HathiTrust is a shared digital repository launched in 2008 that aims to build the universal library. It is a partnership of over 70 universities working together to collect, preserve, and provide access to digitized books and journals. The repository contains over 10 million volumes, with 72% being public domain works and 28% under various access restrictions. HathiTrust provides cost-effective long-term preservation of these digitized materials while also facilitating access through its discovery interface and full-text search capabilities.
Ciudad De San Jose, Sta. Rosa City, Laguna
Prime Properties of P.A. Alvarez Devt Corp
Price ranging from 1.8m-3.1m
Near facilities and public amenities!!
Ciudad De San Jose, Sta. Rosa City, Laguna
Prime Properties of P.A. Alvarez Devt Corp
Price ranging from 1.8m-3.1m
Near facilities and public amenities!!
Joanna Motion heeft aan de wieg gestaan van de succesvolle implementatie van alumnirelaties en fondsenwerving door universiteiten in Groot Brittannië. Ze geeft al jarenlang leiding aan de Europese tak van CASE, the Council for Advancement and Support of Education. Ze is een zeer begenadigd spreker en vanuit haar internationale ervaring als geen ander in staat de huidige interesse in alumnirelaties in Nederland, in een globale context te plaatsen.
"Joanna Motion was appointed the inaugural vice president of CASE international operations in 2003 after serving as executive director of CASE Europe since 2000. In her current role, she has overseen the growth of CASE’s activities outside North America, including the creation of CASE Asia-Pacific. She has played a key role in encouraging government support for educational advancement in the United Kingdom and on the continent and in securing grant support for programming in East and West Africa. She serves as liaison to the CASE Europe board and to the CASE board’s International Committee. Prior to joining CASE, Joanna held a full range of advancement positions at four universities and served as a CASE volunteer. She was director of development and alumni relations and director of communications and development for the University of Kent at Canterbury in the U.K. and headed the alumni and development unit at the University of Melbourne in Australia. She also worked in admissions, public relations, and communications for the University of East Anglia and the University of Hull in the UK. Joanna is a frequent conference speaker and workshop leader around the world and has been recognized with the CASE Crystal Apple Award for outstanding teaching at CASE conferences. She holds a degree in English language and literature from Oxford University."
Public libraries pulling rank - statistics on the policy maker's agendaKristīne Pabērza
Presentation on the results from the study "Public libraries: value, trust & satisfaction" showed at the IFLA 2009 sattelite meeting "Libraries Plus: Adding value in the cultural community: the 8th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services" in Florence, August 17-20
Aaron Smith will share the Pew Internet Project’s most recent data on the constantly shifting digital ecosystem in the U.S. and highlight some major trends that have emerged since the project’s inception in 1999.
RDAP13 DPN Keynote Presentation by Steve MoralesASIS&T
Steven Morales, Executive Director, Digital Preservation Network (DPN)
Opening Talk of Research Data Access & Preservation Summit 2013.
The Digital Preservation Network: Building the Curation Network for Higher Education
Abstract: The Digital Preservation Network (DPN) will address risk to the very long-term preservation of the scholarly record by creating a federated approach to preservation of academic content. In this talk by DPN Executive Director, Steven Morales, he will discuss the latest developments in the DPN architecture as well as the proposed DPN services to ensure reliable, long-term digital preservation through a federated network of diverse, non-overlapping preservation strategies sustained by committed institutions of higher education. The DPN through cross-institutional collaboration of more than 50 institutions of higher education seeks to mitigate the threat of a single point of failure — organizational, technical, physical, or political — jeopardizing centuries of scholarship. This presentation will discuss progress toward the first technical implementation of DPN and opportunities to engage in the effort.
A presentation to the San Jose State University Library faculty and staff about the Open.Michigan initiative and how it ties into supporting access to low/no cost resources in the classroom and focuses on participation in education.
Integrating Social Media with Civic Engagement (Bonner Foundation & CIRCLE)Bonner Foundation
This presentation—Integrating Social Media Into Community Partnerships and Institutsion—was given at the 2011 IARSLCE Conference in Chicago, IL. Presenters Ariane Hoy (Bonner Foundation) and Abby Kiesa (CIRCLE) described how the national network of campus programs have experimented with using social media to broaden and deepen civic engagement. In addition, learning and results from three year's of research and assessment—which sought to explore the impact on students, campuses, and partners—was provided. For info, contact ahoy@bonner.org and akiesa@circle.edu.
This session will demystify (generative) AI by exploring its workings as an advanced statistical modelling tool (suitable for any level of technical knowledge). Not only will this session explain the technological underpinnings of AI, it will also address concerns and (long-term) requirements around ethical and practical usage of AI. This includes data preparation and cleaning, data ownership, and the value of data-generated - but not owned - by libraries. It will also discuss the potentials for (hypothetical) use cases of AI in collections environments and making collections data AI-ready; providing examples of AI capabilities and applications beyond chatbots.
CATH DISHMAN, CENYU SHEN,
KATHERINE STEPHAN
Although scholarly communications has become more open, problems with predatory and problematic publishers remain. There are commercial providers of lists, start-up/renegade Internet lists of good/bad and the researchers, publishers and assessors that try to understand and process what being on/off a list means to themselves, their careers and their institutions. Still, these problems persist and leaves many asking: where is the list?
Christina Dinh Nguyen, University of Toronto Mississauga Library
In the world of digital literacies, liaison and instructional librarians are increasingly coming to terms with a new term: algorithmic literacy. No matter the liaison or instruction subjects – computer science, sociology, language and literature, chemistry, physics, economics, or other – students are grappling with assignments that demand a critical understanding, or even use, of algorithms. Over the course of this session, we’ll discuss the term ‘algorithmic literacies,’ explore how it fits into other digital literacies, and see why it as a curriculum might belong at your library. We’ll also look at some examples of practical pedagogical methods you can implement right away, depending on what types of AL lessons you want to teach, and who your patrons are. Lastly, we’ll discuss how librarians should view themselves as co-learners when working with AL skills. This session seeks to bring together participants from across the different libraries, with diverse missions/vision/mandates, to explore ways we can all benefit from teaching AL. If time permits, we may discuss how text and data librarians (functional specialists) can support the development of this curriculum.
David Pride, The Open University
In this paper, we present CORE-GPT, a novel question- answering platform that combines GPT-based language models and more than 32 million full-text open access scientific articles from CORE. We first demonstrate that GPT3.5 and GPT4 cannot be relied upon to provide references or citations for generated text. We then introduce CORE-GPT which delivers evidence-based answers to questions, along with citations and links to the cited papers, greatly increasing the trustworthiness of the answers and reducing the risk of hallucinations.
Cath Dishman, Cenyu Shen, Katherine Stephan
Although scholarly communications has become more open, problems with predatory and problematic publishers remain. There are commercial providers of lists, start-up/renegade Internet lists of good/bad and the researchers, publishers and assessors that try to understand and process what being on/off a list means to themselves, their careers and their institutions. Still, these problems persist and leaves many asking: where is the list?
This plenary panel will discuss the problems of “predatory” publishing and what, if anything, publishers, our community and researchers can do to try and help minimise their abundancy/impact.
eth Montague-Hellen, Francis Crick Institute, Katie Fraser, University of Nottingham
Open Access is a foundational topic in Scholarly Communications. However, when information professionals and publishers talk about its future, it is nearly always Gold open access we discuss. Green was seen as the big solution for providing access to those who couldn’t afford it. However, publishers have protested that Green destroys their business models. How true is this, and are we even all talking the same language when we talk about Green?
Chris Banks, Imperial College London, Caren Milloy, Jisc,
Transitional agreements were developed in response to funder policy and institutional demand to constrain costs and facilitate funder compliance. They have since become the dominant model by which UK research outputs are made open access. In January 2023, Jisc instigated a critical review of TAs and the OA landscape to provide an evidence base to inform a conversation on the desired future state of research dissemination. This session will discuss the key findings of the review and its impact on a sector-wide consultation and concrete actions in the UK and beyond.
Michael Levine-Clark, University of Denver, Jason Price, SCELC Library Consortium
As transformative agreements emerge as a new standard, it is critical for libraries, consortia, publishers, and vendors to have consistent and comprehensive data – yet data around publication profiles, authorship, and readership has been shown to be highly variable in availability and accuracy. Building on prior research around frameworks for assessing the combined value of open publishing and comprehensive read access that these deals provide, we will address multi-dimensional perspectives to the challenges that the industry faces with the dissemination, collection, and analysis of data about authorship, readership, and value.
Joanna Motion heeft aan de wieg gestaan van de succesvolle implementatie van alumnirelaties en fondsenwerving door universiteiten in Groot Brittannië. Ze geeft al jarenlang leiding aan de Europese tak van CASE, the Council for Advancement and Support of Education. Ze is een zeer begenadigd spreker en vanuit haar internationale ervaring als geen ander in staat de huidige interesse in alumnirelaties in Nederland, in een globale context te plaatsen.
"Joanna Motion was appointed the inaugural vice president of CASE international operations in 2003 after serving as executive director of CASE Europe since 2000. In her current role, she has overseen the growth of CASE’s activities outside North America, including the creation of CASE Asia-Pacific. She has played a key role in encouraging government support for educational advancement in the United Kingdom and on the continent and in securing grant support for programming in East and West Africa. She serves as liaison to the CASE Europe board and to the CASE board’s International Committee. Prior to joining CASE, Joanna held a full range of advancement positions at four universities and served as a CASE volunteer. She was director of development and alumni relations and director of communications and development for the University of Kent at Canterbury in the U.K. and headed the alumni and development unit at the University of Melbourne in Australia. She also worked in admissions, public relations, and communications for the University of East Anglia and the University of Hull in the UK. Joanna is a frequent conference speaker and workshop leader around the world and has been recognized with the CASE Crystal Apple Award for outstanding teaching at CASE conferences. She holds a degree in English language and literature from Oxford University."
Public libraries pulling rank - statistics on the policy maker's agendaKristīne Pabērza
Presentation on the results from the study "Public libraries: value, trust & satisfaction" showed at the IFLA 2009 sattelite meeting "Libraries Plus: Adding value in the cultural community: the 8th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services" in Florence, August 17-20
Aaron Smith will share the Pew Internet Project’s most recent data on the constantly shifting digital ecosystem in the U.S. and highlight some major trends that have emerged since the project’s inception in 1999.
RDAP13 DPN Keynote Presentation by Steve MoralesASIS&T
Steven Morales, Executive Director, Digital Preservation Network (DPN)
Opening Talk of Research Data Access & Preservation Summit 2013.
The Digital Preservation Network: Building the Curation Network for Higher Education
Abstract: The Digital Preservation Network (DPN) will address risk to the very long-term preservation of the scholarly record by creating a federated approach to preservation of academic content. In this talk by DPN Executive Director, Steven Morales, he will discuss the latest developments in the DPN architecture as well as the proposed DPN services to ensure reliable, long-term digital preservation through a federated network of diverse, non-overlapping preservation strategies sustained by committed institutions of higher education. The DPN through cross-institutional collaboration of more than 50 institutions of higher education seeks to mitigate the threat of a single point of failure — organizational, technical, physical, or political — jeopardizing centuries of scholarship. This presentation will discuss progress toward the first technical implementation of DPN and opportunities to engage in the effort.
A presentation to the San Jose State University Library faculty and staff about the Open.Michigan initiative and how it ties into supporting access to low/no cost resources in the classroom and focuses on participation in education.
Integrating Social Media with Civic Engagement (Bonner Foundation & CIRCLE)Bonner Foundation
This presentation—Integrating Social Media Into Community Partnerships and Institutsion—was given at the 2011 IARSLCE Conference in Chicago, IL. Presenters Ariane Hoy (Bonner Foundation) and Abby Kiesa (CIRCLE) described how the national network of campus programs have experimented with using social media to broaden and deepen civic engagement. In addition, learning and results from three year's of research and assessment—which sought to explore the impact on students, campuses, and partners—was provided. For info, contact ahoy@bonner.org and akiesa@circle.edu.
This session will demystify (generative) AI by exploring its workings as an advanced statistical modelling tool (suitable for any level of technical knowledge). Not only will this session explain the technological underpinnings of AI, it will also address concerns and (long-term) requirements around ethical and practical usage of AI. This includes data preparation and cleaning, data ownership, and the value of data-generated - but not owned - by libraries. It will also discuss the potentials for (hypothetical) use cases of AI in collections environments and making collections data AI-ready; providing examples of AI capabilities and applications beyond chatbots.
CATH DISHMAN, CENYU SHEN,
KATHERINE STEPHAN
Although scholarly communications has become more open, problems with predatory and problematic publishers remain. There are commercial providers of lists, start-up/renegade Internet lists of good/bad and the researchers, publishers and assessors that try to understand and process what being on/off a list means to themselves, their careers and their institutions. Still, these problems persist and leaves many asking: where is the list?
Christina Dinh Nguyen, University of Toronto Mississauga Library
In the world of digital literacies, liaison and instructional librarians are increasingly coming to terms with a new term: algorithmic literacy. No matter the liaison or instruction subjects – computer science, sociology, language and literature, chemistry, physics, economics, or other – students are grappling with assignments that demand a critical understanding, or even use, of algorithms. Over the course of this session, we’ll discuss the term ‘algorithmic literacies,’ explore how it fits into other digital literacies, and see why it as a curriculum might belong at your library. We’ll also look at some examples of practical pedagogical methods you can implement right away, depending on what types of AL lessons you want to teach, and who your patrons are. Lastly, we’ll discuss how librarians should view themselves as co-learners when working with AL skills. This session seeks to bring together participants from across the different libraries, with diverse missions/vision/mandates, to explore ways we can all benefit from teaching AL. If time permits, we may discuss how text and data librarians (functional specialists) can support the development of this curriculum.
David Pride, The Open University
In this paper, we present CORE-GPT, a novel question- answering platform that combines GPT-based language models and more than 32 million full-text open access scientific articles from CORE. We first demonstrate that GPT3.5 and GPT4 cannot be relied upon to provide references or citations for generated text. We then introduce CORE-GPT which delivers evidence-based answers to questions, along with citations and links to the cited papers, greatly increasing the trustworthiness of the answers and reducing the risk of hallucinations.
Cath Dishman, Cenyu Shen, Katherine Stephan
Although scholarly communications has become more open, problems with predatory and problematic publishers remain. There are commercial providers of lists, start-up/renegade Internet lists of good/bad and the researchers, publishers and assessors that try to understand and process what being on/off a list means to themselves, their careers and their institutions. Still, these problems persist and leaves many asking: where is the list?
This plenary panel will discuss the problems of “predatory” publishing and what, if anything, publishers, our community and researchers can do to try and help minimise their abundancy/impact.
eth Montague-Hellen, Francis Crick Institute, Katie Fraser, University of Nottingham
Open Access is a foundational topic in Scholarly Communications. However, when information professionals and publishers talk about its future, it is nearly always Gold open access we discuss. Green was seen as the big solution for providing access to those who couldn’t afford it. However, publishers have protested that Green destroys their business models. How true is this, and are we even all talking the same language when we talk about Green?
Chris Banks, Imperial College London, Caren Milloy, Jisc,
Transitional agreements were developed in response to funder policy and institutional demand to constrain costs and facilitate funder compliance. They have since become the dominant model by which UK research outputs are made open access. In January 2023, Jisc instigated a critical review of TAs and the OA landscape to provide an evidence base to inform a conversation on the desired future state of research dissemination. This session will discuss the key findings of the review and its impact on a sector-wide consultation and concrete actions in the UK and beyond.
Michael Levine-Clark, University of Denver, Jason Price, SCELC Library Consortium
As transformative agreements emerge as a new standard, it is critical for libraries, consortia, publishers, and vendors to have consistent and comprehensive data – yet data around publication profiles, authorship, and readership has been shown to be highly variable in availability and accuracy. Building on prior research around frameworks for assessing the combined value of open publishing and comprehensive read access that these deals provide, we will address multi-dimensional perspectives to the challenges that the industry faces with the dissemination, collection, and analysis of data about authorship, readership, and value.
Hylke Koers, STM Solutions
Get Full Text Research (GetFTR) launched in 2020 with the objective of streamlining discovery and access of scholarly content in the many tools that researchers use today, such as Dimensions, Semantic Scholar, Mendeley, and many others. It works equally well for open access content as it does for subscription-based content, providing researchers with recognizable buttons and indicators to get them to the most up-to-date version of content with minimal effort. Currently, around 30,000 OA articles are accessed every day via GetFTR links.
Gareth Cole, Loughborough University, Adrian Clark, Figshare
Researchers face more pressure to share their research data than ever before. Owing to a rise in funder policies and momentum towards more openness across the research landscape. Although policies for data sharing are in place, engagement work is undertaken by librarians in order to ensure repository uptake and compliance.
We will discuss a particular strategy implemented at Loughborough University that involved the application of conceptual messaging frameworks to engagement activities in order to promote and encourage use of our Figshare-powered repository. We will showcase the rationale behind the adoption of messaging frameworks for library outreach and some practical examples.
Mark Lester, Cardiff Metropolitan University
This talk will outline how a completely accidental occurrence led to brand new avenues for open research advocacy and reasons for being. This advocacy has occurred within student communities such as trainee teachers, student psychologists and (especially) those soon losing access to subscription-based library content. Alongside these new forms of advocacy, these ethical example of AI use cases has begun to form a cornerstone of directly connecting the work of the library to new technology.
Simon Bell, Bristol University Press
The UN SDG Publishers Compact, launched in 2020, was set up to inspire action among publishers to accelerate progress to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030, asking signatories to develop sustainable practices, act as champions and publish books and journals that will “inform, develop and inspire action in that direction”.
This Lightning Talk will discuss how our new Bristol University Press Digital has been developed as part of our mission to contribute a meaningful and impactful response to this call to action as well as the global social challenges we face.
Using thematic tagging to create uniquely curated themed eBook collections around the Global Social Challenges, Bristol University Press Digital responds directly to the need to provide the scholarly community access to a comprehensive range SDG focussed content while minimising time and resource at the institution end in collating content and maintaining collection relevance to rapidly evolving themes
Jenni Adams, University of Sheffield, Ric Campbell, University of Sheffield
Academic researchers are becoming increasingly aware of the need to make data and software FAIR in order to support the sharing and reuse of non-publication outputs. Currently there is still a lack of concise and practical guidance on how to achieve this in the context of specific data types and disciplines.
This presentation details recent and ongoing work at the University of Sheffield to bridge this gap. It will explore the development of a FAIR resource with specialist guidance for a range of data types and will examine the planned development of this project during the period 2023-25
TASHA MELLINS-COHEN
COUNTER & Mellins-Cohen Consulting, JOANNA BALL
DOAJ, YVONNE CAMPFENS
OA Switchboard,
ADAM DER, Max Planck Digital Library
Community-led organizations like DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), COUNTER (the standard for usage metrics) and OA Switchboard (information exchange for OA publications) are committed to providing reliable, not-for-profit services and standards essential for a well-functioning global research ecosystem. These organizations operate behind the scenes, with low budgets and limited staffing – no salespeople, marketing teams, travel budgets, or in-house technology support. They collaborate with one another and with bigger infrastructure bodies like Crossref and ORCID, creating the foundations on which much scholarly infrastructure relies.
These organizations deliver value through open infrastructure, data and standards, and naturally services and tools have been built by commercial and not-for-profit groups that capitalize on their open, interoperable data and services – many of which you are likely to recognize and may use on a regular basis.
Hear from the Directors of COUNTER, DOAJ and OA Switchboard, as well as a library leader, on the role of these organizations, the challenges they face and why support from the community is essential to their sustainability.
CAMILLE LEMIEUX
Springer Nature
What is the current state of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the scholarly publishing community? It's time to take a thorough look at the 2023 global Workplace Equity (WE) Survey results. The C4DISC coalition conducted the WE Survey to capture perceptions, experiences, and demographics of colleagues working at publishers, associations, libraries, and many more types of organizations in the global community. Four key themes emerged from the 2023 results, which will be compared to the findings from the first WE Survey conducted in 2018. Recommendations for actions organisations can consider within their contexts will be proposed and discussed.
Rob Johnson, Research Consulting
Angela Cochran, American Society of Clinical Oncology
Gaynor Redvers-Mutton, Biochemical Society
Since 2015, the number of self-published learned societies in the UK has decreased by over a third, with the remaining societies experiencing real-term revenue declines. All around the world, society publishers are struggling with increased competition from commercial publishers and the rise of open access business models that reward quantity over quality. We will delve into the distinctive position of societies in research, examine the challenges confronting UK and US learned society publishers, and explore actionable steps for libraries and policymakers to support the continued relevance of learned society publishers in the evolving scholarly landscape.
Simon Bell, Clare Hooper, Katharine Horton, Ian Morgan
Over the last few years we have witnessed a seismic shift in the scholarly ecosystem. Three years since outset of the COVID pandemic and the establishment UN Publishers Compact, this is discussion-led presentation will look at how four UK Universities Presses have adopted a consultative and collaborative approach on projects to support their institutional missions, engage with the wider scholarly community while building on a commitment to make a meaningful difference to society.
This panel discussion will combine the perspectives of four UK based university presses, all with distinct identities and varied publishing programs drawn from humanities, arts and social sciences, yet with a shared recognition and value of the importance to collaborate and co-operate on a shared vision to support accessibility and inclusivity within the wider scholarly community and maintain a rich bibliodiversity.
While research support teams are generally small and specialist in nature, an increased demand of its service has been observed across the sector. This is particularly true for teaching-intensive institutions. As a pilot to expand research support across ARU library, the library graduate trainee was seconded to the research services team for a month. This dialogue between the former trainee and manager will discuss what the experience and outcomes of the secondment were from different perspectives. The conversation will also explore the exposure Library and Information Studies students have to research services throughout their degree.
TIM FELLOWS & EMILY WILD, Jisc
Octopus.ac is a UKRI funded research publishing model, designed to promote best practice. Intended to sit alongside journals, Octopus provides a space for researcher collaboration, recording work in detail, and receiving feedback from others, allowing journals to focus on narrative.
The platform removes existing barriers to publishing. It’s an entirely free, open space for researchers, without editorial and pre-publication peer review processes. The only requirement for authors is a valid ORCiD ID. Without barriers, Octopus must provide feedback mechanisms to ensure the community can self-moderate. During this session, we’ll explore Octopus’ aims to foster a collaborative environment and incentivise quality.
David Parker, Publisher and Founder, Lived Places Publishing
Dr. Kadian Pow, Lecturer in Sociology and Black Studies & LPP Author, Birmingham City University
Natasha Edmonds, Director, Publisher and Industry Strategy, Clarivate
Library patrons want to search for and locate authors by particular identity markers, such as gender identification, country of origin, sexual orientation, nature of disability, and the many intersectional points that allow an author to express a point-of-view. Artificial Intelligence, skilled web researchers, and data scientists in general struggle to achieve accuracy on single identity markers, such as gender. And what right does anybody have to affix identity metadata to an author other than the author theirselves? And what of the risks in disseminating author identity metadata in electronic distribution platforms and in library catalog systems? Can a "fully informed" author even imagine all the possible misuses of their identity metadata?
More from UKSG: connecting the knowledge community (20)
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
1. HATHITRUST
A Shared Digital Repository
HathiTrust: Aspiring to Build
the Universal Library
UKSG Annual Conference
March 26-28, 2012
Jeremy York, Project Librarian, HathiTrust
2. Partnership
Arizona State University North Carolina State University of Connecticut
Baylor University University University of Florida
Boston College Northwestern University University of Illinois
Boston University The Ohio State University University of Illinois at Chicago
California Digital Library The Pennsylvania State The University of Iowa
Columbia University University
Princeton University University of Maryland
Cornell University
Purdue University University of Miami
Dartmouth College
Duke University Stanford University University of Michigan
Emory University Texas A&M University University of Minnesota
Florida State University Universidad Complutense University of Missouri
Getty Research Institute de Madrid University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Harvard University Library University of Arizona The University of North
Indiana University University of Calgary Carolina at Chapel Hill
Johns Hopkins University University of California University of Notre Dame
Lafayette College Berkeley
Davis University of Pennsylvania
Library of Congress
Irvine University of Pittsburgh
Massachusetts Institute of
Technology Los Angeles University of Utah
McGill University` Merced University of Virginia
Michigan State University Riverside University of Washington
New York Public Library San Diego University of Wisconsin-
New York University San Francisco Madison
North Carolina Central Santa Barbara Utah State University
University Santa Cruz
Washington University
The University of Chicago
Yale University Library
3. Digital Repository
• Launched 2008
• Initial focus on digitized book and journal
content
– 10,109,919 total volumes
– 5,372,755 book titles
– 266,540 serial titles
– 2,802,347 public domain (~28%)
4. The Name
• The meaning behind the name
– Hathi (hah-tee)--Hindi for elephant
– Big, strong
– Never forgets, wise
– Secure
– Trustworthy
5. Mission
• To contribute to the common good by collecting,
organizing, preserving, communicating, and
sharing the record of human knowledge
6. HathiTrust
Universal Library
Common Goal
Single Entity, Many Partners
7. Collections and Collaboration
• Comprehensive collection
- Preservation…with Access
• Shared strategies
– Copyright
– Collection management, development
– Preservation
– Discovery / Use
– Bibliographic Indeterminacy
– Efficient user services
• Public Good
8. Content Distribution
U.S. Federal
Government
Documents
(worldwide)
4%
Public
Domain
72% "Public Domain" Public Domain (US)
28% (worldwide) 10%
14%
Open Access
.1%
Creative Commons
.01%
9. Content Sources
LC Minnesota
1% 1%
Yale UNC-Chapel Hill
Harvard Madrid 0%
Virginia 0% Utah State
Indiana 1% 1%
0% 0% Chicago
2% NCSU 0%
Columbia NorthwesternDuke
1% 0% 0%
Princeton 0% Illinois
Purdue Penn State
3% 0%
NYPL 0% 0%
Cornell 3%
Wisconsin 4%
5% Michigan
45%
California
33%
12. Language Distribution (1)
The top 10 languages make up
Remaining ~86% of all content
Languages
Arabic Latin 14%
Italian 2% 1%
3% Japanese
3% English
Russian 48%
4%
Chinese
German
4%
9%
Spanish
5%
French
7%
13. Language Distribution (2)
Bulgarian ArmenianAncient-Greek
Panjabi Catalan Malayalam
1% 1%
1% 1% 1% 1%
Multiple The next 40
Sanskrit 1%
2% Ukrainian Serbian Marathi Malay Undetermined
languages make
1% 1%Romanian Telugu 1%
1% Finnish 7% up ~13% of total
Slovak
Vietnamese Greek 1% 1% 1%1% Polish
Hungarian 1% 7%
1%
2% Portuguese
Norwegian Dutch 7%
2% 5%
Music
2%
Bengali Tamil
2% Hebrew
2%
5%
Persian Hindi
2% 5%
Unknown Czech
Indonesian
3% 3% Thai Korean
Turkish Urdu 4%
Danish 3% Swedish 4%
Croatian 3% 3%
3% 3%
2%
14. Preservation with Access
• Cost effective preservation and access services
• Preservation
– TRAC-certified
– Robust infrastructure
– Long-term commitments on digital content
facilitate planning, decision-making
15. Executive Committee
Strategic Advisory Board
Budget/Finances Decision-making
Guidance on Policy, Planning
Collective Work: Working
Groups and Committees
Operational
Operational Strategic
•• Communications
Communications • Collections
•• User Support
User Support • Discovery Interface
•• User Experience
User Experience • Full-text Search
Distributed work
• Driven by needs of institutions
• Leverage across the partnership
• Projects, Grant Work, Ingest
Specifications, PageTurner, Bibliographic Data Management
HathiTrust
16. Bibliographic
Enterprise Repository Repository Rights Collection
Governance Data
Management Administration Administration Management Development
Management
Communication Data management Digital
Budget, Finances Hardware Copyright Entity description
and Coordination (content • Expansion beyond
configuration and determination (record-level)
with partner storage, backup, in books and journals
institutions maintenance (born-
Decision-making tegrity digital, images and
checks, deletion) Object maps, audio)
Project Copyright review identification • Selection of
Policy management Web and (item-level) content (for non-
application server Google volume
configuration and Hardware selection ingest and pilots
Copyright projects)
maintenance and replacement information Data availability
Planning
management Print
(database) • Cloud Library (effect
Security of digital on print)
Content and
Metadata
specifications Rightsholder
permissions
Permissions
Disaster Recovery
Logging
Processes for
ensuring content
integrity
Quality
e-Commerce Content Ingest Content Access User Services Outreach Legal
Assurance
Transformation PageTurner Quality Review Risk management
Print on Demand Usability Project website (use of materials)
Validation Collection Builder Content User support Partner
Certification Monthly agreements
(helpdesk)
newsletter
Large-scale Search Advocacy
Papers and
Financial presentations
contributions Research Center
HathiTrust Functional Communication
of partners
Bibliographic
Framework with potential
partners
Catalog
Surveys, general
APIs inquiries
Repository
evaluation and
audit
(e.g., DRAMBORA,
TRAC)
17. Constitutional Convention
• October 2011
• 52 partners
• 3-year review overseen by SAB
• Ballot Proposals
– Print monograph storage
– Approval Process for development initiatives
– U.S. Government Documents
– Fee-for-service content deposit
– Governance
18. Emerging Governance
• 12-member Board of Governors
– 3-member Executive Committee
– Executive Director
• 6 seats to founding institutions
– 2 California, 2 CIC (minus Indiana and Michigan)
– 1 Indiana, 1 Michigan
• Voting (March 1 – March 15)
• Announcement of Results March 30
• Begin work April 16, 2012
19. Preservation with Access
• Cost effective preservation and access services
• Preservation
– TRAC-certified
– Robust infrastructure
– Long-term commitments on digital content
facilitate planning, decision-making
20. Preservation with Access (2)
• Discovery
– Bibliographic and full-text search of all materials
– Extended discovery (ProQuest, EBSCO, OCLC, Ex
Libris)
– Mechanisms for local loading of records
21.
22.
23.
24. Preservation with Access (3)
• Access and Use
– Public domain and open access works
– Full download of materials where possible*
– Print on demand
– Collections and APIs
– Research Center*
– Lawful uses of in-copyright works*
25. Lawful uses
• Access to users who have print disabilities
• Section 108 uses of materials
• Access to orphan works
26. Terms of Access
• Available to students, faculty, staff of
partnering institutions
– On library premises or authenticated into
HathiTrust
• Partner libraries own a print copy
– One simultaneous user per print copy owned
• Users must be on U.S. soil
• One page at a time download
27. How do we facilitate uses?
• Fundamental issues of
– Identification
– Description
– Rights
28. Approach
• Collective problems as collective
• Web of relationships Rights
Records Digital
Volumes
Libraries Print Volumes
31. Automatic Rights Determination
• Conducted on all works at time of ingest and
when records are modified
– Public domain worldwide
• US works published before 1923, US federal
government publications, non-US works published prior
to 1872
– Public domain in the United States
• Non-US works published prior to 1923
32. Manual Rights Determination
• IMLS-funded CRMS project
– US-published works 1923-1963
– Conformance with formalities
– Expanding to non-US works
– Double-blind review with expert review for conflicts
– Staff at 4 HathiTrust partner institutions (15 will take
part in non-US)
– As of February 2012 ~190,000 reviewed, more than
100,000 opened
• Rights Holder Permissions
33. Breakdown of HathiTrust book corpus by publication date
Bibliographic Indeterminacy and the Scale of Problems and Opportunities of "Rights" in Digital Collection Building – 2/2011
42. A global change in the library environment
60%
Academic print book collection already substantially
50%
duplicated in mass digitized book corpus
June 2010
% of Titles in Local Collection
40% Median duplication: 31%
30%
20%
10% June 2009
Median duplication: 19%
0%
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Rank in 2008 ARL Investment Index
43. Digitized Books in Shared Repositories
~3.5M titles
3,500,000
~75% of mass digitized corpus is ‘backed up’ in one
or more shared print repositories
3,000,000 ~2.5M
2,500,000
Unique Titles
2,000,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
0
Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10
Mass digitized books in Hathi digital repository Mass digitized books in shared print repositories
44. Collection Management, Development
• Overlap
– More than 50% median overlap with ARL
institutions; higher for small liberal arts colleges
• Pricing model based on Print holdings
– Requires print holdings database
– Also support expansion of legal uses, efforts in de-
duplication
– Facilitate individual and collaborative collection
development and management operations
• Print monographs archiving
65. Comprehensive Picture
• “Definitional Issues”
– Identification, Description, Rights
• Discovery and Use
– Finding
– Relating (APIs and integration)
– Using (Reading, Computational activities)
• Collection management, development
• Preservation infrastructure
– Digital and Print
– Relationships
66. Work going forward
• Definitional elements
• Print archiving, management
• Discovery and use
– Lawful uses
• Research Center
• Quality
• Government documents
• Beyond books and journals
• Publishing
• Transitioning to next phase of partnership
67. How to find out more
• Web site “About” section
• http://www.hathitrust.org/about
• HathiTrust Research Center
• http://www.hathitrust.org/htrc
• Twitter
• http://twitter.com/hathitrust
• Monthly newsletter
• http://www.hathitrust.org/updates
• RSS: http://www.hathitrust.org/updates_rss
• Contact us: feedback@issues.hathitrust.org
• Blogs: http://www.hathitrust.org/blogs
• Large-scale search
• Perspectives from HathiTrust