1. Status update on GM-VV Karl-Gustav Pettersson, FMV ConstantinosGiannoulis, DSV/FOI Swedish VV&A Competence network2011-05-06 FMV SMART-Lab

3. GM-VV Volume 1: Introduction and overview

4. Walkthrough the document

5. Rationale

6. Standardization status of GM-VV

7. Introduktion av SISO

8. SISO standardiseringsprocess

9. SISO Balloting-process

10. Pilot Case Study

11. Objectives

14. Define the required information and argumentation mechanisms allowing well-balanced and risk-informed arguments with various levels of formality for acceptance decision making,

17. The GM-VV Volume 2: Implementation Guide

18. The GM-VV Volume 3: Reference ManualThe GenericMethodology for Verification & Validation Is introduced and defined in Provides guidance on implementation and use of Provides technical and referentialbackground information for Learns the basics of GM-VV from the GM-VV Vol 1. Introduction and overview M&S/VVAOrganizations and Personnel GM-VV Vol 2. Implementation guide Apply GM-VV by using the GM-VV Vol 3. Reference Manual Obtain VV&A and relatedbackground information on and for usewithin GM-VV from the

19. GM-VV Rationale

20. GM-VV Vol. 1

22. (soon to be balloted)

23. The GM-VV Volume 2: Implementation Guide

24. (more comment rounds, then to be balloted)

25. The GM-VV Volume 3: Reference Manual

27. Non profit organization

28. Based in the US but open to the international community

29. About 1200 members (20% non US)

30. Three annual workshops, two in the US and one in Europe

31. Three ways to become a member

32. Annual fee ~$100

33. Participate in a conference ~$700

34. Member of a sponsoring organization or corporatehttp://www.sisostds.org ”SISO’s mission is to provide an open forum that promotes the interoperability and reuse of models and simulations through the exchange of ideas, the examination of technologies, and the development of standards.”

35. Standardization process Overview of the SISO standardization process Maturation of concept Sponsor Organization Study Group Standing Study Group Product Nomination Development of standard Product Development Group Balloted Standard Product Support Group

36. Standardization process Preliminary Ballot Group SISO Balloting process PDG vote to go to balloting Ballot Pool Membership rules Interme-diate Ballot Group Final drafted product to SAC for approval SISO Members Ballot Group Balance guidelines Other interested people SAC announce Ballot Product approval SAC announce Ballot Balloting Comment resolution

37. Ballot balancing rules Membership rules: Balance guidelines: Apply for membership and pay fee Committing to conduct thorough review and completing in required time Representation: Commercial, Government, Academic Interest: User, Developer, General Interest No representation should exceed 75% and each category >10% No organization >25% No interest >50%

38. The GM-VV: Pilot Case Study

39. Pilot Case Study Introduction Rationale Objectives Technology readiness level is 4 (Component and/or Breadboard Validated in Laboratory Environment Setting) Test the method in a real environment (improve, involve, strengthen) Correctness and utility of the document set* Practical applicability of GM-VV: knowledge & experience Educational material development (tutorials) Tools (evaluation, requirements)

40. Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof Rijkswaterstaat(2006-2008) aimed at: Immediate reduction of traffic jams by means of smart, innovative and practical approaches About 60 projects in 3 main categories: Projects aimed at reduction of regular and incidental traffic jams Projects tempting people to think and act differently

41. Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof Our Focus: Flashing lights off On site Why Flashing Lights Reduction of speed Not to draw attention to an accident Directive First vehicle (fend off car) lights ON Other cars (rescue workers) lights OFF Compliance in practice? Falls short of expectations

42. What are the effects of showing one or multiple flashing lights on: The safety of rescue workers on site, and Traffic flow Effect of light color (blue or amber / yellow)? Effect of time of day (daylight / evening)? Effect of position accident (own lane or other direction)? Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof

43. Introduction Pilot Case Study Scenario: FileProof Approach Deliverables 5 workshops, 4 nations (FR, NL, DE, SE) Focus on Technical Processes & Products Spiral Development (iterative & incremental) White Paper Authoritative & Educational Illustration Benefits, Limitations & Improvements Introductory Tutorial Presentation Dissemination for M&S Community Illustration & Guidance Application

44. The Case Study The content of the document has a steep learning curve with a high entry level Wording is long, fuzzy, vague and pressumes a lot Misleading titles creating false expectations No leading document driving the reader Weak cross-document proof reading There is no document that specifies THE methodology Bits & bytes scattered among the 3 documents HB perspective not clearly communicated Multiple objectives set Overlapping information & inconsistencies Incompatible to SISO product nomination More cases Pilot Case Study Scenario: Findings

45. Status Update on GM-VV Tack!Frågor?