Downloaded 21 times
Uploaded byDefence and Security Accelerator
24 June 2015: Creating effective CDE proposals
The document provides guidance for completing research proposals for the Centre for Defence Enterprise, focusing on key factors such as clarity, innovation, and technical readiness. It emphasizes the importance of a strong approach, performance assessment, and clear deliverables while outlining submission requirements and the need for evidence of feasibility and impact. Additionally, it highlights the critical need for proposals to demonstrate military relevance and alignment with future capabilities.
More Related Content
Similar to 24 June 2015: Creating effective CDE proposals
More from Defence and Security Accelerator
24 June 2015: Creating effective CDE proposals
- 1.
- 2. 25 June 2015 Guidancefor completing CDE research proposals Bruce Hardie - CDE Technology Manager
- 3. Proposal content Proposal format Exemplars 25June 2015 © Crown copyright 2013 Dstl Your feedback
- 4. What are welooking for? 5 key factors
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11. The benefit Valued benefit(s) Significantlevels Commitment
- 12. The benefit Critical scienceand technology Wider applications MOD as a business
- 13. The benefit Critical scienceand technology Wider applications MOD as a business
- 14.
- 15. The impact Game changing? Pushboundaries? Barriers
- 16.
- 17. The impact Benefits Body ofevidence Roadmap
- 18. The impact Benefits Body ofevidence Roadmap
- 19. The approach Strong outputs Cleardescriptions Logical/progressive
- 20.
- 21. The approach Access tofacilities Government- furnished ‘X’ (GFX) Assumptions
- 22.
- 23. The deliverables Clear offerings Differences– rivals Performance
- 24.
- 25. CDE assessment Online links PAFguide All competitions
- 26.
- 27.
- 28. Likelihood of exploitation Makeit happen Delivery
- 29. Building critical S&Tfor UK Future capabilities Future visions
- 30.
- 31. Technical risk Assess feasibility De-riskdecisions Push S&T limits
- 32.
- 33. Online bid submission Portal– only route Low overheads Control of intellectual property (IP)
- 34.
- 35. Technical tabs -advice Options Use carefully.. (ANY) option
- 36. Proposal - frontcover Title Innovation description Careful thought
- 37. Military scenario Where used? Multipleuses? Constraints
- 38. Military organisation Land –sea – air? Type of role activities
- 39. Military capability Do weneed it? Performance How measured?
- 40.
- 41.
- 42.
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
- 46.
- 47.
- 48. Intellectual capital Ownership ofIP Level of maturity Approach
- 49.
- 50. Contract scenario Planned activities Futurevision Attachments!
- 51. Supply organisation Who's involved? Alliances Don’trely on GFX..
- 52.
- 53. Resource scheduling Known FY“bug” Be specific! Overheads
- 54. Contracting terms Contract type Justifychoice Reasonable profit
- 55.
- 56. Payment schedules Advanced funding Stagepayments Contract set up
- 57. Final reminders! The 5key factors! Clear & concise! Use (ANY) option
- 58.
- 59. Final reminders! Avoid GFX Earlysubmissions! Contract set up
- 60. Proposal health check Proofread Remove ambiguity Weed out TLAs!
- 61.
- 62. Questions? Centre for DefenceEnterprise cde@dstl.gov.uk www.gov.uk/dstl/cde