The petitioning creditors, who are lenders under credit agreements with Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), filed involuntary bankruptcy petitions against the companies. The petitioners state that events of default have occurred, including the failure to pay over $57 million in interest and principal to first lien lenders and $9.6 million in interest to second lien lenders over the past two years. The petitioners further allege that Yucaipa, which controls Allied, engaged in conduct to prevent the lenders from exercising their rights despite the defaults. The petitioners assert that Allied is insolvent and unable to pay its debts, and needs a bankruptcy restructuring.
This document is an expedited motion by petitioning creditors BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Ltd., and Spectrum Investment Partners, LP for the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in the bankruptcy cases of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.). The petitioning creditors argue that a trustee should be appointed because Yucaipa American Alliance Fund I, LP's control over the debtors through its majority ownership of equity and appointment of board members creates conflicts of interest that prevent the debtors from fulfilling their fiduciary duties.
This affidavit provides background information and summarizes recent events regarding Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, LTD. (L.P.) (collectively "Allied"), who filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2005 and emerged in 2007.
Events of default occurred under Allied's credit agreements due to its deteriorating financial condition. In order to prevent majority shareholder Yucaipa from gaining control and harming lender interests, an amendment placed restrictions on Yucaipa becoming a lender, including limits on the amount of loans it could acquire.
This affidavit supports a motion by petitioning creditors to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee for Allied, claiming Yucaipa's actions have harmed their
The following representations and warranties of Seller shall apply as specified in the Transaction Specific Terms, and if no election is made in the Transaction Specific Terms, then all of the following representations and warranties shall apply:
(a) (i) Seller owns and has good and marketable title to the Loans which are being transferred hereunder and the assignment to Buyer constitutes a valid sale, transfer and assignment of such Loans, free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other security interest, (ii) Seller owns and has good and marketable title to the Commitments which are being transferred hereunder and the assignment to Buyer constitutes a valid sale, transfer and assignment of such Commitments, free and clear of
This article discusses issues facing individual debtors seeking relief under Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It argues that Congress should amend the Bankruptcy Code to make Chapter 11 work better for individual debtors while still protecting creditors. Specifically, it recommends that Congress: (1) abrogate the absolute priority rule for individual debtors so they can retain assets needed for a fresh start, and (2) allow an unsecured creditor's rejecting vote on a repayment plan to trigger the requirement that the debtor pay disposable income to unsecured creditors. These changes would help individuals reorganize debts under Chapter 11 without losing essential assets, while ensuring fair treatment of creditors.
This document is a declaration by Scott D. Macaulay, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), in support of motions to transfer bankruptcy proceedings to another court. It provides background on Allied's car hauling business, operations, customers, labor agreements, and financial difficulties following a decline in production by automotive manufacturers since Allied's 2007 bankruptcy reorganization.
This document provides an overview and discussion of Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code from the perspective of key participants in Subchapter V cases. It begins with background on Subchapter V and how it provides a streamlined process for small business reorganizations. It then discusses expectations and roles of the main participants in Subchapter V cases - the bankruptcy judge, United States Trustee, Subchapter V Trustee, debtor, creditors, and their attorneys. Open issues with Subchapter V are also identified, such as how to determine the length of payment plans and how to define disposable income for business debtors.
The New Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage RuleLaura Hite
The webinar reviewed the Dodd-Frank Act's Ability to Repay requirements for residential mortgage loans, the Bureau's proposed definition of a qualified mortgage and how lenders making such loans can comply with the Ability to Repay requirements. We also reviewed the rule’s anticipated effective date, as well as its expected impacts on mortgage operations and product offerings going forward. Attendees will receive the most recent information on this soon to be issued Bureau rule, how to plan for the operational challenges to comply with the new Ability to Repay and qualified mortgage requirements.
This document summarizes a presentation by Terry W. Clemans on rapid rescoring and compliance infractions. The presentation discusses (1) new conflicts between various financial regulations regarding loan originator compensation and the rescoring of mortgages, (2) definitions of compensation under the relevant rules, and (3) issues with the Credit Repair Organization Act's prohibition of upfront fees for credit services that could restrict how rescoring fees are charged. The presentation seeks answers to compliance challenges but notes more legislative or regulatory action may be needed to resolve conflicts between the rules.
This document is an expedited motion by petitioning creditors BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Ltd., and Spectrum Investment Partners, LP for the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in the bankruptcy cases of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.). The petitioning creditors argue that a trustee should be appointed because Yucaipa American Alliance Fund I, LP's control over the debtors through its majority ownership of equity and appointment of board members creates conflicts of interest that prevent the debtors from fulfilling their fiduciary duties.
This affidavit provides background information and summarizes recent events regarding Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, LTD. (L.P.) (collectively "Allied"), who filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2005 and emerged in 2007.
Events of default occurred under Allied's credit agreements due to its deteriorating financial condition. In order to prevent majority shareholder Yucaipa from gaining control and harming lender interests, an amendment placed restrictions on Yucaipa becoming a lender, including limits on the amount of loans it could acquire.
This affidavit supports a motion by petitioning creditors to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee for Allied, claiming Yucaipa's actions have harmed their
The following representations and warranties of Seller shall apply as specified in the Transaction Specific Terms, and if no election is made in the Transaction Specific Terms, then all of the following representations and warranties shall apply:
(a) (i) Seller owns and has good and marketable title to the Loans which are being transferred hereunder and the assignment to Buyer constitutes a valid sale, transfer and assignment of such Loans, free and clear of any lien, encumbrance or other security interest, (ii) Seller owns and has good and marketable title to the Commitments which are being transferred hereunder and the assignment to Buyer constitutes a valid sale, transfer and assignment of such Commitments, free and clear of
This article discusses issues facing individual debtors seeking relief under Chapter 11 bankruptcy. It argues that Congress should amend the Bankruptcy Code to make Chapter 11 work better for individual debtors while still protecting creditors. Specifically, it recommends that Congress: (1) abrogate the absolute priority rule for individual debtors so they can retain assets needed for a fresh start, and (2) allow an unsecured creditor's rejecting vote on a repayment plan to trigger the requirement that the debtor pay disposable income to unsecured creditors. These changes would help individuals reorganize debts under Chapter 11 without losing essential assets, while ensuring fair treatment of creditors.
This document is a declaration by Scott D. Macaulay, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), in support of motions to transfer bankruptcy proceedings to another court. It provides background on Allied's car hauling business, operations, customers, labor agreements, and financial difficulties following a decline in production by automotive manufacturers since Allied's 2007 bankruptcy reorganization.
This document provides an overview and discussion of Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code from the perspective of key participants in Subchapter V cases. It begins with background on Subchapter V and how it provides a streamlined process for small business reorganizations. It then discusses expectations and roles of the main participants in Subchapter V cases - the bankruptcy judge, United States Trustee, Subchapter V Trustee, debtor, creditors, and their attorneys. Open issues with Subchapter V are also identified, such as how to determine the length of payment plans and how to define disposable income for business debtors.
The New Ability to Repay and Qualified Mortgage RuleLaura Hite
The webinar reviewed the Dodd-Frank Act's Ability to Repay requirements for residential mortgage loans, the Bureau's proposed definition of a qualified mortgage and how lenders making such loans can comply with the Ability to Repay requirements. We also reviewed the rule’s anticipated effective date, as well as its expected impacts on mortgage operations and product offerings going forward. Attendees will receive the most recent information on this soon to be issued Bureau rule, how to plan for the operational challenges to comply with the new Ability to Repay and qualified mortgage requirements.
This document summarizes a presentation by Terry W. Clemans on rapid rescoring and compliance infractions. The presentation discusses (1) new conflicts between various financial regulations regarding loan originator compensation and the rescoring of mortgages, (2) definitions of compensation under the relevant rules, and (3) issues with the Credit Repair Organization Act's prohibition of upfront fees for credit services that could restrict how rescoring fees are charged. The presentation seeks answers to compliance challenges but notes more legislative or regulatory action may be needed to resolve conflicts between the rules.
FASB Update - presented by McGladrey at June 2011 NYSSCPA Private Company Acc...Brian Marshall
The document summarizes recent updates from the FASB, including significant accounting standards updates issued in 2010-2011. It discusses updates related to disclosures about credit quality and troubled debt restructurings, consolidation of repurchase agreements, impairment testing of goodwill, and accounting for costs of acquiring insurance contracts. The document also provides an overview of the FASB's priorities and recent board member changes.
The Bankruptcy process and some of its legislation conceptsSuzzanne Uhland
Bankruptcy is one of the most important concepts for today’s companies to understand, not only for knowing what to do in an insolvency situation, but also for the options and alternatives given by its legislation.
What do you understand about Bankruptcy Laws - David Ford Avon CTDavid Ford Avon Ct
This document provides information about various topics related to creditors' remedies and bankruptcy proceedings:
1. It defines different types of creditors' liens like mechanic's liens, artisan's liens, and innkeeper's liens. It also outlines prejudgment attachments and writs of execution that creditors can use.
2. It differentiates between suretyship, where a third party agrees to be liable for a debt, and guaranty arrangements.
3. It provides an overview of the typical steps in a bankruptcy proceeding and compares the different chapters available under the bankruptcy code.
This document is an affidavit from Mark Weinsten in support of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and the relief sought in various first day motions. It provides background on LodgeNet's financial difficulties and proposed restructuring, including a $60 million investment from Colony Capital in exchange for 100% ownership of reorganized LodgeNet under a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan that has already received creditor support. The affidavit also summarizes various motions seeking court approval of procedures to allow LodgeNet to continue operating in bankruptcy with minimal disruption.
United Corporate Services provides search and filing results tailored specifically to our clients’ needs. Reports sorted by individual debtor per page, or a more comprehensive summary report of all search results on one page, both are easily provided in either .pdf format for secure closings or in Excel format for easy manipulation into your existing closing binder. United Corporate Services files and searches in over 3,000 jurisdictions in the U.S. Understanding their unique requirements ensures accurate processing of all your UCC transactions. Revised Article 9 is once again being “revised,” and we have done the legwork necessary to walk with you through your projects to ensure they are completed timely and accurately.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed an application seeking approval to retain the law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP ("Young Conaway") as its Delaware bankruptcy counsel. Young Conaway has extensive experience in bankruptcy matters and represented the debtor pre-petition. The application discloses Young Conaway's hourly rates, retention agreement with the debtor, and that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the debtor or the bankruptcy estate. The debtor believes that retaining Young Conaway as Delaware bankruptcy counsel is in the best interests of the estate. A hearing on the application will be held on July 27, 2012.
This document is a motion filed in United States Bankruptcy Court requesting an order to shorten the notice period for a hearing on the appointment of a trustee. The motion was filed by petitioning creditors against Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), who were recently subject to involuntary bankruptcy petitions. The motion argues that exigent circumstances exist due to conflicts of interest and mismanagement by the company's controlling shareholder, Yucaipa, that threaten creditor interests. As such, an expedited hearing is requested to consider appointing a trustee to assume control of the debtors.
Commitment Letters in Commercial Loans Borrower and Lender Strategies to Nego...Allen Matkins
This presentation provides guidance to counsel to lenders and borrowers on negotiating loan commitment letters. The panel will outline best practices for enforcing loan commitments and resolving disputes.
Bankruptcy law in the_united_states_rulesRahul Mishra
Bankruptcy law in the United States allows individuals and organizations to legally deal with inability to pay debts. There are two main types of bankruptcy - voluntary, initiated by the debtor, and involuntary, initiated by creditors. The primary purposes of bankruptcy are to give honest debtors a fresh start by discharging most debts, and to repay creditors in an orderly manner. Bankruptcy proceedings involve filing a petition with financial information to establish a bankruptcy estate. There are two main forms - liquidation under Chapter 7, where non-exempt assets are sold to repay creditors, and reorganization under Chapters 11 or 13, where debts are restructured to allow debt repayment over time.
Do you want to transfer all your hard earned assets to your loved ones? Have you worked whole your life and you want to be secure for the future of your family? For more information visit: http://margarianlaw.com/
(1) Commitment letters outline the basic terms of a proposed loan between a lender and borrower, such as the loan amount, interest rate, fees, collateral requirements, and conditions that must be met for funding.
(2) Key terms that should be included are the loan amount and type, interest rate provisions, fees, collateral, insurance requirements, default provisions, and customary representations and warranties.
(3) The commitment letter establishes the lender's agreement to provide financing upon satisfaction of due diligence conditions and typically includes an expiration date by which the borrower must accept the proposed terms.
The document discusses key concepts in US bankruptcy law, including:
1) Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows for reorganization of a business while Chapter 7 involves liquidation of assets. Chapter 11 is increasingly being used for liquidations through selling the business as a "going concern".
2) Upon filing for bankruptcy, an automatic stay is put into place that prevents creditors from collecting pre-petition debts or taking other collection actions without court approval.
3) Debtors often file "first day motions", including motions to approve debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing to continue operating during bankruptcy. Courts usually approve DIP financing to allow debtors to continue operating.
4) The document provides an overview
The document is a court opinion regarding a case between Advanta Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The court held that the FDIC exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a temporary cease and desist order to prevent transactions between Advanta Bank and its affiliates. The court found that the process of terminating the bank's insurance, which the FDIC had initiated, and winding up its affairs was causing the dissipation of assets, not any unsafe banking practices. Therefore, the FDIC's order was an attempt to intervene after the fact. The court granted the bank's motion for an injunction and denied the FDIC's motion to stay the injunction pending appeal.
The US housing market crashed in the late 2000s, forcing many homebuilders like Tousa Inc. into bankruptcy. Tousa had taken on over $1 billion in debt to fund its rapid expansion. In 2007, Tousa arranged $500 million in new loans from banks like Citigroup and Wells Fargo, using subsidiaries as co-borrowers. Most of the funds paid off prior loans. Within 6 months, Tousa filed for bankruptcy. The court ruled the 2007 loans were fraudulent conveyances under bankruptcy law since the subsidiaries received no value and became insolvent as a result. The court voided $500 million in debt and ordered the banks to return the funds.
PHH - Consumer Financial Services Alert 22 June 2015 FINALOri Lev
The CFPB issued its first final decision in a contested administrative proceeding against PHH Corp. Director Cordray overturned the ALJ's ruling and ordered PHH to pay over $109 million in disgorgement, much higher than the $6.4 million recommended by the ALJ. Key aspects of the decision include that no statute of limitations applies to CFPB administrative actions under RESPA, RESPA violations accrue when kickbacks are paid rather than at closing, and Section 8(c)(2) of RESPA does not shield payments for referrals even if they are at fair market value. The decision establishes significant new precedents around RESPA interpretation and CFPB administrative procedures.
The document provides guidance on FHA mortgage eligibility for borrowers who had previously undergone a short sale or short payoff on their home. It states that borrowers are eligible if they were current on their mortgage at the time of the short sale, but ineligible for 3 years if they were in default. Exceptions can be made if the default was due to circumstances beyond the borrower's control. It also allows for refinancing with a short payoff if the borrower is current and there is insufficient equity or reduced income to pay off the existing debt.
This document makes several amendments to regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations related to the operations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Specifically, it updates address information for the OCC in several parts and removes references to outdated website addresses. It also removes subpart F from part 34 and removes part 40 in their entirety. These changes update OCC contact information and remove outdated or unnecessary regulations.
Authorisation under the new Consumer Credit regimeRachel Tandy
As of 1 April 2014. consumer credit businesses must now be authorised under FSMA rather than licensed under the Consumer Credit Act. These slides summarise the key changes.
bankruptcy abuse prevention and consumer protection act of 2005 presentationwcodell
The document summarizes several key changes brought about by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), including new bankruptcy exemptions, definitions of "debt relief agencies", affirmative obligations and restrictions placed on such agencies, means testing procedures to determine eligibility for Chapter 7, and new educational requirements for debtors.
The document provides release notes for Desktop Underwriter (DU) Version 9.1, which will be implemented in November 2013. Key changes include retiring the interest-only and 40-year loan options, updating qualifying rate requirements, enhancing DU Refi Plus, and lowering the maximum LTV to 95%. It also provides updates to how DU will identify and handle loans for borrowers with prior foreclosures, deeds-in-lieu, or preforeclosure sales.
The document appears to be a court filing related to a bankruptcy case from May 31, 2013. It includes page numbers but no other distinguishing content on each of 24 numbered pages. The document provides identifying information about a case and filing but lacks substantive information about its purpose or contents.
This 3-page court document from June 10, 2013 pertains to Case 13-11153-CSS. It contains standard legal language and formatting across its 3 pages but does not include any substantive details about the specific case or its proceedings.
FASB Update - presented by McGladrey at June 2011 NYSSCPA Private Company Acc...Brian Marshall
The document summarizes recent updates from the FASB, including significant accounting standards updates issued in 2010-2011. It discusses updates related to disclosures about credit quality and troubled debt restructurings, consolidation of repurchase agreements, impairment testing of goodwill, and accounting for costs of acquiring insurance contracts. The document also provides an overview of the FASB's priorities and recent board member changes.
The Bankruptcy process and some of its legislation conceptsSuzzanne Uhland
Bankruptcy is one of the most important concepts for today’s companies to understand, not only for knowing what to do in an insolvency situation, but also for the options and alternatives given by its legislation.
What do you understand about Bankruptcy Laws - David Ford Avon CTDavid Ford Avon Ct
This document provides information about various topics related to creditors' remedies and bankruptcy proceedings:
1. It defines different types of creditors' liens like mechanic's liens, artisan's liens, and innkeeper's liens. It also outlines prejudgment attachments and writs of execution that creditors can use.
2. It differentiates between suretyship, where a third party agrees to be liable for a debt, and guaranty arrangements.
3. It provides an overview of the typical steps in a bankruptcy proceeding and compares the different chapters available under the bankruptcy code.
This document is an affidavit from Mark Weinsten in support of LodgeNet Interactive Corporation filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and the relief sought in various first day motions. It provides background on LodgeNet's financial difficulties and proposed restructuring, including a $60 million investment from Colony Capital in exchange for 100% ownership of reorganized LodgeNet under a prepackaged Chapter 11 plan that has already received creditor support. The affidavit also summarizes various motions seeking court approval of procedures to allow LodgeNet to continue operating in bankruptcy with minimal disruption.
United Corporate Services provides search and filing results tailored specifically to our clients’ needs. Reports sorted by individual debtor per page, or a more comprehensive summary report of all search results on one page, both are easily provided in either .pdf format for secure closings or in Excel format for easy manipulation into your existing closing binder. United Corporate Services files and searches in over 3,000 jurisdictions in the U.S. Understanding their unique requirements ensures accurate processing of all your UCC transactions. Revised Article 9 is once again being “revised,” and we have done the legwork necessary to walk with you through your projects to ensure they are completed timely and accurately.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed an application seeking approval to retain the law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP ("Young Conaway") as its Delaware bankruptcy counsel. Young Conaway has extensive experience in bankruptcy matters and represented the debtor pre-petition. The application discloses Young Conaway's hourly rates, retention agreement with the debtor, and that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the debtor or the bankruptcy estate. The debtor believes that retaining Young Conaway as Delaware bankruptcy counsel is in the best interests of the estate. A hearing on the application will be held on July 27, 2012.
This document is a motion filed in United States Bankruptcy Court requesting an order to shorten the notice period for a hearing on the appointment of a trustee. The motion was filed by petitioning creditors against Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), who were recently subject to involuntary bankruptcy petitions. The motion argues that exigent circumstances exist due to conflicts of interest and mismanagement by the company's controlling shareholder, Yucaipa, that threaten creditor interests. As such, an expedited hearing is requested to consider appointing a trustee to assume control of the debtors.
Commitment Letters in Commercial Loans Borrower and Lender Strategies to Nego...Allen Matkins
This presentation provides guidance to counsel to lenders and borrowers on negotiating loan commitment letters. The panel will outline best practices for enforcing loan commitments and resolving disputes.
Bankruptcy law in the_united_states_rulesRahul Mishra
Bankruptcy law in the United States allows individuals and organizations to legally deal with inability to pay debts. There are two main types of bankruptcy - voluntary, initiated by the debtor, and involuntary, initiated by creditors. The primary purposes of bankruptcy are to give honest debtors a fresh start by discharging most debts, and to repay creditors in an orderly manner. Bankruptcy proceedings involve filing a petition with financial information to establish a bankruptcy estate. There are two main forms - liquidation under Chapter 7, where non-exempt assets are sold to repay creditors, and reorganization under Chapters 11 or 13, where debts are restructured to allow debt repayment over time.
Do you want to transfer all your hard earned assets to your loved ones? Have you worked whole your life and you want to be secure for the future of your family? For more information visit: http://margarianlaw.com/
(1) Commitment letters outline the basic terms of a proposed loan between a lender and borrower, such as the loan amount, interest rate, fees, collateral requirements, and conditions that must be met for funding.
(2) Key terms that should be included are the loan amount and type, interest rate provisions, fees, collateral, insurance requirements, default provisions, and customary representations and warranties.
(3) The commitment letter establishes the lender's agreement to provide financing upon satisfaction of due diligence conditions and typically includes an expiration date by which the borrower must accept the proposed terms.
The document discusses key concepts in US bankruptcy law, including:
1) Chapter 11 bankruptcy allows for reorganization of a business while Chapter 7 involves liquidation of assets. Chapter 11 is increasingly being used for liquidations through selling the business as a "going concern".
2) Upon filing for bankruptcy, an automatic stay is put into place that prevents creditors from collecting pre-petition debts or taking other collection actions without court approval.
3) Debtors often file "first day motions", including motions to approve debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing to continue operating during bankruptcy. Courts usually approve DIP financing to allow debtors to continue operating.
4) The document provides an overview
The document is a court opinion regarding a case between Advanta Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). The court held that the FDIC exceeded its statutory authority by issuing a temporary cease and desist order to prevent transactions between Advanta Bank and its affiliates. The court found that the process of terminating the bank's insurance, which the FDIC had initiated, and winding up its affairs was causing the dissipation of assets, not any unsafe banking practices. Therefore, the FDIC's order was an attempt to intervene after the fact. The court granted the bank's motion for an injunction and denied the FDIC's motion to stay the injunction pending appeal.
The US housing market crashed in the late 2000s, forcing many homebuilders like Tousa Inc. into bankruptcy. Tousa had taken on over $1 billion in debt to fund its rapid expansion. In 2007, Tousa arranged $500 million in new loans from banks like Citigroup and Wells Fargo, using subsidiaries as co-borrowers. Most of the funds paid off prior loans. Within 6 months, Tousa filed for bankruptcy. The court ruled the 2007 loans were fraudulent conveyances under bankruptcy law since the subsidiaries received no value and became insolvent as a result. The court voided $500 million in debt and ordered the banks to return the funds.
PHH - Consumer Financial Services Alert 22 June 2015 FINALOri Lev
The CFPB issued its first final decision in a contested administrative proceeding against PHH Corp. Director Cordray overturned the ALJ's ruling and ordered PHH to pay over $109 million in disgorgement, much higher than the $6.4 million recommended by the ALJ. Key aspects of the decision include that no statute of limitations applies to CFPB administrative actions under RESPA, RESPA violations accrue when kickbacks are paid rather than at closing, and Section 8(c)(2) of RESPA does not shield payments for referrals even if they are at fair market value. The decision establishes significant new precedents around RESPA interpretation and CFPB administrative procedures.
The document provides guidance on FHA mortgage eligibility for borrowers who had previously undergone a short sale or short payoff on their home. It states that borrowers are eligible if they were current on their mortgage at the time of the short sale, but ineligible for 3 years if they were in default. Exceptions can be made if the default was due to circumstances beyond the borrower's control. It also allows for refinancing with a short payoff if the borrower is current and there is insufficient equity or reduced income to pay off the existing debt.
This document makes several amendments to regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations related to the operations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). Specifically, it updates address information for the OCC in several parts and removes references to outdated website addresses. It also removes subpart F from part 34 and removes part 40 in their entirety. These changes update OCC contact information and remove outdated or unnecessary regulations.
Authorisation under the new Consumer Credit regimeRachel Tandy
As of 1 April 2014. consumer credit businesses must now be authorised under FSMA rather than licensed under the Consumer Credit Act. These slides summarise the key changes.
bankruptcy abuse prevention and consumer protection act of 2005 presentationwcodell
The document summarizes several key changes brought about by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), including new bankruptcy exemptions, definitions of "debt relief agencies", affirmative obligations and restrictions placed on such agencies, means testing procedures to determine eligibility for Chapter 7, and new educational requirements for debtors.
The document provides release notes for Desktop Underwriter (DU) Version 9.1, which will be implemented in November 2013. Key changes include retiring the interest-only and 40-year loan options, updating qualifying rate requirements, enhancing DU Refi Plus, and lowering the maximum LTV to 95%. It also provides updates to how DU will identify and handle loans for borrowers with prior foreclosures, deeds-in-lieu, or preforeclosure sales.
The document appears to be a court filing related to a bankruptcy case from May 31, 2013. It includes page numbers but no other distinguishing content on each of 24 numbered pages. The document provides identifying information about a case and filing but lacks substantive information about its purpose or contents.
This 3-page court document from June 10, 2013 pertains to Case 13-11153-CSS. It contains standard legal language and formatting across its 3 pages but does not include any substantive details about the specific case or its proceedings.
This document is a motion filed in United States Bankruptcy Court requesting an expedited hearing for a separate motion to file certain documents under seal. The motion provides background on involuntary bankruptcy petitions recently filed against Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. It argues that expedited relief is necessary due to exigent circumstances, including the risk of harm to creditors from ongoing conflicts of interest if relief is not granted quickly. The motion requests that the court schedule a hearing on the separate motion to seal within two days and set the objection deadline on the same expedited schedule.
This document is a declaration in support of a motion to appoint a Chapter 11 trustee in the bankruptcy cases of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.). The declaration attaches exhibits related to Allied's bankruptcy proceedings, including a proposed joint reorganization plan, communications between Allied and General Motors regarding a proposed plan amendment, and complaints filed in related litigation. The declaration is submitted by a partner at Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, which represents petitioning creditors seeking the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee.
The document is a docket filing from December 30, 2011 with the number 0009. It relates to a legal case but provides no other details on the nature of the case or contents of the filing.
This affidavit provides testimony in support of an involuntary bankruptcy petition filed by Spectrum Investment Partners LP and other petitioning creditors against Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.). [1] Jeffrey Schaffer, the Managing Member of Spectrum Group Management LLC, which is the investment manager of Spectrum, states that [2] Spectrum is a creditor of the alleged debtors based on loans made under a 2007 first lien credit agreement, and is owed over $21.5 million. [3] The affidavit attaches documentation of assignments establishing Spectrum's status and claims as a creditor with standing to file the involuntary bankruptcy petition.
The document summarizes key details about corporations facing financial difficulty and bankruptcy procedures. It provides answers to questions about options for distressed companies, differences between Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 bankruptcy, requirements for involuntary bankruptcy petitions, typical components of reorganization plans, accounting for fresh start adjustments, financial reporting requirements, creditor priority in liquidations, and trustee responsibilities in Chapter 7 liquidations.
The document discusses valuation considerations for distressed securities. It defines distressed securities and describes the causes of distress and typical corrective actions like restructuring or bankruptcy. It provides an overview of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process, which involves three phases: filing, negotiation, and approval. The document also discusses types of distressed securities, investors in the space, investment strategies, and fair value measurement considerations under FAS 157.
The document is an affidavit from Jeffrey A. Schaffer, the Managing Member of Spectrum Group Management LLC, in support of a motion by petitioning creditors for the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee in the bankruptcy cases of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.).
Mr. Schaffer states that Spectrum is a lender under both the first lien and second lien credit agreements with Allied. He adopts statements from another affidavit in support of the motion. He attaches copies of the second lien credit agreement and several amendments as exhibits.
The Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement makes several changes:
1) It allows Calpine to use $45 million of debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing proceeds to fund its portion of a joint venture in Canada for the construction of a power plant.
2) It replaces approximately $65 million in expiring letters of credit from another facility with new letters of credit issued under the DIP revolver, increasing the letter of credit commitment.
3) It clarifies that cash collateral provided for trading contracts has first priority liens as permitted by a bankruptcy court order.
4) It gives the administrative agents discretion
The Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement makes several changes:
1) It allows Calpine to use $45 million of debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing proceeds to fund its portion of a joint venture in Canada for the construction of a power plant.
2) It replaces approximately $65 million in expiring letters of credit under another facility with new letters of credit issued under the DIP revolver, increasing the letter of credit commitment.
3) It clarifies that cash collateral provided for trading contracts has first priority liens as permitted by a bankruptcy court order.
4) It gives the administrative agents discretion
This document is a certificate of service for a response filed by Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.) regarding a motion by petitioning creditors BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Adviser L.L.C., and Spectrum Investment Partners LP to shorten time for a hearing on appointing a trustee. The certificate lists the parties that were served the response by mail or hand delivery on May 21, 2012.
Creditor\'s Rights and Bankruptcy Issues in Real Estate Lawterigrasmussen
Discusses how creditors should deal with a recently filed case, the automatic stay, leasing, use and sale of assets, and nonbankruptcy remedies available to creditors, including receiverships, foreclosures, creditors\' bill, charging order, and assignments for the benefit of creditors
Fisker's bankruptcy filing that lays out incomekatiefehren
This document provides global notes, methodology, and specific disclosures for the schedules of assets and liabilities and statements of financial affairs filed by Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc. and Fisker Automotive, Inc. (the "Debtors"). It was filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware as part of the Debtors' Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The document provides information on the Debtors' process for preparing the schedules and statements, including that they reflect book values as of November 21, 2013 and are not intended as fully reconciled financial statements. It also includes reservations of rights and explanations of methodology regarding the treatment of various assets, liabilities, claims, and other items.
Be the attorney you dreamed of being. Jump start your career with Tully Rinckey PLLC:
http://www.tullylegal.com/careers/
May, 2015 - This course will be led by Tully Rinckey PLLC Senior Counsel Robert J. Rock, Esq. Mr. Rock will draw upon his over thirty years of experience as a bankruptcy attorney. Mr. Rock will provide guidance to attorneys on alternatives to bankruptcy, evaluating client qualifications for bankruptcy, types of bankruptcy cases, and major laws and rules practitioners should know. Mr. Rock will also provide insight into tactics to avoid potential pitfalls with clients and their bankruptcy petitions.
The document is a memorandum from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Credit Suisse, as joint administrative agents, to lenders regarding a proposed Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement between Calpine Corporation and the lenders. The memorandum requests lender approval for the Fourth Amendment by February 28th. The Fourth Amendment includes provisions to allow for additional investments in a greenfield project partnership and the contribution of Santa Rosa power plant assets to a new subsidiary in order to restructure a power purchase agreement.
The document is a memorandum from Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and Credit Suisse, as joint administrative agents, to lenders regarding a proposed Fourth Amendment to the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement between Calpine Corporation and the lenders. The memorandum requests lender approval for amendments that would (1) increase the limit on Calpine investments in a greenfield project partnership from $45 million to $68 million, and (2) allow Calpine to transfer power plant assets in Santa Rosa, California to a subsidiary in order to generate cash flow from a restructured power purchase agreement. Lenders are asked to sign and return the signature page to approve the amendments by February 28 at
This document discusses accounting for legal reorganizations and liquidations under bankruptcy. It covers key aspects of bankruptcy law, including the goals of fair distribution of assets and discharge of debt. It describes the differences between voluntary and involuntary bankruptcy, as well as the processes for liquidation under Chapter 7 and reorganization under Chapter 11. It also addresses financial reporting requirements during and after bankruptcy proceedings, including the option for fresh start accounting when certain conditions are met.
This chapter discusses bankruptcy, including the different types of bankruptcy proceedings (Chapter 7 liquidation, Chapter 11 reorganization, and Chapter 13 adjustment of debts for individuals), general principles of bankruptcy, procedural steps, the roles of trustees and administrators, and treatment of creditors. The key types of bankruptcy proceedings address liquidating assets and discharging debts (Chapter 7), reorganizing finances through a court-approved plan (Chapter 11), and adjusting individual debts through a repayment plan (Chapter 13).
Petitioning creditor Spectrum Investment Partners LP partially waives its claim against debtors Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.) up to $5,000 to ensure it qualifies as an unsecured creditor under Section 303(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. Spectrum is owed over $21.5 million by the debtors and believes the debtors' assets are insufficient to satisfy the full claim, making it an undersecured creditor. However, the partial waiver of $5,000 ensures there is over $15,000 in unsecured claims among the three petitioning creditors, meeting the requirements to commence an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy case against the debtors.
This document is a partial waiver of claim by BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, one of the petitioning creditors in an involuntary Chapter 11 bankruptcy case against Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.). BDCM owes over $26.8 million to the debtors but believes the debtors' assets are insufficient to satisfy the debt. However, to ensure it qualifies as an unsecured creditor under Section 303(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, BDCM waives its right to any security interests in the debtors' assets up to $5,000. With this partial waiver, along with claims from other petitioning creditors, there is over $15,000 in aggregate
Fletcher International, Ltd. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the Southern District of New York. The document includes Fletcher International's schedules of assets and liabilities as required by the bankruptcy code. It notes that the schedules are unaudited and subject to ongoing review and potential adjustment. It also includes global notes describing Fletcher International's significant accounting policies and limitations on the information provided in the schedules.
This document provides feedback on a student assignment regarding a Sovereign Debt Restructuring Mechanism (SDRM). It discusses the student's strengths in presenting cases for and against an SDRM using insights from international law. If implemented, an SDRM could help resolve debt crises more efficiently than current ad hoc methods. However, there are also challenges to enforcing sovereign debt contracts internationally due to issues with jurisdiction over sovereign assets. The document analyzes examples like Argentina's ongoing debt restructuring to explore legal and institutional aspects of SDRMs.
This document is an objection filed by petitioning creditors BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Ltd., and Spectrum Investment Partners, LP in response to a motion by alleged debtors Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.) to transfer venue of involuntary bankruptcy cases from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The petitioning creditors argue that the motion to transfer venue is procedurally defective and substantively objectionable. They assert the motion is premature until an order for relief is entered, and the alleged debtors have not met their burden to show transfer is in the
The document is a 43-page legal filing that contains no substantive information. It consists of repetitive page headers on each page indicating it was filed on October 24, 2012 as document 5-1 of case 12-17804-pmc. No other notable details are provided in the document.
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p1Randall Reese
The document appears to be a 94-page court filing related to a case from 2013. It includes repeated references to pages in a document filed on a given date, but there is no other contextual information provided.
Revstone sale transaction support agreement summaryRandall Reese
This document summarizes key terms of an agreement related to the sale of automotive assets. It outlines conditions that must be met for the agreement to take effect, including various parties executing related agreements. It then details milestones and deadlines for the sale of different business units, including Metavation, Contech facilities, Eptec's non-damper business, and CLS assets. Specific deadlines are set for tasks like obtaining letters of intent, executing asset purchase agreements, holding auctions, and completing sales. Failure to meet the milestones would constitute a violation of the agreement.
This document provides notice of Patriot Coal Corporation's motion seeking court approval to conduct rights offerings as part of its chapter 11 reorganization plan. Specifically, the motion seeks authorization to enter into a backstop purchase agreement with certain funds to ensure sufficient proceeds are raised in the rights offerings. The rights offerings will allow eligible creditors to purchase new senior secured notes and warrants. The motion also seeks approval of the proposed rights offerings procedures. Objections to the motion are due by October 30, with a hearing scheduled for November 6.
This document is a plan support agreement between Newland International Properties Corp. (the "Debtor") and holders of at least a majority of the Debtor's outstanding 9.50% Senior Secured Notes due 2014 (the "Initial Supporting Noteholders"). The agreement provides that the parties will support a prepackaged bankruptcy plan to restructure the Debtor's obligations under the Notes. Key terms include: (1) the Debtor and Initial Supporting Noteholders will negotiate restructuring documents consistent with the terms in an attached term sheet; (2) the Initial Supporting Noteholders agree to vote in favor of the prepackaged bankruptcy plan and direct the Notes' trustee to cooperate; and (3) the Debt
This document is a 9-page court filing related to case 12-71188-bem. It includes the case number, document number, filing date, and page numbers but no other descriptive text.
This document is a plan support agreement between KIT digital, Inc. and three sponsors (JEC Capital Partners, Ratio Capital Partners, and Prescott Group Capital Management) to implement a restructuring of KIT digital's debt. Key points:
- The sponsors deposited $1.5 million in escrow and committed to fund the restructuring.
- The parties agree to support a chapter 11 plan of reorganization consistent with the terms in Exhibit A, which sets forth the restructuring proposal.
- The sponsors and company agree not to support any alternative restructuring transactions, except the company can consider superior offers if required by its fiduciary duties to shareholders.
The document is a 25-page court filing in the case 13-10060-MFW filed on June 18, 2013. However, it does not contain any substantive information beyond procedural identifiers on each page.
The document is a 25-page court filing in the case of 13-10060-MFW filed on June 18, 2013. It includes page numbers but no other distinguishing content on each page.
This 6-page document contains no text, only headers indicating it is a court filing related to case 13-11456, document 817-1, filed on October 18, 2013. The document is labeled Exhibit A and consists of 6 blank pages with a note that signature pages have been redacted from an original filing.
This document is a plan support agreement between GMX Resources Inc., Diamond Blue Drilling Inc., Endeavor Pipeline Inc. (collectively, the "Debtors"), holders of Senior Secured Notes ("Consenting Senior Secured Noteholders"), and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors ("Creditors' Committee"). The parties agree to support a restructuring plan under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code consistent with the terms of the attached term sheet. The parties will seek Bankruptcy Court approval of the plan support agreement and work together in good faith to negotiate definitive agreements to implement the restructuring plan.
The document is a 9-page legal filing related to case number 13-30340. It includes boilerplate language identifying the case number, date of filing, and page numbers. No other substantive information is provided in the document.
Friend finder transaction support agreementRandall Reese
The document appears to be a 40-page court exhibit filed on September 17, 2013 in the case of 13-12404-CSS. However, the content of the exhibit is not provided in the document text. It only lists page numbers and headers repeating the case information across 40 numbered pages, so no essential information could be summarized from the content.
The document appears to be a case filing containing 40 numbered pages related to Case 13-10164. It includes documentation of filed documents and dates but no other contextual information that would help summarize the essential information or high-level purpose of the case filing.
This document is a restructuring support agreement between Excel Maritime Carriers Limited and its subsidiaries (the "Company") and the consenting lenders (the "Consenting Lenders"). It sets forth the terms for a restructuring of the Company as outlined in an attached term sheet. The parties agree to support a pre-arranged reorganization plan for the Company consistent with the term sheet. The Consenting Lenders agree to support the restructuring and plan, not take actions to oppose or delay them, and waive any defaults related to the restructuring. The parties will negotiate definitive restructuring documents consistent with the term sheet and agreement.
The debtors filed a motion seeking court approval of a Plan Support Agreement between the debtors, Clean Harbors, and Guggenheim. The Plan Support Agreement provides for Clean Harbors to sponsor a plan of reorganization to purchase EEHI's stock in EOI (effectively purchasing EOI's business as a going concern) and implement a financial restructuring. The motion seeks an order authorizing the debtors to enter into the Plan Support Agreement and take necessary steps to consummate its terms, including obtaining approval of bidding procedures, a disclosure statement, and plan confirmation.
This document is a notice of motion filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois regarding Debtors' motion to approve entry into a plan sponsor agreement with NRG Energy, Inc. and related relief. Key details include:
- Debtors have entered into an agreement with NRG Energy, Inc. to acquire substantially all of Debtors' assets and equity interests, to be effectuated through a chapter 11 plan.
- The agreement is supported by Debtors' major creditor groups, including an official unsecured creditors committee, a group of senior unsecured noteholders, and parties related to certain of Debtors' power plants.
- The notice sets an objection deadline of October 22, 2013
The document is a court order authorizing the assumption of a Restructuring Support Agreement between Devonshire PGA Holdings, LLC and its affiliates (the "Debtors") and ELP West Palm, LLC as Senior Lender ("ELP") in the Debtors' Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases. The order approves the Debtors' assumption of the Restructuring Support Agreement effective upon entry of the order. The order also provides that the Restructuring Support Agreement is binding on the parties, modifies the automatic stay to allow termination of the agreement if applicable, and retains jurisdiction for the court to resolve any disputes regarding implementation of the order.
Cengage restructuring support agreementRandall Reese
This document is a declaration filed in support of Cengage Learning's chapter 11 bankruptcy petition and various first day motions. It provides background on Cengage Learning, describing its businesses, recent industry trends including a transition to digital formats, and events leading to its bankruptcy filing. The declaration was submitted by Cengage Learning's Chief Financial Officer to support the company's restructuring goals in chapter 11 and need for the relief requested in the first day motions.
Rural metro restructuring support agreement p2Randall Reese
The document appears to be a case filing with the title "Case 13-11952-KJC, Doc 69-3, Filed 08/07/13" that consists of 101 numbered pages without any other distinguishing content on each page.
1. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
·------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
In re:
Chapter 11
ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC.,
Case No. 12-'-[_ _,] (LJ)
Alleged Debtor.
--------------·---------------------------------------------------------------------------X
In re:
Chapter 11
ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.),
Case No. 12-._[_ __,] (LJ)
Alleged Debtor.
·------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x
STATEMENT OF PETITIONING CREDITORS IN SUPPORT
OF THE INVOLUNTARY CHAPTER 11 PETITIONS FILED AGAINST
ALLIED SYSTEMS HOLDINGS, INC. AND ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.)
The Petitioning Creditors 1 are lenders (in such capacity, the "Lenders") under the Credit
Agreements (as defined below), and respectfully submit this statement (i) in support of the
involuntary chapter 11 petitions filed against Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. ("Allied") and
Allied Systems, Ltd., (L.P.) ("Allied Systems", collectively, the "Alleged Debtors"), and (ii) to
assist the Court and other parties-in-interest in understanding the circumstances that led to the
filing of these involuntary petitions.
INTRODUCTION
The Petitioning Creditors are Lenders under the Credit Agreements (defined below),
pursuant to which the Alleged Debtors obtained approximately $315 million in financing when
they emerged from Chapter 11 in 2007 under the control of Yucaipa American Alliance Fund I,
1
The Petitioning Creditors are BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP, Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Ltd., and Spectrum
Investment Partners, L.P.
2. LP and Yucaipa American Alliance (Parallel) Fund I, LP (collectively, "Yucaipa")? Just over a
year after emerging from Chapter 11, however, Events of Default occurred under each of the
Credit Agreements as the financial condition of the Alleged Debtors and their business
operations deteriorated.
2
In re Allied Holdings, Inc. et al. Case No. 05-12515 (CRM) (Bankr. N.D. GA).
More particularly, the Alleged Debtors are party to each of the following:
(a) that certain Amended and Restated First Lien Secured Super-Priority Debtor in Possession and Exit Credit and
Guaranty Agreement dated as of March 30,2007 and amended and restated as of May 15,2007, and as further
amended, modified or supplemented through April 17, 2008 (including, without limitation, as set forth in
Amendment No.3 to Credit Agreement and Consent dated as of April 17, 2008), by and among Allied Holdings,
Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), as Borrowers, certain Subsidiaries of Borrowers, as Subsidiary Guarantors,
various Lenders, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Lead Arranger and Syndication Agent, and The CIT
Group/Business Credit, Inc. ("CIT'), as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, in the original principal amount
of$265,000,000 (the "First Lien Credit Agreement", a true and correct copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit
A), and
(b) that certain Second Lien Secured Super-Priority Debtor in Possession and Exit Credit and Guaranty Agreement
dated as of May 15,2007 (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time), by and among Allied
Holdings, Inc. and Allied Systems, Ltd. (L.P.), as Borrowers, certain Subsidiaries of Borrowers, as Subsidiary
Guarantors, various Lenders, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P ., as Lead Arranger and Syndication Agent,
Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, in the original principal amount of $50,000,000 (the "Second Lien
Credit Agreement", a true and correct copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit B) .The First Lien Credit
Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement are collectively referred to herein as the "Credit Agreements."
Capitalized terms used but not specifically defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the First Lien
Credit Agreement or the Second Lien Credit Agreement, as applicable.
2 REDACTED
3. The Alleged Debtors have admitted that these Events of Default have occurred and are
continuing under each of the Credit Agreements. The occurrence and continuance of these
Events of Default entitle the First Lien Lenders to accelerate the Obligations under each of the
Credit Agreements, and to exercise remedies.
As you would expect based upon the foregoing, the Alleged Debtors and their
subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis,
the
Alleged Debtors have been unable to pay, and thus have failed to pay, (a) interest and principal
payments to all First Lien Lenders in the aggregate amount of at least $57.4 million and (b)
interest payments to all Second Lien Lenders in the aggregate amount of at least $9.6 million in
3 REDACTED
4. each case since August 2009? The Alleged Debtors' failure to make these interest and principal
payments for more than two and one half years is dispositive evidence that Alleged Debtors are
not paying their debts as they become due. 4
In any other circumstance, given the substantial and continuing payment defaults and
other Events of Default that have been ongoing for several years, the First Lien Lenders would
long ago have instructed the Administrative Agent to accelerate the Obligations and commence
the exercise of remedies. In the present case, however, the Alleged Debtors, under Yucaipa's
control, engaged in a course of conduct with Yucaipa -- in direct violation of the terms of the
First Lien Credit Agreement -- designed to thwart the legitimate exercise of the rights of the First
Lien Lenders for the sole and exclusive benefit of Yucaipa. Through this course of conduct,
Yucaipa (with the Alleged Debtors' assistance) has hijacked control of the First Lien Credit
Agreement by purporting to acquire a majority of the First Lien Obligations and with it the
ability to control the Administrative Agent as "Requisite Lender." Yucaipa's efforts in this
regard, and the related litigation that they and the Alleged Debtors commenced against the
Administrative Agent, have effectively neutralized the Administrative Agent and stopped the
Lenders dead in their tracks from taking any actions to enforce the Obligations, notwithstanding
the substantial and admitted Events of Default (including payment defaults).
As the Petitioning Creditors will demonstrate, the Alleged Debtors are hopelessly
insolvent, unable to pay their debts as they become due (as evidenced by their failure to pay
interest for more than two and one-half years and their obvious inability to pay the First Lien
4 REDACTED
5. Obligations and Second Lien Obligations when they mature in May and September, 2012,
respectively), and in need of a financial restructuring that can only be accomplished through
bankruptcy. Despite the obvious financial distress of the Alleged Debtors, Allied's board of
directors (the "Allied Board"), in breach of its fiduciary duties, has refused to engage in
negotiations regarding a financial restructuring, and has instead chosen to engage (and continues
to engage) in conduct designed solely to benefit the controlling shareholder Yucaipa at the
expense of the Alleged Debtors' creditors, including the Petitioning Creditors. With financial
performance continuing to deteriorate, maturity dates for the First Lien Obligations and Second
Lien Obligations on the near term horizon, and no present ability to accelerate the Obligations or
direct the enforcement of remedies despite the numerous and material Events of Default that
occurred and are continuing, the Petitioning Creditors had no choice but to proceed with the
filing of the involuntary petitions.
STATEMENT IN SUPPORT
Allied is a provider of distribution and transportation services to the automotive industry,
specializing in the delivery of new vehicles from auto manufacturing plants to auto dealerships.
Allied and several related entities filed for Chapter II bankruptcy protection in July 2005.
Yucaipa's Control of Allied's Business
In May 2007, Allied emerged from bankruptcy pursuant to a plan of reorganization that
resulted in Yucaipa becoming the majority and controlling shareholder of Allied. Upon
information and belief, Yucaipa owns more than 70% of the common equity of Allied. As a
result of their controlling ownership interest, Yucaipa controls the Allied Board. Pursuant to
Allied's 2007 plan of reorganization, Yucaipa appointed four out of the five members of the
Allied Board. Yucaipa's ability to appoint the members of the Allied Board has enabled Yucaipa
5 REDACTED
6. to control Allied, including the right to appoint and direct the actions of senior management of
Allied.
The Credit Agreements
In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy in May 2007, Allied obtained an
aggregate of $315 million of financing through the First Lien Credit Agreement and the Second
Lien Credit Agreement. The Petitioning Creditors are Lenders under both the First Lien Credit
Agreement and the Second Lien Credit Agreement, and own or control, with power to vote, (a)
approximately $47.9 million (20%) in aggregate principal amount of First Lien Obligations, and
(b) approximately $5 million (17%) in aggregate principal amount of Second Lien Obligations.
As is typical for credit agreements of this type, the First Lien Credit Agreement, prior to
any amendments, contained an absolute prohibition against Yucaipa, as the majority and
controlling shareholder of Allied, from becoming a First Lien Lender. The purpose of this
prohibition was to assure that, as the owner of the Borrowers (Allied and Allied Systems),
Yucaipa could not interfere with the rights of, and decisions being made by, the First Lien
Lenders vis-a-vis the Borrower including (without limitation) declaring or waiving defaults, and
deciding when (or if) to exercise remedies. This prohibition was designed to prevent Yucaipa,
the controlling owner of the Borrower, from buying enough debt to be able to prevent the
Lenders from collecting on that debt or otherwise exercising their rights vis-a-vis the Borrower.
The Alleged Debtors' Events of Default
Just over a year after emerging from Chapter 11, the Events of Default described above
began to occur under each of the Credit Agreements. The Alleged Debtors have admitted that
these Events of Default have occurred and are continuing under each of the Credit Agreements.
The occurrence and continuance of these Events of Default entitle the First Lien Lenders to
6 REDACTED
7. accelerate the Obligations under each of the Credit Agreements, and to exercise remedies.
Yucaipa realized that the Alleged Debtors were in financial distress, and that the First
Lien Lenders could accelerate the Obligations and begin to enforce remedies. Such actions
would likely force the Alleged Debtors back into bankruptcy and result in a loss of Yucaipa's
substantial equity investment.
Yucaipa Obtains the Right to Become a Lender
under the Credit Agreement, with
Significant Restrictions on their Rights as Lender
Pursuant to this strategy, in addition to its status as majority shareholder of Allied and its
control over the Allied Board and day-to-day operations, Yucaipa sought to become a Lender
under the First Lien Credit Agreement. Section 10.6 of each Credit Agreement permitted
Lenders to sell, assign or transfer all or a portion of their rights and obligations under the
applicable Credit Agreement, but only to a party that satisfied the definition of "Eligible
Assignee." Under each of the Credit Agreements as originally drafted, the definition of Eligible
Assignee expressly excluded the Sponsor and affiliates of Allied. Yucaipa is specifically
designated as the "Sponsor" in each of the Credit Agreements. In addition, as majority
shareholder, Yucaipa is an affiliate of Allied.
Thus, unless the parties to the Credit Agreements consented to an amendment to the
definition of "Eligible Assignee," no Lender could sell, assig~ or transfer any of its rights or
obligations to Yucaipa and, consequently, Yucaipa could not become a Lender under either
Credit Agreement. Yucaipa and Allied requested and obtained Lender consent to that certain
Amendment No. 3 to Credit Agreement and Consent, dated as of April 17, 2008 (the 'Third
Amendment"), which amended the First Lien Credit Agreement to allow Yucaipa to become a
First Lien Lender and a Second Lien Lender, but only under strictly limited circumstances and
7 REDACTED
8. conditions. 5
That is, in the Third Amendment, to prevent Yucaipa, as the majority and controlling
owner of Allied, from harming the interests of the Lenders and undermining and interfering with
their rights and remedies against Allied, the Third Amendment placed significant restrictions and
conditions on any sale or assignment of Term Loans to Yucaipa (sales or assignments of the LC
Deposits and Revolving Loan were not permitted at all). Specifically, Yucaipa's potential status
as a First Lien Lender was subject to the following restrictions and conditions, among others, (i)
after giving effect to any such sale or assignment, Yucaipa could not hold or beneficially own
more than 25% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Term Loans, or acquire
more than $50 million in the aggregate of the principal amount of the Term Loans; (ii) Yucaipa
had to make capital contributions to Allied of at least 50% of the aggregate principal amount of
Term Loans it acquired; and (iii) Yucaipa would not have any voting rights with respect to any
Term Loans it might acquire (which other First Lien Lenders holding Term Loans would have),
including rights to consent to any amendment, modification, termination or waiver of any
provision of the First Lien Credit Agreement.
These restrictions and conditions served to ensure that Yucaipa, already a majority and
controlling shareholder of Allied, did not obtain unfettered control over Allied and injure or
destroy the Lenders' rights and interests by, among other things, becoming the Requisite Lender
under the First Lien Credit Agreement. Under the First Lien Credit Agreement, Requisite
Lender is defined to mean one or more Lenders that have or hold more than 50% of the sum of
the aggregate Term Loans, Revolving Loans and LC Facility. The Requisite Lender has the
authority to make certain key decisions affecting the rights of all Lenders under the First Lien
5
Pursuant to Amendment No.3, dated as of April 17, 2008, to the Second Lien Credit Agreement, Yucaipa was also
permitted to purchase Second Lien Obligations.
8 REDACTED
9. Credit Agreement, including the Petitioning Creditors, which includes the right to direct the
exercise of (or forbearance from exercise of) remedies such as demanding payment by Allied of
any and all amounts due, or commencing foreclosure on the collateral pledged to secure the
Obligations.
Pursuant to the Third Amendment, the effect of the prohibitions imposed on Yucaipa's
ability to acquire and vote Term Loans and other Obligations was to preclude Yucaipa from ever
becoming the Requisite Lender. Consequently, because Yucaipa had no ability to become the
Requisite Lender under the Credit Agreements, it could not as majority and controlling owner of
Allied, harm the interests of the Petitioning Creditors and other Lenders, or otherwise interfere
with the Lenders' rights. In the Third Amendment, Yucaipa acknowledged that as "Restricted
Sponsor Affiliate" its breach of the Third Amendment "will cause the other Lenders and Agents
to sustain damages for which they would not have an adequate remedy at law for money
damages" and further agreed that "specific performance of such covenants and agreements"
contained in the Third Amendment would be the appropriate remedy.
The Forbearance Agreement and The Failed Tender Offer
Given the occurrence and continuance of Events of Default, on or about September 24,
2008, Allied entered into a forbearance agreement with the First Lien Agent and First Lien
Lenders pursuant to which the First Lien Lenders agreed to refrain from taking action to enforce
their rights under the First Lien Credit Agreement so that the parties could engage in discussions
regarding a restructuring of Allied's debt. Those discussions ultimately proved unsuccessful.
In February 2009, Yucaipa launched a tender offer to purchase Obligations from the First
Lien Lenders at a substantial discount to par. The tender offer was conditioned upon acceptance
and consent by First Lien Lenders constituting Requisite Lenders to an amendment to the First
9 REDACTED
10. Lien Credit Agreement that would have eliminated all of the restrictions and conditions imposed
upon Yucaipa's ownership of Obligations as set forth in the Third Amendment. Yucaipa's
tender offer failed, as Yucaipa did not receive a sufficient number of acceptances to amend the
First Lien Credit Agreement in the manner needed.
Yucaipa, with the Assistance of Alleged
Debtors, Violates the First Lien Credit Agreement;
The Purported Fourth Amendment
With the lapse of the forbearance period, the failure of the tender offer, the continuing
Defaults and Events of Default by Allied (including, but not limited to, the failure to pay interest
and principal), and the continued deterioration in Allied's business, Yucaipa was determined to
protect its investment at any cost. In order to do so, Yucaipa sought to ensure that the First Lien
Lenders could not accelerate the Obligations or exercise remedies. The only way to do that was
to gain control of the First Lien Obligations, which the First Lien Credit Agreement (as amended
through the Third Amendment) specifically prohibited. To that end, Yucaipa, with Allied's
assistance, intentionally violated the negotiated restrictions of the Third Amendment in order to
prevent the First Lien Lenders from declaring the Obligations to be immediately due and
payable, exercising their rights and remedies against the Alleged Debtors, and otherwise seeking
to collect on the Obligations.
After the First Lien Lenders refused to accept Yucaipa's tender offer, Yucaipa entered
into direct discussions with ComVest Investment Partners III ("ComVest") to purchase the Term
Loans and LC Facility Obligations then held by ComVest, which at the time comprised a
majority of the Term Loans, Revolving Loans and aggregate LC Exposure Obligations then
outstanding. 6 In connection therewith, Yucaipa caused Allied to enter into a purported
6
At the time, given the magnitude of its holdings, Com Vest was the Requisite Lender under the First Lien Credit
Agreement.
10 REDACTED
11. amendment to First Lien Credit Agreement with ComVest, dated as of August 21, 2009 (the
"Purported Fourth Amendment"). 7 The Purported Fourth Amendment committed Allied to
various unfair, wasteful provisions, notwithstanding that, at the time of the documentation of the
above-described arrangements, Allied was unable to attest either to its solvency or to the absence
of any material adverse change in its business. Allied received no consideration for its
agreement to the Purported Fourth Amendment.
More importantly, the Purported Fourth Amendment, which was executed without the
consent of the Lenders, or the Administrative Agent, deletes every restriction and condition in
the Third Amendment relating to Yucaipa acquiring and voting Obligations, and that prevented
Yucaipa from interfering with the exercise of Lender rights.
The Purported Fourth Amendment further allowed Yucaipa to enter into an Assignment
and Assumption Agreement with ComVest, dated August 21, 2009 (the "ComVest
Assignment"), pursuant to which ComVest assigned its interest in $114.7 million of Term Loans
(constituting more than 65% of the aggregate Term Loan Exposure), and $30.4 million of LC
Exposure (constituting more than 60% of the aggregate LC Exposure) to Yucaipa, well in excess
of the express limitations imposed by the Third Amendment. 8
By virtue of the Purported Fourth Amendment, Yucaipa not only claims to have no
restrictions on its ability to acquire Obligations under the First Lien Credit Agreement and to
vote those Obligations, Yucaipa also asserts that it constitutes a "Requisite Lender." Under the
First Lien Credit Agreement, a Requisite Lender has broad authority to make certain decisions
7
The Petitioning Creditors dispute the validity, enforceability and effectiveness of the Purported Fourth
Amendment, as well as any transaction or event taken in reliance thereon.
8
Upon information and belief, Yucaipa negotiated the purchase of the Obligations held by ComVest and, in
connection therewith, choreographed the execution ofthe Purported Fourth Amendment by ComVest and Yucaipa's
controlled affiliate Allied.
11 REDACTED
12. affecting the rights of all First Lien Lenders, including the Petitioning Creditors. Those rights
include:
• The ability to direct the Administrative Agent to act (or not act) upon the
occurrence and during the continuance of an Event of Default.
• To direct the Administrative Agent to accelerate (or not accelerate) the
Obligations when Allied fails to pay interest or principal when due and to
exercise (or not exercise) remedies to obtain payment of the Obligations.
Acting under its alleged status as the Requisite Lender, Yucaipa has prevented the
Administrative Agent from taking any actions on behalf of the First Lien Lenders to accelerate
the Obligations or exercise remedies despite the fact that Allied has admitted to the occurrence
and continuance of Defaults and Events of Default for more than three years, including the
failure to pay more than $67 millions of dollars of interest and principal on the First Lien Loan
and Second Lien Loan.
Upon consummation of the ComVest Assigmnent, Yucaipa, which by then already
controlled Allied through (a) ownership of the majority of Allied's common and preferred equity,
(b) its appointment of a majority of the Allied Board, including Derex Walker, its chairman, and
(c) its control of Allied's management, announced that it had acquired a majority of the
Obligations under the First Lien Credit Agreement by virtue of the acquisition from ComVest
and the Purported Fourth Amendment, despite the clear and unequivocal restrictions on such
ownership contained in the Third Amendment. Allied's actions in executing the Purported
Fourth Amendment -- at Yucaipa's direction -- were undertaken solely to protect Yucaipa's
investment in Allied at the expense of the First Lien Lenders and to interfere with or destroy the
rights of the First Lien Lenders. 9
9
On September 18, 2009, the Petitioning Creditors sent the letter annexed hereto as Exhibit C to counsel for the
Administrative Agent raising doubts about the validity ofYucaipa's entitlement to act as Requisite Lender and
12 REDACTED
13. Prepetition Litigation
The Administrative Agent, initially refused to acknowledge the validity of the Purported
Fourth Amendment or Yucaipa's alleged status as the Requisite Lender. Because of the
Administrative Agent's refusal, on November 13, 2009, Yucaipa and Allied (Yucaipa's
controlled affiliate) commenced an action against CIT Group/Business Credit, Inc. in the
Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, inter alia, (a) alleging breach of the First Lien Credit
Agreement, (b) seeking a declaration that the Purported Fourth Amendment was effective and
binding on the parties to the First Lien Credit Agreement, and (c) seeking a declaration that
Yucaipa was the Requisite Lender under the First Lien Credit Agreement (the "Georgia
Action"). 10 On December 21, 2009, CIT filed a verified answer and counterclaims against
Yucaipa and Allied seeking a declaration that the Purported Fourth Amendment was ineffective
and not binding, that Yucaipa was not the Requisite Lender, and other relief ("CIT
Counterclaim"). 11
Notwithstanding the positions set forth in the CIT Counterclaim, CIT ultimately
acquiesced in Yucaipa's flagrant breach of the First Lien Credit Agreement. On December 5,
2011, without notice to or consultation with the Petitioning Creditors, the parties to the Georgia
Action entered into a settlement agreement (the "Settlement Agreement") 12 pursuant to which
CIT agreed not to "object to, challenge or contest, either directly or indirectly, the validity of the
Fourth Amendment," and acknowledged "that Yucaipa is the Requisite Lender for all purposes
recommending that the Administrative Agent disregard directions from Yucaipa in its purported capacity as
Requisite Lender.
10
A true and correct copy ofthe Complaint is annexed hereto as Exhibit D.
11
A true and correct copy ofthe CIT Counterclaim is annexed hereto as Exhibit E.
12
A true and correct copy of the Settlement Agreement is annexed hereto as Exhibit F. See Exhibit F, 1[10.
13 REDACTED
14. including the exercise of remedies." (Exhibit F) 13 • As consideration for CIT's acquiescence to
the settlement, Yucaipa, among other things, agreed to fully indemnify CIT from claims brought
against CIT by third parties, such as the Lenders, arising from CIT's agreement to enter the
settlement agreement. 14
As a result of the foregoing, Yucaipa not only has control over the Alleged Debtors (the
Borrower) through its majority and controlling ownership interest in the Alleged Debtors and
control of the Allied Board, but it also purports to have control over all decisions affecting all
Lenders (as the purported Requisite Lender), including the ability to prevent the Lenders from
exercising their rights and remedies against the Alleged Debtors (including, without limitation,
upon the Maturity Date of the Obligations).
The Petitioning Creditors have attempted to protect their interests by commencing an
action against Yucaipa on January 17,2012 in the Supreme Court of New York County, New
York, seeking a declaration that the Purported Fourth Amendment is invalid, ineffective and not
binding, and that Yucaipa is not the Requisite Lender under the First Lien Credit Agreement (the
"New York Action"). On March 23,2012, Yucaipa filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that
the Settlement Agreement by CIT bars the New York Action under the doctrine of res judicata.
13
The Settlement Agreement was signed by CIT solely in its capacity as a Lender and not in its capacity as
Administrative Agent. (See id., at 1!12.).
14
Yucaipa also agreed to acknowledge the seniority of the Revolving Loans owed to CIT by Allied to the
Obligations represented to the Term Loans (which are the Obligations held by the Petitioning Creditors), dismiss the
Georgia Action and released CIT, as well as other consideration. (See id. ).
14 REDACTED
16. The Petitioning Creditors' Efforts to Engage
the Alleged Debtors in Restructuring Negotiations
Despite ongoing Defaults and Events of Default -- including the failure to make interest
and principal payments for more than two and one-half years -- and the commencement of the
New York Action, the Petitioning Creditors attempted to engage the Alleged Debtors in
restructuring negotiations. These attempts were met with a perfunctory response declining to
address the substantive issues raised by the Petitioning Creditors or to engage them in
restructuring discussions.
16 REDACTED
17. CONCLUSION
In light of the undeniable occurrence and continuing Events of Default and faced with the
inability to preserve and protect their rights under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the
Petitioning Creditors reluctantly concluded that they had no choice but to commence these
involuntary Chapter 11 cases. The Petitioning Creditors believe that the Chapter 11 process will
preserve the Alleged Debtors' value, and assure an orderly restructuring and hopefully a speedy
emergence from bankruptcy. In light of all that has transpired, the Petitioning Creditors arrived
at the rational conclusion that involuntary Chapter 11 cases were the only means to break the
apparent impasse caused by Yucaipa and the directors and officers of the Alleged Debtors who
have disregarded their fiduciary duties.
Dated: May 17, 2012 LANDIS RATH & COBB LLP
Wilmington, Delaware
By: [0;; !;/~{
AdainG. Landis (No. 3407)
Kerri K. Mumford (No. 4186)
919 Market Street, Suite 1800
Wilmington, Delaware 19899
Telephone: (302) 467-4400
Facsimile: (302) 467-4500
-and-
Adam C. Harris
Robert J. Ward
Victoria A. Lepore
SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
Telephone: (212) 756-2000
Facsimile: (212) 593-5955
Attorneys for BDCM Opportunity Fund II, LP,
Black Diamond CLO 2005-1 Ltd, and
Spectrum Investment Partners, L.P.
17
19. EXECUTION VERSION
AMENDED AND RESTATED FIRST LIEN
SECURED SUPER-PRIORITY DEBTOR IN POSSESSION
AND EXIT CREDIT AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT
dated as of March 30, 2007
and
amended and restated as of May 15, 2007
among
ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC.
and
ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.),
as Borrowers
CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES OF
ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC.
and
ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.),
as Guarantors,
VARIOUS LENDERS,
GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.,
as Lead Arranger and Syndication Agent,
and
THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.,
as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent
$265,000,000 Senior Secured First Priority Credit Facilities
20. TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION ............................................................ 2
1.1 Definitions ................................................................................................................ 2
1.2 Accounting Terms .................................................................................................. 46
1.3 Interpretation, etc ................................................................................................... 4 7
SECTION 2. LOANS AND LETTERS OF CREDIT ................................................................ .47
2.1 Term Loans ............................................................................................................ 47
2.2 Revolving Loans .................................................................................................... 49
2.3 Swing Line Loans .................................................................................................. 50
2.4 Issuance ofLetters of Credit and Purchase ofParticipations Therein ................... 52
2.5 Pro Rata Shares; Availability of Funds .................................................................. 60
2.6 Use of Proceeds ...................................................................................................... 61
2.7 Evidence ofDebt; Register; Lenders' Books and Records; Notes ......................... 61
2.8 Interest on Loans .................................................................................................... 62
2.9 Conversion/Continuation ....................................................................................... 65
2.10 Default Interest. ...................................................................................................... 65
2.11 Fees ........................................................................................................................ 66
2.12 Scheduled Payments .............................................................................................. 67
2.13 Voluntary Prepayments/Commitment Reductions; Call Protection ...................... 67
2.14 Mandatory Prepayments ........................................................................................ 69
2.15 Application ofPrepayments ................................................................................... 71
2.16 General Provisions Regarding Payments ............................................................... 72
2.17 Ratable Sharing ...................................................................................................... 73
2.18 Making or Maintaining Eurodollar Rate Loans ..................................................... 74
2.19 Increased Costs; Capital Adequacy ....................................................................... 76
2.20 Taxes; Withholding, etc ......................................................................................... 77
2.21 Obligation to Mitigate ............................................................................................ 79
2.22 Defaulting Lenders ................................................................................................. 80
2.23 Removal or Replacement of a Lender ................................................................... 81
2.24 Super-Priority Nature of Obligations and Lenders' Liens ..................................... 82
2.25 Payment of Obligations .......................................................................................... 83
2.26 No Discharge; Survival of Claims ......................................................................... 83
2.27 Waiver of any Priming Rights ............................................................................... 83
2.28 Co-Borrowers ......................................................................................................... 83
2.29 Judgment Currency ................................................................................................ 85
SECTION 3. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT AND CONVERSION TO EXIT
FACILITIES .......................................................................................................... 86
3.1 Closing Date ........................................................................................................... 86
3.2 Conditions to Each Credit Extension ..................................................................... 90
3.3 Exit Facilities Option ............................................................................................. 91
22. 5.16 Canadian Supplemental Final Order .................................................................... 118
5.17 Restructuring Advisers ........................................................................................ 118
5.18 Intentionally Omitted ........................................................................................... 118
SECTION 6. NEGATIVE COVENANTS ........................................................................ .,., .. 118
6.1 Indebtedness ......................................................................................................... 119
6.2 Liens ..................................................................................................................... 123
6.3 No Further Negative Pledges ............................................................................... 126
6.4 Restricted Junior Payments .................................................................................. 126
6.5 Restrictions on Subsidiary Distributions ............................................................. 127
6.6 Investments .......................................................................................................... 127
6.7 Financial Covenants ............................................................................................. 129
6.8 Fundamental Changes; Disposition of Assets; Acquisitions ............................... 132
6.9 Disposal of Subsidiary Interests ........................................................................... 134
6.10 Sales and Lease-Backs ......................................................................................... 135
6.11 Transactions with Shareholders and Affiliates .................................................... 135
6.12 Conduct ofBusiness ............................................................................................ 135
6.13 Amendments or Waivers of Organizational Documents and Certain
Agreements .......................................................................................................... 136
6.14 Haul Insurance ..................................................................................................... 13 6
6.15 Chapter 11 Claims; Adequate Protection ............................................................ .l36
6.16 DIP Orders and Canadian Orders ........................................................................ 136
6.17 Limitation on Prepayments ofPre-Petition Obligations ...................................... 136
6.18 Fiscal Year ........................................................................................................... 137
6.19 Repayment of Indebtedness ................................................................................. 137
6.20 Reclamation Claims ............................................................................................. 13 7
6.21 Chapter 11 Claims ................................................................................................ 137
6.22 Limitation on Voluntary Payments and Amendments or Waivers of the
Second Lien Credit Agreement. ........................................................................... 137
SECTION?. GUARANTY ....................................................................................................... 138
7.1 Guaranty of the Obligations ................................................................................. 138
7.2 Contribution by Guarantors ................................................................................. 138
7.3 Payment by Guarantors ........................................................................................ 139
7.4 Liability of Guarantors Absolute ......................................................................... 139
7.5 Waivers by Guarantors ........................................................................................ 141
7.6 Guarantors' Rights of Subrogation, Contribution, etc .......................................... 142
7.7 Subordination of Other Obligations ..................................................................... 142
7.8 Continuing Guaranty ............................................................................................ 143
7.9 Authority of Guarantors or Borrowers ................................................................. 143
7.10 Financial Condition ofBorrowers ....................................................................... 143
7.11 Bankruptcy, etc .................................................................................................... 143
7.12 Discharge of Guaranty Upon Sale of Guarantor. ................................................. 144
SECTION 8. EVENTS OF DEFAULT; CARVE-OUT EVENT .............................................. 144
8.1 Events of Default ................................................................................................. 144
8.2 Carve-Out Events ................................................................................................. 150
Ill
23. SECTION9. AGENTS .............................................................................................................. 150
9.1 Appointment of Agents ........................................................................................ 150
9.2 Powers and Duties ................................................................................................ I 51
9.3 General Immunity ................................................................................................ 151
9.4 Agents Entitled to Act as Lender ......................................................................... 153
9.5 Lenders' Representations, Warranties and Acknowledgment.. ............................ 153
9.6 Right to Indemnity ............................................................................................... 153
9.7 Successor Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent and Swing Line Lender. ...... 154
9.8 Collateral Documents and Guaranty.................................................................... 155
SECTION 10. MISCELLANEOUS ............................................................................................ 156
10.1 Notices ................................................................................................................. 156
10.2 Expenses .............................................................................................................. 158
10.3 Indemnity ............................................................................................................. 158
10.4 Set-Off. ................................................................................................................. 159
10.5 Amendments and Waivers ................................................................................... 159
10.6 Successors and Assigns; Participations ............................................................... 163
10.7 Independence of Covenants ................................................................................. 167
10.8 Survival ofRepresentations, Warranties and Agreements ................................. .167
10.9 No Waiver; Remedies Cumulative ...................................................................... 167
10.10 Marshalling; Payments Set Aside ........................................................................ 167
10.11 Severability .......................................................................................................... 168
10.12 Obligations Several; Independent Nature of Lenders' Rights ............................. .168
10.I3 Headings .............................................................................................................. 168
IO.I4 APPLICABLE LAW ........................................................................................... I68
10.I5 CONSENT TO JURISDICTION ......................................................................... l68
10.16 WANER OF JURY TRIAL. ............................................................................... 169
I O.I7 Confidentiality ..................................................................................................... 169
1O.I8 Usury Savings Clause .......................................................................................... 170
10.19 Counterparts ......................................................................................................... 171
10.20 Effectiveness ........................................................................................................ 17I
I 0.21 Patriot Act ............................................................................................................ 171
10.22 Electronic Execution of Assignments ................................................................. .17I
10.23 Post-Closing Actions ........................................................................................... 172
10.24 Joint and Several Liability ................................................................................... 172
10.25 Limitations Act, 2002 .......................................................................................... 172
10.26 Effect ofRestatement ........................................................................................... 172
IV
24. APPENDICES: A-1 Term Loan Commitments
A-2 LC Commitments
A-3 Revolving Commitments
8 Notice Addresses
SCHEDULES: 4.1 Jurisdictions of Organization and Qualification
4.2 Equity Interests and Ownership
4.7 Contingent Liabilities
4.13 Real Estate Assets
4.16 Material Contracts
4.19 Employee Matters
4.20 Employee Benefit Plans
4.25 Post-petition Liens
6.1 Certain Indebtedness
6.2 Certain Liens
6.5 Certain Restrictions on Subsidiary Distributions
6.6 Certain Investments
6.8(a) Planned Asset Sales
6.8(b) Restructuring Asset Sales
6.11 Certain Affiliate Transactions
10.23 Post-Closing Actions
EXHIBITS: A-1 Funding Notice
A-2 Conversion/Continuation Notice
A-3 Issuance Notice
B-1 Term Loan Note
B-2 Revolving Loan Note
B-3 Swing Line Note
c Compliance Certificate
D [Intentionally Omitted]
E Assignment Agreement
F Certificate Re Non-bank Status
G-1 Closing Date Certificate
G-2 Solvency Certificate
H Counterpart Agreement
I Pledge and Security Agreement
J Mortgage
K Landlord Waiver and Consent Agreement
L Intercompany Note
M Interim Supplemental DIP Order
N Canadian Pledge and Security Agreement
0 Affirmation Agreement
v
25. AMENDED AND RESTATED FIRST LIEN
SECURED SUPER-PRIORITY DEBTOR IN POSSESSION
AND EXIT CREDIT AND GUARANTY AGREEMENT
This AMENDED AND RESTATED FIRST LIEN SECURED SUPER-
PRIORITY DEBTOR IN POSSESSION AND EXIT CREDIT AND GUARANTY
AGREEMENT, dated as of March 30, 2007, and amended and restated as of May 15, 2007, is
entered into by and among ALLIED HOLDINGS, INC., a Georgia corporation and a debtor and
debtor in possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (as defined below) ("Holdings"),
ALLIED SYSTEMS, LTD. (L.P.), a Georgia limited partnership and a debtor and debtor in
possession under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code ("Systems" and, together with Holdings,
the "Borrowers"), CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES OF BORROWERS, as Subsidiary Guarantors,
the Lenders party hereto from time to time, GOLDMAN SACHS CREDIT PARTNERS L.P.
("GSCP"), as Syndication Agent (in such capacity, "Syndication Agent"), and THE CIT
GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. ("CIT"), as Administrative Agent (together with its
permitted successors in such capacity, "Administrative Agent") and as Collateral Agent
(together with its permitted successor in such capacity, "Collateral Agent").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, capitalized terms used in these Recitals shall have the respective
meanings set forth for such terms in Section 1.1 hereof;
WHEREAS, on July 31, 2005 (the "Petition Date"), Borrowers and each of the
other Debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief (collectively, the "Cases") under Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code with the Bankruptcy Court, which Cases have been recognized in Canada
pursuant to the Canadian Stay Order;
WHEREAS, from and after the Petition Date, Debtors are continuing to operate
their respective businesses and manage their respective properties as debtors in possession under
Sections 1107 and 11 08 of the Bankruptcy Code;
WHEREAS, Borrowers and the Agents and the Lenders party thereto previously
entered into the Secured Super-Priority Debtor in Possession and Exit Credit and Guaranty
Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2007 (the "Existing Credit Agreement"), as amended, under
which the Lenders extended to Borrowers certain credit facilities (the "Existing Credit
Facilities") consisting of $230,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Term Loans (the
"Existing Term Loans"), $35,000,000 aggregate principal amount of Revolving Commitments
and $50,000,000 aggregate principal amount of LC Commitments;
26. WHEREAS, Borrowers will refinance a portion of the Existing Term Loans with
the proceeds of a new second lien term loan in an aggregate principal amount equal to
$50,000,000 under a new Second Lien Secured Super-Priority Debtor in Possession and Exit
Credit and Guaranty Agreement dated as of May 15, 2007;
WHEREAS, Borrowers have agreed to secure all of their Obligations by granting
to Collateral Agent, for the benefit of Secured Parties, a First Priority Lien on substantially all of
their assets, including a pledge of all of the Equity Interests of each of their respective Domestic
Subsidiaries, 100% of all the Equity Interests of each of their Canadian Subsidiaries and 65% of
all the Equity Interests of each of their other respective first-tier Foreign Subsidiaries;
WHEREAS, Guarantors have agreed to guarantee the obligations of Borrowers
hereunder and to secure their respective Obligations by granting to Collateral Agent, for the
benefit of Secured Parties, a First Priority Lien on substantially all of their respective assets,
including a pledge of all of the Equity Interests of each of their respective Domestic Subsidiaries
(including Systems), 100% of all the Equity Interests of each of their respective Canadian
Subsidiaries and 65% of all the Equity Interests of each of their other respective directly owned
Foreign Subsidiaries; and
WHEREAS, the Lenders have agreed to grant an option to Borrowers to cause
the Credit Facilities to be converted to the Exit Facilities subject to certain terms and conditions
set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the agreements,
provisions and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
1.1 Definitions. The following terms used herein, including in the preamble, recitals,
exhibits and schedules hereto, shall have the following meanings:
"Act" as defined in Section 3.1(r).
"Adjusted Eurodollar Rate" means, for any Interest Rate Determination Date
with respect to an Interest Period for a Eurodollar Rate Loan, the rate per annum obtained by
dividing (and rounding upward to the next whole multiple of 1/16 of 1%) (i) (a) the rate per
annum (rounded to the nearest 1/100 of 1%) equal to the rate determined by Administrative
Agent to be the offered rate which appears on the page of the Telerate Screen which displays an
average British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rate (such page currently being page
number 3740 or 3750, as applicable) for deposits (for delivery on the first day of such period)
with a term equivalent to such period in Dollars, determined as of approximately 11 :00 a.m.
2
27. (London, England time) on such Interest Rate Determination Date, or (b) in the event the rate
referenced in the preceding clause (a) does not appear on such page or service or if such page or
service shall cease to be available, the rate per annum (rounded to the nearest 1/100 of I%) equal
to the rate determined by Administrative Agent to be the offered rate on such other page or other
service which displays an average British Bankers Association Interest Settlement Rate for
deposits (for delivery on the first day of such period) with a term equivalent to such period in
Dollars, determined as of approximately 11:00 a.m. (London, England time) on such Interest
Rate Determination Date, or (c) in the event the rates referenced in the preceding clauses (a) and
(b) are not available, the rate per annum (rounded to the nearest 11100 of 1%) equal to the
offered quotation rate to first class banks in the London interbank market by Deutsche Bank for
deposits (for delivery on the first day of the relevant period) in Dollars of amounts in same day
funds comparable to the principal amount of the applicable Loan of Administrative Agent, in its
capacity as a Lender, for which the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate is then being determined with
maturities comparable to such period as of approximately 11:00 a.m. (London, England time) on
such Interest Rate Determination Date, by (ii) an amount equal to (a) one minus (b) the
Applicable Reserve Requirement.
"Administrative Agent" as defined in the preamble hereto.
"Adverse Proceeding" means any action, suit, proceeding, hearing (whether
administrative, judicial or otherwise), governmental investigation or arbitration (whether or not
purportedly on behalf of Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries) at law or in equity, or before or by
any Governmental Authority, domestic or foreign (including any Environmental Claims),
whether pending or, to the knowledge of Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries, threatened against
or affecting Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries or any property of Holdings or any of its
Subsidiaries.
"Affected Lender" as defined in Section 2.18(b).
"Affected Loans" as defined in Section 2.18(b ).
"Affiliate" means, as applied to any Person, any other Person directly or
indirectly controlling, controlled by, or under common control with, that Person. For the
purposes of this definition, "control" (including, with correlative meanings, the terms
"controlling", "controlled by" and "under common control with"), as applied to any Person,
means the possession, directly or indirectly, of the power (i) to vote 5% or more (or, for purposes
of the definition of "Controlled Investment Affiliate", 50% or more) of the Securities having
ordinary voting power for the election of directors of such Person or (ii) to direct or cause the
direction of the management and policies of that Person, whether through the ownership of
voting securities or by contract or otherwise.
3
28. "Affirmation Agreement" shall mean the Affirmation Agreement substantially in
the form ofExhibit 0 hereto.
"Agent" means each of Administrative Agent, Syndication Agent and Collateral
Agent.
"Agent Affiliates" as defined in Section 10.1 (b )(iii).
"Aggregate Amounts Due" as defined in Section 2.17.
"Aggregate Payments" as defined in Section 7.2.
"Agreement" means this Amended and Restated First Lien Secured Super-
Priority Debtor in Possession and Exit Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 30,
2007, and amended and restated as of May 15, 2007, as it may be amended, supplemented or
otherwise modified from time to time.
"AH Industries" means AH Industries Inc., an Alberta corporation.
"Applicable Reserve Requirement" means, at any time, for any Eurodollar Rate
Loan, the maximum rate, expressed as a decimal, at which reserves (including any basic
marginal, special, supplemental, emergency or other reserves) are required to be maintained with
respect thereto against "Eurocurrency liabilities" (as such tem1 is defined in Regulation D) under
regulations issued from time to time by the Board of Governors or other applicable banking
regulator. Without limiting the effect of the foregoing, the Applicable Reserve Requirement
shall reflect any other reserves required to be maintained by such member banks with respect to
(i) any category of liabilities which includes deposits by reference to which the applicable
Adjusted Eurodollar Rate or any other interest rate of a Loan is to be determined, or (ii) any
category of extensions of credit or other assets which include Eurodollar Rate Loans. A
Eurodollar Rate Loan shall be deemed to constitute Eurocurrency liabilities and as such shall be
deemed subject to reserve requirements without benefits of credit for proration, exceptions or
offsets that may be available from time to time to the applicable Lender. The rate of interest on
Eurodollar Rate Loans shall be adjusted automatically on and as of the effective date of any
change in the Applicable Reserve Requirement.
"Approved Electronic Communications" means any notice, demand,
communication, infunnalion, document or other material that any Credit Party provides to
Administrative Agent pursuant to any Credit Document or the transactions contemplated therein
which is distributed to the Agents or to the lenders by means of electronic communications
pursuant to Section 10.1 (b).
4
29. "Asset Sale" means a sale, lease or sub-lease (as lessor or sublessor), sale and
leaseback, assignment, conveyance, exclusive license (as licensor or sublicensor), transfer or
other disposition to, or any exchange of property with, any Person (other than Borrower or any
Guarantor Subsidiary), in one transaction or a series of transactions, of all or any part of
Holdings' or any of its Subsidiaries' businesses, assets or properties of any kind, whether real,
personal, or mixed and whether tangible or intangible, whether now owned or hereafter acquired,
leased or licensed, including the Equity Interests of any of Holdings' Subsidiaries, other than (i)
inventory (or other assets) sold, leased or licensed out in the ordinary course of business
(excluding any such sales, leases or licenses out by operations or divisions discontinued or to be
discontinued), (ii) sales or other dispositions of obsolete or worn out rigs and (iii) sales, leases or
licenses out of other assets for aggregate consideration of less than $500,000 with respect to any
transaction or series of related transactions and less than $1,000,000 in the aggregate during any
Fiscal Year.
"Assignment Agreement" means an Assignment and Assumption Agreement
substantially in the form of Exhibit E, with such amendments or modifications as may be
approved by Administrative Agent.
"Assignment Effective Date" as defined in Section 10.6(b).
"Authorized Officer" means, as applied to any Person, any individual holding
the position of chairman of the board (if an officer), chief executive officer, president or one of
its vice presidents (or the equivalent thereof), and such Person's chief financial officer, controller,
assistant controller, treasurer or assistant treasurer.
"Bankruptcy Code" means Title 11 of the United States Code entitled "Bank-
ruptcy," as now and hereafter in effect, or any successor statute; provided, however, that, with
respect to the Cases, "Bankruptcy Code" means Title 11 of the United States Code, as in effect
on the Petition Date and as thereafter amended, if such amendments are made applicable to the
Cases.
"Bankruptcy Court" means the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Georgia or any other court having competent jurisdiction over the Cases.
"Base Fiscal Year" as defined in Section 6.7(c).
"Base Rate" means, for any day, a rate per annum equal to the greater of (i) the
Prime Rate in effect on such day and (ii) the Federal Funds Effective Rate in effect on such day
plus Y:! of 1%. Any change in the Base Rate due to a change in the Prime Rate or the Federal
Funds Effective Rate shall be effective on the effective day of such change in the Prime Rate or
the Federal Funds Effective Rate, respectively.
5
30. "Base Rate Loan" means a Loan bearing interest at a rate detennined by
reference to the Base Rate.
"Benchmark LIBOR Rate" as defined in Section 2.4(m).
"Beneficiary" means each Agent, Issuing Bank, Lender and Lender Counterparty.
"BIA'' means the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada), as now or hereafter in
effect or any successor statute.
"Blue Thunder" means Blue Thunder Auto Transport, Inc. or any of its
Subsidiaries or Affiliates.
"Blue Thunder Equipment" means rigs (including tractors, trailers and related
equipment) purchased from Blue Thunder or any auctioneer acting on behalf of Blue Thunder
and any replacement parts or improvements made thereto.
"Board of Governors" means the Board of Governors of the United States
Federal Reserve System, or any successor thereto.
"Borrowers" as defined in the preamble hereto.
"Business Day" means (i) any day excluding Saturday, Sunday and any day
which is a legal holiday under the laws of the State of New York or is a day on which banking
institutions located in such state are authorized or required by law or other governmental action
to close and (ii) with respect to all notices, determinations, fundings and payments in connection
with the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate or any Eurodollar Rate Loans, the term "Business Day" shall
mean any day which is a Business Day described in clause (i) and which is also a day for trading
by and between banks in Dollar deposits in the London interbank market.
"Canadian Court" means the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial
List).
"Canadian Confirmation Order" means an order of the Canadian Court under
Section 18.6 of the CCAA, together with all extensions, modifications and amendments thereto,
in each case in form and substance satisfactory to Agents, giving full effect to the Confirmation
Order, which order shall specifically but not exclusively confirm the Plan and approve and
authorize the transactions contemplated thereby and the granting of liens under the Credit
6
31. Documents and containing a release in favor of Administrative Agent and Syndication Agent and
the Lenders and their respective affiliates.
"Canadian Credit Party" means any Credit Party incorporated, organized or
otherwise established under the laws of Canada or any political subdivision of Canada.
"Canadian DIP Order" means the Canadian Interim Order or the Canadian Final
Order, as applicable.
"Canadian Final Order" means the order entitled "In the Matter of Section 18.6
of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 and in the matter of Allied
Holdings and those subsidiaries listed on Schedule A hereto" entered by the Canadian Court on
April 16, 2007, as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified by the Canadian Supplemental
Interim Order and Canadian Supplemental Final Order.
"Canadian Insolvency Law" shall mean any of the BIA and the CCAA, and any
other applicable insolvency or other similar law.
"Canadian Interim Order" means the order entitled "In the Matter of Section
18.6 of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36 and in the matter of
Allied Holdings and those subsidiaries listed on Schedule A hereto" entered by the Canadian
Court on March 29, 2007, as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified by the Canadian
Supplemental Interim Order and Canadian Supplemental Final Order.
"Canadian Pledge and Security Agreement" means the Pledge and Security
Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2007, executed by each Canadian Credit Party, as it may be
amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time.
"Canadian PPSA" means the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario) and the
Regulations thereunder, as from time to time in effect, provided, however, if the validity,
perfection (or opposability), effect of perfection or of non-perfection or priority of Collateral
Agent's security interest in any Collateral are governed by the personal property security laws or
laws relating to movable property of any jurisdiction other than Ontario, Canadian PPSA shall
mean those personal property security laws or laws relating to movable property in such other
jurisdiction for the purpose of the provisions hereof relating to such validity, perfection (or
opposability), effect of perfection or of non-perfection or priority and for the definitions related
to such provisions.
"Canadian Stay Order" means, collectively, the order of the Canadian Court
entered on August 5, 2005 under Section 18.6 of the CCAA, together with all extensions,
modifications and amendments thereto, in. each case in form and substance reasonably
7
32. satisfactory to the Agent, which, among other matters but not by way of limitation, recognizes
the Cases and imposes a stay of proceedings against creditors and others in Canada.
"Canadian Subsidiary" means any Subsidiary that is incorporated, organized or
otherwise established under the laws of Canada or any political subdivision of Canada.
"Canadian Supplemental Final Order" means an order of the Canadian Court
under Section 18.6 of the CCAA, together with all extensions, modifications and amendments
thereto, in each case in form and substance satisfactory to Agents, giving full effect to the Final
Supplemental DIP Order, which order shall specifically but not exclusively provide that each of
the Canadian Credit Parties is authorized to enter into the Credit Documents (as amended and
restated) to which it is a party, and provide, execute and deliver all such guarantees, documents,
security interests and liens as are contemplated in such Credit Documents and granting to the
Collateral Agent a fixed charge, mortgage, hypothec, security interest and lien in all of the
Collateral in which any of the Canadian Credit Parties now or hereafter has an interest ranking in
priority to all other encumbrances.
"Canadian Supplemental Interim Order" means an order of the Canadian
Court under Section 18.6 of the CCAA, together with all extensions, modifications and
amendments thereto, in each case in form and substance satisfactory to Agents, giving full effect
to the Interim Supplemental DIP Order, which order shall specifically but not exclusively
provide that each of the Canadian Credit Parties is authorized to enter into the Credit Documents
(as amended and restated) to which it is a party, and provide, execute and deliver all such
guarantees, documents, security interests and liens as are contemplated in such Credit
Documents and granting to the Collateral Agent a fixed charge, mortgage, hypothec, security
interest and lien in all of the Collateral in which any of the Canadian Credit Parties now or
hereafter has an interest ranking in priority to all other encumbrances.
"Capital Lease" means, as applied to any Person, any lease of any property
(whether real, personal or mixed) by that Person as lessee that, in conformity with GAAP, is or
should be accounted for as a capital lease on the balance sheet ofthat Person.
"Carve-Out" means the following claims: (a) quarterly fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1930(a)(6), (b) fees payable to the clerk ofthe Bankruptcy Court and any agent thereof and (c)
fees and disbursements incurred by the Credit Parties' professionals (other than the Credit Parties'
ordinary course professionals) and the professionals of the Committee retained prior to the Exit
Facilities Conversion Date (collectively, the "Professionals") and allowed by order of the
Bankruptcy Court in the aggregate amount not to exceed $1,500,000, in each case incurred prior
to a Carve-Out Event but not yet paid to the extent such fees and expenses are approved by the
Bankruptcy Court, subject to the right of Administrative Agent, the Lenders and any other party
in interest to object to the award of such fees and expenses; provided, however, that the Carve-
Out shall not include, apply to, or be available for any fees or expenses incurred by any party,
including the Credit Parties, any Committee or any Professional in connection with the
8
33. investigation, initiation or prosecution of any claims, defenses or causes of action (as described
in the Interim DIP Order) against the Agents or the Lenders and as otherwise provided in the
Interim DIP Order or Final DIP Order, as applicable; provided, further, prior to a Carve-Out
Event the Credit Parties shall be permitted to pay compensation and reimbursement of expenses
allowed and payable under Sections 328, 330 and 331 of the Bankruptcy Code or otherwise
pursuant to an order of the Bankruptcy Court, as the same may be due and payable, and the same
shall not reduce the Carve-Out, subject to the right of Administrative Agent, the Lenders and any
other party in interest to object to such payments; provided, further, that in the event of any
inconsistency in the definition of "Carve-Out" between the provisions of this Agreement and the
Interim DIP Order or Final DIP Order, the provisions of the Interim DIP Order or Final DIP
Order shall govern.
"Carve-Out Event" as defined in Section 8.2.
"Carve-Out Event Notice" as defmed in Section 8.2.
"Cases" as defined in the recitals hereto.
"Cash" means money, currency or a credit balance in any demand or Deposit
Account.
"Cash Equivalents" means, as at any date of determination, (i) marketable
securities (a) issued or directly and unconditionally guaranteed as to interest and principal by the
United States Government or the Government of Canada or (b) issued by any agency of the
United States, in each case maturing within one year after the date of acquisition; (ii) marketable
direct obligations issued by any state ofthe United States of America or any political subdivision
of any such state or any public instrumentality thereof, in each case maturing within one year
after the date of acquisition and having, at the time of the acquisition thereof, a rating of at least
A-1 from S&P or at least P-1 from Moody's; (iii) commercial paper maturing no more than one
year from the date of acquisition thereof and having, at the time of the acquisition thereof, a
rating of at least A-1 from S&P or at least P-1 from Moody's; (iv) certificates of deposit or
bankers' acceptances maturing within one year after the date of acquisition and issued or
accepted by any Lender or by any commercial bank organized under the laws of the United
States of America or any state thereof or the District of Columbia that (a) is at least "adequately
capitalized" (as defined in the regulations of its primary Federal banking regulator) and (b) has
Tier 1 capital (as defined in such regulations) of not less than $1 00,000,000; (v) fully
collateralized repurchase agreements with a term of not more than 90 days for securities
described in clause (i) above and entered into with a financial institution satisfying the criteria of
clause (iv) above; and (vi) shares of any money market mutual fund that (a) has substantially all
ofits assets invested continuously in the types of investments referred to in clauses (i) through (v)
above, (b) has net assets of not less than $500,000,000, and (c) has the highest rating obtainable
from either S&P or Moody's.
9
34. "CCAA" means Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada), as now and
hereafter in effect, or any successor statute.
"Certificate re Non-Bank Status" means a certificate substantially in the forn1 of
Exhibit F.
"Change of Control" means, at any time on or after the Exit Facilities
Conversion Date (i) prior to a Qualified Public Offering, (a) Sponsor and its Controlled
Investment Affiliates shall not beneficially own and control at least 40% on a fully diluted basis
of the economic and voting interests in the Equity Interests of Holdings, (b) Sponsor and its
Controlled Investment Affiliates fail to elect a majority of the members of the board of directors
(or similar governing body) of Holdings or (c) any Person or "group" (within the meaning of
Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) shall at any time have acquired beneficial
ownership on a fully diluted basis of the voting and/or economic interests in the Equity Interests
of Holdings greater than the beneficial ownership on a fully diluted basis of the voting and/or
economic interests in the Equity Interests of Holdings owned by the Sponsor and its Controlled
Investment Affiliates at such time; (ii) after a Qualified Public Offering, any Person or "group"
(within the meaning of Rules 13d-3 and 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) other than Sponsor and
its Controlled Investment Affiliates (a) shall have acquired beneficial ownership of 35% or more
on a fully diluted basis ofthe voting and/or economic interest in the Equity Interests of Holdings
or (b) shall have obtained the power (whether or not exercised) to elect a majority of the
members of the board of directors (or similar governing body) of Holdings; (iii) Holdings shall
cease to beneficially own and control, directly or indirectly, 100% on a fully diluted basis of the
economic and voting interest in the Equity Interests of Systems; (iv) the majority of the seats
(other than vacant seats) on the board of directors (or similar governing body) of Holdings cease
to be occupied by Persons who either (a) were members of the board of directors of Holdings on
the Exit Facilities Conversion Date or (b) were nominated for election by the board of directors
of Holdings, a majority of whom were directors on the Exit Facilities Conversion Date or whose
election or nomination for election was previously approved by a majority of such directors.
"CIT" as defined in the preamble.
"Claim" has the meaning specified in Section 101(5) ofthe Bankruptcy Code.
"Class" means with respect to Lenders, each of the following classes of Lenders:
(i) Lenders having Term Loan Exposure, (ii) Lenders having Revolving Loan Exposure and (iii)
Lenders having LC Deposits.
"Closing Date" means March 30, 2007.
10
35. "Closing Date Certificate" means a Closing Date Certificate substantially in the
form of Exhibit G-1.
"Collateral" means, collectively, all of the real, personal and mixed property
(including Equity Interests) in which Liens are purported to be granted pursuant to the Collateral
Documents as security for the Obligations.
"Collateral Agent" as defined in the preamble hereto.
"Collateral Documents" means the Pledge and Security Agreement, Canadian
Pledge and Security Agreement, the Quebec Security the Collateral Servicing Agreement, the
Mortgages, the Intellectual Property Security Agreements, the Landlord Personal Property
Collateral Access Agreements, if any, and all other instruments, documents and agreements
delivered by any Credit Party pursuant to this Agreement or any of the other Credit Documents
in order to.grant to Collateral Agent, for the benefit of Secured Parties, or perfect a Lien on any
real, personal or mixed property of that Credit Party as security for the Obligations.
"Collateral Questionnaire" means a certificate in form satisfactory to Collateral
Agent that provides information with respect to the personal or mixed property of each Credit
Party.
"Collateral Servicing Agreement" means a Collateral Servicing Agreement, in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Collateral Agent, by and among Corporation
Service Company, each Credit Party (other than any Foreign Subsidiary), the Collateral Agent
and the Second Lien Collateral Agent.
"Committed Capital Expenditures" as defined in Section 6.7(d).
"Committee" means the Official Committee ofUnsecured Creditors appointed in
the Cases pursuant to Section 1102 ofthe Bankruptcy Code, on August 5, 2005, as reconstituted
from time to time.
"Commitment" means any Revolving Commitment, LC Commitment or Term
Loan Commitment.
"Commodity Agreement" means any commodity exchange contract, commodity
swap agreement, futures contract, option contract, synthetic cap or other similar agreement or
arrangement, each of which is for the purpose of hedging the commodity risk associated with
Holdings' and its Subsidiaries' operations and not for speculative purposes.
11
36. "Compliance Certificate" means a Compliance Certificate substantially in the
form ofExhibit C.
"Confirmation Order" as defined in Section 3.4(e)(iv).
"Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA" means, for any period, an amount
determined for Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis equal to (i) Consolidated
Net Income for such period, plus, to the extent deducted in determining such Consolidated Net
Income, the sum, without duplication, of amounts for (a) Consolidated Interest Expense for such
period; (b) consolidated income, single business, franchise, unitary or gross receipt tax expense
for such period; (c) total depreciation expense for such period; (d) total amortization expense for
such period; (e) the cumulative effect (whether positive or negative) of any change in accounting
principles; (f) management fees and expenses paid during such period pursuant to the
Management Agreement to the extent permitted hereunder; (g) Transaction Costs for such period;
(h) with respect to any period (including any Fiscal Quarter) during Fiscal Year 2006 or 2007,
costs and expenses resulting from administrative expenses paid with respect to the Cases for
professional fees and expenses in an amount up to, but not exceeding in the aggregate for Fiscal
Year 2006 and 2007, $30,000,000; (i) with respect to any period (including any Fiscal Quarter)
during Fiscal Year 2006 or 2007, amounts paid as cure payments or similar costs in connection
with assumptions of executory contracts assumed during the Cases or as part of the Plan in an
amount up to, but not exceeding in the aggregate for Fiscal Year 2006 and 2007, $5,000,000; (j)
fees and charges related to any events or transactions that are unusual in nature and infrequent in
occurrence, in that it is unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the current ordinary and
typical activities of Borrowers and would not reasonably be expected to recur in a normal
operating cycle in an amount up to, but not exceeding, $1,000,000 in the aggregate for any
periods occurring during any Fiscal Year and, $3,000,000 in the aggregate from the Closing Date
to the date of determination; (k) with respect to any period (including any Fiscal Quarter) during
Fiscal Year 2007, non-recurring costs and expenses arising from or recognized in connection
with the consummation and effectiveness of the Plan in an amount up to, but not exceeding in the
aggregate for Fiscal Year 2007, $5,000,000; and (1) other non-Cash charges for such period
(excluding any such non- Cash charge to the extent that it represents an accrual or reserve for
potential Cash payment in any future period or amortization of a prepaid Cash payment that was
made in a prior period); and (m) with respect to any period (including any Fiscal Quarter) during
Fiscal Year 2007, amounts paid to Sponsor in connection with a claim by Sponsor for substantial
contribution in accordance with the Plan in an amount up to, but not exceeding, $5,000,000,
minus (ii) to the extent included in determining such Consolidated Net Income, non-Cash gains
for such period (excluding any such non -Cash gain to the extent it represents the reversal of an
accrual or reserve for potential Cash gain in any prior period).
"Consolidated Capital Expenditures" means, for any period, the aggregate of all
expenditures of Holdings and its Subsidiaries during such period determined on a consolidated
basis that, in accordance with GAAP, are or should be included in "purchase of property and
equipment" or similar items reflected in the consolidated statement of cash flows of Holdings
12
37. and its Subsidiaries, but excluding, however, any such expenditures made in connection with a
Permitted Acquisition permitted hereunder.
"Consolidated Cash Interest Expense" means, for any period, total interest
expense (including that portion attributable to Capital Leases in accordance with GAAP and
capitalized interest) of Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis with respect to all
outstanding Indebtedness of Holdings and its Subsidiaries, including all commissions, discounts
and other fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and net costs under Interest Rate
Agreements, but excluding, however, any amount not payable in Cash and any amounts referred
to in Section 2.ll(f) payable on or before the Closing Date.
"Consolidated Current Assets" means, as at any date of determination, the total
assets of Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis that may properly be classified as
current assets in conformity with GAAP, excluding Cash and Cash Equivalents.
"Consolidated Current Liabilities" means, as at any date of determination, the
total liabilities of Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis that may properly be
classified as current liabilities in conformity with GAAP, excluding the current portion of long
term debt.
"Consolidated Excess Cash Flow" means, for any Fiscal Year, an amount (if
positive) equal to: (i) the sum, without duplication, of (a) Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA for
such Fiscal Year; plus (b) the Consolidated Working Capital Adjustment for such Fiscal Year;
minus (ii) the sum, without duplication, of (a) scheduled repayments of Indebtedness for
borrowed money (including the implied principal component of scheduled payments made on
Capital Leases, but excluding repayments of Revolving Loans or Swing Line Loans except to the
extent the Revolving Commitments are permanently reduced in connection with such
repayments) paid in Cash during such Fiscal Year; (b) Consolidated Capital Expenditures for
such Fiscal Year (net of any proceeds of (x) any related financings with respect to such
expenditures, (y) any sales of assets used to finance such expenditures and (z) any Spent
Committed Capital Expenditures deducted in the calculation of Consolidated Excess Cash Flow
for the preceding Fiscal Year); (c) Consolidated Cash Interest Expense for such Fiscal Year;
(d) with respect to Fiscal Year 2007, any amounts referred to in Section 2.11 (f) paid on or before
the Closing Date; (e) consolidated income, single business, franchise, unitary or gross receipt tax
expense payable in cash with respect to such Fiscal Year; (f) management fees and expenses paid
during such Fiscal Year pursuant to the Management Agreement to the extent permitted
hereunder; (g) with respect to Fiscal Year 2007, Transaction Costs paid in Cash during such
Fiscal Year; (h) with respect to Fiscal Year 2007, costs and expenses resulting from
administrative expenses with respect to the Cases which are for professional fees and expenses
and are paid in Cash during such Fiscal Year; (i) amounts paid in cash during such Fiscal Year as
cure payments or similar costs in connection with assumptions of executory contracts assumed
during the Cases or as part of the Plan; U) fees, charges and expenses related to any events or
transactions that are paid in Cash during such Fiscal Year and are unusual in nature and
infrequent in occurrence, in that it is unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the current
13
38. ordinary and typical activities of Borrowers and would not reasonably be expected to recur in a
normal operating cycle in an amount up to, but not exceeding, in the aggregate for any periods
occurring during any Fiscal Year $1,000,000 and, $3,000,000 in the aggregate from the Closing
Date to the date of determination; (k) with respect to Fiscal Year 2007, non-recurring costs and
expenses paid in Cash during such Fiscal Year arising from or recognized in coru1ection with the
consummation and effectiveness of the Plan; and (I) the amount of Spent Committed Capital
Expenditures paid in Cash within ninety days after the end of such Fiscal Year.
"Consolidated Interest Expense" means, for any period, total interest expense
(including that portion attributable to Capital Leases in accordance with GAAP and capitalized
interest) of Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis with respect to all outstanding
Indebtedness of Holdings and its Subsidiaries, including all commissions, discounts and other
fees and charges owed with respect to letters of credit and net costs under Interest Rate
Agreements, but excluding, however, any amounts referred to in Section 2.ll(f) payable on or
before the Closing Date.
"Consolidated Net Income" means, for any period, (i) the net income (or loss) of
Holdings and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis for such period taken as a single accounting
period determined in conformity with GAAP, minus (ii) (a) the income (or loss) of any Person
(other than a Subsidiary of Holdings) in which any other Person (other than Holdings or any of
its Subsidiaries) has a joint interest, except to the extent of the amount of dividends or other
distributions actually paid to Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries by such Person during such
period, (b) the income (or loss) of any Person accrued prior to the date it becomes a Subsidiary
of Holdings or is merged into or consolidated with Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries or that
Person's assets are acquired by Holdings or any of its Subsidiaries, (c) the income of any
Subsidiary of Holdings to the extent that the declaration or payment of dividends or similar
distributions by that Subsidiary of that income is not at the time permitted by operation of the
terms of its charter or any agreement, instrument, judgment, decree, order, statute, rule or
governmental regulation applicable to that Subsidiary, (d) any after-tax gains or losses
attributable to Asset Sales or returned surplus assets of any Pension Plan, and (e) (to the extent
not included in clauses (a) through (d) above) any net extraordinary gains or net extraordinary
losses.
"Consolidated Total Debt" means, as at any date of determination, the aggregate
stated balance sheet amount of all Indebtedness of Holdings and its Subsidiaries determined on a
consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP.
"Consolidated Working Capital" means, as at any date of determination, the
excess of Consolidated Current Assets over Consolidated Current Liabilities.
"Consolidated Working Capital Adjustment" means, for any period on a
consolidated basis, the amount (which may be a negative number) by which Consolidated
14