Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics Transcript, June 3 2009, Inside Linden LabDoug Thompson
How does the culture INSIDE Linden Lab impact the culture of Second Life? How do the values and attitudes of the Lab translate into changes to how Second Life works? What is the “day in the life” of a Lab employee look like? What tools and cultural norms influence how people work together and operate?
This episode of Metanomics featured Thomas Malaby, discussing his ethnographic study of Linden Lab. In addition, Bettina Tizzy discussed the role of the artist and the "not possible in real life" on virtual worlds.
To view the video on which this transcript is based visit:
http://tinyurl.com/metanomics-malaby
041408 Linden Labs Past Present And Future Metanomics TranscriptRemedy Communications
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Two analysts discuss concerns about Second Life and Linden Lab. They see problems with flat user growth, unstable software releases, and poor communication. They believe Linden Lab needs new leadership with business experience to address these issues. Alternatives like Qwaq and Metaplace are seen as more suitable for enterprise use due to their focus on stability, security, and integration with other business tools and platforms.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics Transcript, June 3 2009, Inside Linden LabDoug Thompson
How does the culture INSIDE Linden Lab impact the culture of Second Life? How do the values and attitudes of the Lab translate into changes to how Second Life works? What is the “day in the life” of a Lab employee look like? What tools and cultural norms influence how people work together and operate?
This episode of Metanomics featured Thomas Malaby, discussing his ethnographic study of Linden Lab. In addition, Bettina Tizzy discussed the role of the artist and the "not possible in real life" on virtual worlds.
To view the video on which this transcript is based visit:
http://tinyurl.com/metanomics-malaby
041408 Linden Labs Past Present And Future Metanomics TranscriptRemedy Communications
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Two analysts discuss concerns about Second Life and Linden Lab. They see problems with flat user growth, unstable software releases, and poor communication. They believe Linden Lab needs new leadership with business experience to address these issues. Alternatives like Qwaq and Metaplace are seen as more suitable for enterprise use due to their focus on stability, security, and integration with other business tools and platforms.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
February 28th cyborg to borg—cont’d, with michael chorostDoug Thompson
Robert Bloomfield welcomes Michael Chorost once again, as his guest on Metanomics. The discussion during Michael’s last visit centered on his book, Re-Built and his experience of receiving a cochlear implant. As a science writer, he knew how the implant worked, yet it was a fascinating journey to share his experience of stepping up to Cyborg status, utilizing lines of code and an implanted physical device to regain the ability to hear. His new book, World Wide Mind has just been released and further explores the integration of humans and machine coupled with the connective potential of the internet. It’s been widely praised in reviews including The New York Times, Wired Magazine, New Scientist, and The L-Magazine. All agree that the science is dazzling, and the interwoven account of his personal journey to become a more complete human, emotionally speaks to how this merge with technology might affect us all.
Click here to watch video http://www.metanomics.net/show/february_28th/
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
This document summarizes a Metanomics podcast episode from September 30, 2009. The episode discusses social media and virtual communities. Guest Chris Abraham initially criticized Second Life but later recognized the passion of its community. He sees potential for simulation and collaboration in virtual worlds. Abraham believes Twitter allows quicker crisis response than blogs. While immersive, Second Life lacks elements that attract youth. Virtual communities have engaged Abraham since the early 1990s.
My talk from Playful 11 in London where I argue we all might be cyborgs already. I talk about how we cognitively project ourselves to our surroundings and possessions, and why everything will be about software, designed behaviour and superpowers.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Second Life Next: Dusan Writer's 2010 SLCC Keynote PresentaionDoug Thompson
My Keynote Presentation from the Second Life Community Convention 2010.
To view the video of the presentation fast forward to the latter half of this video:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/8922472
And this:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/8925416
Masterclass on digital anthropology and our virtual livesDoug Thompson
How have virtual worlds informed the broader culture? What can we learn about the journey of being human from the journey of adapting to a virtual society? Have the lines blurred between the digital and the ‘real’, between our avatar selves and our physical ones?
Click here to watch video
http://www.metanomics.net/show/january_31_masterclass_on_digital_anthropology_and_our_virtual_lives/
This document provides a transcript of an interview between Edward Castronova and Robert Bloomfield. Some key points:
1. Castronova discusses his background in economics and how he came to write about virtual worlds after finding his previous research unfulfilling.
2. He talks about some of his work analyzing the economies of virtual worlds like EverQuest and comparing them to real world GDP.
3. The interview explores Castronova's new book which puts forward a theory of migration between real and virtual worlds based on economic theories of wages and time allocation. It also develops a theory of fun optimization.
4. Castronova discusses why a theory of fun is needed given the practical industry developing fun
This document summarizes a discussion from the Metanomics podcast about the upcoming Second Life Community Convention (SLCC).
The SLCC is an annual real-world conference and social event for the Second Life community held in August. It allows community members to meet face-to-face, network, and discuss their work in Second Life. This year's convention will be held August 13-15 in Boston. Early registration discounts end on July 3rd and hotel rooms are filling up. The convention features tracks on a variety of topics related to Second Life like business, education, art, and technology. Content from the convention will also be streamed virtually in Second Life.
This document summarizes a discussion from the Metanomics podcast about the upcoming Second Life Community Convention (SLCC).
The SLCC is an annual real-world conference and social event for those engaged with Second Life. It allows participants to network, learn about new developments, and discuss the future of Second Life. This year's convention will be held August 13-15 in Boston. Early registration discounts end July 3rd and hotel rooms are filling up. The convention aims to capture many aspects of how Second Life is used through various topic tracks. There will also be a virtual component, with streaming of some sessions in Second Life itself. The discussion focused on the importance of the community coming together at a time when Second Life
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
The RFID End-User in 2011: Why 2011 Will be Another Big Year for RFIDVDC Research Group
During this webcast, Drew Nathanson, Director of Research Operations at VDC Research, discusses how the RFID end-user community has changed in recent years, how the perception of the technology has shifted and why that will translate into an expected 64% increase in RFID budgets for 2011.
- The document summarizes an interview between Robert Bloomfield and Larry Johnson of the New Media Consortium on Johnson's group's work in virtual worlds like Second Life.
- The NMC operates the largest educational project in any virtual world, with over 120 islands and 8,000 members, though it also does work outside of virtual worlds.
- While many universities have a presence in Second Life, museums have been slower to participate significantly. The NMC works with some research centers and has hosted virtual art exhibits in collaboration with real-world museums.
- The NMC's virtual world operations are self-sustaining through leasing virtual land to educational institutions and focusing projects on exploring new uses of virtual spaces for teaching
Reuben Steiger is the CEO of Millions of Us, a social media agency that was one of the first to market in Second Life. Millions of Us has since expanded to build content in other virtual worlds like Sony Home and license virtual goods. Reuben discussed why Millions of Us is no longer active in Second Life, primarily citing issues with metrics, scale, and attracting advertisers due to Second Life's smaller user base compared to other platforms. He also noted control issues were not as big a hurdle as initially thought for brands in Second Life.
Cancer occurs when cells divide uncontrollably and displace normal cells. There are many risk factors for cancer, including exposure to carcinogens like tobacco smoke, radiation, viruses, and certain chemicals. Cancer progresses by initial mutations in genes controlling cell division, formation of tumors, and potential metastasis to other body sites. Current cancer treatments include surgery, radiation, and drugs, but future treatments may involve immunotherapy and gene therapy.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
PDF: Virtual Goods Live from San Jose: Metanomics Transcript September 24, 2009Doug Thompson
Philip Rosedale and Tom Hale appear as guests on Metanomics, a virtual world broadcast. In this episode, a mixed reality event joins the virtual world of Second Life with the Engage Expo in San Jose and explores the market for virtual goods in Second Life.
To view the episode visit:
http://www.metanomics.net/show/virtual_goods_and_linden_lab/
Virtual Goods Live from San Jose: Metanomics Transcript September 24, 2009Doug Thompson
Philip Rosedale and Tom Hale appear as guests on Metanomics, a virtual world broadcast. In this episode, a mixed reality event joins the virtual world of Second Life with the Engage Expo in San Jose and explores the market for virtual goods in Second Life.
To view the episode visit:
http://www.metanomics.net/show/virtual_goods_and_linden_lab/
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
February 28th cyborg to borg—cont’d, with michael chorostDoug Thompson
Robert Bloomfield welcomes Michael Chorost once again, as his guest on Metanomics. The discussion during Michael’s last visit centered on his book, Re-Built and his experience of receiving a cochlear implant. As a science writer, he knew how the implant worked, yet it was a fascinating journey to share his experience of stepping up to Cyborg status, utilizing lines of code and an implanted physical device to regain the ability to hear. His new book, World Wide Mind has just been released and further explores the integration of humans and machine coupled with the connective potential of the internet. It’s been widely praised in reviews including The New York Times, Wired Magazine, New Scientist, and The L-Magazine. All agree that the science is dazzling, and the interwoven account of his personal journey to become a more complete human, emotionally speaks to how this merge with technology might affect us all.
Click here to watch video http://www.metanomics.net/show/february_28th/
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
This document summarizes a Metanomics podcast episode from September 30, 2009. The episode discusses social media and virtual communities. Guest Chris Abraham initially criticized Second Life but later recognized the passion of its community. He sees potential for simulation and collaboration in virtual worlds. Abraham believes Twitter allows quicker crisis response than blogs. While immersive, Second Life lacks elements that attract youth. Virtual communities have engaged Abraham since the early 1990s.
My talk from Playful 11 in London where I argue we all might be cyborgs already. I talk about how we cognitively project ourselves to our surroundings and possessions, and why everything will be about software, designed behaviour and superpowers.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Second Life Next: Dusan Writer's 2010 SLCC Keynote PresentaionDoug Thompson
My Keynote Presentation from the Second Life Community Convention 2010.
To view the video of the presentation fast forward to the latter half of this video:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/8922472
And this:
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/8925416
Masterclass on digital anthropology and our virtual livesDoug Thompson
How have virtual worlds informed the broader culture? What can we learn about the journey of being human from the journey of adapting to a virtual society? Have the lines blurred between the digital and the ‘real’, between our avatar selves and our physical ones?
Click here to watch video
http://www.metanomics.net/show/january_31_masterclass_on_digital_anthropology_and_our_virtual_lives/
This document provides a transcript of an interview between Edward Castronova and Robert Bloomfield. Some key points:
1. Castronova discusses his background in economics and how he came to write about virtual worlds after finding his previous research unfulfilling.
2. He talks about some of his work analyzing the economies of virtual worlds like EverQuest and comparing them to real world GDP.
3. The interview explores Castronova's new book which puts forward a theory of migration between real and virtual worlds based on economic theories of wages and time allocation. It also develops a theory of fun optimization.
4. Castronova discusses why a theory of fun is needed given the practical industry developing fun
This document summarizes a discussion from the Metanomics podcast about the upcoming Second Life Community Convention (SLCC).
The SLCC is an annual real-world conference and social event for the Second Life community held in August. It allows community members to meet face-to-face, network, and discuss their work in Second Life. This year's convention will be held August 13-15 in Boston. Early registration discounts end on July 3rd and hotel rooms are filling up. The convention features tracks on a variety of topics related to Second Life like business, education, art, and technology. Content from the convention will also be streamed virtually in Second Life.
This document summarizes a discussion from the Metanomics podcast about the upcoming Second Life Community Convention (SLCC).
The SLCC is an annual real-world conference and social event for those engaged with Second Life. It allows participants to network, learn about new developments, and discuss the future of Second Life. This year's convention will be held August 13-15 in Boston. Early registration discounts end July 3rd and hotel rooms are filling up. The convention aims to capture many aspects of how Second Life is used through various topic tracks. There will also be a virtual component, with streaming of some sessions in Second Life itself. The discussion focused on the importance of the community coming together at a time when Second Life
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
The RFID End-User in 2011: Why 2011 Will be Another Big Year for RFIDVDC Research Group
During this webcast, Drew Nathanson, Director of Research Operations at VDC Research, discusses how the RFID end-user community has changed in recent years, how the perception of the technology has shifted and why that will translate into an expected 64% increase in RFID budgets for 2011.
- The document summarizes an interview between Robert Bloomfield and Larry Johnson of the New Media Consortium on Johnson's group's work in virtual worlds like Second Life.
- The NMC operates the largest educational project in any virtual world, with over 120 islands and 8,000 members, though it also does work outside of virtual worlds.
- While many universities have a presence in Second Life, museums have been slower to participate significantly. The NMC works with some research centers and has hosted virtual art exhibits in collaboration with real-world museums.
- The NMC's virtual world operations are self-sustaining through leasing virtual land to educational institutions and focusing projects on exploring new uses of virtual spaces for teaching
Reuben Steiger is the CEO of Millions of Us, a social media agency that was one of the first to market in Second Life. Millions of Us has since expanded to build content in other virtual worlds like Sony Home and license virtual goods. Reuben discussed why Millions of Us is no longer active in Second Life, primarily citing issues with metrics, scale, and attracting advertisers due to Second Life's smaller user base compared to other platforms. He also noted control issues were not as big a hurdle as initially thought for brands in Second Life.
Cancer occurs when cells divide uncontrollably and displace normal cells. There are many risk factors for cancer, including exposure to carcinogens like tobacco smoke, radiation, viruses, and certain chemicals. Cancer progresses by initial mutations in genes controlling cell division, formation of tumors, and potential metastasis to other body sites. Current cancer treatments include surgery, radiation, and drugs, but future treatments may involve immunotherapy and gene therapy.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
PDF: Virtual Goods Live from San Jose: Metanomics Transcript September 24, 2009Doug Thompson
Philip Rosedale and Tom Hale appear as guests on Metanomics, a virtual world broadcast. In this episode, a mixed reality event joins the virtual world of Second Life with the Engage Expo in San Jose and explores the market for virtual goods in Second Life.
To view the episode visit:
http://www.metanomics.net/show/virtual_goods_and_linden_lab/
Virtual Goods Live from San Jose: Metanomics Transcript September 24, 2009Doug Thompson
Philip Rosedale and Tom Hale appear as guests on Metanomics, a virtual world broadcast. In this episode, a mixed reality event joins the virtual world of Second Life with the Engage Expo in San Jose and explores the market for virtual goods in Second Life.
To view the episode visit:
http://www.metanomics.net/show/virtual_goods_and_linden_lab/
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
This document summarizes the 100th episode of Metanomics, a virtual world podcast hosted in Second Life. It discusses the new episode celebrating the milestone, announces an upcoming thank you party for viewers, and introduces the guest Joshua Fairfield, an expert in virtual law, who will discuss Linden Lab's new Second Life Terms of Service. It also mentions a contest announced by the producer seeking visions of the future of media production and broadcasting.
This document summarizes the 100th episode of the Metanomics podcast. It discusses the new Second Life Terms of Service and interviews law professor Joshua Fairfield as a guest. Some key points:
- The episode celebrates reaching 100 episodes of Metanomics since it started in 2007.
- Linden Lab recently announced new Second Life Terms of Service that focus on treating virtual items as licensed rather than owned.
- Fairfield analyzes the new Terms of Service and says they represent both an evolution towards more corporate control of virtual worlds as well as taking privacy more seriously.
- He notes the Terms move away from the idea of Second Life as a place where users can truly own virtual land and items
Richard Bartle, the co-creator of the first virtual world (MUD), was interviewed. Some key points:
- Bartle co-developed MUD with Roy Trubshaw in the 1970s, one of the earliest virtual worlds.
- Bartle created a model of four player types (achievers, explorers, socializers, killers) based on what motivates players. However, as a designer he cannot experience virtual worlds in the same way as regular players.
- His four player types model is still used by some game designers to help balance gameplay and provide the right incentives, though they may not fully utilize the dynamics between player types.
- There have been suggestions
Julian Dibbell discusses the concept of "ludo-capitalism", where play and games are becoming indistinguishable from economic production. He gives examples of virtual economies like gold farming where gameplay has become a form of outsourced labor. Dibbell also suggests this could spread to other areas, proposing hypothetical games that could crowdsource medical diagnoses or data tagging tasks, blurring the lines between work and play.
Douglas Rushkoff was interviewed on the podcast Metanomics about his upcoming PBS Frontline documentary "Digital Nation".
The documentary is integrated with a website that has been active for over two years, collecting additional footage and stories from the public. This allowed the public to participate and influence the direction of the documentary. After it airs, the website will continue hosting discussions on technology topics each month.
During filming, Rushkoff was surprised to hear Philip Rosedale of Second Life believe the virtual world would be indistinguishable from reality within 10 years. He was also surprised by research showing advantages in negotiations from having a taller avatar in virtual worlds, and kids believing they really experienced virtual reality simulations.
2010 & next second life, virtual worlds and the state of the unionDoug Thompson
Its been a decade of advances for virtual worlds, ending with a year that many won’t forget. As the technologies allowing immersive experiences expand, Second Life has come to a cross-roads of sorts, with Linden pulling the plug on its enterprise product and raising the price for educational and non-profit institutions.
Click here to watch video
http://www.metanomics.net/show/december_13_2010_next_-_second_life_virtual_worlds_and_the_state_of_the_uni/
This document summarizes a discussion between journalists and entrepreneurs in Second Life. The panelists discuss their experiences with virtual world journalism and entrepreneurship in Second Life. They talk about how Linden Lab initially promoted Second Life as a place for entrepreneurship and the challenges real-world entrepreneurs may face in establishing a business in Second Life, including needing to understand the culture and community. The panel also discusses different definitions of entrepreneurship and the role of advertising for in-world media businesses.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Mitch Kapor, chairman of the board of Linden Lab, was interviewed by Robert Bloomfield. Some of the key points discussed include:
- Kapor saw potential in Philip Rosedale's idea for a virtual world where users could create content, even though it was deemed too risky by most venture capitalists at the time.
- Second Life has grown tremendously from its origins but retains the core idea of an infinitely expandable simulation created by its users.
- Kapor remains actively involved in Linden Lab as well as other startup projects, and sees potential for virtual worlds to be used increasingly for business applications.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
The document summarizes a discussion between Robert Bloomfield and Tom Hale of Linden Lab about recent announcements from Linden Lab regarding changes to Second Life. Some of the key announcements include the rollout of the new Second Life Viewer 2, which is now the standard viewer, changes to the new user orientation and registration processes, and clarification of maturity ratings and terms of service. Tom Hale discusses his role as Chief Product Officer at Linden Lab and explains that the announcements reflect Linden Lab's strategic focus on improving the experience for new users and welcoming more new residents to grow the Second Life ecosystem. Hale also provides details on changes to Linden Lab's internal processes to support larger, more iterative releases.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
This document summarizes a discussion between Robert Bloomfield and Tyler Cowen on the podcast Metanomics. Some of the key topics discussed include:
1) Tyler Cowen's view that autistic thinking styles are well-suited to online environments and activities like blogging, collecting information, and imposing order on disordered information.
2) Cowen's argument that concerns over technologies like Google making people less able to focus or engage in deep reading overlook the ability to choose focus or multitasking.
3) The trend toward shorter, bite-sized cultural works and whether this represents a positive development, with Cowen arguing it allows for more individual control and variety while not replacing all long-form
This document summarizes a discussion between Robert Bloomfield and Tyler Cowen on the podcast Metanomics. Some of the key topics discussed include:
1) Tyler Cowen's view that autistic thinking styles are well-suited to ordering and making sense of large amounts of information available online. He sees similarities between autistic traits like focus and information collecting and how many people interact with the internet.
2) Cowen argues that concerns over technologies like Google making people less able to focus or engage in "deep reading" overlook how individuals can choose to use technologies. He believes people are still reading long-form works and that shorter formats allow ideas to spread more quickly.
3) The discussion touches
Metanomics is a weekly Web-based show on the serious uses of virtual worlds. This transcript is from a past show.
For this and other videos, visit us at http://metanomics.net.
Similar to 060309 Inside Linden Lab Metanomics Transcript (20)
This document summarizes a discussion on the Metanomics podcast between Robert Bloomfield and Paulette Robinson. Paulette Robinson is the founder and director of the Federal Consortium for Virtual Worlds, which brings together government, industry, and academics to explore uses of virtual worlds. She discusses the recent virtual worlds conference hosted by the consortium, as well as a new virtual government environment project that awarded contracts to four virtual world platforms to provide secure virtual training and collaboration services to the US government.
The document summarizes an interview on the podcast Metanomics with Paulette Robinson, the founder and director of the Federal Consortium for Virtual Worlds. The consortium brings together government, industry, and academics working with virtual worlds. Robinson discusses the recent annual conference which saw participation of over 3,500 people across multiple virtual and real world venues. She highlights several collaborations that have formed, including MilLands for the military and the vGov project, which aims to create a secure virtual world environment for all of government.
Jesse Schell discusses his concept of the "Gamepocalypse", where gaming elements are increasingly integrated into everyday life through emerging technologies. As an example, he describes how future toothbrushes may have sensors that track brushing quality and display it as part of a game or leaderboard. While some see this as an invasion of privacy, Schell believes many people will opt into such systems. He remains optimistic that games could positively influence society if designed well, but acknowledges the realities may be complex.
This document summarizes a discussion between Robert Bloomfield, Barry Joseph, and Marc Weiss about Marc and Barry's upcoming HBO documentary called "Meeting Online". Marc explains that the documentary will tell personal stories of people who met online and how those relationships developed offline. Barry encourages viewers to submit their own stories to the documentary's website. They discuss some examples of stories already submitted, including one woman who met her partner through World of Warcraft and Second Life.
The document summarizes a discussion between Barry Joseph and Marc Weiss on the Metanomics podcast about their documentary "Meeting Online" for HBO. The documentary will feature personal stories submitted online about relationships that began online and extended into real life. Barry Joseph's organization Global Kids is helping collect stories, including from Second Life. Joseph and Weiss met when Joseph contacted Weiss about a job after reading a newspaper article about Weiss's new nonprofit Web Lab.
The document summarizes an interview between Robert Bloomfield and Tom Hale of Linden Lab discussing recent announcements from Linden Lab. Key points:
- Linden Lab announced the new Second Life Viewer 2 which will become the standard viewer, replacing Viewer 1.23. They also announced changes to orientation, terms of service, and registration processes.
- The announcements reflect Linden Lab's strategic focus on improving the experience for new users and making Second Life more welcoming to bring in new residents.
- Tom Hale discusses changes to Linden Lab's internal processes to support the large Viewer update, including dedicated teams, design firms, user testing, and shorter release cycles going forward.
This summary discusses a virtual world podcast called Metanomics that took place on March 17, 2010.
1) The guest on the podcast was Tom Higgins from Unity Technologies, who discussed Unity's game development software and vision to make powerful tools accessible to all developers.
2) Unity offers various licensing options for its software, including a free basic license and paid Pro licenses starting at $1,500 per seat. Add-on licenses allow developers to deploy games on platforms like iPhone.
3) Unity has over 110,000 registered users since making the basic license free last October, though not all are active developers. Some major clients include Electronic Arts, Disney, and Lego. Unity aims to democrat
This summary discusses a podcast called Metanomics that was filmed in Second Life and broadcast weekly. The guest on this episode is Tom Higgins from Unity Technologies, who discusses Unity's game development software and goals. Some key points:
- Unity aims to make high-quality game development tools accessible to all developers through its free basic licenses and competitive pricing for pro licenses and platform add-ons.
- Unity has grown significantly in the last year to over 110,000 registered users since making the basic license free.
- Unity's vision is to make "author-once, deploy anywhere" a reality, allowing developers to build games once and deploy them across platforms with some adjustments.
- The Unity
This document summarizes a radio program called Metanomics that discusses expanding access to education through technology.
[1] The program interviews two professors, Rebecca Clothey and Kristen Betts from Drexel University, about their virtual conference called "Education for Everyone: Expanding Access Through Technology".
[2] Rebecca Clothey organized the conference which features on-demand presentations and live events from March 23rd to 25th discussing trends in technology that have expanded education opportunities. Presenters will discuss projects from around the world using technology for distance learning.
[3] The interview discusses the opportunities and challenges of online education. While technology provides more access, digital divides still exist due to lack
The representatives from Linden Lab discussed the recent release of the Second Life Viewer 2.0 beta and Linden Lab's new product marketing strategy. They explained that Viewer 2.0 and new Shared Media capabilities were launched along with Snowglobe 2.0 to provide more viewer choices for residents. The goal is to improve the new user experience and attract new residents while continuing to support the current community. They discussed plans to gather feedback during the beta period and launch a broader marketing campaign once Viewer 2.0 is complete.
ThinkBalm is a boutique analyst firm focused on the use of immersive technology in the workplace. Their recent report, "The Enterprise Immersive Software Decision-Making Guide", aims to help businesses choose immersive software solutions. ThinkBalm conducted the study by testing various virtual platforms themselves and through their Innovation Community of over 400 members. The report is intended to distill their experiences into an accessible guide for business decision-makers unfamiliar with immersive technologies. ThinkBalm is funded through traditional analyst consulting services provided to immersive technology vendors.
The document discusses a report by ThinkBalm, a boutique analyst firm focused on the use of immersive technology in the workplace. The report, called "The Enterprise Immersive Software Decision-Making Guide", aims to help large enterprises deciding whether to use new immersive technologies. ThinkBalm studied many different immersive software vendors and platforms, testing them out themselves. They found the types of people interested were changing from early adopters to more mainstream business decision-makers just starting to explore the potential. The guide seeks to distill ThinkBalm's experiences testing different technologies to help these decision-makers navigate options.
The document discusses a Metanomics podcast episode about using narratives and storytelling in virtual worlds. It introduces three guests: Jena Ball, who creates immersive "Story Quests" in Second Life; Christina Galanis, who directs a regional health information exchange that is using Second Life; and Brent Ward from Research Triangle Institute. Jena discusses her Story Quests, including one telling the story of an HIV-positive character named Uncle D to educate and reduce stigma. Christina explains how her organization is using Second Life to explain health information exchange, having expanded Jena's Uncle D story across multiple virtual worlds. Brent then discusses collaborations like those happening in New York at Research Triangle Park.
The document discusses a Metanomics podcast episode about using narratives and storytelling in virtual worlds. The episode features three guests: Jena Ball, who creates immersive "Story Quests" in Second Life; Christina Galanis from a regional health information exchange that is using Second Life; and Brent Ward from Research Triangle Park. Jena discusses her Story Quest about a character named Uncle D to educate about HIV/AIDS. Christina's organization worked with Jena to expand the Uncle D narrative in their Second Life region. Brent discusses collaborations similar to what is happening with the health organizations in Second Life.
The document discusses using games and virtual worlds to change how people work and businesses compete. It summarizes an interview with Byron Reeves, who argues that playing games at work can increase productivity and engagement in the same way napping does. Reeves discusses how virtual worlds can be used to actually conduct work by incorporating game elements like avatars, metrics, economies and competition. He argues the social engagement and interactions enabled by avatars in virtual spaces can have real psychological impacts.
The document discusses using games and virtual worlds to change how people work and businesses compete. It summarizes an interview with Byron Reeves, who argues that playing games at work can increase productivity and engagement in the same way napping does. Reeves discusses how virtual worlds can be used to actually conduct work by incorporating game elements like avatars, metrics, economies and competition. He argues the social engagement and interactions enabled by avatars in virtual spaces can increase engagement in work.
This document summarizes a radio program called Metanomics that discusses the problems of digital memory and the internet's inability to forget. The guest, Viktor Mayer-Schönberger, authored a book called "Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age" which examines how the permanent nature of digital information can negatively impact people's lives and reputations through stories like Stacy Snyder, who was denied her teaching certificate due to an old photo online, and Andrew Feldmar, who was banned from the US due to an old article found through an online search. Mayer-Schönberger argues that the ability to forget is important to being human and discusses solutions like making digital information more ephemeral rather than promoting total digital
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024Hiroshi SHIBATA
I develop the Ruby programming language, RubyGems, and Bundler, which are package managers for Ruby. Today, I will introduce how to enhance the security of your application using open-source software (OSS) examples from Ruby and RubyGems.
The first topic is CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures). I have published CVEs many times. But what exactly is a CVE? I'll provide a basic understanding of CVEs and explain how to detect and handle vulnerabilities in OSS.
Next, let's discuss package managers. Package managers play a critical role in the OSS ecosystem. I'll explain how to manage library dependencies in your application.
I'll share insights into how the Ruby and RubyGems core team works to keep our ecosystem safe. By the end of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to safeguard your code.
Dive into the realm of operating systems (OS) with Pravash Chandra Das, a seasoned Digital Forensic Analyst, as your guide. 🚀 This comprehensive presentation illuminates the core concepts, types, and evolution of OS, essential for understanding modern computing landscapes.
Beginning with the foundational definition, Das clarifies the pivotal role of OS as system software orchestrating hardware resources, software applications, and user interactions. Through succinct descriptions, he delineates the diverse types of OS, from single-user, single-task environments like early MS-DOS iterations, to multi-user, multi-tasking systems exemplified by modern Linux distributions.
Crucial components like the kernel and shell are dissected, highlighting their indispensable functions in resource management and user interface interaction. Das elucidates how the kernel acts as the central nervous system, orchestrating process scheduling, memory allocation, and device management. Meanwhile, the shell serves as the gateway for user commands, bridging the gap between human input and machine execution. 💻
The narrative then shifts to a captivating exploration of prominent desktop OSs, Windows, macOS, and Linux. Windows, with its globally ubiquitous presence and user-friendly interface, emerges as a cornerstone in personal computing history. macOS, lauded for its sleek design and seamless integration with Apple's ecosystem, stands as a beacon of stability and creativity. Linux, an open-source marvel, offers unparalleled flexibility and security, revolutionizing the computing landscape. 🖥️
Moving to the realm of mobile devices, Das unravels the dominance of Android and iOS. Android's open-source ethos fosters a vibrant ecosystem of customization and innovation, while iOS boasts a seamless user experience and robust security infrastructure. Meanwhile, discontinued platforms like Symbian and Palm OS evoke nostalgia for their pioneering roles in the smartphone revolution.
The journey concludes with a reflection on the ever-evolving landscape of OS, underscored by the emergence of real-time operating systems (RTOS) and the persistent quest for innovation and efficiency. As technology continues to shape our world, understanding the foundations and evolution of operating systems remains paramount. Join Pravash Chandra Das on this illuminating journey through the heart of computing. 🌟
Ivanti’s Patch Tuesday breakdown goes beyond patching your applications and brings you the intelligence and guidance needed to prioritize where to focus your attention first. Catch early analysis on our Ivanti blog, then join industry expert Chris Goettl for the Patch Tuesday Webinar Event. There we’ll do a deep dive into each of the bulletins and give guidance on the risks associated with the newly-identified vulnerabilities.
Skybuffer AI: Advanced Conversational and Generative AI Solution on SAP Busin...Tatiana Kojar
Skybuffer AI, built on the robust SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP), is the latest and most advanced version of our AI development, reaffirming our commitment to delivering top-tier AI solutions. Skybuffer AI harnesses all the innovative capabilities of the SAP BTP in the AI domain, from Conversational AI to cutting-edge Generative AI and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). It also helps SAP customers safeguard their investments into SAP Conversational AI and ensure a seamless, one-click transition to SAP Business AI.
With Skybuffer AI, various AI models can be integrated into a single communication channel such as Microsoft Teams. This integration empowers business users with insights drawn from SAP backend systems, enterprise documents, and the expansive knowledge of Generative AI. And the best part of it is that it is all managed through our intuitive no-code Action Server interface, requiring no extensive coding knowledge and making the advanced AI accessible to more users.
A Comprehensive Guide to DeFi Development Services in 2024Intelisync
DeFi represents a paradigm shift in the financial industry. Instead of relying on traditional, centralized institutions like banks, DeFi leverages blockchain technology to create a decentralized network of financial services. This means that financial transactions can occur directly between parties, without intermediaries, using smart contracts on platforms like Ethereum.
In 2024, we are witnessing an explosion of new DeFi projects and protocols, each pushing the boundaries of what’s possible in finance.
In summary, DeFi in 2024 is not just a trend; it’s a revolution that democratizes finance, enhances security and transparency, and fosters continuous innovation. As we proceed through this presentation, we'll explore the various components and services of DeFi in detail, shedding light on how they are transforming the financial landscape.
At Intelisync, we specialize in providing comprehensive DeFi development services tailored to meet the unique needs of our clients. From smart contract development to dApp creation and security audits, we ensure that your DeFi project is built with innovation, security, and scalability in mind. Trust Intelisync to guide you through the intricate landscape of decentralized finance and unlock the full potential of blockchain technology.
Ready to take your DeFi project to the next level? Partner with Intelisync for expert DeFi development services today!
Trusted Execution Environment for Decentralized Process MiningLucaBarbaro3
Presentation of the paper "Trusted Execution Environment for Decentralized Process Mining" given during the CAiSE 2024 Conference in Cyprus on June 7, 2024.
Best 20 SEO Techniques To Improve Website Visibility In SERPPixlogix Infotech
Boost your website's visibility with proven SEO techniques! Our latest blog dives into essential strategies to enhance your online presence, increase traffic, and rank higher on search engines. From keyword optimization to quality content creation, learn how to make your site stand out in the crowded digital landscape. Discover actionable tips and expert insights to elevate your SEO game.
TrustArc Webinar - 2024 Global Privacy SurveyTrustArc
How does your privacy program stack up against your peers? What challenges are privacy teams tackling and prioritizing in 2024?
In the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey, we asked over 1,800 global privacy professionals and business executives to share their perspectives on the current state of privacy inside and outside of their organizations. This year’s report focused on emerging areas of importance for privacy and compliance professionals, including considerations and implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, building brand trust, and different approaches for achieving higher privacy competence scores.
See how organizational priorities and strategic approaches to data security and privacy are evolving around the globe.
This webinar will review:
- The top 10 privacy insights from the fifth annual Global Privacy Benchmarks Survey
- The top challenges for privacy leaders, practitioners, and organizations in 2024
- Key themes to consider in developing and maintaining your privacy program
Have you ever been confused by the myriad of choices offered by AWS for hosting a website or an API?
Lambda, Elastic Beanstalk, Lightsail, Amplify, S3 (and more!) can each host websites + APIs. But which one should we choose?
Which one is cheapest? Which one is fastest? Which one will scale to meet our needs?
Join me in this session as we dive into each AWS hosting service to determine which one is best for your scenario and explain why!
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdfMalak Abu Hammad
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
060309 Inside Linden Lab Metanomics Transcript
1. METANOMICS: INSIDE LINDEN LAB -
AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY BY THOMAS MALABY
JUNE 3, 2009
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Hi. I’m Robert Bloomfield, professor at Cornell University’s
Johnson Graduate School of management. Each week I have the honor of hosting a
discussion with the most insightful and the most influential people who are taking Virtual
Worlds seriously. We talk with the developers who are creating these fascinating new
platforms, the executives, entrepreneurs, educators, artists, government officials who are
putting these platforms to use. We talk with the researchers who are watching the whole
process unfold. And we talk with the government officials and policymakers who are taking a
very close look on how what happens in the Virtual World can affect our Real World society.
Now naturally, we hold our discussions about Virtual Worlds in Virtual Worlds. How else
could we find a very real place where our global community can convene, collaborate and
connect with one another. So our discussion is about to start. You can join us in any of our
live Virtual World studio audiences. You can join us live on the web. Welcome, because this
is Metanomics.
ANNOUNCER: Metanomics is filmed today in front of a live audience at our studios in
Second Life.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Hello, and welcome again to Metanomics. Today we are joined
by anthropologist and author Thomas Malaby, who spent many weeks inside the offices of
2. Linden Lab, had the opportunity to examine Linden Lab’s internal communications and, best
of all for us, got permission to write a book about what he learned. It may not be too
surprising that the unusual and idiosyncratic Second Life is brought to us by an unusual and
idiosyncratic company. But the details are fascinating. Thanks to all of you who are
attending Metanomics today, including those who are viewing live on the web. Please join in
with your comments and your questions.
ANNOUNCER: We are pleased to broadcast weekly to our event partners and to welcome
discussion. We use ChatBridge technology to allow viewers to comment during the show.
Metanomics is sponsored by the Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell
University and Immersive Workspaces. Welcome. This is Metanomics.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Before we get to behind the scenes at Linden Lab, we’re going to
take a few minutes to explore some of the amazing things that are happening in the World
that is Linden Lab’s creation, Second Life. Bettina Tizzy joins us today as Metanomics
cultural correspondent and helps us put user content creation in the spotlight. Bettina,
welcome to Metanomics.
BETTINA TIZZY: Hi, Beyers. I’m glad to be here.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Bettina, you appeared on Metanomics almost a year ago. It’s
great to have you here. I guess you were here to tell us about Not Possible In Real Life,
NPIRL, a community of some of the most elite content creators in Second Life, who are
dedicated to creating and celebrating Second Life creations that are, well, not possible in
3. real life. And I guess before I ask you for an update, can you tell us a little bit about the Not
Possible In Real Life dress you’re wearing?
BETTINA TIZZY: Oh, well, thank you. This dress is by Eshi Otawara, as is the hair. And I
suppose it could be possible in real life, but it certainly is fantastical and, therefore, very
much to my liking, not to mention the fact that it is low in ARC. I think it’s at about--
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Avatar rendering costs.
BETTINA TIZZY: Right. So it’s easy for you to render and doesn’t cost a lot of lag on a
simulator.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Also, you were kind enough to put a variety of things from NPIRL
creators on our island here at Metanomics, and Treet will be showing those as we talk, but
I’d like to start by having you tell us a little bit about the chandelier that is directly over my
head.
BETTINA TIZZY: This is a favorite piece, and it’s actually a smaller version of the original
sculpture by Cliff Graves, and it reminds me a little bit of a chandelier. He calls it raindrops,
and I think it’s exquisite. It just is suspended in midair, for those who cannot see it--can
anybody not see this, will they just be hearing audio? And it has rotating textures. It’s
crystal-like and quite lovely.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Yeah, it really is. It’s something. I guess, Second Life is amazing
4. this way, that this is a creation that changes. You can zoom in. You can get different angles,
and it’s changing dynamically as well as--depending on exactly where you are.
BETTINA TIZZY: It presents the opportunity to have--a lot of kinetic sculpture, in Second
Life.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: To our viewers, I’d like to let you know that you’ll see some of
these various creations by NPIRL members throughout this short segment, and do come to
the Metanomics Sim, the Metanomics island, after the show, and you can tour the island.
We’ve got these things scattered all around. Let’s get an update. You were on for the
anniversary of NPIRL just after July Fourth last year. How has NPIRL changed?
BETTINA TIZZY: A lot has happened. I mean content creators and those who love them
have been doing a lot of growing up since we were on your show a year ago. And there’s
been some good things and some bad things. For example, as committed Virtual World
residents, we’re often living two full lives, and that’s really costly, in terms of sleep and
eating a balanced diet, generally living a healthy life. We’re also beyond the “oh, my god,
can you believe this” excitement, and now we’re tinkering under the hood. So a recent blog
post that I did, I called, “SL Is Killing Me,” spurred a lot of in-world discussions with many
exhausted content creators. So now we’re looking for ways on how to regain that balance
and our fire and our sense of wonder. And this is an ongoing challenge.
Another thing that happened is, a little over a month ago, French virtual artist
Vanfarel Kupfer died in a car accident, and, had he not given copies of his creations to his
5. in-world girlfriend, his artistic legacy would have died forever. So avatars in Second Life
devote thousands of hours to creating all this content, and all that work is lost when they die,
even if they backed it up, and even if they gave it to an alt. And even if they give their
account password to someone, when you die and, unless you’ve included your virtual
content in a real-life Will, or given copies of it to a trusted virtual friend, no one, not even
Linden Lab can legally access your work. It’s simply lost forever. And so I wanted to
generate some awareness of this and an annual reminder to residents to take appropriate
measures. So I created Will Your Workday, which, I hope, will be observed every May 18th.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: It’s actually a pretty straightforward process. You just need to
make sure that you have a Will that specifically mentions your Linden Lab account?
BETTINA TIZZY: Yes. And if you refer to the blogpost about Will Your Workday, there are a
couple of new suggestions. There’s--I forget what it’s called, something about locker. It’s a
new web service that makes your passwords available, but I think, even in that way, Linden
Lab would not look happily on your sharing your password to someone in real life without
their having received confirmation via actually a copy of your death certificate and your Will,
that clearly states you were willing your virtual content.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Well, thanks for that advice. I do hope the content creators who
are spending so much of their time in creating so much value in Second Life will follow you
up on that. I know it’s something that people don’t usually like to think about. So it’s a bit of
an “eat your vegetables” recommendation there.
6. BETTINA TIZZY: Yeah. And we are in that mode right now. We really need to eat our
vegetables, both literally and figuratively.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Let me ask about a couple other things. First you mentioned
creator fatigue, and so one question I have: Is what’s happening the issue that it’s just the
same old creators who are still around, and they’re get tired and bored, and it’s this
scrambling to find work?
BETTINA TIZZY: Boredom is not an issue.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Or is the issue that there is so much, sort of the pains of success,
that there’s just so much work to be done and so on?
BETTINA TIZZY: Well, boredom is never an issue, I don’t think. But I think it is part of living
two full lives. And, yes, the economy has hit some individuals who were making some
money in real life and some money in Second Life, and who are now devoting themselves
full time to content creation in Second Life. I mean it’s a variety of things. But the bottom line
is, is that content creators are getting tired. And, as they become more famous, more
celebrated and their content, shall we say, more widely known, they’re also more easily
available. They’re so easily available via instant message, that this represents a lot of
interruptions. If I had one wish for the user interface--well, there’s a few--but certainly one
that is very big in my book, it would be the ability to automatically turn off visibility to
everyone in Second Life while I’m onboard.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Well, that doesn’t sound like an incredibly difficult change to the
7. capabilities of Second Life. Do you know has anyone made a formal request for that?
BETTINA TIZZY: I believe there are-yeah, I think there are--I can’t point to that JIRA, but
I’m pretty sure there is one. It is something that needs to be done, I think. One other thing:
The day before yesterday, Larry Pixel--he’s Dr. Larry Johnson and the CEO of New Media
Consortium--published a guest blogpost on NPIRL, inviting the artistic community to explore
mutually beneficial ways for artists and their patrons to promote each other and then to
encourage patrons to provide land and support for large-scale installations. This is a
concern because a lot of Sims that were available to us just one year ago have vanished.
And we had a really good conversation there in the comments so, as a result of that and as
part of four hours that I’m curating and programming for Second Life’s sixth birthday, I’m
planning a panel discussion on this topic, with the director of a real-life art museum, who is
going to chair that, and who will surely give us some good insights.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: I guess when I think of patrons in the Real World, an art patron
may be providing anything from a stipend to just a place that people can use for a studio or
a gallery, do a little promotion. What would a patron be doing in Second Life?
BETTINA TIZZY: Well, for the most part, sponsors and patrons provide land. Land is
extremely desirable, and what creators want the most is a full Sim so they can terraform it
and set the ground texture at will. They could do all kinds of interesting things with the entire
look of a simulator. But the [CATS?] provide support in additional ways. That means
providing infrastructure, promotion, a number of other ways. What was in this discussion
and what Larry was blogging about was that so many content creators accept the land and
8. create great content and then don’t promote their patrons. And so we’re looking for ways to
scratch each other’s backs, and I think that is part of the growing-up process. In fact, I think
that we’re outgrowing our aversion to real life businesses in Second Life. I mean I think
there was sort of an aversion to that earlier. We want to see them flourish. And the majority
of people I have polled don’t think that this is an important part of the progress of Virtual
Worlds and opportunities for content creators.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: So thank you so much for bringing that issue up. I saw, in one of
the many comments that were on Larry Johnson’s blogpost, someone points out that
Second Life is a new phenomenon. This is John; I’m citing from John, “Second Life is a new
phenomenon and does not have an established set of patronage and sponsorship structure
that are analogous to what we see in the real life art world.” So hopefully, maybe you could
work with Larry Johnson, you and NPIRL, and sort that out a bit. So the best of luck to you
on that. And let’s see. I guess we’ve talked a lot about the content creators. We only have a
minute left, but I’d like to turn to the people who like to consume the NPIRL content. You
have another group called IMPIRL. Impossible in real life. And you have about 2,500
members in that; I think I have that right.
BETTINA TIZZY: Yes, with the web-based group and the in-world group. And it’s my goal, I
may be dreaming, but I think it should be ten times that size. We are looking at some of the
best content on the grid, and it’s a group effort. We pool all these landmarks and great tips,
and so I’d love to invite everyone to join; it’s Impossible In Real Life, and you can look for it
in search and then join.
9. ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And, in fact, we have that. Eshi Otawara made a fascinating
spinning object right here on the Metanomics studio stage, that you can come by after the
show. Click that, and that will join you in with the group. I suppose I should also mention, by
the way, that Metanomics has a group as well. It’s not quite as big as IMPIRL, but we’re well
over a thousand members, and we’d love to have you all join that as well--
BETTINA TIZZY: An invaluable group.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: --so swing by the Sim and join Metanomics. And, Bettina, thanks
so much for joining us on Metanomics.
BETTINA TIZZY: Thank you for having me.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And I’m looking forward to seeing you again soon.
BETTINA TIZZY: I look forward to hearing Thomas.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Now it’s time for our main event. Our main guest today is
Thomas Malaby. Thomas is associate professor in the department of anthropology at the
University of Wisconsin Milwaukee. He’s published a number of works--articles and
books--on Virtual Worlds, games, practice, theory and indeterminacy. He has studied quite
a bit on the relationships between institutions, technology and unpredictability, which is
going to be a topic that we will discuss today, as we talk about his most recent book Making
Virtual Worlds: Linden Lab and Second Life, which is forthcoming this month from the
10. Cornell University Press.
Thomas is also an active author at the Virtual World blog Terra Nova. Thomas, welcome to
Metanomics.
THOMAS MALABY: Oh, thank you for having me, Rob.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: I know that a lot of work goes into a book like this, even at a
slight, what is it, something under 200 pages, maybe more like 150, but still quite an
accomplishment. From a methodological perspective, I understand you’d call this
“participant observation.” What did that involve?
THOMAS MALABY: Right. Well, participant observation is the primary sort of tool in the
ethnographer’s toolkit so the research methodology was not the graphic research, and,
within that, participant observation’s kind of the centerpiece, and that is spending time with
the people you are interested in understanding. It includes not only conversations with them,
but also the being with, the observations of their practice; but also the participation, the
learning how to do, not just how they make sense of things, but how they go about their
business, go about their day, move about, live, work, all of those kinds of things. So I spent
a lot of time at Linden Lab over the course of 2005 and a little bit on either end, and
participant observation filled my days. I had a desk at one of the little clusters that they had,
and there I was in the midst of it.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And you would go to meetings?
THOMAS MALABY: Attend meetings, yeah. And their Friday lunches and grab people
11. when they were heading out for coffee and see if I could have a word with them. I did some
work, very briefly, on the grid. There was a Thomas Linden, who was me, as I did some
utterly mundane tasks helping out the community group to actually do some participating in
what being a Linden is like.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And you also had access to their electronic communications. You
were part of the various libraries and so on?
THOMAS MALABY: That was an enormous part of this research. There were just so many
kinds of digitally mediated communications that they used. Their JIRA, which is their
software management development tool, itself is full of documentation. A Wiki instant
messaging IRC. Numerous email lists. It just goes on and on and on. That took a great deal
of time.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And so did you have to sign some sort of nondisclosure or
confidentiality agreement, and what was it like then actually publishing? Did they have to
sign off on this?
THOMAS MALABY: No, they didn’t have signoff authority on publishing. The nondisclosure
agreement was really about their technology, and I wasn’t really interested. I mean I was
interested in the technology, but not so much the kind of marketable details, right. I was
interested in how they lived and worked, how they went about doing this strange task of
making and maintaining this Virtual World. The nondisclosure agreement really didn’t cover
what I was talking about.
12. ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: I think it’ll be pretty clear to everyone as we discuss the book, you
didn’t go out of your way to make them look bad or anything like that, but you’re saying, if
you had wanted to, they couldn’t have stopped you. Is that right?
THOMAS MALABY: I supposed that’s true. I kind of wanted to show them warts and all, as
human beings like all the rest of us, with all the good and all the shortcomings that maybe
we know. That’s what I was striving for, I guess.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: As you know, there’s already a book called The Making of
Second Life, by Wagner James Au. He’s a journalist, and you’re an anthropologist. How do
the books differ?
THOMAS MALABY: I think they’re different books because they come from different
traditions, but also because we’re different people and different writers. It was wonderful to
have Hamlet at Linden Lab while I was there. He was still under contract with Linden Lab at
the time, and we collaborated. One of my favorite things I did at Linden Lab was to, with
Hamlet, initiate a history Wiki for the Lindens, to prompt them to write, to contribute to this
Wiki, which was chronologically organized about the history of their company, from the
earliest, the glimmer of the idea in Philip Rosedale’s eye, from that all the way through. That
was a wonderful kind of collaboration that we did.
His book is trying to do a bit of a different thing. My book is part of an ongoing conversation,
set of conversations really, amongst them, a set of conversations about high tech
13. organizations and how they run themselves. Conversations in anthropology about games
and social practice. Conversations within the realm of Virtual World and games scholarship
certainly. So that’s kind of the discourse I was inhabiting. And Hamlet’s book is written for a
broader audience than mine. Mine, I’m sure, suffers from plenty of obscurities from time to
time.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: I enjoyed it very much. Let’s start by just jumping into chapter
one. Before getting into Linden Lab, you talk about Second Life. Chapter one is titled The
Product. Now one of the common questions that everyone talks about with Second Life and
that you address in your book is: Is Second Life a game? When we spoke last week, you
defined a game. You said it’s a legitimate arena for the unpredictable.
THOMAS MALABY: Yeah, that’s right.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: How would you use that definition to answer whether Second Life
is indeed a game?
THOMAS MALABY: Yeah, I would say that Second Life, at the end of the day, I would say
it is game-like, very importantly game-like, but not necessarily a game. Perhaps the best
way to answer the question is just to consider for a moment how game-like our lives are
generally. It’s certainly a metaphor that many people have reached for over the years,
including some of the most distinguished social theorists the 20th century saw, people like
Pierre Bourdieu and Anthony Giddens. They talked about life as game-like. What was that?
14. Well, we can start to observe that, that life is unpredictable in a bunch of different ways. We
have random events, just purely random events that impact our lives. We have the guesses
that we have to make about what people know around us and what they think, a kind of
informational game that’s part of life. We have a challenge to perform in our everyday lives,
to set about to not look stupid, to be effective, to be competent. All of those things are part
of the unpredictabilities of our experience and they’re part of what makes it possible even for
our experience to be meaningful.
Now let’s think about games for a minute. Games, even to think about offline games for a
minute, very interestingly incorporate all of these forms of unpredictability into their
structure, into their design. The pure randomness of our lives is the same kind of
unpredictability as what tumbling dice, a well-shuffled deck of cards or a spinner on a board
do for a game. That performative challenge that life confronts us with is not a different kind
of unpredictability at the end of the day, from that to performing in a sport, to make a shot in
basketball. The informational unpredictability of our lives, the guesses we have to make
about other people’s points of view is not very different from how poker controls the visibility
of resources and sets up a situation in which you have to make such guesses. So games
are not so very different from our lives, even to start with, when we look at them in a
productive way.
And then what happened when we had computers come along, and we had computer
games come to be created, which, itself, I think, was probably a very difficult thing to begin
to be able to do. It became possible to create games that have all of these kinds of
unpredictabilities and then in a far more complex array, but yet they were still games. They
15. still had established and shared game objectives. That’s an important piece of what makes
a game a game.
But then you can almost say, “Well, what is Second Life?” And you say Second Life is a
computer game, but with the shared and established objectives removed. It has all of the
other elements in it. It has the performative unpredictability, the challenge to not mistakenly
toggle off your flying while you’re moving across a Sim and exhibit that rather embarrassing
flailing animation as you tumble to the ground. It’s got the guesses that we have to make
about other people because it’s a social environment, and the software makes certain
information available to us but not others. It has the randomness as well. Certainly lag is the
prime example of that.
So it’s an environment that owes an enormous amount to game design and then computer
game design, to make a world that is much more like our everyday experience, and it was
the path of games to get there. That is something maybe we’re not used to thinking about
because we’re used to thinking of games as so very different and so very set apart from our
everyday experience, but I come from a point of view that holds that what makes games
compelling is, in fact, how they share so much with the rest of our lives, rest of our
experience.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: One of our viewers on the web, Partially on the Web is the name,
says Second Life is a game of survival. Which sounds very consistent with one of the things
you emphasize in your book, which is that the possibility of failure is really a key aspect of
the Second Life experience.
16. THOMAS MALABY: Yes, and failure is extremely important in games. It’s part of what
games legitimize to a certain extent. They legitimize it often to a greater degree than failure
is legitimized in everyday life. That often has to do not with the utter lack of stakes in games,
but with a differently arranged stakes that games have. Certainly, if you studied gambling,
as I did, for my first book, one comes away from that utterly convinced that any argument
that says games are consequence-free is not a very helpful argument.
But what we can observe about Second Life is how, as a persistent spaces and as an
open-ended or indeterminate space contrived to be such, it is possible that those things
make it possible for stakes to accumulate in Second Life, where various forms of capital to
accumulate, not only material capital in our familiar cash and commodities, but also the
social relationships themselves, the moral relationships, the relationships of obligation, the
reciprocity that’s involved in that. That social capital accumulates in Second Life.
Cultural capital as well, in the form of competencies: what we learn to do, how we learn to
be able to perform as I mentioned in relation to the game-like way in which Second Life
prompts us or challenges us to perform. And credentials, on top of that, which is very
important to see arise in Second Life, as institutions start to make headway in Second Life,
either homegrown or from the outside. All of those things raise the stakes of Second Life. I
think that may be why some people react strongly to a notion that it may be a game
because they feel that that somehow downplays all of these stakes.
I come at it from a different angle. I think only if we understand to what extent Second Life
17. owes a lot to what games are, can we even understand how it became a place where such
stakes could accumulate at all.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: One of the things you mention in your book is that Cory Ondrejka,
who used to work for the Lab and has written extensively about Second Life and Virtual
Worlds, he wrote about how Second Life overcomes the constraints of geography and how
you can replicate goods, sort of traditional notions of capital in an unconstrained way. But
you say no, it’s not the lack of constraints eliminating the stakes and the risk of failure; it’s
just changing them radically.
THOMAS MALABY: That’s right.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Your focus on that is on how social and cultural capital become
far more important.
THOMAS MALABY: Right. Right. The relative, so the configuration of those various stakes
changes radically in Second Life. That’s right.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Okay. Let’s see. I’m just looking at the time, and we have so
much to talk about. I’d like to move from Second Life to the Lab itself. You have an
extended discussion about Stuart Brand, the creator of the Whole Earth Catalogue, and the
new communalism, as it’s called in the book From Counterculture to Cyberspace. So I’m old
enough, I must admit, to remember the Whole Earth Catalogue, and it was very interesting
to me to see that you see some very close parallels between Linden Lab and Stuart Brand’s
founding of the Whole Earth Catalogue. So I guess, first, for our younger viewers out there,
18. can you summarize what the Whole Earth Catalogue was, and then just tie it to Linden Lab?
THOMAS MALABY: Sure. And much of this piece of the book owes a great deal to
Fred Turner’s excellent book From Counterculture to Cyberculture, which I highly
recommend, where he talks about Stuart Brand and many of the people around him,
Ken Kesey and the like. In relation to a kind of post World War II moment in the United
States, the United States comes out of World War II with a kind of confidence on the world
stage, with an increased emphasis on technology. But one of the interesting things, and it
even goes back to the Manhattan Project and to the radiation lab at MIT, is a new style of
work, a new set of ideas about collaboration, the ability to be creative as necessitating a
lack of hierarchy.
The Manhattan Project was military and industrial and academic people coming together to
try and innovate in a way that could not be bureaucratically kind of mandated. They had to
find new ways to do that. And what Fred Turner does a wonderful tracing is how, in the kind
of echo of that, in the aftermath of that, you had people like Norbert Wiener who talked
about complex technical systems as connected to the people who used them as
socio-technical systems. Almost really the ancestor of our current idea of a gamer is this
notion of an individual--and really underscore “individual”--interacting with technology,
seeking to master and able to accomplish tremendous things, able to express themselves.
Well, Stuart Brand and that group, in the Whole Earth Catalogue, emphasized technology to
an enormous degree. The subtitle of the Whole Earth Catalogue was Access to Tools. And
the fundamental ideals that informed this piece of the counterculture in the ’60s were a few
19. things. One was a great distrust of vertical institutions, a great distrust of the Military or
industry and all the rest. But also a great faith in technology, an enormous faith in
technology. So what you have from that is a great desire to avoid any institutional
governance, any traditional top-down governance, and also a drive to increase access to
technology.
And, when you sort of put those things together, you end up with something basically like an
ideology that has this faith in technology, that has this distrust in institutions, but what is
more, believes that, if you just make universally accessible powerful technology, then these
people who have access to it, acting again as individuals looking to express themselves
creatively, will, in aggregate, just like the invisible hand of Adam Smith’s market, generate
social goods. That’s the conviction. That’s the idea of the Whole Earth Catalogue, that we
don’t need in government--we don’t need any plan. We don’t need anyone in charge. We
don’t need any policy. We need access to tools, and everyone will create from them, and
good things will happen.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And that’s what you mean when you call Linden Lab a quote
“techno-liberal organization”?
THOMAS MALABY: Right. The kind of descendants, the homebrew computing movement
in the ’70s, just an enormous imprint on Silicon Valley that these ideas of Stuart Brand had.
It is in the woodwork. Before the show, there was some discussion about how idiosyncratic
Linden Lab is, and I replied that it’s not as idiosyncratic as it seems at first glance, and that
is because these ideals that informed the creation of Second Life and the way Linden Lab
20. sought to govern themselves and sought to prompt self-governance in Second Life are not
unique by any means to Linden Lab. They are all over high tech companies in Silicon
Valley. There’s no question about it. It’s an attitude that is still very suspicious of institutions,
still with enormous faith in technology, and still with a conviction that we don’t need to
implement any policy. We just need people to have access, and then all of the things we
want will be things that arise.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: There are a number of books that you mention in your book, that
were very influential in Linden Lab. I always love to get academics to talk about books. So
let me just run through the titles, and you can talk about how you see them as being
influential. The first is Malone’s The Future of Work.
THOMAS MALABY: Right. I always think of that in connection with James Surowiecki’s The
Wisdom of Crowds, and both of them were--
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Yeah, which is the next one on the list, but string them together.
THOMAS MALABY: Right, if I can talk about them together. Yes. They circulated around
Linden Lab--all these books that you’re raising did, recommended, say, from one person to
another that, if you’re there, you feel a certain pressure to know about them. I did as well. I
had read the Surowiecki. I hadn’t read the Malone before I was there. And these are books
that are definitely the descendants of those Stuart Brandian ideas. They are books that
pushed the idea that we don’t need, we should even give up on the project of running our
organization in some kind of intentional and top-down fashion. We should instead trust the
21. crowd, trust the collective wisdom of letting a lot of people decide, letting a lot of people
choose what they want to do what they think is important.
And one of the things that comes out of those arguments is it becomes very important when
actually the rubber meets the road and you’re trying to run a company like Linden Lab, the
devil is in the detail of what is the mechanism. All right. So now we all believe, we have a
conviction that this kind of collective wisdom is what should guide our company. It will be a
better guide to our company than any charismatic CEO, than any traditional bureaucratic
structure. That was the idea at the time. But what’s the mechanism? How can you possibly
tap into that collective wisdom in a reliable way? So those books were kind of in the
background there. And then what you saw frequently around Linden Lab, not just for
themselves, but also for Second Life, were attempts to contrive, through technology, often
game-like systems that would incent participation so that the people participating in them
would each generate certain kinds of results and outcomes, and that, in aggregate, those
results and outcomes would divine, they would reveal what the collective wisdom was.
The best example is the chess-ranking algorithm, and I use it frequently, but it’s too perfect
to avoid. They had recently moved from an older system of organizing their work called
Achievements and Objectives to putting all of the tasks that everyone in the company was
doing into JIRA, their software management development tool. And, of course, actually not
all tasks could be in JIRA, but that’s probable a conversation for another day. But the
mandate was that all would be in JIRA. So then this has thousands of tasks in JIRA. Well,
this strikes Rosedale as an opportunity to take advantage. You’ve got technology, and
everyone has access to it. This is a chance to find a mechanism through which we can
22. actually tap into the wisdom of crowds.
So they tried voting on tasks. So the idea was, all these tasks are there, why don’t people
vote on the ones they think are the most important. But it’s very revealing that a
straight-ahead vote was not acceptable around Linden Lab. It created too many social
effects. Again, think back to that notion of the individual with access to technology seeking
to master that technology. That particular notion of a gamer, really. The social lobbying, vote
lobbying and talking up your task to get votes, that struck them as really distasteful. That’s
not what they wanted. They didn’t want the social. They wanted the aggregate individual. So
they programmed a chess-ranking algorithm behind the scenes.
There’s a web page that all employees were told to go to, and it would bring up two tasks for
you, two tasks from these thousands of JIRA tasks, and you would pick which one you
thought was more important, and you were effectively picking the winner of a chess game
between these tests. So then, in aggregate, because of the way the chess-ranking algorithm
works and it’s famous for it, it would, after a bunch of people doing this ten times a day for
several days, it would generate an emergent ranking of what the most important tasks were,
the most important, the least important for the company. At least that was the theory. But it
wasn’t legitimate.
When you looked at the list, when you saw what was on the top, it didn’t ring true socially so
it was abandoned, and other attempts were made. But that’s the way they were trying to
govern themselves because all of these other more familiar forms of governance were
unavailable to them because they were subscribing to that particular set of ideas. So the
23. Surowiecki and the Malone were very much a part of the foundation of that.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Another book was Jane Jacobs The Death and Life of Great
American Cities. I understand that was actually influential not just in behind-the-scenes
work, but in how they viewed the architecture of Second Life itself.
THOMAS MALABY: Yes. And that’s an incredibly important book. It’s a famous book. I
recommend it to anyone. It’s really one of the great works about urbanism in the 20th
century. And Jane Jacobs basically, at the end of the ’50s, early ’60s, is castigating people
trying to engage in intentional urban planning, top-down urban planning, all of that which
gave us differently zoned areas and the separation of things into industrial, commercial,
residential and housing projects and all the rest. And she says the reason why New York is
such a fantastic city is because it wasn’t planned in this way. So much of it was accidental.
So much of it was “catch as catch can” contingent overlays of different kinds of initiatives at
different points in its history. And these various arrivals of these different populations, who
settle in different areas just because they happen to be available.
So what she’s arguing is that the vibrancy of an urban community of a city depends to a
great extent on its inefficiency, on the way that people forced to walk from their apartment
two blocks to a subway station are likely to pass a whole row of stores and see a new flower
shop that they didn’t know was there before. They’re likely to encounter that which they
might not otherwise set out to encounter, if they were allowed to choose to get to work as
efficiently as possible.
24. Now this informed Linden Lab in interesting ways. On the one hand, Jacobs sounds like
she’s kind of like Malone and Surowiecki because she’s saying that these kind of not
intentionally designed features are the things we like. But there’s much more of an attention
to history for Jacobs, much more of an attention to the specificities of: What were these
group? Where did they come from? What was the story here that unfolded over time? It isn’t
about trying to find a way to get a whole bunch of people to vote kind of like in the
chess-ranking thing in order to tap into the wisdom of crowds. No, it’s more about what
history can generate sometimes, maybe, if we’re lucky.
Now what Linden Lab takes from that book, interestingly, is the argument for telehubs. That,
if you force people, you let them teleport from everywhere, but you force them to arrive at
certain locations. Then, in their travel from that location, not only will that location be a place
where things build up, which is very important, in the travel from that location to where they
want to go, they will encounter the contingent, encounter the things that they would not have
otherwise set out to encounter. So that insight from Jane Jacobs informed a lot of the ways
that Linden Lab set about to try and contrive social vibrancy in Second Life. And the
telehubs were part of that effort.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Okay. Very interesting. There are a couple comments you make
later in the book that I just found to be very interesting. This is in relation to another book
The Soul of a New Machine, by Kidder. You write in your book, “Kidder claimed to have
found quote ‘disorder masquerading as order in a corporate department.’” And then you say,
and this is a direct quote, “I saw in Linden Lab order beneath a claim to disorder.” So what
do you mean?
25. THOMAS MALABY: Well, I don’t want to give the impression that everyone around Linden
Lab felt the same way; far from it. And much of my book is concerned with many of these
tensions in between employees and departments within Linden Lab. But, on the whole, it
was a company that was characterized by this deep dislike and pushing away of traditional
hierarchy, of traditional structure. They were trying to celebrate disorder. Disorder is what
would allow for all of those individuals to pursue their enlightened self-interest as they used
the technology they had access to express themselves creatively.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: But within a company that is supposedly very, I guess,
hierarchical.
THOMAS MALABY: Yeah, that’s right. In Soul of the New Machine, a Pulitzer Prize-winning
book, fabulous book, you have this very top-down driven software company in the ’70s,
early ’80s. And Kidder writes about how one of the managers, he knows that this innovation
could be done. They could do something totally different to a new product, a new way, and
he can’t get approval for it. So he’s presenting upwards that his team is doing exactly what
they’re asked, but yet he’s fostering and creating all of this open environment, these open
demands for his team members to try and innovate in this way.
Whereas, in Linden Lab, the surface claim was, “No, we don’t have departments. It’s all
disordered. You choose your own work,” as one of the statements from the mission said, the
mission of Linden Lab. But, when you actually look at how things are done, there were
departments. People reported to other people. There were numerous ways in which people
26. who were at the top had enormous amounts of influence over what people below them did.
So what you had, in fact, was a far more ordered company environment than they would
typically have been ready to acknowledge underneath this claim, this venire of just utterly
free-form disorder: Everyone choose your work. You’re your own boss. You do what you
want, and that’s it.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Toward the end of your book, you talk about that there was an
often-heard quote around Linden Lab, “Let a thousand flowers bloom.” And, in a footnote, I
don’t just point this out to demonstrate that I read the footnotes to books, but I thought this
was a really interesting footnote. You point out, first, that the real quote from Chairman Mao
is, “Let a hundred flowers bloom. Let a hundred schools of thought content.” But then you go
on to say, quote, “There are multiple ironies in Linden Lab’s invocation of the phrase, given
its original use, but I do not discuss them here.” So my question, Thomas, is: Will you
discuss them here?
THOMAS MALABY: Oh, sure, I guess. Well, on the one hand, this is a quote from Mao so
it’s coming from a particular version of communism, a particular era where there was
certainly an enormous commitment to top-down planning and control that was married to a
celebration of the common celebration of the proletariat, in that case, the peasant; in the
Chinese case, the rural. So it was a very, very different context than Linden Lab. Linden Lab
is not trying to plan and dictate an economy with the same confidence and self-
acknowledgement and awareness as a Marxist kind of effort, but, at the same time, they
were.
27. I mean the deep contradiction, the deep irony of Linden Lab is that they were constantly
talking about how they shouldn’t govern Second Life. They were constantly trying to get
their hands out of it, but yet they couldn’t deny the practical fact that they had access under
the hood that users did not. In the same way Philip Rosedale would frequently say, “In an
ideal world, I wouldn’t exist.” Right? He hoped that they could tap into the wisdom of their
own crowd, to such an efficient degree finding just the right mechanism, that he wouldn’t
have to make any decisions or, at least, so he claimed. But, of course, that couldn’t happen.
There was no question that he exerted enormous influence over what people thought was
important or what projects people pursued, just by the favor of his interest.
So for them to frequently say, “Let a thousand flowers bloom,” is ironic because, on the one
hand, yes, they are saying, “Everyone do whatever you want,” but, at the same time, they
can never get away from the fact that they have more control than they claim. And that
leads, to me, an enormously important point, which is, and a point just about Linden Lab,
but about very similar kinds of companies, Google, all these companies that are architecting
are increasingly our digital lives. And that is that we have an emerging social distinction
between the users and those who are the creators. Even users in Second Life, who are told
that they have all the agency they would ever need, that they have all the tools, access to
tools, to make whatever they want to make, they yet do not have access under the hood in
the same way that Linden Lab does. Of course, some things are changing with the attempts
to kind of open it up.
But this is a general problem, an issue with technology today. Most obviously, Linden Lab is
engaging in public policy in some of its decisions about the architecture of Second Life and
28. its policies. Google is engaging in public policy with some of the decisions it makes about its
architecture. For us not to zero in on this distinction between users who only have access to
the technology at a certain level and the creators who are under no political accountability
demands, who have all that kind of access and make those decisions, this seems to me to
be an urgent issue, and Linden Lab is just one way to demonstrate it.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: We’ve got a bunch of questions and comments from the
audience, and I guess--one I’d like to ask you is from Wyn Galbraith, “Would you want to
work at Linden Lab with all its weirdnesses?”
THOMAS MALABY: Well, I can’t speak so very well to it now. Certainly a lot has changed
as they’ve grown as a company.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Yeah. And we should point out, as some other people have
mentioned to me, that you were there in 2005. Listeners who are listening to this, keep in
mind that this is not a description of the current state of the Lab.
THOMAS MALABY: Right. When I began working with them in December 2004, I think
there were 12,000 registered users, 11,000 something like that, people who had ever
created an account in Second Life. And when I took my last trip there in January or
February of 2006, I think there were 120,000. It was a very important year, in terms of the
increase of scale of the residents in Second Life, but, yeah, it was a different time. The
company moved from being about 35 employees to being about 70 employees over that
time. And that’s a very important sort of change in scale for these kinds of challenges about
self-governance.
29. ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Actually I’d like to talk a little bit. Let’s see. We’re going to go over
just a few minutes, but that still doesn’t give us a whole lot of times. I think the question I’d
like to ask, as we just have time for a few quick answers. One is the last chapter of your
book is called Precarious Authority, and you refer to the mutiny against Captain Cook, and
this is a quote, “For techno-liberal institutions struggling to adjust to post-bureaucracy, a
similar precariousness may obtain. My sense that Second Life was always on the verge of
flying apart at the seams appears as a strong contrast only with the bureaucratic era on the
heels of which it has arrived.” And a few pages earlier, you also expressed the feeling that
Linden Lab itself was a hair’s breadth away from flying apart at the seams. So what is it that
gave you that feeling, and do you see this type of precariousness as being part and parcel
with their overall management style?
THOMAS MALABY: I do. I think it follows from the incorporation of the open-ended as a
kind of design goal, as a management goal. When you draw upon game-design techniques
to try to run your company and to try and run a product, you’re intentionally incorporating
legitimate unpredictability into how your product and your company work. Instead of doing
what used to be the case, which was to say that you weren’t allowing unpredictability at all,
and then it would kind of naturally be there just because that’s the way people are.
Peter Drucker’s ideas about management reflected that kind of claim back to the people
who thought very highly of a very rational and procedure-driven organizational management
and saying, “Look, they find the wiggle room.” They’ll always find it, no matter how much
you and try and govern the procedure. So yes, I think that institutions that are trying to
cultivate open-endedness as part of their strategy for innovating and managing their
30. products are necessarily a bit unstable in that way.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Let’s see. Another topic I’d like to touch on is the relationship
between Linden Lab and Second Life residents. One of the surprises to me, on reading your
book, was finding out that Linden Lab management was surprised that Second Life
residents developed such strong communities. What were they expecting?
THOMAS MALABY: That is such a revealing issue. I remember an interview I had with
Philip, and I had asked him whether they set about to create a digital society, and he said
the most remarkable thing, at least from the point of view of a social scientist. He said
something like--I don’t remember the exact quote--but it was something like, “I didn’t go into
it looking to create a digital society, but I knew that none of it would be interesting unless a
lot of people were involved.” Well, what does that mean exactly? It can only mean that they
were not prepared for, looking for, desirous of, the social. The tendencies of groups to form
bonds of common identity and, therefore, to exclude others. The rise of politics. Gossip. All
of these kinds of things that are such a core feature of societies everywhere were somehow
not really imagined as they set about to make this World. But that shouldn’t really be a
surprise, given what I said before.
They were operating from a set of assumptions about technology and people as individuals,
people as gamer individuals, who, given the access to the technology, would master it as
individuals. So what they imagined, I mean there would be a lot of people involved--what
they imagined is that people would be creating experiences for other people, but they’d
never stop being individuals in doing so. And there would be kind of cool effects from that.
31. But the social kind of took them by surprise.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: And clearly is--I know, for me, Second Life is all about
community. For me, of course, it’s Metanomics community. So actually following up on this
a little bit as we talk about Linden Lab and residents, you talked about the research that you
did, talking with Linden Lab employees and spending time in the offices of Linden Lab. Did
you also do research on the resident side? Did you immerse yourself in Second Life and
interview residents?
THOMAS MALABY: No. It wasn’t part of how I conceived the project. I didn’t feel that I
could do both well. I felt that Second Life and its residents were a topic worthy of more than
one ethnographic attempt. After all, Second Life is not even just one community; it is many
communities. So I knew that other people were doing that work, people who I had the
greatest opinion of, people like Tom Bukowski--Tom Boellstorff.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Yeah, Tom Boellstorff in real life.
THOMAS MALABY: Right. I knew that that work was going on. I trusted those people, and I
had the access into Linden Lab during that frame of time, and I wanted to make the very
best use of that access I could, which, for me, was a feeling that every spare moment I
would be involved with Linden Lab, whether it was remotely or onsite, to try and get a
handle on what they were all about. And I feel if I had spent moments less doing that, the
puzzle would never have fallen into place about who they were.
32. ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Great. And congratulations on getting this book published by a
fantastic institution, Cornell University’s publishing wing. So great work on that. Can you tell
us when the book is coming out?
THOMAS MALABY: The book is coming out this month. I guess I saw in chat that maybe
Amazon would have it July 1st. But, yeah, so I should be seeing a copy myself very soon,
and it should be available next time you hit the web perhaps.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Fantastic! Well, Thomas Malaby, thanks so much for taking the
time to talk with us about your book. As you do your book tours, this will be one of the few
that you can do without travel. So I hope it is successful for you, and I hope we’re reaching
an audience. I should say I enjoyed it tremendously, learned quite a bit from it, so I definitely
recommend to our viewers. We really only scratched the surface here so, if you find this
discussion interesting, please do pick up the book.
I actually have a question from my partner in Metanomics, Dusan Writer, who’s asking,
“Would you be able to answer follow-up questions on the Metanomics site?”
THOMAS MALABY: I would love to. I would love to try. I confess I’m in the middle of not
only a move, but a couple of very imminent conferences that will be pulling me out of town,
but nothing would thrill me more.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: One must be the State of Play.
33. THOMAS MALABY: That’s right. State of Play in New York and the Games Learning
Society Conference in Madison next week. But I would love to follow up.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Fantastic! Thomas Malaby, thank you for joining us and talking
about your new book.
THOMAS MALABY: Thank you.
ROBERT BLOOMFIELD: Now it’s time for our regular closing comment, Connecting The
Dots. Today I connect two dots you might find a bit surprising. Thomas Malaby’s book about
Linden Lab and the making of Second Life and the United States intelligence community’s
new research program, the Reynard Program. The line connecting these dots runs right
through Thomas’s discussion of social and cultural capital. Economists are familiar with the
traditional notion of cash or other goods serving as capital when they’re employed to
generate income. And Thomas Malaby, following the tradition of Pierre Bourdieu, argues
that the decreased importance of physical goods in Virtual Worlds raises the importance of
social and cultural capital, the ability to generate income from social relationships, from your
ability to perform acts that are valuable in the local culture, and finally from the credentials
that will lead others to rely on you, your judgment and your work.
Now mine is the language of accounting and not sociology, but the notions of social and
cultural capital are not new in my field. Few accountants would dispute their importance; we
just call them by different names, like goodwill, intellectual property, human resources,
human capital, and we debate whether they can be measured with enough reliability, that
34. they should actually be incorporated into financial statements. But thinking about social and
cultural capital in a Virtual world raises some new questions about reliability, namely how, in
a World in which residents prize their anonymity and identities can be created anew at will
and which many people actually possess multiple identities, by using multiple avatars, how
does one build a social relationship strong enough to actually generate income? How does
one establish credentials that can be trusted?
The answer, I think, is that people, who value their reputations, work hard to establish and
maintain them, whether it’s a reputation tied to their real name or not. Many Second Life
residents have maintained consistent avatars for years, have repeatedly demonstrated their
trustworthiness through hundreds, if not thousands, of interactions. And those interactions
can’t really be called anonymous, even though real-life names are often not involved
because the avatar name has effectively become the person’s brand name. You know, that
toothpaste that you use? It’s actually not a company name. It’s just a brand name. It’s made
by a company that really exists, but you’d hardly call the name of the toothpaste you use
anonymous.
Now it’s harder to build credentials than a reputation because credentials, almost by
definition, are conferred by someone else, often an organization. Linden Lab’s an
organization that could, if they wished, provide credentials to residents, and they flirted on
and off with the ideas of licensing builders and scripters and developers, and they have
some of that now. But, more often in Second Life, credentials come in the form of group
titles, being the owner or officer of a group with thousands of members can be a pretty
impressive credential. Simply being a member of the group Not Possible In Real Life is a
35. credential for a builder.
The real problem with anonymity is that not everyone who values their reputation does so in
good faith. To put it bluntly, how hard would it be for someone to establish a trustworthy
reputation in Second Life, even though in real life they’re a con artist, a stalker, a corporate
spy or a terrorist? The answer, not very. And this brings us to the Reynard Program, a call
for research proposals by IARPA: the Intelligence Advanced Research Project Activity.
Reynard, from folklore, is a trickster fox. To quote from their solicitation, “Starting from the
premise that Real World characteristics are reflected in Virtual World behavior, the IARPA
Reynard Program seeks to identify behavioral indicators in Virtual Worlds and massively
multiplayer online games that are related to the Real World characteristics of the users.”
One value of this research program, to us, will be to help us understand how sincere people
can distinguish themselves from the trickster foxes. Right now, many do this in Second Life
the way I have. I freely import my Real World information. Anyone who deals with me in
Second Life knows that, in real life, I’m Rob Bloomfield. I’m a professor of accounting at
Cornell University and so on and so forth. But the Reynard Program will let us go much
further than that. Can we look at typing patterns and make a good guess about age, gender
and nationality? I understand that no one under age 25 actually uses punctuations or spells
out the words “you” and “are,” but I’m old enough. I find it hard to break habits like that.
But how much can we learn about people from the way they dress? Is that woman avatar
really a man? Maybe we can tell. Group membership and other profile data would also
seem to provide a lot of useful information that we can use to identify who’s who. In the end,
36. the Reynard Program will help the sincere among us in two ways. By helping us uncover
tricksters and perhaps more importantly, by helping us devise new ways to establish our
reputations and our credentials more reliably within the rather unusual sphere of Virtual
Worlds, and Second Life in particular. And, by the way, don’t be surprised if later this year
you see researchers in Second Life asking you to fill out surveys that will help them
correlate your real-life characteristics with your Second Life behaviors, profile data and other
information from the World. I hope you will all cooperate with them, as this is a research
program that I think can really help all of us. But, one caution, before you provide any
personal information: double-check their credentials.
That’s all we have for this week. Join us next week when we are joined by Kevin Werbach,
who headed up President Obama’s transition team for the Federal Communications
Commission, the FCC. The FCC’s taking a very close look at internet policy, in ways that
will affect all of us who call the internet our home.
This is Robert Bloomfield signing off. Take care. And, we’ll see you next Wednesday.
Document: cor1061.doc
Transcribed by: http://www.hiredhand.com
Second Life Avatar: Transcriptionist Writer