2. “Carrot” for data deposit
“Submit data paper” button on repository
Researcher gets
– Another publication/citation opportunity
– (Data preserved)
Publisher gets
– More data paper submissions
– Link referrals from data repositories
Repositories get
– More data deposots
– Better metadata
3. Next Steps
Month 1
– Detailed technical specification
– Analysis of platforms to identify potential
quick wins
Month 2-4 – reference implementation
– Develop helper app
– Develop interfaces for repos (Oxford,
FigShare)
– Develop Journal interface F1000
4. Approach
Open Development
– Lead dev works on helper app and
coordinates repo/publisher work
– Technical community building
Extensive Community enagagement
– Listserv
– Blog, Wiki
– RDA events etc.
8. Team
Repositories
– Oxford University Research Archive
●
CEDA (Centre for Environmental
Data Archive)
Publishers
– F1000Research
●
Ubiquity Press (OJS)
●
Geophysical Data Journal
●
Wiley (Fiona Murphy)
9. Phase 1 - Requirements
Survey/Analysis of data publisher workflows and data requirements
– Fiona Murphy
Gap Analysis between repos/publishers
Defines functional requirements of helper app
All partners
Draft protocol spec (augmented SWORD, AtomPub for backfeed?)
F1000R, Oxford
Review by all partners
Wireframes for Helper App
Oxford/outsourced
3.5K, 3 months
10. Phase 1 - Requirements
Survey/Analysis of data publisher workflows and data requirements
– Fiona Murphy
Gap Analysis between repos/publishers
Defines functional requirements of helper app
All partners
Draft protocol spec (augmented SWORD, AtomPub for backfeed?)
F1000R, Oxford
Review by all partners
Wireframes for Helper App
Oxford/outsourced
3.5K, 3 months
11. Phase 1 - Requirements
Survey/Analysis of data publisher workflows and data requirements
– Fiona Murphy
Gap Analysis between repos/publishers
Defines functional requirements of helper app
All partners
Draft protocol spec (augmented SWORD, AtomPub for backfeed?)
F1000R, Oxford
Review by all partners
Wireframes for Helper App
Oxford/outsourced
3.5K, 3 months
12. Phase 1 - Requirements
Survey/Analysis of data publisher workflows and data requirements
– Fiona Murphy
Gap Analysis between repos/publishers
Defines functional requirements of helper app
All partners
Draft protocol spec (augmented SWORD, AtomPub for backfeed?)
F1000R, Oxford
Review by all partners
Wireframes for Helper App
Oxford/outsourced
3.5K, 3 months
13. Phase 1 - Requirements
Survey/Analysis of data publisher workflows and data requirements
– Fiona Murphy
Gap Analysis between repos/publishers
Defines functional requirements of helper app
All partners
Draft protocol spec (augmented SWORD, AtomPub for backfeed?)
F1000R, Oxford
Review by all partners
Wireframes for Helper App
Oxford/outsourced
3.5K, 3 months
14. Phase 2 - Development
Develop Helper App (iterative)
– Oxford/outsourced
– TDD so test harness is also a deliverable
Develop Repository Shim (the button) for Oxford
Oxford
Develop Publisher Submission Shim for F1000R
F1000R
Publish final spec
Validation suite for packages
All
Identify candidates for trial deployment
All
Trial Deployment and collate feedback
40K, 4 months
15. Phase 2 - Development
Develop Helper App (iterative, depends on Phase 1 outcome)
– Oxford/outsourced
– TDD so test harness is also a deliverable
Develop Repository Shim (the button) for Oxford
Oxford (2 weeks)
Develop Publisher Submission Shim for F1000R
F1000R (1 week)
Publish final spec
Validation suite for packages
All
Identify candidates for trial deployment
All
Trial Deployment and collate feedback
Up to 40K, 4 months
16. Phase 3 - Expansion
Roll out into production
– Real-life examples for dissemination
Package Helper App for deployment elsewhere
OJS, CEDA/GDJ implementations
Outreach, additional use case development
Initial survey gives us a ready-defined “community”
Sustainability for helper app (the rest is just specs)
Other workflows
Joint deposit-submit
Backfeed for conventional AAS/Publications
Further Deployments and collate feedback
Up to 30K, 6 months