First workshop of the REFIT project (refitproject.com) - Bibracte, March 2016 Exploring integrated approaches to cultural landscapes Current strategies, problems and potential Iron Age oppida as a case study

1. Exploring
integrated
approaches
to
cultural
landscapes
Current
strategies,
problems
and
poten7al
–
iron
age
oppida
as
a
case
study
–
Cultural
landscapes
in
the
making
:
Proposal
for
a
collabora8v
research
Caroline
Darroux,
Karine
Basset,
Mélanie
Duval,
Véronique
Peyrache-­‐Gadeau,
Mari
Oiry-­‐Varacca
,
This
work
has
been
supported
by
the
LABEX
ITEM
ANR-­‐10-­‐LABX-­‐50-­‐01
“InvesBssements
d’avenir”

2. Introduction
• Cultural
landscape,
a
new
concept
connected
with
territorial
labelling
issues
• PerspecBves
:
– To
develop
a
global
approach
of
the
heritage
process
– To
focus
on
the
landscape
construcBon
dynamics
as
an
heritage
object
• Aims
of
this
workshop
and
our
communicaBon:
what
is
behind
this
cultural
landscape
heritage
process
?
Based
on
which
landscape
ideas?
In
order
to
serve
which
kind
of
interests?
Which
are
the
stakes
and
the
main
stakeholders
involved
in
these
dynamics
?

3. Presentation
• The
Research
program
«
CriBcal
approaches
of
the
processes
of
labelling
in
territorial
project
»
(Labex
Item
–
research
network
on
the
mountain
territories)
• MulBdisciplinary
team
of
researchers
(geography,
history,
anthropology,
territorial
economy,
urbanism,
sociology)
• Different
fieldworks
in
mountains
areas
(Alpine
Protected
areas,
Mediterranean
mountains,
and
the
Massif
Central)
• Differents
partnerships
in
these
fiedlworks
in
parBcular
with
EPCC
Bibracte
and
the
PNR
Morvan

4. Perspectives of the Research Program
• To
understand
the
social
process
of
territorial
disBnctnes
through
places
and
landscapes
• To
analyze
the
rising
tensions
between
:
– quest
of
uniqueness
and
normalizing
procedure
– protecBon
and
development
– cultural
heritage
and
natural
environment
• To
analyze
and
experiment
with
the
co-­‐producBon
of
sciences
and
knowledges
in
the
context
of
territorial
projects

5. Triple
choice
which
was
made:
-­‐
Monumental
versus
landscaped
approach
-­‐
Cultural
versus
mixed
World
Heritage
site
-­‐
Cave
versus
serial
property
Case
study
in
France,
Chauvet
Cave
World
Heritage
Inscrip9on
Process
:
A
monumental
approach
versus
a
landscaped
approach
Property
finally
inscribed
on
the
World
Heritage
list
:
cave
perimeter
as
a
core
zone
(red
circle),
with
the
protected
area
“Pont
d’
Arc”
as
a
buffer
zone
(orange
circle)
;
will
and
wish
to
limit
the
conflicts
between
the
various
stakeholders
involved
in
the
management
of
this
heritage
and
tourist
area.

6. -­‐ In
a
marginalized
area:
reflecBons
on
a
future
recogniBon
of
agropastoralism
as
a
cultural
landscape
-­‐ Making
Landscape
the
heart
of
a
territorial
project
Ø Difficult
to
work
all
together
for
a
collecBve
project
Case
study
in
Moroccan
High-­‐Atlas
:
Aït
Bouguemez
valley
M.
Oiry
and
S.
Jaillet
2013
Recognize
the
very
singular
link
between
the
local
human
community
and
her
environment,
from
the
bofom
of
the
valley
to
the
high
mountain
pastures.
M.
Oiry
2011

7. Shared vision for
a landscape project
-­‐workshops
with
Pnr
Morvan
and
EPCC
Bibracte
technicians:
what
sort
of
land
do
you
care?
-­‐farmers,
individual
and
collecBve
meeBng:
what
about
landscape
in
your
daily
labor?
-­‐«
EntreBens
de
Bibracte
»:
public
discussion
about
landscape
-­‐study
trip
in
Bruche
Valley
ScienBfic
support
of
ITEM:
-­‐to
complicate
noBon
of
«
local
»
-­‐ParBcipaBon
in
concentric
circles

8. Collaborative research method to analyse distincnes
process facilitating communities engagement in
Mont Beuvray
-­‐co-­‐producBon
of
sciences
and
knowledges:
pragmaBc
anthropology
protocol,
restoring
research
to
stakeholders,
make
allowance
for
local
knowledges
and
pracBces
in
landscape
project.
-­‐coordinated
invesBgaBons
(landscape
diagnosBcs,
doctoral
thesis,
post-­‐doctoral
research)

9. Thank
you
for
your
afenBon