Download as PDF, PPTX
![13
The OA
Citation
Advantage
17
7
46
Studies that found citation advantage
Studies that were inconclusive, found non-significant advantage etc.
Studies that found no citation advantage
Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. (2016) The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; referees: 4 approved, 1 approved with
reservations]. F1000Research 5:632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/31openaccess-190309142015/75/3-1-openaccess-15-2048.jpg)
Uploaded byJulien Colomb
3 1 openaccess
Open access (OA) literature is digital, online, free of charge, and free of most copyright and licensing restrictions. However, only around 28% of scholarly literature is openly accessible. While publishers provide important services like organizing peer review and distribution, they have very high profit margins around 40% for some large publishers. There are barriers to accessing research for most of the world's population. OA options like green (self-archiving) and gold (publication in OA journals) are growing but come with their own challenges and limitations. The future of scholarly publishing is trending towards more open access but change has been slow and new business models are still emerging.
3 1 openaccess
- 1. OpenAccess J u li e n C o l o m b M o d i f i e d f r o m a p r e s e n t a t i o n o f L I S A M AT T H I A S – F R E I E U N I V E R S I T Ä T B E R L I N – @ l _ m a t t h i a
- 2. 2 Open-access (OA) literatureis - digital, - online, - free of charge, and - free of most copyright and licensing restrictions.
- 3. P O WE R 3 How many of you have ever hit a paywall when trying to access a research article?
- 4. 4 video introduction • https://www.youtube.com/watch? time_continue=503&v=L5rVH1KGBCY •License: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) • Not easily accessible (no download button) • No raw data
- 5. 5 M O ST Scholarly research remains inaccessible to most people on this planet. O N LY A R O U N D 2 8 % Of scholarly literature is Open Access. Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. (2018) The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6:e4375 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375 The Access Problem
- 6. 6 “Academic publishing isthe perfect business model to make a lot of money. You have the producer and consumer as the same person: the researcher. And the researcher has no idea how much anything costs.” BRIAN NOSEK U N I V E R S I T Y O F V I R G I N I A , C E N T E R F O R O P E N S C I E N C E
- 7. 7 What do publishersdo ? - organisation of peer review - copy editing editing (xml version creation) - distribution - provide prestige - subscription negotiations and lobbying - create the paywall - create a way to pay to pass the paywall
- 8. 8 Profit Margins 0 10 20 30 40 BMW GoogleApple Springer Elsevier Adapted from https://alexholcombe.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/publisherprofitsincludingplos2015edition1.png
- 9. 9 Economics costs - 400-600 €for publishing a paper - multiplied by the rejection factor price - what people will be ready to pay - prestige has no price (every journal is a monopoly)
- 10. 10 See CC-BY movie: https://paywallthemovie.com
- 11. P O WE R 11 Open Access G O L D ( A P C g o l d , d i a m o n d Publishing your scholarly work in an OA journal or as an OA monograph. G R E E N Providing OA to a version of a work published in a closed-access journal or with a closed-access publisher. B R O N Z E BRONZE: free to read B L A C K BLACK: illegal copies (ResearchGate, sci-hub)
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15. 13 The OA Citation Advantage 17 7 46 Studies thatfound citation advantage Studies that were inconclusive, found non-significant advantage etc. Studies that found no citation advantage Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. (2016) The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; referees: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 5:632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3
- 16. 14 Gold Open Access:Common Concerns PAY I N G TO P U B L I S H Majority of OA journals does not charge APCs. A U T H O R R I G H T S Author rights still protected, granting greater reuse right to readers. AVA I L A B I L I T Y OA articles and monographs subject to the same editorial & peer review standards as closed- access counterparts. Q U A L I T Y OA does not influence print sales. Consult publisher. R O YA LT I E S Considerable differences regarding the availability of OA journals.
- 17. 15 Early-career researchers • Whatdo we want? And build our academic profile. G E T P U B L I S H E D … F I N I S H T H AT D I S S E R TAT I O N Within or outside of academia. F I N D A P E R M A N E N T J O B
- 18. 16 Green Open Access:Common Practices W H E N & W H AT Check the publisher’s self-archiving policies to know when & which version you are allowed to deposit. W H E R E Institutional or disciplinary repositories
- 19. 16 Green Open Access:Common Practices • Preprints • Bioarchive • peerJ preprints • … W H E N & W H AT Check the publisher’s self-archiving policies to know when & which version you are allowed to deposit. W H E R E Institutional or disciplinary repositories
- 20. 17 30 Citations 28Citations PREPRINT JOURNAL ARTICLE https://www.altmetric.com/details/23358582 https://www.altmetric.com/details/33152539
- 21. 18 SUPPORTS EXPORT & HARVESTING LONG-TERM PRESERVATION BUSINESSMODEL FULFILLS FUNDER OA POLICIES N o N o Ye s N o N o Ye s C o m m e r c i a l C o m m e r c i a l N o n - p r o f i t N o N o Ye s Adapted from: https://openreflections.wordpress.com/2017/05/09/academia-edu-and-self-branding
- 22. P O WE R 19
- 23. 20 Benefits of OpenAccess Fast communication Maximize visibility (and therefore citation) Facilitate collaboration Increase efficiency
- 24. P O WE R 21
- 25.
- 26. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper !
- 27. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs
- 28. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change
- 29. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news
- 30. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA
- 31. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands
- 32. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands • The industry is changing fast
- 33. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands • The industry is changing fast • PloS was a huge commercial success = to be copied
- 34. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands • The industry is changing fast • PloS was a huge commercial success = to be copied • New business models are developed
- 35. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands • The industry is changing fast • PloS was a huge commercial success = to be copied • New business models are developed • Open peer review is coming
- 36. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands • The industry is changing fast • PloS was a huge commercial success = to be copied • New business models are developed • Open peer review is coming • Eventually, we will achieve full, free OA
- 37. 22 The future ? •Gold OA may not be cheaper ! • It is a monopoly industry: prices do not go along costs • The pressure to publish in "high impact journals" did not change • Good news • Funders are pushing for OA • DORA: limiting the importance of journal brands • The industry is changing fast • PloS was a huge commercial success = to be copied • New business models are developed • Open peer review is coming • Eventually, we will achieve full, free OA Because YOU will not care about journal prestige!