.
3) An initial assessment found communities have enhanced knowledge of risks and capacities, while further advocacy and mitigation work is ongoing.
Dipecho5 news letter 6th edition- april10DIPECHO Nepal
The document discusses advocacy efforts by DIPECHO partners in Nepal to promote disaster risk reduction as a priority. It outlines several joint advocacy activities:
1. Supporting a national symposium and rally on UNISDR day in October 2009 to adopt a 9-point declaration on DRR policy and hand it over to Nepal's president.
2. Supporting an organization to organize an Earthquake Safety Day in January 2010 to raise awareness of earthquake risk in Nepal.
3. Producing a joint documentary focusing on Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management and the Hyogo Framework to advocate for Nepal's commitments under these frameworks.
4. Producing a joint radio program on flood preparedness with
Aan dipecho5 ca sensitization brief reportDIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes sensitization workshops held in Nepal to educate members of the Constitutional Assembly on disaster risk reduction and management. Over four workshops held between February and April 2010, a total of 96 CA members were sensitized. The workshops aimed to raise awareness of DRR issues, encourage stronger DRR policies, and garner support for legislation like the proposed Disaster Management Act of 2009. Participant feedback indicated the workshops were well-received and successful in motivating CA members to address disaster vulnerability and risk reduction.
Aan dipecho5 pva training summary reportDIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes a training on Participatory Vulnerability Analysis (PVA) conducted by ActionAid Nepal for their partner organizations. It provides an overview of the training objectives, methodology, and outcomes. The training aimed to build the capacity of participants to facilitate PVA and disaster risk reduction initiatives in communities. Through various participatory methods over five days, participants learned about PVA principles, tools and processes to understand community vulnerabilities, risks, and ways to mitigate them. The training concluded with field practice and positive participant feedback, helping to achieve the goal of effective project implementation through collaborative PVA application.
Nepal pva workshop report chitwan november 2k5 finalDIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes a participatory vulnerability analysis workshop held in Nepal from November 14-19, 2005. It provides background on vulnerability and disasters in Nepal. It then discusses the principles and process of participatory vulnerability analysis, including community participation, data collection and analysis, and tying the results to decision making. The workshop aimed to help communities better understand their vulnerabilities in order to strengthen disaster preparedness and resilience.
This document provides an introduction and background on the People's Caravan on Disaster Risk Reduction in Nepal event held on October 13-14, 2009 to mark International Day for Disaster Reduction. The key objectives of the event were to raise public awareness on disaster risk reduction issues in Nepal and obtain commitments from policymakers to enact disaster management policies and institutionalize disaster risk reduction. A steering committee was formed comprising government, UN, and NGO representatives to organize the two-day event, which included a national symposium, rally, exhibition, convention, and meetings with high-level officials. The expected outcomes included a joint declaration committing to disaster management legislation and an increased understanding among communities of their rights and the need for stronger disaster risk
Ain emergency preparedness and response reportDIPECHO Nepal
1. The study assesses Nepal's emergency preparedness and response system focusing on disasters
in 9 districts between 2008-2009.
2. Both qualitative and quantitative data was collected including reviews, workshops, consultations,
and field visits. Focus groups and interviews provided information and concerns.
3. Emergency preparedness mechanisms exist but monitoring and follow up is weak, limiting
effectiveness. Response has been ad hoc without dedicated disaster management teams.
4. Emergency response has been delayed by reliance on inaccurate media reports, bureaucracy,
and poor information flow to affected communities. Relief distribution faced challenges.
5. Policy frameworks establish roles but regional committees are inactive and village-level provisions
are lacking. Response is hind
Dipecho v aan brief update july 09 april 10edmnepal
The document provides an update on the progress of ActionAid Nepal's DIPECHO V project from July 2009 to April 2010. The project worked to build disaster resilience in communities in Banke, Sunsari, and Udayapur districts. Key achievements included forming disaster management committees, providing training to communities and stakeholders, conducting vulnerability assessments, establishing emergency funds, and implementing small-scale mitigation activities like raising tube wells and constructing bio-dykes. The project enhanced community capacity for disaster risk reduction and created an enabling environment for DRR policies through orientations with government officials, NGOs, and parliamentarians.
The document provides an update on the progress of ActionAid Nepal's DIPECHO V project from July to December 2009. It summarizes that:
1) The project has been implementing activities largely on schedule and reaching intended targets to build disaster resilient communities.
2) Key activities included training community members and local stakeholders in disaster preparedness, forming community groups, and identifying small-scale mitigation projects.
3) An initial assessment found communities have enhanced knowledge of risks and capacities, while further advocacy and mitigation work is ongoing.
Dipecho5 news letter 6th edition- april10DIPECHO Nepal
The document discusses advocacy efforts by DIPECHO partners in Nepal to promote disaster risk reduction as a priority. It outlines several joint advocacy activities:
1. Supporting a national symposium and rally on UNISDR day in October 2009 to adopt a 9-point declaration on DRR policy and hand it over to Nepal's president.
2. Supporting an organization to organize an Earthquake Safety Day in January 2010 to raise awareness of earthquake risk in Nepal.
3. Producing a joint documentary focusing on Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management and the Hyogo Framework to advocate for Nepal's commitments under these frameworks.
4. Producing a joint radio program on flood preparedness with
Aan dipecho5 ca sensitization brief reportDIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes sensitization workshops held in Nepal to educate members of the Constitutional Assembly on disaster risk reduction and management. Over four workshops held between February and April 2010, a total of 96 CA members were sensitized. The workshops aimed to raise awareness of DRR issues, encourage stronger DRR policies, and garner support for legislation like the proposed Disaster Management Act of 2009. Participant feedback indicated the workshops were well-received and successful in motivating CA members to address disaster vulnerability and risk reduction.
Aan dipecho5 pva training summary reportDIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes a training on Participatory Vulnerability Analysis (PVA) conducted by ActionAid Nepal for their partner organizations. It provides an overview of the training objectives, methodology, and outcomes. The training aimed to build the capacity of participants to facilitate PVA and disaster risk reduction initiatives in communities. Through various participatory methods over five days, participants learned about PVA principles, tools and processes to understand community vulnerabilities, risks, and ways to mitigate them. The training concluded with field practice and positive participant feedback, helping to achieve the goal of effective project implementation through collaborative PVA application.
Nepal pva workshop report chitwan november 2k5 finalDIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes a participatory vulnerability analysis workshop held in Nepal from November 14-19, 2005. It provides background on vulnerability and disasters in Nepal. It then discusses the principles and process of participatory vulnerability analysis, including community participation, data collection and analysis, and tying the results to decision making. The workshop aimed to help communities better understand their vulnerabilities in order to strengthen disaster preparedness and resilience.
This document summarizes articles in an issue of Outreach, a multi-stakeholder magazine on climate change and sustainable development.
1. It leads with an article calling for collaboration as key to ensuring a fair transition to a green economy. National policies and knowledge sharing are emphasized.
2. Another article argues that without dedicated finance, the Rio+20 conference will fail to deliver on aspirations of transitioning to a green economy. It calls for ending fossil fuel subsidies and greening tax systems.
3. A third article discusses green job opportunities in Canada as the country transitions away from its reliance on oil reserves, and highlights examples from Ontario and other provinces of renewable energy policies creating domestic manufacturing and jobs. It argues
This document provides a summary of Nepal's 2013 disaster report. It was published jointly by Nepal's Ministry of Home Affairs and the Disaster Preparedness Network-Nepal. The report documents Nepal's disaster management initiatives in 2012-2013, analyzes disaster trends, and highlights good practices in community-based disaster mitigation. It focuses on participation and inclusion in disaster risk reduction. The report is intended to serve as a reference for stakeholders and help improve disaster management policies, planning, and community resilience in Nepal.
best practice guidelines action research engaging with cald communities july ...Human Rights Commission
This document provides best practice guidelines for agencies and culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities to effectively communicate during and after a disaster. It recommends that agencies get to know CALD communities before a disaster by building relationships based on trust and understanding. Agencies should improve cultural competency, use interpreters, promote diversity in staffing, and properly resource communication with CALD communities. The document is based on research and consultations conducted in Christchurch, New Zealand following destructive earthquakes to understand challenges and ways to enhance communication between agencies and CALD communities during recovery efforts.
NEPAL DISASTER REPORT 2011 Policies, Practices and Lessons tries to become a compendium of understanding, concepts, experiences and lessons of disaster risk management (DRM) and emergency response planning and capacity building in Nepal. It tries to reflect the current status of DRM in Nepal
The CBDRM Training and Learning Circle (TLC) was established in the Philippines in December 2007 to facilitate knowledge sharing between training institutions, practitioners, and organizations regarding community-based disaster risk management. The TLC is supported by organizations like UNDP and works to strengthen CBDRM training and education through various events and forums. These events bring together participants from communities, NGOs, academia and government to discuss challenges and opportunities in disaster research, risk assessment techniques, and ensuring CBDRM is incorporated into university curriculum. The TLC aims to be a support network for CBDRM practitioners and trainers in the Philippines.
This document presents a community resilience framework for Sri Lanka. It was developed through collaboration between the Disaster Management Center and stakeholders. The framework aims to strengthen community resilience by taking a risk-informed approach to development planning. It emphasizes multi-sectoral collaboration and community participation in disaster risk reduction. Key strategies include incorporating resilience-building into all levels of development planning and governance.
This document explores community resilience in times of rapid change. It begins by looking at resilient responses to floods in Cumbria in 2009 and lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. It then discusses sources of inspiration for leading community resilience and the politics of localizing responses. The second part introduces a "compass" framework for community resilience with four dimensions: healthy engaged people, an inclusive culture, a localizing economy within ecological limits, and strong cross-community links. It provides examples of building resilience in these areas and concludes by discussing next steps to continue the discussion.
The document provides instructions for creating a data chart to organize information from sources for a final project. It includes prompts for including details about the setting, location, people, religion, buildings, and other notes. Students are directed to save the data chart to their drive and use tabs to copy and paste additional charts for other categories related to their project. Source citations should be included for each entry.
This flyer advertises a lunchtime conversation with Mark Pryor, the Assistant District Attorney for Travis County and author, to take place on January 29th at 12:25 PM in the Upper School Library. Attendees are asked to bring their lunch, and there will be a raffle for a signed copy of Pryor's novel The Bookseller.
The document discusses the history and current state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine over land rights in the region. It notes that both groups claim historical and religious ties to the land, and that there have been numerous attempts at negotiations and peace agreements over decades but the core issues of borders, settlements, security, and the status of Jerusalem and Palestinian refugees have remained unresolved. The ongoing disputes over land and political control have led to repeated outbreaks of violence and neither side has been willing to make the compromises needed to reach a final peace agreement.
David Dunham, the publisher of Texas Monthly Magazine, will give a presentation and answer questions on February 28th at 12:25 PM in the Upper School Library. Students are invited to bring their lunch and attend. The event will feature David Dunham discussing his role as publisher of Texas Monthly Magazine and taking questions from the audience.
This document discusses how school librarians can help connect students' informal learning experiences in participatory culture to formal education. It mentions librarians participating with teachers to help students learn skills across platforms and media. It also discusses ensuring all students have access to skills for full participation in society. The document contains photos and references collaborating on projects and assessing student work.
St. Andrew's Materials Selection Policy for LibrariesBarb Jansen
The document outlines St. Andrew's Episcopal School's policy for selecting and dealing with challenges to library resources. It states that the school aims to provide students with a wide range of resources representing diverse viewpoints. The professional library staff is responsible for coordinating selection based on criteria like supporting the curriculum and being appropriate for different student groups. The policy also establishes procedures for reconsidering challenged resources, including an informal discussion with library staff and a formal review process with the Head of School.
Searching ebrary requires using the advanced search features to input search terms or subjects into multiple search boxes, as the default search looks broadly across text and key fields. Searching by title, author, or subject will provide the most useful results, and terms can be combined across boxes or limited further by subjects. However, searches may become too specific and only return a single remaining resource.
Dipecho v news letter 4th edition- january10edmnepal
The newsletter discusses mass sensitization activities carried out by DIPECHO partners in Nepal to raise awareness about disaster risk reduction. It provides brief summaries of initiatives by different organizations, including using radio, TV, street dramas and community meetings. The partners aim to disseminate information and influence thinking to build resilience through transforming attitudes and encouraging collective action. The third priority of Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management is to conduct awareness raising and information dissemination to build national and community resilience to disasters.
Dipecho v news letter 6th edition- april10edmnepal
The document discusses advocacy efforts by DIPECHO partners in Nepal to promote disaster risk reduction. It mentions:
1) The partners work together on joint advocacy initiatives such as marking international days like UNISDR day and Earthquake Safety Day to raise awareness and pressure the government to prioritize DRR.
2) They are producing advocacy tools like a documentary and radio programs focusing on Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management and the Hyogo Framework to underline Nepal's DRR commitments.
3) Individual partners like ActionAid, CARE Nepal, Danish Red Cross are also advocating to influence policies and practices at national and local levels to mainstream DRR and ensure vulnerable people's rights are protected in policies
The project has contributed to achieving the priority actions of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) in several ways. It established Disaster Preparedness Committees (DPCs) in six communities to identify risks and develop early warning systems. Financial transparency was maintained through social audits. Emergency funds helped communities conduct preparedness activities. Linking community and village development committee disaster plans helped secure resources. The project identified physical, attitudinal and social risks through vulnerability assessments. Early warning information from the meteorology department was disseminated through local messengers and radio. Simulations helped build knowledge of evacuation procedures.
Dipecho nepal contribution2 hfa final report nov 30 _2_DIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes the achievements of DIPECHO projects in contributing to the Hyogo Framework for Action in Nepal. It finds that the projects helped achieve the five priority actions and three strategic goals of the HFA by strengthening community disaster management institutions, raising awareness of disaster risk reduction, developing early warning systems, and enhancing disaster preparedness and response capacities. However, it also notes gaps that still remain, such as limited coverage, inadequate funding, and a need for better information sharing. It provides recommendations for future initiatives to further promote the goals of the HFA and build resilience in Nepal.
This document presents a draft national strategy for early warning of natural disasters in Nepal. It was submitted to the Ministry of Home Affairs by the Society of Hydrologists and Meteorologists - Nepal. The strategy was developed with input from various governmental and non-governmental organizations. It recognizes Nepal's vulnerability to natural hazards like floods, landslides, and earthquakes due to its rugged terrain. The strategy aims to establish an early warning system that empowers communities to respond effectively to disasters through timely and understandable warnings. It identifies mechanisms, tools, and communication products to strengthen local networks and resilience and fill gaps in local preparedness. The strategy seeks to reduce risks and economic losses from disasters by allowing better protection of lives, property, and
This document provides an evaluation report of the "Surakshit Samudaya: Building Safer Community through Disaster Management" project implemented by ActionAid Nepal with funding from DIPECHO. The evaluation found that the project successfully achieved its objectives of building disaster awareness, empowering communities, and enhancing stakeholder capacity for disaster management. Key accomplishments included establishing functioning disaster management committees, training community members, implementing risk reduction activities, and advocating for policy changes. While some activities like early warning systems faced challenges, overall the project improved disaster preparedness and reduced risks in the communities it served.
This evaluation report summarizes the "Surakshit Samudaya: Building Safer Community through Disaster Management" project implemented by ActionAid Nepal with DIPECHO funding. The project aimed to build safer communities through disaster management initiatives like enhancing awareness, empowering communities, and building stakeholder capacity. It achieved its objectives by establishing 14 Disaster Management Committees, implementing awareness campaigns, training communities and stakeholders in disaster preparedness and risk reduction, and facilitating local risk assessment and action planning. While severe disasters did not occur during the project, trained volunteers were able to provide assistance during flood events. The project helped build knowledge, skills, and local coordination networks to strengthen disaster resilience in the target communities.
This document summarizes articles in an issue of Outreach, a multi-stakeholder magazine on climate change and sustainable development.
1. It leads with an article calling for collaboration as key to ensuring a fair transition to a green economy. National policies and knowledge sharing are emphasized.
2. Another article argues that without dedicated finance, the Rio+20 conference will fail to deliver on aspirations of transitioning to a green economy. It calls for ending fossil fuel subsidies and greening tax systems.
3. A third article discusses green job opportunities in Canada as the country transitions away from its reliance on oil reserves, and highlights examples from Ontario and other provinces of renewable energy policies creating domestic manufacturing and jobs. It argues
This document provides a summary of Nepal's 2013 disaster report. It was published jointly by Nepal's Ministry of Home Affairs and the Disaster Preparedness Network-Nepal. The report documents Nepal's disaster management initiatives in 2012-2013, analyzes disaster trends, and highlights good practices in community-based disaster mitigation. It focuses on participation and inclusion in disaster risk reduction. The report is intended to serve as a reference for stakeholders and help improve disaster management policies, planning, and community resilience in Nepal.
best practice guidelines action research engaging with cald communities july ...Human Rights Commission
This document provides best practice guidelines for agencies and culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities to effectively communicate during and after a disaster. It recommends that agencies get to know CALD communities before a disaster by building relationships based on trust and understanding. Agencies should improve cultural competency, use interpreters, promote diversity in staffing, and properly resource communication with CALD communities. The document is based on research and consultations conducted in Christchurch, New Zealand following destructive earthquakes to understand challenges and ways to enhance communication between agencies and CALD communities during recovery efforts.
NEPAL DISASTER REPORT 2011 Policies, Practices and Lessons tries to become a compendium of understanding, concepts, experiences and lessons of disaster risk management (DRM) and emergency response planning and capacity building in Nepal. It tries to reflect the current status of DRM in Nepal
The CBDRM Training and Learning Circle (TLC) was established in the Philippines in December 2007 to facilitate knowledge sharing between training institutions, practitioners, and organizations regarding community-based disaster risk management. The TLC is supported by organizations like UNDP and works to strengthen CBDRM training and education through various events and forums. These events bring together participants from communities, NGOs, academia and government to discuss challenges and opportunities in disaster research, risk assessment techniques, and ensuring CBDRM is incorporated into university curriculum. The TLC aims to be a support network for CBDRM practitioners and trainers in the Philippines.
This document presents a community resilience framework for Sri Lanka. It was developed through collaboration between the Disaster Management Center and stakeholders. The framework aims to strengthen community resilience by taking a risk-informed approach to development planning. It emphasizes multi-sectoral collaboration and community participation in disaster risk reduction. Key strategies include incorporating resilience-building into all levels of development planning and governance.
This document explores community resilience in times of rapid change. It begins by looking at resilient responses to floods in Cumbria in 2009 and lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina. It then discusses sources of inspiration for leading community resilience and the politics of localizing responses. The second part introduces a "compass" framework for community resilience with four dimensions: healthy engaged people, an inclusive culture, a localizing economy within ecological limits, and strong cross-community links. It provides examples of building resilience in these areas and concludes by discussing next steps to continue the discussion.
The document provides instructions for creating a data chart to organize information from sources for a final project. It includes prompts for including details about the setting, location, people, religion, buildings, and other notes. Students are directed to save the data chart to their drive and use tabs to copy and paste additional charts for other categories related to their project. Source citations should be included for each entry.
This flyer advertises a lunchtime conversation with Mark Pryor, the Assistant District Attorney for Travis County and author, to take place on January 29th at 12:25 PM in the Upper School Library. Attendees are asked to bring their lunch, and there will be a raffle for a signed copy of Pryor's novel The Bookseller.
The document discusses the history and current state of the conflict between Israel and Palestine over land rights in the region. It notes that both groups claim historical and religious ties to the land, and that there have been numerous attempts at negotiations and peace agreements over decades but the core issues of borders, settlements, security, and the status of Jerusalem and Palestinian refugees have remained unresolved. The ongoing disputes over land and political control have led to repeated outbreaks of violence and neither side has been willing to make the compromises needed to reach a final peace agreement.
David Dunham, the publisher of Texas Monthly Magazine, will give a presentation and answer questions on February 28th at 12:25 PM in the Upper School Library. Students are invited to bring their lunch and attend. The event will feature David Dunham discussing his role as publisher of Texas Monthly Magazine and taking questions from the audience.
This document discusses how school librarians can help connect students' informal learning experiences in participatory culture to formal education. It mentions librarians participating with teachers to help students learn skills across platforms and media. It also discusses ensuring all students have access to skills for full participation in society. The document contains photos and references collaborating on projects and assessing student work.
St. Andrew's Materials Selection Policy for LibrariesBarb Jansen
The document outlines St. Andrew's Episcopal School's policy for selecting and dealing with challenges to library resources. It states that the school aims to provide students with a wide range of resources representing diverse viewpoints. The professional library staff is responsible for coordinating selection based on criteria like supporting the curriculum and being appropriate for different student groups. The policy also establishes procedures for reconsidering challenged resources, including an informal discussion with library staff and a formal review process with the Head of School.
Searching ebrary requires using the advanced search features to input search terms or subjects into multiple search boxes, as the default search looks broadly across text and key fields. Searching by title, author, or subject will provide the most useful results, and terms can be combined across boxes or limited further by subjects. However, searches may become too specific and only return a single remaining resource.
Dipecho v news letter 4th edition- january10edmnepal
The newsletter discusses mass sensitization activities carried out by DIPECHO partners in Nepal to raise awareness about disaster risk reduction. It provides brief summaries of initiatives by different organizations, including using radio, TV, street dramas and community meetings. The partners aim to disseminate information and influence thinking to build resilience through transforming attitudes and encouraging collective action. The third priority of Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management is to conduct awareness raising and information dissemination to build national and community resilience to disasters.
Dipecho v news letter 6th edition- april10edmnepal
The document discusses advocacy efforts by DIPECHO partners in Nepal to promote disaster risk reduction. It mentions:
1) The partners work together on joint advocacy initiatives such as marking international days like UNISDR day and Earthquake Safety Day to raise awareness and pressure the government to prioritize DRR.
2) They are producing advocacy tools like a documentary and radio programs focusing on Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management and the Hyogo Framework to underline Nepal's DRR commitments.
3) Individual partners like ActionAid, CARE Nepal, Danish Red Cross are also advocating to influence policies and practices at national and local levels to mainstream DRR and ensure vulnerable people's rights are protected in policies
The project has contributed to achieving the priority actions of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) in several ways. It established Disaster Preparedness Committees (DPCs) in six communities to identify risks and develop early warning systems. Financial transparency was maintained through social audits. Emergency funds helped communities conduct preparedness activities. Linking community and village development committee disaster plans helped secure resources. The project identified physical, attitudinal and social risks through vulnerability assessments. Early warning information from the meteorology department was disseminated through local messengers and radio. Simulations helped build knowledge of evacuation procedures.
Dipecho nepal contribution2 hfa final report nov 30 _2_DIPECHO Nepal
The document summarizes the achievements of DIPECHO projects in contributing to the Hyogo Framework for Action in Nepal. It finds that the projects helped achieve the five priority actions and three strategic goals of the HFA by strengthening community disaster management institutions, raising awareness of disaster risk reduction, developing early warning systems, and enhancing disaster preparedness and response capacities. However, it also notes gaps that still remain, such as limited coverage, inadequate funding, and a need for better information sharing. It provides recommendations for future initiatives to further promote the goals of the HFA and build resilience in Nepal.
This document presents a draft national strategy for early warning of natural disasters in Nepal. It was submitted to the Ministry of Home Affairs by the Society of Hydrologists and Meteorologists - Nepal. The strategy was developed with input from various governmental and non-governmental organizations. It recognizes Nepal's vulnerability to natural hazards like floods, landslides, and earthquakes due to its rugged terrain. The strategy aims to establish an early warning system that empowers communities to respond effectively to disasters through timely and understandable warnings. It identifies mechanisms, tools, and communication products to strengthen local networks and resilience and fill gaps in local preparedness. The strategy seeks to reduce risks and economic losses from disasters by allowing better protection of lives, property, and
This document provides an evaluation report of the "Surakshit Samudaya: Building Safer Community through Disaster Management" project implemented by ActionAid Nepal with funding from DIPECHO. The evaluation found that the project successfully achieved its objectives of building disaster awareness, empowering communities, and enhancing stakeholder capacity for disaster management. Key accomplishments included establishing functioning disaster management committees, training community members, implementing risk reduction activities, and advocating for policy changes. While some activities like early warning systems faced challenges, overall the project improved disaster preparedness and reduced risks in the communities it served.
This evaluation report summarizes the "Surakshit Samudaya: Building Safer Community through Disaster Management" project implemented by ActionAid Nepal with DIPECHO funding. The project aimed to build safer communities through disaster management initiatives like enhancing awareness, empowering communities, and building stakeholder capacity. It achieved its objectives by establishing 14 Disaster Management Committees, implementing awareness campaigns, training communities and stakeholders in disaster preparedness and risk reduction, and facilitating local risk assessment and action planning. While severe disasters did not occur during the project, trained volunteers were able to provide assistance during flood events. The project helped build knowledge, skills, and local coordination networks to strengthen disaster resilience in the target communities.
The document discusses Post Disaster Needs Assessments (PDNAs) that have been conducted in the Asia-Pacific region following disasters since 2005. It provides an overview of the 21 PDNAs conducted in the region, the evolution of the PDNA methodology, key actors involved in PDNAs, and strategic results of international cooperation on PDNAs. PDNAs are led by national governments and involve international partners to assess recovery needs, develop recovery strategies, and help mobilize resources following disasters.
This document outlines five flagship disaster risk reduction programs proposed by the Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium for Nepal. The programs are: 1) Making schools and hospitals earthquake resilient through structural improvements and safety planning. 2) Enhancing emergency preparedness and response capacity at central and district levels. 3) Improving flood management in the Koshi River basin. 4) Implementing integrated community-based disaster risk reduction. 5) Providing policy and institutional support for disaster risk management. The estimated budget for these programs is $131.32 million. Key activities proposed include vulnerability assessments, retrofitting buildings, land use planning, emergency response training, stockpiling relief supplies, and developing disaster response plans.
The document provides an introduction to the National Disaster Risk Reduction Centre Nepal (NDRC Nepal). It summarizes that NDRC Nepal was established in 2003 and registered in 2007 with a vision of a resilient society. It works in disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, and building resilient livelihoods across Nepal. The document outlines NDRC Nepal's geographical coverage, key engagement areas, projects, strengths in areas like capacity building and policy advocacy, publications, and development partners both within and outside of Nepal.
The document summarizes the key discussions and outcomes from the International Symposium on Integrated Disaster Risk Governance held in Beijing, China in May 2014. Over 120 participants from various countries and organizations discussed challenges in disaster risk reduction and recommendations for the post-2015 framework. Main points included emphasizing climate change adaptation, rethinking government roles in coordination and decentralization, and promoting effective science and technology in DRR. Suggestions for the new framework focused on integrating climate and DRR efforts, strengthening multi-level governance, and establishing global partnerships for addressing large-scale disaster risks.
5th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2014 Integrative Risk Management - The role of science, technology & practice 24-28 August 2014 in Davos, Switzerland
The document discusses the introduction of the Incident Command System (ICS) into disaster management in India. It describes the ICS structure at the district, state and national levels. It also outlines initiatives to institutionalize ICS through dedicated training centers, certification programs, and publications. Examples are provided of ICS implementation during the Vadodara floods in 2005 and the response to the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu.
Ifrc south east asia vca guidelines in englishCSRU
The document provides guidance on conducting vulnerability and capacity assessments (VCAs) for Red Cross and Red Crescent organizations. It outlines a 12-step process for VCAs that moves from initial planning through investigation, analysis, and community action planning. Key steps include sensitizing leadership and communities, establishing a management structure, setting objectives, planning the assessment, conducting investigative tools with communities, analyzing and sharing findings, and supporting communities to implement actions to reduce risks. The guidance emphasizes community participation, integrating VCAs into longer-term programming, and addressing multiple hazards and vulnerabilities to build community resilience.
This document discusses clean energy access for basic needs in South Asia. It provides data on per capita energy use and electricity consumption in countries in the region from 1990 to 2008. It then describes a project using Participatory Disaster Risk Sensitive Land Use Planning (DRSLUP) to reduce flood risks in Sri Lanka. The DRSLUP process engaged stakeholders to map hazards, assess vulnerability, and develop land use plans. Risk reduction measures included relocating households, improved drainage, and diversifying livelihoods. The objectives of replicating DRSLUP in SAARC countries are to build capacity for disaster risk reduction, reduce impacts of disasters, and share lessons learned across the region.
The document provides context about a cost-benefit analysis conducted for a disaster risk reduction project in Kailali, Nepal. It describes the project, called the Kailali Disaster Risk Reduction Initiative (KDRRI), which was implemented from 2007-2009 in communities vulnerable to flooding. The analysis had two goals: 1) to assess the cost-effectiveness of the KDRRI project and 2) to create a generalizable methodology for evaluating community-based disaster risk reduction projects. Data was collected through surveys and interviews and analyzed using a mathematical model. The analysis found benefit-cost ratios greater than one, indicating the economic benefits of the project exceeded the costs. Specifically, the ratio was estimated to be 3.49, meaning
The document provides an evaluation report of the Khammam Disaster Mitigation and Preparedness Project implemented from 2003 to 2008 in Khammam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. The project aimed to help vulnerable communities develop flood management plans. Key activities included forming Disaster Management Committees and a task force in 9 villages, providing training, conducting vulnerability assessments, developing contingency plans, installing raised hand pumps, and testing alternative cropping. The evaluation assessed project impact, socioeconomic changes, and the capacity of the formed Disaster Management Society to sustain project efforts. It found that activities contributed to lasting disaster preparedness improvements and changes in livelihoods.
The Dipecho Project aimed to strengthen disaster resilience in Nepal through community-based preparedness initiatives. The project worked in 3 districts over 2 years with a budget of €377,095. It trained over 13,000 community members on first aid, search and rescue, and establishing early warning systems. The project also helped build emergency infrastructure like embankments and retrofitted schools and hospitals to be disaster-resistant. The goal was to enhance communities' ability to reduce disaster impacts through collective action and create an enabling environment with supportive DRR policies.
The Asian Disaster Preparedness Center is an NGO working to prepare communities at risk in Asia to help them deal with disasters and emergencies. Find out about our projects and programs in Disaster Risk Reduction.
The document summarizes a review meeting of the Surakshit Samudaya II project, which aims to build disaster-resilient communities in Nepal. Key highlights from the meeting include:
1) Participants discussed progress against project targets and outcomes, including case studies of impact on community lives.
2) Sessions focused on assessing changes in disaster awareness, preparedness, and response at family and community levels.
3) The meeting also provided an introduction to the Hyogo Framework for Action and how to further integrate it into project activities.
4) Next steps include finalizing work plans for the remaining period to accomplish objectives and building linkages between disaster committees and local governments.
The document summarizes a review meeting of the Surakshit Samudaya II project, which aims to build disaster-resilient communities in Nepal. Key highlights from the meeting include:
1) Participants discussed progress against project targets and outcomes, including case studies of impact on community lives.
2) Sessions focused on assessing changes in disaster awareness, preparedness, and response at family and community levels.
3) The meeting also provided an introduction to the Hyogo Framework for Action and how to further integrate it into project activities.
4) Next steps include finalizing work plans for the remaining period to accomplish objectives and building linkages between disaster committees and local governments.
The project successfully built community resilience to disasters in Nepal through various activities. It established 31 REFLECT circles with over 500 members to educate communities on vulnerabilities, disaster preparedness, and rights. It also formed 19 disaster management committees led by community members to regularly address disaster risks. The project enhanced awareness, prepared communities by training volunteers and establishing early warning systems. It mobilized funds for small-scale mitigation like constructing bio-dykes and tube wells to protect vulnerable communities from floods. Overall, the project achieved its goals of strengthening community capacity and creating an enabling environment for disaster risk reduction.
Dipecho v news letter 5th edition- march10edmnepal
The document discusses capacity building efforts for disaster risk reduction in Nepal. It describes several organizations' projects that focus on building the capacities of communities, local governments, and other stakeholders. Key points:
- Action Aid's project enhances knowledge and skills through trainings, develops community disaster management committees, orients local leaders on disaster risk reduction, and advocates for stronger policies.
- CARE's project builds communities' capacities for risk reduction through its SAMADHAN project.
- Several other organizations like Danish Red Cross, Handicap International, Mercy Corps, etc. also undertake capacity building initiatives through community trainings, strengthening local systems, and scaling up early warning systems.
Dipecho v news letter 3rd edition- nov 2009edmnepal
The document summarizes events in Nepal for International Day for Disaster Risk Reduction in October-November 2009. It describes a two-day symposium and people's rally coordinated by DIPECHO partners that culminated in the demand for an immediate disaster risk reduction and management policy in Nepal. Key events included a symposium where affected community leaders shared experiences, a convention where a large crowd demanded a DRR policy, and an exhibition illustrating DRR projects. The people's declaration calling for a DRR policy framework was handed to the President of Nepal.
Dipecho v news letter 2nd edition- oct 09 aaedmnepal
The document discusses community mobilization approaches used by various organizations working on disaster risk reduction in Nepal. It provides examples of how organizations are mobilizing communities in inclusive and participatory ways to assess risks, develop disaster preparedness plans, and build local capacity and leadership. Key approaches discussed include forming inclusive disaster management committees, conducting vulnerability and capacity assessments, developing community disaster preparedness and response plans, providing trainings, and using methods like street dramas and mock drills to raise awareness. The goal is to empower communities to identify and address their own disaster risks through collective action.
Dipecho v combined national launch press releaseedmnepal
The document summarizes the launch of disaster risk reduction projects in Nepal funded by the European Commission's Humanitarian Aid department. The Minister of State for Home Affairs said the government is committed to strengthening disaster risk reduction policies to protect vulnerable people. The 3.1 million euro projects aim to build the capacities of local communities to reduce the impacts of disasters on lives and livelihoods. They will train over 3,000 youth in emergency response skills and form task forces for disaster response. The projects also seek to establish early warning systems and small-scale mitigation efforts to strengthen national disaster management.
The National Symposium on DRR Policy Framework in Nepal had the following key outcomes:
1. Over 165 participants attended, mostly representatives of affected communities, to share testimonies and discuss developing a strong DRR policy framework.
2. The Secretary of the Ministry of Home Affairs committed to revising the Disaster Management Act and Policy according to the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management and enacting them as soon as possible.
3. Presentations were given on the disaster scenario in Nepal, developments in DRR policy and framework, and how communities are disproportionately affected. This informed discussions on developing a people-centered DRR policy framework.
4. The discussions resulted in a joint
Dipecho v aan vdc secretary drr orientation workshop reportedmnepal
The document summarizes an orientation workshop held by ActionAid Nepal for Village Development Committee (VDC) Secretaries on mainstreaming disaster risk reduction (DRR) into local development work. Over three workshops held in June-July 2010, 161 VDC Secretaries and local officials were introduced to DRR concepts and Nepal's National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management. Participants learned how to incorporate DRR into local planning and budgets based on Ministry of Local Development guidelines. An evaluation found the workshops helped the VDC Secretaries understand DRR and commit to revising plans and budgets to prioritize DRR activities.
Dipecho v aan reflect tot report_detail_sept_arpedmnepal
The document summarizes a training report on building disaster-resilient communities in Nepal through REFLECT methodology. The 8-day training was organized by ActionAid Nepal and aimed to develop facilitators to initiate REFLECT circles focused on disaster risk reduction. It used highly participatory methods like role plays, games, group work and documentaries. Participants evaluated the training as effective in providing clear instruction on REFLECT tools and concepts. However, some noted it could have benefited from more time on topics and opportunities to visit project sites. The conclusion recommends continued support from partner organizations to effectively apply the learning from the training on the ground.
Dipecho v aan reflect refresher brief report dipechoedmnepal
The document summarizes a 3-day refresher training for REFLECT facilitators in Nepal. 15 facilitators from partner organizations participated in the training, which aimed to strengthen their skills in using participatory tools like PVA to facilitate community discussions on disaster risk reduction. Methods like games, role plays and group activities helped boost the facilitators' confidence and teach them how to apply lessons from PVAs and address climate change impacts. The training also focused on developing the facilitators' leadership and motivational skills to empower community members. Overall, the facilitators learned how to better utilize information from PVAs and other tools when leading discussion circles on building disaster resilience.
Dipecho v aan project orientation workshop summary reportedmnepal
The document summarizes a project orientation workshop held in July 2009 in Chitwan, Nepal. The workshop aimed to orient partners on the DIPECHO funded project "Surakshit samudaya II: Building disaster-resilient communities, Nepal". Over three days, project objectives, activities, timelines, and implementation plans were discussed in detail. Partners finalized work plans and understanding of mainstreaming disability into disaster risk reduction efforts. The workshop also helped establish collaboration between project partners and set monitoring and reporting procedures.
Dipecho v aan hfa drr orientation brief reportedmnepal
This document provides an orientation report on workshops held in Nepal to raise awareness of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR). It summarizes:
1) ActionAid Nepal held four workshops in two districts to sensitize government officials, NGO leaders, politicians, and journalists on HFA and mainstreaming DRR.
2) The workshops presented on DRR concepts, HFA priorities, Nepal's disaster context, and ActionAid's DIPECHO project. Evaluations found the workshops effectively increased understanding of DRR and the need for stronger policies.
3) Over 170 people participated across the workshops. Evaluations indicated increased awareness of DRR and support for integrating it
(1) The document summarizes the first review meeting of an ActionAid Nepal disaster risk reduction project funded by the European Commission. (2) It provides an overview of the project goals, activities undertaken in the first 5 months, and key discussions at the meeting including reviewing project performance and management, collecting stories of impact, and planning next steps. (3) The meeting helped enhance teamwork, identify challenges, and adjust work plans and targets for the remaining project period with the goal of further building disaster resilience in target communities.
Dipecho v aan drr tool kit launching brief reportedmnepal
The DRR Toolkit for Constituent Assembly members of Nepal was launched on February 24, 2010. The toolkit was developed through a collaborative effort between various stakeholders to inform and sensitize policymakers on disaster risk reduction. It contains fact sheets on disasters in Nepal, the National Strategy for Disaster Risk Management, and other key information. Over 1,000 copies of the toolkit were distributed to assembly members, government officials, and other stakeholders with the goal of strengthening Nepal's legal and policy framework for disaster management and protecting development progress. The launching event was well-attended and key speakers emphasized the importance of coordinated action and long-term planning on disaster risk reduction issues.
Dipecho v aan article for capacity development aanedmnepal
The document summarizes the capacity building activities of the Surakshit Samudaya II project in Nepal, which aims to build community resilience to disasters. Key activities included assessing communities' knowledge of disaster preparedness, hazard mapping, training over 150 disaster management committee members and volunteers, first aid training for 48 young volunteers, and orienting 171 government authorities on disaster risk reduction. The capacity building efforts have empowered community members to advocate for their disaster-related rights and needs.
Anita Sada is an active member of the Disaster Management Committee in her village in Nepal. Through training from the DIPECHO project, she educates community members on disaster preparedness and response. During floods, she helped rescue and support vulnerable people, especially women and girls. Anita believes the project has strengthened community capacity and organization, and that the committees will continue their work even after project support ends by demanding resources from local authorities.
This document summarizes a Training of Trainers workshop held in Nepal to teach participants how to facilitate REFLECT (Regenerated Freirean Literacy through Empowering Community Techniques) circles to build disaster resilient communities. The 8-day training had 22 participants and aimed to empower them to educate communities on disaster risk reduction and rights using REFLECT's participatory methodology. Key topics covered included REFLECT concepts and processes, education rights, women's rights, and mainstreaming people with disabilities in disaster management. Evaluations found the training achieved its goals of enabling capable facilitators to conduct REFLECT circles and discussions on disaster issues in their areas.
The document summarizes a training report on Participatory Vulnerability Analysis (PVA) conducted for staff of ActionAid and Practical Action involved in a disaster risk reduction project funded by DIPECHO in Nepal. Over five days, the training aimed to build the capacity of participants to facilitate PVA in communities to understand vulnerabilities, their causes and effects, and develop action plans to reduce risks. Methods included lectures, group work, field visits and practicing tools like hazard mapping. Participants felt the training effectively achieved its goals of enhancing their skills in participatory approaches to disaster risk reduction.
The document provides an update on the progress of ActionAid Nepal's DIPECHO project from July-August 2009. Key updates include:
1) All staff positions for ActionAid Nepal and four partner organizations were filled and an orientation workshop was held.
2) The national launch of the DIPECHO V project was held in August 2009 with over 80 participants attending.
3) Project launches were held in the two project districts of Banke and Sunsari.
4) Capacity building trainings were provided to project team members, including REFLECT and PVA trainings.
5) Community mobilization and group discussions with communities have begun in project areas.
This document provides information on disaster preparedness for the month of April. It lists possible disasters such as floods, landslides, thunderstorms, and hot winds. It also provides tips for preparedness including protecting and planting forests to control floods, clearing debris from drains, and avoiding flood-prone areas. The calendar aims to increase awareness of disasters and preparedness measures.
This document provides a summary of activities and achievements of the DIPECHO Project "Surakshit Samudaya II" from July 2009 to February 2010. Key achievements include:
1) Training community members to enhance disaster preparedness capacity and form disaster management committees and REFLECT circles in target communities.
2) Advocacy efforts to influence national and local DRR policies, including launching the project, celebrating international days, and developing a DRR policy toolkit.
3) Increasing awareness of disaster preparedness methods through community vulnerability assessments, knowledge surveys, and radio programs.
4) Initiating small-scale mitigation projects like retrofitted buildings and bio-dikes with community and government support.
1. Surakshit Samudaya II:
Building Community Resilience to disaster
DIPECHO V Project Implemented by ActionAid Nepal
MIDTERM REVIEW REPORT
Submitted to:
ActionAid Nepal
Submitted by:
Nahakul Thapa
Team Leader – (Review Team)
May 2010
1
2. List of abbreviations
DRR Disaster risk reduction
AAN ActionAid Nepal
HFA Hyogo Framework for Action
PVA Participatory vulnerability analysis
DMC Disaster management committees
SMC School management committees
NSET National Society for Earthquake Technologies
MoHA Ministry of Home Affairs
MoE Ministry of Education
CBDRM Community‐based disaster risk management
DAO District Administration office
DDC District Development Committee
DEO District Education Office
IEC Information education and communication
VDC Village development committees
CA Constituent Assembly
PTA Parents teachers association
2
3. Table of Contents: Page
1. Cover Page 1
2. Abbreviations 2
3. Background 4
4. Objectives of the mid term Review 5
5. methodology 6
6. Review Team 6
7. Executive Summary 7‐8
8. Major findings / observations of the Review 9‐15
9. Recommendations 16‐17
10. Annex ( MTR TOR) 18‐25
3
4. Background
Action Aid Nepal has received funding support from European Commission through its Humanitarian
Aid department (under DIPECHO V Action Plan for South Asia) to implement a 15 month project
titled “Surakshit Samudaya II: Building Disaster Resilient Communities, Nepal”. The project will be
implemented in three districts of Nepal (Banke, Sunsari and Udayapur) in association with AAN local
partners, directly covering nearly 13,000 people in 7 municipal and 5 village development
committees. This includes refresher activities in 8 wards covered under the DIPECHO IV project. The
project is co‐financed by Australian Government – AUSAID. ActionAid Nepal is implementing
DIPECHO project for consecutive third term now, having successfully completed two previous cycles
under DIPECHO III (2006‐07) as well as DIPECHO IV (2007‐09).
The specific objective of the project is to strengthen capacities of community and local institutions
for reducing impact of disasters and ensuring rights of disaster vulnerable people
The key components of the project includes community mobilization and strengthening of
leadership through REFLECT and participatory processes, awareness generation, capacity building,
skill enhancement, model small scale mitigation measures and networking, to be implemented
based on principles and values of participation, transparency and accountability. National advocacy
on DRR/HFA is one of the key components of the project to ensure a sound DRR policy framework.
Project Objective
To strengthen capacities of community and local institutions for reducing impact of disasters and
ensuring rights of disaster vulnerable people
Expected Results and Activities
Result 1:
Capacity of target communities is enhanced to reduce impact of disasters through collective local
actions
Activities to achieve Result 1:
1. To mobilize the community and strengthen grassroots institutions:
Formation and continuation of 18 REFLECT circles and DMCs (8 old from DIPECHO IV),
periodic meetings of REFLECT circles and DMCs; development of community level action
plans on DRR
2. To train DMC members and community volunteers on preparedness and emergency response:
Training on CBDRR for 160 people including DMC members, volunteers, teachers and
students; training to 150 volunteers on First Aid, Light Search and Rescue and Emergency
Response; Training to 48 staff and volunteers on Participatory Vulnerability Analysis;
REFLECT ToT to 24 persons
3. To equip communities with disaster management materials, fund and Early Warning Systems:
Establish disaster rescue and relief kit including for food and water security during disasters;
establishment of emergency relief fund within the 10 target communities; training on EWS
to 60 volunteers; workshop on EWS with different stakeholders for 60 persons from
government and community and establishment of CBEWS with support from Practical Action
Result 2:
Enabling environment created through appropriate DRR policies and plans
4
5. Activities to achieve Result 2:
1. Form and strengthen networking of DMCs and stakeholders in district level
Form and strengthen district level networking of DMCs and stakeholders; organize network
meetings, exposure visit of DMC members to other areas within Nepal
2. Train government officers and NGO leaders on DRR/HFA
Training to 60 government officers and 60 NGOs on DRR/HFA
3. Advocate towards national policy framework on disaster risk reduction
Sensitize 150 CA members on DRR/HFA; advocate adoption of national strategy by CA;
convention of vulnerable people on ISDR day, celebration of EQSD, ISDR day etc; training to
30 journalists on DRR; grassroots dissemination of information related to DRR/HFA
Result 3:
Target stakeholders demonstrate increased awareness on disaster preparedness methods at family
and community level
Activities to Achieve Result 3:
1. Participatory Vulnerability Analysis
Conduct PVA through 30 field applications and mapping at various stages in project areas
2. Mass awareness raising
Print and distribute IEC materials like posters, brochures, leaflets etc.; broadcast messages
through FM radio; organize 60 street theatre shows and 60 DRR video shows in the
community
Result 4:
Small scale mitigation measures with government and local support contribute to vulnerability
reduction
Activities to achieve Result 4:
Retrofitting work: Retrofit 2 school buildings and one hospital building as pilot initiatives
Embankment protection in two locations (bio‐dyke, green belt) of approximately 200 mtrs
Elevate 20 handmpumps in two districts to make them disaster proof
Overall Objective of Mid Term Review (MTR)
The broad objective of the MTR is to study and analyse the project progress towards achieving the
set objectives and recommend ways and methods of improving quality and efficiency of project
implementation.
The specific purpose of the MTR were
• Study and analyse the project processes to measure the extent of its progress towards achieving
the set objectives and anticipated results including sustenance of the results of the project, (vis‐
a‐vis indicators mentioned in the log frame).
• Analyse the relevance of the process and approach of the project to achieve set objectives and
anticipated results
• Study and analyse the project management and monitoring tools and its relevance in achieving
the set objectives and anticipated results
• Recommend course corrections, in terms of processes and actions so as to improve the overall
quality and efficiency of the project to achieve the set objectives and anticipated results
To analyse the project outcome in terms of empowerment, particularly with respect to building
capacities of women and other differentially vulnerable groups to participate and contribute to
the decision making process
To review the management and implementation processes adopted by the project
5
6. To analyse the level of ownership and receptiveness of the communities and their participation
in the implementation processes
To review and analyse the contribution of the project to ActionAid Nepal’s core strategy on
human security, emergency and disaster management in line with the revised CSP III and to
ActionAid International HST/IECT strategy
To review and suggest some of the key learning and practises that have potential for wider
application and replication in similar approaches elsewhere, if any
Methodology
In order to develop ownership and ensure the involvement and interest of the stakeholders for
sustainable changes and future developments, the assessment was conducted in a participatory
way, involving AA team along with representative from the ActionAid Australia and the Government
of Nepal, project team, partner staff, consultants, beneficiaries, and other people or institutions
directly or indirectly involved in development and implementation of the project.
The following methods were used:
» Review of the project documentation: A number reports, original proposal as well as interim
reports were reviewed. Various periodic communication bulletins and reports were available.
These sources will be a base on the reference of the project, which helped the evaluator(s) to
understand the project as well as summarise the achievements.
» Interview of the key staffs of the projects: Individual interview of ActionAid Nepal, partners,
government officials and other key stakeholders involved.
» Participatory group exercise: participatory group exercise with the project’s key stakeholders
(different disaster management committees, National and International NGOs, government
officials, DIPECHO partners in Nepal) to review achievements, approaches and potentials.
» Community Assessment: participatory methodologies e.g. focus group discussion, interview,
case studies and other tools were used community assessment.
The Mid‐Term Review was conducted over four days. The team visited the AAN office and met
DIPECHO partners in Kathmandu, and met with partners and participating communities in Banke and
Sunsari districts. The team met 5 REFLECT circles and Disaster Management Committees, and visited
another village where the project is active. Baseline data revealed through the Participatory
Vulnerability Analyses (PVA) and Knowledge, Attitude, Practice (KAP) studies conducted at project
outset were not reviewed. (It is understood that this information will be reviewed as part of the end
of project evaluation). Given time constraints, the review team focused on assessing broad
directions without conducting a formal survey or collecting qualitative data. Observations are
therefore qualitative and generalised from a relatively small sample, and should be viewed in that
light. The detailed MTR schedule is attached.
Mid Term Review Team
The MTR team consisted of the following members:
• Nahakul Thapa, National Coordinator of the DRR through Schools Project, ActionAid Nepal as the
Team Leader
• Grace Nicholas, Program Coordinator, ActionAid Australia
• Mr. Thir Bahadur GC, Under Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of Nepal
The team was accompanied by the project team members to the field.
6
7. Executive Summary
The over all implementation of the DIPECHO V project, co‐funded by AusAID, is on track and
contributing to the four expected results and then to the project objective. There are three levels of
distinct achievements. The first level is at local level where the formation of REFLECT circles and
Disaster Management Committees with community based disaster preparedness plans has assisted
in strengthening communities preparedness for future disasters. The communities are being
mobilised through REFLECT, and Participatory Vulnerability Analyses (PVA).
These processes have assisted communities to analyze their vulnerabilities and take pro active
actions to mitigate the impacts of disasters on them. Thus the grass root institutions have been
developed and strengthened. The various training activities like Community Based Disaster Risk
Reduction (CBDRR), First Aid and Light Search and Rescue (LSR) has contributed to strengthening the
capacities of local communities visited. As a result of the capacities built up by the project, the
communities are now more confident that they have reduced the risks of disasters at community
level. As per the project plan, DMCs are supposed to be equipped with disaster management
materials and community fund. The community funds have been functional in two communities. The
introduction of siren, elevating low lying roads and building bio dykes is also a strategy to make
communities safer. The level of awareness about disaster among communities is very high in almost
all communities. The household level preparedness is evident with people found placing their
valuables at a higher and safe place inside homes. Important documents, jewels, and cash are kept
safe in a box and put in second story (platform). The MTR did not assess baseline data and a certain
level of pre‐existing awareness is to be expected since the same disasters recur annually, however
several community groups interviewed stated that they believed the project had assisted in
strengthening their awareness and preparedness.
Similarly the construction of culverts, schools, and raised hand pumps are strategies to make the
community safer. The introduction of fistful rice campaign has enabled two of the communities to
create an emergency fund. Other villages visited were yet to start the campaign.
Both women and men from participating communities reported that women have been more vocal,
have started coming out of their homes to attend the discussions around social issues including
disasters. The REFLECT circles and other training activities has contributed to this change. Now
women in the communities feel that unlike earlier their male partners have been more supportive to
them. There is availability of trained volunteers at community level and these trained volunteers are
willing to offer any help to the victims of any disaster any time voluntarily.
The Disaster Management Committees (DMC) have started accessing and mobilizing local
government funds and are having better linkages with local government structure which further
strengthens the possibility of these DMC’s sustainability and better collaborative initiatives in future
after the project phases out.
There are a few concerns at local level. Though the communities have started to promote household
level preparedness, like using safe and higher place to store their valuables, raise the plinth of their
food grain storage so they can make both their valuables and food grain safe from flood, but there
are still concerns about translating the knowledge and skills of communities into actions.
Compared to the level of knowledge and awareness on and around disaster among communities,
very few actions have been taken. For example the community people know that the need to go to a
higher and safe place during flood but they have not identified such safe place and located it.
Likewise there are some concerns regarding social mobilization especially in Banke district. One
7
8. community in particular was found divided. It was felt that the lack of full participation of all sections
of the society during vulnerability analysis and planning process has resulted in such conflicts. This
conflict needs to be resolved immediately taking take extra measures.
The second level of achievement is evident at district level. It is more with the partners’ level. The
partners are capable of implementing the project with effective social mobilization. The partners are
visible at district level, their involvement and initiatives are well recognised by the government and
other non governmental organisation.
The partners are bridging between our locally formed institutions like the DMCs and district level
government and other networks. Because of the various disaster risk reduction initiatives carried out
by the disaster management committees formed under the DIPECHO‐AusAID project, the partners
are showcasing the examples and making their presence at district level DRR initiative stronger and
vibrant. The DIPECHO‐AusAID partner in Sunsari is either leading district level initiatives or becoming
integral part of it. These partners have been influential in the process of decision‐making for the
district level DRR initiatives. For example the proposal of UPCA in Sunsari that the victims of disaster
be in the District Disaster Relief Committee has been positively taken by the District Administration
Office which in fact leads the committee.
Third level of achievement can be seen at national level. The project seems quite successful in
advocating for the introduction, development and endorsement of DRR legal frameworks at national
level. For this the project has adopted three clear strategies. The first is by mobilizing media. Co‐
Action Nepal as national partner is efficiently carrying out the project activities to mobilise media
and was able to demonstrate a number of relevant articles published in print and electronic media.
This strategy can be assumed to be helping to bring the issues of disaster in Nepal into the attention
of public and the government; however the project did not have the opportunity to assess the level
of public awareness directly. The project then has another strategy of sensitizing policy makers
(constituent assembly members themselves) on the need, and urgency of having legislative
frameworks on disasters in place.
The third strategy is redesigning conventional ways of celebrating events so as to draw mass
attention and pressurise the government to have adequate DRR policies in place in Nepal as part of
its commitment to the Hyugo Framework Agreement (HFA). The celebration of International S
Disaster Reduction (ISDR) day in 2009 was a mega event having its impacts both on the government
and, the UN and other agencies. Following ISDR Day, which was attended by a large number of
people representing grass root disaster victims, disaster networks, professional, journalists,
government and other agencies, the Government made a further commitment to endorse the draft
Disaster Management Act and policy? While it is difficult to assess the link directly, and the MTR did
not have the opportunity to interview involved officials, it is likely that this activity strongly
influenced the Government’s action.
8
9.
Major Findings / Observations of the Review
Project Result 1: Alignment with CSP
Capacity of target communities The Result 1 of the project activities thereof aligns with the
is enhanced to reduce impact of Strategic approach of “Enabling and Empowering Rights
disasters through local collective Holders” and contributes to achieving the thematic strategy
actions on Women’s Rights and Rights of vulnerable groups.
Community level DRR structures / institutions in place and trained
After the communities identified the local hazards and risks associated with it through
discussions in REFLECT circles and participatory vulnerability analyses, community based disaster
risk reduction committees have been formed and operational in the 5 areas visited during the
MTR. Partner records further indicate that 18 REFLECT circles and DMCs have been established.
The districts where the MTR was carried out share common hazards and risks. These hazards
include floods, inundation, fire, cold snap, heat waves and windstorms, whereas earthquake is a
common hazard across the country.
Communities informed the MTR that Disaster Management Committees have actively been
involved in reducing risks posed to them as a result of disasters. Despite being involved in
community level disaster preparedness, mitigation and risk reduction initiatives, Disaster
Management Committees are also taken as a forum for knowledge sharing in preparedness of
disasters. People are happy after the implementation of the project as they have been now
more informed about the preparedness, early warning systems like the use of siren. These DMCs
were found named in local languages like Musibat Vyabastahpan Samiti that has contributed to
the better understanding of communities and own it further.
These local structures were found institutionalised through it regularised meetings, linkages with
local government agencies and having a pool of trained volunteers. These disaster management
committees have created emergency funds. For this, fistful of rice campaign is also contributing
to the accumulation of such funds. In one of the villages visited, Sunsari, Ward # 9, the system
was fully developed and functioning well. Once the storage of food grain is full, it is converted
into cash and deposited in the community bank account and the campaign restarts to fill the
storage again.
Progress in some areas was observed to be a little uneven. While the FFR campaign was
reported to have started in two villages (Sunsari Ward 9 and ….), in others this was not the case.
Narsing 4 (madrasa) community leaders reported some hesitancy in starting the FFR for disaster
response, as the community already contributed funds for a shared account and they were
concerned about a double‐burden for the community. In another village in Banke (Bhojpur),
divisions in the community undermined confidence in the possibility of a shared account being
managed appropriately. This is likely to affect the community’s commitment to contributing to
the fund.
Communities resilience to disaster increased through community level preparedness and
mitigation
The communities were found better prepared for future disasters. The local disaster risk
reduction initiatives led by the disaster preparedness committees in full involvement of local
people has substantially reduced the risks. The communities collect food grains as decided either
9
10. in REFLECT circles or in disaster management committees to support for the families to be
affected in future disasters. The communities were found to have developed and adopted safer
cultures also at household levels. The communities that fall pray to recurring flood inundation
have raised their household food storage so as to keep food grain safe from water logging. Apart
from keeping the food grain storage safe, the communities were also found to have their
important documents and assets like the citizenship certificate, land possession certificate, cash
and jewelleries placed in a high place in a strong boxes provided by the project..
The communities have raised the plinth of tube wells so they can avoid drinking contaminated
water during monsoon. Unlike earlier the communities believe that they would not be affected
by the water borne diseases as they will have access to uncontaminated drinking water even
during water inundation in monsoon. The availability of trained volunteers in different life skills
like CBDRR, first aid, fire fighting, light search and rescue has made the communities more safer.
These volunteers were found very enthusiastic and ready to offer their help voluntarily. In
Sunsari, the Madarsa / school has been made safer. The madarsa in Narsing‐ 4 sunsari has now
been safer as it has been built with a raised plinth, and the way to it has been mande safer from
constricting a culvert that has ensured smooth access to the school. This initiative has reduced
the risks to the students from flood on the one hand and the community can take immediate
shelter during any emergency in future. The community people are well aware of then benefit of
making school safer.
REFLECT really an effective tool to empower community and help them take pro active
measures‐ visible women empowerment
REFLECT circles were found to have been very important tool for mobilizing community people
and for their empowerment. The introduction of these circles in the communities has provided a
common forum for community people to discuss about their common concerns, seek for
solutions to these concerns collectively and translate it into actions. REFLECT circles are taken as
the first opportunity by women for representing themselves at community level.
A Reflect center was formed in Ithari municipality ward no. 7 under DIPECHO IV project has been under
refresher activities in the current project. The area was prone to flood inundation, windstorm and other
local hazards. Mitigation measure like culvert with safe exit was made during the project in
collaboration with municipality office. More importantly awareness raising activities were organized
through Reflect sessions. Reflect participants became aware that unless & until there houses are built
flood & other local hazard proof; it was difficult to build safer communities. They influenced peoples in
the community to build new or renovate old house with raised plinth level. Now there are more than 10
houses with such structures. Reflect centers are continuously campaigning on it. It may be one of the
best examples on impact of DIPECHO Project.
‐Shared by Kamali Chaudhary, REFLECT facilitator, Ithari, 2009
Every member of the circles believes that he/she has found a space to voice their concerns.
After the REFLECT circles people have started discussing about their social issues, felt
empowered together to voice their concerns, access government resources and unity as a social
unity. In Babiya VDC of Sunsari district the REFLECT circle was found to have driven away people
from other places extracting sand from the river near by the village which could resulted in
erosion and the river change it course towards the village. They are proud they could do it
together for keeping their villages safer from the risks. The women who earlier would remain
inside the four walls of their house now have been active part of disaster risk reduction
10
11. initiatives as a result of their involvement in REFLECT cirles. Women feel that they have now
been more vocal, unlike earlier they are not to speak out their minds with their male partners.
Male partners have also been more supportive towards them. Now men allow women to join
REFLECT classes as they know their female partners are learning and being empowered. People
believe hat discussion on REFLECT are really useful and they pay attention to the disabled,
elderly people, and lactating mothers as special needs groups in any emergency. Community
people have recorded the number of such people and located them so these groups can be
given special treatment during and disasters in future. The participation of women can be seen
meaningful as they feel they have been able to influence the decisions taken in various
committees like the DMC or the REFLECT that affect their lives. They have been able to have a
female signatory to the bank account opened by the Disaster Management Committees in
Sunsari. The women have been treasurer in disaster management committees.
Teachers/ students trained on CBDRR in Banke demonstrated school safety awareness;
carrying messages home
Apart from the community based approach, the approach of going to the communities through
schools was also seen equally important in Banke. Teachers and students who were trained on
community based disaster risk reduction have immensely helped them increase their capacities
in analyzing local hazards and risks associated to it. This training has also helped them
understand the concept of disaster risk management cycle. The students who were trained on
disaster risk management in schools are carrying messages on disaster education to their
parents back home. Students were conversant on local disaster issues the impacts of disaster on
them. They also knew how to prepare for future disaster impacts on school and their study. The
school family both the students, teachers and school management committees have realized
that making schools safer can serve dual role first as protecting students and teachers during any
disasters while in schools, and other school offering temporary shelter for communities in case
of any emergencies and displacement. The realization that making school safer is to protect a
generation, as a school houses hundreds of students at the same time. The culture of safety can
also be cultivated among students making next generation more prepared for any disasters.
Women’s participation in community decision‐making was visible
During the discussions with the women it was found that the project is contributing towards
promoting women’s participation not only at local or community level but also at district level.
The REFLECT circles, Participatory Vulnerability Analysis and different training activities have
empowered women, compared to their baseline situation. There are almost fifty percent or
more women in the REFLECT circles. There is descent representation of women in Disaster
Management Committees. The women not only have been able to have their presence in
different forums and fora but also were found to have been able to influence the decisions they
way they want.. Also was found that there are women co signatory to the bank account.. The
meeting with the women in Gangapur in Banke revealed that women have started approaching
local village development office inquiring about existing provisions at village level for woment
development. The women group in Banke has been able to access Village Development Fund
and use it for filling soil on the low lying road. The women group and Disaster management
committee of Newajigaon, Gangapur was able to get Rs. 40000.00 for this road improvement
work.
11
12. Project is succeeding with ‘difficult’ communities
The project has been successful in reaching most vulnerable communities, building their
capacities and better preparing communities for withstanding any disasters in future. The
communities it has been successfully working like the Babiya Village Develoment Committee or
Gangapur VDC in Banke where other agencies generally do not prefer to go there as they feel
this community is very difficult to work with, or is very difficult for the social mobilization part. It
was repeatedly mentioned by the youths of the village. And the youths are now proud that they
have been successful in promoting community based preparedness.
Project Result 1: Alignment with CSP
Enabling environment created The Result 2 of the project activities thereof aligns with the
through appropriate DRR Strategic approach of “Engagement for pro‐rights policies
policies and plans and governance” and contributes to achieving the overall
organizational strategy of ActionAid in Nepal
Local partners found to be active, proud, recognized in community and at district level
The local partners of this project are very active, and are recognized in the communities.
Communities are very much appreciative of partners and their roles in mobilizing communities,
helping them in their community based disaster preparedness initiatives. The visible relation
between partners especially in Sunsari seems that the communities and the partners will remain
in touch for future joint initiatives around disaster issues beyond the current project. An
example of it is that the Disaster Management Committees from previous DIPECHO project are
in constant coordination with partner and the same partner is with this project. The government
and other non governmental agencies involved in the areas of disaster risk management
initiatives at diastrict level are well recognizing DIPECHO project partner’s work in the district.
These partners are strongly present in different disaster management networks in the district. As
the government and other agencies are positive towards these partners,these partners were
found at a position from where they can influence the decisions taken at district level for the
disaster risk reduction initiatives. The local partner is Sunsari is putting its effort to form a district
level network of disaster management committees. It is also advocating for the representation
of disaster victims in the District Disaster Relief Committee (DDRC) in Sunsari. The DDRC which is
chaired and led by the Chief District Officer is positive towards this proposal. The district
administration office and district development office representatives during our meeting with
them told the review team that the disaster management committees and other structured
formed at local community level under the DIPECHO V project are treated as the source for
collecting local information.
National partner is capable of mobilizing media and policy advocacy at national level going
right way
Co‐Action Nepal, the national partner of the DIPECHO V project is active in the initiatives taken
up by the project at national level for the policy advocacy. The mobilization of media especially
the appearance of news and articles on disaster issues in Nepal and television programs have
contributed to further draw the attention of the general public for their awareness and of the
policy makers to further work on having adequate legislative instruments like the Disaster
Mangement Act, Policy and Sectoral Strategies in place at national level. Though the drafting of
National Disaster Management Act, Policy and Strategy was done before the commencement of
this project, the project now has been toiling hard to have these documents endorsed by the
parliament in Nepal. As a result of the policy advocacy initiatives taken up at national level by
12
13. the project, the council of minister has endorsed the disaster management strategy in Nepal.
DIPECHO V project is strategic in influencing national policies. The sensitization of constituent
assembly members who are also legislatives has substantially contributed for the policy
advocacy. The draft act and policy that are yet to be endorsed by the parliament are on way to
be tabled in the parliament.. This is also the result of the sensitization of parliamentarians on the
urgency of disaster management act and policies in place in Nepal keeping in view the recurring
damages and loss from the disasters in Nepal. The project has also made a DRR tool kit and
shared widely throughout the country especially the government which has further contributed
to generate pressure on the government to have the draft act and policies endorsed as soon as
possible. Another strategic way of gathering additional support for the policy advocacy work at
national level was the event organized to celebrate ISDR day in 2009. This day was not
celebrated just in a conventional way but was utilized tactfully for the mass awareness and
policy advocacy. The ever biggest event gathering people right from the community people who
are facing disaster impact to the professional, policy makers, international agencies to the
government. A ten points demand on and around the urgency of disaster management issues in
Nepal was presented to the President. And this was led by the people coming from the grass
roots demanding for their rights to be protected.
DIPECHO partners strongly appreciate AAN leadership in advocacy and community awareness
as well as AAN’s open approach to involving stakeholders
ActionAid Nepal is taking lead among DIPECHO partners in Nepal. A meeting held with other
DIPECHO partners to discuss about ActionAid Nepal’s role through the project agreed that the
coordination mechanism that has been developed is a good cross learning forum. Participants of
the meeting said that ActionAid Nepal is efficiently coordinating all DIPECHO partners and taking
lead in different national level disaster risk reduction initiatives. ActionAid Nepal is taking on
board all partners and all partners feel proud of being part of the innovative initiatives taken up
by ActionAid Nepal. ActionAid Nepal comes up with new ideas and initiatives and the DIPECHO
partners. For example the celebration of 2009 ISDR day was originally designed by ActionAid
DIPECHO project which was successful in gathering thousands of people, drawing mass attention
to the issue of disaster in Nepal and presenting ten points demand to the government through
the President of Nepal. This event was really resulted in having further government commitment
to work towards the disaster risk management in Nepal along with further commitment for the
endorsement of the draft disaster management act, policies and strategies. DIPECHO partners
believe that together with ActionAid DIPECHO project they have been more visible, their voices
have been stronger and have been able to influence national plan, policies and programmes on
and around disaster in Nepal. In this regard, these partners have had strategic engagement with
other DRR networks and agencies in Nepal. Other partners feel comfortable to jointly work with
ActionAid Nepal because in order to be part of any joint initiatives any p artner can have space
to chip in even if they are not in a position to share resources for the initiatives. The
coordination mechanism forum has also provided a space for partners to learn from each other
and replicate the best practices in their respective intervention areas.
Project Result 1: Alignment with CSP
Target stakeholders demonstrate The Result 3 of the project activities thereof aligns
increased awareness on disaster with the Strategic approach of “Mass
preparedness methods at family and conscientisation on Rights” and contributes to
community level Enabling environment achieving the thematic strategy on Right to
created through appropriate DRR policies Education and Women’s Rights
and plans
13
14. The level of awareness among community people around local hazards and the preparedness
is high
The level of awareness among community people on and around disasters was found very
satisfactory. Whereas community has been living with disasters for long, the discussions with
direct beneficiaries made clear their overall understanding, particularly on preparedness has
improved through the project. This raise of awareness levels resulted from the discussion,
sharing and learning in REFLECT centres, and various training and sensitization activities
undertaken at community level. People are conversant about local hazards and the risks they
might face and also how to prepare for facing the disasters in future. When asked what they
would do in an earthquake, most of the people replied that they would go under a table, hold it
tight until the quake stops and leave the place. In Narsing 4 Tapara Tole the community group
reported that they learned about this through a project street drama. Communities also know
they have to identify safe exit and locate a safe areas so people can be use the safe route and go
to the safe place during floods.
Street drama / IEC materials contribute to increase disaster awareness
The street drama demonstrations on various themes have been a strong medium to disseminate
disaster education to the wider communities. The community people stated that they received
messages related to earthquake and flood through the demonstrations of street dramas. As the
dramas were in their own local languages the intended messages to the target population was
stronger. Likewise the use of various IEC materials like posters, pamphlets, wall paintings and
flip charts are also helping communities to understand disaster issues and preparedness for it. In
Banke, When asked on a poster message, women of REFLECT circles could tell what the message
was about. The street dramas were found very effective to create awareness among illiterate
communities. The use of audio visuals on and around disasters was also found very effective
means of disseminating disaster education among community people.
Project Result 4: Alignment with CSP
Small scale mitigation measures The Result 4 of the project activities thereof aligns with the
with government and local Strategic approach of “Enabling and Empowering Rights
support contribute to Holders” and contributes to achieving the thematic strategy
vulnerability reduction on Women’s Rights and Rights of vulnerable groups.
The construction of bio dyke will protect the target communities
The construction of bio dyke in Gangapur, Banke is a large scale disaster mitigation measure and
it certainly is going to protect whole target communities from the floods and its impact on the
local communities. This bio dyke is useful in change the course of flooding water making
communities safe. The critical concern here is that though this dyke will protect the target
communities of one side but there is no assessment of impacts of this dyke people living on the
other side.
Project Management
The overall project management is efficient and the current project structure is functional to the
level of satisfaction. The monitoring and supervision is taking place timely and donor requirements
relating to the financial as well as narrative reports are prepared as per the recommended donor
format and guidelines. Partners are satisfied with the amount of support they are getting from
project staffs. Project partners have capacities to implement the project activities at local level. The
14
15. documentation part of the project is being taken seriously. The partners and communities are well
aware of the budgets, and planning system which has contributed to the maintenance of
transparency and accountability.
Sustainability:
The project locations in DIPECHO V project has been selected based on the long term presence of
ActionAid which augurs well for the sustainability of the results generated by the project. The
project presence in Banke is particularly interesting, as ActionAid has just initiated a long term
development project in the area, which means that the development project defacto starts with
initiation to risk reduction. This will help the communities ingrain the essence of risk reduction
within their mindsets, translating any future development work well integrated with DRR. This is a
classic case of DRR mainstreaming, the ultimate mission of any risk reduction initiative at community
level. However, there is a need for strengthening coordination and collaboration between the long
term development works of ActionAid with that of the project. At an organizational level, the team
has found that there is an increasing focus in integrating projects into development works, which is
the right step at the policy level to ensure that project strengths are utilized to boost development
works and projects contribute to long term development plans. Vice versa, this also helps the project
to develop its own exit strategy without worrying about sustainability of the results from the project.
The overall project objective, expected results and activities planned are contributing the Country
Strategy Paper III (Revised) of ActionAid Nepal and is within the overall framework of the Human
Security Policy of ActionAid International. The project is contributing not only directly to the
communities it targets, but also in terms o crucial organizational knowledge and know how on
disaster risk reduction initiatives.
Donor Compliance
The MTR team has found that the project is implemented in accordance with the contractual
agreement with the donors (European Commission Humanitarian Aid department and AusAID).
Coordination within the organization
The project is not being managed as a stand along project. Attempt has been made by the
management of AAN to integrate the project within the overall program framework of the
organization in line with the Country Strategy Paper III (Revised). The MTR team found increased as
well as well informed involvement of Regional Resource Centres (Eastern and Western regions) in
project management. Whereas this method of management is logical in organizational view point
and should be the approach for long term sustainability and value addition to development works,
the team found that the coordination and collaboration modalities have not been worked out
totally, thereby creating certain grey areas in information flow and authorization. MTR team
understands that ActionAid Nepal is aware of this and are working on the systems to make project
management and integral component of overall program management.
15
16.
Recommendations
1. Continue building on links between VDCs, DDCs and DMCs
Though the Disaster Management Committees are with the support from partner having linkages
with local government agencies and other Disaster Risk Reduction Networks, additional support is
needed for the Disaster Management Committees to establish, promote and strengthen their
relation with other agencies. As the project is half way now, this effort is required to ensure that
local DRR structure formed during the project continue working with other agencies beyond the
project inputs. There is a need for a development of a institutionalized mechanism in which the
disaster management committees are accepted as integral part of district level networks and the
disaster management committees feel a sense of belonging to a permanent kind of network even
after the project phases out. As most of the government agencies are very much positive and
appreciative of both the local disaster management committees and local partners, the possibility of
having better linkages with them is very high.
2. Select DMC members from REFLECT circles after initial DRR discussions to ensure better
understanding/commitment (Sunsari vs. Banke)
It was found that in some places DMC’s were formed before the REFLECT started and in some places
REFLECT circles started first then DMCs were formed. It is recommended that REFLECT circles are
started first, then the communities start discussing about local disasters and risks, understand the
concept of community based disaster preparedness. Once the participants of the circles are
adequately knowledgeable about disasters and their roles in it only then DMCs be formed.
3. Emergency Fund utilisation guidelines should be provided by the project to avoid potential
community conflict
Most of the Disaster Management Committees have created emergency fund which is a very good
practice and it must be promoted and replicated in other area where it is absent. The communities
have collected fund and deposited in the bank and general understanding among community
members is that this fund will be used to support the victims of future disasters. There seems lack of
clarity as to how the fund will be channeled, who will get how much and how it will be replaced. This
fund has not been used so far so the probable complications for its utilization have not been felt. But
it is sure that there will be problems when this fund used in future. In order to avoid it, a clear
guideline as to how this fund will be operated needs to be developed and operationalised. DIPECHO
project need not to develop a new guideline as there are other DMCs like in the Disaster Risk
Reduction through Schools Project areas have developed the guideline. DIPECHO project simple can
replicate it.
4. In divided communities, take extra measures to ensure all groups are included in decision‐
making process and structures from the beginning (Bhojpur). Give additional support and
emphasis in the overall processes in Banke area
In Banke, on the social mobilization part, the process adopted during the analysis of vulnerabilities
seems that the representation in the process was not fully participatory. Those who did not take part
in the initial process are not supportive to the initiatives taken by other. Thus the community seems
to have split. This is causing problems. The community is divided. In order to avoid such situation in
future, project needs to ensure that there is full participation representing all sections of the society.
In Banke (Bhojpur), it is now necessary to take extra measures to minimize the differences between
16
17. the two groups immediately; otherwise the situation might be worse. The construction of bio dye in
Bhojpura, Banke might create problems to the people living on the other side of the dye. An
assessment of the impacts of the dyke needs to be carried out immediately and take measures not
to let the situation get worse. And for new dykes an environmental / impact assessment must be
conducted prior to the construction. The project management along with the regional resource
centre should give additional emphasis to the overall processes in Banke operations.
5. Strengthen efforts to assist community to translate learning and awareness into specific action
plans (identification of safe locations for emergencies; focal point person for activating sirens
etc)
In a short span of time the project seems to have been able to create awareness on disaster among
community people is really appreciable. Community people have the knowledge and information on
what to do in an emergency. For example the women of Babiya in Sunsari know that they have to go
to an elevated land during flooding and that location should be known to all and safe. But this
knowledge has not been translated into action. No such safe place has been identified, and located
yet. The review team strongly recommends help the communities to translate their learning into
actions. The communities know that their disaster preparedness plans must treat women, elderly,
disabled, and pregnant woman as special groups having special needs more during any emergency
but there are very few cases of reflecting these special needs in their preparedness plan.
6. Strengthen gender and disability‐inclusive planning in community initiatives (handrails on
raised water pumps; pregnant women/ nursing mothers)
There is a need for a inclusive kind of planning so as to address the special needs of the disabled,
women, children and nursing mothers. The hand pumps have been raised. This allows community
people to have access to water even during flooding because the pumps have been raised to the
level above which the flood water generally does not go. But if a disabled is to fetch water from
these pumps they can not reach up to the pump as there are no handrails to support them. This is
only an example. All of our initiatives have to seriously take into account the issues of inclusive
planning addressing the issues of gender and disabilities.
.
7. The construction of school and retrofitting should start immediately
In Bojpur of Banke, there is a plan to retrofit a school building. In this particular area the community
itself is divided over the construction of the bio dyke and other social issues. There is a need for
building a consensus among community people and start the retrofitting of the school building
immediately.
8. Request partners to undertake strict technical and quality monitoring of construction works
(schools, pumps etc)
Though the communities are constructing water pumps, schools and culverts as part of their
preparedness for future disaster, it is very difficult to ensure the quality of construction works. There
is lack of technical as well as quality monitoring mechanism from the project. It is therefore
necessary to have a technical as well as quality inspection of the structures constructed and ensure
that future construction works will have the technical and quality insurance mechanism inbuilt in the
planning process and it is implemented strictly.
17
18.
ANNEX
ERMS OF REFERENCE
Mid Term Review of DIPECHO V Project implemented by ActionAid in Nepal
Project Title: Surakshit Samudaya II: Building Community Resilience to disaster
Donor: European Commission Humanitarian Aid department & Australian
Government ‐ AusAid
Implementing Partner: ActionAid (in Nepal)
Reviewers: To be led by AAI IECT and AAA
Suggested Duration: 9 days including planning, travel, field visits and report writing
Suggested Period: First week of March, 2010
Background
ActionAid Nepal has received funding support from European Commission through its Humanitarian
Aid department (under DIPECHO V Action Plan for South Asia) to implement a 15 month project
titled “Surakshit Samudaya II: Building Disaster Resilient Communities, Nepal”. The project will be
implemented in three districts of Nepal (Banke, Sunsari and Udayapur) in association with AAN local
partners, directly covering nearly 13,000 people in 7 municipal and 5 village development
committees. This includes refresher activities in 8 wards covered under the DIPECHO IV project. The
project is co‐financed by Australian Government – AUSAID. ActionAid Nepal is implementing
DIPECHO project for consecutive third term now, having successfully completed two previous cycles
under DIPECHO III (2006‐07) as well as DIPECHO IV (2007‐09).
The specific objective of the project is to strengthen capacities of community and local institutions
for reducing impact of disasters and ensuring rights of disaster vulnerable people
The key components of the project includes community mobilization and strengthening of
leadership through REFLECT and participatory processes, awareness generation, capacity building,
skill enhancement, model small scale mitigation measures and networking, to be implemented
based on principles and values of participation, transparency and accountability. National advocacy
on DRR/HFA is one of the key component of the project to ensure a sound DRR policy framework .
Project Objective
To strengthen capacities of community and local institutions for reducing impact of disasters and
ensuring rights of disaster vulnerable people
Expected Results and Activities
Result 1:
Capacity of target communities is enhanced to reduce impact of disasters through collective local
actions
18
19.
Activities to achieve Result 1:
1. To mobilize the community and strengthen grassroots institutions:
Formation and continuation of 18 REFLECT circles and DMCs (8 old from DIPECHO IV),
periodic meetings of REFLECT circles and DMCs; development of community level action
plans on DRR
2. To train DMC members and community volunteers on preparedness and emergency response:
Training on CBDRR for 160 people including DMC members, volunteers, teachers and
students; training to 150 volunteers on First Aid, Light Search and Rescue and Emergency
Response; Training to 48 staff and volunteers on Participatory Vulnerability Analysis;
REFLECT ToT to 24 persons
3. To equip communities with disaster management materials, fund and Early Warning Systems:
Establish disaster rescue and relief kit including for food and water security during disasters;
establishment of emergency relief fund within the 10 target communities; training on EWS
to 60 volunteers; workshop on EWS with different stakeholders for 60 persons from
government and community and establishment of CBEWS with support from Practical Action
Result 2:
Enabling environment created through appropriate DRR policies and plans
Activities to achieve Result 2:
1. Form and strengthen networking of DMCs and stakeholders in district level
Form and strengthen district level networking of DMCs and stakeholders; organize network
meetings, exposure visit of DMC members to other areas within Nepal
2. Train government officers and NGO leaders on DRR/HFA
Training to 60 government officers and 60 NGOs on DRR/HFA
3. Advocate towards national policy framework on disaster risk reduction
Sensitize 150 CA members on DRR/HFA; advocate adoption of national strategy by CA;
convention of vulnerable people on ISDR day, celebration of EQSD, ISDR day etc; training to
30 journalists on DRR; grassroots dissemination of information related to DRR/HFA
Result 3:
Target stakeholders demonstrate increased awareness on disaster preparedness methods at family
and community level
Activities to Achieve Result 3:
1. Participatory Vulnerability Analysis
Conduct PVA through 30 field applications and mapping at various stages in project areas
2. Mass awareness raising
Print and distribute IEC materials like posters, brochures, leaflets etc.; broadcast messages
through FM radio; organize 60 street theatre shows and 60 DRR video shows in the
community
Result 4:
Small scale mitigation measures with government and local support contribute to vulnerability
reduction
Activities to achieve Result 4:
Retrofitting work: Retrofit 2 school buildings and one hospital building as pilot initiatives
Embankment protection in two locations (bio‐dyke, green belt) of approximately 200 mtrs
Elevate 20 handmpumps in two districts to make them disaster proof
19
20.
Strategic Approach to Disaster Preparedness
• Make disaster preparedness a community‐based approach, ensuring participation and
ownership of the project
• REFLECT to be used as the key participatory process and tool for local planning and
implementation
• Raising awareness and building capacities to complement community mobilization and
leadership development to effectively respond to disasters
• Developing and nurturing a pool of local resource persons in participatory disaster
preparedness initiatives at the community level
• Building partner capacity to facilitate disaster risk reduction process based on competence,
transparency and accountability
• Advocating rights of people affected or impacted by disasters or prone to disasters to lead a life
with dignity
• Advocating with national stakeholders for a sound policy environment in Nepal
• Collaboration and networking among various stakeholders at local and national level to be
strengthened
• Contribution to local and national efforts in building a disaster resilient Nepal
European Commission Humanitarian Aid department
The European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid department is under the direct responsibility of
Commissioner Louis Michel. Since 1992, the Commission has funded relief to millions of victims of
natural and man‐made disasters outside the European Union.
Aid is channelled impartially to the affected populations, regardless of their race, ethnic group,
religion, gender, age, nationality or political affiliation. In the area of humanitarian aid, the
Commission works with 200 operational partners, including specialised United Nations agencies, the
Red Cross/Crescent movement and non‐governmental organisations (NGOs). The European
Commission is one of the biggest sources of humanitarian aid in the world. In 2006, it provided 671
million euro for humanitarian programmes. This does not include the aid given separately by the
EU’s 25 Member States. Support went to projects in 74 countries. The funds are spent on goods and
services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical provisions, water supplies, sanitation, emergency
repairs and mine‐clearing.
The Commission also funds disaster preparedness and mitigation projects in regions prone to natural
catastrophes. Under department of Disaster Preparedness (DIPECHO), the European Commission’s
Humanitarian Aid department has been supporting a number of disaster preparedness initiatives in
South Asia, including Nepal.
Australian Agency for International Development ‐ AusAid
AusAID is the Australian Government agency responsible for managing Australia’s overseas aid
program. The objective of the aid program is to assist developing countries reduce poverty and
achieve sustainable development, in line with Austrailia’s national interest.
The Australian government has invested in a range of disaster risk reduction activities at the
regional, bilateral and community level in over 30 countries and is committed to strengthening the
capacity of partner countries to reduce disaster risks in line with Hyogo Framework for Action.
20
21. ActionAid
ActionAid is an international anti‐poverty agency working in over 40 countries, taking sides with
poor people to end poverty and injustice together. Founded in the United Kingdom in 1972 and
registered as a global entity in The Hague, the Netherlands in September 2003, the ActionAid
International Secretariat is based in Johannesburg, South Africa.
ActionAid is committed to improving the quality of life of the poorest and the most excluded people
so that they can live a life of dignity. It has over three hundred thousand supporters across Europe.
ActionAid has been working in Nepal since 1982. Its mission here is to empower poor and excluded
people to eradicate poverty and injustice. The work of ActionAid International Nepal (AAIN),
hereafter referred to as ActionAid Nepal (AAN), over the years has undergone various changes
informed by its engagement at the community and other levels. Its scope of work has thus grown in
content, coverage, commitment, and capacity to work in a multifarious situation over the period.
AAN changed its approach from direct service delivery to partnership mode with local NGOs in 1996.
Similarly, it adopted rights‐based approach in 1998 with an aim to creating an environment in which
poor and excluded people can exercise their rights, and address and overcome the causes and
effects of poverty. Currently, AAN’s long‐term partnership programmes at field level. In addition,
AAN has several short‐term engagements with over 200 NGOs, CBOs, Alliances, Networks and
Forums across the country.
AAN’s rights holders are the poorest and the most excluded people particularly women, children,
victims of conflict and disasters, poor landless and tenants, people living with HIV and AIDS, Dalits,
indigenous peoples, former Kamaiya, people with disabilities, and urban poor. AAN has prioritised
five themes based on the local context and needs – Women’s Rights, Education, Food Security, HIV
and AIDS and Peace Building. These apart, AAN is also engaged in issues such as Emergency and
Disaster, Globalisation, Governance, Gender Equity, and Social Inclusion that cut across our priority
themes.
AAN works at the grassroots and at the national levels with various advocacy programmes in order
to influence public policies and practices in favour of the poorest and the most excluded people and
to address their immediate conditions. As a chapter of ActionAid International, AAN is also actively
engaged in advocating at the regional and international levels on issues such as Women’s Rights,
Education, Food, Human Security during Conflict and Emergencies, HIV and AIDS, and Just and
Democratic Governance that cut across globally, to campaign for pro‐poor policies and to enable the
poor and excluded people to secure their rights.
Overall Objective of Mid Term Review (MTR)
The broad objective of the MTR is to study and analyse the project progress towards achieving the
set objectives and recommend ways and methods of improving quality and efficiency of project
implementation.
The specific purpose of the MTR will be to
• Study and analyse the project processes to measure the extent of its progress towards achieving
the set objectives and anticipated results including sustenance of the results of the project, (vis‐
a‐vis indicators mentioned in the log frame).
• Analyse the relevance of the process and approach of the project to achieve set objectives and
anticipated results
21
22. • Study and analyse the project management and monitoring tools and its relevance in achieving
the set objectives and anticipated results
• Recommend course corrections, in terms of processes and actions so as to improve the overall
quality and efficiency of the project to achieve the set objectives and anticipated results
To analyse the project outcome in terms of empowerment, particularly with respect to building
capacities of women and other differentially vulnerable groups to participate and contribute to
the decision making process
To review the management and implementation processes adopted by the project
To analyse the level of ownership and receptiveness of the communities and their participation
in the implementation processes
To review and analyse the contribution of the project to ActionAid Nepal’s core strategy on
human security, emergency and disaster management in line with the revised CSP III and to
ActionAid International HST/IECT strategy
To review and suggest some of the key learning and practises that have potential for wider
application and replication in similar approaches elsewhere, if any
Outcome/Product of Evaluation
The reviewer(s) are required to submit a detailed report in accordance with the objective(s) of MTR,
which will form the key outcome of the review process. The report is expected to be an analytical
document that will satisfy the objective of the MTR, thereby helping the project to strengthen its
implementation processes adding quality and value to achievement of objectives. The report will be
shared with the donors (European Commission Humanitarian Aid department and AusAid),
ActionAid International IECT Team, ActionAid UK, ActionAid Australia, ActionAid Nepal management
and other key stakeholders for their information, comments and suggestions thereof.
Mid Term Review Report: The proposed structure of the report is as follows:
• Cover page
• Table of Contents
• Foreword/Acknowledgements
• Executive Summary (max. 3 pages)
• Main Body of the Report (max 25 pages)
• Key findings/observations against set parameters, as per objective
• Recommendations
• Acronyms
• MTR Schedule including interviewees, references etc.
• Terms of Reference
Methodology
In order to develop ownership and ensure the involvement and interest of the stakeholders for
sustainable changes and future developments, the assessment will be conducted in a participatory
way, involving AA team, project team, partner staff, consultants, beneficiaries, and other people or
institutions directly or indirectly involved in development and implementation of the project.
The following methods may be used:
» Review of the project documentation: A number reports, original proposal as well as interim
reports are available. Various periodic communication bulletins and reports are available.
These sources will be a base on the reference of the project, which will help the evaluator(s) to
understand the project as well as summaries the achievements.
22
23. » Interview of the key staffs of the projects: Individual interview of ActionAid Nepal, partners,
government officials and other key stakeholders involved.
» Participatory group exercise: participatory group exercise with the project’s key stakeholders
(different disaster management committees, National and International NGOs, government
officials, DIPECHO partners in Nepal) to review achievements, approaches and potentials.
» Community Assessment: participatory methodologies e.g. focus group discussion, interview,
case studies and other tools are suggested for community assessment.
Proposed Plan of Action for Evaluation
Preparation
Review of literature and documents
Preparation of field visit plan, schedule, tools and checklist for evaluation (to be finalised
with AA DIPECHO team)
Field Visit
Briefing meeting with ActionAid team
Field visit to ActionAid Nepal offices, partners offices, project area for various interview,
discussions, group meetings etc. as per the schedule
Reporting
Debriefing meeting with ActionAid team
Preparation of draft reports
Feedback on draft report
Submission of final report to ActionAid
Composition of the MTR Team
The MTR team will comprise of the following persons (provisional, subject to confirmation)
• Shakeb Nabi, IECT Nominee and DIPECHO Project Manager, AA Bangladesh (Team Leader)
• Grace Nicholas, Programme Coordinator, AA Australia
• Thir Bahadur GC, Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Home Affaris, Government of Nepal
• Sunita Gurung, Programme Officer, AusAid Nepal
• Intern (for translation and field support)
Proposed time Frame
The MTR will be conducted in the first week of March 2010. The suggested time frame is given
below:
NO OF
ACTIVITIES DATE REMARKS
DAYS
1. PREPARATION
Review of key documents 1 day
Preparation for the tools and checklists 1 day
2. FIELD VISIT INCLUDING TRAVEL TIME
23
24. Briefing meeting in ActionAid Nepal ½ day
Field visit (three districts)
Meeting with beneficiaries and key stakeholders both in
field including partner staff and partner NGOs 5 days
Physical verification of mitigation structures
Meeting with key stakeholders and DIPECHO partners in
Kathmandu including AA team and project staff
3. Analysis and REPORTING
Debriefing with AA team and preparation of draft report ½ day
Develop first draft of the evaluation report 2 days
TOTAL DAYS* 10 DAYS
Documents Available (partial list)
1. Project proposal
2. Activity reports
3. PVA reports and field database
4. Case studies
5. DIPECHO Partners bulletins
6. Minutes of DIPECHO partner coordination meetings
7. Periodic project reports by partners
8. Project management systems, guidelines and tools
9. Country Strategy Paper III (Revised)
10. Emergency and Disaster Management strategy for AA in Nepal
11. Human Security Policy of ActionAid International
Management and logistics of evaluation
ActionAid Nepal will be responsible for the in country logistics like travel, accommodation, etc. for
field visit and meetings with different stakeholders. AA staff members involved in the project will
accompany the evaluator in partners’ meeting and during field visit. The travel to the project site will
be by air or road, as found appropriate. The evaluator will arrange for his own laptop and other
required equipment. The evaluator will bear the final responsibility for report submission,
presentation and to fulfil achievement of the objectives of evaluation.
Contact Person in ActionAid
P. V. Krishnan
DIPECHO Project Manager, Krishnan.pv@actionaid.org; Cell: +977 97510 01368
24