Right to Information Act and Record Management System in Bangladesh
Muhammad Lutful Haq
Archives without borders
August, 30th 2010
Peace Palace, The Hague
Regional Conference on Status of RTI In South AsiaRuhi Naz
This document summarizes the emergence and status of Right to Information (RTI) laws in Bangladesh after six years of implementation. Key points include:
- RTI was first adopted in 2008 and passed into law in 2009, though it was not the result of public movement but pressure from civil society organizations.
- While RTI raised hopes for transparency, awareness remains low and government was initially indifferent, though initiatives now show promise of more open governance.
- Use of RTI has increased but encompassing issues of transparency and corruption remain challenging. Continued efforts are needed from all sides to strengthen commitment and ensure the law achieves its objectives.
Right to information and its practices in nepalMira LC
Nepal is among 50 countries of the world to guarantee Right to Information constitutionally as well as has a separate and specific legislation on right to information.
Right to Information (RTI) in Nepal establishes people's sovereignty and promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance. The citizens' campaign for an RTI Act in Nepal was an effective advocacy example, engaging stakeholders in a non-confrontational approach with experts and activists. The key features of Nepal's RTI include an RTI commission, provisions for information officers, time-bound responses, and financial penalties for non-compliance. However, challenges remain as some rules protect bureaucrats' interests, and there is a need to increase demand and build supply-side capacity as institutionalization is still early.
The document provides an overview of right to information (RTI) legislation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. It discusses the background of RTI laws internationally and in Pakistan. It then summarizes the key aspects of the new RTI law passed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2013, including that it mandates proactive disclosure of information, establishes a process for information requests, exempts some information, sets up an independent information commission to handle complaints, and includes protections for whistleblowers.
Right to Information (RTI) - South Asian Regional Experiences - by Nalaka Gun...Nalaka Gunawardene
Right to Information (RTI): South Asian Experiences
Presentation by Nalaka Gunawardene, science writer and new media researcher, at the RTI awareness seminar for senior staff of the Parliament of Sri Lanka on 16 August 2016.
Sri Lanka’s Parliament passed the Right to Information (RTI) law on 24 June 2016. Over 15 years in the making, the RTI law represents a potential transformation across the whole government by opening up hitherto closed public information (with certain clearly specified exceptions related to national security, trade secrets, privacy and intellectual property, etc.).
This presentation introduces the concept of citizens’ right to demand and access public information held by the government, and traces the evolution of the concept from historical time. In fact, Indian Emperor Ashoka (who reigned from c. 268 to 232 Before Christ) was the first to grant his subjects the Right to Information (RTI), according to Indian RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak, Coordinator, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI). Ashoka had inscribed on rocks all over the Indian subcontinent his government’s policies, development programmes and his ideas on various social, economic and political issues -- including how religious co-existence.
Therefore, adopting an RTI law signifies upholding a great Ashokan tradition in Sri Lanka. The presentation looks at RTI good practices and implementation experiences in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Maldives – all these South Asian countries passed an RTI law before Sri Lanka, and there is much that Sri Lanka can learn from them.
The presentation ends acknowledging the big challenges in implementing RTI in Sri Lanka – reorienting the entire public sector to change its mindset and practices to promote a culture of information sharing and transparent government.
Access to information in Middle east and north Africa Hayder Hamzoz
This document provides an overview of access to information laws and developments in Jordan. Key points include:
- Jordan passed an access to information law in 2007, but it has many limitations and has not led to greater government transparency.
- Other laws, such as those around state secrets and cybercrime, conflict with the access to information law and limit its effectiveness.
- Government initiatives to amend laws and address gaps have faced delays and lack of progress.
- Civil society groups have called for stronger access to information laws and greater openness from the government.
Right to Information acts as a great tool to effect transparency and fix accountability on the concerned public authorities. We must understand how to file RTI to get empowered
The document discusses the proposed 2013 amendments to India's Right to Information Act. It provides background on the genesis and purpose of the original RTI Act, including promoting transparency, accountability, and empowering citizens. The key proposed amendment would exempt political parties registered under the Representation of People's Act from being defined as public authorities, shielding them from RTI requests. Views were mixed in the group discussion, with some arguing the amendment should be publicly debated and others concerned it could hide political funding sources.
Regional Conference on Status of RTI In South AsiaRuhi Naz
This document summarizes the emergence and status of Right to Information (RTI) laws in Bangladesh after six years of implementation. Key points include:
- RTI was first adopted in 2008 and passed into law in 2009, though it was not the result of public movement but pressure from civil society organizations.
- While RTI raised hopes for transparency, awareness remains low and government was initially indifferent, though initiatives now show promise of more open governance.
- Use of RTI has increased but encompassing issues of transparency and corruption remain challenging. Continued efforts are needed from all sides to strengthen commitment and ensure the law achieves its objectives.
Right to information and its practices in nepalMira LC
Nepal is among 50 countries of the world to guarantee Right to Information constitutionally as well as has a separate and specific legislation on right to information.
Right to Information (RTI) in Nepal establishes people's sovereignty and promotes transparency, accountability, and good governance. The citizens' campaign for an RTI Act in Nepal was an effective advocacy example, engaging stakeholders in a non-confrontational approach with experts and activists. The key features of Nepal's RTI include an RTI commission, provisions for information officers, time-bound responses, and financial penalties for non-compliance. However, challenges remain as some rules protect bureaucrats' interests, and there is a need to increase demand and build supply-side capacity as institutionalization is still early.
The document provides an overview of right to information (RTI) legislation in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. It discusses the background of RTI laws internationally and in Pakistan. It then summarizes the key aspects of the new RTI law passed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in 2013, including that it mandates proactive disclosure of information, establishes a process for information requests, exempts some information, sets up an independent information commission to handle complaints, and includes protections for whistleblowers.
Right to Information (RTI) - South Asian Regional Experiences - by Nalaka Gun...Nalaka Gunawardene
Right to Information (RTI): South Asian Experiences
Presentation by Nalaka Gunawardene, science writer and new media researcher, at the RTI awareness seminar for senior staff of the Parliament of Sri Lanka on 16 August 2016.
Sri Lanka’s Parliament passed the Right to Information (RTI) law on 24 June 2016. Over 15 years in the making, the RTI law represents a potential transformation across the whole government by opening up hitherto closed public information (with certain clearly specified exceptions related to national security, trade secrets, privacy and intellectual property, etc.).
This presentation introduces the concept of citizens’ right to demand and access public information held by the government, and traces the evolution of the concept from historical time. In fact, Indian Emperor Ashoka (who reigned from c. 268 to 232 Before Christ) was the first to grant his subjects the Right to Information (RTI), according to Indian RTI activist Venkatesh Nayak, Coordinator, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative (CHRI). Ashoka had inscribed on rocks all over the Indian subcontinent his government’s policies, development programmes and his ideas on various social, economic and political issues -- including how religious co-existence.
Therefore, adopting an RTI law signifies upholding a great Ashokan tradition in Sri Lanka. The presentation looks at RTI good practices and implementation experiences in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Maldives – all these South Asian countries passed an RTI law before Sri Lanka, and there is much that Sri Lanka can learn from them.
The presentation ends acknowledging the big challenges in implementing RTI in Sri Lanka – reorienting the entire public sector to change its mindset and practices to promote a culture of information sharing and transparent government.
Access to information in Middle east and north Africa Hayder Hamzoz
This document provides an overview of access to information laws and developments in Jordan. Key points include:
- Jordan passed an access to information law in 2007, but it has many limitations and has not led to greater government transparency.
- Other laws, such as those around state secrets and cybercrime, conflict with the access to information law and limit its effectiveness.
- Government initiatives to amend laws and address gaps have faced delays and lack of progress.
- Civil society groups have called for stronger access to information laws and greater openness from the government.
Right to Information acts as a great tool to effect transparency and fix accountability on the concerned public authorities. We must understand how to file RTI to get empowered
The document discusses the proposed 2013 amendments to India's Right to Information Act. It provides background on the genesis and purpose of the original RTI Act, including promoting transparency, accountability, and empowering citizens. The key proposed amendment would exempt political parties registered under the Representation of People's Act from being defined as public authorities, shielding them from RTI requests. Views were mixed in the group discussion, with some arguing the amendment should be publicly debated and others concerned it could hide political funding sources.
The document discusses the Right to Information (RTI) Act in India. It notes that the legislative intent of the Act was to promote transparency, accountability, and good governance by giving citizens access to information held by public authorities. However, it argues that more needs to be done to ensure public authorities properly implement the Act through compliance monitoring and redefining ambiguous definitions. The document concludes by thanking the reader and emphasizing that the overall objective of the RTI Act is to enhance good governance in India.
The document discusses India's Right to Information Act of 2005. It defines the RTI Act and outlines its key objectives like increasing transparency, accountability, and reducing corruption. The summary also notes that the RTI Act applies across India except Jammu and Kashmir and covers constitutional authorities and government-funded bodies. It also outlines some of the main features of the RTI Act like its two-tier appeal process and the roles of central and state information commissions.
The Right to Information Act was enacted in 2005 to promote transparency and accountability in government. It relaxed restrictions on information disclosure that were previously imposed by laws like the Official Secrets Act. To effectively exercise rights under the Act, public awareness is important. Various institutions like educational institutions, government bodies, NGOs and the Central Information Commission have undertaken initiatives to educate the public about the Act through workshops, seminars, curriculum inclusion and awareness campaigns using materials like posters, pamphlets and advertisements. Widespread dissemination of information about the public's right to information is necessary to strengthen participatory democracy and good governance.
The Indian judiciary faces significant challenges including a large backlog of over 3 crore pending cases. With only 13 judges per 10 lakh citizens, far below international standards, the judicial system is overwhelmed. While alternative dispute resolution and efforts by judges have reduced the backlog somewhat, delays of 15 years for civil cases undermine justice. Recommendations to address the issues include increasing judges, prioritizing cases, implementing time bounds, developing infrastructure and legal training, implementing information technology for transparency, and ensuring adequate budgets. Successful implementation of these recommendations could help clear a large portion of the backlog and improve the functioning of the Indian judicial system.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses the historical context leading to the passage of the Act, including constitutional provisions and civil society initiatives. It outlines the objectives of the Act to promote transparency and accountability. It describes the obligations of public authorities under the Act, including proactive disclosures, designation of PIOs, timelines for responding to requests, exemptions, penalties for non-compliance, and responsibilities around public awareness. The Act aims to empower citizens with access to information held by public bodies.
Presentation by Hemant Goswami on RTI and Human RIghts. This is part of the
talk delivered by Hemant Goswami in Punjab University Chandigarh on March 5,
2010.
UPSC aspirants who are a part of Vajirao IAS Academy or even aspirants who are not can follow our "Indian Governance Class Notes" to get a thorough guidance for UPSC CSE examinations. We specifically assign the task of writing the class notes to people who are experts in writing without any error. These notes are updated on our website on a regular basis and can be downloaded without paying any fees. Here’s the link to follow for Vajirao IAS Academy class notes.
https://www.vajiraoiasacademy.com/class-notes/
This presentation on The RTI Act 2005 is for general understanding of the netizens. The act was enacted to upheld Transparency & Accountability in Public offices.
The document summarizes the public administration system of Bangladesh. It describes how Bangladesh inherited a colonial legacy from British rule and later Pakistani domination. The current system has three branches - executive, legislative, and judicial. The bureaucracy plays an essential role in governance. Reforms have been proposed but not fully implemented to make the administration more efficient, citizen-oriented, and transparent. Political will and government capacity are needed to carry out effective administrative reforms.
WHAT IS 'RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT' OF INDIA? DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGHT...`Shweta Bhavsar
This document discusses the Right to Information Act of India. It begins with an introduction that defines key terms like information, public information officer, and public authority as defined by the Act. It then discusses the history and objectives of the Act, including increasing transparency and reducing corruption. The importance of the Act for good governance is discussed, noting its role in accountability, participation, and reducing corruption. Features of the Act are outlined, including timelines for responses, appeal processes, and oversight bodies. Finally, some challenges of implementation are described, such as lack of training, poor record keeping, and differences between states.
Kenya has made strides in becoming a more democratic and open society since 1991, as outlined in its Vision 2030 Plan and revised 2010 Constitution. This document discusses Kenya's strategy for developing an Open Government Partnership, including establishing a working group and holding consultations to create an inclusive National Open Government Action Plan. It also outlines several ongoing government initiatives to improve transparency, public services, and civic participation.
The Right to Information Act 2005 provides Indian citizens the right to access information from public authorities. It aims to promote transparency and accountability in government. Key features include:
- Citizens can request information from public authorities in writing or electronically.
- Authorities must respond within 30 days, or 48 hours for information involving life or liberty.
- Certain types of information like cabinet papers and intelligence agency records are exempt.
- Central and State Information Commissions were established to hear appeals for information requests.
22 transparency desk under right to information act 2225Sandeep Mahatme
This document describes the implementation of a "Transparency Desk" initiative in SDM Gandachera, Tripura to improve proactive disclosure of information under Section 4 of the Right to Information Act. Key points:
- The Transparency Desk collects and makes available information from 22 government departments in one location for public access without fees.
- Initial problems with poor quality and incomplete information from some departments were addressed.
- Appointing staff fluent in local languages helps provide information to illiterate citizens.
- The initiative aims to increase transparency, accountability and trust in government while reducing RTI applications and costs to the administration.
Health Information Technology and Open Government PolicyJeff Smith
This is a descriptive (Yin, 2003) instrumental (Stake, 1995) case study that sought to answer the basic question, How is ONC complying with the Obama administration’s Open Government initiatives? Goals associated with the study include:
• To understand how various activities and programs align with the administration’s goals of promoting more transparent, participatory and collaborative government
• To identify definitional themes of “Open Government” as illustrated by stakeholders inside and outside of ONC
• To explore how data are being used “downstream” to:
o Inform policy decisions;
o Enhance research; and / or
o Promote innovation
• To propose a conceptual framework through which ONC and other government agencies could assess current and future Open Government initiatives
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It discusses what RTI is, the need for the act, who is covered under the act, how to file an RTI application, the roles of Public Information Officers, the time frame for disposing requests, and some case studies of students using RTI to access exam answer sheets and address issues like garbage disposal and tobacco shops near schools. It also discusses how over Rs. 2,490 crore in tax exemptions were given to political parties based on an RTI request, and provides some conclusions on the impact and future of the RTI Act in India.
1) The document discusses communication channels and barriers within the Nigerian public service. It outlines various written (e.g. memorandums, reports), oral (e.g. meetings, seminars), and non-verbal communication methods used.
2) Barriers to effective communication include psychological factors, physical distance, social distance, and semantic issues. Official barriers are also created by strict secrecy rules.
3) The document concludes with recommendations to abide by the Code of Conduct and relevant rules and regulations to maintain integrity and good public service.
Bureaucratic reform has been declared a priority in Indonesia to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The government has identified five major problems with the current bureaucracy: overly large and overlapping organizational structures, lack of competent staff, poor coordination between administrative systems, low quality public services, and overlapping laws. To address these, the government is accelerating reforms through nine programs until 2014, including restructuring organizations and staffing, improving selection processes, increasing professionalism, strengthening e-government, and enhancing accountability and integrity. The goal is to minimize issues and build public trust in government through a more efficient and effective administration.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is widely hailed to be one of the best enactments concerning access to information to public, with an excellent implementation record. The soul of the RTI Act can be understood by its Preamble- "Democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the
governed". Keeping this goal in mind this presentation would strive to describe the ambit and scope of the RTI Act by categorizing the relevant provisions of the Act under four distinct blocks. The first block includes all provisions related to the Right to Access in context of the 'information’, 'public authority', 'record', 'right to information' under Sections 2 and 3 and the interpretation accorded to the same by the State Information Commissions, Central Information Commission and the various High Courts and the Supreme Court during the last decade . The second block includes provisions dealing with the Procedural Guarantees that ensure an application to the PIO seeking information that can be disclosed under this Act is efficiently and effectively disposed of. The third block deals with provisions related to exceptions from disclosing the information which are listed out in Sections 8, 9, 10, 11 and 24 of the Act. However, these exceptions come with some provisos under which the information exempted can be disclosed under certain circumstances and one such prime reason as seen in judicial pronouncements is ‘The Larger Public Interest’. The fourth block deals with the provisions related to Appeals, Sanctions and Protections. Further, the presentation will substantiate relevant case laws where the RTI Act has indeed helped citizens realize the principles enshrined in the Preamble and will highlight the challenges confronting the RTI and also suggest ways to move forward.
The Right to Information Act (RTI) was enacted in 2005 to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities and promote transparency. It defines public authorities broadly and mandates that requests be answered within 30 days. Citizens can request information in the form of documents, reports, contracts, and more. The RTI has been very effective in uncovering corruption, though some information like national security and cabinet papers is exempt. It has faced challenges due to attacks on activists exposing wrongdoing. While very impactful, its potential remains underutilized, especially by the media.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 ,FULL THEORY-MANPREET SINGH (B.COM)MANPREETSINGHPANESAR1
Right to information act 2005, all theory considered features ,merits ,demerits and functions etc.in briefly explained in this content . thanks for viewing this topic and do not forget to hit the like button ....
The document discusses the Right to Information (RTI) Act in India. It notes that the legislative intent of the Act was to promote transparency, accountability, and good governance by giving citizens access to information held by public authorities. However, it argues that more needs to be done to ensure public authorities properly implement the Act through compliance monitoring and redefining ambiguous definitions. The document concludes by thanking the reader and emphasizing that the overall objective of the RTI Act is to enhance good governance in India.
The document discusses India's Right to Information Act of 2005. It defines the RTI Act and outlines its key objectives like increasing transparency, accountability, and reducing corruption. The summary also notes that the RTI Act applies across India except Jammu and Kashmir and covers constitutional authorities and government-funded bodies. It also outlines some of the main features of the RTI Act like its two-tier appeal process and the roles of central and state information commissions.
The Right to Information Act was enacted in 2005 to promote transparency and accountability in government. It relaxed restrictions on information disclosure that were previously imposed by laws like the Official Secrets Act. To effectively exercise rights under the Act, public awareness is important. Various institutions like educational institutions, government bodies, NGOs and the Central Information Commission have undertaken initiatives to educate the public about the Act through workshops, seminars, curriculum inclusion and awareness campaigns using materials like posters, pamphlets and advertisements. Widespread dissemination of information about the public's right to information is necessary to strengthen participatory democracy and good governance.
The Indian judiciary faces significant challenges including a large backlog of over 3 crore pending cases. With only 13 judges per 10 lakh citizens, far below international standards, the judicial system is overwhelmed. While alternative dispute resolution and efforts by judges have reduced the backlog somewhat, delays of 15 years for civil cases undermine justice. Recommendations to address the issues include increasing judges, prioritizing cases, implementing time bounds, developing infrastructure and legal training, implementing information technology for transparency, and ensuring adequate budgets. Successful implementation of these recommendations could help clear a large portion of the backlog and improve the functioning of the Indian judicial system.
The document summarizes key aspects of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses the historical context leading to the passage of the Act, including constitutional provisions and civil society initiatives. It outlines the objectives of the Act to promote transparency and accountability. It describes the obligations of public authorities under the Act, including proactive disclosures, designation of PIOs, timelines for responding to requests, exemptions, penalties for non-compliance, and responsibilities around public awareness. The Act aims to empower citizens with access to information held by public bodies.
Presentation by Hemant Goswami on RTI and Human RIghts. This is part of the
talk delivered by Hemant Goswami in Punjab University Chandigarh on March 5,
2010.
UPSC aspirants who are a part of Vajirao IAS Academy or even aspirants who are not can follow our "Indian Governance Class Notes" to get a thorough guidance for UPSC CSE examinations. We specifically assign the task of writing the class notes to people who are experts in writing without any error. These notes are updated on our website on a regular basis and can be downloaded without paying any fees. Here’s the link to follow for Vajirao IAS Academy class notes.
https://www.vajiraoiasacademy.com/class-notes/
This presentation on The RTI Act 2005 is for general understanding of the netizens. The act was enacted to upheld Transparency & Accountability in Public offices.
The document summarizes the public administration system of Bangladesh. It describes how Bangladesh inherited a colonial legacy from British rule and later Pakistani domination. The current system has three branches - executive, legislative, and judicial. The bureaucracy plays an essential role in governance. Reforms have been proposed but not fully implemented to make the administration more efficient, citizen-oriented, and transparent. Political will and government capacity are needed to carry out effective administrative reforms.
WHAT IS 'RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT' OF INDIA? DISCUSS THE IMPORTANCE OF RIGHT...`Shweta Bhavsar
This document discusses the Right to Information Act of India. It begins with an introduction that defines key terms like information, public information officer, and public authority as defined by the Act. It then discusses the history and objectives of the Act, including increasing transparency and reducing corruption. The importance of the Act for good governance is discussed, noting its role in accountability, participation, and reducing corruption. Features of the Act are outlined, including timelines for responses, appeal processes, and oversight bodies. Finally, some challenges of implementation are described, such as lack of training, poor record keeping, and differences between states.
Kenya has made strides in becoming a more democratic and open society since 1991, as outlined in its Vision 2030 Plan and revised 2010 Constitution. This document discusses Kenya's strategy for developing an Open Government Partnership, including establishing a working group and holding consultations to create an inclusive National Open Government Action Plan. It also outlines several ongoing government initiatives to improve transparency, public services, and civic participation.
The Right to Information Act 2005 provides Indian citizens the right to access information from public authorities. It aims to promote transparency and accountability in government. Key features include:
- Citizens can request information from public authorities in writing or electronically.
- Authorities must respond within 30 days, or 48 hours for information involving life or liberty.
- Certain types of information like cabinet papers and intelligence agency records are exempt.
- Central and State Information Commissions were established to hear appeals for information requests.
22 transparency desk under right to information act 2225Sandeep Mahatme
This document describes the implementation of a "Transparency Desk" initiative in SDM Gandachera, Tripura to improve proactive disclosure of information under Section 4 of the Right to Information Act. Key points:
- The Transparency Desk collects and makes available information from 22 government departments in one location for public access without fees.
- Initial problems with poor quality and incomplete information from some departments were addressed.
- Appointing staff fluent in local languages helps provide information to illiterate citizens.
- The initiative aims to increase transparency, accountability and trust in government while reducing RTI applications and costs to the administration.
Health Information Technology and Open Government PolicyJeff Smith
This is a descriptive (Yin, 2003) instrumental (Stake, 1995) case study that sought to answer the basic question, How is ONC complying with the Obama administration’s Open Government initiatives? Goals associated with the study include:
• To understand how various activities and programs align with the administration’s goals of promoting more transparent, participatory and collaborative government
• To identify definitional themes of “Open Government” as illustrated by stakeholders inside and outside of ONC
• To explore how data are being used “downstream” to:
o Inform policy decisions;
o Enhance research; and / or
o Promote innovation
• To propose a conceptual framework through which ONC and other government agencies could assess current and future Open Government initiatives
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act of 2005 in India. It discusses what RTI is, the need for the act, who is covered under the act, how to file an RTI application, the roles of Public Information Officers, the time frame for disposing requests, and some case studies of students using RTI to access exam answer sheets and address issues like garbage disposal and tobacco shops near schools. It also discusses how over Rs. 2,490 crore in tax exemptions were given to political parties based on an RTI request, and provides some conclusions on the impact and future of the RTI Act in India.
1) The document discusses communication channels and barriers within the Nigerian public service. It outlines various written (e.g. memorandums, reports), oral (e.g. meetings, seminars), and non-verbal communication methods used.
2) Barriers to effective communication include psychological factors, physical distance, social distance, and semantic issues. Official barriers are also created by strict secrecy rules.
3) The document concludes with recommendations to abide by the Code of Conduct and relevant rules and regulations to maintain integrity and good public service.
Bureaucratic reform has been declared a priority in Indonesia to improve efficiency and effectiveness. The government has identified five major problems with the current bureaucracy: overly large and overlapping organizational structures, lack of competent staff, poor coordination between administrative systems, low quality public services, and overlapping laws. To address these, the government is accelerating reforms through nine programs until 2014, including restructuring organizations and staffing, improving selection processes, increasing professionalism, strengthening e-government, and enhancing accountability and integrity. The goal is to minimize issues and build public trust in government through a more efficient and effective administration.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 is widely hailed to be one of the best enactments concerning access to information to public, with an excellent implementation record. The soul of the RTI Act can be understood by its Preamble- "Democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the
governed". Keeping this goal in mind this presentation would strive to describe the ambit and scope of the RTI Act by categorizing the relevant provisions of the Act under four distinct blocks. The first block includes all provisions related to the Right to Access in context of the 'information’, 'public authority', 'record', 'right to information' under Sections 2 and 3 and the interpretation accorded to the same by the State Information Commissions, Central Information Commission and the various High Courts and the Supreme Court during the last decade . The second block includes provisions dealing with the Procedural Guarantees that ensure an application to the PIO seeking information that can be disclosed under this Act is efficiently and effectively disposed of. The third block deals with provisions related to exceptions from disclosing the information which are listed out in Sections 8, 9, 10, 11 and 24 of the Act. However, these exceptions come with some provisos under which the information exempted can be disclosed under certain circumstances and one such prime reason as seen in judicial pronouncements is ‘The Larger Public Interest’. The fourth block deals with the provisions related to Appeals, Sanctions and Protections. Further, the presentation will substantiate relevant case laws where the RTI Act has indeed helped citizens realize the principles enshrined in the Preamble and will highlight the challenges confronting the RTI and also suggest ways to move forward.
The Right to Information Act (RTI) was enacted in 2005 to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities and promote transparency. It defines public authorities broadly and mandates that requests be answered within 30 days. Citizens can request information in the form of documents, reports, contracts, and more. The RTI has been very effective in uncovering corruption, though some information like national security and cabinet papers is exempt. It has faced challenges due to attacks on activists exposing wrongdoing. While very impactful, its potential remains underutilized, especially by the media.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 ,FULL THEORY-MANPREET SINGH (B.COM)MANPREETSINGHPANESAR1
Right to information act 2005, all theory considered features ,merits ,demerits and functions etc.in briefly explained in this content . thanks for viewing this topic and do not forget to hit the like button ....
The document provides information about the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses that the Act aims to promote transparency and accountability in government functioning. It defines key terms like right to information, public authority, application process and timelines. It also outlines exemptions to disclosure, penalty provisions, and implications of the Act in increasing transparency, reducing corruption and making governments more accountable. Examples of how RTI has revealed scams and irregularities in projects like Adarsh Society and PDS are also given.
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act in India. It discusses that RTI was recognized as a fundamental right in India in 2005 and enacted to promote transparency and accountability. It outlines key aspects of the act including definitions of information and public authorities, citizens' right to access information, exceptions, procedures for filing RTI requests, and examples of successful uses of RTI like exposing corruption. The document also briefly discusses the history and objectives of the act as well as penalties for non-compliance.
The document contains information about several individuals including their names and contact numbers. It also contains multiple paragraphs discussing the right to information in India, including its historical context, legal basis under the constitution, key court judgements, and provisions under the Right to Information Act 2005. The act aims to promote transparency and accountability in governance. It establishes a regime for citizens to access information held by public authorities within defined timeframes.
This report summarizes the activities of the Office of Information Practices from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014 in administering Hawaii's public records law (UIPA) and open meetings law (Sunshine Law). It provides an overview of the office's budget, personnel, legal guidance provided, education and training efforts, legislation monitored, and litigation supported. The office is responsible for ensuring open access to government records and meetings in order to promote transparency and accountability.
Explore the Power of Transparency: Right to Information (RTI)
Delve into the fundamental right that empowers citizens to access information held by public authorities. This presentation sheds light on the essence of the Right to Information Act, its significance in fostering transparency, and its role in shaping accountable governance.
Discover the ins and outs of RTI, from its historical context to its modern-day implications. Uncover how this pivotal legislation acts as a catalyst for accountability, encouraging citizen engagement and ensuring responsive governance.
Join us on a journey through the nuances of RTI, understanding its applications, impact, and the power it bestows upon citizens to question, seek, and receive information from public bodies.
Empower yourself with knowledge and learn how the Right to Information fosters a more informed and participative society, transforming the landscape of governance for the better."
This ppt includes the basic information related to RTI like its mode of filing by both online and offline and also includes some information related to RTI Amendment Bill 2019.
This document discusses public interest litigation (PIL) in India and the factors responsible for its growth. Some key points:
- PIL allows individuals to file cases on behalf of those unable to access the courts, such as issues around bonded labor, child neglect, exploitation of workers, women's rights, and environmental pollution.
- India's constitution provides a framework for regulating state-citizen and citizen-citizen relations through fundamental rights and directive principles, making it easier for courts to hold the executive accountable.
- The liberal interpretation of locus standi and judicial innovations, like expanding the right to life, have helped the poor and marginalized access justice.
The document discusses the Right to Information Act 2005 and the Official Secrets Act 1923 in India. It provides background on the need for the RTI Act, including promoting transparency and accountability. It outlines important sections of the RTI Act regarding access to information, designation of information officers, appeals process and penalties. It also discusses the Central Information Commission and landmark cases related to RTI. The document then provides history and aspects covered under the Official Secrets Act 1923, including espionage and secret information. It notes tensions between the RTI Act and OSA, as well as committees recommending changes to the latter. Finally, it outlines some cases where the OSA was invoked against journalists.
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses that the Act provides citizens with the legal right to access information from public authorities to promote transparency and accountability. It defines public authority and the types of information that can be accessed. It outlines the procedure for requesting information, associated timelines and fees. It also discusses exemptions and penalties under the Act. The Act aims to empower citizens, reduce corruption and make the government more responsive by promoting openness in its functioning.
This document discusses the Right to Information Act (RTI Act) in India and its role in improving governance. It provides an outline of the key points covered, including the background and objective of the RTI Act, important sections of the act, the roles of stakeholders, how citizens can file RTI applications, examples of RTI activists' work, and two case studies related to the Supreme Court of India. The overall message is that while the RTI Act has helped increase transparency and accountability after seven years of implementation, it still has not been used to its full potential due to issues like lack of awareness, threats faced by activists, and political and bureaucratic resistance to transparency.
The Right to Information Act (RTI) was enacted in 2005 to provide citizens access to information held by public authorities and promote transparency. It allows citizens to request information from any public authority through application in writing or electronically. While most government information can be accessed, there are some exemptions like information related to national security, court proceedings, trade secrets etc. The RTI has been very effective in uncovering corruption, though some activists have faced threats and attacks while using the law.
Right to Information Act 2005 by Dr. N.P.Ghadge.pptxneeta35
The document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It discusses key details about the act including its enactment, provisions, exemptions, compliance mechanisms, and importance in promoting transparency. It also summarizes some notable cases where RTI applications have revealed important information and impacted outcomes. Recent analyses of information commissions' performance indicate huge backlogs, lack of hearings during the pandemic, and average waiting times of over a year to resolve cases in some states. Strengthening implementation and increasing awareness of the law are recommended.
Right to information act, 2005 | Aadhit B BalajiAadhit B
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act passed in India in 2005. It discusses how the Act ushered in a new era of participatory democracy by granting citizens the right to access information held by public authorities. Prior to the Act, most information was considered secret under colonial era laws. The document traces the constitutional basis for the right to information and key court cases that established it as a fundamental right. It also discusses the role of social movements like MKSS in demanding greater transparency that led various states to pass their own right to information laws, which informed the national act.
The Right to Information Act 2005 establishes a regime of transparency in India that overrides the Official Secrets Act. It gives Indian citizens the right to access information held by public authorities. The Act defines 'information' broadly and places obligations on public authorities to proactively disclose information. It also establishes procedures for citizens to request information, appeal rejections of requests, and penalties for non-compliance. The Act aims to promote transparency and contain corruption in governance.
RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT 2005 right to informationhlo951790
The document summarizes the Right to Information Act 2005 in India. It was enacted by Parliament to provide citizens access to information from public authorities in order to promote transparency and accountability. Under the Act, citizens can request information and public authorities must provide responses within 30 days. The Act also established Central and State Information Commissions to oversee its implementation and hear appeals.
This document provides an overview of the Right to Information Act in India. It begins with presenting the act and providing its objectives which are to promote transparency and accountability in public authorities. It then discusses the background leading to the passage of the act. The key aspects covered include the steps to file an RTI request, important definitions in the act like public authority and information, responsibilities of public authorities and public information officers, and grounds for rejection of information requests. In summary, the document outlines the Right to Information Act of India and its provisions to provide citizens access to information from public authorities.
Comparative Analysis of 2014 Election Manifestos of INC, BJP & AAPSaif Khan
The document provides a comparative analysis of the 2014 election manifestos of the Indian National Congress (INC), Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) across 10 policy areas: corruption, participative democracy, economic growth, foreign policy, defense and security, judicial reforms, education, health, secularism and communal harmony, and welfare initiatives. It finds that while the BJP manifesto addresses the most issues, the AAP manifesto scores highest on human rights and promises more for minorities than the INC. The analysis aims to provide voters with an intensive scrutiny of the parties' policy proposals to help inform their electoral decisions.
The document discusses using generative AI to simplify workflows in museums. It describes using chatbots and language models to generate keywords, convert file formats, create websites, and translate between natural language and structured queries. The document also discusses generating synthetic text descriptions from metadata and using chatbots to have unstructured conversations about museum collections.
This document summarizes a workshop on accessing EU funding opportunities. It introduces the RL:EU project which aims to help libraries learn about and access EU initiatives and programs. The workshop covers the Erasmus+ and Creative Europe programs. Erasmus+ supports education, training and youth projects through cooperation-based projects like KA210 and KA220. Creative Europe funds culture and audiovisual projects through its Culture, Media, and Cross-sectoral strands. Examples of funded library projects are provided.
28. More than 70 countries have enacted RTI Act; but only a fewer have also revised or modernized their RM legislations. Thus in many countries acts or rules related to RM are mostly out dated.
39. On 14 th July 2010, Chief Information Commissioner pointed out that record keeping is very poor in Bangladesh and there is an urgent need for keeping records digitally.