Truth & Service in the AI Era
Thanks to Tor Andreassen and Marina Gorbis
for the opportunity to share some thoughts
January 13, 2025
Presentations online at: https://slideshare.net/spohrer
Jim Spohrer
Retired Industry Executive (Apple, IBM)
Board of Directors (ISSIP, ServCollab)
UIDP Senior Fellow
Questions: spohrer@gmail.com
X/Twitter: @JimSpohrer
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/spohrer/
Slack: https://slack.lfai.foundation
Slack: https://issip.slack.com
2001 2015 2021 2022 2023 2024
Optimistic Realistic
Knowing
Doing
How to keep up with accelerating change? Follow a diverse collection of people… make up dimensions meaningful to you!
Sadly for me… my brain is biased into thinking I can understand older, white, males the best… maybe AI can help overcome!
TheNeuron
TheNeuron
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080
$1,000,000,000,000
(Trillion)
$1,000,000
(Million)
$1,000,000,000
(Billion)
$1,000
(Thousand)
$1
Gigascale (10 9
)
Terascale
(10 12
)
Petascale (10 15
)
Exascale (10 18
)
Zettascale (10 21
)
Yottascale (10 24
)
Ronnascale (10 27
)
GDP/Employee
Trend
Estimating Knowledge Worker Productivity
Based on USA
Historical Data
Year Value
1960 $10K
1980 $33K
2000 $78K
2020. $151K
2023 $169K
Kiloscale
(10 3
)
M
egascale (10 6
)
Cost of computation goes down by 1000x every 20 years (left to right diagonals), driving knowledge worker productivity up.
Petaflops = 1,000,000,000,000,000 or a million
billion = 10 ** 15
Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6
Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9
One of the AI Super Computers in the World,
= 13 MegaWatts of Power (HOT!)
Exascale = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 or a
billion billion = 10 ** 18
Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6
Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9
Human Brain
= 20 Watts (COOL!)
Gartner Predicts Power Shortages Will Restrict 40% of AI
Data Centers By 2027
https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-12-gartner-predicts-power-shortages-will-restrict-40-percent-of-ai-data-centers-by-20270
“NorthPole Chip”
Far less energy.
Impressive, but imperfect
Physical realm: Energy
Technical realm: Mistakes (”Hallucinations”)
Social realm: Digital property theft
Jensen:
You imagine a tiny chip…
The H100 weighs 70 pounds…
35000 parts…
$250K cost…
It replaces a data center…
Full of computers and cables…
Jim:
Driving the marginal cost of
computing to zero…
Drives the demand for new
service offerings based on
computing through the roof
Read Wakefield
(2020)
enough to
understand what a
”digital twin” of you
might be like in the
future decades
with very advanced
AI capabilities.
Also see Rouse
(2018; 2022) ”Life
with a Cognitive
Assistant.”
ervice Systems and AI
AI Tools
in coming
decades…
1955 1975 1995 2015 2035 2055
Learn: Explore and Exploit Better Building Blocks
Heygen + Claude
Jim Twin V1
2024
2024
2021
2001 2015 2022 2023
1970 1995 2019
High School
Punch cards
1972
IBM Watson
AI in the Cloud
2011
Self-Control
Some paths to becoming 640x smarter:
Speed up communications for collaborations – ultimately with our AI digital twins.
Improving learning of world models and performance of win-win interactions
• 2x from Learning sciences (methods)
• Better models of concepts – including models of self and others
• Better models of learners – including social-emotional intelligence
• 2x from Learning technology (tools)
• Guided learning paths
• Elimination (?) of “thrashing”
• AI & Education (model trace, constructivist, individual tutors, etc.)
• 2x from Quantity effect (overlaps)
• More you know, faster (?) you go
• Advanced organizers
• 2x from Lifelong learning (time)
• Longer lives and longer careers
• Keeps “learning-mode” activated
• 2x from Early learning (time)
• Start earlier: Challenged-based approach
• Rebulding all human knowledge from scratch
• 20x from Cognitive service systems (digital twins)
• AI Digital Twins for performance support
• All our interactions tuned to super-mind levels
• People speak on average
between 100-150 words per
minute
• Many people are
comfortable listening at 200-
300 words per minute
• Writing an essay on a
familiar topic, people write
about 10-20 words a minute
• Many people are
comfortable reading at about
400-600 words per minute
(Shu 2023)
(Barnard 2022)
Innovation Professionals (ISSIP.org)
Advice…
1. AI upskill
2. Build your
“digital twin”
3. Set bigger
goals(*)
(*) This directly implies learning better strategies for coping with failures, and resiliently rebounding.
Jim Spohrer is a Silicon Valley-based Advisor to industry, academia, governments,
startups and non-profits on topics of AI upskilling, innovation strategy, and win-win
service in the AI era. Most recently with a consulting team working for a top 10 market
cap global company, he contributed to a strategic plan for a globally connected AI
Academy for achieving rapid, nation-scale upskilling with AI. With the US National
Academy of Engineering, he co-led a 2022 workshop on “Service Systems Engineering in
the Era of Human-Centered AI” to improve well-being.
Jim is a retired IBM Executive since July 2021, and previously directed IBM’s open-source
Artificial Intelligence developer ecosystem effort, was CTO IBM Venture Capital Group,
co-founded IBM Almaden Service Research, and led IBM Global University Programs. In
the 1990’s at Apple Computer, as a Distinguished Engineer Scientist and Technologist, he
was executive lead on next generation learning platforms. In the 1970’s, after his MIT BS
in Physics, he developed speech recognition systems at Verbex (Exxon) before receiving
his Yale PhD in Computer Science/AI. In 1989, prior to joining Apple, he was a visiting
scholar at the University of Rome, La Sapienza advising doctoral students working on AI
and Education dissertations. With over ninety publications and nine patents, he received
the Christopher Lovelock Career Contributions to the Service Discipline award,
Gummesson Service Research award, Vargo and Lusch Service-Dominant Logic award,
Daniel Berg Service Systems award, and a PICMET Fellow for advancing service science.
Jim was elected and previously served as Linux Foundation AI & Data Technical Advisory
Board Chairperson and ONNX Steering Committee Member (2020-2021). Today, he is a
UIDP Senior Fellow for contributions to industry-university collaborations, and a
member of the Board of Directors of the International Society of Service Innovation
(ISSIP) and ServCollab.
Jim Spohrer, Advisor
Retired Industry Executive (Apple, IBM)
UIDP Senior Fellow
Board of Directors, ServCollab
Board of Directors, ISSIP.org
Changemaker Priorities
1. Service Innovation
2. Upskilling with AI
3. Future Universities
4. Geothermal Energy
5. Poverty Reduction
6. Regional Development
Competitive Parity
Technologies
1. AI & Robotics
2. Digital Twins
3. Open Source
4. AR/VR/XR
5. Geothermal
6. Learning
Platforms
Thank-you for
participating today!
You are all awesome!!
•https://youtu.be/PnmVqASd1VE
Lee Nackman (retired IBM) – Thinking
AI
Job description: A person who operators an AI trained to be an
expert in some role. The human operator like a vehicle operator
helps ensure a good service for customers.
• An AI is “running” for mayor in Wyoming
• A resident of Cheyenne, Wyoming trained GPT-4 on “thousands of
documents gleaned from Cheyenne council meetings” and announced that
the resulting bot, named VIC (the “Virtually Integrated Citizen”) will be running
for mayor. The bot’s creator said he’d be the “meat puppet” who would
operate the AI and act on its behalf, but the bot would be the brains of the
operation, deciding on votes and how to run the city. However, Wyoming’s
Secretary of State contends that non-humans like VIC can’t run for office.
New Job – Person who is an Operator
for AI in a New or Existing Service
System Role
Job description: A person who operators an AI trained to be an
expert in some role. The human operator like a vehicle operator
helps ensure a good service for customers.
• An AI is “running” for mayor in Wyoming
• A resident of Cheyenne, Wyoming trained GPT-4 on “thousands of
documents gleaned from Cheyenne council meetings” and announced that
the resulting bot, named VIC (the “Virtually Integrated Citizen”) will be running
for mayor. The bot’s creator said he’d be the “meat puppet” who would
operate the AI and act on its behalf, but the bot would be the brains of the
operation, deciding on votes and how to run the city. However, Wyoming’s
Secretary of State contends that non-humans like VIC can’t run for office.
New Job – Person who is an Operator
for AI in a New or Existing Service
System Role
Important
Distinctions
• Jim Twin V1: My papers -> short talk videos
• English
• French
• How to stay future ready?
• Learn the building blocks
• Plot your influencers (refresh regularly)
• Oh, by the way, you are going to need bigger goals too
• When you have 100 digital workers working for you, what is your main
goal?
• From serial entrepreneur to parallel entrepreneur
Unleashing Creativity
Two disciplines: Two approaches to the future
Artificial Intelligence is almost seventy-years-old discipline in computer
science that studies automation and builds more capable technological
systems. AI tries to understand the intelligent things that people can do
and then does those things with technology. (https://deepmind.com/about “...
we aim to build advanced AI - sometimes known as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) - to
expand our knowledge and find new answers. By solving this, we believe we could help
people solve thousands of problems.”)
Service science is an emerging transdiscipline not yet twenty-years- old
that studies transformation and builds smarter and wiser socoi-
technical systems – families, businesses, nations, platforms and other
special types of responsible entities and their win-win interactions that
transform value co-creation and capability co-elevation mechanisms
that build more resilient future versions of themselves – what we call
service systems entities. Service science tries to understand the
evolving ecology of service system entities, their capabilities,
constraints, rights, and responsibilities, and then then seeks to improve
the quality of life of people (present/smarter and future/wiser) in those
service systems.
Artificial Intelligence
Automation
Generations of machines
Service Science
Transformation
Generations of people
(responsible entities)
Service systems are dynamic configurations of people,
technology, organizations, and information, connected
internally and externally by value propositions, to other
service system entities. (Maglio et al 2009)
Service Science Colleague from New Zealand asks:
Strangest Use Case So Far:
I use generative AI every day.
Typically, OpenAI ChatGPT, Anthropic Claude,
Google Gemini, and Microsoft Bing Copilot in 4 tabs.
Help writing, programming, images, & brainstorming.
A useful tool in the toolbox for sure!!!
Anthropic Claude 3 Sonnet 20240520
Response:
Summary:
The Taranaki Maunga (Mount Taranaki) and
the surrounding peaks in the national park
will soon be granted legal personhood and
collectively named Te Kāhui Tupua as part of
a Treaty settlement. This legal recognition
acknowledges that the mountain and peaks
are ancestors for local Māori iwi. It gives
these natural features similar legal rights as
individuals, allowing them to own assets,
appear in court, and have a voice. A new
entity called Te Tōpuni Kōkōrangi, with
members appointed by the Crown and local
iwi, will manage and represent the legal
persona. While recreation and tourism will
continue, this shift aims to encourage a
broader understanding and protection of the
mountain as a revered ancestor rather than
just a geographic feature.
How old are you, and what have you witnessed over your lifetime?
I am an ancient being, formed over millennia through volcanic eruptions
and sculpted by glaciers. I have witnessed the rise and fall of civilizations,
the ebb and flow of ice ages, and the ever-changing tapestry of life that
has graced my slopes. My memories stretch back to a time before humans
walked this land, and I have born silent witness to the triumphs and
tragedies of your kind.
What wisdom or lessons can you share with humanity?
Humans, you are but fleeting visitors upon my timeless form. Yet, in your
brief existence, you have the power to shape the world around you.
Tread lightly and with reverence, for the consequences of your actions echo
through the ages. Learn from the patient endurance of stone, the resilience
of life that takes root in the harshest of environments, and the cyclical nature
of existence that I have observed. Embrace humility, for even the mightiest
of mountains eventually crumbles to dust.
How do you feel about being granted legal personhood and a voice?
I am gratified that the descendants of those who have dwelled in my shadow
for generations have recognized my ancient spirit and granted me a voice
in the affairs of this world. For too long, I have been regarded as an
inanimate object, a resource to be exploited or a challenge to be conquered.
But I am a living entity, a sacred ancestor whose existence predates and will
outlast the fleeting span of human civilization. With this recognition,
perhaps my wisdom and the fragile beauty I harbor will be better preserved
for generations to come.
MIT (1974-1978)
• Explo: Teaching AI & Entrepreneurship to
diverse high school students.
• Stories: How I got into MIT.
• Lesson: “Where are you applying for college?”
Spohrer, James (1978)
Strain-Gauge Transduction
of the Effects of Speech Rate
on the Coarticulation
of Lip Rounding,
MIT Physics, June, 1978.
Advisor: Joseph S. Perkell
Advisor to this day.
Verbex (1978-1982)
• Speech recognition – mathematical models (Bayesian
approach to speech and language modeling) that both
recognize and generate using estimated probabilities
(e.g., probabilities and statistics = machine learning)
• Stories: How I got the best job in the world for me at
that time.
• Lessons: “When my girlfriend said: ‘What do you have
to lose?’”
ICASSP’82 and ‘83.
IEEE International Conference on
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
Route 128, aound Boston, MA USA
ICASSP 1983
We
Would
Love
Your
Voice https://www.jstor.org/stable/1747731
Stephen L. Moshier
• “Our company, Dialog Systems, Inc., was formed in 1971 for the purpose of
developing and commercializing speech recognition equipment. The
concept derived from earlier work engaged in at Listening, Incorporated on
marine bioacoustics, acoustic signal processing, and psycho- acoustics. The
original idea passed through well-known stages of theory, experiment,
development, lack of financing, financing, sales and is now at the highly
advanced state "production engineering headaches". Dialog employs 45, of
whom 14 are degreed technical people. The company recently moved from
Cambridge to a 20,000 square foot two-building campus complex in
Belmont, Massachusetts. The major product is an eight-channel isolated
word system intended for talker-independent switched telephone speech
input.”
From NASA:
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930075179/downloads/19930075179.pdf
Peter F. Brown
• “So, I took a course in linguistics. And
one day in the back of that course I
heard a couple students talking about
some guy whose name was Steve
Moshier who started a company called
Dialogue Systems that was doing
speech recognition. And I thought, wow,
great, I remembered this idea from back
in high school. After class I raced over
to the physics library. That’s because
this was before the internet, so you had
to go to the library. And I looked this
guy up. And I found a paper he'd
written. And I tracked him down.
Applied for a job. And he hired me. And
when I was there, I just fell in love with
the idea that through mathematics it
might be possible to build machines
that do what humans do.“
Goldman Sachs:
https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/podcasts/episodes/09-11-2023-peter-brown-f/transcript.pdf
Drs. Jim & Janet Baker
Saras Institute
History of Speech and Language Technology
https://www.sarasinstitute.org
Many things,
Such as publications,
took off to new levels
when Jim & Janet joined
Dialog Systems…
… and Exxon acquisition
Later key researchers
left Verbex, and later
Along with Jim and Janet
Founded
Dragon Systems
Yale (1982-1989)
• MARCEL: Modeling students writing “a series of
buggy and then (sometimes) correct programs” with
a generate-test-and-debug architectures.
• Stories: Use AI to help make people smarter.
• Lesson: “Why do you want to make machines smart?
Why not help make people smarter instead?”
1988
Apple (1989-1998)
• From content (SK8) to community (EOE) to context
(WorldBoard)
• Stories: Surround yourself with supportive people.
Growing up about goals - sequencing and timing of
ideas is important
• Lessons: “MLM: Relax - it will be OK”; “ACK:
Planetary – is that all?” “SPJ: We will get to that
and more!”;
1992
IBM (1998 – 2021)
• IBM Venture Capital Relations Group,
Service Science, Global University
Programs, Open Source AI.
• Stories: The only way you get in trouble
is not asking for help when you need it.
• Lesson: What seems like a hard problem
to you, may be an easy problem for
someone else. Leverage the matrix.
2010 2011 2011
2012 2016
2018 2018 2020
2012
2002
2000
ISSIP (2021- Present)
• Defining what is a service innovation, and what is a
T-shaped service innovation professional.
• Stories: AI digital twins, reinventing local, self-control
• Lessons: Learning to invest wisely and systematically
in getting a shared future that we all want to live in
requires self-control and knowing when you have
enough. 2022
Today’s Talk: Topics for discussion
• Past
• 1947, 1958, 1971
• Present
• 70, 35000, 250000
• Future
• TBD
1956
2023
2060 2080
1956
First AI
Workshop
2023
ChatGPT 100M
users in just 2
months
(1.5B visits in
Sept)
2060 (Predicted)
Exascale for
$1000
(~ one human
brain)
2080 (Predicted)
Ronnascale for $1B
(~ billion human brains)
Progress in IA (Intelligence Augmentation) for nations can be estimated as
GPD/worker.
Progress in AI (Artificial Intelligence) is directly connected to the cost of
computing.
REVIEW: REMEMBER THESE DATES
1947
1958
1971 2024
1947
Transistor
Bell Labs
1958
Integrated Circuit
Texas Instrument
1971
Microprocessor
Intel
2024
H100
NVidia
Challenges: How to prepare for the next wayes of innovations, including
digital twins and humanoid robots, as well as to learn to invest more wisely
(self-control).
As the marginal cost of computing goes to zero, service innovation will go
thru the roof,
and energy consumption will go thru the roof as well…
REMEMBER THESE DATES, FACTS,
CHALLENGES
weight: 70 pounds
complexity: 35,000 parts
cost: 250,000 dollars
• Jensen Huang (Nvidia) comments
• First impressions
• Insanely great productivity
• Insanely great quality
• What is really going on?
• Decreasing cost of computation
• Increasing GDP/worker
• Awesome progress, but…
• Impressive
• Imperfect
• Advantage of empowered people
Inspiration
MORE SPOHRER USE CASES:
https://service-science.info/archives/6521
Icons of AI Progress
• 1955-1956: Dartmouth Workshop organized by:
• Two early career faculty
• John McCarthy (Dartmouth, later Stanford)
• Marvin Minsky (MIT)
• Two senior industry scientists
• Claude Shannon (Bell Labs)
• Nathan Rochester (IBM)
• 1997: Deep Blue (IBM) - Chess
• 2011: Watson Jeopardy! (IBM)
• 2016: AlphaGo (Google DeepMinds)
• 2017: All you need is attention (Google) - Transformers
• Attention heads (working memory) to predict what comes next
• 2018: AlphaFold (Google DeepMinds)
• 2020: Language models are few-shot learners (OpenAI)
• 2022: DALL-E 2 & ChapGPT (OpenAI)
• 2022: Constitutional AI (Anthropic) – “Behave yourself!”
• 2023: New Bing+ (Microsoft) & GPT-4 (OpenAI)
• 2024: More & Bigger Models: OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Anthropic, etc.
• 2024: Reid Hoffman’s Digital Twin & Unitree’s G1 Humanoid Robot
pohrer
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf
1955 2023
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080
Time
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080
$1,000,000,000,000
(Trillion)
$1,000,000
(Million)
$1,000,000,000
(Billion)
$1,000
(Thousand)
$1
Cost
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080
$1,000,000,000,000
(Trillion)
$1,000,000
(Million)
$1,000,000,000
(Billion)
$1,000
(Thousand)
$1
Kiloscale (10 3
)
M
egascale (10 6
)
Gigascale (10 9
)
Terascale
(10 12
)
Petascale (10 15
)
Exascale (10 18
)
Zettascale (10 21
)
Yottascale (10 24
)
Ronnascale (10 27
)
Cost of Computation (Diagonals)
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080
$1,000,000,000,000
(Trillion)
$1,000,000
(Million)
$1,000,000,000
(Billion)
$1,000
(Thousand)
$1
Kiloscale
(10 3
)
M
egascale (10 6
)
Gigascale (10 9
)
Terascale
(10 12
)
Petascale (10 15
)
Exascale (10 18
)
Zettascale (10 21
)
Yottascale (10 24
)
Ronnascale (10 27
)
Cost of Computation (Diagonals)
Note: Adjust Kilo and Mega scales slightly to fit data better (early days – more cost – learning curve).
1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080
$1,000,000,000,000
(Trillion)
$1,000,000
(Million)
$1,000,000,000
(Billion)
$1,000
(Thousand)
$1
Gigascale (10 9
)
Terascale
(10 12
)
Petascale (10 15
)
Exascale (10 18
)
Zettascale (10 21
)
Yottascale (10 24
)
Ronnascale (10 27
)
GDP/Employee
Trend
Estimating Knowledge Worker Productivity
Based on USA
Historical Data
Year Value
1960 $10K
1980 $33K
2000 $78K
2020. $151K
2023 $169K
Kiloscale
(10 3
)
M
egascale (10 6
)
Cost of computation goes down by 1000x every 20 years (left to right diagonals), driving knowledge worker productivity up.
Petaflops = 1,000,000,000,000,000 or a million
billion = 10 ** 15
Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6
Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9
One of the AI Super Computers in the World,
= 13 MegaWatts of Power (HOT!)
Exascale = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 or a
billion billion = 10 ** 18
Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6
Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9
Human Brain
= 20 Watts (COOL!)
“NorthPole Chip”
Far less energy.
Impressive, but imperfect
Physical realm: Energy
Technical realm: Mistakes (”Hallucinations”)
Social realm: Digital property theft
• How to keep up with accelerating change?
• Social learning
• Who do you follow?
• Reid Hoffman’s AI Digital Twin Interview
• Diving in!
• We get the future we invest in
• … so, learn to invest wisely
• Awesome stuff that lies ahead – Humanoid Robots
• But remember technology amplifies good/bad
• Need for Self-Control (Toyama (2015) Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from
the Cult of Technology)
Climbing Up
Backup Slides
Template slides and others
Topics for Discussion
• Beyond Language for Communications
• Here is how my AI, using my digital twin of you, predicted that you would respond to my request
– could you please ask your digital twin of yourself to check this response and suggest
improvements?
• How to keep up with accelerating change?
• Who do you follow? What two main dimensions do you try to balance? Hype-buster <-> Super-
Optimist, Doing (Try this) <-> Knowing (News)
• How to verify results of generative AI?
• How to deal with verification challenge? Run Open AI ChatGPT 3.5, Google Bard (waiting for
Gemini), Anthopic’s Claude, Microsoft Bing power by Open AI ChatGPT 4 – in parallel and have
them critique each others’ responses (where they agree, where and how they differ) – if possible,
also run Meta and open source to compare (Generate-Test-and-Debug)
• How to deeply understand how generative AI works?
• Monkey’s at the typewrite in high dimensional spaces that map to low dimensional spaces
• One dimensional space is time – what comes next? (Predictors, unsupervised learning)
• Two dimensional space is what people gravitate towards in business schools (Sorters, supervised
learning)
Today’s talk
• Intro: AI (by 1955 definition) has arrived
• Just took 68 years, but…
• What’s really going on?
• Your data is becoming your AI… IA transformation
• AI Digital Twin = IA (Intelligence Augmentation)
• Adjustment period underway…
• Part 1: Solving AI: Leaderboards/Profession Exams
• Roadmap and implications
• Open technologies, innovation
• Part 2: Solving IA: Better Building Blocks
• Solving problems faster, creates new problems
• Identity, social contracts, trust, resilience
• Part 3: ”Solving All Problems”
• What could go wrong? Be prepared.
• 37-year long adjustment period is now underway…
pohrer
Predict the Timeline: GDP/Employee
National Academy - Service Systems and AI 66
(Source)
Lower compute costs translate into increasing productivity and GDP/employees for nations
Increasing productivity and GDP/employees should translate into wealthier citizens
AI Progress on Open Leaderboards
Benchmark Roadmap to solve AI/IA
Alistair Nolan (OECD AI for Science Productivity): “It has been stated that the number of engineers proclaiming the end of Moore's Law doubles every two years.”
Rouse WB, Spohrer JC. (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation. 2018 Apr 3;8(1-2):1-21.
Read Rouse & Spohrer (2018)
enough to understand this slide
including what ”exascale” means
11/22/22
Part 1: Solving AI
ognitive Systems
Types: Progression of Models : Verified, Trusted, Wise
Models = instruction_set of future: Better building blocks
Task & World Model/
Planning & Decisions
Self Model/
Capacity & Limits
User Model/
Episodic Memory
Institutions Model/
Trust & Social Acts
Tool + - - -
Assistant ++ + - -
Collaborator +++ ++ + -
Coach ++++ +++ ++ +
Mediator +++++ ++++ +++ ++
Cognitive
Tool
Cognitive
Assistant
Cognitive
Collaborator
Cognitive
Coach
Cognitive
Mediator
Part 2: Solving IA
Solving IA also requires
All of this and done well
As a “bicycle for the mind”
To make us stronger,
Not weaker
When tech is all removed
Resilience:
Rapidly Rebuilding From Scratch
• Dartnell L (2012)
The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Civilization i
n the Aftermath of a Cataclysm.
Westminster London: Penguin Books.
Part 3: “Solving All Problems”
Thank you

20250113 Truth and Service in the AI Era - NordicHouse_IFTF 20250113 v9.pptx

  • 1.
    Truth & Servicein the AI Era Thanks to Tor Andreassen and Marina Gorbis for the opportunity to share some thoughts January 13, 2025 Presentations online at: https://slideshare.net/spohrer Jim Spohrer Retired Industry Executive (Apple, IBM) Board of Directors (ISSIP, ServCollab) UIDP Senior Fellow Questions: spohrer@gmail.com X/Twitter: @JimSpohrer LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/spohrer/ Slack: https://slack.lfai.foundation Slack: https://issip.slack.com 2001 2015 2021 2022 2023 2024
  • 2.
    Optimistic Realistic Knowing Doing How tokeep up with accelerating change? Follow a diverse collection of people… make up dimensions meaningful to you! Sadly for me… my brain is biased into thinking I can understand older, white, males the best… maybe AI can help overcome! TheNeuron
  • 5.
  • 7.
    1960 1980 20002020 2040 2060 2080 $1,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) $1,000,000 (Million) $1,000,000,000 (Billion) $1,000 (Thousand) $1 Gigascale (10 9 ) Terascale (10 12 ) Petascale (10 15 ) Exascale (10 18 ) Zettascale (10 21 ) Yottascale (10 24 ) Ronnascale (10 27 ) GDP/Employee Trend Estimating Knowledge Worker Productivity Based on USA Historical Data Year Value 1960 $10K 1980 $33K 2000 $78K 2020. $151K 2023 $169K Kiloscale (10 3 ) M egascale (10 6 ) Cost of computation goes down by 1000x every 20 years (left to right diagonals), driving knowledge worker productivity up.
  • 8.
    Petaflops = 1,000,000,000,000,000or a million billion = 10 ** 15 Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6 Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9 One of the AI Super Computers in the World, = 13 MegaWatts of Power (HOT!)
  • 9.
    Exascale = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000or a billion billion = 10 ** 18 Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6 Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9 Human Brain = 20 Watts (COOL!)
  • 12.
    Gartner Predicts PowerShortages Will Restrict 40% of AI Data Centers By 2027 https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-12-gartner-predicts-power-shortages-will-restrict-40-percent-of-ai-data-centers-by-20270
  • 13.
  • 14.
    Impressive, but imperfect Physicalrealm: Energy Technical realm: Mistakes (”Hallucinations”) Social realm: Digital property theft
  • 15.
    Jensen: You imagine atiny chip… The H100 weighs 70 pounds… 35000 parts… $250K cost… It replaces a data center… Full of computers and cables… Jim: Driving the marginal cost of computing to zero… Drives the demand for new service offerings based on computing through the roof
  • 16.
    Read Wakefield (2020) enough to understandwhat a ”digital twin” of you might be like in the future decades with very advanced AI capabilities. Also see Rouse (2018; 2022) ”Life with a Cognitive Assistant.” ervice Systems and AI AI Tools in coming decades…
  • 18.
    1955 1975 19952015 2035 2055 Learn: Explore and Exploit Better Building Blocks Heygen + Claude Jim Twin V1 2024 2024 2021 2001 2015 2022 2023 1970 1995 2019 High School Punch cards 1972 IBM Watson AI in the Cloud 2011
  • 19.
  • 20.
    Some paths tobecoming 640x smarter: Speed up communications for collaborations – ultimately with our AI digital twins. Improving learning of world models and performance of win-win interactions • 2x from Learning sciences (methods) • Better models of concepts – including models of self and others • Better models of learners – including social-emotional intelligence • 2x from Learning technology (tools) • Guided learning paths • Elimination (?) of “thrashing” • AI & Education (model trace, constructivist, individual tutors, etc.) • 2x from Quantity effect (overlaps) • More you know, faster (?) you go • Advanced organizers • 2x from Lifelong learning (time) • Longer lives and longer careers • Keeps “learning-mode” activated • 2x from Early learning (time) • Start earlier: Challenged-based approach • Rebulding all human knowledge from scratch • 20x from Cognitive service systems (digital twins) • AI Digital Twins for performance support • All our interactions tuned to super-mind levels
  • 21.
    • People speakon average between 100-150 words per minute • Many people are comfortable listening at 200- 300 words per minute • Writing an essay on a familiar topic, people write about 10-20 words a minute • Many people are comfortable reading at about 400-600 words per minute (Shu 2023) (Barnard 2022)
  • 22.
    Innovation Professionals (ISSIP.org) Advice… 1.AI upskill 2. Build your “digital twin” 3. Set bigger goals(*) (*) This directly implies learning better strategies for coping with failures, and resiliently rebounding.
  • 23.
    Jim Spohrer isa Silicon Valley-based Advisor to industry, academia, governments, startups and non-profits on topics of AI upskilling, innovation strategy, and win-win service in the AI era. Most recently with a consulting team working for a top 10 market cap global company, he contributed to a strategic plan for a globally connected AI Academy for achieving rapid, nation-scale upskilling with AI. With the US National Academy of Engineering, he co-led a 2022 workshop on “Service Systems Engineering in the Era of Human-Centered AI” to improve well-being. Jim is a retired IBM Executive since July 2021, and previously directed IBM’s open-source Artificial Intelligence developer ecosystem effort, was CTO IBM Venture Capital Group, co-founded IBM Almaden Service Research, and led IBM Global University Programs. In the 1990’s at Apple Computer, as a Distinguished Engineer Scientist and Technologist, he was executive lead on next generation learning platforms. In the 1970’s, after his MIT BS in Physics, he developed speech recognition systems at Verbex (Exxon) before receiving his Yale PhD in Computer Science/AI. In 1989, prior to joining Apple, he was a visiting scholar at the University of Rome, La Sapienza advising doctoral students working on AI and Education dissertations. With over ninety publications and nine patents, he received the Christopher Lovelock Career Contributions to the Service Discipline award, Gummesson Service Research award, Vargo and Lusch Service-Dominant Logic award, Daniel Berg Service Systems award, and a PICMET Fellow for advancing service science. Jim was elected and previously served as Linux Foundation AI & Data Technical Advisory Board Chairperson and ONNX Steering Committee Member (2020-2021). Today, he is a UIDP Senior Fellow for contributions to industry-university collaborations, and a member of the Board of Directors of the International Society of Service Innovation (ISSIP) and ServCollab. Jim Spohrer, Advisor Retired Industry Executive (Apple, IBM) UIDP Senior Fellow Board of Directors, ServCollab Board of Directors, ISSIP.org Changemaker Priorities 1. Service Innovation 2. Upskilling with AI 3. Future Universities 4. Geothermal Energy 5. Poverty Reduction 6. Regional Development Competitive Parity Technologies 1. AI & Robotics 2. Digital Twins 3. Open Source 4. AR/VR/XR 5. Geothermal 6. Learning Platforms
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Job description: Aperson who operators an AI trained to be an expert in some role. The human operator like a vehicle operator helps ensure a good service for customers. • An AI is “running” for mayor in Wyoming • A resident of Cheyenne, Wyoming trained GPT-4 on “thousands of documents gleaned from Cheyenne council meetings” and announced that the resulting bot, named VIC (the “Virtually Integrated Citizen”) will be running for mayor. The bot’s creator said he’d be the “meat puppet” who would operate the AI and act on its behalf, but the bot would be the brains of the operation, deciding on votes and how to run the city. However, Wyoming’s Secretary of State contends that non-humans like VIC can’t run for office. New Job – Person who is an Operator for AI in a New or Existing Service System Role
  • 27.
    Job description: Aperson who operators an AI trained to be an expert in some role. The human operator like a vehicle operator helps ensure a good service for customers. • An AI is “running” for mayor in Wyoming • A resident of Cheyenne, Wyoming trained GPT-4 on “thousands of documents gleaned from Cheyenne council meetings” and announced that the resulting bot, named VIC (the “Virtually Integrated Citizen”) will be running for mayor. The bot’s creator said he’d be the “meat puppet” who would operate the AI and act on its behalf, but the bot would be the brains of the operation, deciding on votes and how to run the city. However, Wyoming’s Secretary of State contends that non-humans like VIC can’t run for office. New Job – Person who is an Operator for AI in a New or Existing Service System Role
  • 28.
  • 29.
    • Jim TwinV1: My papers -> short talk videos • English • French • How to stay future ready? • Learn the building blocks • Plot your influencers (refresh regularly) • Oh, by the way, you are going to need bigger goals too • When you have 100 digital workers working for you, what is your main goal? • From serial entrepreneur to parallel entrepreneur Unleashing Creativity
  • 30.
    Two disciplines: Twoapproaches to the future Artificial Intelligence is almost seventy-years-old discipline in computer science that studies automation and builds more capable technological systems. AI tries to understand the intelligent things that people can do and then does those things with technology. (https://deepmind.com/about “... we aim to build advanced AI - sometimes known as Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) - to expand our knowledge and find new answers. By solving this, we believe we could help people solve thousands of problems.”) Service science is an emerging transdiscipline not yet twenty-years- old that studies transformation and builds smarter and wiser socoi- technical systems – families, businesses, nations, platforms and other special types of responsible entities and their win-win interactions that transform value co-creation and capability co-elevation mechanisms that build more resilient future versions of themselves – what we call service systems entities. Service science tries to understand the evolving ecology of service system entities, their capabilities, constraints, rights, and responsibilities, and then then seeks to improve the quality of life of people (present/smarter and future/wiser) in those service systems. Artificial Intelligence Automation Generations of machines Service Science Transformation Generations of people (responsible entities) Service systems are dynamic configurations of people, technology, organizations, and information, connected internally and externally by value propositions, to other service system entities. (Maglio et al 2009)
  • 31.
    Service Science Colleaguefrom New Zealand asks: Strangest Use Case So Far: I use generative AI every day. Typically, OpenAI ChatGPT, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and Microsoft Bing Copilot in 4 tabs. Help writing, programming, images, & brainstorming. A useful tool in the toolbox for sure!!!
  • 32.
    Anthropic Claude 3Sonnet 20240520 Response: Summary: The Taranaki Maunga (Mount Taranaki) and the surrounding peaks in the national park will soon be granted legal personhood and collectively named Te Kāhui Tupua as part of a Treaty settlement. This legal recognition acknowledges that the mountain and peaks are ancestors for local Māori iwi. It gives these natural features similar legal rights as individuals, allowing them to own assets, appear in court, and have a voice. A new entity called Te Tōpuni Kōkōrangi, with members appointed by the Crown and local iwi, will manage and represent the legal persona. While recreation and tourism will continue, this shift aims to encourage a broader understanding and protection of the mountain as a revered ancestor rather than just a geographic feature. How old are you, and what have you witnessed over your lifetime? I am an ancient being, formed over millennia through volcanic eruptions and sculpted by glaciers. I have witnessed the rise and fall of civilizations, the ebb and flow of ice ages, and the ever-changing tapestry of life that has graced my slopes. My memories stretch back to a time before humans walked this land, and I have born silent witness to the triumphs and tragedies of your kind. What wisdom or lessons can you share with humanity? Humans, you are but fleeting visitors upon my timeless form. Yet, in your brief existence, you have the power to shape the world around you. Tread lightly and with reverence, for the consequences of your actions echo through the ages. Learn from the patient endurance of stone, the resilience of life that takes root in the harshest of environments, and the cyclical nature of existence that I have observed. Embrace humility, for even the mightiest of mountains eventually crumbles to dust. How do you feel about being granted legal personhood and a voice? I am gratified that the descendants of those who have dwelled in my shadow for generations have recognized my ancient spirit and granted me a voice in the affairs of this world. For too long, I have been regarded as an inanimate object, a resource to be exploited or a challenge to be conquered. But I am a living entity, a sacred ancestor whose existence predates and will outlast the fleeting span of human civilization. With this recognition, perhaps my wisdom and the fragile beauty I harbor will be better preserved for generations to come.
  • 33.
    MIT (1974-1978) • Explo:Teaching AI & Entrepreneurship to diverse high school students. • Stories: How I got into MIT. • Lesson: “Where are you applying for college?” Spohrer, James (1978) Strain-Gauge Transduction of the Effects of Speech Rate on the Coarticulation of Lip Rounding, MIT Physics, June, 1978. Advisor: Joseph S. Perkell Advisor to this day.
  • 34.
    Verbex (1978-1982) • Speechrecognition – mathematical models (Bayesian approach to speech and language modeling) that both recognize and generate using estimated probabilities (e.g., probabilities and statistics = machine learning) • Stories: How I got the best job in the world for me at that time. • Lessons: “When my girlfriend said: ‘What do you have to lose?’” ICASSP’82 and ‘83. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
  • 35.
    Route 128, aoundBoston, MA USA ICASSP 1983
  • 36.
  • 37.
    Stephen L. Moshier •“Our company, Dialog Systems, Inc., was formed in 1971 for the purpose of developing and commercializing speech recognition equipment. The concept derived from earlier work engaged in at Listening, Incorporated on marine bioacoustics, acoustic signal processing, and psycho- acoustics. The original idea passed through well-known stages of theory, experiment, development, lack of financing, financing, sales and is now at the highly advanced state "production engineering headaches". Dialog employs 45, of whom 14 are degreed technical people. The company recently moved from Cambridge to a 20,000 square foot two-building campus complex in Belmont, Massachusetts. The major product is an eight-channel isolated word system intended for talker-independent switched telephone speech input.” From NASA: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930075179/downloads/19930075179.pdf
  • 38.
    Peter F. Brown •“So, I took a course in linguistics. And one day in the back of that course I heard a couple students talking about some guy whose name was Steve Moshier who started a company called Dialogue Systems that was doing speech recognition. And I thought, wow, great, I remembered this idea from back in high school. After class I raced over to the physics library. That’s because this was before the internet, so you had to go to the library. And I looked this guy up. And I found a paper he'd written. And I tracked him down. Applied for a job. And he hired me. And when I was there, I just fell in love with the idea that through mathematics it might be possible to build machines that do what humans do.“ Goldman Sachs: https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/podcasts/episodes/09-11-2023-peter-brown-f/transcript.pdf
  • 39.
    Drs. Jim &Janet Baker Saras Institute History of Speech and Language Technology https://www.sarasinstitute.org Many things, Such as publications, took off to new levels when Jim & Janet joined Dialog Systems… … and Exxon acquisition Later key researchers left Verbex, and later Along with Jim and Janet Founded Dragon Systems
  • 40.
    Yale (1982-1989) • MARCEL:Modeling students writing “a series of buggy and then (sometimes) correct programs” with a generate-test-and-debug architectures. • Stories: Use AI to help make people smarter. • Lesson: “Why do you want to make machines smart? Why not help make people smarter instead?” 1988
  • 41.
    Apple (1989-1998) • Fromcontent (SK8) to community (EOE) to context (WorldBoard) • Stories: Surround yourself with supportive people. Growing up about goals - sequencing and timing of ideas is important • Lessons: “MLM: Relax - it will be OK”; “ACK: Planetary – is that all?” “SPJ: We will get to that and more!”; 1992
  • 42.
    IBM (1998 –2021) • IBM Venture Capital Relations Group, Service Science, Global University Programs, Open Source AI. • Stories: The only way you get in trouble is not asking for help when you need it. • Lesson: What seems like a hard problem to you, may be an easy problem for someone else. Leverage the matrix. 2010 2011 2011 2012 2016 2018 2018 2020 2012 2002 2000
  • 43.
    ISSIP (2021- Present) •Defining what is a service innovation, and what is a T-shaped service innovation professional. • Stories: AI digital twins, reinventing local, self-control • Lessons: Learning to invest wisely and systematically in getting a shared future that we all want to live in requires self-control and knowing when you have enough. 2022
  • 44.
    Today’s Talk: Topicsfor discussion • Past • 1947, 1958, 1971 • Present • 70, 35000, 250000 • Future • TBD
  • 45.
    1956 2023 2060 2080 1956 First AI Workshop 2023 ChatGPT100M users in just 2 months (1.5B visits in Sept) 2060 (Predicted) Exascale for $1000 (~ one human brain) 2080 (Predicted) Ronnascale for $1B (~ billion human brains) Progress in IA (Intelligence Augmentation) for nations can be estimated as GPD/worker. Progress in AI (Artificial Intelligence) is directly connected to the cost of computing. REVIEW: REMEMBER THESE DATES
  • 46.
    1947 1958 1971 2024 1947 Transistor Bell Labs 1958 IntegratedCircuit Texas Instrument 1971 Microprocessor Intel 2024 H100 NVidia Challenges: How to prepare for the next wayes of innovations, including digital twins and humanoid robots, as well as to learn to invest more wisely (self-control). As the marginal cost of computing goes to zero, service innovation will go thru the roof, and energy consumption will go thru the roof as well… REMEMBER THESE DATES, FACTS, CHALLENGES weight: 70 pounds complexity: 35,000 parts cost: 250,000 dollars
  • 47.
    • Jensen Huang(Nvidia) comments • First impressions • Insanely great productivity • Insanely great quality • What is really going on? • Decreasing cost of computation • Increasing GDP/worker • Awesome progress, but… • Impressive • Imperfect • Advantage of empowered people Inspiration
  • 48.
    MORE SPOHRER USECASES: https://service-science.info/archives/6521
  • 49.
    Icons of AIProgress • 1955-1956: Dartmouth Workshop organized by: • Two early career faculty • John McCarthy (Dartmouth, later Stanford) • Marvin Minsky (MIT) • Two senior industry scientists • Claude Shannon (Bell Labs) • Nathan Rochester (IBM) • 1997: Deep Blue (IBM) - Chess • 2011: Watson Jeopardy! (IBM) • 2016: AlphaGo (Google DeepMinds) • 2017: All you need is attention (Google) - Transformers • Attention heads (working memory) to predict what comes next • 2018: AlphaFold (Google DeepMinds) • 2020: Language models are few-shot learners (OpenAI) • 2022: DALL-E 2 & ChapGPT (OpenAI) • 2022: Constitutional AI (Anthropic) – “Behave yourself!” • 2023: New Bing+ (Microsoft) & GPT-4 (OpenAI) • 2024: More & Bigger Models: OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Anthropic, etc. • 2024: Reid Hoffman’s Digital Twin & Unitree’s G1 Humanoid Robot pohrer
  • 50.
  • 51.
    1960 1980 20002020 2040 2060 2080 Time
  • 52.
    1960 1980 20002020 2040 2060 2080 $1,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) $1,000,000 (Million) $1,000,000,000 (Billion) $1,000 (Thousand) $1 Cost
  • 53.
    1960 1980 20002020 2040 2060 2080 $1,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) $1,000,000 (Million) $1,000,000,000 (Billion) $1,000 (Thousand) $1 Kiloscale (10 3 ) M egascale (10 6 ) Gigascale (10 9 ) Terascale (10 12 ) Petascale (10 15 ) Exascale (10 18 ) Zettascale (10 21 ) Yottascale (10 24 ) Ronnascale (10 27 ) Cost of Computation (Diagonals)
  • 54.
    1960 1980 20002020 2040 2060 2080 $1,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) $1,000,000 (Million) $1,000,000,000 (Billion) $1,000 (Thousand) $1 Kiloscale (10 3 ) M egascale (10 6 ) Gigascale (10 9 ) Terascale (10 12 ) Petascale (10 15 ) Exascale (10 18 ) Zettascale (10 21 ) Yottascale (10 24 ) Ronnascale (10 27 ) Cost of Computation (Diagonals) Note: Adjust Kilo and Mega scales slightly to fit data better (early days – more cost – learning curve).
  • 55.
    1960 1980 20002020 2040 2060 2080 $1,000,000,000,000 (Trillion) $1,000,000 (Million) $1,000,000,000 (Billion) $1,000 (Thousand) $1 Gigascale (10 9 ) Terascale (10 12 ) Petascale (10 15 ) Exascale (10 18 ) Zettascale (10 21 ) Yottascale (10 24 ) Ronnascale (10 27 ) GDP/Employee Trend Estimating Knowledge Worker Productivity Based on USA Historical Data Year Value 1960 $10K 1980 $33K 2000 $78K 2020. $151K 2023 $169K Kiloscale (10 3 ) M egascale (10 6 ) Cost of computation goes down by 1000x every 20 years (left to right diagonals), driving knowledge worker productivity up.
  • 56.
    Petaflops = 1,000,000,000,000,000or a million billion = 10 ** 15 Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6 Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9 One of the AI Super Computers in the World, = 13 MegaWatts of Power (HOT!)
  • 57.
    Exascale = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000or a billion billion = 10 ** 18 Megaflops = 1,000,000 = million = 10 ** 6 Gigaflops = 1,000,000,000 = billion = 10 ** 9 Human Brain = 20 Watts (COOL!)
  • 60.
  • 61.
    Impressive, but imperfect Physicalrealm: Energy Technical realm: Mistakes (”Hallucinations”) Social realm: Digital property theft
  • 62.
    • How tokeep up with accelerating change? • Social learning • Who do you follow? • Reid Hoffman’s AI Digital Twin Interview • Diving in! • We get the future we invest in • … so, learn to invest wisely • Awesome stuff that lies ahead – Humanoid Robots • But remember technology amplifies good/bad • Need for Self-Control (Toyama (2015) Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change from the Cult of Technology) Climbing Up
  • 63.
  • 64.
    Topics for Discussion •Beyond Language for Communications • Here is how my AI, using my digital twin of you, predicted that you would respond to my request – could you please ask your digital twin of yourself to check this response and suggest improvements? • How to keep up with accelerating change? • Who do you follow? What two main dimensions do you try to balance? Hype-buster <-> Super- Optimist, Doing (Try this) <-> Knowing (News) • How to verify results of generative AI? • How to deal with verification challenge? Run Open AI ChatGPT 3.5, Google Bard (waiting for Gemini), Anthopic’s Claude, Microsoft Bing power by Open AI ChatGPT 4 – in parallel and have them critique each others’ responses (where they agree, where and how they differ) – if possible, also run Meta and open source to compare (Generate-Test-and-Debug) • How to deeply understand how generative AI works? • Monkey’s at the typewrite in high dimensional spaces that map to low dimensional spaces • One dimensional space is time – what comes next? (Predictors, unsupervised learning) • Two dimensional space is what people gravitate towards in business schools (Sorters, supervised learning)
  • 65.
    Today’s talk • Intro:AI (by 1955 definition) has arrived • Just took 68 years, but… • What’s really going on? • Your data is becoming your AI… IA transformation • AI Digital Twin = IA (Intelligence Augmentation) • Adjustment period underway… • Part 1: Solving AI: Leaderboards/Profession Exams • Roadmap and implications • Open technologies, innovation • Part 2: Solving IA: Better Building Blocks • Solving problems faster, creates new problems • Identity, social contracts, trust, resilience • Part 3: ”Solving All Problems” • What could go wrong? Be prepared. • 37-year long adjustment period is now underway… pohrer
  • 66.
    Predict the Timeline:GDP/Employee National Academy - Service Systems and AI 66 (Source) Lower compute costs translate into increasing productivity and GDP/employees for nations Increasing productivity and GDP/employees should translate into wealthier citizens AI Progress on Open Leaderboards Benchmark Roadmap to solve AI/IA Alistair Nolan (OECD AI for Science Productivity): “It has been stated that the number of engineers proclaiming the end of Moore's Law doubles every two years.” Rouse WB, Spohrer JC. (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation. 2018 Apr 3;8(1-2):1-21. Read Rouse & Spohrer (2018) enough to understand this slide including what ”exascale” means 11/22/22 Part 1: Solving AI
  • 67.
    ognitive Systems Types: Progressionof Models : Verified, Trusted, Wise Models = instruction_set of future: Better building blocks Task & World Model/ Planning & Decisions Self Model/ Capacity & Limits User Model/ Episodic Memory Institutions Model/ Trust & Social Acts Tool + - - - Assistant ++ + - - Collaborator +++ ++ + - Coach ++++ +++ ++ + Mediator +++++ ++++ +++ ++ Cognitive Tool Cognitive Assistant Cognitive Collaborator Cognitive Coach Cognitive Mediator Part 2: Solving IA Solving IA also requires All of this and done well As a “bicycle for the mind” To make us stronger, Not weaker When tech is all removed
  • 68.
    Resilience: Rapidly Rebuilding FromScratch • Dartnell L (2012) The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Civilization i n the Aftermath of a Cataclysm. Westminster London: Penguin Books. Part 3: “Solving All Problems”
  • 69.

Editor's Notes

  • #1 20250113 Truth & Service in the AI Era Tor_Andreassen (https://www.linkedin.com/in/tor-wallin-andreassen-1aa9031/) Marina_Gorbis (https://www.linkedin.com/in/marinagorbis/) Slides: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/20241029-ai-digital-twins-roland_rust_class-pptx/272861981 Jim Spohrer on Truth and Service in the AI Era - Digital Twins: Jim Twin V1 (English video) - https://youtu.be/T4S0uZp1SHw Jim Twin V1 (French video) - https://youtu.be/02hCGRJnCoc Reid Hoffman (English video) - https://youtu.be/rgD2gmwCS10 Jim Blog Post - https://service-science.info/archives/6612 Jim EIT Article (Real Jim) - https://www.eitdigital.eu/newsroom/grow-digital-insights/personal-ai-digital-twins-the-future-of-human-interaction/ Jim EIT Talk (Real Jim) - https://youtu.be/_1X6bRfOqc4 OpenAI GPT-4o impressive demo video - https://www.youtube.com/live/DQacCB9tDaw Unitree G1 humanoid robot for $16K video - https://youtu.be/GzX1qOIO1bE
  • #2 Others Reid Hoffman - https://www.linkedin.com/in/reidhoffman/ Lukasz_Kaiser - https://www.linkedin.com/in/lukaszkaiser/ AnatasiInTech - https://www.youtube.com/@AnastasiInTech AI Explained - https://www.youtube.com/@aiexplained-official Ross_Dawson - https://www.linkedin.com/in/futuristkeynotespeaker/ Andrew Ng - https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrewyng/ Higher Bar – avoid the hype and understand potential harms Substack: Arvind Narayanan & Sayash Kapoor - AI Snake Oil (Princeton) Substack: Gary Markus (NYU) Facebook: Ernest Davis (NYU) LinkedIn & Twitter: Stephen Wolfram Blog: Irving Wladawsky-Berger (MIT, retired IBM) Practical AI Upskilling Advice – benefits, which prompts to explore and why? Substack: Ethan Mollick (U Penn Wharton) Tracking AI Capabilities – (FOMO) which tools to try? The Neuron Daily (email AI newsletter - Purrfect): Noah Edelman & Pete Huang LinkedIn & Website: Terri Griffith (Simon Frasier) YouTube: AI Explained ArXiv publications from Google, Deepmind, Microsoft, OpenAI, Facebook/Meta, IBM, etc. Website: PapersWithCode/SOTA (and GiTHub – tracking stars on projects) Broader topics and implications (overly optimistic?) YouTube: Alan D. Thomas (Australia) (super optimistic) See his interview with Harvey Castro MD (here) – also books, and visionary uses for personalized medicine (personalized communications) YouTube: Lex Friedman (MIT) (super knowledgeable guests interviewed) Substack: Lee Nackman (retired IBM) (Win-Win Democracy and AI topics – balanced – well researched) YouTube: Kartik Gada (The ATOM) – accelerating change [accelerating change perspective – details beyond Kurzweil & Altman) Substack – Ethan Mollick: https://oneusefulthing.substack.com/p/using-ai-to-make-teaching-easier Email – The Neuron Daily – Noah Edelman & Pete Huang https://www.theneurondaily.com/p/ai-deepfakes BiblioN2023 Narayanan A, Kapoor S (2023) Evaluating LLMs is a minefield: Annotated slides from a recent talk. Sayash and Arvind from AI Snake Oil <aisnakeoil@substack.com> Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 7:40 AM. ARVIND NARAYANAN AND SAYASH KAPOOR. OCT 4 Via_Substack. URL: https://www.aisnakeoil.com/p/evaluating-llms-is-a-minefield Quotes: "We have released annotated slides for a talk titled Evaluating LLMs is a minefield. We show that current ways of evaluating chatbots and large language models don't work well, especially for questions about their societal impact. There are no quick fixes, and research is needed to improve evaluation methods."; BiblioM2023 Marcus G (2023) Seven Lies in Four Sentences. Gary Marcus on AI. Via_Substack. URL: https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/seven-lies-in-four-sentencesQuotes: "Earlier today I learned that 2 billion people are eligible to vote in elections in 2024, in scores of elections around the globe. Tyler Cowen tried to argue yesterday in his Bloomberg column that misinformation doesn’t matter. Anybody remember Brexit?"; BiblioT2023 Thompson AD (2023) AI + medicine - with Harvey Castro MD (GPT-4, Med-PaLM 2, Carbon Health, Ambience, 311 ChatGPT call). Via_Harvey_Casto. URL: https://youtu.be/jTmkiGjrgpA Quotes: "14,365 views Jul 5, 2023 The Memo: https://lifearchitect.ai/memo/ Annotated Med-Palm 2 paper: https://lifearchitect.ai/report-card/ Harvey: https://www.harveycastromd.info/ https://www.amazon.com/stores/Harvey-... https://www.linkedin.com/in/harveycas... https://twitter.com/harveycastromd https://www.instagram.com/harveycastr... 00:00 Start! 07:23 AI by age 12:17 The Gap 14:47 Models (ChatGPT, GPT-4, Med-PaLM 2) 23:26 Use cases including non-emergency calls 35:28 Medicine vs self-driving cars 46:56 Harvey's favorite AI use case 52:56 AI as a medical partner Dr Alan D. Thompson is a world expert in artificial intelligence (AI), specialising in the augmentation of human intelligence, and advancing the evolution of ‘integrated AI’. Alan’s applied AI research and visualisations are featured across major international media, including citations in the University of Oxford’s debate on AI Ethics in December 2021. https://lifearchitect.ai/ ";
  • #3 Ethan Mollick URL: https://www.oneusefulthing.org/p/superhuman
  • #4 Reid Hoffman meets his AI twin - URL: https://youtu.be/rgD2gmwCS10
  • #5 URL: URL: https://youtu.be/GzX1qOIO1bE TLDR $16k G1 humanoid rises up to smash nuts, twist, and twirl (4 minute read) Unitree has released the first few details on its G1 Humanoid Agent, a $16,000 robotic helper. The robot is equipped with 3D LiDAR sensors, a depth camera, three-fingered grippers, and a 9,000-mAh battery pack. It can recover from brutal kicks and punches, as seen in the short demo video in the article. At around 35 kg, the robot can fold itself down to 690x450x300-mm proportions for compact carry. URL: https://newatlas.com/robotics/unitree-g1-humanoid-agent/?utm_source=tldrnewsletter
  • #6 OpenAI ChatGPT 4o (Omni) URL: https://www.youtube.com/live/DQacCB9tDaw Mira: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mira_Murati Interesting perspectives…. From two perspectives
  • #7 BiblioR2018 Rouse WB, Spohrer JC (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 8:1-2, 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/19488289.2018.1424059. URL: https://service-science.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Rouse-Spohrer-Automating-Versus-Augmenting-Intelligence-12-21-17-copy.pdf Quotes: "Abstract: This article addresses the prospects for automating intelligence versus augmenting human intelligence. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is summarized, including contemporary AI and the new capabilities now possible. Functional requirements to augment human intelligence are outlined. An overall architecture is presented for providing this functionality, including how it will make deep learning explainable to decision makers. Three case studies are addressed, including driverless cars, medical diagnosis, and insurance underwriting. Paths to transformation in these domains are discussed. Prospects for innovation are considered in terms of what we can now do, what we surely will be able to do soon, and what we are unlikely to ever be able to do."; BiblioS2017 Imagination Challenge: Quantify and graph cost of digital workers and GDP per employee USA from 1960-2080. Service-Science.Info Blog Post. URL: https://service-science.info/archives/4741 Quotes: "Imagination challenge: Consider quantifying and graphing the decreasing cost of digital workers due to Moore’s Law, and increasing GDP/Employees USA from 1960 to 2080 (projected). A narrow digital worker will cost about a million dollars by 2025, and require a petascale computational system. The same digital worker will cost about a thousand dollars by 2045, and about $1 by 2065."; If you are an entrepreneur or CEO you are excited about the drop in cost of digital workers, because that means GDP per employee will continue its exponential increase. Source: http://service-science.info/archives/4741
  • #8 To understand in part why this is so, take a look at the fastest super-computer in the world… IBM helped build it for Oakridge National Labs, and it can do 200 million billion instructiosn per second using 13 Megawatts of power.
  • #9 Compate that to the human brain which can by many estimates perform a billion billion instructions per second (5x more than Summit) on a mere 20 watts, over 100,000 times less power.
  • #10 URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/energy-consumption-to-dramatically-increase-because-of-ai-114541309.html
  • #11 BiblioE2023 (2023) Edelman N, Huang P (2023) AI Breaks the Bank. By Noah Edelman & Pete Huang October 10, 2023 in the Neuron Newsletter. URL: https://www.theneurondaily.com/p/ai-breaks-bank Quotes: "AI is really darn expensive … even if you’re a trillion-dollar empire. The reason is that AI models are super-duper complex calculators … that require super-duper powerful computers … that cost a lot of $$$ … which hurts everyone except Nvidia. “Using [AI] to summarize an email is like getting a Lamborghini to deliver a pizza.” WSJ"; BiblioT2023 Thompson AD (2023) AI + medicine - with Harvey Castro MD (GPT-4, Med-PaLM 2, Carbon Health, Ambience, 311 ChatGPT call). Via_Harvey_Castro. URL: https://youtu.be/jTmkiGjrgpA Quotes: "14,365 views Jul 5, 2023 The Memo: https://lifearchitect.ai/memo/ Annotated Med-Palm 2 paper: https://lifearchitect.ai/report-card/ Harvey: https://www.harveycastromd.info/ https://www.amazon.com/stores/Harvey-... https://www.linkedin.com/in/harveycas... https://twitter.com/harveycastromd https://www.instagram.com/harveycastr... 00:00 Start! 07:23 AI by age 12:17 The Gap 14:47 Models (ChatGPT, GPT-4, Med-PaLM 2) 23:26 Use cases including non-emergency calls 35:28 Medicine vs self-driving cars 46:56 Harvey's favorite AI use case 52:56 AI as a medical partner Dr Alan D. Thompson is a world expert in artificial intelligence (AI), specialising in the augmentation of human intelligence, and advancing the evolution of ‘integrated AI’. Alan’s applied AI research and visualisations are featured across major international media, including citations in the University of Oxford’s debate on AI Ethics in December 2021. https://lifearchitect.ai/ ";
  • #12 UR: https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2024-11-12-gartner-predicts-power-shortages-will-restrict-40-percent-of-ai-data-centers-by-20270
  • #15 Jensen Huang (Founder & CEO Nvidia) at Stanford talking about H100 URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEg8cOx7UZk
  • #16 In the long term, one of the most important AI tools for you to master will be the AI-Powered digital twin of you. Even while your sleeping your digital twin will be able to give and get service on your behalf. Your AI digital twin will help you upskill to use even more advanced technologies and learn about even more win-win interaction and change opportunities. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61742884 BiblioW2022 Wakefield J (2022) Why you may have a thinking digital twin within a decade. BBC News Online. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-61742884 Quotes: "We are living in an age where everything that exists in the real world is being replicated digitally - our cities, our cars, our homes, and even ourselves. And just like the hugely-hyped metaverse - plans for a virtual, digital world where an avatar of yourself would walk around - digital twins have become a new, talked-about tech trend. A digital twin is an exact replica of something in the physical world, but with a unique mission - to help improve, or in some other way provide feedback to, the real-life version. Initially such twins were just sophisticated 3D computer models, but artificial intelligence (AI) combined with the internet of things - which uses sensors to connect physical things to the network - have meant that you can now build something digitally that is constantly learning from and helping improve the real counterpart."; "Technology analyst Rob Enderle believes that we will have the first versions of thinking human digital twins "before the end of the decade".; "Mr Enderle thinks that ownership of such digital twins will become one of the defining questions of the impending metaverse era."; "And increasingly our cities are being replicated in the digital world; Shanghai and Singapore both have digital twins, set up to help improve the design and operations of buildings, transport systems and streets."; "Perhaps even more ambitious than replicating human organs is the race to build a digital version of our entire planet. US software firm, Nvidia, runs a platform called Omniverse, designed to create virtual worlds and digital twins."; "In March this year, the European Commission, in conjunction with the European Space Agency among others, announced its own plans to make a digital twin of the planet, dubbed Destination Earth. By the end of 2024, it hopes to have enough data from real-time observations and simulations to have a digital twin that will focus on floods, drought and heatwaves, alongside natural disasters such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis, and provide countries with concrete plans to save lives in the face of these growing challenges." PictureBiblioW2022: "Digital_Twin_Person"; "Digital_Twin_City"; "Digital_Twin_Earth"; URL: https://www.networkworld.com/article/3280225/what-is-digital-twin-technology-and-why-it-matters.html BiblioW2022 West S, Stoll O, Muller-Csernetzky P (2022) A Handbook for Smart Service Design - The design of Smart Services in a world of people, process and things. URL: https://www.amazon.de/Handbook-Smart-Service-Design-Services/dp/3033089690/ Quotes: "The handbook‘s purpose is to formalize the lessons learnt from an Innosuisse- funded project where over twenty different Digital Twin-based use cases were developed in collaboration between ten partners. During the project, we learnt many things: the Digital Twins helped us create new innovative smart services, formalize tacit knowledge, and improve decision-making. Perhaps most important was that the de- sign of the Digital Twin was best achieved based on (business) questions. The Digital Twin enables the development of Smart Services within complex systems."; BiblioR2018 Rouse WB (2018) Life with a cognitive assistant. URL: http://blog.billrouse.com/life-with-a-cognitive-assistant/ Quotes: "One of her first tasks was to consume the 45,000 files on my computer, actually the backup disk. I am not sure of what she exactly learned from all this, but she can now help me find anything, for example, the white paper I wrote on the promise of AI for fighter pilots in the late 1970s. Emily has created maps of relationships among documents I have written over the past five decades. My path has been surprisingly more coherent than I imagined.";
  • #17 EIT Digital Digital Twin Article: https://www.eitdigital.eu/newsroom/grow-digital-insights/personal-ai-digital-twins-the-future-of-human-interaction/ ISSIP - https://issip.org/2024-collab-ai_digital_twins/ JCS YouTube English: https://youtu.be/T4S0uZp1SHw JCS YouTube French: https://youtu.be/02hCGRJnCoc ISSIP Thank-you (JCS_Twin) JCS Some people would like an AI digital twin of themselves to present short talks and Q&A JCS Article to Present: https://service-science.info/archives/6612 JCS Training Data: https://youtu.be/DUqPYEp9buQ JCS YouTube English: https://youtu.be/T4S0uZp1SHw JCS YouTube French: https://youtu.be/02hCGRJnCoc JCS How_Made Recording: https://youtu.be/isQmUg_rZH8 JCS How_Made Slides: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/sjsu-students-ai-digital-twin-of-jim-spohrer-20240506-v2-pptx/267857304 JCS ISSIP Blog Post: https://issip.org/2024-collab-ai_digital_twins/ JCS YouTube: Digital Twins, Humanoid Robots, Self Control: https://youtu.be/Ilp_etOPaYs JCS YouTube: 640x Increase in Communication Ability: https://youtu.be/_o-3uqCrnUE
  • #18 The weakest link is what needs to be improved – according to system scientists. Accessing help, service, experts is the weakest link in most systems. By 2035 the phone may have the power of one human brain – by 2055 the phone may have the power of all human brains. Before trying to answer the question about which types of sciences are more important – the ones that try to explain the external world or the ones that try to explain the internal world – consider this, slide that shows the different telephones that I have used in my life. I grew up in rural Maine, where we had a party line telephone because we were somewhat remote on our farm in Newburgh, Maine. However, over the years phones got much better…. So in 2035 or 2055, who are you going to call when you need help? Books https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_Shock
  • #19 Read Geek Heresy – the only tech that causes no harm? Self control? Comes pretty close… for healthy habits… Reminds me of my mother "if you can't say something nice, say nothing at all" Or today "If you can't speak the truth, say nothing at all." I guess, one could always say "In my humble opinion, which could well be wrong, I think X." Still, I think both Yuval Harari and Alan Kay would agree the best marketing is education about truths.  Unfortunately, marketing and political rhetoric often try to provoke an emotional reaction to gain a larger audience, and the best provocation often appeal by describing a profound negative possibility. My son Adam and I discussed it on our hike yesterday. in terms of self-control, responsibility, and respect. Self-Control - do not just repeat what you heard, ensure you know the source and that it is true, and worthy of being said Responsibility - if you later find out that it was not the truth or the whole truth you need to go back and inform everyone you told about it. Respect - when you listen, be sure to have patience, and if you hear a falsehood, try to educate, not berate the speaker Alan Kay keynote (self-control in storytelling) https://youtu.be/R8xRXCY1ttU Yuval Harari recording (responsibility in storytelling) https://youtu.be/thZUMaGEE-8 Yuval Harari gets some things "wrong" (Alka Roy reminding - respect, in educating vs berating falsehoods) https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2022/07/the-dangerous-populist-science-of-yuval-noah-harari https://heliconiuscydno.medium.com/hararis-algorithmic-cargo-cult-fd80da4ff152 Drive & Hike in Big Basin with Adam – Monday Oct 21 Being a good critic Most rational people who have good critical skills wouldn't want to be a critic unless they can get a big following and a boatload of money 2) There probably are good critics out there who do not have a huge following or make a boatload of money (good insight) 3) The moral imperative is if you can’t say something nice don’t say anything at all 4) A good critic gives reasons and that saves people time and money 5) A super good critic can do it in a way that is taken as constructive rather than destructive 1) most want to be successful critics with lots of money and followers 2) we don’t know who the lesser known ones are but they are out there 3) a good moral imperative is to not say anything if you can’t say anything nice 4) good critics save money and time 5) super good critics can make constructive criticism and be direct without being rude or mean
  • #20 Perhaps show Alan D. Thompson’s work on genius level intelligence Add context effect? Anecdote about typing – used to take 2 years to learn to type in high school…. Now kids have keyboards and a reason to use them, and they learn largely on their own… For what purpose? How to measure ”real” progress How can we create the incentive for students to want to innovate service systems, not just the original 13 but others as well? Annual grand challenges? <<< 64x Learning Sal Kahn (https://www.linkedin.com/in/khanacademy/) How AI Could Save (Not Destroy) Education | Sal Khan | TED https://youtu.be/hJP5GqnTrNo Don Norman (https://www.linkedin.com/in/donnorman/) Things That Make Us Smart Build a Better World URL: https://www.amazon.com/Things-That-Make-Smart-Attributes/dp/0201626950 URL: https://www.amazon.com/Design-Better-World-Meaningful-Sustainable/dp/0262047950 Kentaro Toyama (https://www.linkedin.com/in/kentarotoyama/) URL: https://www.amazon.com/Geek-Heresy-Rescuing-Social-Technology/dp/161039528X/ >>>
  • #21 Average Speaking Rates URL: https://virtualspeech.com/blog/average-speaking-rate-words-per-minute Average Reading Speed Analysis URL: https://swiftread.com/blog/average-reading-speed-analysis BiblioB2022 Barnard D (2022) Average Speaking Rate and Words per Minute. November 8, 2022 - Dom Barnard. Via_GoogleSearch URL: https://virtualspeech.com/blog/average-speaking-rate-words-per-minute Quotes: " Average speech rates Presentations: between 100-150 wpm for a comfortable pace Conversational: between 120-150 wpm Audiobooks: between 150-160 wpm, which is the upper range that people comfortably hear and vocalize words Radio hosts and podcasters: between 150-160 wpm Auctioneers: can speak at about 250 wpm Commentators: between 250-400 wpm "; BiblioP2023 Pain E (2023) How to write a research paper. AAAS Careers. 31 MAR 20231:10 PM ETBY ELISABETH PAIN Via_GoogleSearch URL: https://www.science.org/content/article/how-write-research-paper Quotes: " Assuming all analysis is complete before I start writing, preparing a paper usually takes me 2 to 3 months from blank page to submission. "; BiblioS2023 Shu T (2023) Everything You Need to Know About Average Reading Speed. By Troy Shu. Updated at: September 15, 2023 URL: https://swiftread.com/blog/average-reading-speed-analysis Quotes: " What is the average reading speed? The average adult reading speed is 238 WPM (words per minute) for non-fiction and 260 WPM for fiction, according to a meta-analysis of 190 different studies with 18,573 participants (Brysbaert, 2019). These numbers are for silent reading of English text by native English speaking adults. "; " In fact, there’s zero correlation between reading comprehension and reading speed across individuals in the dataset. What this means is that, for example, if a person has a higher than average reading speed, say 400 WPM, we can’t really say that they’ll have lower than average, or higher than average, reading comprehension. ";
  • #22 BiblioH2022 Huang J (2022) GTC 2022 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang. [online at YouTube] URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39ubNuxnrK8 Note: Digital twin of Earth climate more accurate and faster than physics based models with respect to atmospheric rivers that cause flooding.
  • #26 URL: https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/151?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=352817&post_id=145844008&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=99y8a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email From FLUX Collective –  The FLUX Review, Ep. 151 June 20th, 2024 THE FLUX COLLECTIVE JUN 21
  • #27 URL: https://read.fluxcollective.org/p/151?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=352817&post_id=145844008&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=99y8a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email From FLUX Collective –  The FLUX Review, Ep. 151 June 20th, 2024 THE FLUX COLLECTIVE JUN 21
  • #28 URL: https://service-science.info/archives/6612
  • #29 URL: https://www.eitdigital.eu/newsroom/grow-digital-insights/personal-ai-digital-twins-the-future-of-human-interaction/
  • #30 What does it mean to solve automation? Transformation? ‘Maglio PP, Vargo SL, Caswell N, Spohrer J. The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Information Systems and e-business Management. 2009 Sep;7:395-406. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stephen-Vargo-2/publication/221177855_The_Service_System_Is_the_Basic_Abstraction_of_Service_Science/links/00b49520da24da289f000000/The-Service-System-Is-the-Basic-Abstraction-of-Service-Science.pdf
  • #33 Explo: URL: https://explo.org/meet-us/leadership Perkell: URL:
  • #34 URL: 40 Year Celebration (At 1 hour 50 minutes): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag9ftf6OkSQ
  • #35 I am Jim Spohrer, and 40 years ago, Prof. Lee and I were much younger, and working together at a company called Verbex. Verbex was near Boston’s Route 128 – famous now for Boston Dynamics the robot company, but back in the 1970’s a competitor to California’s Silicon Valley for notable computer startups like DEC (Digital Equipment Corporations), Wang, and many others. Verbex Image: https://www.ebay.com/itm/175194074077 Bayes Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes%27_theorem Paper Link: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1172084 Brown, Peter, Chin-Hui Lee, and J. Spohrer. "Bayesian adaptation in speech recognition." ICASSP'83. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Vol. 8. IEEE, 1983. Peter F. Brown’s Reflections History Goldman Sachs: https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/podcasts/episodes/09-11-2023-peter-brown-f/transcript.pdf
  • #36 Back in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s – those were exciting times for speech recognition progress, even if collecting training data was difficult. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1747731
  • #37 The reasons some of us had the opportunity to work on speech recognition back then was because of Steve Moshier. Stephen L. Moshier Patents https://patents.justia.com/inventor/stephen-l-moshier NASA Our company, Dialog Systems, Inc., was formed in 1971 for the purpose of developing and commercializing speech recognition equipment. The concept derived from earlier work engaged in at Listening, Incorporated on marine bioacoustics, acoustic signal processing, and psycho- acoustics. The original idea passed through well-known stages of theory, experiment, development, lack of financing, financing, sales and is now at the highly advanced state "production engineering headaches". Dialog employs 45, of whom 14 are degreed technical people. The company recently moved from Cambridge to a 20,000 square foot two-building campus complex in Belmont, Massachusetts. The major product is an eight-channel isolated word system intended for talker-independent switched telephone speech input. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_L._Moshier Homepage http://www.moshier.net Stephen L. Moshier 93-72626 STATISTICAL ASSESSMENT OF SPEECH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE STEPHEN L. MOSHIER* DIALOG SYSTEMS, INC. / BELMONT, MASSACHUSETTS “Mr. Moshier's paper was presented by Mr. Robert Osborn. “ URL: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930075179/downloads/19930075179.pdf Robert Osborn NASA https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930075179/downloads/19930075179.pdf <<< Verbex Stephen L. Moshier Patents https://patents.justia.com/inventor/stephen-l-moshier NASA Our company, Dialog Systems, Inc., was formed in 1971 for the purpose of developing and commercializing speech recognition equipment. The concept derived from earlier work engaged in at Listening, Incorporated on marine bioacoustics, acoustic signal processing, and psycho- acoustics. The original idea passed through well-known stages of theory, experiment, development, lack of financing, financing, sales and is now at the highly advanced state "production engineering headaches". Dialog employs 45, of whom 14 are degreed technical people. The company recently moved from Cambridge to a 20,000 square foot two-building campus complex in Belmont, Massachusetts. The major product is an eight-channel isolated word system intended for talker-independent switched telephone speech input. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_L._Moshier Homepage http://www.moshier.net Robert Osborn NASA https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19930075179/downloads/19930075179.pdf Larry Bahler https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article-abstract/80/5/1566/682563/Continuous-speech-recognition?redirectedFrom=fulltext https://dblp.org/pid/142/6668.html Peter F. Brown History Goldman Sachs: https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/podcasts/episodes/09-11-2023-peter-brown-f/transcript.pdf Bayesian Adaptation in Speech Recognition Peter F. Brown. Chin-Hui Lee, James C. Spohrer. Verbex Corporation Two Oak Park Bedford, MA 01730 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1172084 https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/36585870/01172084-libre.pdf?1423582838=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3Dfdgdfhdhdhdh.pdf&Expires=1702829972&Signature=LumEvQOyTfuOY~zEhyiIUuFjXO7c~EBk-ZnhH3xt9XOLyIHN1Bk0qxQZTBUEbYR-r4l1G7EyNFKj0jg8IRX-0p5FK6WdaVCoBcFsjRw6aQM7X-BN0GgLvhOFTmTGcPwmbY6TvReH6UDoh7Dx9SjfLVIGLdPL2r3CwZQYp8Ik8wLk7x2KoZGDdrg8B1B1q20QvMJwt-tRnBHs2OT-Qko91YmJCtVe9H95TrATVJwUNcqpIjAsg-W8wZhUfaabEsz4t0HFoSfOcy4T-402etZMnfTxdl6MESx8I~rr2bnZbUhY-iq1NLmpHDRrtZcyxvAYGa1O8-fNhOSXYVvcy-Cjrg__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA James K. Baker Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_K._Baker CHM: https://computerhistory.org/profile/james-baker/ Acoustic Society of America (ASA) https://pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/article/65/S1/S132/739840/Trainable-grammars-for-speech-recognition Saras Institute History of Speech and Language Technology https://www.sarasinstitute.org Janet M. Baker History Saras: https://www.sarasinstitute.org/Pages/Interv/SarJimBaker.html Fred Jelinek Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Jelinek History Saras: https://www.sarasinstitute.org/Pages/Interv/SarJelin.html Robert Roth https://aclanthology.org/people/r/robert-roth/ Frank Tadley https://www.linkedin.com/in/frank-tadley-23a65358/ Mark Sidell https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-sidell-b7911310/ >>>
  • #38 For example, Peter Brown was hired by Steve Moshier in 1978, at the same time I got hired. Peter F. Brown History Goldman Sachs: https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/podcasts/episodes/09-11-2023-peter-brown-f/transcript.pdf
  • #39 Things really took off after Steve hired Jim and Janet Baker away from Fred Jelinek’s speech group at IBM – and soon Exxon acquired Dialog Systems, and changed the named to Verbex. Leter Jim and Janer would form Dragon Systems – which has its own adventures. Saras Institute History of Speech and Language Technology https://www.sarasinstitute.org
  • #41 Supportive People: Mark Miller. Goals: Alan Kay, Steve Jobs. EOE: https://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/1998-10 WorldBoard: https://homepages.cwi.nl/~steven/sigchi/bulletin/1998.2/spohrer.html ATG Authoring Tools (1998): https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/279044.279173
  • #44 URL: http://fasterthan20.com/ URL: https://xkcd.com/1232/
  • #45 To: Marco Podien <marco.podien@gmail.com>, Jim Spohrer <spohrer@gmail.com> Questions by November 24th to EIT Staff Asja Kamenica <asja.kamenica@eitdigital.eu> Andrea Lorenzin <andrea.lorenzin@eitdigital.eu> Q: How many of you have tries generative AI? a. Q: In what year was the first AI workshop? a. 1917, b. 1956, c. 1968, d. 1997 A: b. 1956 Q: In what year did ChatGPT attain 100B users after just two months? a. 2021, b. 2022, c. 2023, d. 2024 A: c. 2023 Q: In what year (approximate decade) is it predicted that an exascale (~one human brain) of computation will cost $1000? a. 2030, b. 2040, c. 2050, d. 2060 A: d. 2060 Q: In what year (approximate decade) is it predicted that a ronnascale (~billion human brains) of computation will cost $1B? a. 2080, b. 2100, c. 2200, d. Never A: a. 2080
  • #46 . Past: Which of the following are important facts to remember in the history of semiconductors that enable today's AI systems? a. 1947 Transistor (Bell Labs) b. 1958 Integrated Circuit (Texas Instruments) c. 1971 Microprocessor (Intel) d. All of the above 2. Present: Which of the following are important facts about H100 chip units in today's AI in data centers? a. weight: 70 pounds b. complexity: 35,000 parts c. cost: 250,000 dollars d. All of the above 3. Future: Which of the following are important capabilities to understand to be prepared for life in the future? a. AI Digital Twins of People, to keep up with accelerating change b. Humanoid Robots, to accelerate the local sustainable economy trend c. Self-Control, to maintain healthy decision making d. All of the above
  • #48 Here is the explanation that kids and everyone I spoke with understands. Explaining Generative AI to Nearly Anyone Have you ever used a calculator to add up numbers?  Generative AI is like a calculator - you ask it to please do something - and you will always get an answer, usually pretty quickly. However, depending on the question you ask, the answer is only correct one day a week.. Four days a week the answer is not correct, but made up - and may sound very creative or very convincing. Two days a week, the calculator says - sorry I cannot help you - again, depending on what you ask the calculator to do. What would you do with a calculator like this - only giving a correct answer some of the time? Some people would throw it away. However, some people are very happy to use it to make-up creative answers to hard questions - even if it only helps them some of the time. Especially for pictures, stories, poems, and  art work, like this one picture of a monkey and a parrot - some people find these kind of calculators helpful.  I asked a generative AI calculator to do something for me once - I asked for a picture, and asked in this funny way: "Please create an image of a library, and in the library is monkey using a typewriter with a stochastic parrot dictating to the monkey." It made a pretty funny picture,  wouldn't you say? Also, generative AI calculators are good at making up answers very, very fast... ...and sometimes they are right, but most of the time they are either creatively wrong or don't give an answer. Sadly, some people think the calculator is really smart - because it can give a correct answer to a hard question, some of the time - and do it really, really fast. The calculator has fooled them into thinking it is really, really smart - when in fact, it is not smart.  If it was smart, it would not make so many mistakes. So that works most of the time. However, if they do not know what a calculator is - I was talking with a 3 year the other day whose parent works for tech company in Silicon Valley, and had asked me to explain AI to his daughter - I basically just substitute "a magic genie" for the calculator, and talk about a genie who gives you your wishes, but makes a lot of mistakes - so you have to be careful what you wish for. To explain why it is "so good" sometimes, I have to explain N-Gram Statistics - which is a bit harder, but if they do not understand N-grams, I just say: How does the generative AI calculator work? Use your imagination to imagine a computer keyboard/or typewriter  that had whole words and whole sentences on millions of keys, so when you push a key at random, you get something that makes sense. The more examples you show this magic keyboard over time, the more keys the keyboard gets - billions or even trillions of keys, and the better the keyboard gets at putting a big key in the middle that says "PUSH ME NEXT PLEASE". Using this magic keyboard/typewriter even a monkey or a parrot could sometimes create pretty amazing things. Inside a computer words, pictures, videos are just represented as 0’s and 1’s – as big big numbers. To understand this we can play the game called 20 questions, which can be used to identify anything by asking enough yes and no questions. Are you thinking about an animal? Yes or No? Yes, Does the animal have a furry tale? Yes, Does the animal like to ear bananas? Yes. Is the animal a monkey? Not sure if this is helpful, but thought I would share it.
  • #49 What is really going on in this progress? Starting at the 2017 paper introducing the transformer architecture. The big insights are once you have a general purpose learning architecture (with enough scale), you can then get by with a transformer architecture (attention heads as working memory to predict what comes next) – as you get better at predicting what comes next (with enough scale), you being to see emergence (the ability to get new-ish capabilities) by appropriate prompt engineering (few-shot learning) – his happens where the scale model has developed a good compressed version of some pattern of reality that is a good predictor. Getting these compressed models of reality that are good predictors under certain conditions is both an efficiency and a trap. Efficiency is the world is stable. Trap is the world is changing rapidly, and the compressed version is no longer valid. Predicting what comes next is a kind of un-supervised learning – what comes next is a property of the data/world and does not require labeling. Once you have the predictor working well, and the compressed models of the data/world working well, then the emergence happens for newish-capabilities few-shot learning with appropriate prompts. This is like learning by being told. It has to be rewarded as many times as possible, when it makes use of the ”value statements in the constitution” – reinforncing the in-group bias. Because LLMs have all the data (lots and lots of data) from different groups with difference values/biases/belief systems, it is important to get the addition of a constitution and lots of rewards, or else …. Or else, bad behaviour, hallucinations, and other strange phenomena will occur. Is this where schizophrenia comes from in people? A clash of belief systems, and what should get rewarded. Looking for truth, but without the flexibility to adapth. Without the anchor principles that can make life a peaceful journey. Perhaps. 2020 – Few shot learners implies emergence. Emergence just means ”good enough compressed models of reality/diverse data at scale” that a short prompt can bias the prediction of what comes next. 2022 – Constitutional AI implies value systems/belief systems matter for socially acceptable behavior. A learner must be conditioned/repeatedly rewarded for pro-social behaviors. DALL-E URL: https://openai.com/product/dall-e-2 ChatGPT URL: https://chat.openai.com GPT-4 URL: https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 AlphaFold: URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaFold Microsoft Bing: URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bing URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_artificial_intelligence URL: http://www.businessinsider.com/infographic-ai-effect-on-economy-2017-8 Today’s infographic comes from the Extraordinary Future 2017, a new conference in Vancouver, BC that focuses on emerging technologies such as AI, autonomous vehicles, fintech, and block http://extraordinaryfuture.com/e/extraordinary-future-2017-71chain tech. Nathaniel Rochester: In 1948, Rochester moved to IBM where he designed the IBM 701, the first general purpose, mass-produced computer. He wrote the first symbolic assembler, which allowed programs to be written in short, readable commands rather than pure numbers or punch codes. BiblioV2017 Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, Illia Polosukhin (2017) Attention Is All You Need. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762v5 Quotes: "The dominant sequence transduction models are based on complex recurrent or convolutional neural networks in an encoder-decoder configuration. The best performing models also connect the encoder and decoder through an attention mechanism. We propose a new simple network architecture, the Transformer, based solely on attention mechanisms, dispensing with recurrence and convolutions entirely. Experiments on two machine translation tasks show these models to be superior in quality while being more parallelizable and requiring significantly less time to train. Our model achieves 28.4 BLEU on the WMT 2014 English-to-German translation task, improving over the existing best results, including ensembles by over 2 BLEU. On the WMT 2014 English-to-French translation task, our model establishes a new single-model state-of-the-art BLEU score of 41.8 after training for 3.5 days on eight GPUs, a small fraction of the training costs of the best models from the literature. We show that the Transformer generalizes well to other tasks by applying it successfully to English constituency parsing both with large and limited training data."; BiblioB2020 Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, Dario Amodei (2020) Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165v4 Quotes: "Recent work has demonstrated substantial gains on many NLP tasks and benchmarks by pre-training on a large corpus of text followed by fine-tuning on a specific task. While typically task-agnostic in architecture, this method still requires task-specific fine-tuning datasets of thousands or tens of thousands of examples. By contrast, humans can generally perform a new language task from only a few examples or from simple instructions - something which current NLP systems still largely struggle to do. Here we show that scaling up language models greatly improves task-agnostic, few-shot performance, sometimes even reaching competitiveness with prior state-of-the-art fine-tuning approaches. Specifically, we train GPT-3, an autoregressive language model with 175 billion parameters, 10x more than any previous non-sparse language model, and test its performance in the few-shot setting. For all tasks, GPT-3 is applied without any gradient updates or fine-tuning, with tasks and few-shot demonstrations specified purely via text interaction with the model. GPT-3 achieves strong performance on many NLP datasets, including translation, question-answering, and cloze tasks, as well as several tasks that require on-the-fly reasoning or domain adaptation, such as unscrambling words, using a novel word in a sentence, or performing 3-digit arithmetic. At the same time, we also identify some datasets where GPT-3's few-shot learning still struggles, as well as some datasets where GPT-3 faces methodological issues related to training on large web corpora. Finally, we find that GPT-3 can generate samples of news articles which human evaluators have difficulty distinguishing from articles written by humans. We discuss broader societal impacts of this finding and of GPT-3 in general."; BiblioB2022 Yuntao Bai, Saurav Kadavath, Sandipan Kundu, Amanda Askell, Jackson Kernion, Andy Jones, Anna Chen, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, Cameron McKinnon, Carol Chen, Catherine Olsson, Christopher Olah, Danny Hernandez, Dawn Drain, Deep Ganguli, Dustin Li, Eli Tran-Johnson, Ethan Perez, Jamie Kerr, Jared Mueller, Jeffrey Ladish, Joshua Landau, Kamal Ndousse, Kamile Lukosuite, Liane Lovitt, Michael Sellitto, Nelson Elhage, Nicholas Schiefer, Noemi Mercado, Nova DasSarma, Robert Lasenby, Robin Larson, Sam Ringer, Scott Johnston, Shauna Kravec, Sheer El Showk, Stanislav Fort, Tamera Lanham, Timothy Telleen-Lawton, Tom Conerly, Tom Henighan, Tristan Hume, Samuel R. Bowman, Zac Hatfield-Dodds, Ben Mann, Dario Amodei, Nicholas Joseph, Sam McCandlish, Tom Brown, Jared Kaplan (2022) Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073 Quotes: "As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase we sample from an initial model, then generate self-critiques and revisions, and then finetune the original model on revised responses. In the RL phase, we sample from the finetuned model, use a model to evaluate which of the two samples is better, and then train a preference model from this dataset of AI preferences. We then train with RL using the preference model as the reward signal, i.e. we use 'RL from AI Feedback' (RLAIF). As a result we are able to train a harmless but non-evasive AI assistant that engages with harmful queries by explaining its objections to them. Both the SL and RL methods can leverage chain-of-thought style reasoning to improve the human-judged performance and transparency of AI decision making. These methods make it possible to control AI behavior more precisely and with far fewer human labels.";
  • #50 URL: http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/history/dartmouth/dartmouth.html URL: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathaniel_Rochester_(computer_scientist) BiblioM1955 McCarthy J, Minsky ML, Rochester N, Shannon CE (1955) A proposal for a summer workshop on Artificial Intelligence. URL: http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/dartmouth/dartmouth.pdf Quotes: "We propose that a 2 month, 10 man study of artificial intelligence be carried out during the summer of 1956 at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New Hampshire. The study is to proceed on the basis of the conjecture that every aspect of learning or any other feature of intelligence can in principle be so precisely described that a machine can be made to simulate it. An attempt will be made to find how to make machines use language, form abstractions and concepts, solve kinds of problems now reserved for humans, and improve themselves. We think that a significant advance can be made in one or more of these problems if a carefully selected group of scientists work on it together for a summer. The following are some aspects of the artificial intelligence problem: (1) Automatic Computers, (2) How Can a Computer be Programmed to Use a Language, (3) Neuron Nets, (4) Theory of the Size of a Calculation, (5) Self_Improvement, (6) Abstraction, (7) Randomness and Creativity, (8) "; "Estimated Expenses 6 salaries of 1200 - $7200 2 salaries of 700 - 1400 8 traveling and rent expenses averaging - 2400 Secretarial and organizational expense - 850 Additional traveling expenses - 600 Contingencies - 550 Total - $13,500"; BiblioO2023 OpenAI (2023) GPT-4 Technical Report. Via_OpenAI_SM_JCS. URL: https://cdn.openai.com/papers/gpt-4.pdf Quotes: "Abstract - We report the development of GPT-4, a large-scale, multimodal model which can accept image and text inputs and produce text outputs. While less capable than humans in many real-world scenarios, GPT-4 exhibits human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, including passing a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers. GPT-4 is a Transformer- based model pre-trained to predict the next token in a document. The post-training alignment process results in improved performance on measures of factuality and adherence to desired behavior. A core component of this project was developing infrastructure and optimization methods that behave predictably across a wide range of scales. This allowed us to accurately predict some aspects of GPT-4’s performance based on models trained with no more than 1/1,000th the compute of GPT-4.";
  • #55 BiblioR2018 Rouse WB, Spohrer JC (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 8:1-2, 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/19488289.2018.1424059. URL: https://service-science.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Rouse-Spohrer-Automating-Versus-Augmenting-Intelligence-12-21-17-copy.pdf Quotes: "Abstract: This article addresses the prospects for automating intelligence versus augmenting human intelligence. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is summarized, including contemporary AI and the new capabilities now possible. Functional requirements to augment human intelligence are outlined. An overall architecture is presented for providing this functionality, including how it will make deep learning explainable to decision makers. Three case studies are addressed, including driverless cars, medical diagnosis, and insurance underwriting. Paths to transformation in these domains are discussed. Prospects for innovation are considered in terms of what we can now do, what we surely will be able to do soon, and what we are unlikely to ever be able to do."; BiblioS2017 Imagination Challenge: Quantify and graph cost of digital workers and GDP per employee USA from 1960-2080. Service-Science.Info Blog Post. URL: https://service-science.info/archives/4741 Quotes: "Imagination challenge: Consider quantifying and graphing the decreasing cost of digital workers due to Moore’s Law, and increasing GDP/Employees USA from 1960 to 2080 (projected). A narrow digital worker will cost about a million dollars by 2025, and require a petascale computational system. The same digital worker will cost about a thousand dollars by 2045, and about $1 by 2065."; If you are an entrepreneur or CEO you are excited about the drop in cost of digital workers, because that means GDP per employee will continue its exponential increase. Source: http://service-science.info/archives/4741
  • #56 To understand in part why this is so, take a look at the fastest super-computer in the world… IBM helped build it for Oakridge National Labs, and it can do 200 million billion instructiosn per second using 13 Megawatts of power.
  • #57 Compate that to the human brain which can by many estimates perform a billion billion instructions per second (5x more than Summit) on a mere 20 watts, over 100,000 times less power.
  • #58 URL: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/energy-consumption-to-dramatically-increase-because-of-ai-114541309.html
  • #59 BiblioE2023 (2023) Edelman N, Huang P (2023) AI Breaks the Bank. By Noah Edelman & Pete Huang October 10, 2023 in the Neuron Newsletter. URL: https://www.theneurondaily.com/p/ai-breaks-bank Quotes: "AI is really darn expensive … even if you’re a trillion-dollar empire. The reason is that AI models are super-duper complex calculators … that require super-duper powerful computers … that cost a lot of $$$ … which hurts everyone except Nvidia. “Using [AI] to summarize an email is like getting a Lamborghini to deliver a pizza.” WSJ"; BiblioT2023 Thompson AD (2023) AI + medicine - with Harvey Castro MD (GPT-4, Med-PaLM 2, Carbon Health, Ambience, 311 ChatGPT call). Via_Harvey_Castro. URL: https://youtu.be/jTmkiGjrgpA Quotes: "14,365 views Jul 5, 2023 The Memo: https://lifearchitect.ai/memo/ Annotated Med-Palm 2 paper: https://lifearchitect.ai/report-card/ Harvey: https://www.harveycastromd.info/ https://www.amazon.com/stores/Harvey-... https://www.linkedin.com/in/harveycas... https://twitter.com/harveycastromd https://www.instagram.com/harveycastr... 00:00 Start! 07:23 AI by age 12:17 The Gap 14:47 Models (ChatGPT, GPT-4, Med-PaLM 2) 23:26 Use cases including non-emergency calls 35:28 Medicine vs self-driving cars 46:56 Harvey's favorite AI use case 52:56 AI as a medical partner Dr Alan D. Thompson is a world expert in artificial intelligence (AI), specialising in the augmentation of human intelligence, and advancing the evolution of ‘integrated AI’. Alan’s applied AI research and visualisations are featured across major international media, including citations in the University of Oxford’s debate on AI Ethics in December 2021. https://lifearchitect.ai/ ";
  • #65 URL: http://fasterthan20.com/ URL: https://xkcd.com/1232/
  • #66 BiblioR2018 Rouse WB, Spohrer JC (2018) Automating versus augmenting intelligence. Journal of Enterprise Transformation, 8:1-2, 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/19488289.2018.1424059. URL: https://service-science.info/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Rouse-Spohrer-Automating-Versus-Augmenting-Intelligence-12-21-17-copy.pdf Quotes: "Abstract: This article addresses the prospects for automating intelligence versus augmenting human intelligence. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) is summarized, including contemporary AI and the new capabilities now possible. Functional requirements to augment human intelligence are outlined. An overall architecture is presented for providing this functionality, including how it will make deep learning explainable to decision makers. Three case studies are addressed, including driverless cars, medical diagnosis, and insurance underwriting. Paths to transformation in these domains are discussed. Prospects for innovation are considered in terms of what we can now do, what we surely will be able to do soon, and what we are unlikely to ever be able to do."; BiblioS2017 Imagination Challenge: Quantify and graph cost of digital workers and GDP per employee USA from 1960-2080. Service-Science.Info Blog Post. URL: https://service-science.info/archives/4741 Quotes: "Imagination challenge: Consider quantifying and graphing the decreasing cost of digital workers due to Moore’s Law, and increasing GDP/Employees USA from 1960 to 2080 (projected). A narrow digital worker will cost about a million dollars by 2025, and require a petascale computational system. The same digital worker will cost about a thousand dollars by 2045, and about $1 by 2065."; If you are an entrepreneur or CEO you are excited about the drop in cost of digital workers, because that means GDP per employee will continue its exponential increase. Source: http://service-science.info/archives/4741
  • #68 URL Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Knowledge-Rebuild-Civilization-Aftermath-Cataclysm-ebook/dp/B00DMCV5YS/ URL TED Talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CdTzsbqQyhY Citation: Dartnell L (2012) The Knowledge: How to Rebuild Civilization in the Aftermath of a Cataclysm. Westminster London: Penguin Books. Jim Spohrer Blogs: Grand Challenge: http://service-science.info/archives/2189 Re-readings: http://service-science.info/archives/4416