This document discusses the creation of a collaborative knowledge platform to help implement a regional innovation strategy. The platform aims to overcome obstacles to innovation by confronting different actors' perspectives and helping them reconsider their positions. It will include indicators, dashboards, and analysis from enterprise databases to allow actors to position themselves, clarify problems and solutions, and develop their own innovation steering tools. The goal is to move innovation policy away from a market failure model toward one that views innovation as a social process and creates social value in addition to economic value.
The Joint Actions on Climate Change Conference will consist of representatives of governments, industry, retailers, researchers as well as NGOs, consumer organisations and the financial sector. It will bring these stakeholders together with the aim of fostering a fruitful dialogue and bridging gaps in views and positions on how innovation and design can tackle the crisis of climate change. This conference will be a building block towards setting targets for the COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December.
The Joint Actions on Climate Change Conference will consist of representatives of governments, industry, retailers, researchers as well as NGOs, consumer organisations and the financial sector. It will bring these stakeholders together with the aim of fostering a fruitful dialogue and bridging gaps in views and positions on how innovation and design can tackle the crisis of climate change. This conference will be a building block towards setting targets for the COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December.
This presentation provides a general introduction to innovation policy. It is structured in five themes:
1. What is innovation;
2. Why is innovation important;
3. Why should government intervene;
4. What do we know about the efficiency of innovation policy; and
5. A call for government to open its data.
Giulio Quaggiotto (https://twitter.com/gquaggiotto) from the UNDP gave a presentation on Accelerating Impact of Project Portfolios - Notes from the frontier of [ir]relevance in Sitra Lab's (http://sitra.fi/lab) Innovation Portfolio Sensemaking and Management workshop on 28.1.2020 (https://www.sitra.fi/en/events/workshop-innovation-portfolio-sensemaking-and-management/).
Michaela Cosijn & Jen Kelly facilitated 2 days of training on
the nature of innovation as a wider process than research
that innovation takes different forms; different ways of organizing innovation each with its own set of tools; the rationale for using multi-stakeholder platforms for innovation, including innovation platforms; how & when to use innovation platforms, including what works well and typical challenges; the important of considering MEL during Project Design; the range of tools used for different aspects of monitoring evaluation and learning.
how to develop the activities, output, outcome, impact logic of projects; and how to select relevant tools for different MEL tasks
The Innovation Convention fringe session jointly organized by the Polish EU Presidency and Knowledge4Innovation provided an outstanding opportunity to present and discuss the seven key messages from the Warsaw event. Participants and speakers including Anneli Pauli from the European Commission and Lambert van Nistelrooij, Member of the European Parliament, unanimously agreed that all messages were highly relevant and should be considered in future policy making.
The outcomes of the 3rd European Innovation Summit together with the major statements from no less than 20 debates on innovation organised in 2011 by the K4I Forum in the European Parliament form an excellent basis for the 2012 working programme of the Knowledge4Innovation Forum. We welcome all stakeholders and policy makers to join the Knowledge4Innovation Forum to make sure that innovation is given the right attention in relevant EU policies and instruments resulting in more and better innovations and hence jobs and growth.
This presentation provides a general introduction to innovation policy. It is structured in five themes:
1. What is innovation;
2. Why is innovation important;
3. Why should government intervene;
4. What do we know about the efficiency of innovation policy; and
5. A call for government to open its data.
Giulio Quaggiotto (https://twitter.com/gquaggiotto) from the UNDP gave a presentation on Accelerating Impact of Project Portfolios - Notes from the frontier of [ir]relevance in Sitra Lab's (http://sitra.fi/lab) Innovation Portfolio Sensemaking and Management workshop on 28.1.2020 (https://www.sitra.fi/en/events/workshop-innovation-portfolio-sensemaking-and-management/).
Michaela Cosijn & Jen Kelly facilitated 2 days of training on
the nature of innovation as a wider process than research
that innovation takes different forms; different ways of organizing innovation each with its own set of tools; the rationale for using multi-stakeholder platforms for innovation, including innovation platforms; how & when to use innovation platforms, including what works well and typical challenges; the important of considering MEL during Project Design; the range of tools used for different aspects of monitoring evaluation and learning.
how to develop the activities, output, outcome, impact logic of projects; and how to select relevant tools for different MEL tasks
The Innovation Convention fringe session jointly organized by the Polish EU Presidency and Knowledge4Innovation provided an outstanding opportunity to present and discuss the seven key messages from the Warsaw event. Participants and speakers including Anneli Pauli from the European Commission and Lambert van Nistelrooij, Member of the European Parliament, unanimously agreed that all messages were highly relevant and should be considered in future policy making.
The outcomes of the 3rd European Innovation Summit together with the major statements from no less than 20 debates on innovation organised in 2011 by the K4I Forum in the European Parliament form an excellent basis for the 2012 working programme of the Knowledge4Innovation Forum. We welcome all stakeholders and policy makers to join the Knowledge4Innovation Forum to make sure that innovation is given the right attention in relevant EU policies and instruments resulting in more and better innovations and hence jobs and growth.
Photos from Lijiang, considered in prepareation of The Entertainer is the Charm, which is presently with the publishers. Songs and photographs from northwest Yunnan, land of mountains, color, songs and dance
Pro Marketing Templates
Now You Can Get This Really Cool Result, In Less Time by Using My Awesome Thing!
Content Controlled by User - You have full control over the content you'd like to be shown to your customers.
Most Secure Platform Ever - You'll never have to worry about your information being insecure while using this product.
Endless User Capabilities - You have so many options as a user with our system... there's nothing you can't do.
Easy-to-use Tools -
Built-in Messaging System - We've made everything as simple as possible. No need to learn anything.
Integrated Task Calendar - Keep all your to-do's, events and tasks in one place with our integrated calendar.
Top-Notch Support Avaialable 24/7 - We are ALWAYS on hand to answer your questions or concerns. Our promise to you.
Detailed Reports For Everything - Never assume anything with our reports. You need an answer, we've got it for you.
“Envisioning open innovation in destinations” explains the key strategies to develop and operate an open innovation system in a tourism destination. It also envisions many potential outcomes and benefits for the tourism business, the professional contributors and the local communities.
Social Innovation & Open Innovation - Coaching Material for Social Entrepreneursikosom GmbH
Definition of Social Innovation, Open Innovation and Co-Design in Social Business contexts. This slide is part of the project "CE-RESPONSIBLE " by Interreg Central Europe. Hear the presentation at www.net4socialimpact.eu
Esteve almirall esade business school innovation policy -digitalsocialeu
Presentation by Esteve Almirall, Esade Business School, on how policy can support digital social innovation (DSI). Presented at February 3rd 2014 DSI workshop in Brussels.
Existing and well-functioning regional or national innovation systems designed to support scienceand
technology-based innovation have to be further developed in order to be able to meet new
challenges from emerging global markets for technology and new forms of global knowledgesharing.
Across all countries, governments have recently been involved in research and education;
hence a need for new knowledge and new business skills will also have to be in the focus of
governmental interest. Governments have constantly been called upon to react accordingly and to
adopt innovation-friendly framework conditions. New policy tools have been created to be able to
better meet this challenge.
The regional dimension has also become of increasing significance. Nowadays, regions have come
up with own innovation strategies considering the individual regional strengths instead of spreading
public investments thinly across several frontier technology research fields and, as a consequence,
not making much of an impact.
Innovation policy has to acknowledge that traditional boundaries between manufacturing and
services are increasingly being blurred. The success of manufacturing depends, for instance, very
much on innovative services, such as design, marketing and logistics as well as on product related
after-sales services, and vice versa. More and more service providers are manufacturing goods
that build upon or are related to their service portfolio or distribution channels. But regional and
industrial development policies and tools are still not sufficiently taking account of these changes.
Service innovation is in fact a driver for growth and structural change across the entire economy. It
helps to make the entire economy more productive and provides fuel for innovation in other
industries. It even has the potential to create new growth poles and to lead markets that have a
macro-economic impact.
The so called systematic innovation policy approach, which has recently been introduced in many
industrialised countries, is based on the assumption that an effective innovation policy has to
improve all determinants that influence a given sector-specific innovation system.
The indicator-based Analysis of National Innovation Systems Approach (ANIS), developed by the
Institute for Innovation and Technology (iit Berlin) includes a comprehensive examination and
evaluation of the status of national innovation systems. It is mainly intended for emerging and
developing countries for which standard innovation benchmarking and monitoring approaches
might not be sufficient as statistical data is often missing or outdated. Policy-makers of these
countries can benefit from clear advice on how to overcome weaknesses within their national
innovation system and to identify determinants of specific relevance.
This training on “innovation and societal challenges” is dedicated to policy makers and business support organizations to help them better understand the context and their possible role to face the challenges.
How any organisation can drive culture and design systems to pursue practical...Toby Farren
This whitepaper will provide an insight into the different elements of modern innovation fostering,
including the various factors determining the capability of organisations to innovate internally;
the differences between frontend and backend innovation; and a focus on the relatively new
‘open’ innovation methods (including the advantages of utilizing sandboxes in the frontend
innovation process as well as collaborating with external bodies).
Présentation d'une communication qui prend du recul sur une activité menée par la Scop Acokima, plus précisément par ma collègue Samira OULD-BOUZIAN et moi-même : nous accompagnons la Communauté de Communes de la Plaine Dijonnaise à co-construire son Projet de Territoire, selon une méthode innovante inspirée de Catalyse.
La communauté de communes des Plaines de Dijon (en Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France, dont l’acronyme usuel est CCPD) s’interroge sur ces points, et a décidé de s’engager dans la rédaction d’un document d’orientation politique important : le Projet de Territoire.
Dans une double posture d’accompagnement méthodologique et de recherche-action, cette collectivité nous a demandé d’inventer ensemble la conception et l’écriture collective de ce projet de territoire qui s’apparente à un guide pour l’action publique locale, à une feuille de route opérationnelle adoptée par les élus communautaires.
Nous avons alors imaginé une recherche action faisant appel à la méthodologie Catalyse® (inti.hypotheses.org), structurant une intelligence collective territoriale innovante pour ce territoire. Il s’agit de confronter la vision des élus, des agents, des citoyens et des acteurs locaux du territoire dans deux dimensions : quelle perception de la CCPD expriment-ils individuellement et collectivement ? Quelles projections peuvent-ils imaginer pour les 15 ou 20 ans à venir ? Quels éléments envisagent-ils pour s’accorder sur un projet de territoire commun ? Comment en hiérarchiser les éléments dans l’optique de la transition socio-écologique ?
Dans cette communication, nous nous attacherons à présenter le contexte de la recherche action, la méthodologie imaginée et expérimentée, ainsi que les premiers résultats, puisque le dispositif se terminera au printemps prochain.
Organisé par les laboratoire Sic.lab (Sciences de l'Information et de la Communication) et le GRM (Sciences de Gestion), un workshop a eu lieu à la MSH de Nice le vendredi 29 juin 2018, rassemblant praticiens et universitaires autour d’une problématique commune : les « Pratiques collaboratives et réseaux d’acteurs dans les territoires ».
Cette problématique se décline en trois axes :
1er axe : Gouvernance et réseaux : réseaux d’acteurs de l’innovation, réseaux numériques, pratiques collaboratives,
2ème axe : Identité et valorisation des territoires : esthétique, design, patrimoine et communication
3ème axe Gestion de projets territoriaux : mise en œuvre, engagement des parties prenantes, organisation collaborative.
L'objectif était de présenter une vision SIC de l’intelligence collective territoriale.
De nombreux outils de diffusion de données territoriales existent. Chaque jour, de nouveaux indicateurs de plus en plus fins sont développés et mis à disposition du public comme des décideurs locaux. Ces données et indicateurs sont diffusés via différents portails internet dont l’appropriation par les acteurs est à ce jour difficilement quantifiée et qualifiée. Une étude conjointe entre le Commissariat Général à l’Égalité des Territoires (www.cget.gouv.fr) et le laboratoire CIMEOS – MSH de Dijon, de l’Univ. de Bourgogne Franche-Comté a été lancée en 2016 afin de construire une vision concertée de l’utilisation pratique par les territoires des connaissances produites nationalement, afin d’en comprendre l’impact, d’en évaluer la prégnance dans la construction des politiques publiques au niveau local comme national. Comment des démarches de diagnostic et d’observation s’inscrivent par exemple dans des dynamiques d’intelligence territoriale actées par les acteurs locaux ?
Dans un contexte de quartiers dits « prioritaires », amenés à se transformer au gré des innovations sociales, l’intérêt est ici de comprendre comment les acteurs se sont approprié des outils d’observation du territoire pour affiner leurs stratégies et améliorer la qualité de leurs actions.
Notre enquête, menée auprès d’élus, d’associatifs, de bureaux d’études, comme de producteurs et diffuseurs de données, permet d’éclairer de nouveaux modes de communication organisationnelle. Ce projet, revêtant la forme d’une recherche-action, s’intéresse dans un second volet à la production d’indicateurs par et pour les parties prenantes d’un territoire, à leur implication en amont de la réflexion et de la définition des besoins. Il questionne donc les acteurs sur l’organisation, la production et l’usage des informations territoriales. La méthodologie adoptée combine une enquête par entretiens semi-directifs, de l’analyse des contenus et des discours, et de la veille informationnelle territoriale.
L’analyse des entretiens porte sur la perception des acteurs territoriaux de l’utilisation des données socio-économiques, des indicateurs, et de leur transformation en actions concrètes. Les résultats qui en découlent serviront à la rationalisation des pratiques dans une démarche socio-pragmatique, tournée vers des réalisations s’inscrivant dans la transition socio-écologique.
J'ai été invité par Jean Tkaczuk, président du CCRRDT (Comité consultatif de la Recherche et du Développement Technologique) de la Région Occitanie, et Béatrice Vacher, éminente collègue locale (Mines Albi), à participer au séminaire "Construire une culture cohérente" organisé à Castres, pour y présenter les recherches actuelles en Intelligence Territoriale, au sein du réseau INTI (http://inti.hypotheses.org/), et plus particulièrement la méthode Catalyse (http://www.acokima.org/savoir-faire/la-methode-catalyse/).
Inti17-Usages électoraux des outils numériques marketing-Philippe HaagTerritorial Intelligence
Usages électoraux des outils numériques marketing : nouvelle étape de la marchandisation du politique ? Philippe Haag, doctorant (dris. O. Galibert & C. Masselot)
Résilience d’un quartier populaire : enjeux d’un community management territorial. Retour sur expérience : programme Mocida, quartier de Fontaine d'Ouche, Dijon (Bourgogne, France). Comment mobiliser les citoyens aux comportements éco-responsables ? Cyril Masselot
Présentation de Noémie Fiore, Chargée de Communication pour l’ASBL Monceau-Fontaines, lors de la visite du Pôle d'Economie Sociale du CPAS de Charleroi lors de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Données territoriales en ESS - entre usages et co-constructio...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Cyril MASSELOT, Stéphane DJAHANCHACHI (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté), dans l'Atelier 16 "Intelligence collective et développement des territoires" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Quelle intelligence collective autour des coopérations inter...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Rudy CLAUDOT (CESW), Alexandre MOINE (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté), "Quelle intelligence collective autour des coopérations intercommunales ? Le cas de la wallonie (Belgique)", dans l'Atelier 16 "Intelligence collective et développement des territoires" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
Présentation de Caroline RENOUPREZ, Atout Ei, "Les entreprises d’insertion", dans l'Atelier 15 "Entrepreneuriat social et coopératif-Scop" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161125 Febecoop - Fondamentaux et enjeux actuels de l’entrepreneuria...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Stéphane BOULANGER, Febecoop, "Fondamentaux et enjeux actuels de l’entrepreneuriat coopératif", dans l'Atelier 15 "Entrepreneuriat social et coopératif-Scop" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 La ségrégation professionnelle selon le genre dans l'ESS - ...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Blanca MIEDES UGARTE, Celia SANCHEZ LOPEZ, Manuela A. FERNANDEZ BORRERO (Univ. de Huelva), "La ségrégation professionnelle selon le genre dans l'ESS : le cas des entreprises espagnoles insertion", dans l'Atelier 14 "Economie Sociale et Solidaire et Genre" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
INTI2016 161124 Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et so...Territorial Intelligence
Présentation de Giovanna TRUDA (Univ. de Salerno, Italie), "Les initiatives féminines dans les économies sociales et solidaires et leur implémentations dans le territoire. Une comparaison internationale", dans l'Atelier 14 "Economie Sociale et Solidaire et Genre" de la XVe Conférence Annuelle Internationale INTI « Économie Sociale et Solidaire dans les territoires », 22-25 novembre 2016, Charleroi et Liège, Belgique.
1. Intelligence Territoriale et prospective socio-écologique 24, 25, 26 Mars 2010, Nantes et Rennes A collaborative knowledge platform to promote the implementation of the Regional Innovation Strategy by Olivier Gaussens and Muriel Gilardone CREM UMR CNRS 6211 / MRSH UMS 843, Université de Caen Basse-Normandie. e-mail address: olivier.gaussens@unicaen.fr and muriel.gilardone@unicaen.fr
2. Whatis a collaborative knowledgeplatform ? meta-organizationadapted to «cognitive interactions» betweendifferentactors in ourcontext : SMEntrepreneurs, social scientists, innovation policyimplementers, innovation policymakers to steer the Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS) in a context of «agencyfication» Finally to improve the individual and collective competencies about innovation processus
3. Why a knowledgeplatform to steer the RIS ? Our hypothesis: the actor’sviews, judgements, decisions or actions are based on implicit positions or mental modelswhichconstituteimpediments to the development of innovation The platform, thanksto confrontations of different expertises, should help actors to reconsidertheir initial positions by clarifyingthem to perceive or assess innovation in a more pertinent way
4. A knowledge base for actors’ interactions Composed of indicators and dashboards of synthetic analysis from databases, it allows actors to: 1)position themselves2) stimulate the explicitness of problems and solutions related to innovation 3) build their own tools of steering innovation.
5. database The knowledge base is building from databases : for example, enterprises data emergefrom a representative (random and stratified) sample of 70 regional and industrial SME (Projet IDEIS, CPER-Feder, 2007-2013)
6. 5 entrepreneurs’ positional biaises as impediments to innovation 1) Entrepreneurs have difficulty to assess their own innovative effort 2) Entrepreneurs use a network mainly limited to their professional sphere to access the knowledge 3) Main businesses innovate to increase their competitiveness mainly through innovation-oriented customer satisfaction 4) Entrepreneurs cooperate little to generate new knowledge. 5) Entrepreneurs have difficulty assessing aid policies and innovation support for them.
7. For example Entrepreneurs use a network mainly limited to their professional sphere to access the knowledge : The suppliers (55%), customers (50%) and competitors (50%) are more frequent knowledge sources that the universities (10%), research organizations (5%), or even the bodies of business support (15 %) (open access sources) Patents and norms are not important sources of knowledge The innovation process is opened : it is based on interactions with different actors (“thinking out the box”)
8. For example Entrepreneurs cooperate little to generate new knowledge. They innovate in a rather informal and non cooperative relationship They use more information sources (open access) than sources of knowledge through a cooperative partnership The innovation process is based on knowledge interactions : these require a cooperative framework
9. For example Main businesses innovate to increase their competitiveness mainly through innovation-oriented customer satisfaction. The dominant reasons to innovate appear as the following: "increase or maintain market share“ (80%) and "new markets“ (70%). In contrast, the development of environmentally friendly products is less prominent (65% of enterprises) the “reduction of production costs design” is infrequently evoked, while this factor directly impacts the profitability of innovation. improved sharing or transferring knowledge is not mentioned. The innovation process is based on the economic, social and cultural value creation (innovation efficiency, sustainable development, poverty reduction, better job, competencies and creativity development,…)
10. What action model suitable for innovation policy ? Policy-makers are designing policies based on implicit models of collective action. Innovation policies are built on market failure the corresponding action model is the “allocative innovation” model. For example, the motive for subsidizing research
11. “Allocative model” relevant ? 1) the established facts show (IDEIS survey, 2009) that : non-market incentives to innovate are not very effective The property rights are not as crucial that we advance 2) The “model of allocative innovation” is based on a random, science-technology-pushed model of innovation
12. Policy-makersneedan alternative model Based on a representation of innovation as a process to steerthe Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS) To overcome "apparently" contradictory For example : competitiveness of SMEs vs sustainable development Policy-makers should seek to orient innovation toward the creation of social - and not simply economic value
13. Allocative model and agencyfication : policy implementers 1) it tends to partition the different "policy implementers," 2) it provides little visibility into the real causes of "policy-implementers” performance. The learning platform is the right tool for the deployment of RIS by allowing to effectively coordinate policy-implementers
14. The role of social scientists in the platform Organize the conditions for a collective production of knowledge Help actorsexpliciting and analysingtheirneeds and representations Invoke a widevariety of viewpoints, outlooks and models on innovation, confronte them and try to reach a bettermutualunderstanding Highlightactors’ positional biaises Provide micro and macro evaluationtools
15. Between open and private model of innovation In our view, the pure “private model of innovation”is particularly counterproductive because it doesn’t : overcome positional illusions stimulate cognitive interactions between different actors . In contrast the pure “open science model” enables to avoid the social loss problem but it creates problems with respect to motivating contributors Between the two, the knowledge platform can be considered as a framework adapted to develop innovation for example, the “private collective innovation model”(von Hippel and von Krogh model (2003))