http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXheUzoCciw
(0:00 – 0:38)
Transtibial Prosthetics
for Developing
Countries
A Comparative Analysis with the 2ft
Prosthetic Foot
Background Info
• There is a Need!
o Huge demand due to land mines and disease
o Most cannot receive prosthetics
o Prosthetics that are available are not meeting needs
• BYU 2ft Prosthetics
o Designed a prosthetic to address the needs that aren’t being met
o Competitive with current prosthetic market
• Purpose: To Evaluate the 2ft Prosthetic Foot
1. Establish Needs of Amputees
2. Compare Current Market and 2ft Prosthetics
3. Recommend Best Option
Before We Begin…
General Needs of a
“Developing Country”
o Large rural population
o Low per capita income
o Health care unable to meet
needs
Transtibial Prosthetic
“Below-the-Knee”
Socket
Component
Foot
Needs of Developing
Countries
4. Durability
o Unpaved paths
o Environmental conditions
o Sturdy materials
5. Cleanliness and
Comfort
o Prevent infection/fungus
o Protect limb
o Allow hard work for long
periods of time
1. Cost
o Family annual income $200-300
o Their $40 = Our $20,000
2. Availability
o Product availability
o Clinic/tool availability
3. Functionality and
Aesthetics
o Put back to rural work
o Act as a normal foot
o Prevent “partial human”
treatment
Peg Leg
PVC/wooden foot
Jaipur foot
Monolimb/
SACH foot2ft Prosthetic foot
Peg Leg Advantages
o Cheap, local materials
o Very simple design
o Easy to replace
Disadvantages
o Poor functionality
o Poor aesthetic
o Not very durable
o Uncomfortable
o Hard to clean plaster
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
Peg Leg 10 10 3 3 2 28
PVC/Wooden Foot Advantages
o Cheap, local materials
o Fairly simple design
o Somewhat easy to replace
o Some surface area
Disadvantages
o Wood degrade and break
o Not very durable
o Uncomfortable
o Hard to clean plaster
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
PVC/wood 8 8 5 4 3 28
Jaipur Foot Advantages
o Very functional
o Smooth
o Human look
o Durable
o Comfortable
Disadvantages
o Expensive
o Specially trained and
equipped clinics
o Complicated design
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
Jaipur 2 5 10 8 8 33
Monolimb with
SACH Foot
Advantages
o Fair functionality
o Looks fairly human
o Quick manufacturing
o Durable plastic
Disadvantages
o Expensive
o Special equipment
o Heat damage
o SACH foot is not very
functional
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
Monolimb 1 4 7 6 6 24
2ft Prosthetic Foot
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
2ft Prosthetic 6 7 8 8 9 38
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RDSeAeQ614
(2:27 – 2:59)
2ft Prosthetic Foot Advantages
o Cheap, local materials
o Simple design, easy to
make
o Functional
o Biomechanics like foot
o Durable
o Clean
Disadvantages
o Moderate cost
o Require some training
o Doesn’t look very human
Cost Availability
Functionality/
Aesthetics
Durability
Cleanliness/
Comfort
Total
2ft Prosthetic 6 7 8 8 9 38
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Peg Leg PVC/wood Jaipur Monolimb 2ft. Prosthetic
Total Score
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Peg Leg PVC/wood Jaipur Monolimb 2ft. Prosthetic
Score of Each
Criteria
Cost
Availability
Functionality
Durability
Cleanliness
Conclusion
2ft Prosthetic design is well-
rounded, simple, and
affordable.
This can be the difference
between a sedentary and
solitary life, and an active
and fulfilling one.
This reflects the heart of the
2ft Prosthetic mantra, which
is “Bringing hope to
amputees, one leg at a
time.”
Peg Leg
PVC/wooden foot
Jaipur foot
Monolimb/
SACH foot2ft Prosthetic foot
Thank You!
Questions?

2ft Comparison Presentation

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Transtibial Prosthetics for Developing Countries AComparative Analysis with the 2ft Prosthetic Foot
  • 3.
    Background Info • Thereis a Need! o Huge demand due to land mines and disease o Most cannot receive prosthetics o Prosthetics that are available are not meeting needs • BYU 2ft Prosthetics o Designed a prosthetic to address the needs that aren’t being met o Competitive with current prosthetic market • Purpose: To Evaluate the 2ft Prosthetic Foot 1. Establish Needs of Amputees 2. Compare Current Market and 2ft Prosthetics 3. Recommend Best Option
  • 4.
    Before We Begin… GeneralNeeds of a “Developing Country” o Large rural population o Low per capita income o Health care unable to meet needs Transtibial Prosthetic “Below-the-Knee” Socket Component Foot
  • 5.
    Needs of Developing Countries 4.Durability o Unpaved paths o Environmental conditions o Sturdy materials 5. Cleanliness and Comfort o Prevent infection/fungus o Protect limb o Allow hard work for long periods of time 1. Cost o Family annual income $200-300 o Their $40 = Our $20,000 2. Availability o Product availability o Clinic/tool availability 3. Functionality and Aesthetics o Put back to rural work o Act as a normal foot o Prevent “partial human” treatment
  • 6.
    Peg Leg PVC/wooden foot Jaipurfoot Monolimb/ SACH foot2ft Prosthetic foot
  • 7.
    Peg Leg Advantages oCheap, local materials o Very simple design o Easy to replace Disadvantages o Poor functionality o Poor aesthetic o Not very durable o Uncomfortable o Hard to clean plaster Cost Availability Functionality/ Aesthetics Durability Cleanliness/ Comfort Total Peg Leg 10 10 3 3 2 28
  • 8.
    PVC/Wooden Foot Advantages oCheap, local materials o Fairly simple design o Somewhat easy to replace o Some surface area Disadvantages o Wood degrade and break o Not very durable o Uncomfortable o Hard to clean plaster Cost Availability Functionality/ Aesthetics Durability Cleanliness/ Comfort Total PVC/wood 8 8 5 4 3 28
  • 9.
    Jaipur Foot Advantages oVery functional o Smooth o Human look o Durable o Comfortable Disadvantages o Expensive o Specially trained and equipped clinics o Complicated design Cost Availability Functionality/ Aesthetics Durability Cleanliness/ Comfort Total Jaipur 2 5 10 8 8 33
  • 10.
    Monolimb with SACH Foot Advantages oFair functionality o Looks fairly human o Quick manufacturing o Durable plastic Disadvantages o Expensive o Special equipment o Heat damage o SACH foot is not very functional Cost Availability Functionality/ Aesthetics Durability Cleanliness/ Comfort Total Monolimb 1 4 7 6 6 24
  • 11.
    2ft Prosthetic Foot CostAvailability Functionality/ Aesthetics Durability Cleanliness/ Comfort Total 2ft Prosthetic 6 7 8 8 9 38 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4RDSeAeQ614 (2:27 – 2:59)
  • 12.
    2ft Prosthetic FootAdvantages o Cheap, local materials o Simple design, easy to make o Functional o Biomechanics like foot o Durable o Clean Disadvantages o Moderate cost o Require some training o Doesn’t look very human Cost Availability Functionality/ Aesthetics Durability Cleanliness/ Comfort Total 2ft Prosthetic 6 7 8 8 9 38
  • 13.
    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Peg Leg PVC/woodJaipur Monolimb 2ft. Prosthetic Total Score 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Peg Leg PVC/wood Jaipur Monolimb 2ft. Prosthetic Score of Each Criteria Cost Availability Functionality Durability Cleanliness
  • 14.
    Conclusion 2ft Prosthetic designis well- rounded, simple, and affordable. This can be the difference between a sedentary and solitary life, and an active and fulfilling one. This reflects the heart of the 2ft Prosthetic mantra, which is “Bringing hope to amputees, one leg at a time.”
  • 15.
    Peg Leg PVC/wooden foot Jaipurfoot Monolimb/ SACH foot2ft Prosthetic foot Thank You! Questions?