Enhancing Worker Digital Experience: A Hands-on Workshop for Partners
2.1 Le Blanc
1. ISBM, Manchester UK, 9th ‐ 11th September 2013
HOW CONFIDENT ARE WE?
Alain LeBlanc
Special projects’ manager,
support services and external quality assessment
Centre de toxicologie du Québec (CTQ)
INSPQ, Québec, Canada
Pierre Dumas
Research & Development division
3. QUEBEC MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND WEALTHFARE (MSSS)
INSTITUT NATIONAL DE SANTÉ PUBLIQUE DU QUÉBEC (INSPQ)
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND TOXICOLOGY DEPT. (DSET)
CENTRE DE TOXICOLOGIE DU QUÉBEC (CTQ)
Claude Thellen
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Sergine Lapointe
TOXICOLOGY
LABORATORY BRANCH
Normand Fleury
SPECIAL PROJECTS, SUPPORT
SERVICES and EQAS SECTOR
Alain LeBlanc
RESEARCH
Pierre Ayotte
METHOD
DEVELOPMENT
Patrick Bélanger
CLINICAL
ORGANICS
Michel Lefebvre
Eric Gaudreau
METALS
Ciprian‐Mihai
Cirtiu
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
and SUPPORT
SERVICES
EXTERNAL
QUALITY
ASSESSMENT
SCHEMES
5. •
•
•
•
•
To develop reliable, robust and accurate analytical methods
To assure tracability of the metrology
To assure tracability of the data
To assure the comparability of the analytical results
To develop and maintain competence of staff
6. Sample collection, integrity and storage
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Time of collection (spot/24 hrs; day‐to‐day variability)
Handling (freeze/thaw)
Stability (+ > 5 yrs)
Homogeneity: free/conjugated species
Contamination (collection process, container, …)
Sampling container (adsorption onto plastics) / Tubes
Are we sure we are measuring the right biomarker? in the right matrix?
Shipping considerations (overnight, deep freeze)
Analytical innovation
•
•
Keep costs down; compromise with multi‐analyte methods
Tend to less invasive matrices, but are they the right ones?
7. Analytical standards
•
•
Availability of conjugated analytes
Accuracy (certificates, multiple sources)
Impact on biomonitoring data (cycle to cycle)
Availability of appropriate internal standards
13C labeled and unlabeled analogs are usually not available at the same time
• Custom synthesis (TRC, CANSYN, CHIRON, CIL, etc)
High cost, time to delivery, lot‐to‐lot, purity (UV, NMR, IR and MS spectra)
•
•
Analytical methods
•
•
•
•
Classical versus experimental protocols
Sensitivity (LODs) and specificity
Reportable limits (no international consensus; study comparisons)
Laboratory contamination (ex: BPA, Triclosan, Parabens, BDEs, …)
8. Analytical instrumentation
•
Comparability
Reference materials
•
•
•
Availability (certified?)
Appropriateness (same matrix?) commutability
Internal RM 2nd source of standard!!
External quality assessment schemes
•
How to compare study results?
•
•
Collaboration among reference labs or research centers
To help reduce vulnerability
35. • 3 continuing programs in blood, urine, serum and hair
Metals: PCI, QMEQAS POPs: AMAP
• Material from human origin; unexposed volunteers
• 2 developing programs: MDA, Organic compounds in urine
• Voluntary participation
• Funded by the participants
• Reference material virtual store
37. • Laboratories involved in HBM face challenges at all levels of operation
• Competence of staff must be developped and maintained
• Method validation must be brought to a higher level
(stability, matrix effect, comparability of standards, …)
• Importance of External quality assessment schemes and reference
materials is obvious
adapted QA strategy (work to do)
• A laboratory facility with a scientific and administratrive infrastructure is
mandatory
• The term « new contaminant » alone shouldn’t set the rationale for
biomonitoring
• A reference laboratory must have the capabilities and experience to
tackle these recurring issues (not necessarily compatible with every
laboratory structure)