2. 152
This paper presents a comparative study of
the stiffness properties and Permanent Deforma-
tion (PD) behavior of some OG UGMs against
well graded UGMs of similar origin (referred to
here as standard or reference material), based on
MultiStage (MS) Repeated-Load Triaxial (RLT)
tests. The aim was to implement the findings and
enhanced understanding of the material behavior
to improve or modify the existing design guidelines
in future. Furthermore, two existing simple models
were implemented to characterize the stiffness and
PD behavior of these materials and thus a set of
material parameters was generated. The objective
was to come up with a simple analytical design tool
which may be used for the layer thickness design and
performance prediction of the pavement structure.
2ā PROPERTIES OF OG UGMS
OG UMGs are UGMs where the fine portions up
to a certain size are absent from the grading. The
objective is to create voids in the aggregate assem-
bly so that water can easily penetrate and flow
through. Selection of the Particle Size Distribution
(PSD) of the materials is governed by the desired
use of the materials and infiltration capacity
requirements. FigureĀ 1 shows a typical distribution
of hydraulic conductivities for a UGM with differ-
ent PSDs as determined by the Swedish Cement
and Concrete Institute (CBI). In the figure, for
example, 2/32 refers to the minimum particle size/
maximum particle size in millimeters.
For UGMs, it is generally accepted that the PSD
with a Fuller curve having nĀ =Ā 0.45 yields the dens-
est aggregate assembly. Since for the OG UGMs the
fine portion of the particles is absent, the density
of the aggregate assembly is comparatively lower.
It is therefore likely that the mechanical resistance
of OG materials will be inferior. However, accord-
ing to the Dominant Aggregate Size range (DASR)
concept, the load bearing skeleton of a UGM
assembly is comprised of particles of a certain size
range. Particles smaller than that size simply fill the
voids with no significant contribution to the load
bearing capacity. In that regard, OG UGMs may
possess similar mechanical strength as standard
ones if fines are removed up to a certain size in
compliance with the DASR concept.
The deformation characteristics of OG UGMs
are similar to those of well graded UGMs. The
total deformation due to compressive cyclic stresses
in a UGM consists of two parts: (a) elastic or recov-
erable or Resilient Deformation (RD) and (b) irre-
versible or plastic or Permanent Deformation (PD).
For a single load pulse, this can be expressed as:
Īµ Īµ Īµtot r p= + (1)
where, Īµtot is the total axial strain, Īµr is the axial
resilient strain and Īµp is the axial permanent strain.
Usually, the resilient strain is much larger than the
permanent strain (Erlingsson and Magnusdottir
2002, El Abd et al., 2005). Both kinds of defor-
mation in UGMs are non-linear stress depend-
ent (Kolisoja 1997, Lekarp 1999, Englund 2011).
Deformations occurring in a UGM assembly have
been attributed to the elastic deformation, bend-
ing, breaking, crushing, sliding and rolling of the
individual particles (Lekarp et al., 2000).
2.1ā RD characteristics
The resistance of a UGM against the RD is
defined using the resilient modulus (or the resilient
stiffness), MR, which is an estimate of the stiffness
modulus of the specimen for rapidly applied loads,
expressed as (Huang 2004):
MR
d
r
=
Ļ
Īµ
(2)
where Ļd (or q) is the cyclic deviator stress. The
resilient strain, Īµr, is taken after several load rep-
etitions when the deformations are stabilized. The
MR is dependent on the state of stress, measured
as the sum of the principal stresses, called the bulk
stress, Īø = Ļ1 + Ļ2 + Ļ3 or the mean normal stress
or the hydrostatic stress, pĀ =Ā Īø/3. Other factors
that affect the MR are density, grading, moisture
content, stress history, aggregate type and shape
(Lekarp et al., 2000).
The variation of the MR with Īø can be expressed
with the well-known k-Īø model (Seed et al., 1962,
Hicks and Monismith 1971, Uzan 1985) in its
dimensionless form:
M k p
p
R a
a
k
=
ļ£«
ļ£ļ£¬
ļ£¶
ļ£øļ£·1
2
Īø
(3)FigureĀ 1.ā Hydraulic conductivities of UGMs with dif-
ferent PSDs.
3. 153
where k1 and k2 are material parameters and pa
is a reference pressure usually taken equal to the
atmospheric pressure as 100Ā kPa.
The MR is an important parameter for pave-
ment design. A higher MR is desirable for better
resistance against fatigue cracking of the asphalt
concrete layer. Furthermore, a higher MR provides
better downward spreading of the load and thus
reduces stresses in the lower layers.
2.2ā PD characteristics
The PD in UGMs accumulates with the number
of load applications and contributes to the rut-
ting in pavements. The PD is dependent on stress
levels, stress history, number of load cycles, degree
of compaction, particle size distribution, moisture
content (w) and aggregate type (Lekarp, 1999).
Based on the shakedown theory, Dawson and Well-
ner (1999) and Werkmeister et al., (2001) have iden-
tified that the accumulation of the PD in UGMs
falls within the three shakedown ranges, depend-
ing on stress levels (FigureĀ 2). Range A occurs for
relatively low stress levels when permanent strain
accumulates up to a finite number of load appli-
cations, after which the response becomes entirely
resilient with no further permanent strain. For
stress levels higher than this, Range B occurs where
the accumulation of permanent strain continues at
a constant rate (per cycle). When stress levels are
even higher, Range C behavior is observed where
the permanent strain accumulates at an increasing
rate that may eventually lead to failure.
Several models are available in the literature to
characterize the PD behavior of UGMs. The fol-
lowing model proposed by Rahman and Erlings-
son (2015) was used for this study:
( )Ė fbS
p fN aN SĪµ = (4)
where ( )Ėp NĪµ is the accumulated permanent strain,
Nisthetotalnumberof loadcycles,aandbareregres-
sion parameters associated with the material and the
term Sf takes into account the effect of stress state on
permanent deformation accumulation given as:
S
q
p
p
p
f
a
a
=
ļ£«
ļ£ļ£¬
ļ£¶
ļ£øļ£·
ļ£«
ļ£ļ£¬
ļ£¶
ļ£øļ£·
Ī±
(5)
where Ī± is a parameter obtained from regression
analysis. The advantages of this model are that a) it
contains only three material parameters, b) unlike
some other models, it does not require the shear
strength parameters, and c) it directly utilizes the
applied stress level as a predicting variable. These
simplify its application and it is convenient to use
for tests with a series of moisture contents. In this
study, this model was used for MS RLT tests by
applying the time hardening formulation proposed
by Erlingsson and Rahman (2013).
3ā LABORATORY TESTING
This study was based on RLT tests in the labora-
tory. The advantages of the RLT tests are that it is
a widely used and convenient approach that reveals
a great deal of information regarding the material
behavior. The RLT tests were conducted in accord-
ance with the European standard EN-13286-7
(CEN, 2004a). The MS loading approach was pre-
ferred because (a) it allows for a more comprehen-
sive study of the PD behavior for a large number
of stress conditions, (b) it includes the effect of
stress history, and (c) all of these can be attained
using a single specimen with reduced effort.
The size of the cylindrical specimens was
150Ā mm in diameter and 300Ā mm in height. The
tests were carried out applying a set of different
stress paths according to the standard referred
to as āLow Stress Levelā (LSL) as presented in
TableĀ 1. Each of the stress paths was applied for
10,000 cycles with a frequency of 10Ā Hz (Havers-
ine pulse) with no rest period. The total number of
load cycles applied during the tests were 300,000
(30 stress paths). The tests were performed under a
free drainage condition.
4ā MATERIALS TESTED
The UGMs used for this study were assorted
from three different origins. Material 1 was a
FigureĀ 2.ā Different types of PD behaviour, depending
on stress level.
4. 154
crushed rock aggregate commonly employed in
Swedish road construction. Two different PSDs
of this material were studied. The first one was a
standard PSD referred to here as āMaterial 1ā and
the second one a OG variant referred to here as
āMaterial 1 OGā where the fine particles below
2Ā mm were essentially absent from the sample. The
tests on these materials were conducted at identi-
cal moisture content regardless of their optimum
moisture contents (wopt). The second UGM was a
recycled material referred to here as āMaterial 2ā
and āMaterial 2 OGā where, for the OG variant,
fines below 1Ā mm were removed from the sample.
These materials were tested and compared at their
individual wopt. The third material, āMaterial 3ā,
was also a crushed rock aggregate used in Swedish
road construction. This was tested at two different
moisture contents identical to those of Material 1
and was included in this study to serve as a ref-
erence. The properties of these materials are pre-
sented in TableĀ 2. The PSDs are shown in FigureĀ 3.
FigureĀ 3.ā Particle size distributions.
TableĀ 2.ā Material properties.
Material wopt [%]
Specific
Gravity
Test condition
Maximum
dry density
[Mg/m3
] w [%]
Degree of
saturation [%]
Dry
density
[Mg/m3
]
Void
ratio
Material 1
(crushed rock)
ā 5.5 2.64 2.11 ā 1 ā 9.1 2.00 0.29
ā 3.5 31.9 2.00 0.29
Material 1 OG
(crushed rock)
ā 3.5 2.64 1.96 ā 1 ā 5.9 1.84 0.45
ā 3.5 21.3 1.84 0.45
Material 2
(recycled)
11.9 2.22 1.74 11.9 95.8 1.74 0.30
Material 2 OG
(recycled)
ā 4.1 2.22 1.52 ā 4.1 19.8 1.52 0.47
Material 3
(crushed rock)
ā 6.9 2.68 2.35 ā 2 26.7 1.44 0.23
ā 4 53.5 2.23 0.23
TableĀ 1.ā Stress levels used for the MS RLT tests (LSL from the European standard).
Sequence 1 Sequence 2 Sequence 3 Sequence 4 Sequence 5
Confining
stress, Ļ3
kPa
Deviator
stress, Ļd
kPa
Confining
stress, Ļ3
kPa
Deviator
stress, Ļd
kPa
Confining
stress, Ļ3
kPa
Deviator
stress, Ļd
kPa
Confining
stress, Ļ3
kPa
Deviator
stress, Ļd
kPa
Confining
stress, Ļ3
kPa
Deviator
stress, Ļd
kPa
constant min max constant min max constant min max constant min max constant min max
20 0 ā 20 45 0 ā 60 70 0 ā 80 100 0 100 150 0 100
20 0 ā 40 45 0 ā 90 70 0 120 100 0 150 150 0 200
20 0 ā 60 45 0 120 70 0 160 100 0 200 150 0 300
20 0 ā 80 45 0 150 70 0 200 100 0 250 150 0 400
20 0 100 45 0 180 70 0 240 100 0 300 150 0 500
20 0 120 45 0 210 70 0 280 100 0 350 150 0 600
5. 155
The modified Proctor method in accordance with
the European standard EN 13286-2 (CEN, 2004b)
was used to determine the maximum dry density
and wopt of the materials. The specimens were pre-
pared using a vibrocompactor. Some of these tests
were replicated to take into account any experi-
mental dispersion.
5ā RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
From the RLT tests, the MR and the accumulated
permanent strain for each specimen were calcu-
lated. FigureĀ 4(a) presents the measured MR val-
ues as a function of Īø for all the tests. FigureĀ 4(b)
shows the modelled results using the k-Īø model
calibrated from the RLT test data. From this fig-
ure, it is observed that the OG variant of Mate-
rial 1 demonstrates slightly higher stiffness values.
Furthermore, when w was increased from 1% to
3.5%, the MR values of the material with stand-
ard PSD decreased slightly, whereas the MR val-
ues of the OG variant were essentially unaffected.
For Material 2, the MR values of the two variants
were identical; however, it should be noted that the
specimen with standard PSD had a much higher
w (11.9% compared to 4.2% for the OG variant).
Although Material 3 at wĀ =Ā 1% showed the high-
est MR values, it was reduced more significantly
compared to Material 1 when w was increased to
3.5%. The probable reason was that Material 3 had
more fine fractions which contributed to the lubri-
cation effect of water, thus decreasing the MR of
the material.
The accumulated permanent strain as a function
of N is plotted in FigureĀ 5 for the individual tests.
This also includes the fitted model presented in FigureĀ 4.ā Resilient moduli: (a) measured, (b) modelled.
FigureĀ 5.ā Accumulated permanent strain.
Equation 4, calibrated using the test data. Analyses
of these plots show that at wĀ =Ā 1%, Material 1 dem-
onstrated a lower PD compared to Material 1 OG.
On the other hand, at wĀ =Ā 3.5%, Material 1 showed
an identical PD to that of Material 1 OG. In fact,
similar to the stiffness behavior, the PD perform-
ance of the OG variant was essentially unaffected
by moisture. At their individual wopt, Material 2
OG showed better resistance against PD compared
6. 156
to Material 2, while it should be noted that the wopt
of Material 2 OG was also much lower. Material
3, again in terms of PD, showed the similar high
sensitivity to moisture as in the case of MR val-
ues. It showed the highest resistance against PD at
wĀ =Ā 1% while its resistance against PD was the low-
est when w was 4%. Again, in this case the prob-
able explanation for this behavior was the relatively
higher amount of fines present in Material 3 which
enhanced the lubrication effect of moisture.
In general, it appears that the OG UGMs did
not perform any worse than the well graded mate-
rials. It also seems that the OG materials were
less sensitive to moisture and as a result they per-
formed relatively better than the reference materi-
als at higher moisture content. For the well graded
materials, the fines might have contributed to the
lubrication effect of water which increased the PD.
The k-Īø model and the PD model used in this
study worked quite well for both kinds of mate-
rials, as can be realized from FiguresĀ 4 and 5.
The calibrated parameters of these models for
the materials used in this study are presented in
TableĀ 3. The material parameter data obtained
here may be used as a guideline for future studies.
Furthermore, by establishing the relation of these
parameters to moisture, it can be used for predict-
ing the stiffness and PD behavior of the materials
with the seasonal variation of moisture.
6ā CONCLUSIONS
The stiffness and PD characteristics of some OG
UGMs were studied by means of MS RLT tests in
the laboratory. This study was limited to 2/32Ā mm
(minimum/maximum particle size) UGMs where
the fine fraction up to 2Ā mm was removed from the
samples (FigureĀ 3). Results showed that the stiff-
ness and PD characteristics of these materials were
still comparable to the well graded reference materi-
als. Because of the lack of fines, the OG materials
appeared to be less sensitive to moisture variation
for which they may exhibit more stable behavior
with seasonal variation of moisture and better pro-
tection against frost heaving. This result suggests
the suitability of the 2/32Ā mm UGMs for use in
drainage layers and in permeable pavements. The
models used for this study were quite well suited to
describe the MR and PD behavior of these materi-
als. Thus the model parameters obtained here may
be used for prediction of rutting, estimating bear-
ing capacity and for layer thickness design using
any suitable pavement design software. Since the
study was limited to RLT tests in the laboratory,
the results obtained here should be further vali-
dated with field studies and large scale tests such
as using a Heavy Vehicle Simulator (HVS). The
RLT test database should be further extended with
tests on more materials and replicate testing. The
study should also be extended to other OG UGMs
with different PSDs, for instance, using 4/32Ā mm
materials.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was sponsored by the Swedish Trans-
port Administration (Trafikverket). Part of the
tested materials was supplied by NCC (Sweden).
REFERENCES
Ahmed, A., Hellman, F., and Erlingsson, S., 2016. Full
Scale Accelerated Pavement Tests to Evaluate the
Performance of Permeable and Skeletal Soil Block
Pavement Systems, The Roles of Accelerated Pave-
ment Testing in Pavement Sustainability, Springer,
pp. 131ā144, ISBN: 978-3-319-42796-6 (Print) 978-3-
319-42797-3 (Online).
CEN-European Committee for Standardization, 2004a.
Cyclic Load Triaxial Test for Unbound Mixtures.
Brussels: European Standard. EN 13286-7.
CEN-European Committee for Standardization, 2004b.
Test Methods for the Determination of the Labora-
tory Reference Density and Water Content: Proc-
tor Compaction. Brussels: European Standard. EN
13286-2.
Dawson, A.R. and Wellner, F., 1999. Plastic Behaviour of
Granular Materials. Nottingham: The University of
Nottingham. Reference PRG99014, April, 1999, Final
Report ARC Project 933.
El Abd A., Hornych P., Breysse D., and Denis D., 2005.
Prediction of permanent deformations of unbound
pavement layers. In: Proceedings from the 7th Inter-
TableĀ 3.ā Model parameters.
Material
w
[%]
Dry
density
[Mg/m3
]
k-Īø model
PD model
(Ī±Ā =Ā 0.75)
k1 k2 a b
Material 1
(crushed
rock)
1 2.00 1520 0.62 0.00027 0.15
3.5 2.00 897 0.87 0.00108 0.11
Material
1 OG
(crushed
rock)
1 1.84 1529 0.67 0.00076 0.12
3.5 1.84 1777 0.57 0.00226 0.08
Material 2
(recycled)
12 1.74 1107 0.69 0.00123 0.13
Material 2
OG
(recycled)
4.1 1.52 870 0.82 0.00088 0.13
Material 3
(crushed
rock)
2 1.44 1947 0.57 0.00001 0.24
4 2.23 1100 0.75 0.00178 0.12
7. 157
national Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads
and Airfields (BCRA), June, Trondheim, Norway.
Englund, J., 2011. Analyses of Resilient Behavior of
Unbound Materials for the Purpose of Predicting
Permanent Deformation Behavior. Doctoral thesis.
Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg,
Sweden.
Erlingsson, S. and Magnusdottir, B., 2002. Dynamic
triaxial testing of unbound granular base course
materials. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Con-
ference on Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields,
BCRA ā02, Lisbon, Portugal. Lisse, Netherlands:
Balkema, 989ā1000.
Erlingsson, S. and Rahman, M.S., 2013. Evaluation of
permanent deformation characteristics of unbound
granular materials by means of multistage repeated-
load triaxial tests. Transportation Research Record:
Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Trans-
portation Research Board of the National Acad-
emies, Washington, D.C., No. 2369, 11ā19. DOI:
10.3141/2369-02.
Hajek, J.J., Kazmierowski, T.J., Sturm, H., Bathurst, R.J.,
and Raymond G.P., 1992. Field Performance of Open-
Graded Drainage Layers. Transport Research Record
1354, Transportation Research Board, Washington
DC, USA, Accession Number: 00625419, pp. 55ā64.
Hicks, R.G. and Monismith, C.L., 1971. Factors influ-
encing the resilient response of granular materials.
Highway Research Record, 345, pp. 15ā31.
Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement Analysis and Design. 2nd
ed. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Kolisoja, P., 1997. Resilient Deformation Characteristics
of Granular Materials. Doctoral thesis. Tampere Uni-
versity of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Larson, R., 1990. Swedish experience with design and
construction of pervious asphalt constructions. In:
Proceedings of the Standing Conference on Stormwater
Source Control, edited by: Pratt, C.J. Coventry, UK:
Coventry University. Vol I.
Lekarp, F., 1999. Resilient and Permanent Deformation
Behavior of Unbound Aggregates under Repeated
Loading, Doctoral thesis, TRITA-IP FR 99ā57,
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
Sweden.
Lekarp, F., Isacsson, U., and Dawson, A., 2000. State of
the art. i: Resilient response of unbound aggregates.
Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (1), 66ā75.
DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947(2000)126:1(66).
Pratt, C.J., 1990. Permeable pavements for stormwa-
ter quality enhancement. In: Proceedings of Urban
Stormwater Quality EnhancementāSource Control,
Retrofitting and Combined Sewer Technology, edited
by: Torno, H.C. pp. 131ā155. ASCE, New York.
Rahman, M.S. and Erlingsson, S., 2015. A model for pre-
dicting permanent deformation of unbound granular
materials. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16:3,
653ā673, DOI: 10.1080/14680629.2015.1026382.
Rahman, M.S., 2015. Characterising the Deformation
Behaviour of Unbound Granular Materials in Pave-
ment Structures. Doctoral thesis, TRITA-TSC-PHD
15-004, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stock-
holm, Sweden.
Seed, H.B., Chan, C.K., and Lee, C.E., 1962. Resilient
characteristics of subgrade soils and their relations
to fatigue in asphalt pavements. In: Proceedings of
the International Conference on Structural Design
of Asphalt Pavements, Ann Arbor, USA, Vol. 1,
611ā636.
Uzan, J., 1985. Characterisation of Granular Mate-
rial. Transportation Research Record. Journal of the
Transportation Research Board, 1022, 52ā59.
Werkmeister, S., 2003. Permanent Deformation Behav-
ior of Unbound Granular Materials. Doctoral thesis,
University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
Werkmeister, S., Dawson, A.R., and Wellner, F., 2001.
Permanent Deformation Behavior of Granular Mate-
rials and the Shakedown Concept. Transport Research
Record 1757, Transportation Research Board, Wash-
ington DC, USA, Paper No. 01-0152, pp. 75ā81.